Account clearing problem in Return to vendor scenario

We created purchase order , GR and MIRO has also been done.
Now we need to return the material to vendor due to some reason , in return vendor will pay back the money.
My scenario is we purchased the item from vendor at Rs.500.At the time of return vendor says he will not pay the full amount.
If vendor pay Rs 300 instead of Rs.500.Then there is some amount left in GR/IR clearing account and
that is not right.How to clear GR/IR account automatically and what is the right procedure.
Accounting Entries :
At the time of return to vendor
Inventory acc - credit by 500
GR/IR Acc     - debit by 500
At the time of subsequent credit
GR/IR acc      - credit by 300
Vendor acc  - debit by 300
how to clear GR/Ir account automatically in return to vendor scenario???
Please help.
Regards
Kavita

Hi,
Since you have done MIRO, now you will need to perform Credit MEMO. This is also done in MIRO.
However here, you would state the quantity to be returned to vendor and the "reduced" price.
After performing the above, perform return delivery and the accounting entries would be ok.

Similar Messages

  • Open item manage accounts clearing problem

    Dear experts,
    We have created some of the liability gl accounts master without open item management.  After a period of time we have converted the gl accounts into open item management by executing the programme RFSEPA02.  Now we are going to clear the old documents, which are posted before open item management conversion.
    Now the problem we are facing is  - document splitting for the old document.
    Kindly send your openions to clear the old documents or again we are ready to convert the open item management to non-open item management for the GL accounts.  How to do it.
    BSR

    butter to search for OSS note or write service market place

  • On Account Clearing Vendor/Customer

    Dear fellows
    We are to be implementing SAP ERP ECC 6 by u201CABACUS Consulting (Implementer)u201D here we enable the new GL functionality for segment reporting.  We have a hot issue with on account clearing in both customer and vendor.
    The scenario is that
    When we clear on account customer through f-32 and vendor through f-44 the system generates extra line items those increase the debit and credit amount with their respective ledgers.
    *Example*
    Create customer invoice e.g 50,000 Rs. with profit center 10, segment 1000
    Receipt on account payment from customer 50,000 Rs. with profit center 10, segment 1000
    Clear the account with f.32 at that time clearing line items are generating.
    Note:
    According to our implementers u201CAbacusu201D this is the standard functionality of SAP and referred the SAP standard Note 69767 to prove their justifications.
    The transaction is not relevant with given below difference clearing:
    1.     Account Type
    2.     open Item Account Number
    3.     General Ledger Account
    4.     GL Account Number
    5.     Main Asset Number
    6.     Company Code
    7.     business Area
    8.     business place
    9.     Profit Center
    10.     Partner Profit Center
    11.     Credit Control Area
    12.     Company ID
    13.     Update Currency for General Ledger Transaction Figure
    14.     Withholding Tax Code
    15.     Certificate Number of the Withholding Tax Exemption
    16.     Payee code
    17.     Document Number for Earmarked Fund
    18.     Earmarked Funds: Document Item
    Regards,
    Farhan FICO

    hello srikanth
    thanks for showing ur intrepid.
    invoice entries (fb60)
    Vendor(10013)               10,000
    Exp(41709006)          10,000
    payment entries (fbcj)
    vendor(10013)          10,000
    Cash (16620006)               10,000
    clearing entries
    Vendor(10013)          10,000
    vendor(10013)               10,000
    the clearing document increase the DR and Cr amounts.
    here, i want to clear one thing, this is not the SAP standard functionality because i have test this scenario on my IDES system and it is not generating any extra line items.
    SAP released the notes 69767 to justify the clearing line items and the system exactly work according to the notes, but in our case any of the given options (mentioned in Notes and my above post) be not matched causes to generate any extra line items.
    Regards,
    Farhan

  • Return to vendor SAP Configuration

    Hi,
    I am getting an error PURCHASE ORDER XXXXXXXXX DOES NOT CONTAIN ITEMS FOR STOCK TRANSFER , when i am doing RETURNS TO VENDOR scenario. The following Configuration i have done
    1. SPRO-> IMG-> MM-> Purchasing-> Purchase Order-> Returns Order-> Returns to Vendor as F-NB-Plant-RL
    2. Assigned Customer in Vendors Control data and Assigned vendor in customers control data.
    3. Shipping Point Determination also done
    I am able to create Return Purchase Order by checking the check box Returns.
    Delivery got created in VL10B Tranction, when i am trying to do the PGI in VL02N I am getting the above error. Purchase order history in PO got up dated with delivery document
    Please Suggest me any configuration required, possible solution for the same.
    This is a burning issue for us currently and any help provided will be great.
    Thanks & Regards
    BK

    Thanks Charlie. But I don't have UB in my document type list. Plus, I am not trying to do a Inter-Plant STO PO on the Returns. So I would want to transact it with Standard PO type, if possible.
    I saw in some other threads, that it was an issue with item category determination, but I haven't found the exact solution. Is there some other configuration I am missing?

  • Clearing problem for vendor open item

    while clearing open item of vendor through T-code F-44 i am facing the problem following problem
    Document splitting :-Item for clearing 1000/100020603/2006/005 not found,
    Daignosis as given in error:-document splittting cannot be performed clearing because it was not possible to find complete splitting information items to be cleared(company code 1000, doc. no.100020603, item 005). procedure as provided by the error massage is that the item  was not posted  with active document splitting. In this case this item or document would have to be migrated

    Dear Sweta,
    I think there is no such a table, as you expect, existing in SAP. As I know here are the
    most popular table about Accounting documents.
        Accounting documents
        BKPF                Accounting documents
        BSEG               item level
        BSID                 Accounting: Secondary index for customers         
        BSIK                 Accounting: Secondary index for vendors           
        BSIM                 Secondary Index, Documents for Material           
        BSIP                 Index for vendor validation of double documents   
        BSIS                 Accounting: Secondary index for G/L accounts
        BSAD               Accounting: Index for customers (cleared items) 
        BSAK                Accounting: Index for vendors (cleared items)   
        BSAS                Accounting: Index for G/L accounts (cleared items)
    If you need information about open line items of a certain day, you have to use ABAP.
    Regards.
    Maxielight.

  • Vendor document clearing problem in F-44

    Hi  SAP Guru's
    I  am facing one  unique issue with my client.  When I simulate and clear the vendor documents  the below error is coming.
    And checked the documents in FBL1N Document type - WE is coming i.e GRN document .
    It is a service PO and the entry is below.
    Pkey          Spe.GL             Account                Desc
    81          45000005     REP & MAIN- P & M
    96          16011099     SR/IR CLG-EXP&SERV
    39     F     119445     Vendor
    27          119445     Vendor
    Tax code ** in procedure TAXINN is invalid
        Message no. FICORE704
    Diagnosis
        The tax code entered is not defined in the country for this company
        code.
    System Response
    Procedure
        Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
    Procedure for System Administration
        If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system
    Thanks
    Ranganadh

    Dear All,
    Thank you for your  reply.
    Tax code for non taxble items  are already created and assigned to co.code. The error is showing tax code but  as per my analysis  it is not related to tax code. It is some how posting problem except this vendor rest of all vendors there is no  clearing problem.
    My concern is why the document tupe "WE"  i.e MIGO document is coming vendor line items.
    Regards
    Ranganadh

  • Return to vendors- robust process considering all scenarios

    Gurus,
    i am redesigning return to vendor process. Our FI team is facing problems in creation of credit memos. they have not done so far and hence there is lot of amount pending from vendors to us. now, they want to be involved in this process a lot.
    its workign good for logistics and MM guys.
    howver i want to design a process which is best for that perticualr scenarios.
    rt now we create return PO whenver we return to vendors.
    i got to know FI team can review from Me2l tcode and decide to raise or not.
    here are my questions after some R& D of mine reg this.
    1a) how can FI team know they have returns. they keep monitoring tcodes?
    1) what is teh best return to vendor process when invoice has been done for initial PO.
    just reverse MIGO and MIRO?
    2) what is the best practise when there is no invoice yet.
    3) how to read ME2L and decide whether we need to create crediot memo?
          are all quantities less than zero are returns?
    4) FI team wants to add additional costs like, frieght, storage, hence they r creating ret PO. can thsi be done even by just doign MIGO or some other conditions setting.
    5 ) do we always get to know what original PO is ? based on batch?
    6) once a ret PO is created can it be changed for extra costs from FI after its been picked and shipped? ( during Me2L step)
    i have no proobs in creatign ret PO as process is workign for other teams and moreover no need to attach PO, however need to know what approach to take when. especially invoiced/ not invoiced... extraa costs/ no extra costs and original PO known/ not known, so that best process can be in place.
    regards
    Kavana

    we worked out a process.. thanks

  • G/L Account Blocked and Return to vendor should be done

    hi all
    i have a scenario where i need some solution.
    two years before user created a PO with some G/L account and one year before that GL account is blocked for posting and now the user wants to do 122 movement type returns to vendor..
    is there any option where we can change the g/l account while doing or any other options?
    regards
    Ganeshkumar

    Hi,
    I think you can unlock the GL A/C..and post the movement and lock it again.
    but you need proper approval for that.
    Kuber

  • Vendor account clearing - Error message F5354

    Hi All,
    I am trying to do Vendor account clearing through transaction code F-44, when I am getting the error message Message no. F5354
    "Account "1000001" in company code "1000" is marked as a reconciliation account for account type "K" and cannot therefore be directly posted to".
    Account 1000001 is a reconciliation account defined in the vendor. The documents which I am trying to clear do not have any special GL indicators.
    Please can anyone tell me why I am getting this message
    Thanks in advance.
    Edited by: mgokhale on Aug 17, 2010 8:20 AM

    Hi,
    Usually you have to give Adj. GL for automatic exchange rate clearing differences.
    Please change the account in OBA1 transaction under account key KDF.
    Here you have given reconciliation account for B/s account which can't possible for direct postings.
    Please select recon account and double click, there you will find the account determination GL accounts.
    Rgds
    Murali. N

  • Exchange rate in header of acc.doc after posting return to vendor

    Hi Gurus,
    in accounting document, when i recalculated amount in doc.currency & amount in local currency in item line was not same with exchange rate in header section...Anyone can explain to me why this miscalculation can happen ?
    Thanks

    Hi Zafar,
    exchange rate in header of this acc.doc was take automatically from table OB08 & the problem is in item line this acc.doc which is generated automatically after posting return to vendor the calculation amount in local currency was not take the exchange rate from header but from exchange rate when GR ( FLow : mvt 101--> mvt 122 ). so this is normal behaviour or there are bug ?
    thanks in advance

  • Problem with amount of vendor invoice than amount in the order

    Hi,
    My problem is that a vendor can send an invoice with an amount superior than the order's amount and then send a refund with the différence to regularize.
    Actualy, it's impossible to make an invoice with superior amount of the order's amount in MIRO transaction because an IMG point (SPRO) is missing to pass the difference between order and invoice
    I'm new in FI and i don't know exactly what to do.
    Can you give me the different IMG point to make it possible? Do i have to create a special account ?
    Thanks in advance.
    PS : if my problem is not clear (bad english) don't hesitate to ask me some details.

    My question is maybe stupid but if i adjust the tolerance, my invoice can be saved in MIRO, but is this enought ? do i have something else to do ?
    For example i have an order with an amount of 2000$ and the vendor send me an invoice with an amount of 2200$. If i adjust the tolerance at 200$, the invoice can be saved. but the vendor send also a 200$ refund.
    Actually, the users have to create an order with a 2200$ amount and record the memo credit of 200$ in FB65 to regularize.
    So if i adjust the tolerance, can i save my invoice in MIRO with an amount of 2200$ ? Do i have to record a line in the "G/L account" tabstrip with the 200$ ?? if yes, what account type ?
    Sorry if my questions are stupid, i'm a beginner in FI.
    Thanks a lot in advance.
    Message was edited by:
            Olivier Abbeloos

  • Return to vendor (Excise material)..?

    HI all
    Can anybody explain me about return delivery to vendor after invoice verification process..
    I have created return PO, againsgt that PO I done MIGO but while doing goods receipt for return PO (the material which I m goint return is excisable).
    For this how can do excise return to vendor, while doing MIGO in excise tab what i should select which excise number i should giv.
    Thanls
    sap-mm

    hi,
    1. ME21N - Create a Returns PO (Activate "Returns" indicator for PO line item)
    2. MIGO - Goods Receipt > Purchase Order (Returns PO) (Here system will hit Mvmt type "XXX" and you can also select Un-restricted/blocked stock from where you want to return the stock)
    3. J1IS u2013 Excise Invoice Other Movements
    Here click on u201Ccreateu201D button to create an outgoing excise invoice and reverse the CENVAT Amount.
    Here put all details as below and Press u201CEnteru201D.
    Ref.doc.type - eg :MATD
    Doc Number - Material document No of 161 mvmt
    Doc Year
    Series Group
    Excise Group
    Vendor
    Here check BED, ECS and SECess values to be reversed and click on u201CSaveu201D button to post the excise invoice.
    4. J1IV - Post and Print Outgoing Excise Invoice.
    5. MIRO - Credit memo w.r.t. Returns PO.
    Note: - Excsie Transactions to be followed if CIN functionality is in use.
    At the time of Return Delivery (MIGO);
    Stock Account - Cr
    GR/IR Clearing A/c - Dr
    It should be as following during J1IS and J1IV; (ETT - OTHR)
    CENVAT Input BED - Cr
    CENVAT Input ECS - Cr
    CENVAT Input SECess - Cr
    CENVAT Clearing - Dr
    So that at the time of MIRO (Credit Memo to Vendor)
    Vendor Account - Dr
    GR/IR Clearing A/c - Cr
    CENVAT Clearing - Cr

  • Return to vendor from Depot

    Hello
    We purchased material in Depot with RG23D updated.
    Now we want to send the material back to Vendor.
    What is the process to be used in Depot?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    You can send the material with PO & Without PO
    1) PO create & flagged return to vendor in item over view
    2) MIGO system automatically pick movement type 161 stock reduces from stock & GR/IR Clearing account dbt,
    3) j1is capture excise duties
    4) Print the excise invoice
    without PO
    MIGO
    select return delivery
    JI1S against material document no
    Print outgoing excise invoice.
    But before that in customization setting you have remove register updation for the movement type 161.
    Regards
    Sudhir

  • Unusual GL clearing problem

    Hi all. We are using SAP ECC6 Fi Co Sd MM We use a single company code.
    While trying to clear the GL outgoing Euro bank account using Tx F-03 our accountant is encountering a problem with 1 pair of documents. Both these documents were posted within a few days of one another, in the same period and at the same exchange rate. The Euro and GBP amounts on both are identical. He is entering the correct dates, currency and CoCode for that account. One document is a GL document (debit) the other a payment through F110 (credit). All other items in the account cleared without difficulty. Yet, for this pair of documents he is getting the following error: Consolidated companies WEL (our company code) and '' are different.
    I have investigated the 2 documents thoroughly. Both posted correctly when entered and all company code references are correct. I have tried to enter the debit and credit lines manually, entering the correct company code in each case but the error message remains the same.
    Does anyone know what might cause this error and if so how to fix it?
    Thanks in advance
    David

    Thank you for your replies.
    Prasanna - Unfortuantely I have tried a variety of selections e.g. document, date, amount, etc but the result is the same. Neither of the documents is cleared in part or whole. Currency exchange is fine with both postings being in the same period at the same exchange rate.  But thank you.
    Shivram - Neither of the document types has intercompany postings selected in the configuration. As we only have the 1 company code no postings are set as inter-company in SAP. On the GL document the correct postings have taken place between Euro outgoing payments account and Euro bank account. In the Payment document the postings are correctly between Euro outgoing Payments and the Vendor account in Entry view and between Euro OP and Trade accounts payable in GL view. All postings have worked correctly, it is only at the clearing stage that this problem arises.  But thank you for the suggestions.
    Edited by: David Crossley on Aug 5, 2009 3:40 PM

  • FI Integration with movement type 122 - Return to vendor

    Hello,
    I have a problem with transactions MBRL, because movement type 122 (return to vendor) impact the 408xxx and not account 409xxx.
    I checked the link between material group and valuation class (OLME), but in OBYC i don't know which transaction select ?
    And, the valuation classe linked to that material group does not exist in any line in OBYC
    Thanks

    For 122 , GI happensds accounting entry is
    Stocl  Cr
    Gr/IR Dr
    It is opposite of Goods recipt . Please maintain BSX for stock with val class and  WRX for Gr/Ir with val class.
    IF freight also there check FR1 for the same . NO GBB off sett required .T code OByc
    rewdzz

Maybe you are looking for

  • Time Capsule file transfer - why so slow?

    I've got a simultaneous dual-band Time Capsule serving as a router for my network, which includes a newer Macbook Pro and an older PowerPC G5. When I transfer a 2GB file directly from the G5 to the MBP (this is of course going through the TC as the r

  • New favicon will not display in Firefox, but does display in Safari

    I am working on a new website and uploaded the favicon.ico into the root folder (Go Daddy). The favicon appears when I use Safari, not does not appear in Firefox... I have a mac OSX version 10.5 I have cleared the history and cache too. Any thoughts?

  • Got the 6870 twin Frozr do I need a bios update?

    I returned my Gtx 560 and got the 6870 twin frozr oc. I like it much better. Do I need a bios update for this card? I'm assuming I have the stock version... Thanks

  • Horizontal submenu bar?

    hi .. i'm pretty new to spry and was wondering if there's a way in order to create a horizontal with a submenu that's displayed horizontal too? in dreamweaver i see only the possibility to change the style of the main menu bar but not the submenu.

  • Frequent Database Access through  Java Mapping ?

    I have to implement a Java Mapping Program which will require frequent database Access to compare and read table data from some other  data base . What is the most optimum procedure to  implement it ? Should i make a jdbc  call every time from the co