Acctt Asgmnt Cat ' Ind. Cust. w/o KD-CO

Dear Friends,
We have a very peculiar case. The users have created the PO with Acctt Assmnt Cat as "Ind. Cust. w/o KD-CO" with Sales Order reference and GL. However, the GL used is that of Inventory Account (B/sheet) rather than COGS Account (P/L). The issue is that while doing the Invoice Verification, the amount of invoice was more than the PO and the difference got debited to the COGS A/c but has not flown into COPA even though the SO reference was there.
Could any one help in this regard - is it correct to mention the Inventory A/c instead of P/L A/c and why is the difference value not flowing to COPA and there is no Profitability segment maintained.
Regards,

Hi Hari,
Thanks for the response.
There is a material in the PO and also there is a GR document before the Invoice. How does that help?
Regards

Similar Messages

  • Values not flowing to COPA - PO with Acctt Asgnmt Cat-Ind. Cust. w/o KD-CO

    Dear Friends,
    The users have created a PO with Acctt Asgnmt Cat as "Ind. Cust. w/o KD-CO" while mentioning the Sales Order and GL Account No. in the PO. The GL Account No. defined is that of Inventory Account (Balance Sheet). The issue is that at the time of Invoice Verification, the price was different from the PO value and the difference in the price got debited to the COGS Account, However, even though there was a reference to the PO, while posting the difference to COGS, the system did not create the Profitability Segment and thus the value did not flow to the COPA. But the basic costs debited to COGS at the time of GR has flown to COPA.
    Could any one help in understanding this, is this the normal behavior, and was it correct to mention the Inventory GL in PO instead of COGS A/c.
    Regards

    Hi
    1. I asked you which CO object it is posting to upon PRD... Profit center is not a CO object if the cost element category is 1....
    Your COGS should be ideally Cost Ele Catg 1, which means without a Cost Center, IO or WBS you can not post..
    2. As you say, COGS is flowing to COPA upon PGI, which means Prf Segment is the Cost Object for COGS account
    Similarly, what is the CO object upon PRD and what is your cost ele category?
    3. If it is 12 instead of 1, may be you can post to Profit Center also.. But system gives a warning message KI 166 Enter a true account assignment object with revenues.. You should convert it into Error in OBA5 so that you wont be able to post without a True CO Object
    *4. The notes which I mentioned are both for flowing COGS as well as PRD into Costing based COPA*
    Regards
    Ajay M
    Edited by: Ajay Maheshwari on Oct 14, 2010 10:35 AM
    Edited by: Ajay Maheshwari on Oct 14, 2010 10:36 AM

  • VPRS updated incorrectly for SO with item cat Ind PO

    Hi SAP Gurus
    We created a SO with item cat (Individual Purchase Order - Account
    Assignment M in PO).In PO we have checkd the item as free goods.
    However during billing the VPRS was not captured from PO price (which
    is 0.00) but it was updated from material master. As for normal items,
    VPRS was updated correctly from PO.
    Pls advise for free goods how can we have the VPRS updated correctly from PO instead of material master.
    Sanjay

    Hi,
    Goto VOV7, select item category-In business data tab - tick determine cost.
    check in MR21 for material price.
    Thanks,
    Mohanprabu C.
    Edited by: mohan prabu on Jul 7, 2009 9:12 AM
    Edited by: mohan prabu on Jul 7, 2009 9:12 AM

  • Acct assignment cat

    Dear All,
    In OVZG, account assignment cat is E.
    1) may i know what is KD-CO and Ind cust?
    2) where I can see the mapping of the code below with GL?
    B   Make to stock KD-CO
    C   Sales order
    E   Ind. cust. w. KD-CO
    M   Ind.cust.without KD
    Q   Proj. make-to-order
    V   Ind. cust. w. KD-CO
    Thank you

    Hi,
    IPC has to be configured.
    Please check the following threads :
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=211089&messageID=2714527
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=211089&messageID=2715019
    Kind regards,
    Yann

  • Prd Order Settlement Issue

    Hi all,
    While carrying out production order settlement for a production order, the system is determining the wrong GL A/C. Well it's deriving the GL A/C which does not exist. I need to change this assignment to a valid GL A/C. How am I suppose to fix this?
    It's an MTO order, settlement cat. SDI. I'm not sure why the settlement rule is SDI for this specific order too, normally it should be MAT.
    Regards,
    G. Coelho

    The valuation now is for sales order is incorrect.   SDI means that the sales order stock is non-valuated and sales order is used to capture the costs.  This is because the requirement class of the sales order is incorrect.
    First check the requirement type in sales order (VA03).  In procurement tab of the first main screen, it will show the requirement type for your sales order item.
    Then check t-code OVZH, there will be a link between requirement type and requirement class.
    Then check OVZG to check the requirement class.
    (If you want to change, use the config.path Controlling -> Product Cost Controlling -> Cost Object Controlling -> Product Cost by Sales order -> Control for Sales-order-related Production... -> Check requirement class.  Howeiver, this should be done after you consult with SD and CO consultant)
    You will see the your requirement class.  Check whether account assignment cat., and valuatio are both set to M (ind.cust.order w/o CO, and valuated sales order stock).  I suspected that a sales order per your issue is set to non-valuated stock (Account Assignment E, valuation blank).
    Hope it helps.
    Edited by: ayethebing on Jul 16, 2010 1:34 PM

  • Multiple account assignment of p.r while acct. assignment is P & itemcat-D

    I AM FACING A PROBLEM IN CREATION OF P.R HAVING MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT . I AM TAKING ACCT. ASSIGN MENT CAT- P i am distubting in different WBS ELEMENT. BUT SYSTEM GIVES AN ERROR MESSAGE
    Multi acct. assgt. not allowed for ind. cust. req. or engineer-to-order
    Message no. 06268
    Diagnosis
    Multiple account assignment is not defined for items with account assignment to "individual customer requirement" or "manufacture for individual project" (engineer-to-order).
    This means that you can only enter one account assignment item in the case of individual customer requirement or engineer-to-order.

    pls go to spro-mm-purchasing- account assignment-maintain account assignment-select the account assignment u r using-check ID: AcctAssgt Scrn.
    regards,
    indranil

  • Make to Order - Goods Receipt to Sales Contract

    Dear SD Gurus,
    In our scenario, sales order is created with reference to sales contract.
    In the requirement class 040, Account Assignment Cat is "E Ind. cust. w. KD-CO".
    So, when production order is complete, the stock is GR-ed into the sales CONTRACT number rather than the Sales Order number thus making it impossible to perform delivery.
    We need this to be GR-ed to sales order.
    Any advice is appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Soo

    Problem solved.
    Needed to change the requirement class in order to avoid PP parking the stock to the Sales Contract.

  • Item Category TAB is not looking for Special Stock.

    Hello,
    We have an issue while using item category TAB. For sales orders having item category TAB is allowing to create the Delivery note even though there is no stock received (GOODS RECEIPT) and assigned against this sales order stock.
    Ideally the system should not allow to create the Delivery note. However it is allowing to create the Delivery note.
    Checked the correspoding  Schedule line  that was  determined : CB.
    CB in VOV6 the correct settins were made as below.
    The checks for
    Sched.line cat.        CB    Indiv.Purchase Order
    Movement Type         601   GD goods issue:delvy
    Order Type                NB    Purchase requisition
    Item Category             0     Standard
    Acct Assgt Cat.         M     Ind. cust. w/o KD-CO
    Incompl.proced.       31    Sched.Line w/PurReq.
    Here we have the purchase requistion number on the schedule line tab, and in VBAP could see the it as a special stock item with the indicator E.
    Ideally the flow is ONLY when the GOODS RECEIPT has done against this sales order stock, then the system should allow to create the deilvery.
    Checked the copy control settings in VTLA and for TAB the Data transfer routine is 101.
    Please help to understand why the system allows to create delivery when there is no GR made against this.
    Thanks in advance.
    Ram.

    Hi Navaneeth,
    Thanks for your response.
    What i need is the SYSTEM SHOULD NOT allow me to create the Delivery. In this case it is allowing me to create the Delivery.
    VOV7-TAB-> Special stock indicator is set as 'E'.
    Inspite of it is set as E the system is allowing and ONLY at the time of PGI it is looking for special stock and pops up with the error message:
    Sales order stock 6941 000010 does not exist
    Message no. M7184
    I expect the system should not allow to create the delivery at first chance.
    Please help if it requires any other settings?
    Best Regards,
    Ram

  • Trx VOV6

    Hi,
    I'm configuring entries in trx VOV6.
    There is a a schedule line category called "CB Indiv.Purchase Order".
    The above schedule line cat. has "Acct Assgt Cat"  = "M" (Ind. cust. w/o KD-CO).
    What effect has to set "Acct Assgt Cat"  = "M instead of "E" ?
    Regards

    Dear,
    Account assignment category E: The material is kept in sales order stock. The costs from the goods movements of the product are posted directly to the sales order.
    Account assignment category D: When you create a sales order, the system opens a sales order stock segment in the stock/requirements list. Revenues are posted to the project.
    Account assignment category M: to use valuated sales order stock without a Costing object.
    If you want to use the non-valuated sales stock (the field Valuation is blank) or to use sales order item to collect costs and revenues, change the field Account assignment category to E.
    Best Regards,
    Amit
    Note: In adition, also refer:
    [Definition: Account Assignment Category|About account assignment category]
    [Account assignment category U|Account Assignment category]

  • Missing CO Sales Order Item in 643 Cross Company Movement

    Hi all,
    we are working in a make-to-order scenario in which the company A/plant A sells a finished product produced by company B/plant B.
    The sales order item is a cost object (account assignment category E – “Ind. cust. w. KD-CO” is set in the requirement class in use) and is derived into the Transfer Order (Account Assignment tab) from production company B/plant B to selling company A/plant A.
    When we try to transfer the finished product from plant B to plant A by means of 643 movement the system provides error message  KI 235 – Account xxx requires an assignment to a CO object where xxx is the Cost Of Goods Sold for company B. This is due to the fact that FI is not able to derive the sales order item as a posting cost object.
    We have activated cross company  CO objects by deactivating the Company Code Validation indicator (field TKA00-RKBUK) for controlling area settings.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks in advance.
    PierGiorgio

    Hi Abhi,
    yes it is: "E" is the entry value in the field consumption of the requirement class involved.
    Thanks, PierGiorgio

  • No Accounting Document generated for goods issue in case of MTO scenario

    Hi all,
    I have MTO scenario & the industry is trading. So I have all trading goods. In SPRO - Sales & Distribution - Availability Check and Transfer of Requirements - Transfer of Requirements - Determination Of Requirement Types Using Transaction I have determined requirement type as KE.
    In material master I have used strategy group as 20 for Make to order scenario. In the settings "Determination Of Requirement Types Using Transaction" I have determined the requirement type as "KE".
    The requirement type "KE" determines a requirement class "040 - MkToOrdNoValW/o cons". Here the account assignment category is "E-Ind. cust. w. KD-CO".
    Now I created a sales order, the system determined the requirement type as "KE". I saved the sales order, assigned the stock to the sales order  & created a delivery.
    I did the PGI also. But when I check in the document flow, for the material document the system has not generated any FI document where we see the accounting document for the "cost of goods sold" & "inventory" G/L accounts. The system gives a message "Material document 4900000023 does not include an accounting document".
    Note:
    1. When I create the sales order with normal MTS scenario, the system creates an accounting document for the material document at the time of goods issue.
    2. The valuation class in the material is 3100 for trading goods.
    3. The following settings have been made in OBYC.
    for GBB, the G/L accounts have been assigned for general modifier "BSA", "VAX", "VAY" & "VKA".
    Please suggest me as to where i am missing any settings.
    With best regards,
    Niyaz Sayyed.

    Dear Niyaz Sayyed
    You need to check in the following areas:-
    -  check whether the material is defined as non-valuated stock
    -  go to OME9, select your Account Assignment and see whether you have checked the box "GR non-valuated".   It should not  have been checked
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Item category in 3rd party scenario

    my scenario is i am using Q as an item category in sales order and through that PR is triggered and the same item category will be flow from PR to GRN.Problem is that i want to make the mat code to 1st come in to inventory after that i make the consumption booking.
    Kindly help.

    Hi,
    Have link from SO to PR and PR to PO and then GR wrt PO.Use Account Assignment Category M( in PR & PO) which  is mainly used like scenarios compare to for Make to Stock (Ind. cust. w/o KD-CO) where stock post to inventory account
    More check linkS:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/90/ba6cad446711d189420000e829fbbd/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/42/d7248ab27111d19e9a080009b0db33/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/97/f42c7dd435d1118b3f0060b03ca329/content.htm
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Issue at the time of creation of transfer order for inbound delivery

    Hello,
    I am facing one issue at the time of creation of transfer order for inbound delivery.
    If I create inbound delivery for purchase order with account assignment as 'M' (Ind. cust. w/o KD-CO), inbound delivery is not updated. Also document flow for inbounde delivery s not updated. I can create N number of transfer orders for on inbound delivery. Need help to resolve issue.
    If I create inbound delivery for purchase order with account assignment other than 'M' (Ind. cust. w/o KD-CO), inbound delivery and document flow is updated.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Nikhil

    Hi
    In OMS2 t-code
    for your material type and  plant ,you have to mark value based and qunaity based updation mark
    Regards
    kailas Ugale

  • Problem in multiple acct. assignment

    Dear cons
        While creating a pur. Req. (T-code- me51n) with  Multiple acct.assignment (p). The system gives an error message that Multi acct. assgt. not allowed for ind. cust. req. or engineer-to-order
    Message no. 06268
    Diagnosis
    Multiple account assignment is not defined for items with account assignment to "individual customer requirement" or "manufacture for individual project" (engineer-to-order).
    This means that you can only enter one account assignment item in the case of individual customer requirement or engineer-to-order. Pl. give me in details where can I MAKE SETTING SO THAT I CAN DO THE MULTIPLE ACCT. ASSIGNMENT.

    Hi,
    Please follow as shown below
    SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Account Assignment>Maintain Account Assignment Categories
    here select your industry sector and click Details on top  and in the field ID: AcctAssgt Scrn you can choose multiple account.
    Reward points if useful.
    Thx
    Raju

  • Purchase requisition creation (STO) from Sales order

    Hi Gurus,
    Read the following scenario:
    Sales order is created with delivery plant A. No stock on plant A.
    Purchase requisition is created from plant B to plant A (intra-company flow or stock transfer order).
    Problem is that the purchase requisition needs a price. It is not logical because intra-company flow (stock transfer in same company flow) is like a stock transfer without purchasing. So in my mind, I don't have to maintain price.
    Also if I use ME27 to create manually STO between both plants, price is not asked.
    Other question is: is it possible to create directly a purchase order when sales order creation (and not purchase requisition, newt convert into PO)?
    Many thanks.
    Stéphane

    Hi Stéphane Vituret, Did you manage to find a solution for this. I have a similar problem as well.
    Please find the scenario below.
    Cusotmer places order of Mat-XX to Company A. The Company A creates PO to Company B. Company B delivers to Company A and then invoices Company A. Company A receives the goods into own stocks. Now the Company A delivers to the customer from its own stocks and then invoices Customer.
    I decide to go ahead with the Individual Purchase order solution and since the Company A is buying from Comapny B, I decided to integrate the Cross Company STO flow in the procurement part. Hence the flow in SAP is like;
    Cusotmer placese order to Company A
    Comapny A creates a Individual Purchase order type Sales order. So the Item category is TAB.
    This sales order generates a PR. PR is conveted into a CC_STO as thenvendor is Plant B in this case . Now this STO appears in the delivery due list of plant B.
    Now I genreate the delivery to move stocks from plant B(of co.cd B) to Plant A(of co.cd A).
    Here is the problem. I am not able to do PGI as the system checks for "sales order" stock at plant B and throws error
    "Sales order stock 36637 000010 does not exist". This should not be the case as the stocks should get attached to the sales order only when recieved into Plant A. Hence system should not check for "sales order stock" at plantB while trying to deliver from Plant B to Plant A.
    Lets take a normal IPO scenario.
    CusotmerA places order of Mat-A to Company A. This sales order generates a PR. The Company A converts the PR into a std.PO to external vendor. The PO from the sales order will have a account assignment "M- Ind. cust. w/o KD-CO". The stocks will be received into Plant with spl indicator "E" while GR (MIGO). Now the system ensures that this stock can only be delivered against the particular sales order. Thus the stock procured for the customerA is delivered to customerA and not consumed by anybody else. In this case there is only one delivery involved, in SAP, which is 601 mvmt type from the Plant A.
    However if the vendor becomes another Plant (Plant B) belonging to another company code then there are two deliveries involved in the SAP system one with mvmt type 643, from Plant B to Pant A, and the second with 601 from Plant A to the customer. Hence the system should check if the stocks are attached with a spl indicator only during the second delivery of 601 mvmt type. I am facing a problem because the system does it for the first delivery itself. If you know the answer please do let me know. I really appreciate it. Thanks a lot in advance.

Maybe you are looking for