ACE-SLB Multiple VIPs to Same Rservers

ACE module (on C6509) is currently configured to support client/server connections to several application servers.
VIP#1 on ACE exists within a single client side subnet (int vlan111)
Real servers exist on a separate server side subnet (int vlan555)
ACE is configured with a single default route pointing to a router on the client side subnet (int vlan111)
Customer wants to add a new VIP#2 that will exist on a new client side subnet (int vlan222)
Customer wants this new VIP#2 to be load balanced to the same application servers, exactly the same as VIP#1.
The problem I suspect is that the ACE's existing default route (via int vlan111) will cause all VIP#2 server-to-client traffic flows to be forwarded via int vlan111 instead of int vlan222 and thereby break the VIP#2 server-to-client traffic flows.
Assuming I'm correct, is there an ACE based solution to this, or is this desired environment just not possbile.
NOTE: since both VIP#1 and VIP#2 clients will be any public IP addressed hosts, I cannot define multiple routes based on discrete destination network addresses; therefore a single default route is all that's possible to use.

You should be able to configure VIP#2 on the same client-interface (Vlan111), even if the new VIP doesn't belong to the address-range Vlan111 resides in. That way all client traffic is forwarded to the same interface and your routing issue should be erdicated.
Simply configure your VIP#2 class and apply the same lb-policies etc. in your multimatch-policy, which is already applied to Vlan111. Then, add a static route on your router, using the Vlan111-address (or alias-address) as next-hop. This should work, I've configured this myself.
hth

Similar Messages

Multiple VIPs per VR

hello,
is it possible to configure multiple VIPs for the same virtual-router on a particular circuit configuration which uses the same redundant-interfaces instead of having to configure redundant-interfaces for each VIP that's added?
I want to do something along the lines of:
ip virtual-router 1 priority 200 preempt
ip redundant-interface 1 192.168.3.254
ip redundant-vip 1 192.168.3.100
ip redundant-vip 1 192.168.3.120
ip redundant-vip 1 192.168.3.140
and then do different things for traffic going to each of these VIPs in my content rules, i.e. have different content-rules for each VIP so different operations can be performed on them.
Currently, although the CSS lets me do this kind of thing, AND the newly created VIPs can be seen in the ARP tables of other network devices in that broadcast domain, I can't seem to ping these VIPs.
Thanks in advance

Hi Gilles, thx for that. So basically what you're saying is that if I have a VIP configured but the content rule that uses this is inactive/suspended OR say the backend server is dead or unreachable for any reason, the ping to the VIP will not be replied to? For some reason I was under the impression that if I configure the VIP in the circuit, I will be able to ping it but now the other way makes more sense.
Now the other question is, if I have all these VIPs as in my original question, and they ALL need SSL termination on the CSS AND they all point to different sub-domains AND I have a wildcard SSL cert for that parent domain, then can I create multiple ssl-server entries in my ssl-proxy-list BUT use the same certificate for each ssl-server in the list?
Not sure if that's clear, let me know and I will provide more detail
Thanks in advance

Combining multiple VIP addresses in Mail

Is there a way to combine multiple email addresses under the same VIP in Mountain lion's Mail? I have 4 or 5 email addresses for a contact and as such have 5 different VIP inboxes for this person when one would be perfect.
Any help would be great.
thanks!

This solved it for me: before, two VIPs with same name, but was same person with two different email addresses; added both email addresses to that person in Contacts, restarted mail, and voila now one entry in VIP list for this guy. Thanks ddarby08!

Stickyness across multiple VIPs

I was wondering if anyone knows if it is possible to implement stickyness across multiple VIPs. In other words, if a client hits a specific VIP on a specific TCP port, then hits a different VIP on a different tcp port, can stickyness be configured to stick that client to the same server?
Thanks!

Hi,
u talk about stickineess on the CSM? it's possible :), but be careful...
example:
vserver1: vip1:port1
rserver1: rserver_ip1:portX
vserver2: vip2:port2
rserver2: rserver_ip1:portY
and one sticky group for both server farms (one for rserver1, second for rserver2).
first session is established to vserver1:
- sticky is recorded to rserver1 (rserver_ip1:portX)
second session is established to vserver2:
- sticky exists (client matched the sticky rule)
- session is not load-balanced, but connected to rserver by sticky record (!), in other words, session is directed to rserver_ip1:portX and no to :portY
^^^ answer to your question: it's possible :), but be careful... in other words, it's possible if the service on the server side is running on the same real server and port (portX=portY). other, use different sticky group for second server farm.
is it answer to your question?
regards,
martin

ACE 4710 multiple services running on load balanced Servers

Our Exchange 2010 hub servers run multiple services/ports: smtp, www, pop3,135, 143, https, 993, 995, 6001,6002,6003,60200,60201,8400, and 8402
what is the best way of balancing these servers so that if only one of the services failed on a server, it would switch only the failed service to remaining servers.
At present I only use an smtp probe, so as log as that sevrice is running the server is marked good. It seems to me the setup could get quite complicated so any responses welcome.

Jorge,
Please see config below
logging enable
logging buffered 5
logging monitor 5
access-list ALL line 10 extended permit ip any any
access-list ALL line 18 extended permit icmp any any
ip domain-name simplot.com.au
ip name-server 172.16.7.210
ip name-server 172.16.5.228
probe icmp icmp
interval 7
faildetect 2
passdetect interval 30
passdetect count 2
receive 5
probe tcp tcp25
port 25
interval 20
passdetect interval 60
passdetect count 2
open 1
rserver host chihub73
description hub73
ip address 172.16.6.196
inservice
rserver host chihub74
description hub74
ip address 172.16.6.197
inservice
serverfarm host Exchange
description DSI servers
failaction purge
probe tcp25
fail-on-all
rserver chihub73
inservice
rserver chihub74
inservice
sticky ip-netmask 255.255.255.255 address source Sticky
serverfarm Exchange
class-map type management match-any EXCH
201 match protocol snmp any
202 match protocol https any
203 match protocol telnet any
204 match protocol icmp any
class-map match-any EXCH_vip
2 match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq smtp
3 match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq www
4 match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq pop3
5 match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 135
6 match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 143
7 match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq https
8 match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 993
9 match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 995
10 match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 6001
11 match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 6002
12 match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 6003
13 match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 60200
14 match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 60201
15 match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 8400
16 match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 8402
policy-map type management first-match EXCHANGE
class EXCH
permit
policy-map type loadbalance first-match ldap-slb
class class-default
sticky-serverfarm Sticky
policy-map multi-match multi-vips
class EXCH_vip
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy ldap-slb
loadbalance vip icmp-reply
nat dynamic 6 vlan 93
interface vlan 93
description client server vlan
ip address 172.16.93.4 255.255.255.0
peer ip address 172.16.93.1 255.255.255.0
access-group input ALL
nat-pool 6 172.16.93.8 172.16.93.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 pat
service-policy input EXCHANGE
service-policy input multi-vips
no shutdown
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.93.254
snmp-server contact "Comms team"
snmp-server location "Chifley park CR"
snmp-server community OVSimplot group Network-Monitor
snmp-server trap-source vlan 93

How can I print multiple copies of same photo onto one page on iPhoto 9.5.1?

How can I print multiple copies of same photo onto one page on iPhoto 9.5.1? I was able to do it on the old iPhoto, but can't seem to be able to do it on the new iPhoto. Grrr...

Photos does the same thing.... Only workaround I can come up with is to create a template in Pages and copy & paste.

How to restrict login for multiple users having same Role

Our Web Application is deployed on Tomcat 5.5
The requirement is ?
There are roles in application like "operator", "admin"?
There are multiple users created for each of the above role.
When one user of "operator" role is logged in, then
It should not allow to login for another user of "operator" role.
Also, if user did not log out & application gets close, then
It should not allow to login for another user of "operator" role.
Also, it should not allow to login for multiple requests of same user
(using another browser instance...)
Is it possible using session object?
But, using session object, it will create separate objects for different users,
So here I will not be able to restrict session object creation rolewise.
Also, how to retrieve these multiple session objects created for different users on server?
If anyone is having the solution please reply as soon as possible,
Thank you.

To tell you the truth, this is a stupid requirement. It must be an extremely fragile application.
In any case, you will have to write your stuff for that. Probably a filter that on login, logout, and session expiration checks, makes, or removes entries in a DB (using a synchronized resource to prevent race conditions) or possibly even simply in an application context object.

How to update software on multiple iPhones using same iTunes account?

How to update software on multiple iPhones using same iTunes account?

SeanB15 wrote:
Here are more details on my situation which should help clarify things...
I purchased three iPhone 4 models back when they first came out (for my family) that all share the same iTunes account for access to apps and music, but each phone/user still has his/her custom contact list, email accts, and select lists of apps and music from the one iTunes acct library. The problem is (as I understand it) that I can only update the software on one of the three iPhones – the primary phone I used to setup the iTunes acct without wiping out the separate contact lists, etc. As it stands today... the first (primary) iPhone associated with the iTune acct has been updated with the latest software version 5.1.1 and sync'd up with all the apps, music, etc from the one iTune acct, while the other two iPhones are still running on the original software version 4.0.2 and are experiencing problems now. I was advised by AT&T back in January that it would be necessary to setup separate iTunes accts for the second and third iPhones in order to receive system updates and still be able to manage separate contact lists, etc. If I go this route, I assume we will lose all the apps on phones #2 and #3 that we have been "sharing"... correct? Since this AT&T advice was prior to iCloud coming out, would iCloud be a better solution or at least part of the solution? I really don't yet understand how iCloud works. Hopefully, one of you can help me??
we have 2 iphone 4's synced to the same itunes account for apps and music since the day we bought them, but each has a different icloud acct. they have both been updated on the same itunes account with every update that has come out since we bought them in december of 2010. nothing on either phone has ever been lost or duplicated. having said all that, maybe i'm missing something here, but we have had no problems. we do have itunes setup to sync manually. i do believe i'm a piker compared to lawrence finch, but i'm just telling you what happens in my house. maybe check with apple? is there a store near you?

How to use/sync single data (file) across multiple instances of same application

Currently we have an application (a diagram editor), that have the ability to save and load (serialize) its state in a xml file.
Now we want this application to behave like Microsoft OneNote application. Where multiple users have the ability to access the same file.
Later we may also need to enhance with other things like, (1)what is changed and who changed it, (2)option to resolve conflicts if any.
I came to know about sync framework to resolve this. so far, i have not tried it.
All i want is,
Virtually single file should be edited by multiple instances of same application.
We need a dll (sync framework) that does following
It takes complete responsibility of file handling.
Using this dll, each instance of the application will notify their own changes.
Each instance of the application should have the ability to detect the changes that is recently made (when, who, what are the changes).
My question:
Will sync framework be suitable for this requirement?
If so, is there a demo application that represents this?
- Jegan

Seems like I have found the solution.
In the taskflow there is a property named data-control-scope and I set it to isolated instead of the default (shared) and this seemed to do the trick.
I can now have two instances of the same taskflow running with different ApplicationModules
Cheers,
Mark

Multiple copies of same emails

Hey,
My problem started few days ago, I received multiple copies of same emails (about 5 copies/email). Now I tried to delete those copies using the plugin (Remove multiple messages) but it doesn't seem to delete. Still shows same amount of emails (about 35000), about 28000 needs to be deleted, in my inbox folder.
So when I try to get new emails, it says hard-drive is full etc... it isn't full. Webmail works great, but only have the latest 7days emails.
I'm using POP. please help to fix this fast.

Were you able to resolve this problem? I have the same issue, but on a macbook pro.

Multiple copies of same photo on same page seems to assume A4?

I'm trying hard to work out how to print out multiple copies of the same picture. I want to get 2 copies on each 4x6" sheet of photo paper and have followed all the steps...
Selected 1 picture, hit print, went to Settings, selected "Multiple of the same photo per page".
I then went to Print Settings, selected Borderless 4x6 (yes, the printer works fine with that usually - HP Photosmart C4280) and set the Print Size to 2x3 and the preview shows the 2 copies of the same photo side-by-side no problem.
So I hit OK, clicked on Print and...
It's not aligning with the left hand side of the 4x6 - it's not respecting the selected paper size. If I put in a sheet of A4 to test, the 2 pictures come out in the centre of the page (in the requested size). So as a result I can't print on the 4x6 paper as most of the picture gets printed on nothing!
Am I doing something wrong or is this some kind of bug in either iPhoto or the HP printer driver? Anyone had any success with this? If so, what kind of printer were you using?

Jemster:
Here's the workflow I used to get 2 2x3s on a 4x6:
1 - select photo & click on print button
2 - select 4x6 borderless and 2x3 print size
3 - click Customize button
4 - click on settings button
5 - select "Multiple of same photo per page" (after clicking OK two photo are shown on the preview)
6 - click on the Print button.
Where I differ is that I don't go back to Print Settings to select the 4x6 paper size after Step 5. Give that a try.
NOTE: Do a Print to PDF to check it out instead of printing on paper. That will save some paper in case it doesn't work.
That gives me two photos on the 4x6. I'm using a Canon i850. I also get the same results with an Epson R280.
TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto (iPhoto.Library for iPhoto 5 and earlier) database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger or later), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 6 and 7 libraries and Tiger and Leopard. Just put the application in the Dock and click on it whenever you want to backup the dB file. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.
Note: There's now an Automator backup application for iPhoto 5 that will work with Tiger or Leopard.

How do you share Aperture file across multiple users on same Mac?

How do you share Aperture file across multiple users on same Mac? Seems this should be a preferences choice.

When you share your library between users, you may run into permission and ownership problems, if both users are editing the Aperture library and not only reading it. To avoid that, it helps to put the Aperture library onto a separate disk or a separate partion of your hard drive. For s separate partition or disk you can enable the "ignore ownership on this volume" flag. Then all users can access the library as owners of this library.
You might try to put the aperture library into a shared folder on your mac, but that has caused problems recently, i.e. when the library also contains video files.
Regards
Léonie

How to create multiple instance on same database

Hi ,
I would like to know how to create multiple instance on same database . I know that some people use database configuration assistant to do this but i could not figure out how they did it.
Any how if some one can help me with this and can give me links of this it would be great help for me.
Thank you for reading my problem and helping me !
Amil
please if possible mail me on [email protected]

How to create multiple instance?????Do you mean multiple instances on the same database, or multiple databases on the same machine ?
I m new to this field....
Willin to learn a lot about oracle....Then it wouldn't be bad reading a bit of Database Concepts

TS4006 can you have multiple phones on same user email

can you have multiple phones on same user email

If you mean can they share the same iCloud account, yes. Just be aware that when multiple devices share the same iCloud account, any data they sync with the account will be merged and the merged data will appear on all of the devices. Also, any action taken on one device (such as adding or deleting contacts) will also be taken on all other devices sharing the account. Finally, the iCloud backups of all the devices will share the same iCloud storage space.

How to stop this multiple entry against same condition type in pricing

My client is using manual condition type for the basic price "ZBPR". Now system allowing multiple entry against this condition type in the pricing screen during order creation i.e in the first line if we put ZBPR 00 , in the second line system allowing to put another value against same ZBPR say for example 2000 & doing all subsequent calculations on the basis of 3000 .which is not at all acceptable by my client .Please suggest how to stop this multiple entry against same condition type

You have to make the condition type as Mandatory and not manual.
If you are entering many condition records of the ZPR0 then the latest entry will be taken for further processing for subtotal rebate and total price.
For all the other entered condition records will have yellow traffic signal which is not active.
you can assign a routine with the help pf your abaper...
In the Transaction VOFM define a requirement such that
you condition type takes value only one at the time of order entry.
regards,
Amlan Sarkar

ACE-SLB Multiple VIPs to Same Rservers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for