ACH pmt

When doing F110 with ACH CCD as payment method, I am getting following error:
No variants found for format ACH
No Payment Media Created in Format 100
What am I missing.

Frank,
Prima facie, it seems that your program ZRFFOUS_T has the payment method "T" hard-coded somewhere in its code. That's why it seems to disregard "W"; have your ABAPer check it out.
Meanwhile, you might want to check the customizing for "W" and ensure that payment advice is allowed in the payment method - under company code data for the payment method, make sure that payment advice is NOT marked as NONE or NoPytAdv - it should work then.
I take it the decision to now use "W" in addition to "T" is something that's already been evaluated by you / your team, and so is not open to interpretation. Still, you might want to think once if what you want to achieve by using "W" can be achieved even by using "T", using some other means / field ...!
Regards
Gulshan

Similar Messages

  • Creation of ACH pmt advice for EU C.Cd (PMW activated)

    Hi experts,
    I'm a little at loss with my 1st dealings with the payment medium workbench. I got a requirement to setup payment advice a EU company code that currently sends out ACH payments without advice.
    Currently In FBZP,
    1- The EU CCd is a paying company and the form is the same Z_REMITT_S used for the client's US company.
    2- The ACH payment method is defined for the country. The medium is the payment medium workbench and the format is Z_SEPA_CT.
         The US company uses the classic workbench and program RFFOUS_T for ACH.
    3- In Define Payment Method for Company code, I hit a snag because Under Form Data, there is only the "Drawer on the Form" segment; the entire "Forms" segment where you'd select your script is missing.
    Bottom line is How do I set up payment advice for ACH for a EU company paying EU vendors? (am I even asking the right question here?)

    maybe OP want to extract all numbers from his inbox using regular expressions?

  • Configuration of ACH and WIRES as payment methods

    I chose the correct program in Classic Payment Medium which is RFFOUS_T to make payments by WIRES. When I go to paymetn run, in the proposal log I get the following messages:
    Due items with currency USD, pmnt method - items total is > 0
    Message no. FZ328
    ...none of the payment methods defined can be used for these items
    Message no. FZ347
    ... payment not possible because of reported error
    Message no. FZ311
    Information re. vendor 1000000/ paying company code ABCD ...
    Message no. FZ305
    payments by EDI / IDoc generation
    Message no. FZ797
    IDOcs were generated for the following entries
    Message no. FZ760
    Diagnosis
    A payment IDoc is created for each individual payment. The configuration settings governing this are made in the table containing the EDI-compatible house banks and payment methods.
    System Response
    The house banks and payment methods in question are displayed.
    I have done all the configuration correctly as far as setting up the pmt method. It also exists in vendor master. Where am I going wrong.
    My understanding is that when we use classic payment medium program for WIRES and ACH it is RFFOUS_T. Let me know if my understanding is corrrect? Is there any form that I need to define in SAPscript or any other configuration required from my part. Also if you can tell me how do we distinguish between ACH and WIRES because they use the same payment medium program RFFOUS_T.
    If anyone can provide me with step by step configuration of WIRES in SAP, it will help a great deal and will help me figure out where am I going wrong. Also i someone can tell me the difference in configuration of ACH and WIRES??
    Would like to thank in advance if my problem gets resolved and will definitely assign points.

    The need to define "wires" is purely business decession. If the users want to identify the vendors and restrict mode of payment to "wires" only, then you go for that.
    Just add this method to the vendor master data.
    reward if useful.
    sarma

  • PMW/ACH Vendor Payments - Batch Header Record (5) not in file

    We're trying to get PMW/ACH vendor payments up and running, and thought we were about ready to send a test file to the bank, but I've discovered we have no batch header (record type 5) in the file?
    We're configured to use the PMW.  I have checked and rechecked our configuration, but must be missing something?  We have payment methods and banks configured.  Variants defined and bank/master data set up on a few vendors for testing. Everything else seems to be working fine. A small test via F110 selects these vendors into the file for payment, prints advices, and posts FI documents in SAP properly. I have record types 1, 6, 8, and 9 in the file...but no 5 (Batch Header).
    Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Lisa Tanner

    Record 5 is defined by the Format Supplement in FBZP, Payment method/country. Here you will find 3 supplements CTX, CCD and PPD.

  • TS3367 We have 2 iPad2s on the same iTunes account how do we face time ach other?

    We have 2 iPad2s on the same iTunes account how do we face time ach other?

    Some users create another Apple ID just to use for FaceTime and Messages, but I have 4 devices using both apps and I use one Apple ID on all four. I added another email address on the other devices as the contact at email address and kept the Apple ID email address on my iPad as the contact at email address.
    Settings>FaceTime>You can be reached for FaceTime at>Add another email address. Add the email address, Apple will verify it. Go to the InBox of that email account, read the email from Apple, follow the instructions to complete the verification. Go back to Settings>FaceTime and uncheck the Apple email address and check the address that you just added. You can also tap on the blue arrow next to the Apple ID email address and remove it in the next window if you like.
    Do the same thing in Messages and ...obviously you need another working email address. You can use your wife's own email address on her iPad as the contact at address.

  • Payment advice required on ACH file to bank

    Hi Folks,
    My client have a requirement to add payment advice to ACH payment file to bank. I'm generating the DME file (ACH payments ) correctly and are able to print payment advices. I want the payment advice to be added to the DME file; When, I unchecked the
    the print control for printing payment advices, the payment advices are not added to the ACH or DME file.
    If I check the flag "individual payment" on vendor master ( means separate payment for each invoice), then the payment advices are added as a separate record on the payment file. However, we don't want individual payment for each invoice in the case of multiple invoices to the same vendor.
    Does any anyone have any idea how to fix this? I search for an OSS note but didn't find any.
    Thanks for your help.
    Tony

    Hi Tony
    Acc to my knowledge, usually we would maintain an advice note against an invoice like a reference. So Std SAP might not able to pick that adivce for multiple invoices. Which might be correct.
    I would suggest you take the help of an ABAPer to see from where it picks up the data during the individual payment and if that same field is getting  populated during the multiple (which might not be happening).
    Please, correct me if my understanding of the process is wrong.
    Regards
    Nikhil

  • ACH Edi  error report

    I am currently working on setting up ACH process for a client using the SAP's standard IDOC process. Once the bank receives the ACH Idoc, if there any errors such as vendor account number missing, they send an edi error file back. Client is asking if there a way to set up SAP to automatically reverse the payment for that particular vendor upon receiving the error file from the bank.
    Please advice if anybody has experience with this scenario.

    user3045615 wrote:
    Returns: Error report - Connection reset by peer: socket write error when executing SQL script in an Oracle 12.1.0.2.0 Enterprise Edition database (residing on a remote Microsoft Windows x86 64-bit) user schema (datamart).
    Initially, the error occured when the script attempted to compile a PL/SQL package body (1125 lines of code). Another script successfully compiled 4 larger PL/SQL package bodies (all exceed 1125 lines of code) in a different user schema (staging).
    Now, the error occurs in staging user schema when calling a PL/SQL package.
    Ray
    Is GOOGLE broken for you?
    sockets - What does "connection reset by peer" mean? - Stack Overflow
    I am not convinced that your error has much, if anything, to do with Oracle.
    In the future use COPY & PASTE so we can really see what you actually do & what the complete response is.

  • Bank Transfer file: generate two outgoing files for one pmt method?

    Hello Experts,
    Two files (header and item) are expected from the hungarian bank for each payement.
    It's possible to generate two outgoing files for one pmt method using DMEE tree? If yes, can you tell me how?
    If not, there is an other solution? Use a classic program (copy and adaptation) for example?
    Thank you in advance.
    Amal

    Are you sure you need separate files file header and items.
    Usually both header and items are placed in the same file. Please reconfirm or get the formats from the Bank.

  • Configuring ACH IAT payment method

    Hello Experts,
    We are trying to implement a new payment method (ACH IAT) for client's vendor payments. IAT is a new standard class entry (SEC) code that will replace the CBR and PBR SEC codes currently in use today. NACHA rules will require the IAT code and format of all ACH payments entering or exiting the U.S.
    As this is a newly introduced payment method SAP had introduced an OSS note (sapnote_0001343600) in 2009 which we had successfully implemented. After a payment process the system is successfully generating a DME file. It seems that the DME file which we have sent to the Bank is not complying to the exact format. Some of the errors pointed out are :
    I am also listing the problem data points that business has highlighted :
    1. Record Type 6 u2013 Position 4-12 : Should contain the standard Routing Number that indentifies US RDFI at which the receiver maintains the account. It is coming as 0
    2.Record Type 6 u2013 Position 13-16 : Number of addenda records associated with entry detail record. They should not be 0.
    3.Record Type 7 u2013 Addenda type code 14 u2013 Position 41-74 : Contains foreign RDFIu2019s routing/transit number. Some other value is appearing
    4.There should not be two record types of 7 u2013 Addenda Type code17.
    5.Record Type 7 u2013 Addenda type code 18 : Mandatory foreign bank info (Bank Name, Code for numbering scheme, Bank Identification number) missing completely.
    Looking forward to your valuable inputs from your end.
    Thanks and regards
    Anindya

    Hi Sheli,
    Thanks for the reply and sorry for the late response.
    I have already configured the particular structure for the DME file that has been generated. The issue here is with the data.
    May I ask whether it will be possible for you to kindly help out with the table from where the file is fetching these records. Couldn't figure out those exactly. I think most of the data are being fetched from REGUH, REGUP, REGUT tables but there are some places where the same data which needs to be repeated in another position is not getting populated. Thus I'm not sure whether the system is calling the same table the second time or its some other table.
    It will be of great help if you can help me out with the list of tables from which the DME file is getting prepared specially the following :
    1. Bank Routing Number
    2. Addenda records associated with entry detailed records
    3. Why there are two line items of 717
    4. Foreign Correspondent Bank Details
    Thanks in advance for the help.
    Have a nice day !
    Thanks and regards
    Anindya

  • Help with Form F110_US_DTA for ACH file to be sent to bank

    Hi ppl,
    I'm implementing new house bank in the system for ACH payments
    the NACHA file format for that bank is given to me.
    the bank's needs a variation in the format.
    they want effective entry date in the Batch Header Record 5, Pos 70-75 to be greater than the Creation Date located in the File Header Record 1
    Im using the form F110_US_DTA for the file that is to be generated to sent to bank
    How Do I make changes to this form to satisfy the requirement
    Or basically where do I change the format of forms like F110_US_DTA etc..
    What is T-code for that...
    Thank You Very much
    your help will be appreciated
    Also tell me how can I assign you points..

    An ACH NACHA file has the following components..
    File Header Record(1)
    This gain has many fileds like Record type code, priority code, immediate destination etc
    Batch header Record(5)
    Record type code, company Identification
    Entry Detail Record(6)
    Transactioncode, Check digit etc
    Addenda Record(7)
    Record Type Code...etc
    Batch Control Record(8)
    File Control Record(9)
    Batch Count, block count etc...
    Now This is the Layout which the company wants to implement
    The commpany is already using an ACH file for an old bank.
    But wants to implement a New Bank with a lil variation of old NACHA format
    In SAP where can I set these fields or parameters.....
    for some programs I can goto System->Status and double click on program and goto ABAP editor and change fields.
    But for this ACH where can go and set the parameters according to requirements
    There is actually one more requirement...
    In the ACH file The New banks wants the
    File Creation Date (It is entry in field no 5 of File Header Record(1) of ACH file)
    this date should be less than Effective Entry DAte (It is an entry in Field no 9 in Batch Header Record(5))

  • Create NACHA ACH File ... Company ID not correct

    We are trying to establish and new house bank-bank account- payment method for existing company code. Which generating the payment out of the housebank, the NACHA ACH Files is picking incorrect company code.
    The file came in with an incorrect  Immediate Origin ID &  Batch/Company IDu2019s:
        The Immediate Origin, File Header (1 Record), position14-23 has 1030391841; it should be 3030391841. - This was resolved by configuration in FBZP House Bank Company Number
        The Company ID, Batch Header (5 Record) position 41-50 has 1030391841; it should be 3030391841. - Dont know how to change this
        The Company ID, Batch Trailer (8 Record) position 45-54 has 1030391841; it should be 3030391841. - Dont know how to change this.
    Please help

    If you are using RFFOUS_T to create the ACH file, that program is hard coded to put a '1' in front of the company code TIN (as maintained in OBY6 in the Additional Data for the company code) on both the batch header and the batch trailer records.  To change the value, from '1' to a different value on these records, you have to code the logic into user exits.  The RFFOUS_T user exit for the batch header is ZXFORU24 (function module EXIT_RFFOEXIT_101).  The user exit for the batch trailer record is ZXFORU28 (function module EXIT_RFFOEXIT_105).
    Regards,
    Shannon
    Edited by: Shannon Moberg on Feb 10, 2011 1:14 PM

  • How to change ACH File ID Modifier in ACH CCD File in SAP SAPFPAYM program?

    Hi,
    We are using ACH CCD File transmission using PMW to send ACH file to get incoming customer payment to the bank. In one F110 run, we have multiple house banks in a single company code, so we will have three different files to send. Here our issue is since these three files are generated through a single payment run, the date and time stamp on the three files will be same so we will have the same File ID Modifier in the Header record of the ACH file. But bank is not able to identify these three files as unique files because the File ID Modifier is same for all three files. In SAP unless these files are generated at different time, they all will have same File ID Modifier. Now we need to change this as per banks requirement. Can any one please help me on how to do this?
    Thanks,
    Ramesh

    Hi Ramesh,
    Agree with your last comments about File ID of DMEE file.
    But if bank is same but has different accounts in different branches, to distinguish them we have SWIFT code or IBAN.
    The same file means the same DMEE generated file, probably with different tags with different data. As long as the final bank is same for ex. ICICI, it may have branches in different states but usually the format will be same for a bank , but the value of the tags may differ for different branches.
    Cheers,

  • ACH nacha format

    Hi guys,
    I'm using RFFOUS_T program with F110 to produce ACH file.
    I was able to transmit file to the bank via batch process but bank said that they have received errors on the file.
    Where do you correct these changes on ACH file or in configuration ? Here are some of the errors that they have mentioned.
    ON THE "5" RECORD IN FIELD 03 (POSITIONS 05-20) RECORD NUMBER 000002           
       ACTUAL CONTENT->                                                            
    ERROR: COMPANY NAME MISSING                                                                               
    ON THE "5" RECORD IN FIELD 05 (POSITIONS 41-50) RECORD NUMBER 000002           
       ACTUAL CONTENT->                                                            
    ERROR: FIELD CANNOT CONTAIN ALL SPACES                                                                               
    ON THE "5" RECORD IN FIELD 07 (POSITIONS 54-63) RECORD NUMBER 000002           
       ACTUAL CONTENT->                                                            
    ERROR: ENTRY DESCRIPTION MISSING                                                                               
    ON THE "5" RECORD IN FIELD 09 (POSITIONS 70-75) RECORD NUMBER 000002           
       ACTUAL CONTENT->                                                            
    ERROR: INVALID DATE VALUE                                                                               
    ON THE "6" RECORD IN FIELD 08 (POSITIONS 55-76) RECORD NUMBER 000003           
       ACTUAL CONTENT->                                                            
    ERROR: CUSTOMER NAME MISSING                                                                               
    ON THE "6" RECORD IN FIELD 11 (POSITIONS 80-87) RECORD NUMBER 000003           
       ACTUAL CONTENT->00000000                                                    
       EXPECTED VALUE->05310156                                                    
    WARNING: ORIGINATING BANK ID NOT SAME AS "1" RECORD                                                                               
    ON THE "6" RECORD IN FIELD 11 (POSITIONS 88-94) RECORD NUMBER 000003           
       ACTUAL CONTENT->0000000                                                     
    ERROR: SEQUENCE NUMBER NOT GREATER THAN PREVIOUS NUMBER                                                                               
    ON THE "8" RECORD IN FIELD 07 (POSITIONS 45-54) RECORD NUMBER 000004           
       ACTUAL CONTENT->1931175150                                                  
    WARNING: COMPANY ID NOT SAME AS "5" RECORD ID NUMBER       
    Thanks in anticipation,
    Manoj

    hi,
    Try with this report RFFOEDI1
    Rgds

  • ACH Payment Method for US Garnishments

    Hi Experts,
    We want to make Garnishment Support payments through ACH File instead of live AP Checks. I have a few queries:
    1) We do not want to disturb the existing functionality of disbursing empl's salary through ACH file using pgm RFFOUS_T
    But in case of garnishments Support payment, we want to generate the ACH file for the State Disbursement Unit using Payment Medium Workbench (PMW). Is this feasable.
    1) For example, let's say there is vendor (say 108001 )and there are three employees whose Support Garnishments are going to this vendor.
    Now If u201CIssue Separate Check to Vendor u201Cfield is checked in IT0194, does this ensure separate line items/entries for each employee in the ACH file.
    2) Can we assign only one Vendor (say 108001 ) everytime in IT0194 for any employee with Garnishment Category u2013 Support.
    3) Can a Vendor ask for the same ACH file in both the formats - CTX and CCD ? If yes, does that mean there will be two payment runs in FI, one for each format.
    Can you please help.
    Edited by: Somdeb Banerjee on Oct 7, 2010 12:11 PM

    Hello Somdeb,
    See my comments in bold.
    1) For example, let's say there is vendor (say 108001 )and there are three employees whose Support Garnishments are going to this vendor.
    Now If u201CIssue Separate Check to Vendor u201Cfield is checked in IT0194, does this ensure separate line items/entries for each employee in the ACH file. Yes it should create separate line item. At least it does for us. You can test it in your test system. We have custom remittance program for ACH. You can talk to your FI group and give them TP postings document number to identify if it creates separate line item.
    2) Can we assign only one Vendor (say 108001 ) everytime in IT0194 for any employee with Garnishment Category u2013 Support. Depends on the client and vendor requirement. IF all of your garnishments goes to same vendor then yes you can do that.
    3) Can a Vendor ask for the same ACH file in both the formats - CTX and CCD ? If yes, does that mean there will be two payment runs in FI, one for each format. Not sure about format. But you can search SMP about this.
    See, each one of your requirements are mostly functional. So treat them on a trial and error basis in test system.
    Let me know if you have further queries.
    Arti

  • ACH note to payee

    Hello,
    When using the ACH format the note to payee is not filled consistently. For example I have 5 payments in the file, but only 2 of them have a 7 record.
    I have checked the REGUP table and XBLNR is filled for all concerning 5 payments.  I use SAP standaard note to payee SAMPLE 01.
    anyone?
    Regards,
    DT123

    resolved

Maybe you are looking for