ACI-protected attributes exposed with attrs=ALL searches

With DS 6.0,
I've noticed that searches which don't request specific attributes (i.e. "attrs=ALL" in access log) can get results including attributes that should be unreadable according to ACIs. Conversely, some attributes which SHOULD be readable are not returned.
If the "should-be-unreadable" attributes are explicitly requested, they are not returned (as one would hope), and if the "should-be-readable" attributes are requested, they ARE returned (also as you'd hope). None of the involved attributes are operational.
I've noticed that if I search with "*" for the attribute request, the attribute list returned is correct and compliant with the active ACIs. But it seems like the attribute results for "attrs=ALL" searches can be very inaccurate, to the point of exposing attributes that should not be visible. I would think that results for attrs=ALL or attrs="*" searches should be identical, and comply with ACIs.
Anyone else seen something like this before?
Thank you,
-- George

George,
as much as I wan tto help there isn't quite enough here to really be able to figure it out. Here's what I can tell you: the ACIs have been tested and deliver the right attributes no matter how the request is made. I've just tried on DS 6.0 with ACIs and both variants of ldapsearch and what I get is consistent.
If you do reproduce this problem, I invite you to provide the following information:
1. enough of your DIT to see what to expect
2. Where your ACIs live
3. ACIs content
4. both ldapsearch queries
regards
-=arnaud=-

Similar Messages

How to retrieve all records with its all attributes???

Hi,
I am trying to query LDAP to get all the records with is all attributes using InitialDirContext.search method.
But I am getting exception as "Invalid Attribute exception".
For the search method i used filer as
String filter = "(&( uid =* ))";
String[] filterAttr = { "uid" };
SearchControls searchControl = new SearchControls();
searchControl.setSearchScope( SearchControls.SUBTREE_SCOPE );
results = dctx.search( PPL_DN, filter, searchControl );
Please help to resolve this...
Thanks in Advance
Regards,
Peri

Thanks for the reply,
It is working fine now.
I see with the outer part [(&(uid=*))] in filter is working fine in 32 bit JRE. where as in 64 bit JRE it is not working with the outer part.
In 64 bit i changed the filter to [uid=*] and it worked fine.
Can you please tell me why this difference is required in filter with respect to JRE.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Peri
Edited by: Peri K on Dec 28, 2011 8:27 AM

With Safari, No search results in password protected iWeb site on MobileMe

Hi,
I'm publishing my iWeb site to my ME.COM account.
I have the site password protected as offered in iWeb.
But when the site is password protected and I'm accessing the site with Safari the search with the search field in the site does not produce any results.
Only the message:
"Your search did not produce any results."
If I use FireFox everything works fine and the search provides the expected results.
Looks like there is a bug in Safari.
Thanks and Regards,
JO

ok, is working, now.

"Open With"- "Change All" corrupts your file (Resource forks, extended attributes, creation date)

I finally know why some of my files get corrupted.
If you use the following method to assign one kind of file to always open with the same application;
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Mac/10.6/en/8387.html
(File -> Get Info -> Open With -> Change All)
an extended attribute will be added to your file.
You can examine that by typing "ls -l" in Terminal. If you see an @-sign after permissions than you have an extended attribute in that file.
To see what it contains, type "xattr -l filname.jpg" in Terminal.
Besides that is adds an extended attribute (which can be deleted with the "xattr --help" command) the modification date of the selected file will be changed.
I think this is irritating because I wan't to keep my master photos with the same modification date as creation date.
What else does it effect besides the modification date and to add extended attributes? Does my metadata get intact?
(If you further want to make a backup copy on for example a FAT32 filesystem than your got a new problem. FAT32 doesn't support resource forks, so besides filename.jpg you will have an additional ._filename.jpg of 4kb)

Doesn't sound like there is any corruption going on to me. It may change the date modified, but that should be expected since you modified the file.

How to use a protected attribute of class cl_gui_alv_grid

Hello all,
       i have a scenario where i need to use the attribute 'm_appl_events' which is protected attribute. in need to add this event type into my events and add this to registered events.
    when i tried to use this with refrence to class i defined, it showing an error message 'access to protected attribute m_appl_events is not allowed. i already inherieted the cl_gui_alv_grid class into my class
     can any one please tell me how exactly could i use the protected attribute.
Thanks,
raju N

Hi Krishna,
Protected method or attrubute can be accessed through Inheritence or Friends functionality. So you can inheritence easily in you case . so that you can access the variable in the Inherited sub class only. So you can write 2 methods ie GET or SET ing the value of your protected method.
I think this informatio may help you.
Best Regards,
Vijay

Inherit protected attribute from a Super class

Hi All,
I am inheriting a standard class which has many instance protected attributes. how do i access the super classes protected attributes from the sub class. i.e i need the value present in the super class attribute to be used in a sub class method.
will i be able to get the value of an instance attribute??
Thanks in advance,
Arun.

Hi marc,
I was also wondering as to how we can make use of the public attributes in the sub classes.as in, what the syntax we need to follow.
It'd be great if you could give a simple example with one protecetd attribute accessed in the subclass.
I've written a sample prog.
REPORT YA_TEST_OO.
      CLASS s_abc DEFINITION
CLASS s_abc DEFINITION.
PRIVATE SECTION.
    DATA: d_abc TYPE i.
ENDCLASS.                    "s_abc DEFINITION
      CLASS sb_abc DEFINITION
CLASS sb_abc DEFINITION INHERITING FROM s_abc.
public SECTION.
DATA: sb_d_abc TYPE c." VALUE d_abc.
    METHODS: m_abc.
ENDCLASS.                    "sb_abc DEFINITION
      CLASS sb_abc IMPLEMENTATION
CLASS sb_abc IMPLEMENTATION.
METHOD m_abc.
   sb_d_abc = d_abc + 1.
ENDMETHOD.                    "m_abc
ENDCLASS.                    "sb_abc IMPLEMENTATION
It doesn't work though.
Thanx,
Zid.

How to change protected attribute?

Hi all,
This is the situation:
In standard SAP there is an object OBJ_A with a protected attribute ATTR_P. The object has a getter method for the attribute, but no setter.
My requirement:
i need to manipulate/change the protected attribute ATTR_P.
what i've tried so far:
I created my own class CL_Z which inherits from the class of OBJ_A. Then i created a method CHANGE_ATTR_P.
In a BADI where the standard object OBJ_A is available i instantiated my z-object OBJ_Z.
With casting, referencing etc i tried to get to the protected attribute. but no luck.
has anyone any suggestions?
Thanks alot.
Joris Bots

> In a BADI where the standard object OBJ_A is
> available i instantiated my z-object OBJ_Z.
> With casting, referencing etc i tried to get to the
> protected attribute. but no luck.
If the BADI gives you an object which has the type of the parent class then you cannot cast it into the subclass type. I doubt that there is any chance to change the protected attribute because it might be protected for a reason.
It would work if the protected class implements an interface and the getter method is defined in the interface but that is not the case, correct?
cheers
Thomas

In iTunes 11.0.2.26, an Albums search by track names returns albums as if they only have one track on them, but I still want to access the entire album. How can I have the search results show the entire album (with just the searched for name highlighted)?

Hello, all.
In iTunes 11.0.2.26, an Albums search by track names returns albums as if they only have one track on them, but I still want to access the entire album. How can I have the search results show the entire album (with just the searched for name highlighted)? For instance, I'm wanting to play an album with a particular track on it or I'm searching for albums that include that track. iTunes incorrectly assumes that all I'm after is that one track and then incorrectly displays the album as if there is only one ttrack on it. This is a bonkers default setting. Can I change this?

Click the search magnifying glass and uncheck "Search entire library".
Type in the name of the track.
Click the album of interest to show tracks.
Select the track.
Press the X in the search box to clear the search.
Double click the track you want to start playing first.
tt2

Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
with such simple but important tasks.
I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added.
One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based on your email history and social media accounts setup.
And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list) that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook 2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
random contacts.
From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
(And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave), no results are found at all.
Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields.
Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding their info and
I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing that would prevent them from showing up in results.
These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

Thanks for your reply.
1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book!
In summary:
We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

Itunes app no longer showing genres or the top charts/genius bar in the top bar ... it only displays a faint music in the centre with just the search box..why? i need them back:-(

itunes app no longer showing genres or the top charts/genius bar in the top bar ... it only displays a faint music in the centre with just the search box..why? i need them back:-(

The iTunes Store listing of your podcast is simply reflecting the contents of your podcast feed. Make sure all of the content you want displayed in the iTunes Store is still contained within your feed.
Are you able to supply your feed for reference?

Unable to update this object because the following attributes associated with this object have values that may already be associated with another object in your local directory services

Getting this error from DirSync
Unable to update this object because the following attributes associated with this object have values that may already be associated with another object in your local directory services: [UserPrincipalName
[email protected];]. Correct or remove the duplicate values in your local directory. Please refer to
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2647098 for more information on identifying objects with duplicate attribute values.
Quick eyeball and couldn't see the cause in the user account so used the script here:
http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/office/Fix-Duplicate-User-d92215ef
And got these outputs:
PS C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0> Export-OSCADUserPrincipalName -UserPrincipalName "[email protected]" -Path .\outputs.csv
WARNING: Cannot find objects with specified duplicate user principal name
[email protected]
Found 0 user(s) with duplicate user principal name.
Where to from here?
Richard P

Hi,
Did you talk about the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Sync tool ?
If yes, this issue occurs if one or more of the following conditions are true:
An object in the on-premises Active Directory has an SMTP address that's the same as the SMTP address of the object that's reporting the problem.
An object in the on-premises Active Directory has a mail attribute that's identical to the object that's reporting the problem.
An object already exists in your organizational account and has the same SMTP address or mail attribute as the object in the on-premises Active Directory
More detail information, please refer to:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2520976/en-us
[Troubleshooting] Unable to update this object because the following attributes associated with this object
http://blogs.technet.com/b/aadsyncsupport/archive/2014/05/20/troubleshooting-unable-to-update-this-object-because-the-following-attributes-associated-with-this-object.aspx
Regards.
Vivian Wang

Neen help with date range searches for Table Sources

Hi all,
I need help, please. I am trying to satisfy a Level 1 client requirement for the ability to search for records in crawled table sources by a date and/or date range. I have performed the following steps, and did not get accurate results from Advanced searching for date. Please help me understand what I am doing wrong, and/or if there is a way to define a date search attribute without creating a LOV for a date column. (My tables have 500,00 rows.)
I am using SES 10.1.8.3 on Windows 32.
My Oracle 10g Spatial Table is called REPORTS and this table has the following columns:
TRACKNUM Varchar2
TITLE Varchar2
SUMMARY CLOB
SYMBOLCODE Varchar2
Timestamp Date
OBSDATE Date
GEOM SDO_GEOMETRY
I set up the REPORTS table source in SES, using TRACKNUM as the Primary Key (unique and not null), and SUMMARY as the CONTENT Column. In the Table Column Mappings I defined TITLE as String and TITLE.
Under Global Settings > Search Attributes I defined a new Search Attribute (type Date) called DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY).
Went back to REPORTS source previously defined and added a new Table Column Mapping - mapping OBSDATE to the newly defined DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY) search attribute.
I then modified the Schedule for the REPORTS source Crawler Policy to “Process All Documents”.
Schedule crawls and indexes entire REPORTS table.
In SES Advanced Search page, I enter my search keyword, select Specific Source Group as REPORTS, select All Match, and used the pick list to select the DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY) Attribute Name, operator of Greater than equal, and entered the Value 01-JAN-07. Then the second attribute name of DATE_OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY), less than equals, 10-JAN-07.
Search results gave me 38,000 documents, and the first 25 I looked at had dates NOT within the 01-JAN-07 / 10-JAN-07 range. (e.g. OBSDATE= 24-MAR-07, 22-SEP-), 02-FEB-08, etc.)
And, none of the results I opened had ANY dates within the SUMMARY CLOB…in case that’s what was being found in the search.
Can someone help me figure out how to allow my client to search for specific dated records in a db table using a single column for the date? This is a major requirement and they are anxiously awaiting my solution.
Thanks, in advance….

raford,
Thanks very much for your reply. However, from what I've read in the SES Admin Document is that (I think) the date format DD/MM/YYYY pertains only to searches on "file system" sources (e.g. Word, Excel, Powerpoint, PDF, etc.). We have 3 file system sources among our 25 total sources. The remaining 22 sources are all TABLE or DATABASE sources. The DBA here has done a great job getting the data standardized using the typical/default Oracle DATE type format in our TABLE sources (DD-MON-YY). Our tables have anywhere from 1500 rows to 2 million rows.
I tested your theory that the dates we are entering are being changed to Strings behind the scenes and on the Advanced Page, searched for results using OBSDATE equals 01/02/2007 in an attempt to find data that I know for certain to be in the mapped OBSDATE table column as 01-FEB-07. My result set contained data that had an OBSDATE of 03-MAR-07 and none containing 01-FEB-07.
Here is the big issue...in order for my client to fulfill his primary mission, one of the top 5 requirements is that he/she be able to find specific table rows that are contain a specific date or range of dates.
thanks very much!

Need help with date range searches for Table Sources in SES

Hi all,
I need help, please. I am trying to satisfy a Level 1 client requirement for the ability to search for records in crawled table sources by a date and/or date range. I have performed the following steps, and did not get accurate results from Advanced searching for date. Please help me understand what I am doing wrong, and/or if there is a way to define a date search attribute without creating a LOV for a date column. (My tables have 500,00 rows.)
I am using SES 10.1.8.3 on Windows 32.
My Oracle 10g Spatial Table is called REPORTS and this table has the following columns:
TRACKNUM Varchar2
TITLE Varchar2
SUMMARY CLOB
SYMBOLCODE Varchar2
Timestamp Date
OBSDATE Date
GEOM SDO_GEOMETRY
I set up the REPORTS table source in SES, using TRACKNUM as the Primary Key (unique and not null), and SUMMARY as the CONTENT Column. In the Table Column Mappings I defined TITLE as String and TITLE.
Under Global Settings > Search Attributes I defined a new Search Attribute (type Date) called DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY).
Went back to REPORTS source previously defined and added a new Table Column Mapping - mapping OBSDATE to the newly defined DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY) search attribute.
I then modified the Schedule for the REPORTS source Crawler Policy to “Process All Documents”.
Schedule crawls and indexes entire REPORTS table.
In SES Advanced Search page, I enter my search keyword, select Specific Source Group as REPORTS, select All Match, and used the pick list to select the DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY) Attribute Name, operator of Greater than equal, and entered the Value 01-JAN-07. Then the second attribute name of DATE_OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY), less than equals, 10-JAN-07.
Search results gave me 38,000 documents, and the first 25 I looked at had dates NOT within the 01-JAN-07 / 10-JAN-07 range. (e.g. OBSDATE= 10-MAR-07, 22-SEP-07, 02-FEB-08, etc.)
And, none of the results I opened had ANY dates within the SUMMARY CLOB…in case that’s what was being found in the search.
Can someone help me figure out how to allow my client to search for specific dated records in a db table using a single column for the date? This is a major requirement and they are anxiously awaiting my solution.
Thanks very much, in advance….

raford,
Thanks very much for your reply. However, from what I've read in the SES Admin Document is that (I think) the date format DD/MM/YYYY pertains only to searches on "file system" sources (e.g. Word, Excel, Powerpoint, PDF, etc.). We have 3 file system sources among our 25 total sources. The remaining 22 sources are all TABLE or DATABASE sources. The DBA here has done a great job getting the data standardized using the typical/default Oracle DATE type format in our TABLE sources (DD-MON-YY). Our tables have anywhere from 1500 rows to 2 million rows.
I tested your theory that the dates we are entering are being changed to Strings behind the scenes and on the Advanced Page, searched for results using OBSDATE equals 01/02/2007 in an attempt to find data that I know for certain to be in the mapped OBSDATE table column as 01-FEB-07. My result set contained data that had an OBSDATE of 03-MAR-07 and none containing 01-FEB-07.
Here is the big issue...in order for my client to fulfill his primary mission, one of the top 5 requirements is that he/she be able to find specific table rows that are contain a specific date or range of dates.
thanks very much!

The collection you specified does not exists or is not registered with the ColdFusion Search Service.

While upgrading to CF7 from CF5, I am creating the new collections from Cf Admin. After creating, I indexed it from cf admin and then trying to search for the documents in that collection, and i am getting the following error. This was working yesterday. I have cheched the logs etc and nothing seems helpful in discovering what the issue is.
Document count is 11,745 and the size is 25,948 kb, which is not too much for a collection. I have tried to restart Cold Fusion Search Services and then ColdFusion Application services, but all in vain.
Any help on this would be greatly appreciated.
Detail
The collection you specified does not exists or is not registered with the ColdFusion Search Service.
Message
The collection rc_collectiom does not exist.
StackTrace
coldfusion.tagext.search.CollectionDoesNotExistException: The collection rc_collectiom does not exist. at coldfusion.tagext.search.SearchTag.verifyLocale(SearchTag.java:819) at coldfusion.tagext.search.SearchTag.doSearch(SearchTag.java:200) at coldfusion.tagext.search.SearchTag.doStartTag(SearchTag.java:159) at coldfusion.runtime.CfJspPage._emptyTag(CfJspPage.java:1915) at cfeFull2dText2dReDirect2ecfm511389924.runPage(C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\External\FullText\eFull- Text-ReDirect.cfm:43) at coldfusion.runtime.CfJspPage.invoke(CfJspPage.java:152) at coldfusion.tagext.lang.IncludeTag.doStartTag(IncludeTag.java:349) at coldfusion.runtime.CfJspPage._emptyTag(CfJspPage.java:1915) at cfApplication2ecfc179940445$funcONREQUEST.runFunction(C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\External\Applica tion.cfc:114) at coldfusion.runtime.UDFMethod.invoke(UDFMethod.java:344) at coldfusion.runtime.UDFMethod$ReturnTypeFilter.invoke(UDFMethod.java:290) at coldfusion.runtime.UDFMethod$ArgumentCollectionFilter.invoke(UDFMethod.java:254) at coldfusion.filter.FunctionAccessFilter.invoke(FunctionAccessFilter.java:56) at coldfusion.runtime.UDFMethod.runFilterChain(UDFMethod.java:207) at coldfusion.runtime.UDFMethod.invoke(UDFMethod.java:169) at coldfusion.runtime.TemplateProxy.invoke(TemplateProxy.java:194) at coldfusion.runtime.TemplateProxy.invoke(TemplateProxy.java:146) at coldfusion.runtime.AppEventInvoker.invoke(AppEventInvoker.java:72) at coldfusion.runtime.AppEventInvoker.onRequest(AppEventInvoker.java:178) at coldfusion.filter.ApplicationFilter.invoke(ApplicationFilter.java:215) at coldfusion.filter.RequestMonitorFilter.invoke(RequestMonitorFilter.java:51) at coldfusion.filter.PathFilter.invoke(PathFilter.java:86) at coldfusion.filter.LicenseFilter.invoke(LicenseFilter.java:27) at coldfusion.filter.ExceptionFilter.invoke(ExceptionFilter.java:69) at coldfusion.filter.BrowserDebugFilter.invoke(BrowserDebugFilter.java:52) at coldfusion.filter.ClientScopePersistenceFilter.invoke(ClientScopePersistenceFilter.java:2 8) at coldfusion.filter.BrowserFilter.invoke(BrowserFilter.java:38) at coldfusion.filter.GlobalsFilter.invoke(GlobalsFilter.java:38) at coldfusion.filter.DatasourceFilter.invoke(DatasourceFilter.java:22) at coldfusion.filter.RequestThrottleFilter.invoke(RequestThrottleFilter.java:115) at coldfusion.CfmServlet.service(CfmServlet.java:107) at coldfusion.bootstrap.BootstrapServlet.service(BootstrapServlet.java:78) at jrun.servlet.ServletInvoker.invoke(ServletInvoker.java:91) at jrun.servlet.JRunInvokerChain.invokeNext(JRunInvokerChain.java:42) at jrun.servlet.JRunRequestDispatcher.invoke(JRunRequestDispatcher.java:257) at jrun.servlet.ServletEngineService.dispatch(ServletEngineService.java:541) at jrun.servlet.jrpp.JRunProxyService.invokeRunnable(JRunProxyService.java:204) at jrunx.scheduler.ThreadPool$DownstreamMetrics.invokeRunnable(ThreadPool.java:318) at jrunx.scheduler.ThreadPool$ThreadThrottle.invokeRunnable(ThreadPool.java:426) at jrunx.scheduler.ThreadPool$UpstreamMetrics.invokeRunnable(ThreadPool.java:264) at jrunx.scheduler.WorkerThread.run(WorkerThread.java:66)

So at last I figured this out myself and found a temporary resolution for this kind of problem. Majority of the times try creating the Collection through Cfcollection tag and then index it using cfindex tag, rather than performing these operations from the Cold Fusion 7 administrator.
The only reason I can think of which might have caused the issue is – I have thousands of documents in the collection which I indexed. So while indexing the page gets expired. So I tried again to index it. This time the collection got indexed fairly quickly and I got the response that the collection has been indexed successfully. So for the first time when I tried to index the collection, there might be some piece of code, which did not register the collection properly and hence giving this error.
When I did the same function using the code, with exactly same set of documents, it did not throw any error, even when I executed it for the first time. So the collection indexed properly.
I am not claiming that technically this theory is correct, but this seems to be the problem.
If someone knows technically what has happened at the back, please share it. For the time being, this is the fix – if you experience any problem in creating/indexing collections through cfadmin in CF7, do it thorough code.

Change Protected Attribute - E-recruiting default the sender E-mail Address

Hi Experts,
I am trying to modify the me->sender->emai_address with some default value at the staringof the method as an implicit enhancement in IF_HRRCF_CHANNEL_MAIL~SEND_DOCUMENT in CL_HRRCF_CS_DOC_CAT_SF_SUPER.
As SENDER is an Protected attribute it's not allowing me to change that value. Can you help me

This doesn't seem to be directly a Web Dynpro ABAP related question. You are asking about using the enhancment framework against a normal ABAP class. I understand that this class might be used within a surrounding WDA, but Web Dynpro doesn't appear to be a factor in anything about your question. I am moving it to ABAP General.

ACI-protected attributes exposed with attrs=ALL searches

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for