Actual costing: "not allocated" differences in second currency

Dear colleagues, we need your advise on the following issue.
We have Material Ledger (ML) and Currency & Valuation profile activated with two intra-currencies:
10 Company code currency
32 Group currency, profit center valuation
Both ML currencies are equal in exchange rates (1=1).
Actual costing run in ML is not working correctly for manufactured products, if raw materials were purchased for any extra-currency, e.g. USD or EUR. For example, three-level BOM:
1) for Raw materials (purchased for USD) consumption differences are equal in both ML currencies;
2) for Semi-finished product consumption differences are equal, but in second ML currency they are not included in upper-level consumption, and present as "not allocated";
3) as a result, costs are different in intra-currencies on the Finished product level.
Note 908776 - "Not included/not allocated and not distributed" - doesn't give explanation of this case.
Please, help!

HI,
Single Level Price Determination and Multiple Level Price Determination are steps that you will need to carry out as part of Month end close for Material Ledger. This is also appropriate for calculation of the product cost.
If you don't include multiple level price determination, the product cost for your part being manufactured in company code B in your example will be incorrect. However, if your concern is related to inclusion of multiple level price difference in revaluation of inventory, then you may need to introduce some custom code for reclassification purpose. You can refer to tables CKMLCR and MLCD for multiple level price differences and quantities.
Regards

Similar Messages

  • Difference between Actual Cost and Allocable costs in splitting KSS2

    I have Cost splitting structure results with me(KSS2)
    What is the difference between Actual Costs, Control Costs, Allocable Actual, Actual cost balance and which amount will system consider for calculating the rate with dividing the activity rates.

    Hi,
    In Splitting Structure KSS2 There are two Costs One is Target Cost (Planned) and Control Cost (Actual Cost)
    In Variance Calculation U will See Target Cost (Planned), Actual Cost, Allocated Actual Costs.
    Target Cost = Planned Cost
    Control Cost = Actual Cost
    Actual Cost = Actual Cost
    Allocated Actual Cost = Actual Cost of the Output Qty. This is Actual Credits from Activity allocation. This is Actual Credits from delivery of Stock.
    Hope you are Clear.

  • Target cost and actual cost not picking in production order

    Hello,
    The target cost and actual cost is not updating in production order when I display it in CO03 in cost analysis.
    Even though we have maintained planned price in KP26.
    Please suggest how it can be populated.
    Best Regards,
    Tapan

    Hi Tapan
    For Target cost
    1. Your std cost must be released before Goods Receipt
    2. There must be goods receipt posted on the prod order
    3. You must calculate variances in KKS1/2
    For Actual Cost
    1. Post Goods receipt and Goods issues
    2. See if any mat movements are pending in COGI
    3. Ensure that operation is confirmed in PP and no entry is lying in COFC
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Actual cost not updating in Pm order

    Hi Experts,
      We have a requirement from management for Having budget control based on department wise.
    For that we are trying out substitution rule by which Pm order is replaced with Internal order .we are having a budget profile and budget for internal order.Now we are able to control budget and system stopping if budget exceeded in migo transaction .We are replacing pm order with IO order with substitution with pm order number range. Issue is after having this setting actual cost is not updating in Pm order and pm report.
    Same is getting updated in mseg against pm order.
    With regards
    Anand.M

    Hi Anand
    Please add the budget profile at Plant maintenance order level no need to add any substitution rule
    budget should also be control at order level
    Thanks
    trinath 

  • Actual cost not correctly displayed for material consumed in an order

    Hi All,
    I have an issue which is as follows:
    In a service order, I have consumed 13 materials for which I am able to view the list of goods movement with its amount and plant and storage location.
    For each goods movement system has generated material document, accounting document, controlling document, etc.
    However system is not displaying the actual costs of all the 13 materials consumed within the order. Only one material cost is dispalyed in actual cost of overview tab of COSTS tab.
    Incidentally, when I clicked the "Rep. Plan/Act." button, system is displaying the actual costs of line item wise material consumption.
    Kindly let me know what could be the reason for this error.
    Many thanks in advance............ JK.

    Kannan,
    If the "Rep. Plan/Act." costs are correct, then you have problems with your value categories
    Have a look at the following correction programs:
    Run TCode OLI5 to correct value category errors (program RIPMCO00)
    Run TCode OLPM to re-build structures (program RIPMS001)
    PeteA

  • Actual cost not getting capture

    Hi Experts,
    We are using activities to capture cost upon activity confirmation for the labor cost.
    I have set up all required setting for activity types & rates and all.
    System capture plane cost without any issue.
    Actual cost also getting capture only if we put percentage of completion(Processing%) on activity & that is working fine.
    For the activities which are fully confirmed we just tick "Final Conf" & "completed " check box only, then system automatically updates Processing% as 100. In this case actual cost is not getting incurred although activity is full confirmed.
    Please help to overcome this conflict.
    Thanks in advance.
    Kind Regards,
    Sam L.

    Hi,
    Thanks a lot Ahmed for your assistence, I did it & it works as per my requirement.
    when I'm working on that I got to know that if the tick is on for the "propose activity" in confirmation parameters(OPST).
    But if switch on above feature(propose activity), I cant see the completed Processing% since it always shows as 100.
    So other than this, is there any way to stop capculating work forcast by default for all activities?
    kind Regards,
    Sam L.

  • Actual Cost not updating to Network Activity from CATS

    Dear All,
    Am back here for the expert suggestions / guidance.
    I am facing issue with respect to system not updating the actual cost in network activity / projects posted through time sheet i.e. CATS. I have planned my resource cost through work centre assigned with activity type, formula and cost centre. I have kept the employee master data in place with maintaining the 315 infotype. In CAT2 i am posting the respective time sheet on the particular network activity and am transferring the cost into projects by CAT5, the plan cost is getting updated but actuals are not hitting the projects.
    Kindly do the needful and suggest me if am missing something out of the track
    Thanks
    Praveen Mohanachary

    HI Gokul,
    There wasn't any error during confirmation and i have also checked in CN30 as well as COFC transaction. It is posting the time and the activity is getting the PCNF status set but there isn't any actuals posted. I used CATA for some activity and also used CAT5 for certain activity both are not posting actuals on projects.
    Thanks
    Praveen B M

  • How to see cost componentwise production order actual cost-not planned cost

    Hi,
    Can anybody tell me how to see cost componentwise production order actual cost ?
    Thanks,
    Bijay

    Hi,
    CO03->Goto-> costs-> Anlysis
    or use the std. report KKBC_ORD
    std. reoprt MCRI
    KVBI - Actual Costs
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Actual cost  is not  seen in the  variance calculation KKS2

    Hi
    I   did  variance calculation of  a Production order  ( after  telco)  .  Its a co - product.   The  target cost , actual cost and  allocated cost   fields are present  after  execution.   Now  the  actual cost  field is   blank  and  so   the  variance is not  correct.
    Pl  advise on  why  the  actual cost field is not  populated with  the cost.
    Thanks
    kamala

    Hi
    KOB1  shows the actual cost .  I do  TECO  for the PO and  calculate  Variance for co-product material,  and  the  actual cost is showing at  zero.  But   then i  do  settlement  KO88,  and  the   variance amount  gets posted CORRECTLY and FI document is generated.
    So  why is the  ACTUAL COST  field   ' ZERO'    in  KKS2,  but    KO88   settlement  shows the  variance amount.
    It  there some different logic  to  do variance calculation  for   PO   involving  main product  which have  co-products  in it.
    Thanks for  any inputs
    kamala

  • KKS5 allocated actual cost

    Hi,
    In KKS5 Varience report, system is showing Target Cost, Actual cost and Allocated actual cost. Target cost and actual cost is storing in table COSS. But i want to know which table allocated actual cost will be stored. Can any one guide me on this.
    govind.

    Hi
    1. Allocated costs are always treated as Fixed costs, unless you have booked the expenses in FI using Activity Type as Aux Account assignment object
    2. Check whether these costs are included in Inventory valuation in your Cost Comp Str in OKTZ... If not relevant for inv valuation, these costs wont show up for Variance calculations
    br, Ajay M

  • Actual Costing/Material Ledger (CO-PC-ACT) - Actual costing

    Hello,
    I have same problem with actual costing in material Ledger.
    When I perform the actual costing a price differences that belongs to materials (orders) which at the end of the period are WIP, remain not split and don not book them on Accruals and defer.acct(material ledger) (OBYC - Transaction LKW).
    Moreover,  in the following month, system does not taking into account the value.
    Does anybody had similar problem or  knew how tu handle it?
    Thanks in advance,
    Rafal

    Hi Rafal,
    there is a functionality built into acual costing to cover this:
    [WIP Revaluation  |http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/9e/9e7a74681f1d4f9ba6f5d64aba4a44/frameset.htm]
    best regards,
                   Udo

  • Excise duty value on sales invoice not reflecting in the actual cost

    Hi,
    we are paying excise duty, when we are removing material from plant for the particular project. Now excise duty paid is reflecting properly in the actual cost colunn of the the report s_alr_87013558. Secondly when we are rasing commercial invoice to the customer & excise duty paid earlier is recovered from the customer, now excise duty recovered from the customer is not being reduced from the actual cost.
    Cost elment for excise duty paid - 6101100, with category 1 - primary cos/ cost reducing revenue.
    Cost elment for excise duty recovered -  3801090, with category 11 -  Revenue.
    Kindly guide how to update(reduced) excise duty revocvered in the acutal cost.
    regards
    Sanjay

    Hi Mohan,
    Please use the formatting options to format ur question...!!
    Thanks,
    Tatvagna.

  • Secondary cost element actual data not posted

    Hi Gurus,
    Actually we are posting the actual cost elements data into particular cost cenetr through batch job.upto 12/31/2009 the actual data is showing for the particular secondary cost element(overheads).Only after 01/01/2010 the actual data is not posted for this particular cost element inthat particular cost center.For the remining cost elements into that particular cost cnetr the actual data is posted thru batch job.We checked that particularsecondary cost element,the validity period is upto 31/12/9999.Suggest on this one.
    Thanks in advance
    Jana

    Hi,
    Did you execute overhead allocation processes as from 01/01?
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Actual Costing - CKME update in group and local currency - split

    Hi Experts,
    We are using Actual Costing and running CKMLCP and CKME to update our standard price, in local currency and in group currency.
    The result it is one PR accounting document, with group currency and local currency booked in it.
    Now, we have this requeriment where they want to have 1 PR document with local currency booked and $0 group currency and another PR document with local currency as $0 and Group Currency booked.
    It is like doing MR21 and not doing automatic translation into foreign currency, that is what we want.
    So, the question is, Is there a way of archiving this in a simple way?
    Thanks for your comments!
    Enrique

    Hi Enrique,
    The final step in CKMLCP enters future prices for all materials based on the actual prices of the period.
    You could Use CKMPRPN the 'maintenance of future prices' with it's rule based approach to change the data before activating with CKME.
    You could
    1. delete the group currency future prices (CKMPRPN)
    2. release the new standard prices in company code currency (CKME)
    3. create future prices in group currency by adopting the (previous month's) V-price as future price (CKMPRPN)
    4. release the new standard prices in group code currency (CKME)
    I am not sure if you could  also distinguish the validity dates between both currencies with CKMPRPN. If yes, that might be better than deleting and rebuilding the price.You could change the date for one currency into the future, use CKME, change the date back and use CKME again.
    A disadvantage of the procedure would be that you will not release the cost component split from CKMLCP. In step 4 only the new price will be released and the split will be created from the former split. In step 2 the original split from CKMLCP will be activated.
    best regards,
                 Udo

  • Clearing F-03 is not happening due to difference in Group Currency

    I am doing a mannual clearing f-03 for cenvat clearing account. All SPRO settings including OB09 are maintained and working fine; but when I try to post the doument it show that there is a small difference in Group Currecny figures. When I simulate the transaction in Group Currency figure, there is very very small difference against the  Exchange Fluctu.Accounts figure.
    System is not automatically calculating this Group Currency figures (foreign) correctly due to which difference get arise.
    Even though in Local currency (INR) figures are matching I am not able to post the clearing document.
    Is there any way out ? Whether any SAP Note I have to apply to resolve the issue. (Presently on ECC 6 EHP 3)
    If require I can send the screen shot too.
    Regards
    Sandeep

    If your OB09 settings are appropriate, the clearing difference in group currency should automatically go to the gain/loss account you have defined in OB09.  Can you copy/paste the OB09 settings here?  Do you have an account specified for the realized gain/loss in OB09 or just for unrealized gain/loss?  That could be one reason.
    Another thing that you may want to check is if the realized gain/loss account is created as a cost element.  If yes, you need a cost object (cost center, most likely) for this realized gain/loss account (in OKB9).

Maybe you are looking for

  • Lock-ups/freezes - Nvidia GeForce 8600M GT

    Hi all, I have been the owner of a MacBook Pro since August or so. My problem is that when working with my MacBook Pro, occasionally the display freezes up. Sometimes it recovers, sometimes the machine refuse to recover. If I listen to iTunes, I hear

  • Registering iPod for the first time

    I bought a new iPod Touch but I can't get it to let me register it through Apple when I plug it into my computer. I've already done it once 2 yrs ago with my sons but When I plug mine in it is not prompting me to register mine. Also having problems g

  • Motion 4.0.0 quits when I try to save or export?

    I am running with Processor:  3.06 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo,  Memory: 4 GB 1067 MHz DDR3, Final Cut Studio 2.  1TB Harddrive. (Only 263GB left) So recently I upgraded to 10.6.7  and now I've noticed that when I open up Motion 4.0.0  I can create a new pr

  • MuVo² Buttons Problem - Completely Block

    Hello all,i have a major problem...and i wish to know if i can solve it without going to any service centre.Here's the problem: Some days ago, my player went batt empty,so I charged it,and when I pushed play button to start it, it all went ok, it loa

  • MySQL connectivity Problem URGENT plz

    Hi plz can any one help me... its urgent i need java to connect to MySQL database.with mm.mysql.Driver the following sample code is just copied from the site and made changes in hostname, dbname and username. classpath has been given correctly for th