Actual SKF (KB31N)  vs Plan SKF (KP46)

Hi,
Currently we are using tc: KP46 planning SKF and  in our assessment and distribution cycles  also we are using '6.Plan stat.key figures' in receiver tracing factor.
If I want to discontinue using KP46 and use KB31N, do I need to change the receiving tracing factor in all the cycles to '4.actual stat.key figures', any implications.
I want to know what is the purpose of tc KB31N -Actual SKF?
Thanks
Suresh.

difference between actual SKF (KB31N) and Plan (KP46) is that Actual SKF posts the actual values on paticular recievers and planning through KP46 is done just to get the variance reports.In beginning of year or period planning is done because Actual/Plan version reports are possible only if both actual and plan data is available in the system.
thanks
deepa

Similar Messages

  • I need to know the difference between planned SKF and Actual SKF from business view and when I can use one of them ?

    I need just to know the difference between plan SKF and Actual SKF in business example and when I use one of them.
    thanks

    Hi Salaam,
    Statistical Key Figure (SKF) is a base to allocate the cost between cost centers. Usually, common cost centers cost should allocate to respective department cost centers on monthly basis.
    Some of SKFs are: Calculating floor rent on SFT, Telephone charges on No. of units, and employees head count is with "Each" in SAP.
    Apart from Ajay's reply, you can consider the Canteen exp in an organization. Assume Admin, Fin and Mfg departments are getting food services from Canteen. Here, total monthly cost of Canteen exp should be allocated to respective departments. Here, we use SKF as total head count of each department and distribute the cost.
    Planned SKF is what you planned on the beginning of a period. (Assume head count was planned as 30 in the month beginning)
    Actual SKF is what exactly you consumed over the period. (Actual employees provided canteen services during the month is 25)
    BR, Srinivas Salpala

  • BAPI for Posting Actual SKF

    Hi ,
    Is there a BAPI in existence for Posting Actual SKF in CO ! Please let me know.
    Regards,
    Venkat.

    Hello,
    you have a BAdi for posting SKF (you need to implement EXT_CO_ACTUAL_DATA).
    Good luck.

  • How to change actual effort in project plan when Projected Actual option is enable in Project Server 2010

    Hi,
    We have enable "Protect User Updates" option from PWA->Task Setting and Display->Only allow task updates via Task and Timesheets, to protect actual efforts in project plan that PM changes manually, however in some cases we need to allow actual
    effort changes in open projects so it there any way or workaround so that Administrator or PM can make changes in actual even though "Protect User Updates" option is enable. Please Help!!
    Thanks,
    Rahul

    Hi Rahul,
    Indeed when this option is activated, there is no way to directly update actual work in the project plan.
    The workaround is to temporary deactivate this option, more preferly not during office working hours to avoid unexpected project updates.
    A better workaround would be to ask the resource to recall, correct and submit again the timesheet, so the PM can approve an updated actual work. Finally the PM can use delegation to rscall and correct the timesheet for the resource.
    Hope this helps.
    Guillaume Rouyre - MBA, MCP, MCTS

  • What is the actual cost of these plans?

    What is the actual cost of these plans?
    * $59.99 a month for 450 minutes
    * $79.99 a month for 900 minutes
    * $99.99 a month for 1,350 minutes
    Although they will very, Answers welcome from anyone in the USA. So I can have and idea of the cost with taxes and fees. I am located in both LA and NYC. I currently have a NYC number with Verizion using the 450 minutes plan. The plan cost $39.99 before taxes and fees and $48.42 after taxes and fees.
    Breakdown of Monthly Access Charges:
    450 minute plan: $39.99
    Verizon Wireless' Surcharges and Other Charges & Credits: $3.31
    Taxes, Governmental Surcharges & Fees: $5.12
    Total Current Charges: *$48.42*

    My plan total is $84.99/month, then with taxes and fees it comes to $93.40 each month as the total bill. The biggest fee is the state sales tax, at just over $5 on my last bill. Then the 911 fees, fed regulatory fees, and all that are a few bucks each.
    My plan -
    450 Minute (required) $39.99
    Unlimited Data (required) $30
    1500 Text msgs (optional) $15
    Total = $84.99

  • Not getting 'actual data' in the planning query

    Hi all,
    I am debug other's query. This cube stores 'actual' and 'plan' data and I loaded 'actual' and can see it in the cube. But I cannot see 'actual data' when I run the planning query.
    I checked all restrictions in the KFs and CHARs and fliters in the query. There are only 'value type 10', 'fiscal year variant Z1', and 'currency CAD' restricted and actual data does contain those values in all line items.
    Can someone point it out what it could be the issue? Thank you.
    R.

    Hi,
    if you enter some data (plan data) you cannot see it again. Is that correct?
    are you using the same query to enter and to see plan data?
    Because if you are entering data in an aggregate level and you are executing your query over the infocube you will not see the data from the yellow request. If you execute query over the aggregate you should be able to see all data in the cube (yellow and green requests).
    Also check if your query is defined as per note 1136163.
    I hope this helps.
    Lucimar

  • How Distinguish planning data and Actual data in a Planning cube

    Hi,
    I want to dispaly planning data & actaul data in a query how can i do it?
    in my query it is showing all the requests it is not distinguishing.

    Well use infoobject 0VTYPE for actual and plan differentiation
    and 0VERSION to categorise which version of Plan data it is,typically you might have different planning versions .
    Example
    0VTYPE = 10 actual
    0VTYPE = 20  plan
    0VERSION = 001
    0VERSION = 002
    0VERSION = 003
    Business decides which 0version value to be taken as final planning version once freezed.0VTYPE = 10 for actuals is always one ,it do not have 0VERSION to be taken in to account.
    Hope it Helps
    Chetan
    @CP..

  • Actual sales figures against planned figures

    Hello,
    I had a question regarding SOP. Can we have actual sales figures to appear against planned value in the information structure?. If so how do we accommodate it?
    THis is so that the planner can see for the past year what has been the planned sales and what has been the actual sales.
    Sincerely
    Aji

    Hi Aji
    The actual sales figure can be appeared in planning type (MC8B) . Place the cursor on the sales key figue and goto Edit-.Actual data prev year (Ctrl+F1)
    Regards

  • Actual Activity allocation and Planned and actual activity comparison issue in Product Costing

    Friends,
    I have tried to explain the issue i am facing currently under Product Costing......
    1.Cost Component Structure
    10 – Material
    20 – Labour
    30 – Diesel
    40 – Electricity
    2.KP26 – Planned under Fixed Price
    Labour – 2.0 HR
    Diesel – 1.0 HR
    Electricity – 5.0 HR
    3. When I run CK11N system collecting correct rates for all activities (Costing Lot Size- 1)
    Like;
    1              E              LAB10    994310                  2.00        2.00        AED        1.0          HR Labour Cost New
    2              E              DIE20    994320                  5.00        5.00        AED        1.0          HR Diesel Cost New
    3              E              ELE30    994330                  1.00        1.00        AED        1.0          HR Electricity Cost
    4              M            1100000042                          5.00        0.00        AED        1              PC RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
    5              G            994201                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Depriciation Cost
    6              G            994202                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Sales & Distribution Cost
                                                                              13.00                    AED       
    4.When I do process order Cost analysis for the produced goods it shows me different figures as my
    BOM – RM is 1100000042 1 Quantity
    Routing – All activity time is 1 Hr
    40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
    40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            13.00-
    994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      1.33
    994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      3.33
    994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      0.67
                                                                                                                                              2.67- AED
    Note :- As per my understanding it should be
        Labour Cost New                                            2.00
                    Diesel Cost New                                              5.00
                    Electricity Cost                                                1.00
    5.Now after Process Order confirmation
    40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
    40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            00.00
    994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      4.00
    994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      5.00
    994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      2.00
                                                                                                                                              16.00
    6.For Month end actual Activity calculation and load the activaty actual rates on product
    I have configured the system in below manner
    1 Work center = Mapped to 1 Production Cost center
    Three Different Activities mapped to Secondary Cost Element with 43 Category
    For Electrictity Activity assesment from Primary to secondary 1 more cost element created with
          Category 42 Like; 994215-Electricity Cost All
    One Actual Assessment has been configured to allocate Electricity cost from Primary Cost element to
          Product/Order
    7.Assessment Cycle Details
    Controlling Area      1000 Controlling Area
    Cycle                ZELE01                  Status    Reviewed
    Start Date 01.01.2014  To  31.10.2014
    Text                  Elec. Cost Allocation to PROD
    IND- Interactive
    Assessment CEle       994215      Electricity Cost All
    Sender
    Cost Center    CBAKYDXBAD
    Cost Element 40204
    Receiver
    Cost Center    CBAKYPDDXB
    Tracing Factor
    Var.portion type – Actual Activity
    Selaction Criteria
    Activity Type - ELE30
    Receivers Tracing Factor
    Cost Ctr Factor per        100
    CBAKYPDDXB 100
    8.I have received the actuall electricity bill for 1100 AED and the same has accocated through KSU5
    After Cycle run when I follow below procedure
    KSS2 Actual cost splitting
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB01                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE02                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE03                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE20                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE30                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB10                    183.35
                                                                                                                    1100.00
    Issue – System Split Electricity cost between all the activities assigned to Workcentres Cost Centre.
    But I want to post that cost only to ELE30 Activity and not for all
    When I RUN KSSI for actual Price determination system shows
    OTy        Object                                  Name                  AUn                Act Qty      Total price    Price (Fixed)              PUnit
    ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20        Production Dxb      HR                  5.0          366.66                  366.66                    10
    ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.65                  916.65                    10
    ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.75                916.75                    10
                                                                                                                                                          2200.06
    2200.06 is almost double than 1100.00 which is actual electricity cost and the same is actually determined for all the activities.
    After revaluation of the process order system posting below values
    40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042                            5.00        5.00
    40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071                            13.00-    13.00-
    994310                  Labour Cost New                                            CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10                      1.33        183.35
    994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20                      3.33        183.33
    994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30                      0.67        183.33
                                                                                                                                                              2.67-      542.01
    Production Variance is posted as 542.01….
    I strongly believe there is some issue in configuration for activity allocation….
    Main issue is
    Point No. 4 – Different Figures in Process Order Cost Analysis
    Point No. 7 – Assessment cycle run
    Point No. 8 – KSS2 and KSII for Actual cost Allocation and Production variance…
    Friends… I have tried to explain maximum please help me to understand the concept or missing configuration/Process.
    Thanks
    Sagar Chinchkar

    Dear Rajneesh,
    I have made the changes as suggested....
    It seems now my Order Cost analysis and Product cost analysis are showing the same figures.
    I have also maintained cost center splitting structure for ELE30 Activity allocation.
    Structure Z1
    Splitting structure for AT
    Assignment 10
    Electricity Cost
    100
    Allocation for ELE
    Cost Element
    994215
    Activity Type
    ELE30
    Splitting Rule
    100
    Allocation for ELE
    12
    Activity quantity
    Version 0
    In my case actual activity confirmed is 3.1 for 2 orders in period 5
    Order 1 - QTY 2
    Order 2 - QTY 1.1
    Total actual Electricity exp is 1150 in period 5
    followed procedure to post actual activity on product is mentioned below
    KSS2 Actual cost splitting - Result as expected 1150 for ELE30
    KSII Actual price determination - Result as expected 3.1 actual confirmed QTY for ELE30 with actual price
           QTY 3.1         Tot Price 3,709.68        Planned(FIX) 3,709.68     Per Units 10
           (System is doing 1150/3.1*10=3709.68)
        3.CON2 Actual revaluation of orders
          Here while reevaluating the Process Orders system calculation is different
    Order 1 - QTY 2 -   558.00
    Order 2 - QTY 1.1 - 407.56
    Total -                    965.57
         4. After CON2 system is changing the value of other activities like
         LAB10 - Actual confirmed Value 10  to 0 
         DIE20 - Actual  confirmed Value 10  to 0
    Which should not be the case....
                                                                                                                  PL     Act     Var
    40002
    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
    1005/1100000042
    10.00
    15.00
    50.00
    40015
    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
    1005/4400000074
    26.00-
    26.00-
    994201
    Depriciation Cost
    WMBDDEP01
    1.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994202
    Sales & Distribution Cost
    WMBDS&A01
    1.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994310
    Labour Cost New
    CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10
    4.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994320
    Diesel Cost New
    CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20
    10.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994330
    Electricity Cost
    CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30
    2.00
    408.06
    20,303.00
    If we want to just post Electricity cost based on actual Electricity expenses and Labor and Diesel are based on planned activity rates.
    What setting is required in current system.....
    Million thanks in advance....
    Regards
    Sagar Chinchkar

  • Actual work less than planned work

    Projects 2010
    If actual work is less than planned work the column remaining work is filled with difference between planning and actual. The actual work do complete the job (=100%). If % is put to 100 after actual work is filled and remaining work is
    set to 0 the planned work is changed to actual work. I like to maintain the originally scheduled work. How I achieve that.
    example: planned work   5.0 hrs
                   actual work     3.5 hrs
                   complete        100 %
                  remaining work 0.0 hrs
    This will enable to improve the planning

    Hi Rene,
    This is not possible. The work (planned work) will be equal to the acutal work.
    What you can do is to use bsaeline: just baseline your project plan in order to keep the original scheduled work.
    You'll have something like:
    Baseline work: 5hrs
    Work: 3.5hrs
    Actual work: 3.5hrs
    Remaining work: 0 hrs
    % complete: 100%
    Hope this helps,
    Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MVP, MCP |

  • When actual work goes over planned work

    Is there a way to show that is a task is over 100% for work complete?
    Here is the situation.
    Planned work is 80 hrs and actual work is 93 hours but project shows work complete to 100% but the task is not finished yet.
    Can I show over 100%?

    % complete is (Actual Duration/Duration) * 100
    % Work Complete is (Actual work/work) * 100
    As Guillaume notes, if the Actual work exceeds the original work estimate, Project will assume the task is complete.  You can add the Remaining Work field to a task view but if you have multiple resources assigned you may wish to add the field to the
    Task Usage view to capture Actual and Remaining Work on an assignment by assignment basis.
    If you have saved a baseline before tracking - Project will calculate Work Variance for you -- the difference between baseline Work (your plan) and Work.

  • Issue in Quantity " Actual" Quantity of a Planned Service - In serviceentry

    Dear All,
    I am have one issue client created the PO for service  for 700  EA Qty price is 10 so Total =7000.00
    Then he already made service entry for  300 qty . now in PO open Qty is 400.
    now he is trying to make service entry for pending Qty 400 but system is giveing error if  we enter 399 then system is accepting that one qty variation is comming.can you please tell me what i have to check
    Note :I checked the service entry sheet in the qty field he entered 300 but  in the actual qty 301 is showing how it is picked ???
    Regards
    Murugan

    Hi Rakesh,
    But he one service entry sheet then he for one Qty . but i checked in the materail doc ithink it is reversed.
    Thanks i checked the same he did 300 qty only. for one service entry sheet.
    yes I checked as per your advice it is showing Entered Qty is  301  and the accepted qty is 300
    That one qty service entry sheet is showing     No acceptanc. what i have to do can please tell me...
    I have to reverese the Service entry sheet.??
    Regards
    Murugan

  • AT / SKF report on ksu1 or ksv1 cycle

    Hi,
    In KSU1 or KSV1, we can define var portion type by actual SKF or AT or on plan cycle also.
    May I know if there is a report to show the var portion type of distribution or assessment cycle is using AT or SKF?
    It is quite difficult to locate the var portion type whether the cycle is using which method.
    Thanks

    Hi
    There are no Standard Reports for that as far as I know.
    Either you have to write the Query from Tables or You have to buildup a Z Program for it

  • SKF transactional values based on company code

    Can anybody let me know the logic how we can seggregate transactional value passed to statistical key figure based on company code or is there anytable where we can direclty find SKF transactions involved based on company code ?
    Need to upload SKF transactional figures from one SAP system to another.Hence require process for extraction and uploading of the same

    Hi Amogh
    Hope you are looking for actual SKF quantities posted. kindly check s_alr_87013611 CC report, I think on the lower part this comes. This time I am not in front of system so you please check.
    Regards
    Rajneesh

  • Project System Costs: budget/actual/commt/rem.plan/assd

    Hi all,
    I'm trying to obtain the following information from PS report "s_alr_87013558" :
    budget (I actually have it from table RPSCO1)
    actual
    commitment
    remaining order plan costs
    assigned
    I've tried very hard to get this info from the logical database PSJ but I can't find it. I really need help on this, so I'll appreciate your comments.  Regards!!

    Hi,
    look table rpsco: field wrttp
    wrttp           description
    41              budget
    11              (Statistical)actual
    22              Purchase Order Commitment
    disposable = 41 -11 - 22.
    regards Andreas

Maybe you are looking for