Actual SKF (KB31N) vs Plan SKF (KP46)
Hi,
Currently we are using tc: KP46 planning SKF and in our assessment and distribution cycles also we are using '6.Plan stat.key figures' in receiver tracing factor.
If I want to discontinue using KP46 and use KB31N, do I need to change the receiving tracing factor in all the cycles to '4.actual stat.key figures', any implications.
I want to know what is the purpose of tc KB31N -Actual SKF?
Thanks
Suresh.
difference between actual SKF (KB31N) and Plan (KP46) is that Actual SKF posts the actual values on paticular recievers and planning through KP46 is done just to get the variance reports.In beginning of year or period planning is done because Actual/Plan version reports are possible only if both actual and plan data is available in the system.
thanks
deepa
Similar Messages
-
I need just to know the difference between plan SKF and Actual SKF in business example and when I use one of them.
thanksHi Salaam,
Statistical Key Figure (SKF) is a base to allocate the cost between cost centers. Usually, common cost centers cost should allocate to respective department cost centers on monthly basis.
Some of SKFs are: Calculating floor rent on SFT, Telephone charges on No. of units, and employees head count is with "Each" in SAP.
Apart from Ajay's reply, you can consider the Canteen exp in an organization. Assume Admin, Fin and Mfg departments are getting food services from Canteen. Here, total monthly cost of Canteen exp should be allocated to respective departments. Here, we use SKF as total head count of each department and distribute the cost.
Planned SKF is what you planned on the beginning of a period. (Assume head count was planned as 30 in the month beginning)
Actual SKF is what exactly you consumed over the period. (Actual employees provided canteen services during the month is 25)
BR, Srinivas Salpala -
Hi ,
Is there a BAPI in existence for Posting Actual SKF in CO ! Please let me know.
Regards,
Venkat.Hello,
you have a BAdi for posting SKF (you need to implement EXT_CO_ACTUAL_DATA).
Good luck. -
Hi,
We have enable "Protect User Updates" option from PWA->Task Setting and Display->Only allow task updates via Task and Timesheets, to protect actual efforts in project plan that PM changes manually, however in some cases we need to allow actual
effort changes in open projects so it there any way or workaround so that Administrator or PM can make changes in actual even though "Protect User Updates" option is enable. Please Help!!
Thanks,
RahulHi Rahul,
Indeed when this option is activated, there is no way to directly update actual work in the project plan.
The workaround is to temporary deactivate this option, more preferly not during office working hours to avoid unexpected project updates.
A better workaround would be to ask the resource to recall, correct and submit again the timesheet, so the PM can approve an updated actual work. Finally the PM can use delegation to rscall and correct the timesheet for the resource.
Hope this helps.
Guillaume Rouyre - MBA, MCP, MCTS -
What is the actual cost of these plans?
What is the actual cost of these plans?
* $59.99 a month for 450 minutes
* $79.99 a month for 900 minutes
* $99.99 a month for 1,350 minutes
Although they will very, Answers welcome from anyone in the USA. So I can have and idea of the cost with taxes and fees. I am located in both LA and NYC. I currently have a NYC number with Verizion using the 450 minutes plan. The plan cost $39.99 before taxes and fees and $48.42 after taxes and fees.
Breakdown of Monthly Access Charges:
450 minute plan: $39.99
Verizon Wireless' Surcharges and Other Charges & Credits: $3.31
Taxes, Governmental Surcharges & Fees: $5.12
Total Current Charges: *$48.42*My plan total is $84.99/month, then with taxes and fees it comes to $93.40 each month as the total bill. The biggest fee is the state sales tax, at just over $5 on my last bill. Then the 911 fees, fed regulatory fees, and all that are a few bucks each.
My plan -
450 Minute (required) $39.99
Unlimited Data (required) $30
1500 Text msgs (optional) $15
Total = $84.99 -
Not getting 'actual data' in the planning query
Hi all,
I am debug other's query. This cube stores 'actual' and 'plan' data and I loaded 'actual' and can see it in the cube. But I cannot see 'actual data' when I run the planning query.
I checked all restrictions in the KFs and CHARs and fliters in the query. There are only 'value type 10', 'fiscal year variant Z1', and 'currency CAD' restricted and actual data does contain those values in all line items.
Can someone point it out what it could be the issue? Thank you.
R.Hi,
if you enter some data (plan data) you cannot see it again. Is that correct?
are you using the same query to enter and to see plan data?
Because if you are entering data in an aggregate level and you are executing your query over the infocube you will not see the data from the yellow request. If you execute query over the aggregate you should be able to see all data in the cube (yellow and green requests).
Also check if your query is defined as per note 1136163.
I hope this helps.
Lucimar -
How Distinguish planning data and Actual data in a Planning cube
Hi,
I want to dispaly planning data & actaul data in a query how can i do it?
in my query it is showing all the requests it is not distinguishing.Well use infoobject 0VTYPE for actual and plan differentiation
and 0VERSION to categorise which version of Plan data it is,typically you might have different planning versions .
Example
0VTYPE = 10 actual
0VTYPE = 20 plan
0VERSION = 001
0VERSION = 002
0VERSION = 003
Business decides which 0version value to be taken as final planning version once freezed.0VTYPE = 10 for actuals is always one ,it do not have 0VERSION to be taken in to account.
Hope it Helps
Chetan
@CP.. -
Actual sales figures against planned figures
Hello,
I had a question regarding SOP. Can we have actual sales figures to appear against planned value in the information structure?. If so how do we accommodate it?
THis is so that the planner can see for the past year what has been the planned sales and what has been the actual sales.
Sincerely
AjiHi Aji
The actual sales figure can be appeared in planning type (MC8B) . Place the cursor on the sales key figue and goto Edit-.Actual data prev year (Ctrl+F1)
Regards -
Actual Activity allocation and Planned and actual activity comparison issue in Product Costing
Friends,
I have tried to explain the issue i am facing currently under Product Costing......
1.Cost Component Structure
10 – Material
20 – Labour
30 – Diesel
40 – Electricity
2.KP26 – Planned under Fixed Price
Labour – 2.0 HR
Diesel – 1.0 HR
Electricity – 5.0 HR
3. When I run CK11N system collecting correct rates for all activities (Costing Lot Size- 1)
Like;
1 E LAB10 994310 2.00 2.00 AED 1.0 HR Labour Cost New
2 E DIE20 994320 5.00 5.00 AED 1.0 HR Diesel Cost New
3 E ELE30 994330 1.00 1.00 AED 1.0 HR Electricity Cost
4 M 1100000042 5.00 0.00 AED 1 PC RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
5 G 994201 0.00 0.00 AED Depriciation Cost
6 G 994202 0.00 0.00 AED Sales & Distribution Cost
13.00 AED
4.When I do process order Cost analysis for the produced goods it shows me different figures as my
BOM – RM is 1100000042 1 Quantity
Routing – All activity time is 1 Hr
40002 RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED 1005/1100000042 5.00
40015 COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED 1005/4400000071 13.00-
994310 Labour Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 1.33
994320 Diesel Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 3.33
994330 Electricity Cost CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 0.67
2.67- AED
Note :- As per my understanding it should be
Labour Cost New 2.00
Diesel Cost New 5.00
Electricity Cost 1.00
5.Now after Process Order confirmation
40002 RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED 1005/1100000042 5.00
40015 COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED 1005/4400000071 00.00
994310 Labour Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 4.00
994320 Diesel Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 5.00
994330 Electricity Cost CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 2.00
16.00
6.For Month end actual Activity calculation and load the activaty actual rates on product
I have configured the system in below manner
1 Work center = Mapped to 1 Production Cost center
Three Different Activities mapped to Secondary Cost Element with 43 Category
For Electrictity Activity assesment from Primary to secondary 1 more cost element created with
Category 42 Like; 994215-Electricity Cost All
One Actual Assessment has been configured to allocate Electricity cost from Primary Cost element to
Product/Order
7.Assessment Cycle Details
Controlling Area 1000 Controlling Area
Cycle ZELE01 Status Reviewed
Start Date 01.01.2014 To 31.10.2014
Text Elec. Cost Allocation to PROD
IND- Interactive
Assessment CEle 994215 Electricity Cost All
Sender
Cost Center CBAKYDXBAD
Cost Element 40204
Receiver
Cost Center CBAKYPDDXB
Tracing Factor
Var.portion type – Actual Activity
Selaction Criteria
Activity Type - ELE30
Receivers Tracing Factor
Cost Ctr Factor per 100
CBAKYPDDXB 100
8.I have received the actuall electricity bill for 1100 AED and the same has accocated through KSU5
After Cycle run when I follow below procedure
KSS2 Actual cost splitting
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb LAB01 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb DIE02 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb ELE03 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb DIE20 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb ELE30 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb LAB10 183.35
1100.00
Issue – System Split Electricity cost between all the activities assigned to Workcentres Cost Centre.
But I want to post that cost only to ELE30 Activity and not for all
When I RUN KSSI for actual Price determination system shows
OTy Object Name AUn Act Qty Total price Price (Fixed) PUnit
ATY CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 Production Dxb HR 5.0 366.66 366.66 10
ATY CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 Production Dxb HR 2.0 916.65 916.65 10
ATY CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 Production Dxb HR 2.0 916.75 916.75 10
2200.06
2200.06 is almost double than 1100.00 which is actual electricity cost and the same is actually determined for all the activities.
After revaluation of the process order system posting below values
40002 RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED 1005/1100000042 5.00 5.00
40015 COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED 1005/4400000071 13.00- 13.00-
994310 Labour Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 1.33 183.35
994320 Diesel Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 3.33 183.33
994330 Electricity Cost CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 0.67 183.33
2.67- 542.01
Production Variance is posted as 542.01….
I strongly believe there is some issue in configuration for activity allocation….
Main issue is
Point No. 4 – Different Figures in Process Order Cost Analysis
Point No. 7 – Assessment cycle run
Point No. 8 – KSS2 and KSII for Actual cost Allocation and Production variance…
Friends… I have tried to explain maximum please help me to understand the concept or missing configuration/Process.
Thanks
Sagar ChinchkarDear Rajneesh,
I have made the changes as suggested....
It seems now my Order Cost analysis and Product cost analysis are showing the same figures.
I have also maintained cost center splitting structure for ELE30 Activity allocation.
Structure Z1
Splitting structure for AT
Assignment 10
Electricity Cost
100
Allocation for ELE
Cost Element
994215
Activity Type
ELE30
Splitting Rule
100
Allocation for ELE
12
Activity quantity
Version 0
In my case actual activity confirmed is 3.1 for 2 orders in period 5
Order 1 - QTY 2
Order 2 - QTY 1.1
Total actual Electricity exp is 1150 in period 5
followed procedure to post actual activity on product is mentioned below
KSS2 Actual cost splitting - Result as expected 1150 for ELE30
KSII Actual price determination - Result as expected 3.1 actual confirmed QTY for ELE30 with actual price
QTY 3.1 Tot Price 3,709.68 Planned(FIX) 3,709.68 Per Units 10
(System is doing 1150/3.1*10=3709.68)
3.CON2 Actual revaluation of orders
Here while reevaluating the Process Orders system calculation is different
Order 1 - QTY 2 - 558.00
Order 2 - QTY 1.1 - 407.56
Total - 965.57
4. After CON2 system is changing the value of other activities like
LAB10 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
DIE20 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
Which should not be the case....
PL Act Var
40002
RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
1005/1100000042
10.00
15.00
50.00
40015
COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
1005/4400000074
26.00-
26.00-
994201
Depriciation Cost
WMBDDEP01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994202
Sales & Distribution Cost
WMBDS&A01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994310
Labour Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10
4.00
0.00
100.00-
994320
Diesel Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20
10.00
0.00
100.00-
994330
Electricity Cost
CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30
2.00
408.06
20,303.00
If we want to just post Electricity cost based on actual Electricity expenses and Labor and Diesel are based on planned activity rates.
What setting is required in current system.....
Million thanks in advance....
Regards
Sagar Chinchkar -
Actual work less than planned work
Projects 2010
If actual work is less than planned work the column remaining work is filled with difference between planning and actual. The actual work do complete the job (=100%). If % is put to 100 after actual work is filled and remaining work is
set to 0 the planned work is changed to actual work. I like to maintain the originally scheduled work. How I achieve that.
example: planned work 5.0 hrs
actual work 3.5 hrs
complete 100 %
remaining work 0.0 hrs
This will enable to improve the planningHi Rene,
This is not possible. The work (planned work) will be equal to the acutal work.
What you can do is to use bsaeline: just baseline your project plan in order to keep the original scheduled work.
You'll have something like:
Baseline work: 5hrs
Work: 3.5hrs
Actual work: 3.5hrs
Remaining work: 0 hrs
% complete: 100%
Hope this helps,
Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MVP, MCP | -
When actual work goes over planned work
Is there a way to show that is a task is over 100% for work complete?
Here is the situation.
Planned work is 80 hrs and actual work is 93 hours but project shows work complete to 100% but the task is not finished yet.
Can I show over 100%?% complete is (Actual Duration/Duration) * 100
% Work Complete is (Actual work/work) * 100
As Guillaume notes, if the Actual work exceeds the original work estimate, Project will assume the task is complete. You can add the Remaining Work field to a task view but if you have multiple resources assigned you may wish to add the field to the
Task Usage view to capture Actual and Remaining Work on an assignment by assignment basis.
If you have saved a baseline before tracking - Project will calculate Work Variance for you -- the difference between baseline Work (your plan) and Work. -
Issue in Quantity " Actual" Quantity of a Planned Service - In serviceentry
Dear All,
I am have one issue client created the PO for service for 700 EA Qty price is 10 so Total =7000.00
Then he already made service entry for 300 qty . now in PO open Qty is 400.
now he is trying to make service entry for pending Qty 400 but system is giveing error if we enter 399 then system is accepting that one qty variation is comming.can you please tell me what i have to check
Note :I checked the service entry sheet in the qty field he entered 300 but in the actual qty 301 is showing how it is picked ???
Regards
MuruganHi Rakesh,
But he one service entry sheet then he for one Qty . but i checked in the materail doc ithink it is reversed.
Thanks i checked the same he did 300 qty only. for one service entry sheet.
yes I checked as per your advice it is showing Entered Qty is 301 and the accepted qty is 300
That one qty service entry sheet is showing No acceptanc. what i have to do can please tell me...
I have to reverese the Service entry sheet.??
Regards
Murugan -
AT / SKF report on ksu1 or ksv1 cycle
Hi,
In KSU1 or KSV1, we can define var portion type by actual SKF or AT or on plan cycle also.
May I know if there is a report to show the var portion type of distribution or assessment cycle is using AT or SKF?
It is quite difficult to locate the var portion type whether the cycle is using which method.
ThanksHi
There are no Standard Reports for that as far as I know.
Either you have to write the Query from Tables or You have to buildup a Z Program for it -
SKF transactional values based on company code
Can anybody let me know the logic how we can seggregate transactional value passed to statistical key figure based on company code or is there anytable where we can direclty find SKF transactions involved based on company code ?
Need to upload SKF transactional figures from one SAP system to another.Hence require process for extraction and uploading of the sameHi Amogh
Hope you are looking for actual SKF quantities posted. kindly check s_alr_87013611 CC report, I think on the lower part this comes. This time I am not in front of system so you please check.
Regards
Rajneesh -
Project System Costs: budget/actual/commt/rem.plan/assd
Hi all,
I'm trying to obtain the following information from PS report "s_alr_87013558" :
budget (I actually have it from table RPSCO1)
actual
commitment
remaining order plan costs
assigned
I've tried very hard to get this info from the logical database PSJ but I can't find it. I really need help on this, so I'll appreciate your comments. Regards!!Hi,
look table rpsco: field wrttp
wrttp description
41 budget
11 (Statistical)actual
22 Purchase Order Commitment
disposable = 41 -11 - 22.
regards Andreas
Maybe you are looking for
-
When I go into the export dialogue and select a portion of a file naming scheme, I cannot get it into the clipboard. I had wanted to cut a portion of the specification, export with an amended name, and then paste the original back. I am running the
-
Attaching iMac to the wall -- like a flatscreen ?!?!
Hi, I'm about to buy my FIRST apple in April, and looking into the iMacs. My husband & I were wondering if it's possible to remove the foot pedistol (spelling!?) from the screen, and attach the screen just to the wall, like a flatscreen. THis would b
-
I backed up my iphone and now cannot find pictures and contacts from backup
I backed up my iphone and now the pictures and contacts are gone and will not reload back onto phone.
-
Why can't I attach files from desktop to hotmail?
I'm trying to attach files to a "hotmail" message and my eMac just spins forever. There must be some security settings preventing this. Can anybody assist me? Thanks.
-
Hi. I have created a mock layout on Photoshop. When I preview it in the browser it doesn't fit in the browser correctly its not filling the page. How do I fix this?