Adding prepack to purchase order causes DCI flag to be set on components

When a prepack is added to a purchase order, the prepack does not have the DCI flag set but the components have the DCI flag ticked. Is this normal functionality? Or is there an error with our configuration of prepacks?
I should think that the DCI flag should be unticked for not only the prepack but its components as well.

Hi,
When you add the prepack to PO by default SAP puts the delivery completed indicator against the components, that's the stadard SAP behavior. However Prepack header should have delivery completed untick until you post the goods receipt. After the GR system puts tick mark against the prepack header as well.
hope this info will solve your query.

Similar Messages

When added a single purchase order the order being duplicated..

In 2007A SP01 PL10
When added a single purchase order, the order being duplicated into two different orders numbers in the system..
the problem is Inconsistent and occurs several times a day.
Does anyone know \ heard about the problem??
Thank You!
Meital

Are the duplicated PO's created by the add on, or through the application?
We do have a customer who is getting duplicated SO / PO/ Cash sale invoices at the rate of a few per month. They have an add on running as well and we have been unable to solve the issue for them.
The rate did improve after upgrading to SP01, but the issue has not disappeared.
There was another thread a while ago about someone getting duplicated credit notes, they also had an add on running but the add on was unrelated to credit notes.

Implementation Of Badi ME_GUI_PO_CUST for adding fields in Purchase Order

Hi All
I am implementing BADI ME_GUI_PO_CUST / ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST to add additional fields in Purchase Order.
The implementation of the BADI ie the Subscreen of the fields to be added appears in transaction ME23N but it does not appear in the transaction ME22N and ME21N.
Can anyone help me on this.
Thanx.
Moderator message - Duplicate post locked
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Jul 10, 2009 12:10 PM

check the answer
[New tabs added by Badi ME_GUI_PO_CUST not seen in ME21N and ME22N;
bye

Adding Partner into Purchase Order (ME21N, ME22N)

Hi,
I want to add a parnter into purchase order. Logic of determining of partner is very complex and I have to write a program for this purpose.
Are there any user exit where I can include this program and add additional line into EKPA?
Thanks in advise,
Hristo Hristov

Hi Sanjay,
All parameters of method POSTED of this BADI are "importing" - I can't add parntner into IM_EKPA
I need to add partner into PO and then use this partner role into output determination of same purchase order.

Adding TAB to purchase order header

I need to add a tab with additional fields to a purchase order header.
I know that I need to use a BAdI to do it but i do not know the procedure I need to follow.
Hope you can help me

sorry, I'm talking about the screen painter where you have changed SAPMV45A screen 4002.
Actually, I have had a look at screen 4002 and see that the tabstrip alrady exists so the wizard is no use to you here.
The error you are getting is because TAXI_TABSTRIP_CAPTIONS is a dictionary declared structure which has 32 fields. You cannot use a 'data' declaration of something which already exists. I don't know why you are trying to add the 33rd one but it doesn't look right to me to be trying.
If you really do have a need to change it then you will have to change the TAXI_TABSTRIP_CAPTIONS structure in the dictionary itself via SE11.

Adding Notes In Purchase order

Hi Gurus,
1.How to add Note to Supplier of data of A4 Size Paper in Purchase Order Other Than Attachment
2.If It IS Attachment How To Integrate it with the Po Print Out
3.This Note Must Be General And Should be Printed in All Po Standard Foramt How to integrate It Purchase Order As A default.
MUS

Shankar,
Other than attachment? can you elaborate on this?
For point 2, you may need a unix script to add the attachmnet to get it to attach the item to the PO that you will be printing and send it as an attachment. This could be done with a faxing software and some scripting. (NeoDocs or RightFax may do this for you)
3. if you are talking about the notes on the orders for people to see, the custom po print should be able to show this information. You may need to customise the po to show the information.

Regarding purchase order header deletion flag indicator

hi all,
Right now in SAP PO header deletion flag has been set to X.
so what i need is the PO should be flagged only at item level .
how can i proceed?where can i find the deletion flag in the transaction screen?

You can find in item overview (RM06E-LOEKZ)
a®

Reg:purchase order header deletion flag

hi all,
right now in SAP PO header deletion flag has been set to X.
so what i need is the PO should be flagged only at item level .
how can i proceed?where can i find the deletion flag in the transaction screen?

Hi,
To set deletion flag at PO item, select the item and click on delete icon (a garbage bin).
Cheers.
...Reward if useful.

Default value indicator Unlimited in Purchase Order

If I create Purchase order without Material Master where the account category is K (Cost Centre) and Item Category is D (Service), the indicator Unlimited is default ticked.
But when a second line has been added to the Purchase Order without material master and only account category K the indicator Unlimited is not ticked on.
After analysing in the IMG I could not find if this can be configured.
Is it possible to configure the default setting of the indicator Unlimited in Purchase Order?

Hi,
When you create a PO with an item category of D it changes the whole use of the line item on the PO. It no longer holds the detail data because this is held at a lower level. That is why the qty defaults to 1 etc.
There should not be any problems caused by the unlimited flag because the limits are now controlled at the extra level of the service specifications etc. This level has several limits to control the entry of services and so the flag at the item level above is basically redundant.
I am not aware of any config setting to change it and as I say I don't think that you will really need to change it? Do you have a specific reason to change it or where you just curious?
Steve B

Unable to update purchase order after partial delivery

bold Issue:
After upgrading from v2005 > v2007:
1) We created a PO with two different purchase items :
row 1: 10 pcs Item x
row 2: 15 pcs item Y
2) create a Goods Receipt PO based on the PO row 2 (15 pcs Item Y) so this row will be closed in the PO.
3) after saving the GRPO item Y is set as a non purchase item (deselected the tick box "Purchase Item" on the Item master), because the supplier will not be able to deliver this item again.
4) After changing item Y, we want to update the amount of Item X to for example 11 (instead of 10). This item is still a purchase item > while updating the PO the following error appears:
[Purchase Order - Rows - Item No.][line: 2] , 'The item is not a purchase item (2)' [Message 131-10]
In v2005 it was possible to follow the above procedure, however since the upgrade of v2007 the error appears.
The problem is that that it happens very often that the suppliers change the items, so they cannot be delivered anymore.
bold Below the response of SAP Support:
Line: -
Yes, I understand what you mean that the item you want to deliver is the other item PQ which is still a purchase item. However, the system does the checking based on document level, and not filtering only per Open rows. Hence, even if the item for B8 is fully closed, the system still detects that there is a non-purchase item in an open document (B8).
In order to update the other item PQ, please set the item B8 back to Purchase Item. Once the Sales Order is updated, you may update B8 again to Non Purchase.
If the possibility of using the 'Active/Inactive' button is not possible, another workaround is to use a User Define Field to flag the item. For example, you can set it as 'Y', when the supplier stopp ed selling the item. Then, in the Item Search window, you can filter the records to group those items that are set as 'Y' and the rest as 'N'. Only those 'N' items can be used when placing orders.
As an added procedure, you can generate an approval procedure that will be triggered when an item that is set as 'Y' in the User Defined field is added in the Purchase Order. When the approval is trig gered, the user can then re-verify the items added and make the necessary changes before saving the purchase document.
I hope the above workaround is suitable. I agree with the expected logic, but per Note937297, the stock status of an item is not meant to be changed after documents are added in the system. It seems a limitation in the current system.
Line: -
bold Solution:
The system should check if the open row can be delivered, since it still is a purchase item.
The provided workarounds are not an option for our customer, so we are looking forward to a positive reaction!
Kind regards,
Charlotte

Unable to update purchase order after partial delivery
Issue:
After upgrading from v2005 > v2007:
1) We created a PO with two different purchase items :
row 1: 10 pcs Item x
row 2: 15 pcs item Y
2) create a Goods Receipt PO based on the PO row 2 (15 pcs Item Y) so this row will be closed in the PO.
3) after saving the GRPO item Y is set as a non purchase item (deselected the tick box "Purchase Item" on the Item master), because the supplier will not be able to deliver this item again.
4) After changing item Y, we want to update the amount of Item X to for example 11 (instead of 10). This item is still a purchase item > while updating the PO the following error appears:
[Purchase Order - Rows - Item No.][line: 2] , 'The item is not a purchase item (2)' [Message 131-10]
In v2005 it was possible to follow the above procedure, however since the upgrade of v2007 the error appears.
The problem is that that it happens very often that the suppliers change the items, so they cannot be delivered anymore.
Below the response of SAP Support:
Yes, I understand what you mean that the item you want to deliver is the other item PQ which is still a purchase item. However, the system does the checking based on document level, and not filtering only per Open rows. Hence, even if the item for B8 is fully closed, the system still detects that there is a non-purchase item in an open document (B8).
In order to update the other item PQ, please set the item B8 back to Purchase Item. Once the Sales Order is updated, you may update B8 again to Non Purchase.
If the possibility of using the 'Active/Inactive' button is not possible, another workaround is to use a User Define Field to flag the item. For example, you can set it as 'Y', when the supplier stopp ed selling the item. Then, in the Item Search window, you can filter the records to group those items that are set as 'Y' and the rest as 'N'. Only those 'N' items can be used when placing orders.
As an added procedure, you can generate an approval procedure that will be triggered when an item that is set as 'Y' in the User Defined field is added in the Purchase Order. When the approval is trig gered, the user can then re-verify the items added and make the necessary changes before saving the purchase document.
I hope the above workaround is suitable. I agree with the expected logic, but per Note937297, the stock status of an item is not meant to be changed after documents are added in the system. It seems a limitation in the current system.
Solution:
The system should check if the open row can be delivered, since it still is a purchase item.
The provided workarounds are not an option for our customer, so we are looking forward to a positive reaction!
Kind regards,
Charlotte

List of purchase orders is empty on Goods Receipt PO

Hi,
a user can't see the purchase order lists (empty result) when he clicks the "copy from" button on Good Receipt PO, although he just added several new purchase orders (hence they are still open). The weird thing is, another user with the same authorizations (I copied the authorizations) can see the results.
Does anyone know why? Is there any setup or permission I should be aware of?
Thanks!!
Andre

Hi,
Did the user fill out the BP details? You will see the PO's only after choosing a supplier.
Regards,
Nat

PREREQUISITE FOR PURCHASE ORDER MASS MAINTENENCE

Dear Experts,
Please explain the prerequisite points for the purchase order Mass Maintenance.
i want to set Delivery completed indicator for the open purchase orders.
is it prerequisite for setting the deletion flag to the purchase order items.
if delivered quantity is more the PO order quantity, it is not allowing to set the deletion flag
also it issues the warning message of release PO - Release already affected.
Please explain the concept in brief.
Thanks in Advance

Hi,
When you set the "delivery completed" indicator, it considers a purchase order item to be closed. This means that no more goods receipts are expected for this item. If the "delivery completed" indicator is set, the open purchase order quantity becomes zero, even if the full quantity has not been delivered. It is still possible to post goods receipts for the remaining quantities.
When you set the "delivery completed" indicator:
The purchase order item is considered closed, even though the total quantity may not have been delivered.
Although a further delivery is not expected, it is still possible.
At the time of the next goods receipt, the system suggests the item as unselected in the item selection list.
The purchase order item can be deleted, even if the total quantity was not delivered..
Thanks and Regards,
Maheshwari

Add Z conditions in the Purchase Order

Hi Gurus,
We have created a Z condition in the RM0000 pricing procedure and we have addded a requirement and Formula for the same.
If the requirement matches, then Formula is executed for assigning value in this condition. Now, when I try to create Purchase Orders using transaction ME59n, it works fine. Condition is added in the purchase orders that match the requirement.
Now, when I try to create the purchase order through a background job, condition is not getting added in it. I debugged the background job, and requirement is satisfied for the Purchase Order.
Can anyone help me in this issue.
Thanks in Advance,
Amit Rai

I have scheduled a job using transaction SM36, that runs the program RM06BB30 (transaction ME59n) in the background.
Regards,
Amit

"Actual" value in purchase order

Hello everyone,
We´ve detected that this field is not showing the sum of the entered service entry sheets.
This field is showing a greater value than the total of service entries created.
Anyone know if there is any error at standard system that doesn´t refresh well this value??
Thank you everyone in advance.
Regards,
cecil

Hi,
I think in this case there is some inconsistency in your system.
To correct the relevant purchase orders just use report RMBESTK3 which
should be implemented in your system. If it is not, this report is
also documented in note 126285.
Just run this report RMBESTK3 for the relevant service purchase orders
(with test flag for the first run).
And also refer the note 198253 .
For blanket purchase orders please use the report in note 198253.
Regards,
Srikanth.

Cant able to do UD for Goods Receipt Inspection against Purchase Order

Hi Experts,
I am facing problem while doing UD for Goods Receipt Inspection against Purchase Order.
The Problem is,
"Selected set code does not exist, or data entered is incomplete
Message no. QV121
Diagnosis
Code in code group * (selected set 1000 in plant ) does not exist.
Procedure
Enter a valid combination or complete combination, or make sure that the combination is available in the selected set."
And the Result Recording for Inspection lot is completed.
kindly suggest..
Thanks in Advance,
Naveen

Hi Naveen,
1.     Go to QCC0 > Quality inspection > Inspection lot creation > Maintain Inspection Types > Select 01 (or the type which you are using) and double click on it.
2.     Check what code is maintained in UD Selected Set
3.     Create the same code in QS51 for your plant.
Regards,
Anand Rao

Adding prepack to purchase order causes DCI flag to be set on components

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for