Adding threshold values in an existing query

Hi All,
I have to update an existing query.
The original query gives me the value of Debtors to sales ratio for each division (DTR value).
Now, I want that for each division, there be a threshold value which should be compared with the debtor's value and if found higher than the threshold, the result should be in red.
The result being in red can be done at the front end, which in my case is Cognos.
But to store different threshold values for diffrerent divisions and then compare them with the debtor's values of the query, do I need to have a separate cube wherein I should store the divisions and their threshold values?
Or how can I go about it?
Thanks and best regards,
Sharmishtha

Hi Nagesh,
I do not have those values in the system but will be getting as external data only.
Divisions and debtors are separate info objects.
I have 12 debtors KFs (for 12 months) which get filled by an APD (data source is a query).
So, my final query has divisions in the rows and 12 debtors in the colm.
So, now i'll be given some threshold debtor value for each division which I need to bring in the query as a KF which can be compared in the query output.
So, what you suggested will it work in this requirement?
Also, can you elaborate on the method I need to follow?
Thanks a lot,
Sharmishtha

Similar Messages

Adding a field in already existing query layout

Hi All,
I have a requirement where I have to add couple of fields in an already existing query layout.
Through SQ01 and layout painter I have added the fields to the layout. When I test from query painter it displays the newly added fields. But when I execute the transaction that is designated to run the query its not displaying those fields.
What am I missing here?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Arun

Arun,
As you have done some changes to the query,the internal report generator will generate a new program correspponding to the Query which should be attached to the T-code.
Currently the t-code might be having the earlier program name ie the program generated by the query before changes were made hence it is not displaying.
Just check the program name of the Query and the program name attached to the tcode.
K.Kiran.

Adding Additional Tables to an Existing Query

Dear All
I have the following tables and relationships:
I have the following query that returns records from the table SENAlert where the StudentID and the TeacherUsername are passed in as parameters.
Also, records are only returned if there isn’t a corresponding record in the SENAlertHistory table (i.e. SENAlertHistorySENAlertID IS NULL).
This query is returning the results that I would expect:
SELECT
SENAlert.SENAlertID, SENAlertType.SENAlertTypeDescription
FROM
SENAlertHistory RIGHT OUTER JOIN
Teacher INNER JOIN
Class ON Teacher.TeacherCode = Class.ClassTeacherCode INNER JOIN
ClassMember INNER JOIN
SENAlert INNER JOIN
SENAlertType ON SENAlert.SENAlertType = SENAlertType.SENAlertTypeID INNER JOIN
Student ON SENAlert.SENAlertStudentID = Student.StudentID ON ClassMember.ClassMemberStudentID = Student.StudentID ON
Class.ClassClassCode = ClassMember.ClassMemberClassCode ON SENAlertHistory.SENAlertHistorySENAlertID = SENAlert.SENAlertID AND
SENAlertHistory.SENAlertHistoryTeacherCode = Teacher.TeacherCode
WHERE
(Student.StudentID = 011763) AND (Teacher.TeacherUsername = 'dsmith') AND (SENAlertHistory.SENAlertHistorySENAlertID IS NULL)
However, I need to extend this query to include additional teachers who may also teach this student. I am trying to add in 3 additional copies of
the Teacher table as Teacher_1, Teacher_3 and Teacher _3 in order to include them in the query also.
However, when I add these tables in I no longer get any results returned.
I have managed to do this on other queries but not this one.
SELECT SENAlert.SENAlertID, SENAlertType.SENAlertTypeDescription
FROM SENAlertHistory INNER JOIN
Teacher ON SENAlertHistory.SENAlertHistoryTeacherCode = Teacher.TeacherCode INNER JOIN
Teacher AS Teacher_1 ON SENAlertHistory.SENAlertHistoryTeacherCode = Teacher_1.TeacherCode INNER JOIN
Teacher AS Teacher_2 ON SENAlertHistory.SENAlertHistoryTeacherCode = Teacher_2.TeacherCode INNER JOIN
Teacher AS Teacher_3 ON SENAlertHistory.SENAlertHistoryTeacherCode = Teacher_3.TeacherCode RIGHT OUTER JOIN
Class INNER JOIN
ClassMember INNER JOIN
SENAlert INNER JOIN
SENAlertType ON SENAlert.SENAlertType = SENAlertType.SENAlertTypeID INNER JOIN
Student ON SENAlert.SENAlertStudentID = Student.StudentID ON ClassMember.ClassMemberStudentID = Student.StudentID ON
Class.ClassClassCode = ClassMember.ClassMemberClassCode ON Teacher_3.TeacherCode = Class.ClassTeacherCode AND
Teacher_2.TeacherCode = Class.ClassTeacherCode AND Teacher_1.TeacherCode = Class.ClassTeacherCode AND
Teacher.TeacherCode = Class.ClassTeacherCode AND SENAlertHistory.SENAlertHistorySENAlertID = SENAlert.SENAlertID
WHERE (Student.StudentID = 011763) AND (SENAlertHistory.SENAlertHistorySENAlertID IS NULL)
AND (Teacher.TeacherUsername = 'admin\dsmith' OR Teacher_1.TeacherUsername = 'admin\dsmith' OR Teacher_2.TeacherUsername = 'admin\dsmith' OR Teacher_3.TeacherUsername = 'admin\dsmith')
No results are returned from this adapted query. I have noticed that by adding the additional tables, it keeps changing the type of joins that I
have between certain tables. I have tried all sorts of combinations but haven't been able to make it work.
I would be really grateful for any advice that you may be able to offer.
Many thanks
Daniel

Dear All
I followed the advice and created the query again from scratch, one table and relationship at a time checking that I am getting the expected result. I have put much of the query back together with the correct output:
SELECT
SENAlert.SENAlertID,
SENAlertType.SENAlertTypeDescription
FROM dbo.SENAlert
INNER JOIN dbo.SENAlertType
ON SENAlert.SENAlertType = SENAlertType.SENAlertTypeID
INNER JOIN dbo.Student
ON SENAlert.SENAlertStudentID = Student.StudentID
INNER JOIN dbo.ClassMember
ON ClassMember.ClassMemberStudentID = Student.StudentID
INNER JOIN dbo.Class
ON ClassMember.ClassMemberClassCode = Class.ClassClassCode
INNER JOIN dbo.Teacher
ON Class.ClassTeacherCode = Teacher.TeacherCode
LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.Teacher AdditionalTeacher1
ON AdditionalTeacher1.TeacherCode = Class.ClassAdditionalTeacherCode1
LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.Teacher AdditionalTeacher2
ON AdditionalTeacher2.TeacherCode = Class.ClassAdditionalTeacherCode2
LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.Teacher AdditionalTeacher3
ON AdditionalTeacher3.TeacherCode = Class.ClassAdditionalTeacherCode3
WHERE Student.StudentID = 011763
AND (Teacher.TeacherUsername = 'admin\dsmith'
OR AdditionalTeacher1.TeacherUsername = 'admin\dsmith'
OR AdditionalTeacher2.TeacherUsername = 'admin\dsmith'
OR AdditionalTeacher3.TeacherUsername = 'admin\dsmith')
The problem arises when I try to add the SENAlertHistory table back in. I only want to show results where a related record does not exist in SENAlertHistory. I have tried every combination of relationship but none have been successful.
I think maybe I need to be using a subquery instead.
Thanks for your help
Daniel
do you mean this?
SELECT
SENAlert.SENAlertID,
SENAlertType.SENAlertTypeDescription
FROM dbo.SENAlert
INNER JOIN dbo.SENAlertType
ON SENAlert.SENAlertType = SENAlertType.SENAlertTypeID
INNER JOIN dbo.Student
ON SENAlert.SENAlertStudentID = Student.StudentID
INNER JOIN dbo.ClassMember
ON ClassMember.ClassMemberStudentID = Student.StudentID
INNER JOIN dbo.Class
ON ClassMember.ClassMemberClassCode = Class.ClassClassCode
INNER JOIN dbo.Teacher
ON Class.ClassTeacherCode = Teacher.TeacherCode
AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1
FROM SENAlertHistory
WHERE SENALertHistoryTeacherCode = Teacher.TeacherCode
AND SENAlertHistorySENAlertID = SENAlert.SENAlertID)LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.Teacher AdditionalTeacher1
ON AdditionalTeacher1.TeacherCode = Class.ClassAdditionalTeacherCode1
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM SENAlertHistory
WHERE SENAlertHistoryTeacherCode = AdditionalTeacher1.TeacherCode
AND SENAlertHistorySENAlertID = SENAlert.SENAlertID
LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.Teacher AdditionalTeacher2
ON AdditionalTeacher2.TeacherCode = Class.ClassAdditionalTeacherCode2
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM SENAlertHistory
WHERE SENAlertHistoryTeacherCode = AdditionalTeacher2.TeacherCode
AND SENAlertHistorySENAlertID = SENAlert.SENAlertID
LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.Teacher AdditionalTeacher3
ON AdditionalTeacher3.TeacherCode = Class.ClassAdditionalTeacherCode3
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM SENAlertHistory
WHERE SENAlertHistoryTeacherCode = AdditionalTeacher3.TeacherCode
AND SENAlertHistorySENAlertID = SENAlert.SENAlertID
WHERE Student.StudentID = 011763
AND (Teacher.TeacherUsername = 'admin\dsmith'
OR AdditionalTeacher1.TeacherUsername = 'admin\dsmith'
OR AdditionalTeacher2.TeacherUsername = 'admin\dsmith'
OR AdditionalTeacher3.TeacherUsername = 'admin\dsmith')
Please Mark This As Answer if it helps to solve the issue Visakh ---------------------------- http://visakhm.blogspot.com/ https://www.facebook.com/VmBlogs

No data found due to cost element adding leading values in report

Hi Experts,
I have an issue where when the run the analyser with some values in variable screen it is displaying the output correctly in analyser tool. I am filtering the cost element with a single value for ex 4545000 and I have kept that in rows . Still the report is working fine. But then when I go back to variable screen and change the input for ex instead of period 3 if I change it to 4 , output is null since the cost element is adding leading values to the existing value in the filter and displaying no result. for ex 4545000 is getting added with controlling area 0050 and its searching for 00500004545000 and since this is not the cost element value its not displaying output..
Any ideas how to rectify this or is it a analyser tool issue..
Thanks in advance
Kishore

Hi,
In my system it looks like this:
Note that superior infoobject to 0costcenter is 0co_area
Hope this helps,
Leszek

Adding new value fields to an existing and productive operating concern

Hi,
I would like to have 5 new value fields active in 4 out of 6 operating concerns that I am working with.
Is it correct that I could do this one of the following ways:
1. Use a value field that exists already in an operating concern and rename it?
In this case is it necessary to regenerate the operating concern?
Do I transport the change ?
2. Create an entirely new value field, and assign it to the operating concern?
Is it necessary to regenerate the operating concerns in question?
Do I transport the change?
3. Select a value field that is currently in the system but is not assigned to any operating concern eg some kind of SAP delivered value field? How do I assign it to the op con? Do I need to re gen the op con?
Which way is the best or is there a 4th option?
Thanks for your help in adviance
Regards
Aisling

Hi,
This note is a catalogue of notes of consulting notes where SAP tell you steps, reports to use and son . If you read them (these notes and related notes) you have the steps, guides, reports that you must use. Better advice. Try a solution with all steps in mind and check it in a quality enviroment. As you know there a lot of things in CO-PA concern (you have your own tables, with your own fields, your reports as KE2Rxxxx, and so on), your secondary indexes, etc.. , the best is try the solution in your Quality Enviroment (a quasi-clone of your production enviroment) and check the results (create SO, invoices, after modifications to check possible problems,...).
Regards,
Eduardo
pd: I forgot. If the size of tables (CE4xxxx, CE1XXXX, ...check them with DB02) are so big, get the opinion of a Basis Consultant. Surely in the before note there notes about this issue.
Edited by: Eduardo Hinojosa on Apr 23, 2010 2:41 PM

Adding additional fields to Existing query

Hi all,
There is an existing query in our system and now the requirement is to add and insert few fields to the existing fields of output of that query.
Please let me know step by step procedure to achieve this.
Thanks in advance-

It depends upon the type of Query you have. Is it a Quick View, an ABAP Query, or are you trying to make changes to an ABAP Report?

How to modify an existing query to add a column

Hi all, I have an existing query :
SELECT 2 as SOURCE_SYSTEM_ID, LI.IPROD AS SYSTEM_ID, LI.IPROD AS PART_NUMBER, LI.IDESC AS PART_DESCRIPTION, IsNULL((SELECT LZ.CCDESC FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ZCC LZ WHERE (LZ.CCTABL = 'SIRF2') AND LI.IREF02 = LZ.CCCODE), '') AS PLANT_CODE, LIS.ISSTSD
AS lifecycle_status, CASE LI.ILDTE WHEN 0 THEN convert(date, GETDATE()) ELSE (SUBSTRing(convert(varchar, LI.ILDTE), 1,4)+'-'+SUBSTRing(convert(varchar,LI.ILDTE), 5,2)+'-'+SUBSTRing(convert(varCHAR,LI.ILDTE), 7,2)) END AS LAST_ACTIVITY_DATE,
LZPA.DATA AS PRODUCTION_TYPE, (CASE (LI.IITYP) WHEN '6' THEN 'SERVICE' ELSE 'ITEM' END) AS ITEM_TYPE, LI.IVEND AS PRIMARY_VENDOR, (SELECT LZ.CCDESC FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ZCC LZ WHERE LZ.CCTABL='UNITMEAS' AND LZ.CCCODE=LI.IUMS AND LZ.CCLANG = '') AS
UOM_INVENTORY, (SELECT LZ.CCDESC FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ZCC LZ WHERE LZ.CCTABL='UNITMEAS' AND LZ.CCCODE=LI.IUMS AND LZ.CCLANG = '') AS UOM_BOM, (SELECT LZ.CCDESC FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ZCC LZ WHERE LZ.CCTABL='UNITMEAS' AND LZ.CCCODE=LI. IUMR
AND LZ.CCLANG = '') AS UOM_SELL, (SELECT LZ.CCDESC FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ZCC LZ WHERE LZ.CCTABL='UNITMEAS' AND LZ.CCCODE=LI.IUMP AND LZ.CCLANG = '') AS UOM_PURCHASE, IsNULL((SELECT LZ.CCDESC FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ZCC LZ WHERE LZ.CCTABL='BUYER'
AND LZ.CCCODE=LI.IPURC), '') AS BUYER, (LI.IMHIGH) AS ITEM_HEIGHT, SUBSTRING(IsNULL((SELECT LZ.CCDESC FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ZCC LZ WHERE LZ.CCTABL='SIRF5' AND LZ.CCCODE=LI.IREF05), ''), 1, 20) AS APPLICATIONS, IsNULL((SELECT LZ.CCDESC FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ZCC
LZ WHERE LZ.CCTABL='SIRF3' AND LZ.CCCODE=LI.IREF03), '') AS PORGRAM, (LI.IMWIDE) AS ITEM_WIDTH, LI.IMLONG AS ITEM_DEPTH, LI.IWGHT AS ITEM_WEIGHT_NET, LI.IMNNWU AS ITEM_WEIGHT_TARE FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.IIM LI, HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ISC LIS,HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ZPA
LZPA WHERE LI.ICOND = LIS.ISSTSC AND LZPA.PKEY=('ITEMTYP'+LI.IITYP )
Now I need to add a column called WORK_CENTER. I added a subquery to the existing one. It looks like this:
SELECT 2 as SOURCE_SYSTEM_ID, LI.IPROD AS SYSTEM_ID, LI.IPROD AS PART_NUMBER, LI.IDESC AS PART_DESCRIPTION, IsNULL((SELECT LZ.CCDESC FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ZCC LZ WHERE (LZ.CCTABL = 'SIRF2') AND LI.IREF02 = LZ.CCCODE), '') AS PLANT_CODE, LIS.ISSTSD
AS lifecycle_status, CASE LI.ILDTE WHEN 0 THEN convert(date, GETDATE()) ELSE (SUBSTRing(convert(varchar, LI.ILDTE), 1,4)+'-'+SUBSTRing(convert(varchar,LI.ILDTE), 5,2)+'-'+SUBSTRing(convert(varCHAR,LI.ILDTE), 7,2)) END AS LAST_ACTIVITY_DATE,
LZPA.DATA AS PRODUCTION_TYPE, (CASE (LI.IITYP) WHEN '6' THEN 'SERVICE' ELSE 'ITEM' END) AS ITEM_TYPE, LI.IVEND AS PRIMARY_VENDOR, (SELECT LZ.CCDESC FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ZCC LZ WHERE LZ.CCTABL='UNITMEAS' AND LZ.CCCODE=LI.IUMS AND LZ.CCLANG = '') AS
UOM_INVENTORY, (SELECT LZ.CCDESC FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ZCC LZ WHERE LZ.CCTABL='UNITMEAS' AND LZ.CCCODE=LI.IUMS AND LZ.CCLANG = '') AS UOM_BOM, (SELECT LZ.CCDESC FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ZCC LZ WHERE LZ.CCTABL='UNITMEAS' AND LZ.CCCODE=LI. IUMR
AND LZ.CCLANG = '') AS UOM_SELL, (SELECT LZ.CCDESC FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ZCC LZ WHERE LZ.CCTABL='UNITMEAS' AND LZ.CCCODE=LI.IUMP AND LZ.CCLANG = '') AS UOM_PURCHASE, IsNULL((SELECT LZ.CCDESC FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ZCC LZ WHERE LZ.CCTABL='BUYER'
AND LZ.CCCODE=LI.IPURC), '') AS BUYER, (LI.IMHIGH) AS ITEM_HEIGHT, SUBSTRING(IsNULL((SELECT LZ.CCDESC FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ZCC LZ WHERE LZ.CCTABL='SIRF5' AND LZ.CCCODE=LI.IREF05), ''), 1, 20) AS APPLICATIONS, IsNULL((SELECT LZ.CCDESC FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ZCC
LZ WHERE LZ.CCTABL='SIRF3' AND LZ.CCCODE=LI.IREF03), '') AS PORGRAM, (LI.IMWIDE) AS ITEM_WIDTH, LI.IMLONG AS ITEM_DEPTH, LI.IWGHT AS ITEM_WEIGHT_NET, LI.IMNNWU AS ITEM_WEIGHT_TARE,
(SELECT LC.LWRKC FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.LCR LC WHERE RTRIM(LTRIM(LC.LITEM)) = RTRIM(LTRIM(LI.IPROD)) ) AS WORK_CENTER FROM HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.IIM LI, HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ISC LIS,HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.ZPA LZPA WHERE
LI.ICOND = LIS.ISSTSC AND LZPA.PKEY=('ITEMTYP'+LI.IITYP )
Please see the bolded and italic part. The problem is that the subquery is non distinct. I am getting an error "
Msg 512, Level 16, State 1, Line 2
Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression."
Can you let me know how I can resolve this issue? it is an urgent request. Thank you
Thank You Warmest Fanny Pied

I was given the existing query and the subquery as they were. The subquery is as it is returning multiple records on the columns selected. The person who give me the sub query is sure those are the correct tables to use to develope/change the
query.
select
DISTINCT a.litem,
b.IPROD,b.idesc,a.lwrkc
from HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.LCR
a, HCMEUP01.FRDA385A.LBPCSF.IIM
b
where
a.litem=b.iprod
Thank you for your help.
Thank You Warmest Fanny Pied

Problem adding a new field to existing BPS planning layout

Hi
I am new to BPS and planning
I have a requirement to add a new field which has values maintained as 0 and 1 to an existing planning cube.The user wants this new field in the existing planning layout where in he can enter the values for this field as 0 or 1.I have created a new field and maintained values for this field as 0 and 1.I have added this field to the existing planning area and have created variable with fixed value with range 0 to1.I have added the same in selections in existing planning level and package as well along with other existing selection conditions.
In additional functions of adhoc package they have made setting as set to all possible char combination.
In this planning area all the selections are locked in planning level and package.
Now when i execute the planning layout to enter data,my new field is grayed out,it does not allow me to enter the values.need help with this as to how can i make this field input enabled.This is an independent characteristic.
Thanks
Panchan

Hi,
Yu need to delete the data to fill the new field again.
Assign points if it helps
Regards,
Srinivas

Maintaining operating concern after adding new value field

Hello,
I added a new value field to our live operating concern,maintained the data structure throguh KEA0(Maintain operating concern).The changes are transported from Development to Quality,Changes were reflected in Q system.After testing in Q system transports were pushed to production system.The new value field is added to the operating concern. When i check the log for KEA0 in production system it displayed one message like:
Field VV088 was added to the reference structure
Message no. KE782.You probably either changed the operating concern or SAP-EIS aspect, and added the field VV099 to the definition.
The added a CO-PA value field:
In this case, the field is added to the definition or the summarization levels. This invalidates all existing levels. Consequently, you need to activate them again and fill them with data.
In production system maintaining operating concenr or KEAO is only in display mode.Is it needed to regenerate the operating concern once again in production, how to do it. Is the message talking about the KEDV summarization levels.?
thanks
rahul

Hi,
No no ....KEDV is nothing to do here....that is creation of summarization in CO-PA.
Since you added new value field you necessarily have to Regenerate the operating concern...
Use Tcode KEA0...go to Environment tab...there the status of Cross client part and client specific part both will be in RED....now just click on the Cross client (candle button)...now the system would regenerate the operating concern...once it is over do the same for the client specific...
Beware when you do regenerate the operating concern no body can enter any transaction in that server since it is cross client table ...hence better do it after business hours.
Hope this helps!
Running KEDU with rebuild is relevant only when you already have created summarization and called up the same in the CO-PA report "options" tab. If you did not created the summarization you are nothing to do with KEDU.
Next: The new value field has to be transported to PRD and hence even in PRD we have to do the regeneration manually.
Regards,
Velumani
Message was edited by: Velumani Arunachalam
Message was edited by: Velumani Arunachalam

Adding a new column to af:query on af:table

Hi,
I have an ADF table added to a jspx page as below:
<af:table value="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVO1.collectionModel}" var="row"
rows="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVO1.rangeSize}"
emptyText="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVO1.viewable ? coregccomplianceuiBundle.MSG_NO_DATA_DISPLAY : coregccomplianceuiBundle.MSG_ACCESS_DENIED}"
fetchSize="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVO1.rangeSize}"
rowBandingInterval="25" rowSelection="multiple" id="ruleLib"
binding="#{viewScope.rule_librarybean.rulet}"
columnStretching="column:c4"
selectionListener="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVO1.collectionModel.makeCurrent}"
summary="#{coregccomplianceuiBundle.RULE_LIB_SUMMARY}"
disableColumnReordering="true">
<f:facet name="contextMenu">
<af:popup id="Ctablemenup" contentDelivery="immediate">
<af:menu id="_menuActionp">
<af:group id="g5p">
<af:commandMenuItem ......
</af:commandMenuItem>
</af:group>
</af:menu>
</af:popup>
</f:facet>
<af:column id="c6" width="10" rowHeader="true"/>
<af:column sortProperty="IsSystem" sortable="true"
headerText="#{coregccomplianceuiBundle.BLANKTEXT}" id="c13"
rowHeader="unstyled" width="16">
<af:switcher id="sw1" facetName="#{row.IsSystem}" defaultFacet="1">
<f:facet name="1">
<af:panelGroupLayout id="pg1" layout="horizontal">
<af:image source="/images/lock_ena.png" id="cil1"
shortDesc="#{coregccomplianceuiBundle.SYSTEM_DEFINED_COMPLIANCE_RULE}"/>
</af:panelGroupLayout>
</f:facet>
<f:facet name="0">
<af:panelGroupLayout id="pg1-1" layout="horizontal">
<af:image source="/images/blank.gif" id="ot11"
shortDesc="#{coregccomplianceuiBundle.USER_DEFINED_COMPLIANCE_RULE}"/>

</af:panelGroupLayout>
</f:facet>
</af:switcher>
</af:column>
<af:column sortProperty="RuleDname" sortable="true"
headerText="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVO1.hints.RuleDname.label}"
id="c3" width="200" rowHeader="unstyled">
<af:commandLink action="#{viewScope.rule_librarybean.handleDetails}"
text="#{row.RuleDname}" id="ot1l"/>

</af:column>
<af:column sortProperty="TargetTypeDisplayName" sortable="true"
headerText="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVO1.hints.TargetTypeDisplayName.label}"
id="c2" width="150">
<af:outputText value="#{row.TargetTypeDisplayName}" id="soc1"/>
</af:column>
<af:column sortProperty="Description" sortable="true"
headerText="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVO1.hints.Description.label}"
id="c4" noWrap="false">
<af:outputText value="#{row.Description}" id="ot3"/>
</af:column>
<af:column sortProperty="RuleTypeUI" sortable="true"
headerText="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVO1.hints.RuleTypeUI.label}"
id="c1" width="150">
<af:outputText value="#{row.RuleTypeUI}" id="ot2"/>
</af:column>
<af:column sortProperty="LifeCyleStateUI" sortable="true"
headerText="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVO1.hints.LifeCyleStateUI.label}"
id="c5" width="150">
<af:outputText value="#{row.LifeCyleStateUI}" id="ot4"/>
</af:column>
<af:column headerText="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVO1.hints.Keywords.label}"
id="c7" sortProperty="Keywords" sortable="true"
noWrap="false">
<af:inputText value="#{row.Keywords}" id="ot5" label="#{coregccomplianceuiBundle.BLANKTEXT}"
readOnly="true"/>
</af:column>
<af:column headerText="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVO1.hints.Author.label}"
id="c8" sortProperty="Author" sortable="true">
<af:outputText value="#{row.Author}" id="ot6"/>
</af:column>
<af:column headerText="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVO1.hints.SeverityUI.label}"
id="c9" visible="false">
<af:outputText value="#{row.SeverityUI}" id="ot7"/>
</af:column>
<af:column headerText="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVO1.hints.LastUpdatedBy.label}"
id="c10" visible="false">
<af:outputText value="#{row.LastUpdatedBy}" id="ot8"/>
</af:column>
<af:column headerText="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVO1.hints.LastUpdatedDate.label}"
id="c11" sortProperty="LastUpdatedDate" sortable="true">
<af:outputText value="#{row.LastUpdatedDate}" id="ot9">
<af:convertDateTime type="both" dateStyle="medium"
timeStyle="full"/>
</af:outputText>
</af:column>
<af:column headerText="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVO1.hints.Owner.label}"
id="c12" visible="false">
<af:outputText value="#{row.Owner}" id="ot10"/>
</af:column>
</af:table>
I also have a search option added to the page as:
<af:query id="qryId2"
headerText="#{coregccomplianceuiBundle.COMPLIANCE_SEARCH}"
disclosed="false"
value="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVOCriteriaQuery.queryDescriptor}"
model="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVOCriteriaQuery.queryModel}"
queryListener="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVOCriteriaQuery.processQuery}"
queryOperationListener="#{bindings.RuleLibraryVOCriteriaQuery.processQueryOperation}"
resultComponentId="::pc1:ruleLib" rows="3" maxColumns="2"
saveQueryMode="hidden"/>
The VO Criteria that is used by this search query is having 5 columns which are searchable now i want to add one more column which can be searched.
I have added the colum to VO Criteria query
But then also the 6th search column is not visible in UI.
Can anyone suggest what am i missing???

1) Check if the corresponding VO attribute is defined as "Queryable"
2) Check if the Rendered Mode of the corresponding criterion of the VO Criteria is "All" (the Rendered Mode is defined in the "Hints" page of the VO Criteria dialog box, select the criterion in order to see its Rendered Mode)
Dimitar

Impact of adding new value fields in ongoing operating concern.

Hi All,
Want to know the steps of adding new value fields in the existing operating concern in COPA?
What is the overall impact of addition of New Value fields in the running Operating Concern?
How do we test the addition of new value fields?
Is the addition of New Value fields to the running Operating Concern advisable?
Your support and advice is highly anticipated and appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
9819528669

HI,
please search in SCN forum before you post:
Re: Adding a ValueField to an existing Operating Concern?
Best regards, Christian

Managing threshold value of document library

Hi,
We are managing below stuff through .net application
1)Uploading the document to current Month folder in a document library , While uploading a document check for the current month folder , if it does not exists create a new folder with month and year format.
2) After uploading a document, storing the file URL in SQL table i.e. through stored procedure.
3) While retrieving we are using the DB link to display the pdf in application.
Now have migrated this to SharePoint 2010
We are using share point 2010 document library, with multiple folders. The library has now exceeded 5,000 items.
As a result it is not allowing the users to update the documents to a document library, now we are receiving a list view threshold error.
So now my question is if I increase the threshold value, will it be proper solution?
After increasing the threshold value, will the performance be affected?
Please share your ideas/thoughts on the same.
Regards,
Sudheer
Thanks & Regards, Sudheer

Hi,
Instead of increasing the threshold limit,finally i felt folder structure would be good enough i.e
1) Generally for the bulk documents if pretty good enough i.e.
Uploading the documents in the folder week wise of the document library.
So in case if there are 1000 documents in the folder, count would be 1 only.
So this is a good practice for the large number of documents to upload in document library.
2) Coming to file path,
After uploading the document, file path can be saved under column of type hyperlink in the list.
Same folder structure can be followed to save file path in the list
3) We can fetch the file path from the list to display the pdf.
Please correct me if i am wrong.
Regards,
Naga Sudheer M
Thanks & Regards, Sudheer

Changing Time Zone (stsadm tzmove) = Error: Adding a value to a 'datetime' column caused an overflow

After updating timezone.xml и RGNLSTNG.xml files for my SharePoint 2010 (SP2 - 14.0.7015.1000)
I have to run this command to Update time zone on calendar events:
stsadm -o tzmove -name "russ2014" -update all
But this cause an error: Adding a value to a 'datetime' column caused an overflow
ULS log event: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Adding a value to a 'datetime' column caused an overflow. The statement has been terminated.
How to fix this?

Hi,
Whether you added new time zone definition to your timezone.xml
and RGNLSTNG.xml files. if not, please provide the details about what content you updated in timezone.xml and RGNLSTNG.xml files.
The stsadm.exe –o tzmove command does not work for new time zone definition changes.
This command is designed for making changes in the existing time zone,
not for creating a new time zone definition.
After you modify the Timezone.xml and Regnlstng.xml files to include the new time zone definition, you must restart Internet Information Services (IIS).
To do this, click Start, click Run, type
iisreset in the Open box, and then click
OK.
Try to do IIS restart, compare the results.
Best Regards,
Lisa Chen
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]

Remome "Manual value entry" possibility in query filter

Hi everybody, i'm currently using Bex ver 7.0 and i have a problem. I need to find a way to dissable the possibility to enter any value manually in a query's filter. For example, when i run a query and i see the filter, let's say "Coste Center" the filter variable gives me the range of values, but also it gives me the values that had been entered before "History" and below it gives me the possibility to enter the values manually. I need to dissable this option, it has to be just the filter with authorixed values to choose from, no "History data" nor this little window for manual antry.
Do you happen to know if this possibility exist?
Thank you very much.
P.D. the points will be awarded for all your ideas!!

Hi,
In the variable properties window, uncheck the "Ready for Input".
It will solve the problem.
Assign points if it helps.....

Modify existing query in Discoverer Report

Hi,
1) I want to put an outer join to the existing discoverer work sheet query. Is there any way I could do it.
2) I am trying to modify the query by Export and Import options in the Discoverer Desktop and I am getting the below error. All I did was added (+) in the existing query
Error: No EUL folders based on table AR_LOOKUPS found.
was there any thing I am missing here?
Thank you,
Prashanth

There seems to be a little confusion in the details mentioned.
First check on which folder, Business Area is the report based on. Then is that folder a Sql folder or a table/view ?
Then in the source you may have to change the code add outer joins etc., Not in the Discoverer Report.
From what I think is export/import does not work in this scenario.

Adding threshold values in an existing query

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for