Additional tax

Dear forum,
In tax processing in accounting OBCN, tax type 3 is additional tax.
May I know why the process not in OB40? I see only input and out tax in OB40.
Also what is the purpose of additional tax and how to post?
Thanks

Hi Eloy,
Read somthing on Retroactive Conditioins,, these are utilized to calculated values on backdated documents.
See if this helps.
Mohammed

Similar Messages

CA: Additional Tax infotype 462 and 463

Requirement is to capturing additional tax and taken from employee pay.
I want to know can I delimit the existing IT462 and IT463 and create a new IT462 and 463 for one pay period deduct additional tax (Fed and Provincial) and change the infotype back to original form after deducting addition tax (one time ) from employee pay.
Please let me know is there any implication of this workaround on future tax calculation or year end activities.
Or to divide capturing amount in 12 (Monthly pay period)and deduct from employee pay every month,
Please advise.
Thanks in advance

Hi Karthik,
Yes Few employees are from Quebec and few are from ontario.
I did delimit IT 462 and 463.
I can see additional fed and prvovincial tax in /306 and /356 and additional amount added in /302 and /352.
However instead of deducting from employee payement /559 it goest into claim /561.
And user wants to deduct it from /559. ( Employee has enough money to deduct additional fed and prov tax).
Please let me know what can I do or is it a normal process.
Thanks,

Additional tax calculated in PO

Dear Friends,
According to user sales tax rate for PO# 4111131887 should be 9%, however, for last invoice posted agains it, calculated sales tax rate was 13%. User is asking to explain where is the additional tax coming from.
Please suggest.
Regards
Sridhar

Hi,
Pleasae check the tax code in the PO and Invoice
Also check the FTXP for the tax code used.
Please give complete details.
Cheers,
Satish Purandare

Additional Tax on VAT Gujarat

Hi,
Gujarat Govt. is levying Addl.Tax 2.5% over VAT on purchases.How to create a seperate field in FTXP and capture the same seperately.
Pl. provvide us the config. details for creation of seperate field , as this needs to be shown seperately.
Prem

hi,
Please follow following steps to add additional VAT.
1. create a condition type- tcode obq1
2 Define transaction key - tcode obcn.
3 Create a gl account for additional vat - tcode fs00
4. define tax account- tcode ob40.
5 change tax procedure tcode - obq3.
6. create seperate tax code for gujarat only - tcode- FTXP
7. Maintain Condition records- T code - FV11.
Regards,
Vijay

Additional taxes in retail store?

If I buy a macpro in retail store, the price is the same that online? Or aditional taxes apply?

I took a look at Expercom but they have a confusing policy--it sounds like you have to buy something from their retail stores (in Utah) before being allowed to buy from them online. Seems really bizarre.
"Due to Apple's policies for authorized resellers, you must be a prior Expercom retail store customer to purchase Apple products online. If you are a prior customer, go ahead and sign in first before placing this item in your cart. If you are new to ExperCom and would like to visit us, call us."

Is there an IDOC like WPDTAX but instead of MWAS for MWAL (Additional Tax)?

This is requiered to update for an external software.

Hello,
Thanks for your response.
It was not supposed to be marked as correct answer, as there was no solution given on the thread.
Regards,
Amit

Medicare additional tax rate (.9%) for employees with wages over 200K

Has anyone successfully applied the necessary ESU's? It seems there has been a few ESU's regarding this issue and I would appreciate any insight that can be shared.
Thanks.

Hello,
Please log a service request and the specific scenario and we will review it.
Regards,
Elena

Additional Tax Negetive value

Dear Gurus
I have a Requirement that I have to match the Incometax with External System. so I had Created the wagetype by copeing the wagetype MVT0. I copied the PCR INVT also.
now when I enter negetive value more then the monthly Incomtax, it is giving me an error.
Please suggest.
Thanks and regards
Ankitv

Hi Sikindar
I have copied the PCR and copy the MVT1 with cusom WT and change in schema is also done.
I got this Error.
12/2012 ( 01.03.2013 - 31.03.2013 )      Regular payroll run in 12/2012
     INBTX INBT GEN NOAB IN01 Transfer Wage Type /470
         Processing
             Negative transfer amount for infotype
regards
Ankit v
Edited by: Ankit Vasavada on Feb 14, 2012 2:08 PM

Company code is not set up for electronic tax return

hi dear
what is the configuration of e-return salea/purchase .
The system cannot execute the taxes on sales/purchases settlement within electronic communication with authorities.
when i excute F.12 then message coming Company code is not set up for electronic tax return
please guide me.
regards
purushottam
Regards

Hi,
if you start report via SE38. program name RFUMSV00 you can read the program documentation. In here it states what is needed:
...In addition, the report provides data for the electronic advance return
for tax on sales/purchases. The administration report for electronic tax
returns (FOT_B2A_ADMIN) then directly sends the return to your relevant
tax authority.
To use the electronic advance return for tax on sales/purchases, make
the necessary settings in the screen area Posting Parameters under
Electronic Advance Tax Return.
For more information, see the SAP Library under Financials -> Financial
Accounting (FI) -> Financial Accounting General Topics -> Taxes
(FI-AP/AR) -> Taxes on Sales/Purchases, Sales Taxes, and Additional
Taxes -> Electronic Advance Return for Tax on Sales/Purchases.
Hope this gives you a beginning.
Hein

Error in Accounting Doc with 2 taxes

Dear Gurus,
My client
requirement is that they required 3 different taxes on pricing procedures of
Sales Order to Billing Document. One is
general sales tax i.e 17% (MWST) , other is income tax (ZIN) i.e 10%
and last one is Additional Tax i.e.1% (ZADT) . I have created condition
types ZIN and ZADT by copying MWST with same access sequence. Both Taxes ZIN
and ZADT should utilize automatically (Condition Record) in sales document instead of any manual
entry.
First I tested the scenario with Condition Type of MWST only and it runs successfully
till creation of accounting document. Later I am testing with condition record
with ZIN but at the time of accounting document following error is coming:
Tax code OG does not appear in any G/L account item
Message no. FF753
I have
searched all the relevant queries on SCN and following steps already done in
customization from my end:
Tax type ZIN is assigned on Tax calculation procedure TAXPK with
Account Key ZIT similarly as on Sales Pricing Procedure
Create Tax Processing ZIT at T Code :OBCN with Tax Type: Out Put Tax and Posting
Ind.:Separate line indicator
Create Tax Code :OG at Tcode :FTXP
and assign 10 in Tax Perc Rate with Tax Type :Income Tax ,Acct Key:ZIT
and Cond Type:ZIN
Assign Tax Code OG with relevant G/L on Tax Processing :ZIT at Tcode
:OB40
Assign Tax Category in relevant G/L as * (All Tax Types Allowed)
Kindly
guide which steps required rectification for proper execution of this process.
Looking
forward for your cooperation.

dear
the function of the sort key is that the setting done in the sort key will be there in the Assignment field in the accounting docuement.
the sort key is defined at the accoutn level in control tab and also at the customer master level in company code data.
if there is a mismatch between sort key defined at the customer master level and defined in the account level then system flashes this error.
u just remove the sort key from the customer master Company code data then try posting the documetr.
regards

Tax issue Res UT, Work IL

Hi Guys,
We are on SAP ECC 6.0 bsi 9.0a#31. EE with IT0207 as UT and IT0208 as IL is causing IL State tax instead of UT tax. There is no reciprocity between these states.
When I view the log at USTAX node -> processing second subnode Tax Data(which is before the third node BSI Interface) shows residence code as 1 for IL and 0 for UT for tax type 01.
Tax     Res. Tax   Receipt Formula
Code    Code Type Form     Number
FED      0      01               01
FED      0      03               01
FED      0      04               01
FED      0      05               01
FED      0      06               01
FED      0      10               01
IL          1      01               01
IL          1      10               01
UT        0      01               01
This is a new hire and master data is correct. IT0207 as UT and IT0208 as ILIT0210 has FED and UT.
Any comment is appreciated.
Thanks,
Gajanan

Hello Gajanan,
Kindly check whether you have maintained the Nexus indicator for Reciprocity for the states as mentioned in the WIKI document
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPHCM/BSITaxFactory9.0
Kindly check whether you have maintained in IMG --> Payroll USA --> Tax --> Tax Data Maintenance --> Tax Override --> Specify additional tax reciprocity attributes.
With Regards,
S.Karthik

MB11/MB1C/MB1B post GL entry for tax for movement type 561 initial stock

Hi,
We want to bring in stock into new system using movement type 561. The usual account posting is:
Debit stock
Credit account in OBYC GBB
How can I add additional tax posting in the transaction? For e.g.
Debit stock
Debit input tax
Credit account in OBYC GBB
I tried to open up the Tax Code in the movement type field status but it doesn't show up in any of MB11/MB1C/MB1B.
Any customized BAdI/user-exit for this?
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance for help!

hi,
you cant update the tax account directly using the 561 mov type.
please find below the link for more clarifications regarding the tax accounts.
http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2126200
Regards,
velu

Tax line items when travel expenses are posted to intercompany

Hello Experts,
We are posting a expense report to a different cost center other than the Master cost center(IT0001). In this case system understanding as intercompany transaction and posting the travel expenses to different cost center and different company code. But the problem is when there is a tax calcualted, this tax is initially getting posted to original master cost center and again transfering the taxes to the intercompany cost center. this is creating an additional FI documents and also additional tax line items which is becoming very difficult for reconcilation.
can any one suggest me where could be the correction required in order to post the taxes to intercompany cost center in the first instance itself.
Thanks&Regards
Srinivas

Hi Srinivas,
Profit center was not picking for tax line item when we were doing multiple cost center in a TRIP. So we have activated "not deductible" in VST and it got worked.
Later when we got a Cross company employee vendor posting, tax line items are posting in both company codes.
So we have deactivated "not deductible" in VST and activated "set expense company code" in table T706K (to allow cross company code postings in TM)
And defined a new solution in New GL config for the first prblem.
We have not changed anything in "posting indicator" in OBCN, it was 2 (Separate line item) only. You should not change this.
All postings went fine.
Regards
SM

Adding the tax condition type after customer pays

Hi,
I have a strange situation.
The customer has payed the invoice amount and evrything is cleared and the complete Order to Cash cycle is complete.
Now my client wants to charge the customer with the tax amount (implemented later) on the invoice that is already been cleared.And that amount should as usual go to the tax G/L account. There are not many Condiiton types but just the base price condition type and tax condition type.
I have maintained a necessary condition record for MWST.
SAP transaction wise I am thinking to create a normal sales order of the invoice amount (Base + Tax condition type) and then complete the order to cash cycle.And once it is completed I would create a debit memo request and subsequent debit memo for the base price which would be adjusted later.
This will solve my basic purpose of Tax amount goin to the tax account.
This is only for few SO in the production
Please let me know in case anyone has a better idea.

Hi ronaldo
You create a sales order with document type L2 ( debit process) . so you create the sales order with reference to billing . Now manually you enter the tax condition type (MWST) at the sales order level and then do billing.Make sure that in the tax condition type details you have maintained the option C "Manual entries are possible" .So that you can enter the the tax condition type manually at the sales order level.
So some additional taxes are being charged to the payer.So he will be paying some extra taxes as he has already paid for the billing document that has been passed to FI
Regards
Srinath

US: Tax-setup of Sales and Use Tax in a company located in Michigan, US

Dear all!
Below it's described how the A/P-taxes have to be handeld in our company in Michigan, US. We want to use a very simple TAXUS-setup (No Jurisdiction). Actually we have problem in setting up the tax-scheme of TAXUS with the following cases:
In the US, there are four situations for our Sales/Use Tax. All four are for A/P only. All four are related to the State of Michigan. The applicable tax rate is either 0% (exempt from tax) or 6% (taxable).
The first two involve invoices that are correct from the vendor and nothing special needs to be done. The
payment is made to the vendor and the full amount of the invoice is booked to the expense account (i.e. 123456 Telephone).
1. The vendor DOES NOT charge sales tax on items that are EXEMPT from sales tax.
2. The vendor DOES charge sales tax on items that are TAXABLE.
The second two situations involve invoices that are incorrect from the vendor and our company must account for the sales/use tax.
3. The vendor DOES NOT charge sales tax on items that are TAXABLE. Our company must accrue for the tax due to the State of Michigan and pay it at the end of the period.
4. The vendor DOES charge sales tax on items that are EXEMPT from sales tax. Our company must either deduct the sales tax on the invoice from the payment and reduce the amount paid to the vendor OR pay the invoice in full and book the overpayment of tax against the accruals from item #3.
Especially case #3 is actually the biggest challenge to be setup in the system in order to get the amounts correctly calculated. To our opinion the SAP has to create an additional tax-line item.
Thanks a lot for a helpful answer or solution!
Regards,
Bernd

Hi Bernd,
Did you get a solution for your query? If so, can you please share that? I have the same scenario for Geismar, Louisiana.
Please let me know how did you configure the Accrued tax. Really appreciate your response.
Thanks, Reji.

Additional tax

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for