Adjust quantity in order to actual value

Hi all,
During partial confirmation system is not calculating the activity quantities according to the partial yield quantities given...
when actual data tab is pressed the order quantity occurs and if the quantity is reduced the activity hours remains the same..but the components are calculated according to the partial values given
i have checked OPKP - Adjust quantity in order to actual value, OPK4 - actual data is there any other setting to get the hours of activity to be calculated when the partial quantities are given.
Regards,
Joseph.

Hi,
Also try OPK0 and OPK1 in the default tab under services "immediate Proposal".
hope may be useful..
Regards,
Ravi

Similar Messages

How to get Production Order wise Actual Values

Dear CO Experts,
How to get Actual Values (Raw Material Issue, Activity Confirmations & OH Calculations & Goods Receipts from Production) each Production Order wise ?
My Scenario is Product Cost Collectors (PCC) with Production Orders.
If we select above scenario Production Order is Statistical and PCC is real cost object.
For PCC is Period wise we can track the cost Periodically in individual Material.
But my client is asking how to see the each Production Order wise Actual values. Is there any T.Code ??
In Production Order I am able to see only Plan values (CO03).
Waiting for your favorable reply.
Regards,
KBR.

Hi Bhaskar
You are in Alaska and you wanna eat vegetarian food
You cant get values at Prod order level if you have chosen PCC as cost object.... You will only get Qty at Prod order level
To get a bird's eye view of costs incurred in PCC, execute report MCRY with PCC as the input... MCRX shows only Qty info for components
br, Ajay M

PolyFit functions - should it return up to order + 1 actual values?

I have been using the PolyFit function in CVI 2010 (version 10.0.0 (360)) and I am trying to figure out if I am implementing incorrectly, there is a bug for higher order or if I am getting the exepected behavior.
The function always return zero for coefficients above 26 (order equals between 45 to 90 ). I could understand this if the fit were always good but in cases where the fit is obviously less than optimum the first twenty seven coefficients (o through 26) are populated but the remainder never are. Is this an expected behavior?
The application is the removal of baseline roll / drift from mass spectrometry data. The file sizes are large (4 MPoint and up) which must be tackled in smaller chunks (at least currently). One may can correct misfit data by limiting the chunk size manaually but the end goal is routine, robust automation across multiple blind spectra.

In our case the baseline roll is relatively slow compared with the real signals. However, the correction using the current polyfit has an effective limit of 500 to 1500 Hz (chi by eye). This requires several regions to be fit and then the "joints" to be smoothed to cover the approxiamtely 1 MHz bandpass that we are looking for. Such a piecewise fit is doable but it requires a lot more knowledge of the system if the analysis is to be performed in batch mode (no human intervention.)
The main question of what should the return values be suggest that the function should be upward bounded to a value less than 90 (the current limit as described in the documentation and reported by the debugger ).

In a purchase order for 3 GR's Quantity does not equal the value

Hi,
I have found the difference in one purchase order, there have been 3 GRs where the Qty does not equal the Value. How has this happened?
Any guesses why the difference has come.
Thanks&regards,
Veena

Hi Vishal,
In po history for agt 3 Gr's Quantity does not equal the values. I hope the difference is Movement types. But exactly where to check this movements i am not getting.
Can you tell me this which T.code.
Tx,

Credit Note to be adjusted against sales order value

Hi Experts,
The scenario is as follows:
a. Customer is having credit note(balance) in SAP CRM
b. In subsequent order the credit note value to be adjusted against the order value
c. Customer is advance payment only
d. The sales order value to be calculated after deducting the credit note for order for payment

Hi Mukesh,
I think you want to adjust the value of the sales order based on the credit note issued to the customer or advance payment. The credit note will result in a AR posting and hence should not be used for adjusting the sale order value. That adjustment will happen in AR anyway.
The advance payment can be stored in a condition of the sales order and can be used for adjusting the sales order value basically to reduce the AR. You will have to manipulations in pricing to get the right AR, Revenue and Advance payment postings.
Let me know if you want more details as I am not 100% clear about your issue.
Thanks
Ashish

Service order/confitimation - plannedvalues/actual values or not flowing

Hi All,
When I am creating a Service contract in SAP CRM an internal order is created with planned values but when I am creating a service order/service confirmations and assigning it to a contract t the planned values/actual values are not flowing on to the internal order
Can you please let me if any specific configuration is missed or required for the above scenario?
Thanks
SK

closed

Actual values & Plan Values Entry in the same Input Ready Query

Hi Gurus,
I have a problem about preparing input ready queries with combination of actual data and plan data together. Forexample :
I want to plan my sales quantity for estimate months ( 9,10,11,12 ). But in same query, i want to show sales quantities in actual months (1.....8 ) . I have one key figure : Sales Quantity and two versions : Actual and Plan. And restrictions are like below :
Actual Sales :
Key figure : Sales Quantity
Version : Actual
Fiscal Periods : 9,10,11,12
Fiscal year : 2008
(values cannot be changed)
Plan Sales :
Key figure : Sales quantity
Version : Plan
Fiscal Periods : 1.....8
Fiscal Year : 2008
(values can be changed by inputs or planning functions)
I did those restrictions to key figures in ''columns'' area in BEX Query Designer. And i also added 0FISCPER3 to ''columns'' area in order to see periods in query.
I expect to see a 12 months period, which has 8 months actual and 4 months open for planning.
But when i execute the query, it shows me two 12 months periods. Like, Actual Sales 1......12 and following Plan Sales 1.....12 side by side. But i want to combine those two 12 months periods in one year.
Where do i make mistake? or is it how system works?
I would really appreciate for your answers.
Thanks,
Fatih...

Hi,
Actions in details:
1. Run BEx Analyzer, connect to the system;
2. Open the workbook;
3. Workbook is opened, press the button "Design Mode";
4. ALT+F11 for opening VB Editor;
5. Insert new module "Module1" in project of my workbook (not in BExAnalyzer.xla);
6. Write the code of macros "ON_BEX_REFRESH";
7. Close the VB Editor window;
8. BEx Analyzer window is still in design mode, press the button "Workbook Settings";
9. In "General" tab mark the checkbox "Refresh Workbook on Open";
10. In "Exits" tab mark the radiobutton "Invoke macro on refresh" and write "ON_BEX_REFRESH" in the textbox;
11. Press the button "Attach Macros", appears the message "VBA Macros have been succesfully Attached to the Workbook", press OK for accepting the message;
12. Press "OK" to close the Workbook Settings window;
13. Press the button "Exit Design Mode";
14. Click on right mouse button on table (on inserted query), choose "Transfer Values";
15. If macros is working, press "Save Workbook".
I'm using BEx Support Package 16. Therefore it is possible, if I remember correctly, that in older versions of BEx the names of some tabs in workbook settings are different.
If you are using older version of BEx and these 14 steps don't help you, then try to do the following in next steps:
15. Press the button "Design Mode";
16. Open Analysis Grid Properties (select table, click on right mouse button, properties);
17. In 'General' tab do so that none checkbox is marked;
18. Press OK;
19. Press the button "Exit Design Mode";
20. Click on right mouse button on table (on inserted query), choose "Transfer Values";
If now macros is working then you can start to find out which checkboxes you can mark and which have to be unmarked in Analysis Grid Properties.
In my case 3 checkboxes is marked: "Apply Formatting"; "Allow Navigation"; "Display Hierarchy Icons". As I mentioned above it is in BEx SP16, if you have older version then you have to find out the checkboxes which you can use, which not.
Regards,
Ainars

In report painter GRR3 1VK Actual Value picked up from previous year

Dear Experts,
In report painter GRR3 > 1VK
1. Column of Actual Quantity to take in Basic Key Figure from Statistical Quantity
2. The value is 4 (Actual) and Version is 0
I found that the Actual value appeared are actually taken from the previous fiscal year. I have checked the line items and their document posting date it shown as last fiscal year.
In this case, where should I amend to have the report pick up only actual value of this fiscal year? or Is there any value to maintain for GRR3 to pickup the current fiscal year actual posting?
Thank you very much and Best Regards,
Anne

hi..
Goto GRR3 > click on Lib 1VK it will show you all the report in 1VK library > select your report & double click on it
It will display the report format. Then go to Edit at the top. you will find General data selection.click on it you will find available characteristics. Then goto GRR2 for making any change/selection for Fiscal year char
If your report is a standard one you can not change. then copy the report from GRR1 and make the changes.
You can also see the char in GR23 by selecting 1VK lib.
kkumar
Edited by: kkbdsp on Mar 11, 2011 9:21 AM

Standard report for leading prod. order with variance value & qty.

Hi Gurus,
I am searching for a standard Tcode to get the variance value/Qty against all the leading production orders which are settled in a particular period.
Note: If a leading production order contains more than one sub orders then the qunatity of sub orders should merge with the leaing order and all the variance from individual sub orders should also merge with the leading production order.
Please suggest the tables and fileds are used for storing the leading and non leading production order and its corresponding Planned/Actual and Variance values.
Please guide me.
Regards,
Ramakant.

Hi,
Thanks for your early response.
Actually i am unable to use tcode: KKBC_ORD rather able to use KKBC only.
Using KKBC (Target/actual/production variance) and activating collective order from setting option only able to see the details for a particular leading production order only relating toa particular period .
My requirement is to display all the production orders settled in a particular period along with (Material code /order number/ Qty/Actual value and variance value).
Note: If any leading order exists then that should be collective order i.e.(value and Qty should come against the leading order number).
If there is any standard tcode exists please let me know else provide the tables and logic to bui;d up such a report.
Regards,
Ramakanta

Tables related to PM order for actual and commitment items

Hello Experts,
I need help in finding the tables related to PM order for actual and commitment items.
I need develop a report which can show the actual and commitment items for each order and Operation/component under that each ITEM wise and its related documents.
For the component we can find the table RESB.
But i am getting the difficult to find the data related to Operation (services)
In my client we can able to see PM orders with activity types and SKF
How can build the logic to find the values for each operation item and its commitments (PO, PR) and actual that is FI documents
Please guide me the TABLES and fields or else give me the hints, how can find the tables
Thanks and Regards,
Narendra

Hi,
The tables are COEP (actuals) and COOI (commitments); that is if you mean the financial figures.
Regards,
Eli

Sales orders Dispatch Actual No of pipes do not match with R3 report

Dear Gurus,
Looking Ur assistance for an issue.
Issue: For some of the sales orders Dispatch Actual No of pipes do not match with R3 report. Actual No of Pipes matches with LIKP table values in R3. Query needs to be modified to restrict records as per logic in WGSRLDES report/program.
Can U help me in this Regard.
Ur Responses are most appreciated.

Hey Pathak,
The problem is, BI report is matching with the datails with R/3 LIKP table. But the business user is using Report WGSRLDES report/program, where the data is missmatching.
Hope U got my Point.

Problem in Commitment and actual value..

Dear Experts,
I am facing a problem in 533 report. i created many purchase orders for a project X. In me2j report all po's are showing but in 533 report for X project commitment values are not coming.
i also created GRN for some PO's but actual values are also not coming....
in our business scenario we are creating PR's thru network. upper problem is coming when we are taking item category L in PR's...
please give me solution step by step..
***its urgent******
regards

dear Jaun,
we are creating PR thru n/w with item category L.we take 3rd party PR. we are not using MRP and BOM procedure. PR's value comes in commitment column in 533 report. but when we are converting these prs in PO in 533 report commitment column values are not coming. this is my problem.
when we take item category N all things are ok.
but users already created many Prs and POs with item category L so i want to know that is there any possibility to come po value in commitment that created thru reference of PR with item category L? (in these PO accnt assg. cat. is Q.)
help me.

Actual Value displayed in GRR3 report painter Library 1VK

Dear Experts,
In report painter GRR3 > 1VK
I have summarized the Consumption according to Cost Centre of each activity types, I have set;
1. Column of Actual Quantity to take in Basic Key Figure from Statistical Quantity
2. The value is 4 (Actual) and Version is 0
Once I run the GRR3 report, there is some figure in that particular column and does not know where to trace the origin of those value. This actual figure appears on current period onwards where actual data does not been distributed on the system yet.
Kindly advice.
Best Regards,
Anne

Dear Ajay,
Im so happy right now I found that the Actual value appeared are actually taken from the previous fiscal year. I have checked the line items and their document posting date it shown as last fiscal year.
In this case, where should I amend to have the report pick up only actual value of this fiscal year?
Thank you very much Ajay
Best Regards,
Anne

Change in Purchase Order Release Strategy Values

Dear All,
I am in process of changing Purchase Order release strategy values.
I have following release strategy -
                       Current Value                  (Proposed Value)
Level 1 -         Upto INR 0.1 Mn               (Proposed value - Upto 1.0 Mn)
Level 2 -         From 0.11 Mn to 0.5 Mn   (Proposed Value - From 1.01 Mn to 5.00 Mn)
Level 3 -         From 0.51 Mn to 1.0 Mn   (Proposed Value - From 5.01 Mn to 10.0 Mn)
Level 4 -         Above 1.0 Mn                  (Proposed Value - Above 10.0 Mn)
My questions are -
1) Will this change affect the existing Purchase Orders (already created) which are not yet released?
2) Will this change affect the existing Purchase Orders (already created) which are released?
3) Are there any risk factors?
Can you pl. put light on above questions?
Regards,
Prashant Kolhatkar

Hi,
Actually, what you had given is not enough to determine if the existing PO will be impacted or not
If you are just changing the classification but not changing the number of release level of the release code in the release strategy, the partial released PO will not be impacted unless there's PO changes. PO that are released will definitely not be impacted unless there are changed.
In general, after a release strategy is determined for PO, SAP will retrieve the latest list of release code of that release strategy for display for that PO. If this list never change (mean you only change classification of the release strategy), then they will not be apparent to the user. But if this list change (you add new release code, replace existing release code or remove release code), then you will see some discrepency on screen as you will only see the modified list of release code and not the old list of release code
Hope this help

Lot quantity to order for a material set as reorder point planning

Dear All,
Suppose the requirements of a material are as follows:
Week1 Required quantity - 100
Week2 required quantity - 150
Week3 required quantity - 300
Week4 required quantity - 500
This material is set as "VB" (Reorder point planning in the material master)
My questions is:
Can we use periodic lot sizing procedure for a material planned based on reorder point planning , so that MRP run will consider the requirements of a month (1050) and use that as the lot size to order material.
We want to plan the material if it falls below the reorder level, but we want the system to dynamically calculate the quantity to order based on the actual demand (and not on either fixed lot size or maxmimum stock level).
with regrds
Laxmipathi.G.V

Hi
Use Anyone of the following
1. Use automatic reorder point with forecast planning requirment.Where ssytem will calculate reorder point automatically based on weekly /monthly Forecast req.In this case Lot size you can use EX itself.
2. Use Planning type PD and lot size EX and Instaed of ROL use safety stock so that system will consider weekly sale req. and also safety stock according to that procerement proposal will be created.
Regards,
Velmurugan S

Adjust quantity in order to actual value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for