Adobe CC Application Maxes out Network Capacity

Hi,
We are deploying the Creative Cloud applications to around 150 Mac OS users, and are having some very bad network issues when we attempt to update more than one person at a time.
Basically, we have a 100M pipe, and we're seeing it MAX OUT COMPLETELY when we have 2 or 3 users connect to the CC App and download the equivalent of the old Design Standard Package (Illustrator, Photoshop, InDesign, Acrobat and Bridge).
With 1 person downloading, it creates a significant load on the network. With more than one person, it maxes out. It even has a negative impact when running the minor application updates at this point.
Very disturbing... Is anyone else seeing anything like this?

If I was just one person, downloading once, of course downloading and installing as fast as possible would be great- in fact, personally, I've been singing the praises of CC because of this.
But when I am responsible for 150 people, who represent less than 1/3rd of my company overall, and attempting to download ~3GB of data for 3 people at once literally kills transfer rates for nearly everyone else on our network... Then yes, if it must take longer, then I want it to take longer.
Before I rant a little further, and provide some context, I'd like to admit that this may be our network. I don't know for sure.
So if anyone else is seeing performance like this, it would be nice to get some general evidence showing where the problem may lie.
RANT:
I want the download process to be refined, and even graceful. I want Adobe to not ignore examples that exist in the real world from companies that understand this kind of download interaction. When I pull a game off of Steam, probably the very best cloud-based software distribution example available, I don't kick my roommates (or even my office mates) OFF of the internet almost entirely.
Dollars to donuts, I could set up 5 iMacs in my office, install the Steam Client, and tell it to download Borderlands 2, which, if I recall correctly, is about a 2.5GB game. I'll bet that it will finish rather quickly- probably 20-30 minutes with our connection here- for EACH machine, RUNNING SIMULTANEOUSLY. Everyone else will be able to continue to utilize the network at their own pace, with no iterruption.
Why is this not the case for the Creative Cloud?
If it's not the fault of our network... I will only accept one answer: It's new, and Adobe is still learning how to handle this. I've already granted that for the few small bugs I've seen in the CC app, and the fact that the Files functionality is not available, nor are Fonts.
END RANT.

Similar Messages

  • Processor maxed out when starting RT application in development mode.

    When I go to run my RT application on my 8145RT board in development mode, one of my dual-core processors stays maxed out for 2 or 3 minutes.  I added a break-point at the very begining of the code to make sure it was not something related to the execution of my code.  This only happens if I make a change to the code and have to re-download it.
    I am using LabVIEW 2009.
    Any ideas?

    I know this behaviour and I think (but I'm not sure) its a bug which is allready reported. Right now I'm out of office and cannot access the DB to check the CARs number, but as soon as I'm back I will check and update you here.
    Christian

  • Capacity maxed out on ipad after updating to iOS6

    capacity maxed out as "Other" on ipad after updating to iOS6.  How do I fix?

    You can try this, but it appears as though the download went bad and you might very well have to restore your iPad to get rid of the "Other",
    Reboot the iPad by holding down on the sleep and home buttons at the same time for about 10-15 seconds until the Apple Logo appears - ignore the red slider - let go of the buttons.
    "Other" consist of non media content .... App documents and files, contacts, calendar entries, Safari bookmarks and history, notes, email messages and so on. It should not be bloating your iPad storage.

  • Deployment of an Adobe AIR application in an enterprise environment

    Dear Team members,
    first of all my apologies for posting this thread in more than one forum (see Installations Issues) but the argument is very important to us and I don't know where discuss it.
    I would like to post a question to you regarding deployment doubts that we are trying to address.
    My company is working on the new version of our primary application previously built as a J2EE application with some reporting functions with Flex, and we want to use AIR in order to leverage its possibilities:
    Seamless integration with existing application functionalities (implemented as standard JEE web application pages) thanks to the integrated HTML capabilities
    Improved integration of the user interface with the desktop
    Native processes to provide additional functionalities
    Our application is targeted to pharmaceutical industry, subject to FDA regulations, and it affects more than 5000 users for each customer, so we have some specific requirements affecting the deployment and distribution of the software:
    Allow to run multiple versions of the software on the same client machine (to support test and acceptance activities in addition to the production environment)
    Minimize the effort of the initial setup on each client
    Manage the version upgrades without manual activities on each client
    Keep the test/acceptance and production environments strictly aligned to improve effectiveness of formal validation (ideally, an application once validated should be transported in production without any source code modification, recompilation or repackaging)
    The current browser-based strategy is perfectly fit to these requirements, and in the shift towards a desktop-based strategy we need to continue satisfying them as much as possible. We evaluated the standard distribution strategy of Adobe AIR applications, and noticed several attention points in this scenario.
    The first issue we encountered is the back-end services endpoint discovery problem. Simply hardcoding a server URL in the packaged application could be a viable solution for public internet-accessible applications, but we need to support multiple customers in their intranet, and each one typically requires multiple environments for the application (acceptance, production, etc.). Maintaining dozens of different packages of the AIR application to support all these customer environments clearly is not the solution. Neither we want to force thousands of different users to enter and maintain the correct server location in their local preferences.
    So, we thought to use a badge hosted in the back-end application to run the local AIR application: using the underlying API, we could activate the application specifying also the network location of the back-end services. We could also rely on the badge to install the application (and the AIR runtime if necessary)… however, application packaged as native installers cannot be installed, upgraded, or launched by the badge API (and we need to package ours as native to use native processes).
    We also noticed that multiple versions of an AIR application cannot be installed side-by-side in a client machine, and that the installation and upgrade of the application can be performed only when the local user has administrative rights on the machine (using standard or native packages), forcing us to rely on external software distribution systems in some customer scenarios (introducing additional complexities in the release cycle).
    At this point, in our opinion the standard deployment strategies of Adobe AIR applications are unfit for enterprise environments. In the enterprise world, many of the applications have migrated to a completely browser-based solution, while others enhanced their client layer to comply with the requirements, for example installing only a thin portion of the client code and allowing to connect to multiple server versions/environments with it (e.g. the SAP GUI universal client). Without smarter deployment and distribution tools, AIR applications currently are a step back compared to web applications in terms of manageability.
    So, we are trying to develop a solution to address these problems, with some concepts similar to JStart: install on the client machine a launcher application capable of being activated from a web page, dynamically locate, download and run the actual client bytecode, transparently enforce client software updates, and supporting multiple applications (and multiple versions of the same application). However, we are facing many technical problems due to internal architecture of AIR and we already spent a considerable amount of effort trying to find a solution. We are now thinking to return on the choice of AIR, going back to Flex.
    What is the position of Adobe on this argument? Is Adobe aware of these issues and are there any plans on this topic? Any advice?
    Thank you in advance

    For those following along, Oliver Goldman will be answering this post in future articles on his blog.
    Many great comments and questions here. I’m working on some follow-up posts to address these; nothing I could cram into this comment field would really do your query justice. - Oliver Goldman
    Pursuit of Simplicity
    Chris

  • My hard drive is about maxed out, what are my options

    I have a MacBook that is about 5 years old.  My hard drive is about maxed out.  Trying to determine if it is worth trying to get a larger hard drive, whether I just go to a portable hard drive (a bit of a pain since I travel so much) or something else.  Don't think I can even upgrade to Mountain Lion because of lack of hard drive space.  I love my Mac, but am looking at possibly going to an iPad for travel as the Mac is heavy and I have to carry two computers (work and personal).  Considered buying a new Mac, say an Air, but don't have that kind of cash to drop for it. 
    Would appreciate any opinions out there?  If I upgrade the hard drive, what kind of money are we talking about?
    PeterH

    For a new hard drive try Newegg.com http://www.newegg.com/Store/SubCategory.aspx?SubCategory=380&name=Laptop-Hard-Dr ives&Order=PRICE
    Or OWC for regular hard drives and SSDs  http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/hard-drives/2.5-Notebook/
    Here are instructions on replacing the hard drive in a MacBook with a removable battery. http://creativemac.digitalmedianet.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=45088
    To transfer your current hard drive I like the free application SuperDuper. It makes a bootable copy of everything on your hard drive http://www.shirt-pocket.com/SuperDuper/SuperDuperDescription.html You'll need a cheap SATA external hard drive case. Put the new drive in the case then format and partition the new drive and clone your old drive to the new one. Check that it's set up right by booting up from the external drive. Then replace your old hard drive with the new one and put your old one in the external case.
    Here's a cheap SATA external hard drive case on Amazon http://www.amazon.com/Vantec-NexStar-2-5-Inch-External-Enclosure/dp/B002JQNXZC/r ef=pd_cp_pc_0
    If you don’t have the tools to open up the MacBook OWC has a set for $5
    http://eshop.macsales.com/item/OWC/TOOLKITMHD/

  • Adobe Air Application Installer.exe Documentation

    Hello All,
    i am having severe problems retrieving the documentation for "Adobe Air Application Installer.exe"
    We have applied as Publisher for Air Apps here:
    http://www.adobe.com/products/air/runtime_distribution1.html
    and filled out the form
    http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=air_distribution2
    After that we were hoping to receive documentation about seamless install of air applications, but we are waiting right now ...
    So, time is running out, and i need the documentation of the "Adobe Air App Installer.exe"
    So far i have managed to silently install an air app:
    '$1 -silent -programMenu -location "$INSTDIR" "$TEMP\AirApp.air"' $0
    Where $1 is the "Adobe Air Installer.exe" retrieved from the registry
    $INSTDIR is the installation target path
    $TEMP is a temporary folder, containing the to install Air Application
    the above command works fine for clean and empty systems with no prior versions of the application installed.
    what i now miss are the return code meanings, ranging from 0..9 where i only know that 0 means success !
    And i would like to have a documentation about the
    -update
    and the
    -uninstall
    parameters for seamless installation/deinstallation of a whole air app with data

    hi there,
    i got the documentation also, dunno why they make it so hard
    to get it
    thank you very much !
    greets from joymoney
    ck
    I was also facing this problem.
    Today I got this
    http://help.adobe.com/en_US/AIR/1.5/air_runtime_redist/air_runtime_redist.pdf
    http://help.adobe.com/en_US/AIR/1.5/air_runtime_redist/air_runtime_redist.pdf

  • Error U44M1I210 - None of the NEW Mac's can install the latest updates Adobe CC is pushing out.

    Here is the problem:
    I have 3 new Macs (iMac, MacBookPro, Mac Pro trash can)
    All 3 do have adobe CC installed with programs working at the moment.
    However with the most recent updates to Premiere, AE, Photoshop and Media Encoder that Adobe CC is pushing out, none of the computers can update to them.
    Receiving Error code U44M1I210
    Here is a system spec:
    For the Mac Pro, OSX 10.9.3 - 64GB Ram - 2.7GHz 12-core Xeon E5
    What I have tried:
    I have tried to do the updates from work, over wireless, and wired.
    From Home wireless.
    And from a Hotel wireless.
    Older MacPros running CC but limited to CS6 Apps only, DO update over the same network as the Mac's that can not.
    Strange? yes!
    Why I think Adobe has made some type of coding mistake with New Apple Products:
    All 3 computers could not install these recent updates, but could install CC originally (about a month prior to the updates), and made made other small updates prior to this as well.
    The various locations I have tried to connect from have all failed, so I doubt it is a firewall issue.
    Adobe's Help line, had took control of my Mac Pro for about 2 hrs and could not figure out why it would not update.
    They uninstalled, reinstalled, the works...
    The issues has now been in limbo for a week.
    Will I ever be able to make an update to CC on any of my machines?
    Since we are paying a lot of money for Adobe's services, and have paid a lot of money for these new computers, that is my question. 
    Thanks

    Thanks Jeff,
    However when the Adobe tech support person took control of my Mac Pro, this was one of the processes they tried that failed to produce results.
    They reviewed the log files as well.
    The downloads would fail after they reached 50%.
    What does seem to be working for me, at least for Premiere and Media Encoder is manually installing the updates from this site:
    All Adobe CC 2014 Updates: The Direct Download Links for Mac OS | ProDesignTools

  • Storage Spaces: Virtual Disk taken offline during file copy, marked as "This disk is offline because it is out of capacity", but plenty of free space

    Server 2012 RC. I'm using Storage Spaces, with two virtual disks across 23 underlying physical disks.
    * First virtual disk is fixed provisioning, parity across 23 physical disks: 10,024GB capacity
    * Second virtual disk is fixed provisioning, parity across the remaining space on 6 of the same physical disks: 652GB capacity
    These have been configured as dynamic disks, with an NTFS volume spanned across the two (larger virtual disk first). Total volume size 10,676GB. For more details of the hardware, and why the configuration is like this, see: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserver8gen/thread/c35ff156-01a8-456a-9190-04c7bcfc048e
    I'm copying several TB from a network share to this volume. It is very slow at ~12MB/sec, but works. However, three times so far, several hours in to the file copy and with plenty of free space remaining, the 10,024GB virtual disk is suddenly taken offline.
    This obviously then fails the spanned volume and stops the file copy.
    The second time, I took screenshots, below. The disk (Disk27) is marked offline due to "This disk is offline because it is out of capacity". And the disk in the spanned volume is marked as missing (which is what you would expect when one of its member disks
    is offline).
    I can then mark the disk (Disk27) back online again, and this restores the spanned volume. I can then re-start the file copy from where it failed. There doesn't appear to be any data loss, but it does cause an outage that requires manual attention. As you
    can see, there is plenty of space left on the spanned volume.
    Each time this has happened, there are a few event 150 errors in the System event log: "Disk 27 has reached a logical block provisioning permanent resource exhaustion condition.". Source: Disk.
    - <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
    - <System>
      <Provider Name="disk" /> 
      <EventID Qualifiers="49156">150</EventID> 
      <Level>2</Level> 
      <Task>0</Task> 
      <Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords> 
      <TimeCreated SystemTime="2012-06-07T11:24:53.572101500Z" /> 
      <EventRecordID>14476</EventRecordID> 
      <Channel>System</Channel> 
      <Computer>Trounce-Server2.trounce.corp</Computer> 
      <Security /> 
      </System>
    - <EventData>
      <Data>\Device\Harddisk27\DR27</Data> 
      <Data>27</Data> 
      <Binary>000000000200300000000000960004C0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000</Binary> 
      </EventData>
      </Event>
    This error seems to be related to thin provisioning of disks. I found this:
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/hh848068(v=vs.85).aspx. But both these Virtual Disks are configured as Fixed, not Thin provisioning, so it shouldn't apply.
    My thoughts: the virtual disk should not spuriously go offline during a file copy, even if it was out of space. And in any case, there is plenty of free space remaining. Also, I don't understand the reason for why it is marked as offline ("This disk is offline
    because it is out of capacity"). Why would a disk go offline because it was out of thin capacity, rather than just returning an "out of disk space" error while keeping it online.

    Interesting Thread, I've been having the same issue. I had a failed hardware RAID that was impossible to recover in place, so after being forced to do a 1:1 backup, I find myself with 5 2TB hard drives to play with. Storage Spaces seemed like an interesting
    way to go until I started facing the issues we share.
    So my configuration is A VM Running Windows Server 2012 RC with 5 Virtualized Physical drives using a SCSI interface, 2TB in size that make up my storage pool. A Single Thinly provisioned Disk of 18 TB (using 1 disk for parity)
    Interestly enough, write speed has not been an issue on this machine (30~70MB/s, up from 256k on the beta) 
    Of note to me is this error in my event log 13 minutes before the drive disappeared:
    "The shadow copies of volume E: were deleted because the shadow copy storage could not grow in time.Consider reducing the IO load on the system or choose a shadow copy storage volume that is not being shadow copied."Source: volsnap, Event ID: 25, Level: Error
    followed by:
    "The system failed to flush data to the transaction log. Corruption may occur in VolumeId: E:, DeviceName: \Device\HarddiskVolume17.(The physical resources of  this disk have been exhausted.)"Source: Ntfs (Microsoft-Windows-Ntfs), Event ID: 140, Level: Warning
    I figure the amount of space available to me before I start encountering physical limits is in the vicinity of about 7TB. It dropped out for the second time at 184 GB.
    FYI, the number of columns created for me is 5
    Regards,
    Steven Blom

  • Lightroom 3 - The worst program Adobe has ever put out...

    If anyone cares to read this, I will be the first to say DO NOT UPGRADE!!
    I am spreading the word - facebook, word of mouth, every professional photographer in LA I know, blogs, etc. 
    You gotta raise hell to get changes.
    Lets see if Adobe will do anything about these issues...
    I thought that Adobe created "beta" for a reason - to smooth out all the kinks before they put the disk out. Nope. 
    I have been waiting for them to put out updates on many issues since I purchased the disk a month ago.... Still waiting Adobe!!!
    It is excruciating to watch my photos take literally 4-5 minutes to open.  Even worse, is the time it takes to save from Photoshop CS5 back to Lightroom - I timed 14min. FOR A PHOTO!
    I feel like the old days when I rendered video - went out to get a coffee, and came back to find the spinning of wheel of death still spinning.
    Oh, and I got to talk to India today too! for 3.5 hours - with no resolution to my problems. 
    Susheel accessed my computer remotely  - saw my catalog - sees 73,000 images, and asks "are you a photographer?"  REALLY?!  DId you REALLY just ask me that Susheel??
    Why I HATE Lightroom 3 - let me count the ways:
    1. Adobe closed their tech support in Portland (whom I have spoken to many times, and ALWAYS got my problems resolved.  They always went above & beyond the protocol - and we sit here and wonder why the US economy is crashing), now you get a no-name person in India or in the philippines (who have no extension, no email, not even a direct line so when you sit on a call for 3.5 hours and need to call back you are starting all over again.. Dear Adobe - do we live in 1980?? You are suppose to be a LEADER in technology. 
         I am morally against outsourcing, my artwork is all about the death of american industrial capitalism.  In a time when the US is in crisis, Adobe works on moving things out of the US.  I'm outraged - You can't get someone in the US EVEN IF YOU TRIED!  The best I could do was talk to someone in sales about this - wow. What does that say - American's "look good and sound good to sell our product, but when it comes to something advanced in technology like using the product and trouble shooting, we prefer to use someone with no extension in another country"
    2. They don't offer support for anyone who is running off a network (they expect professionals to be working off their local "c" drive or Mac internal hard drive.  HA!! 
    3. They continued to blame my network - even though my network is running smoothly, has no limitations on access, will open directly into photoshop just fine (and quick!), worked absolutely perfectly in Lightroom 2.... Yeah, it's the network, riiight.
    4. Lightroom 3 is corrupting files when opening into Photoshop CS5 - if I'm lucky enough to open them
    5. When I do get a photograph open, it loses it's filters once saved back into Lightroom (I rate my photos to help me navigate through the masses) - this really is hurting my workflow. When I shoot 800 images in the studio in one day - I DO NOT want to go back and fish around to find the edited version that lost its flag...
    6. I have been promised to get a phone call "sometime next week" since there is no extension I can call back on to move forward.  I'll keep you updated - let you know if Susheel keeps his word.  He couldn't tell me who was going to call me, or when, but he "assures" me it will happen.
         I wont hold my breath

    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    Keith_Reeder wrote:
    ambienttroutmask wrote:
    So the worst programme Adobe ever put out, yet even though you can have a 30 day trial you still went out and brought it...
    Yep, everything is always someone else's fault. It's never because they've made a stupid decision to buy before making absolutely sure that the software will work for them.
    Seems like nobody is prepared to take responsibility for their own actions these days.
    So, by that logic Adobe does not have to take ANY responsibility for pushing this kludge out the door?  Given they had a RC ready almost INSTANTLY after release should be sufficient to show they KNEW they were pushing garbage out the door.  Adobe is indeed responsible for their offering a know buggy product, bugs which CROSS PLATFORMS so it has to be the core code design not the user hardware or anything a given user has done.  Sure some systems might have setups which help make these issues more apparent, but that is on Adobe to deal with as they should publish limitations and known configurations which can potentially induce greater problems...but these entail an admission and accepting responsibility for the original buggy release...btw, release notes used to be where one would find quirks info and how to work around them post system requirements being carved in stone and set to entice the lowest common denomonator user.
    One more thing...LR is marketed not as a PRO TOOL, it is sold as a tool for the average to hobby level photographer.  That is also has huge appeal to the pro market is a happy accidentally-on-purpose thing...but to berate people who don't feel it's their job to troubleshoot a commercial app is completely unreasonable...but anymore the US consumer is the largest beta tester group on the planet...I wonder how our EU counterparts are fairing as ironically, they have stronger consumer protection laws...try pushing a crap product out in the German market...heh-heh, yeah good luck with that.
    Actually I would say this is not the worst software Adobe has ever pushed out the door but perhaps the worst photography software they ever sent as RTM.  Many, many PDF related apps and utils have actually been worse and we won't get into what they have done to Flash and Dreamweaver after that acquisition.  The closest analog I can see if that of what happened to Norton products post Norton being purchased by Symmantec.
    However, I am willing to give Adobe time to address this because they did have the RC ready almost right away.  Should they have done this?  No way, but perhaps the marketing wonks put the company in the position where it had to meet the release date even if issues were discovered and fixes in the pipeline already and it was gonna be a 3-9 week delay before the issues were mostly fixed.  But they did and well, even those who ran the beta, ran the 30-day trial did not find the issues because they simply did not use that part of the program enough for the bugs to manifest their effects to the degree when you the user, realize something odd is happening.
    I too am pissed, beyond belief as I depend on LR for my business, I can, however work around it for a while but I don't make money as a photographer I use photography for my business so the issues, while causing huge levels of frustration, are not fatal....yet...all I know is I don't want to revert to LR2.7 because I have done so much work onLR3/ LR3.2RC already and the tools themselves are indeed superior in LR3.x....when they work and that is the rub.  So many here are telling those with these bugs affecting their income/workflow bought into this to save time and leverage the bestter NR/sharpening and I say much improved adjustment tools.  I don't use the lense profiles at all really so nothing special for me there.
    I would ask a question...I am sure this has been asked and answered but, eh, why not one more time because search is sooooo "haaaard"
    but does this issue affect all file types?  I am shooting DNG but can switch to PEF if needed and convert on import but would rather just shoot DNG.  I am not willing to switch to JPG because if I have to do this I give up too much control on my images, for that I would switch back to LR2.7.
    Also, what versions of Camera RAW were used in the beta and what versions are being used with LR3.  I know I did upgrade to ACR6.2(?) or whatever the most current version.  I understand there are a ton of factors at play in these bugs but I do doubt it's ACR as my old antique PS CS3 version of Photoshop does not have any problems, of course it's using the old version of ACR 4.6(?) again sorry I forget what version exactly but it's trivial and can be determined.
    I like LR because I don't need the advanced features of PS all that often, still PS is a fun tool to have as a backup for the complicated shots though I don't have time to really spend in it as I would like to...
    But in general I guess I am trying to say, Adobe had to know in advance of the RTM original LR3 because they had the RC ready almost instantly.  Of course past releases of LR also had the same experience just the bugs were, well, not as impactful I suppose.  I have been happy with LR since 1.x versions but this version is painful to support...and I as I previously posted I won't screw with Adobe's refund people, likely off-shored staff who get bonuses for talking customers OUT of getting a refund, I will simply file a chargeback with Mastercard...that is why I use it, so I don't have to let companies waste my time wading through their red-tape.  And btw, Adobe knows the customer will WIN any chargeback because this evidence of a known to be defective product was sold to the consumer and the customer even allowed the mfg to remediate the issue only they failed to deliver in a timely fashion.  So, if one is not happy just "go to the mattresses"...use the chargeback hammer.  The bonus is every chargeback granted to the consumer costs the retailer, Adobe in my case, $35 when they lose...

  • Anyone know why Adobe X & Adobe XI Crashes my shared network printer driver when printing a PDF

    Anyone know why Adobe X & Adobe XI Crashes my shared network printer driver when printing on a domain, this only happens when I print a PDF.
    I then have to restart the print spooler to get my printouts sent to the printer. I am using a Windows 7 32 & 64 bit environment on a domain. Users who aren't on the domain experience no issues and their printer drivers remain online and not grayed out.
    When I print a PDF using Foxit Reader or Nitro PDF then all works fine, the moment I open a PDF using Adobe Reader X or XI then the shared network printer driver bombs out and I am back restarting the print spooler. If we roll back to Adobe 9 then we dont have any issues.
    When you create a local printer driver all works fine, the problem is we don't encourage local printer drivers due to security.
    We use Ricoh printer drivers, the MPC5501 PCL5C, driver version 1.2.0.0 with PDK version 12.65. We have also tried the PCL6 printer driver and Universal printer driver. All give the same result. The printer uses Winiprint Print processor using RAW as the default data type.
    We have contacted Adobe Global Support who advised that they cannot assist with this query as this is on a Domain environment and we have to contact our IT Department.
    We would really appreciate some professional help here to get a fix for this issue in order to address potential future occurance's

    Try to turn off any video acceleration on your graphic driver for your graphics card.

  • Web gallery max out at 500 images

    Hi, I'm using LR 3.5 and when I creat a web gallery it maxes out at 500 images, even though there are 776 photos in the gallery and all 776 are selected. In fact, the image number below the preview shows 1/500 instead of 1/776. When i look at the uploaded website it also only shows 500 images. In Library mode I see all 776 images, and also in Web mode I see all 776. When I switch from Library to Web I see the "Update Web Gallery" in the top left corner of the window. It shows the progress window: "Export image fliename-001" and continues up to image 500, then stops. So it appears it is only exporting 500 images.
    Thanks in advance for any help.

    Hopefully you appreciated I was being semi serious! Many pros would see part of their job being to whittle a big shoot down to a reasonable number to present to the client, and secondly I'd question if going through a slideshow in sequential order is the best way to review a large number of pictures - better than a grid of decent-sized thumbnails? Those are obviously judgement calls and I don't like a 500 limit being imposed.
    Now, to make your updated version survive Lightroom updates:
    Copy the Flash gallery's folder
    Paste it into Win C:\Users\john\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\Lightroom\Web Galleries or Mac Users\john\Library\Adobe\Lightroom\Web Galleries
    In galleryinfo.lrweb, change the ID - just add your initials
    In galleryinfo.lrweb, change the title to something like "Flash Gallery (edited)"
    When you restart LR, you'll see "Flash Gallery (edited)" in the Layout Style panel
    John

  • After upgrading to Lion my white MacBook I can't launch Adobe CS4 Applications. Please help!

    Everytime I try launching an Adobe CS4 application (Photoshop, Illustrator, watever...) I keep getting this kind of message, more or less:
    "To open [Photoshop] CS4 you should install a Java executed environment, but you are not connected to the internet"
    And I am! Why can't I run any of those applications? Can anyone please help me?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hello Carolyn, thank you for your help.
    I tried what they recommend on the Adobe pages, but the problem seems to be that the internet connection is not being detected.
    I tried opening Java Preferences and a similar window appeared saying a Java environment is needed but I am not connected to the internet - but obviously I am.
    As soon as I can solve this problem I will try what you recommend.
    Can you please help me with the connection issue? As you may see, the window suggests to open the Network Diagnostics preferences panel. When I do, I get a good diagnosis but when I ask to verify the connection and enter the WEP password it fails to connect. I close the Prefs panel and connect again using the signal icon above, and I am back online!
    Thank you again, Carolyn.

  • Query Builder results seem to max out at 500 lines.  How to change?

    Hi all,
    Some of out Application Express users are using the Query Builder tool for ad-hoc reporting. The idea is to run the SQL to extract the data, then download to MS Excel. The Query Builder results seem to max out at 500 lines. I want to increase that value. I searched all Application Express forums for 'query builder output max 500' and then 'query builder output' and did not find the answer.
    How do I change the 500 line limit in Query Builder results?
    Thanks!
    Application Express 3.1.2.00.02
    Oracle 10g
    Standard PDF printing (not BI Publisher)

    Bryan,
    Here is a link to an HTML-DB studio application, that is a QBE "replacement" for the query tool in APEX development..
    http://htmldb.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=18326:7:1387557504245687::::P7_ID:1222
    It is for an older version of APEX, but you should be able to make it work for your needs..
    Thank you,
    Tony Miller
    Webster, TX

  • Maxed out MacBook pro or Mid level MacBook pro with Retina?

    I am entering my first year in university in the next couple weeks. I am going to be studying commerce for the next 4 years. I want a macbook that will last me for the 4 years and still be a good product at that time period. Now I am wondering if I should spend $2000  on the maxed out MacBook pro or 2600 for the midlevel MacBookmacbook pro with Retina display. Looking forward to great feedback. Thanks

    It depends on how far you want to go - and how much you want to spend - in maxing out the computer. Let me visit the Apple Store -
    The 'base model' you should go with is the:
    15-inch: 2.6 GHz
    2.6GHz quad-core Intel Core i7
    Turbo Boost up to 3.6GHz
    8GB 1600MHz memory
    750GB 5400-rpm hard drive
    Intel HD Graphics 4000
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M with 1GB of GDDR5 memory
    Built-in battery (7 hours)
    This will be a 'stock' item and has the maximum amount of RAM that Apple will install and is $2,199. The only modifcation to make on this model is the CPU and hard drive, as it also comes with the maxed out VRAM for the NVIDIA graphics card. I wouldn't go for the extra speed bump on the CPU - it's just not worth it. What is worth the extra money is an uprade to the hard drive - from the 750GB 5400-rpm to the 750GB 7200-rpm for an extra $50. If you really want to max it out, of course, you could add the $900 option of the 512GB SSD, but I wouldn't do that - simply too much to pay. So for $2,249 you could get:
    15-inch: 2.6 GHz
    2.6GHz quad-core Intel Core i7
    Turbo Boost up to 3.6GHz
    8GB 1600MHz memory
    750GB 7200-rpm hard drive
    Intel HD Graphics 4000
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M with 1GB of GDDR5 memory
    Built-in battery (7 hours)
    ...and have a very fast (not warp speed, but fast) computer that should you ever decide to upgrade, you can.
    As for the Retina display, it's simply something that I would not invest in at this time. The 'base' model, with only 8GB of RAM is $2,799.00. Increase that RAM to 16GB, and you're looking at $2,999. The extra $750 just isn't worth it. And with few applications taking advantage of the Retina display (if they ever do) you're going to be looking at pixelated tools, text, etc., for who knows how many years. You could get by running only Apple applications, I suppose, but I'm just not ready to be placed in that kind of restrictive mode... are you?
    Just my 2¢, again...
    Clinton

  • HT202807 I have a MB Air 128gb and a Time Cap.802.11AC. My HD is maxed out because of 30GB of photo storage after migration to 10.3.3 Photos. Please recommend an external drive best for connecting to TC and moving the iPhoto Lib off my HD

    I have a 13" mid 2011 MB Air 128gb and a Time Cap.802.11AC. My HD is maxed out because of 30GB of photo storage after migration to 10.10.3 Photos. I have reduced apps and files as much as possible so the only thing left is to move the photos.  Please recommend an external drive compatible for connecting to my TC 802.11ac and moving the iPhoto Lib off my HD which will free approx 15 gbs. of space. I don't plan on using it for any other purpose so a small capacity drive will suffice. I know the "optimization" is supposed to adjust for this condition but I don't trust that assertion.I only have 2gb free space remaining. 

    I don't plan on using it for any other purpose so a small capacity drive will suffice.
    If you really only want such a small capacity drive.. what about just buying a 32GB or 64GB USB memory stick.
    You should still have a back up to the internal hard disk of the AC TC.
    Or just buy a WD Passport.. don't waste your money buying 500GB as it is only a bit more to buy 1TB and a bit more again for 2TB.. For future use if you do buy a USB hard disk buy 2.5" type.. and buy 1TB or if the budget stretches 2TB..

Maybe you are looking for