Advice On Merging Library's

WHAT I HAVE NOW:
An Aperture Library with around 30,000 referenced masters on an external HDD and an iPhoto library also with 30,000 images on a separate external HDD
WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO DO:
Move both Libraries to a new larger external HDD
ADVICE BEING SOUGHT:
I am not sure whether it is better to just place the old iPhoto Library along side the Aperture Library or whether to import those photos into the Aperture Library and then do away with iPhoto entirely. I cannot imagine ever using the iPhoto app again. Advantages or disadvantages either way?
If importing the iPhoto photos into the Aperture library how best to go about it.
I appreciate any and all feedback on this.
I am using the most recent versions of both Aperture and iPhoto. My computer is a 17 inch MacBook Pro running Snow Leopard.

(I hope you understand what I am getting at here)
Not quite, but I am sure we will sort that out with Kirby's aid! Kirby is the resident expert on Library organization!
First the simple part of your question: It is relatively easy to figure out what is in the different libraries; browse them using Aperture, or look inside the package in the Finder.
To browse using Aperture: Use the main Aperture menu bar: File -> Switch to Library
to switch between your Aperture libraries and to inspect them.
To browse using the Finder: Select the library in the Finder window and ctrl-click it. From the pop-up menu select "Show Package Contents". Open the "Masters" folder in the Finder and look at the Master images,
65 gifgs onboard
If you do not remember creating this library it may have been created accidentally, when you were using Aperture without your external volume being mounted. Usually Aperture then creates a library in a default location, your "Pictures" folder.
What I meant with "Space saving" is the following: I hope Kirby will elaborate on this
By now you probably are familiar with Aperture's non destructive workflow. Aperture keeps -and never changes - the original master image file. All edits are stored as versions in a way that it is possible to undo the edits step by step and to revert to the original master image file. The version image is not actually created, only the steps to create it are stored, This saves space and results in far better image processing results than storing the intermediate images.
When you import from iPhoto you will want to do it in a way that you have the original master plus the edited version in a way that Aperture can create a master-version pair as described above. Only importing as "File -> Import -iPhoto Library" will ensure this. All other import strategies will give you only the masters or the version, or both as unrelated new masters.
Before Kirby and I can proceed with your questions tell us what you know (or find out) about the different libraries you have, and exactly what imports you already have done from iPhoto. You already seem to have some images imported.

Similar Messages

  • Smart Album not merged when merging library

    Hello,
    I'm trying to merge a few different Aperture libraries I have. I noticed that when I merged one of my libraries into another one, my Smart Folder didn't get into the combined library. It isn't in the Aperture Trash either. The only thing that I can figure is that it has to do with which library is selected as the one to use to resolve conflicts. Is that correct? For example. I merged library A and B. Library A had the Smart Folder. When I did the merge, I selected library B as the one to use to resolve conflicts. And because that Smart Folder wasn't in library A, the merge process didn't being it into the newly merged library?
    This doesn't seem right to me. I can understand if there was a conflict of some kind. In this case, there wasn't a Smart Folder with the same name or that did the same thing as the one that didn't come over. So I don't understand why it wasn't merged into the new library.
    I have searched and can't find any list of what doesn't get merged and/or how "conflicts" are handled. Can someone point me to a list of what is and isn't merged?
    Thanks for your help.

    I don't know of any other list than the description in the Aperture 3 User Manual, section:  Working with Library Files (Merging Libraries). Quote from the manual
    Aperture imports the modified library from the second computer, merging the changes made to the projects and albums on the second computer into the same projects and albums on the first computer. Any files that were deleted on the second computer, or for some other reason no longer exist in the library file of the second computer, are moved to the Aperture Trash in the library of the first computer.
    This suggests that albums will be merged.
    I noticed that when I merged one of my libraries into another one, my Smart Folder didn't get into the combined library.
    Do you mean "smart album" by "smart folder"?
    I tried what you described, and each time the new smart albums from the second library appeared in the library I imported to, so what you see must be buggy. (could others please check this out too?)
    Perhaps your library (libraries) need repairing. Have tried the first aid tools on your library to repair it? Repairing and Rebuilding Your Aperture Library
    If repairing does not help, send a bug report to Apple: (from the form in the Aperture menu)
         Aperture > Provide Aperture feedback
    Regards
    Léonie

  • IPhoto Library Manager--File Size difference of merged library

    I just use iPhoto Library Manager to merge 2 libraries and it worked great. There is a huge difference in the size of the libraries. The original library is 17.48 GB. The merged library which had an additional 4.03 GB of pictures/events added to it is only 11.28 GB. I would have expected 17.48 GB + 4.03 GB to add up to 21.51 GB. Can anyone explain? What has been lost?
    Additional info: I get the same 244 events and 4426 pictures whether I open the iPhoto Library or the "Merged Library" through the finder window.
    I have iPhoto 7.1.3 and iPLM 3.4.2 installed.

    Do you sync your photos with an iPod using iTunes? If so this creates a cache file that can be very large indeed. It would not be carried over in the Merge.
    Regards
    TD

  • Moving a merged library created with iPhoto Library Manager

    I merged two iPhoto libraries with iPhoto Library Manager 3.5.5 on an external hard disk using an iMac. I have tried to move the new merged library to the internal disk on my laptop, as I wish to travel taking all my photos (about 28,500). However, every time I try to move or copy the merged library it stops after copying about 123 MB (of about 62GB) and I get the following message:
    "You can’t copy “Merged Library” because it has the same name as another item on the destination volume, and that volume doesn’t distinguish between upper- and lowercase letters in filenames."
    The "same name" reference is to the file it makes every time before copying, which I erase before trying again. What am I doing wrong? How can I transfer this new merged library to my laptop?
    Thank you.

    Ok, so how do I correct for this. I ran Time Machine to back up my computer, sent it in to be repaired, and now I want to Restore my stuff. I get that error, but the only thing I've done to the drive is reformatted using Snow Leopard, and didn't see such choices go by. I just want my stuff restored. Can someone explain the difference between "case-sensitive/journaled" and "journaled", and how to change back. Where are these choices?

  • Advice on "merging" multiple projects into one

    RH9 webhelp.
    We currently run as merged help, but for maintenance and other reasons, I would like to merge these into a single project. This is mostly due to the variety of style sheets and folder structures that resulted from many of our older topics being added using the import Word feature in earlier versions of RH. I've done this in the past with a few smaller projects, but it ended up requiring a fair amount of manual per-topic work that I'd like to avoid if possible, give the # of these that would be affected by this.
    My initial questions are:
    1. Is it recommended to use the import feature to add the child files into the parent? Or create a brand new project and add both parent and children files into that? Or to use some other method of adding/recreating the current files into an existing/new single project? Especially in terms of the questions below (i.e. folder structures, old/new styles, associated image files, etc.).
    2. Is there a way of importing that won't replicate the original folder structure? For example, in the projects I've created from scratch, all topics are under the basic folder for that project, while in older ones - which were mostly updated by importing Word documents - many topics reside in their own sub-folders, or in what were apparently early attempts to organize topics by subject. I would like to get rid of these sub-folders and have all topics in the same basic folder.
    3. Is there a way of importing images that can auto-update image file names if an existing one already uses it? Many of our older images were created using simple numbering (e.g. 1.jpg, 2.jpg, etc.). Between the various projects and the various subfolders in each project, we have a lot of shared file names, and in my initial experimenting it required a lot of manual work to avoid overwriting. Is there a way in RH (or even outside, I guess) to somehow automate renaming these images during the import process?
    4. Is there advice on mass-updating styles via style-sheets? I'm noticing a lot of weird display and control issues if I import a bunch of old topics and then try to apply our current style sheet to them. For example, RH will show that the new style is now associated with them, but they continue to display using the old style, or the wrong options (usually font styles and font sizes) are enforced with the update (for example RH seems to always default to want to use Times New Roman, even when neither the old nor new styles uses this font), or options (most commonly the font styles we use in the new style) will disappear from drop downs and the like. It just feels very buggy and not consistent or correct in being applied, and I'm worried about having to manually update or recreate a lot of individual topics because of this. Given we have some very ancient topics that have 'survived' 4 or 5 (or more) versions of RH, I guess I'm wondering if there's any old html code or similar that might be the culprit, and if so, how best to sort it out.
    Essentially, we're kind of unique perhaps in that we don't really want to retain the existing folder structures or style guides, but my experience with the previous go-through was that RH did what it could to retain those. Which is understandable, but for us it'd be nice to avoid that and especially if there's a way of doing so without having to manually move and edit each topic and image file as they're imported into the target project.
    Thanks for any tips or suggestions!

    Hi there TWnKC
    Personally, I'd copy the existing master, then begin importing the child topics in order to create a new project that is a combination of the former. And I do think it will be helpful moving forward to describe this as "Combining" as opposed to "Merging". Just so everyone is aware of the difference.
    As for the structure, it may be whatever you like and all you have to do is ensure you import the topics into the correct folder.
    Not sure about the images. That one will require a bit of testing. I might expect that if nothing is done you do run the risk of having them overwritten. So here is what I would probably do. Before importing, move images to a folder that is rather unique. That way they will be out of the way and won't get overwritten. By moving them inside RoboHelp, all references to them are updated as well.
    As for the style sheets, only picking apart what is happening will truly reveal the issues. My own guess here is that you are probably seeing some inline or embedded styling that is causing things to run amok. But once you sort what is happening, it shouldn't be a big deal to fix.
    I'm sure others will pop in and offer other additional advice.
    Best of luck to you! Rick
    Helpful and Handy Links
    RoboHelp Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
    Begin learning RoboHelp HTML 7, 8 or 9 within the day!
    Adobe Certified RoboHelp HTML Training
    SorcerStone Blog
    RoboHelp eBooks

  • Help/advice using iPhoto library manager

    I got the pay version of iPhoto library manager, and it seems to work well. But I'm looking for some advice on how to best organize my photos between the two libraries. I'm using the following basic system:
    I have my entire photo library containing all my photos on my external drive, and I named this library Lacie.
    Then I have a subset of my photos, basically my favorites and recent photos, on my laptop. This library is called Macbook. I am running low on space on my laptop (and soon will be running out on my external too and will need to get another one, but I can probably put that off for a bit).
    When I import photos, I usually import them onto my macbook, play around with the events, delete fuzzy photos, etc. Then periodically I move the new events over to my Lacie drive so that everything is on Lacie. I then delete photos that I don't like that much to make space on my Macbook.
    Now here's the problem. I went on a trip to France and I put all my photos on my Macbook, and I moved the events over to Lacie. Then at one point I organized all the france photos on my Macbook into albums. Now I'm trying to move that organization to Lacie, so I tried to drag those albums over to Lacie using Library Manager. However, it asks if I want to import duplicate photos and I don't, so nothing ends up happening except that empty albums are created. Is there a way to do this, or do I need to do all of my organization directly on my Lacie? Any advice about better ways to organize this? I'm new to this multiple libraries thing so maybe other people have worked out better systems.
    Thanks!

    Ok, so, say I import a bunch of photos from a trip. I have these photos in events by day, say 7 days worth of events. Now I want to put some of them in albums: photos to send to mom, photos to post to flickr, etc. I don't necessarily want all of them to go into albums, but I don't want to lose the ones that don't go into a particular album. What's the best way to copy those over to the Lacie once I'm done? Is it better to make one folder with all the photos from that week and then have albums within it containing the subcategories, so that I can just copy all the albums? If I copy the albums and then also copy the events, will that work?
    I guess mainly what's bugging me is that in iPhoto, photos exist in events and then are also organized into albums, like the library and playlists in iTunes. Having to think about them as separate things to copy over is confusing and I'm not sure how best to do it. I want to keep the organization in events AND albums without having duplicate photos taking up space.

  • Merge Library Fails - Claims Duplicate Library

    I am attempting to merge to Libraries. When I select the newer library as the file to import into the older Library I get an error message stating: The library could not be imported because it is a duplicate of the library currently running. When in fact they are not the same libraries. The names are different and there are altered images as well as new images.
    I tried repairing both Libraries. Each Library are on different drives.

    I'm having the same problem Michael reported (running Aperture 3.2.2 on 27" iMac with Lion 10.7.2 or Macbook Pro with Lion 10.7.2).
    J.F.'s response looked hopeful although it was a bit vague on some details.
    I tried various steps (see below), and nothing resolved the problem.
    HAS ANYONE WITH THIS ISSUE FIGURED OUT A SOLUTION?
    I had made a copy of my iMac aperture library to a mobile drive.
    I then updated the iMac library and wanted to merge those changes back into the library copied onto the mobile drive. It doesn't work: on my iMac I get the error that the libraries are duplicates (NOT true!).
    Building on J.F.'s info, I tried a few things in vain (starting with two originally-identical libraries: original iMac aperture library [modified after copying to mobile drive], and mobile aperture library that is a copy of the original iMac aperture library copied onto my mobile drive before I made some further mods to the iMac aperture library):
    * All on the iMac: option-click Aperture icon on iMac and select to create new (empty) library (on iMac hard drivez), then copy over DataModelVersion.plist from this new (empty) library into mobile library; open mobile library and merge into original iMac library: SAME ERROR
    * iMac+macbook pro #1: move mobile library drive to Macbook Pro and open there (even modified one image with an added caption), then moved mobile library drive back to iMac and open there and try to merge in original iMac library: SAME ERROR
    * iMac+macbook pro #2: option-click on Aperture icon on macbook pro and select to create new (empty) mobile library (on mobile drive!), then move mobile drive back to iMac and on iMac copy over DataModelVersion.plist from new (empty) library on mobile drive to original mobile library; open this original mobile library and merge in iMac library: SAME ERROR.
    Looking for help!
    Regards,
    Colin

  • Size of merged library

    In Aperture I've merged two iPhoto Libraries (40 GB and 46 GB), but the new Library has 110 GB. Why is it so? And can I somehow reduce this size?

    A few suggestions:
    Don't worry about it.  Aperture is really good at managing itself.
    You might some features turned on or available that were not turned on or available when you last used the Libraries.
    Let Aperture run overnight, close it, and see what size the Library is.  Aperture tends to do a lot of background processing; letting it run overnight usually lets it finish all un-done tasks.
    Repair your Library.  (Details are on Apple's Aperture trouble-shooting page.)  This should put your Library in its most efficient state.  I do this on all Libraries as part of my regular maintenance.  I have never had "repair database" make anything worse.  As with every computer file, you should never use one without having a back-up.
    Also: update your OS and Aperture, or the listing in your tag line, or both.
    HTH,
    --Kirby.

  • Advice: transferring itunes library to Time Capsule?

    We just got a Time Capsule (wireless router + HD) and I would like to move my itunes libary there, so that when I load itunes on my laptop (thinkpad, winxp sp2) it will look in the itunes library on the external Time Capsule drive rather than looking on my laptop hd -- it doesn't really matter that it's a Time Capsule, just that it's an external (network, not usb or firewire) storage device.
    Why: to be able to delete the library from my laptop hd, which is starting to fill up. I don't really need to carry around all my music on my laptop, after all, that's what the ipod is for. I still have a working itunes library, I'm not trying to fix something that's broken (yet!), just trying to free up space on my laptop hd for other things.
    Questions:
    1. I see lots of threads with people having trouble accessing external hd's. Is there a preferred way to do this so that I don't screw it up?
    2. I already have backed up my whole itunes folder to the Time Machine, just copied the files using my file copy utility. I'd just as soon not have to copy it all again to use it as my itunes library (instead of just as a backup) -- can I just tell itunes to look there rather than looking on my c: drive, or will that mess w/ my backup? Is the backup already usable as the main library, or do I have to recreate it somehow, and how?
    3. Ongoing backup: I would plan to backup the Time Machine itunes library to another external hd (usb), so I still have a backup...again, the whole thing would then be off my laptop hd.
    4. Other advice?
    Thanks!

    Hello Styles36. Welcome to the Apple Discussions!
    Can anyone give me a step-by-step assist on how to transfer and compress my dvd library to my time capsule using something other than Handbrake (will not recognize my 32 bit VLC) or Mac the Ripper.
    Other than copy files to the Time Capsule (TC), your questions are really not related to AirPort Networking or Apple-specific software so you may find better results in getting a step-by-step for using either Handbrake or Mac the Ripper in one of their forums. Note: There are a number of beta 64-bit versions of VLC floating around on the Internet. Just do an Internet search and you will find them. Most folks stick to the 32-bit versions of both programs for reliability.
    As far as copying the DVD Library, since these are large files, you will find that you will want to connect your MacBook Pro directly, by Ethernet, to the TC. Copying would be as simple as using the Finder. The TC's drive will show up in the Shared section.

  • Advice on managing library with iTunes Match

    Hi All
    I am running out of hard drive space on my mac for my music and need advice on how to manage my vast libary of music.
    I have itunes match + timecapsule but can't put trust in a cloud backup + don't know how have a media backup on my timecapsule
    Should I just think to delete my hardrive media and put trust in a itunes match?
    Any help on best practice would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Adam.

    Should I just think to delete my hardrive media and put trust in a itunes match?
    Adam,
    Absolutely not.  You must always keep a backup on physical media.
    Here is a user tip by Michael Allbritton with more explanation:  https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-4112
    And here is the official legal notice from Apple:
    "iTunes Match is provided on an “AS IS” basis and may contain errors or inaccuracies that could cause failures, corruption or loss of data and/or information, including music, playlist, and play history, from your computer or device and from peripherals (including, without limitation, servers and other computers) connected thereto. You should back up all data and information on your computer or device and any peripherals prior to using iTunes Match. You expressly acknowledge and agree that all use of iTunes Match is at your sole risk."

  • Need advice RE: Merging my Palm Z22 info into my Pantech Breakout -App?

    New to smartphones and want to merge info from my Palm unit into my phone without retyping it. Also don't want itall to show up in my contacts list. Any help is appreciated!

    When I moved from a Palm Treo to a Samsung Stratsophere, I went through a lot of headaches transferring data. I posted the things that worked here: http://groups.google.com/a/googleproductforums.com/forum/#!searchin/calendar/palm$20to$20google$20worked/calendar/ozPh4eglXso/eTkdNj76lUYJ. There might be something there that will help you. If you're able to do a Hot Sync of your Palm's data to your desktop computer, the Palm desktop software may let you export all or selected contacts to a format that can then be imported to your online Google Contacts database. Once they're there, they should sync automatically to your Android device.

  • Advice on merging partitions

    I have been trying to find the appropriate sub-forum for this...but most don't match..so I am just gonna post here. If a mod thinks it needs a moving...well..a mods gotta do, what a mods gotta do !
    This is my disk structure
    inxs ~ > fdisk
    Password:
    Disk /dev/sda: 30.0 GB, 30005821440 bytes
    255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3648 cylinders
    Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
    Disk identifier: 0x00000080
    Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
    /dev/sda1 1 1779 14289786 5 Extended
    /dev/sda2 1780 2714 7510387+ 83 Linux
    /dev/sda3 2715 3648 7502355 83 Linux
    /dev/sda5 1 8 64197 83 Linux
    /dev/sda6 9 16 64228+ 83 Linux
    /dev/sda7 17 212 1574338+ 83 Linux
    /dev/sda8 213 408 1574338+ 83 Linux
    /dev/sda9 409 1061 5245191 83 Linux
    /dev/sda10 1062 1714 5245191 83 Linux
    /dev/sda11 1715 1779 522081 82 Linux swap / Solaris
    inxs ~ >
    and this is my used partitions for Arch
    inxs ~ > df
    Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
    /dev/sda10 5.0G 1.8G 3.0G 37% /
    none 125M 0 125M 0% /dev/shm
    /dev/sda6 61M 9.8M 48M 17% /boot
    /dev/sda8 1.6G 137M 1.4G 9% /var
    /dev/sda2 7.2G 411M 6.4G 6% /home
    inxs ~ >
    So you see all even numbered drives are for Arch and odd ones were for Debian --- Yeah, it was a smartass idea I had when I created the dual boot, so that both my /boot partitions would be at the start of the hard drive thereby enabling a faster boot. Maybe its made a difference, who knows !!
    I created a dual boot because I came over from Ubuntu 5.10 >> Debian Lenny >> Arch. So I had some sentimental attachment to a deb based distro and apt ;-)
    Infact I used to prefer apt over pacman when I first moved to Arch - probably because I didn't know all that pacman could do.
    Anyway, over time, I have realized that I boot into Debian very less and in the last few months I have booted into it ONCE -- just to update it.  and also the login manager thread has given me the idea of having different runlevels run different WM's. That way I can use fluxbox too and openbox too
    So I am thinking I will get rid of it and get all the diskspace for Arch. What would be the best way to do it? Delete the debian partitions and merge them with the Arch ones? or simply whack the whole thing and install Arch all over?
    The dual boot has helped me at times when the Arch kernel update screwed up the system, I could go into Debian and rectify things...but I guess I can always use a live CD for that - and those things occur once in a while

    I want to use fluxbox and openbox on my Arch install. I read about starting different WMs on different runlevels, but I was wondering if the following in bash_profile would do the same
    if [[ -z "$DISPLAY" ]] && [[ $(tty) = /dev/vc/1 ]]; then
    xinit /usr/bin/openbox
    logout
    fi
    if [[ -z "$DISPLAY" ]] && [[ $(tty) = /dev/vc/2 ]]; then
    xinit /usr/bin/fluxbox
    logout
    fi
    That way, if I login at tty1, openbox starts up and on tty2 fluxbox does. This gives us a max of 6 different WMs installed at the same time. Although I would rather use at least 1 tty for console. So 5 + 1
    My question is will this work? I ask because I haven't installed other WM's yet, because I am still unsure if I want to mix all the config files of different WMs under the same home......maybe I will create a different user for fluxbox, but that means that I will have to configure all the apps twice in both usernames, correct?
    Last edited by Inxsible (2009-02-04 20:34:07)

  • Storage Advice for iTunes Library

    My LaCie 200G drive is almost full, I'm using it to hold my iTunes library. I placed a large number of rare live performance recordings on this drive and my collection is still growing. I'm looking for a drive in the 500G range to which I could move my current library and add new acquisitions, any suggestion?
    Thanks
    Brian

    I would look for rebate deals on a large Seagate or Hitachi IDE/ATA hard drive, and stick it inside a third-party Firewire or USB enclosure like this one or this one. This should save you a bit of money over buying a pre-assembled external drive, and assembling it yourself only requires a screwdriver.

  • Advice on itunes library sharing + backup

    Hi everyone - just converted my house from win to mac. Currently have a mac mini and macbook air. At this moment, they are completely standalone, and both backup directly to Mozy.
    I'd like to buy a time capsule, or similar type of network storage, and move the complete media folder there and have both macs access it directly for music, and photos - ~200GB. Each mac will keep their documents and outlook 2011 mail storage locally so each mac will still backup directly to mozy - i really like the idea of off-site backup.
    So, one of my questions is how will i back up the NAS to the cloud. Should one of the macs have a iscsi connection to the NAS so it looks like local storage so mozy will continue to back it up? I'm sure i'm not creating the wheel here, so any advice will be greatly appreciated.
    thanks.
    Dave

    I wouldn't backup a NAS to the cloud! Check your ISP and make sure you don't have a Cap on your monthly data usage.
    Now if you use a NAS then read the Apple document iTunes for Mac: Moving your iTunes Media folder. Just make sure you use CAT 5E or CAT 6 cables and a router/switch that does 1000 Base-T.

  • I have two libraries on separate computers. If i turned itunes match on in both computers would the two libraries merge? So if my iphone normally syncs with my laptop would i still only get the iphones library or would i get both as one?

    I have two libraries on separate computers. If i turned itunes match on in both computers would the two libraries merge? So if my iphone normally syncs with my laptop would i still only get the iphones library or would i get both as one?

    Yes, the two libraries should merge. However, you need to turn on match on one computer and let it finish before adding the second library.
    Once you turn march on n your phone then you don't sync it with iTunes, but the merged library will show up on the phone. If you don't turn on match on your phone and continue to sync then all of the music from both libraries should be available to sync to it.
    The only bit I can't confirm is what happens if you try to sync music to the phone which isnt actually downloaded into iTunes. Im not in a position to test that, but maybe someone else can help.

Maybe you are looking for