Agency Business : Creating a VBD with Posting block manual condition

Dear developers,
I have a question regarding Agency Business.
First of all I would like to introduce my problem :
1. Posting block option set for my payment type;
2. Created a VBD with a manual condition which creates a balance when releasing to accounting;
My question is :
Should the system behave in the same way and releases the document to accounting on both scenarios below?
Scenario 1
1. Run transaction WZR2
2. Inform the document number (without opening the document)
3. On the initial screen of transaction WZR2(without opening the document) click on button "Release to Accounting"
Scenario 2
1. Run transaction WZR2
2. Inform the document number
3. Press Enter to open the document
3. After have opened the document click on button save.

Hi
I assume you have info record maintained for the vendor material plant combination form where PB00 price is picked.
I do not think you can add the manual condition during ME_PO_CREATE_1.
I assume that the manual condition will be given on the custom program selection screen which in turn call the PO create BAPI.
With this assumption, I would suggest to Post the PO create BAPI & then call the PO change BAPI to add the manual condition in the same custom program.
Hope this helps.
Thanx
PP

Similar Messages

Prevent 3rd Party PO Create for SO with Delivery Block

We use Delivery Blocks on our Sales Orders as temporary blocks, for example if our Customer has sent a potentially duplicate order. However, the 3rd Party PO creation process ignores the Delivery Block (as you would expect, there's no Delivery), but we want to prevent the PO from being created. Our preference is to prevent the PO from converting the Req, rather than do something to the Req, or change the item category etc, as this leaves us with a much cleaner process if the order IS required. In that scenario, the DB could be removed, and the next ME59n batch job would pickup the open Req.
We have activated User exit ME590001 and included a check for the order DB, and this works for POs created via ME59n. However, the vast majority of our 3rd Party POs are created via Workflow process, and the exit we created does not trigger.
Does anyone know of a userexit we could use that would work any time a PO Req is converted to a PO, regardless if it's ME59n, ME21n, or Workflow etc, i.e. at the application level ?
Thanks, Paul.

Hi Paul,
You may try enhancement MM06E005.
Thanks and regards,
Polly

Order document with immediate delivery create not working with credit block

A sales order document is configured to create the delivery immediately on save. This works fine if credit is not an issue.
If the order goes on credit block and released, the delivery is not created. I realize that the reason is that the credit personnel do not have authority to create the delivery (although it is the system really doing it).
Does anyone have solution to this via standard method?

Hi Anabella,
This is a classical problem.
If you want the delivery to be created automatically, you can disable the credit check at the sales order level, and enable the Credit check at PGI level. This way the delivery will be automatically created in all the cases, but the PGI will not happen if there is a credit check failure. Now the authorised individual can act on this and release the delivery for further processing.
Otherwise, it is expected for the sales order not to create delivery if there is a credit check failure. Whether the delivery creation is automatic(immediate) or manual(VL01 or delivery due list), the delivery creation will be disabled, if the sales order fails the credit check.
Hope this helps

Posting block check in MI31 transaction

Hi,
I have done following steps -
1. Create inv document using MI31 with posting block check box selected. Step OK.
2. Doing 311 using MB1B - System prevents me from doing this movement. Step OK
3. Doing MI04 Step OK
4. Again doing 311 using MB1B - System prevents me from doing this movement, but with only one material.
If I am trying with other material, after MI04, I am able to do movement type 311 move using MB1B.
What is that it prevent me from doing 311 activity will that material after MI04?
Any input is appreciated,
Regards,
Dipak

not fully correct. the posting block is erased whenever you enter a count, it does not matter if your count matches with the book quantity or not.
The purpose of the posting block is to prevent entering movements in SAP while a phyiscal inventory is active. This is only one side of the medal. The other side is your organisation of a physical inventory. Here you have to take the same measures, you need to prevent people from moving materials until you have finished your count.
Once you enter the count, then SAP is just certain that the count has finished and the block is no longer needed.
If you counted correctly, then you will not move more than you counted, hence you will not have any issue if you post the difference some days later.

Inventory management: posting block : material master field

Hi,
In het material master you have a field Physical Inventory Blocking Indicator, but when I create a counting document (MI01) with posting block. The field in the material master is still blank. How can this happen?
Best regards,
Eric.

Hi Eric,
I guess there is some inconsistency in your system,
Please refer to the SAP Note 355939 & 192571 and you might be able to fix the bug..
Note 355939
Summary
Symptom
This note is only of importance for you if you execute physical inventory functions using the R/3 System. The inconsistencies can usually be adequately eliminated using Note 192571. This note is only intended for customers who did not discover the inconsistency in the first period of the new fiscal year and who now have problems with the physical inventory indicators.
Additional key words
RMMMPERI, MMPV, physical inventory, PIINKON, MARD-KZILL, MARD-SPERR
Cause and prerequisites
See Note 192571.
Solution
To eliminate the inconsistencies, carry out the following steps in the corresponding sequence:
1. Implement the corrections from Note 192571
2. Also implement the attached correction instructions
3. Start program ZREPPI_FLAGS (from Note 192571)
4. Start program ZINVUT30 (from Note 67072)
Source code corrections
Note 192571
Summary
Symptom
Preliminary note:
This note only applies to you if you execute physical inventory functions in the R/3 System.
In the log of the period closing program running during the fiscal year change, the number of the records closed does not correspond to the actual number of records in the corresponding stock table on the database.
As a result, the physical inventory indicators were not moved from the current fiscal year to the previous year in the records that are not closed. This means that materials, for which a physical inventory was carried out in the previous year, are dealt with by the system as if a physical inventory has already been carried out in the current year.
This problem can affect materials created before the upgrade to Release 4.5.
Additional key words
RMMMPERI, MMPV, inventory, PIINKON, MARD-KZILL, MARD-SPERR
Cause and prerequisites
The problem is caused by a program error.
Solution
If you have not yet carried out the fiscal year change (for example, if you have a fiscal year variant with non-calendar fiscal year), the attached correction can correct the error.
If you do not yet use Release 4.5B with at least Hot Package 09, in the four following form routines you must implement the deletion/insertion sequence listed in the attachment only once. Do not implement them twice each time as described in the "Corrections" section.
- Form MARD_UPDATE_JW_DB2DB4
- Form MCHB_UPDATE_JW_DB2DB4
- Form MSKA_UPDATE_JW_DB2DB4
- Form MSKU_UPDATE_JW_DB2DB4
Caution: Implement the corrections WITHOUT comment lines or added comments !!!
Comments between EXEC SQL and ENDEXEC can lead to the 'DBIF_DSQL2_SQL_ERROR' at the fiscal year change.
If you carried out the fiscal year change in Release 4.5 or 4.6A and use R/3 Physical Inventory Management, you can, after implementing the attached correction in your system, repair the affected records as follows:
Run correction report ZREPPI_FLAGS.
After the execution of report ZREPPI_FLAGS, you should implement report ZINVUT30 mentioned in Note 67072 in your system and execute the report for those materials for which a physical inventory has already been executed in the current fiscal year.
If you recognize the inconsistency only in a later period, also refer to Note 355939.
Trust this helps
Regards
Merwyn

Physical Inventory Posting Block

Hi ,
I have Created Physical Inventory Document (MI01) with Posting Block , But i will try to do REM back flash T code MFBF, it will for all the transaction good receipt and goods issue all the transaction , kindly tell me how to control this
Regards,
Ranganath

do I understand that correct your MFBF reduces the inventory that is blocked for physical inventory?
Can it be that you already entered the count? because the count entry in MI04 removes the posting block. Often people think the posting block is removed with posting the difference, but as said, this happens already with entering the count.

Package with anoymous block ?

Is it possible to create a package with anonymous block ..
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE pcpkg
AS
lvcNo NUMBER :=100;
DECLARE
var number;
BEGIN
select max(sal) into var from emp;
END;
END;
but i am getting error while creating this.how I can create it?
regards,
PC

Hi,
Wel-come to the forum.
Whenever you post you code use this before and after your code for it to be properly formatted.
Coming to your Anonymous block what is your intenet of having it.
Ofcourse it is not possible to have it as you have shown, but may be tehre is a "correct" way of doing whatever you need.
So if you could briefly explain what you need may be we all can help.
Cheers!!!
Bhushan

Master-Detail with 2 blocks based in stored procedure doesn't work.

Hi. I'm Oscar and I'm new for here.
I have a problem that i can't find the correct answer to solve it.
Well. I've created a form with 2 blocks. Both of them have the Query Data Source Type Property to "Procedure", and both procedures on database returns one ref cursor of a record type each one.
BLOCK BL_COMPETICIONES --> query data source: p_get_competiciones (p_Cursor is cursor of record (CODIGO NUMBER,
NOMBRE VARCHAR2(50),
SETCRICKETSN VARCHAR2(1),
SET01SN VARCHAR2(1),
FECHAINICIO DATE,
FECHAFIN DATE).
On triggers (on-lock, on-insert, on-delete and on-update) I have the call to the corresponding stored procedure to lock, insert, delete or update.
Well, when i've only this block in form, the form works correctly.
But when I added a second block (which is suppossed to be a detailed data from the first one), and after I've assigned the query procedure and created the relation between both blocks, then run the form and try to execute query on first block, returning records correctly, but then, when execution goes to the program unit "query_master_details", the sentence "execute query" doesn't do anything (and the cursor is in the detailed block), so detailed block continues to be without records.
I don't know how to solve this. Someone can help me, please?. Thanks.
Edited by: user5067020 on 09-abr-2009 16:38

It could be that there is something screwy with LV, but given that it uses standard interfaces for comm with the DBMS, I would not expect that. A much more realistic possibility is that the toolkit is mucking things up. (A fairly common occurrence.)
Try bypassing the toolbox -- which you don't really need anyway -- an talk directly to the ActiveX or .net interface.
Also, what DBMS? What drivers are you using?
Mike...
Certified Professional Instructor
Certified LabVIEW Architect
LabVIEW Champion
"... after all, He's not a tame lion..."
Be thinking ahead and mark your dance card for NI Week 2015 now: TS 6139 - Object Oriented First Steps

Tablespace creation with different block size

OS - rhel 4.3
kernel - 2.6.9
Oracle - 10.2
Hardware - IBM X series 346.
Defined block size for the db - 8kb.
Question: Can I create a tablespace with 16k?
regards,
Lily

You can create a tablespace with 16k blocks if, as Daljit suggests, you create a 16k block buffer cache.
I would, however, ask why you would want to create such a tablespace? The ability to have tablespaces with different block sizes in a single database was created primarily to allow the use of transportable tablespaces in situations where different databases had different block sizes. If you are trying to create a 16k block size for a different reason, there are a couple of things to be aware of
- While there are theories out there that tablespaces with different block sizes can have dramatic effects on performance, I've never seen any solid evidence that backs up this theory.
- Using different block sizes in the same database can significantly increase the complexity of managing a database. You'll have multiple buffer caches that you'll have to size, for example, automatic SGA management doesn't work with non-standard block size buffer caches, etc.
Justin

Business Management Error: You are attempting to create a user with a domain logon that does not exist. Select another domain logon and try again.

Hello,
Suddenly the working CRM is being stopped for some group of users.
I drilled down to the issue and have checked that the users from Domain in which CRM is installed are having CRM access.
But for other domain user having problem to access CRM.
I tried to add a user from a domain which is not of CRM domain then it gives following error.
"Business Management Error: You are attempting to create a user with a domain logon that does not exist. Select another domain logon and try again.
<Message>LookupAccountNameW failed with error</Message> "
The change is made - AD group have upgraded Activer Directory server to 2012 R2
Please help as the Production CRM is not working for other domain user.

We have Activer Directory Structure like below.
One Root Domain says A
and there are multiple child domain like B,C,D etc...
B,C and D are all in same level,they are child of A domain.
There are two way transitive trusts between A and all the child Domain.
But there is no trust in between B and C and so on.
Our CRM server is in B domain and B domain's user can access CRM but users of Domain C,D and so on can not access CRM.
If this post answers your question, please click "Mark As Answer" on the post and "Mark as Helpful"

Create Business Partner-FPP1-issue with grouping

HI
I am trying to create business partner using FPP1 transaction with my own grouping but i am getting error.
error "You cant create a customer with grouping PS05'.
here PS05 is my own grouping with number range defined.
please check the attached screens for details.What is wrong with my grouping? am not sure.
Any help is greatly appreciated,
regards
giri

Hi Giri,
Seems like you have done the setting for BP grouping with internal number range which is fine. Please be advised that business partner groupings need to have different number ranges and different data has to be entered for each business partner type.
If you getting this error in-spite of defining the number range and assigning the number ranges in customizing then perhaps you missed out the assignment of Business Partner (BP) Type since Business Partner types can be used to group business partners.
When a BP is created, the "business partner type" appears on the initial screen and the control data screen. BP type offers grouping possibilities for business partners.
You can define and assign BP types in
Cross-Application Components->SAP Business Partner->Business Partner->Basic Settings->Define Business partner types.
BP types are defined by a unique partner type number and a description. After this you can proceed to configure field attributes in the "field grouping" as per the selected business partner type.
Let us know if you get the same error in-spite of maintaining the above mentioned settings.
Thanks,
Sagar

Business rule put figures to the blocks not created earlier

Sometimes business rules put figures to the blocks that should have not been created yet. Business rules perform this activity without the usage of function (createnonmissingblk) which it should not. Please can someone tell me its reason?

It can be a sparse allocation that it is doing.
DATACOPY can create blocks
Sparse assignment can create blocks
@ALLOCATE can create blocks.
Regards
Celvin

Why can not freeze book inventory Storage location and Posting block?

Hello,
I tried to freeze book inventory storage location and posting block at storage location level in SAP.
1) OMBP -> "Freeze book inventory storage' is checked at that storage location.
2) MI01 -> the 'Posting Block' and 'Freeze book inventory' in the Physical Inventory Document is checked.
3) Post the Physical Inventory Document by using MI02.
But, I am still able to post inventory movement at that storage location after executing the above.
(I run MB1C with movement type 501 at that location.
I input the material number which are in the created Physical Inventory document.
The posted manterial document is created after I run MB1C.
The document date and the posting date in MB1C are the same date of Physical Inventoery Document.
I can see this material inventory movement from MB51!! )
My question is: Why SAP is allowed to execute the inventory movement after the 'freeze book inventory storage location' and 'Posting block' are checked at OMBP and MI01 ?
Any idea?
Help me, thank you.
Regards,
Sylvia Chen

Problem solved. Thank you for all help!!

Creating a PO with out hitting any Accounts

Hi Gurus,
We have a business scenario where they accept goods from different companies for free (like donations) and we have to accept them and take them into our inventory.
One of our approach was to create a PO and then create a GR with reference to a PO. But the issue was, in this process some of the accounts are getting hit, which the client dont want. only revenue account has to hit and the material should get updated in the warehouse.
Our second thought was to create a PR and send the PR to the donor and while creating a GR using 501 (without PO). but here the end user has to do a lot of updations in the GR document (for example if they have 100 line items the work is going to be tedious)
Any thoughts of work around for this kind of scenarios would be highly appreciated.
thanks
Shane

u have 2 options
create amterial master with price control indicator standrd and maintin the price of mateirial in account view now create a po with free line itme and do the gr now in this case sytem will create a accounting document and it post the amount to the stock account Dr.
and no gr/ir account hit will happen as it is a free itme so there is no question of paying any amount to vendor
u can also use movement type 511 to do the gr for that free good
option 2 create am material with moving average price in this case if u do the gr then system will not create any account document but point to note here is the price will become then zero in material master as map means latest price is updated in matreial master

SNC : Error while creating Subcon PO with Order (F) account assignment cat

Hi,
I am trying to implement Outsourced Manufacturing scenario with ECC 604 and SNC 7.0
We would like to demonstrate "Real Time Consumption" once a phase has been completed for WO in SNC.
For this, it is necessary create Subcon PO with A/c assignment category F. While trying to create PO, i get the following error:
1. Acct assignment determination is not poss.in the account assgnmnt manager
Message no. IAOM220
Diagnosis
Errors occurred during the determination of the account assignment in the account assignment manager. Thus it is not possible to determine the account assignment.
2. Characteristics for Controlling object have errors
Message no. IAOM034
Diagnosis
There are errors in the characteristics that are transferred when creating or changing a Controlling object.
System Response
Processing stopped.
Procedure
Look at the messages prior to this object in the error log. They give an indication as to which characteristics have errors.
3. Hierarchy level 01 not defined in business scenario Outsourced Manufacturing
Message no. IAOM027
Diagnosis
In business scenario 'Outsourced Manufacturing', hierarchy level 01 was accessed. There is no key characteristic defined for this hierarchy level.
System Response
Processing is terminated.
Procedure
Inform SAP or the provider of the business scenario, if the business scenario was not provided by SAP.
If you are responsible for the business scenario yourself, check the definition of the business scenario.
Settings specific to CO order that have been maintained:
IAOM1 - Maintain Controlling Scenario
IAOM2 - Maintain Controlling Integration
KA02 - Default Cost assgnmnet
Tick RT consumption in ME11 (Vendor Purchasing Info Record).
Any idea???
Regards,
Sandeep

Dear,
Did you also experience the following?
We are at the following step in the scenario:
Supplier confirms production progress =>Manufacturingworkorderproductionprogressnotification XML is generated => POST component consumption is executed in the R/3 system (ECC 6 EHP4).
We see the following problems after posting the component consumption
-     table EKBE_SC is not filled
-     in transaction kkf3 => CO production order => no booking/posting of progress
-     Component consumption is reflected in an outbound delivery with movement type 543, but it is missing the link with the purchase order+item (see screenshot below) => as a result any post issue booking is not possible.
Thanks for your help.
Kindr regards,
Stefan Hemeryck

Agency Business : Creating a VBD with Posting block manual condition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for