Aggreated Invoice Statistical posting
Hi Experts,
This question is related to Aggregated invoice posting in a deregulated scenario.
People familiar with this scenario will know that, Individual invoices are first posted to end customer contract account and then aggregated posting is made to the supplier accont based on aggregation condition.
I have restriction in my project that there is exactly 1 customer receivable GL, so for both individual & aggreated invoice I end up posting the same GL.
Can any one please suggest if the aggregated invoice can be posted statistically as the aggregated invoice is just for information purpose in our case. Also let me know the impact , if any, when we post aggregated invoice statistically.
Thanks & Regards
Satyajeet
Hi Yuvi,
Could you please elaborate your answer cause what I read in the link given below is about the GLs posted by various transactions. The link gives details of GLs posted before and after aggregated invoice posting is done. Let me know how can I post an aggregate invoice statistically in this scenario.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_utilities472/helpdata/EN/15/11de7ce13644d7941e99362a8c74d4/frameset.htm
I tried assigning a statistical key S to main & sub of aggregate invoice but its giving an error.
Thanks
Satyajeet
Similar Messages
-
Security Dept Statistical posting from SD invoice to Contract accout
Dear Friends,
Could some one help me, How the Security Dept Statistically posted from SD invoice to Contract accout level.
Because, the Security Dept amount should not directly post into any G/L account while creation of SD invoice.
Thanks in advance.IF a payment has been made to the security deposit, that entry will be reflected at the time of invoicing. That is a standard process.
-
BAdi for Statistical Posting F-38 & F-55
Hi Experts,
I am going to add additional fields in AR and AP - Statistical posting, F-38 and F-55
I try to look for BADI to maintain it, i came across FI_HEADER_SUB_1300IM, with that, i am able to add the fields for FB01 but it seems cannot be added into F-38 and F-55.
Any suggestion?
Thanks!!Hi,
For f-38 and f-55,
Enhancement/ Business Add-in Description
Enhancement
SAPLF051 Workflow for FI (pre-capture, release for payment)
RFKORIEX Automatic correspondence
RFEPOS00 Line item display: Checking of selection conditions
RFAVIS01 Customer Exit for Changing Payment Advice Segment Text
FARC0002 Additional Checks for Archiving MM Vendor Master Data
F180A001 Balance Sheet Adjustment
F050S007 FIDCCH Outbound: Influence on IDoc for Document Change
F050S001 FIDCMT, FIDCC1, FIDCC2: Edit user-defined IDoc segment
F050S002 FIDCC1: Change IDoc/do not send
F050S003 FIDCC2: Change IDoc/do not send
F050S004 FIDCMT, FIDCC1, FIDCC2: Change outbound IDoc/do not send
F050S005 FIDCMT, FIDCC1, FIDCC2 Inbound IDoc: Change FI document
F050S006 FI Outgoing IDoc: Reset Clearing in FI Document
Business Add-in
BADI_ENJ_ALT_ADR Go to alternative vendor/customer data
BADI_F040_SCREEN_600 Screen Enhancement on F040 0600 Document Header
BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS01 Screen Enhancement 1 on FDCB Basic Data Screen (010, 510)
BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS02 Screen Enhancement 2 on FDCB Basic Data Screen (010, 510)
BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS03 Screen Enhancement 3 on FDCB Basic Data Screen (010, 510)
BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Screen Enhancement 4 on FDCB Basic Data Screen (010, 510)
BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS05 Screen Enhancement 5 on FDCB Basic Data Screen (010, 510)
BADI_PRKNG_NO_UPDATE BAdI for Deactivating Update of Parked Documents
INVOIC_FI_INBOUND BADIs for Inbound IDoc INVOIC FI (Vendor Invoice)
F050S008 FIDCC1, FIDCC2 Inbound IDoc: Update Comparison Ledger
FBAS_CIN_LTAX1F02 Tax interface
FBAS_CIN_MF05AFA0 EWT - Downpayment Clearing - Tax transfer for CIN
ADJUST_NET_DAYS Change to Net Due Date
FISPLIT Online Split: Cash Discount, Exchange Rate Differences
FI_AUTHORITY_ITEM Extended Authorization Check for Document Display (FB03)
FI_DOC_DISP_LI Diversion to Document Items (FB03)
FI_FB08_SUBST_BUDAT FB08: Check Posting Date for Reversal of FI Doc. with FB08
FI_GET_INV_PYMT_AMT BAdI for determining the payment amount for an invoice
FI_HEADER_SUB_1300 Screen Enhancement for Document Header SAPMF05A
FI_PAYREF_BADI_010 BAdI: Payment Reference Number
FI_RES_ITEM_CURRENCY Document of Residual Item with Invoice Currency
RFESR000_BADI_001 BAdI for Own Processing of POR Item
FI_TRANS_DATE_DERIVE Derive BKPF-WWERT from Other Document Header Data
FVFZ Replacement for Function Modules of Function Group FVFZ
AC_QUANTITY_GET Transfer of Quantities to Accounting - Customer Exit
If it is helpful rewards points
Regards
Pratap.M -
Statistical Posting seen in Vendor balance report
Hi,
I have posted a bank guarantee through statistical posting (F-55). As per my knowledge, statistical posting does not update GL.
Statistical Entry Passed:
Vendor A/c... Dr (Special GL - G)
TO BG cleaing
But when i take a report for Vendor report along with special GL, the statistical posting is also considered. How to take a report for the same.
I know one option through dynamic selection in FBL1N.
What is TCode if i want Vendor Balance Report without statistical posting directly.select the noted items check box at the time of report execution, if u want to see the only splecial gl -G, give the G in spl. gl field at dynamic selection
-
A/R and A/P Invoice Draft - Post - Status Tracking
We post an A/R or A/P Invoice as an Draft Document using DI API, we do this for the convinience of the User to change the Tax components accordingly. Once this is done the draft document is posted as an Invoice and the draft document to be deleted. Can you guide me how to achive this.
We are using SAP B1 2005B
regards
siva.dear Jane,
Thanks for your reply. It has thrown some light to my problem. In this case as per my question the Draft has to be copied to invoice manually right. Is there a way in which I can go across directly to invoice and I would like the Accounting people to veirify or amend the Invoice and post it.
This would avoid the Draft aspect and make the process simple.
Can you suggest.
regards
siva. -
Posting of cancelled Invoice after posting date is over
Hello Experts,
I am stuck up with a situation and as such seek your help.
A invoice was generated and the subsequent accounting document was also cleared. Now after the posting date was over, someone cancelled the invoice by T.code VF11 and as expected it didnt get posted .The document flow showing is as per below :
Order - open
Invoice - completed
Accounting Document - Cleared
Cancel Invoice - Open
Now, the business and their audit policies do not allow the client to cancel the invoice in back date ( within the posting period).
What are the options do we have to tackle the situation.
JoyThe issue has been temporarily addressed by changing the posting date.
However, now the client wants us to make an ABAP development so that no user is able to cancel the invoice after posting date is over. Now for that I have the following issues. Can someone please help me out in this.
The basic process details I am following is as per below:
For Transaction Code VF11 (i.e for Cancellation of Invoice) , when the invoice number which is subject to cancellation is provided, the System should search in VBRK table for the following :-
1)The System will at first search whether the entry exists or not. If the Entry is not valid then it should give an message u201C Document xxxxx does not Existu201D.This is in line to the existing practice.
2) If the Document number is valid then it will go to the billing date field and will fetch the value from the VBRK table . Then it will match whether the value fetched (i.e. this Invoice date) is in present posting period or not. The system can find the posting period from the table V_T001B.
a.If the Invoice date lies in the present posting period then the system will allow the cancellation document to be saved. This is in line to the existing process.
b.If the Invoice date lies beyond the present posting period then the system will not allow to save the cancellation of the Invoice with a pop up message of u201C The Document number subject to cancellation do not lie within the present posting periodu201D .
Now We have looked both the tables, from VBRK we will get Doc# and Billing date(FKDAT) but when we select Posting Date from table T001B( Permitted Posting Periods) there is some issue.
1. What will be the condition for selecting records from T001B table.Since there is multiple key fields
RRCTY (Record Type) ,
BUKRS (Posting Period Variant) ,
MKOAR (Account Type or Masking)
BKONT (To Account).
So, to get unique record what will be the value of this key fields. Is there any relationship with VBRK table ?
2. Which field I have to consider as Posting Date or Period. Because there are many fields related to Posting period. -
Migo for subcontracting po- Excise invoice is posted later to material docu
Dear all,
While we are doing migo for sub-contracting PO we are getting an error like this Excise invoice is posted later to material document.
process
1. Create subcontracting PO.
2. Issue material 541 MVT.
3. Create sub-contracting challan- dated 8-8-2010.
4. Migo date 8-8-2010.
while entering subcontracting challan no & year, error messege is coming as Excise invoice is posted later to material document.
Pls give solution.
Thnaks & regards
madhuHi,
You will have to post the MIGO at least one day after the creation of Excise Challan.
Regards,
Prashant Kolhatkar -
Difference between Parked invoice and posted park invoice.
Dear All,
I am trying to create a new program to extract the invoices posted by MIRO and MIR7. I have no problem to find invoices posted by MIRO in RBKP and RSEG.
However, as currenty one user will use MIR7 to park invoices and another user will use MIRO to post the invoices, I don't know how to sparate the parked invoice and posted park invoice. C's I have found that the parked not posted invoice and posted park invoice were all displayed in RBKP with transaction code MIR7.
Thank you very much
EmmaHi,
*Park*
If the Invoice document is missing some information that is required for posting. In this case we will park the document. Here some preliminary checks will be performed. Balance might not be zero.But in this case updates were performed.
*Post*
The invoice was posted online and verified as being correct(Balance must be Zero). Updates were made.
Please use RBKP-RBSTAT field to find out the different type os status.
I hope this helps.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni -
How to know a recievable invoice is posted or not.
Hi,
I am using following query to know whether a invoice is posted or not.
SELECT 1
FROM ra_cust_trx_line_gl_dist_all RCTG
WHERE RCTG.posting_control_id=-3
AND RCTG.customer_trx_id=RCT.customer_trx_id
But this is returning '1' even when the GL batch status is 'unposted'.
Apps version: 11.5.10
Using 'General Ledger Transfer Program' concurrent program to to post the invoice to GL.
Is this the correct query, please suggest.
Thanks & Regards,
Syed.Thanks for the quick reply octavio,
That was part of Query i provided in the previous post. Here is the complete query.
Requirement:
Fetching all open invoices which are posted, not applied. But this is still fetching the invoice which are not posted. Please suggest.
SELECT RCT.customer_trx_id,
RCT.org_id,
TO_CHAR(RCT.last_update_date,'RRRR-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') LastUpdateDate
FROM ra_customer_trx_all RCT,
ra_cust_trx_types_all RCTTA
WHERE RCT.complete_flag='Y'
AND RCT.status_trx='OP'
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM ar_receivable_applications_all ARP
WHERE ARP.applied_customer_trx_id = RCT.customer_trx_id
AND ARP.application_type='CASH'
AND ARP.display='Y'
HAVING SUM(ARP.amount_applied) > 0
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM ra_cust_trx_line_gl_dist_all RCTG
WHERE RCTG.posting_control_id=-3
AND RCTG.customer_trx_id=RCT.customer_trx_id)
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM ar_receivable_applications_all ARP
WHERE ARP.applied_customer_trx_id = RCT.customer_trx_id
AND ARP.application_type='CM'
AND ARP.display='Y'
HAVING SUM(ARP.amount_applied) > 0)
AND RCTTA.cust_trx_type_id = RCT.cust_trx_type_id
AND RCTTA.org_id = RCT.org_id
AND RCTAA.type IN ('INV','CM')
Thanks&Regards,
Syed. -
Can a invoice be posted at a item level? if yes how
can a invoice be posted at a item level? if yes how?
what do u mena by postin an invoice at line item
even if u have 1 line item in invoice still some data will always be at header level such as vendor payement terms or cash discount
even if u do the direct posting still u need to mention the vendor and it is at header level -
MIRO(Invoice Verification) posting date is lesser than MIGO(Goods Receipt)
MIRO(Invoice Verification) posting date is lesser than MIGO(Goods Receipt) posting date.
Explanation:
Miro sholud be posted after the GRN has posted. It means that the Posting date of Miro should be greater than or equal to the Posting date of Migo. But I am facing the issue that I can able to post the Miro before the Migo date..
For example: I have posted the Migo(Goods receipt) document with the posting date u2013 10.8.09 and at the same time I can also able to post the Miro(Invoice Verification) posting date as u2013 5.08.09. This is should not be allowed . Kindly give me the solution. Is there any options in SAP standards to restrict this type of Postings(without using user exit).
regards
VaradharajHi
you need to use BADi for this INVOICE_UPDATE
you can give logic as whil;e MIRO system will compare posting date with MIGO doc , then create a Z error msg in se91 nad assign it in that badi
take help of ABAPer, check following link
[LINK |GR date lesser than the PO date, the system should show an error message.; -
SD invoice not posting to FI-CA
In a system where IS-Utilities is active, and which therefore uses contract accounts receivable (FI-CA), I am trying to get SD invoices to post to FI-CA.
I have ticked the box against the relevant customer account group in the IMG "Define posting to FI-CA for customer account groups" under the menu path Contract accounts receivable and payable>Integration>Sales and distribution.
The other two items under Integration>sales and distribution do not seem to apply to this situation. This is because I am trying to post a completed SD invoice to FI-CA (rather than normal FI-AR). I am not trying to merge an SD billing request in order to create a new invoice in IS-U. The billing type of the SD invoice is standard F2.
My question is, has anyone succeeded in posting SD invoices to FI-CA, and if so what other config do I need to do?
According to the SAP course IUT240 it is possible to do this posting, but it is rather thin on details of how to accomplish it.
In the menu item "Derive FI-CA document from SD billing type" I get an error when trying to insert F2 in the field Source doc type. I do not know what this field is expecting. The error is:
Source document type F2 is unknown to source document category VBRK
Message no. FKKINV267
If someone has experience of posting SD invoices to FI-CA, please help.
JohnHi Kat,
Please check if your invoice is mapped to GTS.
Thanks,
Prarit -
SAP Workflow for vendor invoice is posting into past?
Dear experts
I have a heavy problems with the workflow for vendor invoices. The following example demonstrates it:
I have created a vendor invoice on 1st of December 2011.The responsible person has checked and released this invoice on 3rd January 2012. In Customizing it is setup that posting date will be overwritten with system date.
Does anybody has an idea why it is not posted in January 2012?
What does the workflow? It is posting that invoice with posting date 1st December 2011 not with 3rd January. If I have a closer look into the head of the SAP document the following parameters are shown: document date: 1st December, posting date: 1st December, entry date: 3rd January.
Does anybody has an idea why entry date is 3rd January?
Thanks in advance
UdoDear expert
It is not standard behavior for the posting date to overwrite the document date - at least its not something that I've ever come across. I'm wondering if there is a custom substitution on your system that is overwriting the document date . Check t-code OBBH. The substitution is most likely at the document header level.
Regards
Ajeesh.s -
Purchase order history not updated when invoice is posted for framework POs
Hi,
We've created a framework PO and now posted an invoice against it. The invoice was posted in the following way:
1. Go to transaction MIRO
2. Enter the PO number in the PO reference field.
3. Select the "G/L Account" tab and enter the value manually and also enter the amount at the header level and then post it.
But when I go back to the PO, I don't see the PO history tab and hence, the PO history is not visible.
Does anybody have an idea on any config that may be missing?
Any clues will be appreciated.
Regards,
LakshmiHi
Did you refer to the same Framework purchase order while posting the invoice?
Invoice has been posted succesfully and number generated? If yes then check in MIR5/MIR6 the purchase order reference for that Invoice.
If everything is correct then you can see the IV number in PO history tab.
Thanks -
Hi All,
KSB1 report is picking up statistical posting made to a cost center there by showing the postings made are real but the actual posting is only statistical in nature.
Please advice how this can be corrected? Suitable answers will be highly appreciated. Thanks
Regards,
VinayHi Vinay,
The statistical postings on cost center are characterised by the value type of 11 (in COSP table).
An actual CO posting has value type 04.
Thus in KSB1, change the layout.
Set filter on the value type.
In case you need only the actual values, filter out value type 11.
No other change in KSB1 is reqd.
Hope this answers.
Regards,
Nisha
Maybe you are looking for
-
Updated iTunes and when I try to open it I get the following error message:
the procedure entry point ADiAdlD_AcquireMatchSlotlfNecessary could not be located in the dynamic link library C:\Program files (x86)\iTunes\iTunes.dll. then i hit the ok and get this message. iTunes was not installed correctly. Please reinstall iTun
-
Mac Pro 5,1 (mid 2012) compatible graphic cards
Hello everyone. Which graphic cards are compatible with the Mac Pro 5,1 (mid 2012)? It came with an ATI Radeon HD 5770 1024MB but the card presented problem and now need replacing. Its a very hard-to-find model in my city, so might I have other possi
-
We are trying to delete one of the hierarchies for profit center
We are trying to delete one of the hierarchies for profit center. The purpose is that this hierarchy group has become obsolete but still appears in the portal in the input selection screen. Will the deletion of a hierarchy impact the bookmarks which
-
CA-42 cable drivers and Windows 8 (x64)
Hi, Are the CA-42 cable drivers compatible with Windows 8 available? The ones that I have on a CD worked with Windows XP, but I don't think they'll be good for Windows 8.
-
Design Suggestion for Custom ADF Application
Hi I have a custom database table. I have a custom database view which has query from multiple tables including the above table. The custom table in the view is joined with other tables by columns like inventory_item_id, organization_id etc. I have t