ALE: e-recruiting organizational structure transfer

Hi friends,
I want to transfer the organization structure or the organization plan with O,S,C object types from one SAP system to another SAP system.
I have done the ALE configuration and using PAFL transaction to do the same.
I would like to know that model view i should use for the distribution also i would want to know the screen parameters in PAFL transaction.
I am doing the same for E-recruiting separate instance.
Regards,
Divya
Points would be given

Hello,
We are still having a problem with failing iDocs everytime we pass over IT0105 Sty 1 records from our SAP system to E-Recruiting.
Would anyone happen to know where I should start looking to troubleshoot this error message?
"Password is not long enough (minimum length: 6 characters)"
Currently both systems require that your password be at least 6 characters long, which makes this message even more perplexing.
Having a better understanding of how RBDAPP01 processes inbound IDOCS in status 64 would help. We are using message type HRMD_ABA. Our data filter looks like....
Infotype: 1000
Object Type: C, O, S
Infotype: 1001
Object Type: C, O, S
Subtypes: A002, A007, A008, A012, B002, B007, B008, B012
Infotype: 1001
Object Type: O, S
Subtypes: A003, B003
Infotypes: 0000, 0001, 0002
Object Type: P
Infotype: 0006
Object Type: P
Subtype: 1
Infotype: 0105
Object Type: P
Subtypes: 0001, 0010
So the question is how is IT0105 Sty 1 being processed when RBDAPP01 runs?
Thank you for your help!
Ryan
Edited by: Ryan Hubbell on Mar 31, 2009 7:00 PM
Edited by: Ryan Hubbell on Mar 31, 2009 7:47 PM

Similar Messages

Organization structure in CRM 7.0 from ECC and HR

Hi,
We are trying to download Org structures from ECC and HR. (CRM 7.0, HR & R/3 ECC 6.0)
From HR
The ALE distribution is set across the systems CRM and HR and I did the PFAL run as per the best practices BB C05. There are about 100,000 Idocs inbound to CRM system and out of which about 15K are in 51 status and the rest are in 53 status.
Observations:
The Organization structure from HR is not totally mapped in CRM but only a part of it is displayed in PPOMA_CRM.
The remaining Org units are found in 'non-related objects' selection.
All the Idocs in failure are in error "Error in subroutine read_namtb for structure of infotype ". When I go to the long text
Message no. 5-109
Diagnosis
An error has occurred in subroutine read_namtb for structure of infotype .
Procedure
Check the entry for infotype in table T777D (structure, IDoc segment, expanded structure) and the corresponding structures.
I am not sure which infotype needs to be checked in T777D.
From ECC
The CRM - ECC connectivity is set. Downloaded all the required customizing objects successfully. Switched the org model to "enhanced backend integration version " and then followed on to SPRO->CRM->Master Data->Organizational Management->Data transfer->Copy SAP ECC structure and selected all the available R/3 Organization assignments available and then selected the "generate selected lines".
Observations:
All the generated org units are in GREEN in SPRO but there are no assignments found in PPOMA_CRM not even in the unrelated objects
Checked tables HRP1000 and HRP1001 from the CRM Sales org unit IDs (ex: O 5000012) created here and they are not found but the generation is in GREEN.
I will appreciate any assistance I get here.
<< Moderator message - Everyone's problem is important >>
Regards,
DT
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Oct 20, 2010 4:25 PM

Hello DT,
Could you please let me know the process how the problem is solved..
even we are having the same issue like, we have downloaded the Org Model form HR to CRM system, till here it was fine.
when we are trying to download the ECC sales structure(CRMC_R3_ORG_GENERATE) to CRM system, i have selected all the items and triggered the Gerenerated Selectd Lines, but after all the items are generating in a error with RED.
Could you please share you knowledge, so that it will help me in figuring out the issue.
Thanks in Advance DT. Hope you reply back.
Regards,
Ven

FI organizational structure in ECC 6.0

Dear all,
I would like to know what is the suggested organizational structure in FI in ECC 6.0. For example, whether it supports multiple company code or single company code. If a company code is situated out of India, how the taxation and all will be consolidated etc. etc.
Kindly can any one provide me documents on the above subject related to Finance Module.
It will be very helpful If anyone sends the required documents
Email id : [email protected]
Thanking you in advance
Vijaya

Hi Vijayalaxmi,
SAP 6.0 ECC is supports what data you doing in previous versions like 4.7 or 5.0 etc
you can set company in india or out of india and taxation also same what you doing in previous versions
differece is ECC 6.0 is some extra functions is added on advance purpose
Organizational Units and Basic Settings
Definition
Elements of the SAP System logical structure, important for Financial Accounting.
Organizational units are used to structure business functions and for reporting. The organizational units of Financial Accounting are used for external reporting purposes, that is, they fulfil requirements that your business is subject to from external parties, for example, legal regulations. The financial statements for example, are created based on the organizational units of Financial Accounting.
Basic settings in Financial Accounting are Customizing settings that you have to make in order to be able to carry out processes in Financial Accounting.
Use
You create your company-specific organizational structure in the SAP System by defining the organizational units and making the basic settings. Defining organizational units for Financial Accounting is obligatory, that is, you have to define these units in order to be able to implement the Financial Accounting component.
Organizational unit
Definition
Client
Obligatory
Company
Optional
Company code
Obligatory
Business area
Optional
Basic setting
Chart of accounts
Obligatory
Fiscal year
Obligatory
Currencies
Obligatory
Integration
In the SAP System, you define the relevant organizational units for each component that you are implementing. For example, for Sales and Distribution, you define sales organizations, distribution channels, and divisions (product groups). Similarly, for Purchasing, you define purchasing organizations, evaluation levels, plants, and storage locations. The organizational units are independent of one another at this stage.
Components and Organizational Units
Component
Organizational unit
Sales and Distribution
Sales organization, ...
Logistics
Purchasing organization, ...
Financial Accounting
Company code, ...
Controlling
Controlling area, ...
Human Resources
Employee groups, ...
To transfer data between the individual components, you have to assign the organizational units to each other. You only need to make these assignments once in the system. Whenever you enter data subsequently, it is automatically transferred.
For example, invoices that are posted in SD are transferred to FI.
Below link will give total structure of organisational structure
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/e5/0779ee4acd11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Hope this infirmation will helps you
Prem

Organizational structure creation

[Organizational Structure creation using HRMD_ABA;
Appologies if you saw this message on Friday, because I did originally post it under the general area. I was hoping that if I re-posted it under this area I might get a few more responses. I have included the one response I got, plus my reponse, which does contain more detail about how I ran PFAL - program RHALEINI, and re poses the question about what needs to be created in SRM re an organisational structure, prior to doing an initial load using transaction PFAL.
Many Thanks
Claire
I am trying to set up the organizational structure in our SRM 7.0 system using our ECC 6 organizational structure. I have created all the required distribution models for SRM and ECC 6, and have set up the switch settings in SRM. The number range settings have been set to external.
As per OSS Note 36317, which concentrates on the initial distribution, and I am working through, I have run PFAL in ECC 6 only for object type O. The HRMD_ABA idocs have been successfully transferred to our SRM system, but all are at status 52.
The message for all the idoc segments is:
'You tried to create a relationship from object 01O 50000333 to object 01S 50000846. However, object 01S 50000846 does not exist or is not active in the period from 19000101 to 99991231'.
One thing I haven't done, which might be incorrect, is create an Organizational Plan in SRM. I specifically haven't done this because I am wanting to use external numbering, and therefore thought the organizational plan would get automatically created as part of the initial distribution.
Does any one have any idea how to resolve my problem?
Many Thanks
Claire
Re: Organizational Structure creation using HRMD_ABA
Posted: Aug 21, 2009 6:03 PM    in response to: Claire Crosby-C...           Reply
Hello Claire,
It looks like you are replicating "S". After the "O" replication you should run the "S".
Please refer to the OSS note 934372 u201CSRM/CRM: HR integration for business partner u2013 new featuresu201D & SAP Note # 550055 EBP/SRM: New integration for business partner as well.
Hope this is helpful.
Thanks
Ashutosh
Claire Crosby-C...
Posts: 45
Registered: 3/22/04
Forum Points: 0
   Re: Organizational Structure creation using HRMD_ABA
Posted: Aug 21, 2009 6:53 PM    in response to: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI     Edit          Reply
Hi Ashutosh
I intend to replicate 'S', as described in the note, but nothing has been created with my initial replication of 'O'. As per the note 363187 you are supposed to distribute type 'O' first before moving on to 'S'. Is there anything really fundamental I have missed that you are supposed to do in SRM either before or after the initial set of idocs for type 'O' are brought in?
I have also read the other 2 notes you mention.
Note 363187 stated:
'Perform the following steps in the sequence given if the target system is a
mySAP.com system (SEM, CRM, BBP/EBP):
1. If you want to use the change pointers for later changes, activate
them at once. During initial transport, you should not maintain the
data in parallel in HR because the distribution takes the blocking
mechanism into account, which can cause an incomplete initial
transport.
2. All objects of object type O are distributed with program RHALEINI. As
a transfer mode, the update mode with infotype 1000 selection should
be used.
This way you make sure that all objects of object type O are created
in the target system for existence checks.
3. As previous step but for object type C.
4. As previous step but for object type S.
So far all I have tried to do is up to step 2.
When running RHALEINI I have entered the following:
Objects - Object Type = 'O'
Reporting Period - Today is selected
Transfer Mode - Insert is selected, with the Update Mode infotype set to 1000
I did think making a setting under the Update Mode Infotype seemed a little odd, as I was doing an insert, but is this not what point 2 from the OSS Note is telling me to do?
Any thoughts would be really helpful.
Am I supposed to create a skeleton Org structure before pulling in the ECC 6 structure when I am using external numbering?
Thanks
Claire

Hi Ashutosh
I intend to replicate 'S', as described in the note, but nothing has been created with my initial replication of 'O'. As per the note 363187 you are supposed to distribute type 'O' first before moving on to 'S'. Is there anything really fundamental I have missed that you are supposed to do in SRM either before or after the initial set of idocs for type 'O' are brought in?
I have also read the other 2 notes you mention.
Note 363187 stated:
'Perform the following steps in the sequence given if the target system is a
mySAP.com system (SEM, CRM, BBP/EBP):
1. If you want to use the change pointers for later changes, activate
them at once. During initial transport, you should not maintain the
data in parallel in HR because the distribution takes the blocking
mechanism into account, which can cause an incomplete initial
transport.
2. All objects of object type O are distributed with program RHALEINI. As
a transfer mode, the update mode with infotype 1000 selection should
be used.
This way you make sure that all objects of object type O are created
in the target system for existence checks.
3. As previous step but for object type C.
4. As previous step but for object type S.
So far all I have tried to do is up to step 2.
When running RHALEINI I have entered the following:
Objects - Object Type = 'O'
Reporting Period - Today is selected
Transfer Mode - Insert is selected, with the Update Mode infotype set to 1000
I did think making a setting under the Update Mode Infotype seemed a little odd, as I was doing an insert, but is this not what point 2 from the OSS Note is telling me to do?
Any thoughts would be really helpful.
Am I supposed to create a skeleton Org structure before pulling in the ECC 6 structure when I am using external numbering?
Thanks
Claire

Input for Organization Structure finilization.

Hello Experts
I have to implement the organization structure of company for that I need some input from experts.
In plant A
Example
Process 1 in plant A
Raw Material = RM1
Raw Material = RM2
From this we produce
Semi Finish Good = SFG1
Process 2 in plant A
Adding Raw Material = RM3
& Semi Finish Good(of process1) = SFG1
We produce
Semi finish = SFG2
We sell some quantity of SFG1 and SFG2 from Plant A itself and transfer balance to Plant B for further processing
In plant B
We receive SFG2 from plant A for further processing.
SFG2(of plant A) + RM4 = FG1
And then we transfer part of FG1 to Plant C (Depot) for sale and balance we sale from plant B itself
Client wants are:
1.Plant wise balance sheet
2 Process wise cost (Process in each plant E.g Process A & Process B)
3. Process wise Revenue if we sale SFG or FG form that plant itself
What i find the solution to above case
1. 1 Company Code
2. 3 Plants
3. Plant will be equal to Segment
4. Process in each plant equal to Profit Center
But in that case one problem will arise that which profit center will we assign in Which Material as material will move form one Profit center to another in one plant itself.
Kindly suggest me, We will implement Product Costing and we are on EHP5.
Kindly share if you have better idea for above issue.
Regards,
Bittu

Dear Experts,
Any input from you all is highly appreciated.
Regards,
Bittu

Organization structure of AA

Hi
can any one tell me what is the organization structure of Asset Accounting
Thanx in advance

Hi,
In addition to providing for the management of assets and their values, asset accounting should offer an organizational structure for assets that reflects the organizational structure of the enterprise. For this reason, the FI-AA component uses the various SAP organizational units. An asset is clearly assigned to these organizational units at any given point in time.
In addition, you need to classify assets according to various accounting criteria (such as depreciation methods). This classification assists in management-accounting-oriented tasks, and in the summarization of asset values in the general ledger.
You can assign an asset to a number of organizational units by making entries in the asset master record. These assignments are meaningful primarily in other SAP R/3 applications. However, there are also functions and requirements for Asset Accounting that make it necessary or desirable to make organizational assignments.
Asset Accounting uses the same company codes as the General Ledger. However, you need to define these company codes further with the specifications needed for Asset Accounting. An FI company code is not usable in Asset Accounting until it has been defined in this way.
In order to make a company code usable in Asset Accounting, you have to assign a chart of depreciation to the company code. You do so in Customizing for Asset Accounting. Choose Organizational Structures ® Assign Chart of Depreciation to Company Code.
The business area is another organizational criterion for General Ledger Accounting, in addition to the company code.
Features
If you specify in Customizing for the General Ledger that business area balance sheets should be created for a company code, the system requires that assets be assigned to a business area during master record maintenance. The business area can also be adopted automatically from the cost center that you entered. As long as a fixed asset is assigned to a business area, the system makes account assignment of all postings to this asset to this business area, including depreciation and gain or loss postings on asset retirement.
If you want to assign a fixed asset, which has already been posted, to another business area, you have to transfer the fixed asset to a new asset master record. The posting becomes effective at the same time in the General Ledger. If you do not create business area balance sheets, you can change the business area in the time-dependent assignments in the asset master record.
Use
The meanings of the plant and location organizational units are primarily specified in the SAP R/3 logistics components.
Prerequisites
You maintain plants and locations in Customizing. Choose Enterprise Structure.
Features
Plant
Generally, the plant is a plant location or branch. The plant has no asset accounting relevance, but it can be used as a sort and selection criterion for reports. You can assign a fixed asset to one plant for a set time in its asset master record. By changing the asset master record, you can change the assignment to a different plant.
Location
The location is handled the same as the plant. In addition to a plant, you can make a time-dependent assignment of the asset to a location.
Address
In the Customizing definition of the location, you can also specify an address. Using this method, you can indirectly assign an address to an asset. The comprehensive address data consists mainly of
Street address
PO box
Information for communication (such as telephone number)
Since the address is linked to the location, all assets with the same location must have the same address. You can obtain reports related to the address using a standard report in the FI-AA Information System. You can display the address in the asset master record, on the Time-dependent data tab page.
Use
For internal accounting, you generally need to assign asset costs to cost centers. Therefore, you can assign each asset in Asset Accounting to exactly one cost center. You make this assignment in the asset master record. At the level of the cost center, you can then
Post all depreciation and interest for the asset (see System Settings for Depreciation Posting )
Plan all future depreciation and interest (for primary cost planning, see Primary Cost Planning )
Statistically post gain or loss from the sale of assets (see Additional Account Assignment )
Prerequisites
If you want to use cost accounting across company codes, then you have to set this up in Customizing for Asset Accounting. Choose Master Data->Specify Cost Center Check Across Company Codes.
You define the necessary clearing accounts for this for the different company codes in Customizing for General Ledger Accounting. Choose Business Transactions.
Features: The cost center assignment of a fixed asset can be set to begin on a specific day. If this date changes over the course of time, the system distributes depreciation and interest, according to the appropriate period, to the different cost centers, whereby costs are always allocated to the cost center valid at the end of the depreciation period. The history of the cost center changes can be managed in the system as long as you wish. A cost center can also be assigned to a business area as an asset can. In asset master record maintenance, therefore, the system ensures that the business area of the cost center matches the business area of the asset.
If you assign assets to more than one cost center at the same time, you have to do one of the following:
Distribute the costs within cost accounting using a distribution cost center.
Post depreciation and interest to an internal order and then settle the order
Hope this helps. please assign points.
Rgds
manish

Organizational Structure creation using HRMD_ABA

I am trying to set up the organizational structure in our SRM 7.0 system using our ECC 6 organizational structure. I have created all the required distribution models for SRM and ECC 6, and have set up the switch settings in SRM. The number range settings have been set to external.
As per OSS Note 36317, which concentrates on the initial distribution, and I am working through, I have run PFAL in ECC 6 only for object type O. The HRMD_ABA idocs have been successfully transferred to our SRM system, but all are at status 52.
The message for all the idoc segments is:
'You tried to create a relationship from object 01O 50000333 to object 01S 50000846. However, object 01S 50000846 does not exist or is not active in the period from 19000101 to 99991231'.
One thing I haven't done, which might be incorrect, is create an Organizational Plan in SRM. I specifically haven't done this because I am wanting to use external numbering, and therefore thought the organizational plan would get automatically created as part of the initial distribution.
Does any one have any idea how to resolve my problem?
Many Thanks
Claire

Hi Ashutosh
I intend to replicate 'S', as described in the note, but nothing has been created with my initial replication of 'O'. As per the note 363187 you are supposed to distribute type 'O' first before moving on to 'S'. Is there anything really fundamental I have missed that you are supposed to do in SRM either before or after the initial set of idocs for type 'O' are brought in?
I have also read the other 2 notes you mention.
Note 363187 stated:
'Perform the following steps in the sequence given if the target system is a
mySAP.com system (SEM, CRM, BBP/EBP):
1. If you want to use the change pointers for later changes, activate
them at once. During initial transport, you should not maintain the
data in parallel in HR because the distribution takes the blocking
mechanism into account, which can cause an incomplete initial
transport.
2. All objects of object type O are distributed with program RHALEINI. As
a transfer mode, the update mode with infotype 1000 selection should
be used.
This way you make sure that all objects of object type O are created
in the target system for existence checks.
3. As previous step but for object type C.
4. As previous step but for object type S.
So far all I have tried to do is up to step 2.
When running RHALEINI I have entered the following:
Objects - Object Type = 'O'
Reporting Period - Today is selected
Transfer Mode - Insert is selected, with the Update Mode infotype set to 1000
I did think making a setting under the Update Mode Infotype seemed a little odd, as I was doing an insert, but is this not what point 2 from the OSS Note is telling me to do?
Any thoughts would be really helpful.
Am I supposed to create a skeleton Org structure before pulling in the ECC 6 structure when I am using external numbering?
Thanks
Claire

Organizational Structure Request

Dear Consultants;
i made an organizational structure using LSMW as follows:
-create org units (LSMW)
-create positions (LSMW)
-create relations between org units and relations (LSMW)
-assign company code, personnel area & subarea to org units (LSMW)
-assign groups & subgroup to positions (LSMW)
now i want to include this structure in a request to transfer it to production, how can i do this?
Regards;
Evan

Dear rkvarma;
Really thank you i tried the report you sent and it worked well with no problems at all, i don't know what are the mismatches you are talking about, anyway thanks a lot, i just want to know what are the switches TRSS CORR, TRSP CORR you are talking about.
Regards;
Evan

Sales structure transfer from R/3 to CRM - Generate = RED

Hi Experts,
as we created new sales offices and sales groups in our R/3 system we have to transfer them to CRM.
After the generation of the selected lines the new organizational units have been transferred to CRM but in the transfer table below I can see red light in Generated column and zeros in the CRM sales organization and CRM sales office columns.
Could you please tell me how to solve this problem?
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Tom

Hi,
You can run the trasnaction "copy r/3 sales structure" only once. Any change to the organizational structure in R/3 after that, has to be maintained mannualy in CRM, transaction PPOMA_CRM.
Susana Messias

Buffering of the Organizational Structure

Hello,
i have to implement the following things:
Implementation: The buffering indicator must be configured in transaction OOATTRCRUST for the
scenario you use in CRM.
To do this, call transaction OOATTRCUST. Check field buffering for the Sales, Marketing, and/or Service
fields, depending on the CRM scenarios you use.
Afterwards, schedule a background job to run periodically on a daily basis with the report
HRBCI_ATTRIBUTES_BUFFER_UPDATE and the
variant SAP&CRM. The report HRBCI_ATTRIBUTES_BUFFER_UPDATE must be executed on a daily
basis after midnight. One background job will be scheduled at this time. The runtime depends on the size
of the organizational plan.
In transaction OOATTRCUST i can see the scenarios BBP, SALE and Service.
How can I find out which scenarios are active?
Thanks for your help
best regards
Lutz

Hi Yannick,
I think you should go for the ALE communication to do the transfer of Org management objects from production to target systems.
Tcode PFAL can be used to transfer the Org objects from one system to another.
But study the SAP's documentation on this transfer .
Check out this link for that.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/af/7e844367c24d4a950df3205052769d/frameset.htm.
Other than that,I would suggest you to do is complete testing before the actual transfer.
Let us know if you need further help on this.
Regards,
Karun

Dilema over Plant / Organization Structure

Hi,
We are a Service Provider Company based in Orissa.
We receive Contracts from other Companies & execute them across India (different Project Sites). We have different Project Site across India.
In SAP, do we need to create all the Project Locations as PLANT.
Or, we can simply create a SINGLE PLANT & treat all the Project Sites Storage Locations.
As of now I have treated all the Site Locations as Plant.
For example, in Jharkhand, we have got two offices, one in Ranchi & another in Dhanbad. The Ranchi Site is taking care of three different projects running near by & Dhanbad Site is taking care of two different rojects. We have created both Ranchi & Dhanbad as Plants.
But while discussing the Organization Structure with our seniors, some one suggested that there is no need to create Project Sites a Plant; the same can be managed using Storage Locations only. They have proposed to create Jharkhand as a Plant; Ranchi & Dhanbad as Storage Locations. The problem with me is that there are different people handling purchase & stock both in Ranchi & Dhanbad.
Also there is some Stock Transfer from Ranchi to some other States (for example, Guwahati & Silchar in Assam).
If we create Jharkhand & Assam as Plants and Ranchi ,Dhanbad, Guwahati & Silchar as Storage Locations, will be logically true.
I am in a dilema as I am not aware of how the Project Systems people map the Plants in SAP. Here in our case, the Project Systems guy is thinking of STATE as Plants while I personally think that Office Locations from where purchase & stock keeing is done as Plants.
I am confused about the process for transfering Materials among the locations (withinn and outside State)
Pls. guide.
Regards
Aditi..

Discuss with your client , How they are handling the procurement in Legacy..
IF you they are using de-centralized Procurement then you need to define the respective procurement centres as Plants.. (Which will allow you to address the taxes & Valuation of Material )
If they are using the sites only for monitoring the stocks & goods movements, then you need to define them as Sto Locations..
It all depends upon the inputs from the client & the Legacy business scenario..
Prepare a Presentation detailings the advantages & dis-advantages of defining as a Plant or Sto location..
First Discuss the same with your colleagues and then with the client..

Transporting Organization structure.

Hello Gurus,
We need to transport the organization structure from our development box to the training box. We don't have HR implemented in our R/3 system.
It will be really helpfull if some one can let me know the step by step procedure to transport the organization structure.
Best Regards,
Mahesh. J

Hi,
you can use report RHMOVE30 to transport the org strcutre - see thread Re: SRM Org Structure.
You can also use ALE to move the Org Strcutre between clients - there is a document called "Set up, Transport and Copy SRM Server 5.5". You can search for this on the Service Marketplace to find it.
Cheers
Chris

Error while creating the Organization structure.

Hi,
I am trying to create an Organization structure in SRM 5 sytem, I have created a Root for the structure and when i try to click on the Attribute Inheritance or the Check tab below i am getting an error "Start program BBP_LOCATIONS_GET_ALL first (see note 563180 and long text)" but i have replicated one plant from the R/3 system using BBP_LOCATIONS_GET_SELECTED and the material groups and all the other relevant datas from R/3. I can see in the table BBP_LOCMAP the plant been associated with the relevant company code. I am now struck in creating the organization structure. I am not sure where i am going wrong while creating the Org model.Please give me your valuable inputs to overcome this error.
Regards
GGL

Go to transaction SM30, table T77S0
Add an X to the following entry:
Group = EBP
Sem abbr. = LMIGR
Val. Abbr. = X
Description = Locations Successfully Migrated
This tell the system that the locations have been replicated and the error indicating location get all needs be executed will go away.
thanks,
justin
Edited by: Justin Farley on Feb 25, 2009 7:16 PM

Problems assigning BP to a position in the organizational structure

I tried to assign a bp to a position in the organizational structure,
but I receive this message "Object cannot be assigned to object CliC
Agent in the period 21.12.2006 - 31.12.9999".
Also, I notice that in the screen, the checkbox where i can select for
the business partner is missing.
However, I can assign a user to the org structure.
Before upgrading, it was working. This is the support packages that it was in.
SAP_ABAP: Level 9
SAP_BASIS: Level 9
PI_BASIS: Level 9
SAP_AP: Level 6
BBPCRM: Level 6
After the upgrade to the following,
SAP_ABAP: Level 10
SAP_BASIS: Level 10
PI_BASIS: Level 10
SAP_AP: Level 7
BBPCRM: Level 7
The assigning of business partner to a position no longer works.

Hi,
we're facing exactly the same problem, it was all going well until we went on production.... we applied note 997009 which results in a different error... did you manage to find a solution yet ?
Regards,
Jacob.

Calculation of minority interest in matrix organization structure

Hello-
We are currently implementing sem-bcs and have a matrix organization structure in place. We use company code and profit center as consolidation units. Company code being the currency carrying unit.
We are facing an issue in minority calculation-
Let us take the following example -
Investee A - books equity in pc A
Holding entity B books investments in pc B
The above information were entered in AFD and was also pulled in BCS as RFD..
The first consolidation happens as per our expectations.
For subsequent consolidation, the retained earnings account (additions movement) could have multiple profit centers. The system calculates minority interest correctly for combination of retained earnings addition @ PC A. However for all other combinations (I.e retained earnings for PC other than A), the system treats the entire amount as minority interest (even though that's not the case)..
Kindly advise.
Thanks!

Hi,
Thanks for your reply...
The PC hierarchy is already in place..I maintained Additional Financial Data for the other combinations (of Cons Unit and PC) with 100% share and zero value. The system considered that and calculated minority interest correctly.
I wish to know if the above approach is ok..
Thanks

ALE: e-recruiting organizational structure transfer

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for