Alternate base for ED calculation in PO

Dear All,
Kindly guide on below isse.
Suppose I have to Procure material A @ Rs. 100 then its PBXX / PB00 value will be Rs.100 and system will pick this value as Base for Excise calculation however there is a discount of 25% leading the price of the Material to Rs. 25.
Now I want the system to consider this Rs.25 as base for calculation of Excise duty. Please guide to configure the scenario.
I am using TAXINN procedure.
Regards,
Sananna

Hi,
As per SAP standard & statutory norms Taxes such as ED and VAT are always calculate on Gross the condition type for the same is BASB in FI tax procedure. If you wish to add any other condition type such as discount & freight which added to Gross and Excise duties should calculate on this ( Basic+ Freight + discount= Excise 10%) to be calculated in that case in subtotal column of MM pricing procedure you need to enter 4
In the dame way if you wish the system to calculate Excise duties as (Gross u2013 Freight- Discount= Excise 10% ) then you have to adjust in condition record in FV11 for relevant condition type such as JMOP instead of 10% it might be less than 10 you have arrive to that calculation in the reverse way then maintain the condition in the FV11 If you are using TAXINN procedure or if you are using TAXINJ procedure then in FTXP for the relevant tax code you need to change the calculation in the same way but remember if you carry out this changes in FTXP it will be applicable to all the PO which are using same tax code .Hope this clear.
Regards

Similar Messages

Cost center planning for overhead calculation

Gurus,
I have a doubt regarding the cost center planning for overhead calculation.
My scenario is:
There is a service cost center from which a certain percentage I want to allocate to the products as overhead. Now while doing so I have created a cost center and a cost element of type 43 (internal activity allocation). This cost element is the base for overhead calculation. Also I have created one cost element of type 41 (overhead rates). I have defined the credit (of cost sheet) with the cost element of type 41 and the cost center as mentioned.
Now I am facing a problem while planning the cost center with cost element type 43 through KP06.The system is throwing the error message: 'Cost element xxxx can only be used for activity input'. My understanding is we must carry out the planning for the cost center to allocate a certain percentage to the product cost estimate. If I am not allowed to use the cost element of type 43 to plan, what should I use for the planning?
Request your suggestion.
Thanks in advance!
Snigdho.

Hi
Since you mentioned catg 43 cost element, I thought you are using Activuty Type
To apply overhead on the product during CK11N, you need not plan any value on the cost center... The values planned in the cost center can not be used as a BASE in your costing sheet....
It goes like this
1. Your cost estimate has BOM + Routing
2. So, the cost elements that you would see during CK11N, can be broadly classified into 3 types
a. Primary cost ele - Material Consumption accounts for BOM components
b. Secondary cost ele (Catg 43) - If you use any actvity type in the routing
c. Secondary cost ele (Catg 41) - These cost elements are parasites... They need some basis to calculate the overhead value... That basis can be either the (a) or (b) above.....
I think, what you are planning to do is Plan Primary cost ele in a cost center and trying to use the same as the Basis.. That wont work!
What you need to do is
a. PLan the values in the cost center, say, 100,000 USD
b. Absorb it on the basis of 2.a or 2.b
If 2.b is not applicable in your case, since you are not using activity types, then 2.a is the Only option left for you
Hope it is clear....
Regards
Ajay M

Alternate calculation type and alternate base value

hi all,
please guide me the concept of alternate calculation type and alternate base value

Hi,
ALTERNATE CALCULATION TYPE:
      This function allows you use a formula as an alternative in finding the value of the condition type,
instead of standard condition technique. this can be used to calculate complex tax structures.
ALTERNATE CONDITION BASE VALUE:
      The alternative condition base value is a formula assigned to a condition type in order to promote an alternative base value for the calculation of a value.
And Refer this link.
http://sapsdforum.com/2007/09/05/pricing-alternate-calculation-type-alt-condition-base-value-and-requirements/
Hope it helps you,
Regards,
Ravindra.

Changing base for calculation of Tax

Hi All,
SAP standard delivers 0001 condition type in Tax calculation procedure as base for calculation of Tax. condition type 0001 picks up 0PR0 as base for calcualtion of tax. Can someone tell me how does system picks up 0PR0 as base for calculation of tax as i have to change the base of calculation.
Any hint would be a great help.

I think I had the cart before the horse on this problem. The correct way to look at this is what is the best way to get the correct "Net Book Value" and not the correct tax depreciation posting as it never actually gets booked.
By knowing the incorrect Beginning BV, the rate depreciation is applied in year 1 and finally the desired Net BV value at the end of year 1 for tax purposes I am able to calculate the correct Unplanned Depreciation for tax to make everything work out correctly.
correct beginning tax BV $1,200
Beginning Asset Book Value $1,800
depreciation $360 (20% of BV)
Unplanned depreciation $?
Net BV for tax at end of Yr1 $960 ; or 1,200 - (1,200*.2)
With the know values above that makes my unplanned depreciation for Yr 1 to be $480. Year 1 and all following years depreciate correctly after the Unplanned Depreciation is posted.
I am marking this as resolved unless someone sees an error in my thinking.
Thanks,
Jeff

Base amount for tax calculation in billing document

Dear Experts,
Can you help me in this scenario
when i create a billing document
Selling Price :74,766.36
Output Tax: 5233.65
Final Amount: 80,000.01
the total should be 80,000 in this case as per customer PO.
the actual difference is coming from Tax rounding off done by SAP.Initially we added DIFF condition to adjust the Tax amount.
But it is affecting the Output VAT report, where it shows 0.01 values. business does not want that, so we added DIFF condition to Selling Price.
Net                 74,766.35 THB
Tax                  5,233.65
This is how it post to accounting
01 8000485 Custome. 80,000.00
50 2100100 Revenue Gds - Dom 74,766.36-
50 2623600 Output Tax 5,233.65-
40 2100100 Revenue Gds - Dom 0.01
But the base amount for tax calculation is not chaning even after adding DIFF condition.
   Tax amount         Base amnt           Tx   Tax ra
    5,233.65-          74,766.36-           O7    7.000
           Output Tax rate 7%
Is it possible to change the base amount for tax calculation to include DIFF value?
Can you please advise? If i maintain Tax condition at header level, does this solve it.
Regards
Pradeep

Hi,
Please check your condition type settings for Rounding Rule
may be it is marked as commercial
mark as B and check it might work

Base Value change for CST calculation

Hi,
I've a requirement that CST should get calculated on an assessible value and not on Net Price in the PO. e.g.
Basic Price: 100
BED@10%: 10
ECess@2%: 2
SHECess@1%: 1
Subtotal 1: 113
Assessible Value for CST: 90
CST@4%: 3.60
Total: 116.60
How can we change base value for CST calculation in Tax Procedure?
We are using Tax Procedure TAXINN.
Thanks in advance.
Regards.
Manoj

Hi All,
I got the solution for my issue so closing the thread.
I changed the Tax procedure.Add two new condition types, one for Assesseble value for CST calculation and another one which is a copy of JVCS(CST condition).In case when no assesseble value is maintained, new condition type for CST will be zero.
Regards.
Manoj

Enabling alternate account for specific accounts

Hi all,
Because of a project requirement we are to map two accounts (say A, B) with alternate accounts (say A1,A2,A3 with A and say B1,B2B3 with B). Currently alternate accounts are not used in production. In test environments we enabled alternate account at 'Installation Options' and 'Ledger for a unit' definition. Created alt accounts and mapped with accounts.
On the basis of account alt account combination tax applicable is calculated.
When we edit the journal in GL now, it gives error "The mapping between Account and AltAcct is invalid." for any journal line containig accounts other than A or B. Is therer any way by which we can avoid this error for journal lines containing accounts A or B. Or to validate the journal.
Otherwise if we have say 700 accounts in all in production, then creating alternate account for each account and mapping and analyzing the impact of the same gets beyond the scope of the project. Please help or suggest with any ideas.
Thanks in anticipation
Rohan
[email protected]

Check below link. It may helpful to u
PIA: PeopleTools 8.5x Timeout Settings - Guidelines for Setting Timeout Values and Troubleshooting Timeout-Related Issues [ID 1470518.1]

In import process,how excise base value is calculated in MIGO

Hi expert's,
In import process,how excise base value is calculated in MIGO,with what referance values get add to base value.
waiting for your valuable response,
Regards
V.raj

hi,
we Tried with your following reply ! but still not finding exact value in base value .
(MATERIAL PRICE* QTY IN MIGO * EXCHANGE RATE)
thanks & regards
V.Raj

Cross Company Stock Transfer- Please check excise base for the item is zero

Hi,
My scenario is Cross company Stock transfer (Two different Company Codes)
I have done following steps :
1.Create Purchase Order
2.Create Outbound Delivery for Purchase Order
3.Post Goods Issue for Delivery
4.Creating Billing Document
5.Creating Excise Invoice
6.Printing of Excise Invoice
7.Post Goods Receipt for Stock Transport Order
Till MIGO there is no problem.
I am getting a errro while doing MIGO with reference to Outbound Delivery, when I enter Excise Invoice created in sending plant, I am getting error as
"Please check excise base for the item is zero" - Message no. 4F121
Excise Duty values are flowing as per the excise invoice but system make base value as 0 , I have maintained Assesable value in J1ID also. We are using TAXINN.
Pl. help
Thanks
Vikas

Hi
The best way to slolve this problem, Now is to maintain Assable value in Material Master For reciving Plant.
Hear you can maintain all the chapter id, register A or C, etc
and then try doing GR,
The other way and the permanent solution is
VPRS or equivalent
Condition class B Prices
Calculat.type C Quantity
Condit.category H
Cond.control H Condition value fixed
Condit.origin A Automatic pricing
In this Condition category is most important and by this only system copies the base amount for excise duty calculation in MIGO or J1IEX.
Regs
Niti Narayan

Client wants freight charges to exclude from discount base for payment

Dear All,
Client wants freight charges to exclude from discount base for payment to vendor.
We have maintain the customization of "Discount base is net value" in Global Parameters for company code.
But while payment to vendors, the system is adding the freight amount in the discount base, which should not be.
Please advice, how we can solve this problem.
Is there any customization needed for that ?
Regards
BIJUDAS

Hi,
The net caclulation is meant for calculation inclusive of exclusive of tax amount and not freight amount. If you want to acheive this fro freight, the only way i see it is thrugh separate invoices. Alternatively you will have to go through the ABAP route in terms of user exits.

Cost sheet report for overhead calculation

Dear All,
I was going from below thread but not able to create the report for overhead head calculation (Cost sheet - KGi2)
is there any std. report available for that.
i have to show the Base , percentage and amount of base and percentage calculated against an order or monthly.
Kindly give some input on this
Report Painter
thanks
Bittu

Thanks for reply,
In KGI2 we can see individual order but i want report for multiple selection of an order..
or system club multiple order and show the structure of cost sheet.
Bittu

Alternate text for "Text content"

Hi friends,
I have one doube in postscript language to implement alternate text for "Text content"
Can anybody please help me on this
We have using the below tags for alternate text for images.
[/Subtype /Figure /Alt (Image of Figure 2-1) /StPNE pdfmark
[/_objdef {layoutObj} /type /dict /OBJ pdfmark
[{layoutObj} <</O /Layout /Height 70 /Width 140 /BBox [90 290 250 360]
[/Obj {layoutObj} /StAttr pdfmark
[/StBMC pdfmark
Please share me your comments
Regards,
Jayakrishnan

I wouldn't swear to this, but I think what's happening is the effect is essentially treated as a separate image during export, but as far as I know you have no way to select it to add the alt text or anything else. I don't really do this kind of work, so I could be way off base here.
A newer version of ID might behave better, so you may want to consider downloading the trial for CS4

The frozen average base for absence is always recalculated

Hello,
I can't understand why the system in my configuration still recalculates average base for an absence which is set as frozen for the beginning day of the absense.
A person had the leave from 130809 till 030909; so the leave was divided for payroll into 2 parts - first: 130809 - 310809 for first payroll period; second: 010909 - 030909 for second. The first payroll period was calculated right; the averafe for the leave was set and frozed.
The second payroll period was calculated uncorrectly - the wage for second part of the leave was recalculated using another average base; so the frozing option doesn't work as I expected.
In the configuration the average for the leaves are calculating using data from the current month and 2 months before; so may be this kind of solution works no so good?
Earlier, I had no experiences with the frozed averages.
So, can anybody help me to analyse and solve this problem?
My best regards,
Ireneusz

Check your trackpad settings or call Apple tech support since your computer is "new." Take advantage of your warranty before it runs out.
Intel-based Apple Portables: Troubleshooting unresponsive trackpad issues

Alternate UoM for Production

Dear All,
I have maintained alternate UoM for Production in material master work scheduling view.
The ratio is 1000 KG (Production Unit) : 1 EA (Base Unit). Before starting the production the weight estimate is 980 KG for a particular production order, but Base unit remains as 1EA. So in Production order the moment I make the Production amount as 980KG it is changing the Base unit quantity to 0.98 EA. I have different production orders where the ratio becomes different. Somewhere it might be 980Kg and somewhere it becomes 1020KG.
I cannot change the UoM in material master everytime. Please suggest how to resolve this.
Thanks
Geravine

Hi!,
For this scenario you need to implement batch specific unit of measure where you can change the wieght of each produced batch while keeping the base unit value same. Here system will ask for conversion factor for the recieved batch at the time of GR. So you can store for example, one batch with relation 1 EA = 980 KG while the other as 1 EA = 990 KG.
Please refer following link for further details:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/25/28428b4f7811d18a150000e816ae6e/frameset.htm
Please revert back in case of any further issue.
Regards,
Uday

Copa assessment value as base for allocation of other costs

Hello,
We have a scenario wherein certain costs like travel, communication should get allocated in copa based on Employee Cost...
This employee cost is getting transferred to copa through assessment in two stages namely as Direct employee cost and Indirect Employee cost...
Now the requirement is based on Employee cost (i.e. Direct employee + Indirect employee cost) above said expenses like travel and communication should get allocated to say respective profit center.. please refer the attached working...
Is it possible to do allocation like this wherein based on one assessment cost value, which is taken as base for allocation of other costs...
Hope am making my requirement clear..
Thanks
karthik

Hi,
So you mean that you have 1 value field for direct expenses and 1 value field for indirect expenses?
If this is the case there is not way (automated) I can think about for you to do an allocation based on costs that are already diluated in thes two value fields. Manual calculation and update of SKF could be an option.
But you could think of rethinking the way you allocate your costs. For example cycle 3 might come earlier in the process and allocate travel, communication into cost centers where you post the employee expenses. then you can allocate employee cost centers to COPA as direct/indirect.
regards
Ali

Alternate base for ED calculation in PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for