AMD E-450 APU and KMS

I have this weird behaviour with my AMD E-450 APU using the native radeon drivers. KMS initialization sometimes causes the screen to be full of various coloured pixels (and you see the contours of text in what I presume to be the black/white contrasts in the noise). Usually re-starting again once or a couple of times resolves the issue.
It almost seems like KMS is trying to initialize before the graphics of the APU has "heated up" if that makes any sense at all...
Anyone got an idea for a solution? Not critical but annoying.
btw: this problem has persisted over several kernel releases and radeon updates.

I also have this CPU/GPU/APU and already filed a bug report. But I don't see "various coloured pixels", but only a black screen (although: one time I had white stripes on black ground, like a zebra)

Similar Messages

HP Pavilion 15 notebook pc AMD A6-5200 APU with USB Problem

Hi there,
I bought a laptop "HP Pavilion 15 notebook pc with AMD A6-5200 APU and product number E8A72UA#ABA with window 8 on it but suddenly something went wrong that I had to formate it.
But since then, all my USB had stop functioning I could'nt find the driver for the USB. please somebody help me.
Thanks

Hi:
Windows 8 is supposed to have the USB drivers incorporated in its driver database.
The only suggestion I can offer, would be to install the chipset driver directly from AMD and see if that restores functionality to the USB 3 ports.
http://support.amd.com/en-us/download/chipset?os=Windows%208%20-%2032

I am running Photoshop CC 2014 on Windows 8.1 with an AMD quad core processor and AMD E1-2100 APU with AMD Radeon HD 8210 Graphics Card. I have installed the latest driver version 13.152.0.0. When I activate puppet warp, the mesh appears over the image an

I am running Photoshop CC 2014 on Windows 8.1 with an AMD quad core processor and AMD E1-2100 APU with AMD Radeon HD 8210 Graphics Card. I have installed the latest driver version 13.152.0.0. When I activate puppet warp, the mesh appears over the image and I can place the first pin. However, when I go to add the second pin, Photoshop crashes. I have tried with on a new, blank file, with just a few lines on it, but, as soon as I place the first pin, the image disappears, and then, as soon as I click anywhere else in the image, Photoshop crashes. I have followed all the online advice about settings under the Preferences/Performance interface, but nothing fixes the problem. Can anyone please help?

BOILERPLATE TEXT:
If you give complete and detailed information about your setup and the issue at hand, such as your platform (Mac or Win), exact versions of your OS, of Photoshop and of Bridge, machine specs, such as total installed RAM, scratch file HDs, video card specs, what troubleshooting steps you have taken so far, what error message(s) you receive, if having issues opening raw files also the exact camera make and model that generated them, etc., someone may be able to help you.
A screen shot could be very helpful too.
Please read this FAQ for advice on how to ask your questions correctly for quicker and better answers:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/419981?tstart=0
Thanks!

Adobe premiere cs6 crash with AMD A8-5600k APU whit Radeon HD

Hello everyone, I am writing because every time I do a rendering with adobe premiere cs6 me pc crashes, blue screen error, or turns off and ariavvia from nothing ..
and I noticed that this problem from me especially when laoro with avchd files (. mts) because I tried to do with rendering. avi file and the problem seemed solved
I have a windows 7 ultimate 8gb ram - AMD A8-5600K APU with Radeon HD graphics
with 4.30Ghz processor
Help me thanks in advances! cheap to make!

That MAY be a hardware error... since video editing stresses all components
Read Bill Hunt on BSOD http://forums.adobe.com/thread/772169

Will there be an X ThinkPad with an AMD E-450?

Hi,
can anyone tell me, when and if Lenovo will bring out a ThinkPad with an AMD E-450? E.G. an X-121e with E-450 instead of E-350. Or do you believe they will skip this "better E-350"?
thanks

Lets all hope for that. But i am not sure whether you would get a 10 hr battery at the same time reducing the size and weight, as battery technology hasn't really improved by that much. I would imagine 7 hrs is more plausible.
Price wise, you probably won't get it that cheap, unless you have the Premium Club discount during sales season.
Regards,
Jin Li
May this year, be the year of 'DO'!
I am a volunteer, and not a paid staff of Lenovo or Microsoft

[Solved] radeonsi: only Software Rendering with AMD A10-7850k APU

Hi,
I have a new computer with an AMD A10-7850k APU.
I installed Arch Linux as usual and now get only Software Rendering with the open source drivers.
$ glxinfo | grep vendor
server glx vendor string: SGI
client glx vendor string: Mesa Project and SGI
OpenGL vendor string: X.Org
Xorg.0.log
http://pastebin.com/Pi1rCW5n
dmesg | grep drm
http://pastebin.com/qx7Re1fv
I am in the video group and I have no nomodeset in my boot entry.
Is this APU not yet supported for Hardware Rendering with the radeonsi drivers or do I miss anything?
Thanks in advance for any help!
Last edited by jollafan (2014-09-26 12:53:20)

glxinfo | grep vendor says very little about software / hardware rendering.
try grepping for renderer or OpenGL
$ glxinfo | grep vendor
server glx vendor string: SGI
client glx vendor string: Mesa Project and SGI
OpenGL vendor string: X.Org
$
$ glxinfo | grep renderer
GLX_MESA_multithread_makecurrent, GLX_MESA_query_renderer,
GLX_MESA_multithread_makecurrent, GLX_MESA_query_renderer,
OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD RV770
$
$ glxinfo | grep OpenGL
OpenGL vendor string: X.Org
OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD RV770
OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 10.4.0-devel (git-23247e8)
OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30
OpenGL core profile context flags: (none)
OpenGL core profile profile mask: core profile
OpenGL core profile extensions:
OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 10.4.0-devel (git-23247e8)
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30
OpenGL context flags: (none)
OpenGL extensions:
OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 10.4.0-devel (git-23247e8)
OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES 3.0
OpenGL ES profile extensions:
$

G505s are high apu and gpu temps normal during gaming?

Hi, I'm new to Lenovo laptops and new to Amd processors so need a bit of help/advice regarding my G505s with 2.5ghz A10 Apu and 5750 Gpu.
I have had this laptop about a month now and overall I'm impressed with it including its ability to play a lot of demanding games such as Battlefield 3 and even Dayz! Although the laptop runs these games on decent settings and maintaining good frame rates, it has one down side, it gets hot!
After about 20-25 minutes playing battlefield 3 on high settings the laptop gets to hot and restarts without any notice. If I turn the game settings down to medium then it is possible to play a bit longer before the laptop restarts itself. The only way I've managed to play without the laptop restarting is by going into processor power options and changing it from 100% to 99% maximum processor state. This means the Apu clock speed is reduced and it doesn't go into turbo mode. However by doing this I am losing processing power (max clock speed reduces to around 2100mhz) and the laptop still gets very hot.
Using various temp programmes I am getting Apu temps of around 90-94 degrees Celsius and the 2 gpu's are around 85-90 degrees Celsius. To me the fan doesn't seem powerful at all on my laptop and even when the laptop is really hot you can hardly feel any hot air being blown out of the vent. The keyboard on the left hand side and the case above the vent gets very hot to touch and makes using the laptop uncomfortable.
Basically I just want to know does any one else that owns this laptop experience these high temps during gaming? I also get similar temps when just streaming films over netflix although not quite as high.
I know this isn't a dedicated gaming rig so heat isn't going to be ventilated as well as it could be but these temps seem worryingly high to me and I don't want long term damage by using it running too hot.
Hope someone can help me
Cheers in advance

Update bios to 3.00 it fixes
Summary of Changes
Latest Version BIOS fixed all merged issues from previous.
83CN53WW [Problem fixes]
1. Fix CPU temperature between T1(50C)~T2(90C) does not meet the fan duty.
http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/products/laptops-and-netbooks/lenovo-g-series-laptops/lenovo-g505s-n...
Change thermalpaste to arctic mx and use coolingpad.Ive moded vents and temps are below 80C wwhile high stress.

MSI GX70-3BE Richland A10 APU and Neptune HD8970M

MSI GX70-3BE Richland A10 APU and Neptune HD8970M review by Anandtech. For people who may interested with GX70.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6949/msi-gx70-3be-richland-a10-apu-and-neptune-8970m-gaming-notebook

Quote from: LeonVolcove;94649
Dont listen to that guy, he doesn't know anything about AMD CPU(APU in this case). many people out there that buy this laptop is happily with their purchase
here is the link from amazon.com
http://www.amazon.com/MSI-Series-GX70-3BE-007US-17-3-Inch/product-reviews/B00CU9GKUS/ref=cm_cr_pr_btm_link_2?ie=UTF8&pageNumber=2&showViewpoints=0&sortBy=bySubmissionDateDescending
of course some review are bad but most are good review.
MSI GX70 is good gaming notebook for gamer who on the budget, overral performance is roughly equal to i7+780m(in some case) but for much less cost (e.g MSI GX70-3BE VS MSI GT70-20D)
guy are you using GX70 now ?

Amd a8- 4555m apu with radeon(tm) hd graphics

i just bought 1 month ago HP Pavilion 15-n276sa, but i use corel draw and its too slow
is there any chance i can uprgade my processor to better one or what should i do
(amd a8- 4555m apu with radeon(tm) hd graphics)
thank you

Hello esignshop,
Welcome to the HP Forums, I hope you enjoy your experience!
I understand that your notebook computer is behaving slowly after a month of use, and I would be happy to assist you in this matter!
Since the processor on your notebook is integrated into the motherboard, I recommend following this document on Improving System Performance without Adding Memory (Windows 8). This should help improve the speed and efficiency of your computer's system without having to replace the entire motherboard with the processor.
Please re-post with the results of your troubleshooting, and I look forward to your reply!
Regards
MechPilot
I work on behalf of HP
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!

[SOLVED] Artifacts with EXAPixmap ON and KMS with ATI OSS drivers

I had some problems for many months on my Arch Linux installation and I couldnt figure out what was causing it, so, because I found the sollution, I wanted to post it here and share it with you.
I, like others, was experiencing huge artifacts with KMS and EXAPixmaps on, on various cases, visuals and textures. After fiddling with all radeon options in xorg.conf and KMS on/off I found out thats its best for me to have KMS on (I couldnt play wine games otherwise) and EXAPixmaps off. But then again, when EXAPixmaps was off, I had poor 2D performance with KMS on, Xrender acceleration wasnt working and was falling back to software engine. Solution came from something that was brought to my attention in this topic. I ve set ARGB visuals off, raster engine for rendering and tried EXAPixmaps on.
It worked! Everything are as they supposed to be. Xrender engine and composite manager are finally working, no more artifacts. Framebuffer memory on my radeon card was somehow cleared. I then later found out an awkward solution on how to clear it by demand... Start X with vesa driver... then fix again xorg.conf back to radeon driver and reboot.
Now I have both 2D and 3D acceleration, I am logged in with KDE and have good performance. My glxgears output is 1000 to 1150 fps (vsync off) and I am using Xrender for the KDE desktop effects.
EDIT: I must clarify that I have an ATI Radeon 9200 Mobility M9+ (R200 serries)
Last edited by twilight0 (2011-05-13 20:30:27)

I 've made some more edits and this is my current xorg.conf
http://pastebin.com/x6ubG80K
I have ColorTiling set on for performance, be careful as it may be resource hungry in 3D apps but it increases dramatically fps.
You can try setting off EXAPixmaps as well and see how it goes, but then you ll have poor 2D performance and yet videos will play just fine either way.

Premiere Pro CS6: GTX 660 ti ($300) vs. GTS 450 ($100) and other thoughts on upgrading HW

I've been wanting to make some major upgrades to my hardware, but it just doesn't seem worth it yet...even after almost 4 years. I ultimately decided to "rent" a new video card and run some tests. Here is some background info on my upgrade though process and some results comparing the video card performance.
Disclaimer: I'm not a hardware expert, but I'm not completely clueless (I think). Your input/insight is welcome.
My system (purchasd 2/2009)
i7 920
GTS 450 (1GB RAM)
12 GB 1333 RAM
Samsung SATA II 128 GB SSD (OS/apps)
5x 1TB 7200 RPM drives in RAID 0 (with accompany slow/cheaper 2TB backup drives)
Some upgrade options I am considering
Sandy Bridge 3930 - but it's $560 w/o cooling and would require a new, more expensive motherboard, new ram, cooling, etc.
Ivy Bridge 3770, but I keep reading that that an overclocked 920 isn't that much different in perf (in fairness mine isn't oc'd). I did find a MB that would work for only $90. So I could make this upgrade for just under $400 (RAM would stay the same).
Wait for Haswell, but i could be another 9 months and it's supposed to only give maybe a 10% perf gain over IB. It's more focused on mobile - less power, integrated graphics, etc.
High-end Xeons are totally off the table. $/buck is waaaay too low.
Video card and benchmark reviews/problems
So I thought I'd first try getting a new video card. I see conflicting benchmarks. This site (the one that provides the CUDA.exe hack) notices very little difference between most GTX cards in perf for their benchmarks. The PPMB5 site shows significant differences between say the GTX 680 and lower end cards. But are these really accurate?
The GTX 680 is almost $500, so I opted for the 660 ti at $300 to see if I could get a noticable perf gain. It seemed like the best $/buck card and wouldn't require me to get a new power supply.
Another reason I wanted to do my own tests: None of the benchmarks I've seen actually mention the type of footage used. I care about footage from the Canon MKII-III, or similar footage. I definitely do not care about things like exporting to MPEG 2.
I did some very unscientific benchmarks, but they were real world for me. First my "problem" areas.
Performance problem areas
#1 - Time-lapses consisting of 1080 (height) JPEGs and 2160 (height) JPEGs don't always play smoothly (larger 2160s almost never do). I read adding more VRAM might help. The 660ti has 2x the RAM as my current video card.
#2 - Split screen sequences (up to 9 clips simultaneously) don't play smoothly.
#3 - Scenes where I speed up a clip to 1000x don't always play smoothly. (Although upgrading from CS5 to 6 actually seems to have solved this issue, I couldn't get it to repro any longer).
#4 - Export to h.264 could be faster. I do this a lot, but mostly because it's how I sometimes make proxies because of problems around #1-2 (works fine - used to use CineForm but it always crashed Premiere and these work for my needs). This is typically my final export as well for posting on sites like Vimeo.
#5 - Timeline rendering could be faster, although I don't do this a lot and if I do it's simple, not a bunch of crazy effects. E.g. use unsharp mask. This is pretty low pri for me though because I think timeline rendering is a bad idea. Once you do it, if you even move the clip you have to render again.
Some simple bottleneck analysis first:
Disk queue length sometimes is just over 1 on 1 disk in my RAID array during TL playback. Might slow things down slightly. Not an issue during export.
Processor never seems to get pegged in any case.
RAM is never maxed out, but it starts to go to Premiere limits (10 GB that I've set) after playing through several time-lapses (I'm just now noticing this). Choppiness starts well before RAM is even near that on some clips.
Tests/results:
NOTE: I do run the 660ti in a PCIe 2 x16 slot. Let me know if you think it would even matter to run in a PCIe 3.0 slot. My MB doesn't have one.
#1 Time-lapse smoothness - didn't improve with the 660. Moving the 1080 size JPEG TLs to my SSD did help some problem TLs play smoothly however.
#2 Split screen. Did a test with a 9-clip-at-the-same-time sequence. No improvement with the 660ti.
#3 Clips speed up 1000x - could not repro the problem now that I run CS 6 vs. 5 on either card.
#4 - Export to H.264 1080p @23.9x fps.
Export 5:30 clip of 5D MKIII footage + H.264 proxies:
GTS 450 - 9:14
660 Ti - 8:30
Export 1.5 minute clip of large time-lapses (JPEGs that are 2160 high):
GTS 450 - 9:35
660 Ti - 7:00
Export a 2 minute clip of just MKIII footage
GTS 450 - 2:45
660 Ti - 2:45
#5 Timeline render with simple image correction effect
Timeline render short 5D MKIII clip with unsharp mask applied:
GTS 450 - 1:10
660 Ti - 1:19
Conclusion:
The 660ti ($300) showed marginal improvements in exporting h.264 against my GTS 450 ($100) and did not address my other issues. Definitely not worth it for the type of work I do.
Moving my time-lapse JPEGs to an SSD helps play the 1080p versions back smoothly. The 2160p larger versions still lag. Maybe more RAM would help? They still start off choppy and then acquire more and more RAM, so not sure here. Maybe faster 1600 RAM? I don't know, I doubt it. I may have to just use 1080 versions or make proxies.
I don't see a pegged CPU much if at all, so upgrading to an Ivy Bridge 3770 doesn't seem like it'll help much if at all.
I did end up buying 2x256 GB SATA III SSDs (only $169 each) that I'll run current projects off of, or at least time-lapse sequences (RAID 0). My motherboard doesn't have an SATA III slots, however, so I won't see the full power of these, but not sure I'll need it. Again I'm not seeing a clear disk issue either from the perf monitoring.
I suspect many of these problems are still with the software and how it takes advantage of my hardware, but I'd love more insight.
Generally I make things work and I don't have any really painful bottlenecks, but I'm always up for perf improvements/doing things faster. It does look like I won't see any major breakthroughs, however by spending $400-$1000 bucks on HW upgrades.
Thoughts?
Luke
Blog | Photography | Vimeo

Thanks for the resonpose Harm. Inline.
Harm Millaard wrote: SYSTEM: It is an older system, about the same I had in the form of 'Harm's Beast', although I have a much beefier disk setup, more memory and OC'ed to 3.7 GHz, in combination with a GTX 480. Not much you can do about this system, apart from upgrading memory to 24 GB but the major drawback is that those investments will not carry over to a new system, at least not easily. [Luke] From your description of your system it sounds like 4 things could indeed be upgraded and carried over to a new system. 1) OC the processor (e.g. purchase a generic water cooler for ~$100), 2) Improve the Disk setup, 3) Upgrade the video card, 4) Add more/faster RAM.
I've seen in some benchmarks that an OC'd 920 is not so dissimilar to an OC'd 3770K. The latter is faster, but it isn't a huge difference. The larger question still remains - will any/all of these upgrades yield large performance gains and solve all/a higher percentage of my problems? Or do I have a decent sweet spot of a system and should wait for the software (e.g. MPE evolution in CS7-8) to catch up and take better advantage of what I have? Like I said from doing some rudimentary performance monitoring, I'm not seeing a pegged CPU (just a brief spike here/there), I'm not seeing disk transfer at capacity (although 1 disk has a slightly > 1 queue length at times), I'm not seeing in all cases over-utilization of memory, etc. (except higher RAM usage is seen albeit staggered for large JPEG time-lapse sequences, but I see choppiness well before RAM usage gets to 10 GB).
VIDEO: You correctly point out that the GTX 680 shows in the MPE graph on the PPBM5 website much better results than other cards. But keep in mind that most 680's are used in new systems, often with the latest CPU's and fast memory. I'm convinced that a 680 is not noticeably faster than a 580, because they have the same memory bandwidth, but it looks that way because they are often accompanied by hexa core i7-39xx CPU's with large amounts of memory. [Luke] Good point - potentially further evidence that the video card doesn't make a big difference? At least not enought to justify 5x the cost (e.g. $500 680 vs. $100 450). This would be consistnet with what Studio 1 Productions has seen. The GTS 450 has a memory bandwidth of 86 GB/s, the 660 Ti has 144.2 GB/s, so the latter is significantly faster as you have shown in some of your tests. [Luke] The only test I would characterize closer to having a significant increase using the 660 would be exporting large JPEG time-lapses to H.264, where it was a good 27% faster. The rest seemed more marginal or did not change. TESTING: You don't mention to what format you exported and with what resolution and framerate. Hardware MPE will come into play when you have rescaling, frame blending, blurring and stuff like that occurring. If you export to the same frame size and frame rate as your source and no blurring occurs, then exporting is purely a CPU matter and the video card has no impact at all. [Luke] See above - H.264, 1080p @23.9x fps. General remarks: I personally consider your 5 disk raid0 setup as pretty risky. You have multiplied the risk of losing all data by a factor 5!. You have no redundancy at all. Even though it is fast, I expect your sustained transfer rates are less than 450 MB/s and when using a 9 clip split screen, it may be too slow with the limited memory and the old CPU you have. You have effectively one single volume for video related editing (apart from the OS disk) and while that makes for easy administration, it still entails the drawbacks of the half-duplex connection of SATA. It might be better to add a couple of HDD's in raid0 for media cache, previews and exports to avoid that limitation. You can always carry those to a new system. [Luke] Yes there is a higher level of risk, but with backups every 30 minutes during project work I yield cheap/easy perf gains for the cost of--at most--30 minutes of work. I've lost no work in the last 4 years, 1 drive failed once while on vacation and I replaced it easily. Anyway backup/data integrity is a different issue separate from performance which I'd like to focus on in this context.
I get ~420MB/s read with this array (mostly older, blue WD drives and Deskstars). I'm running out of space, so I just ordered 3 x 2 TB WD black drives to replace this with, expecting probably a similar transfer rate. Again though I'm not necessarily seeing disk being a bottleneck in perf mon aside from one disk who's queue length sometimes goes over 1, so we'll see if the newer black drives help.
I have ordered 2x256 SATA III SSDs to put min my time-lapses on as having them on my current primary SSD seemed to help in some cases.
Sorry to be so harsh. [Luke] No worries, harsh is OK but I'm still not seeing a clear solution to some of my issues and I'm still not convinced a new system - short of a top-of-the-line SB or Xeon system (both of which are very $$) will be worth the upgrade. When 5 years had passed between my current system and my 2004 system, I feel like the upgrades were much more significant especially for bang/$.
Luke Humphrey
Blog | Photography | Cinematography

Trouble with Office 2013 and KMS activation.

I have a KMS server running on Server 2008 R2 that was serving out activations for Windows 7 and Office 2010. I ran the Office 2013 activation
pack on the KMS server and now it also shows our KMS key for Office 15. I realize that I need a minimum of 5 in the count field in order for activations to happen.
We use VMware VDI and I spun up a pool of 10 with Office 2013 installed on the master. Before creating the desktop clones, I rearmed the master and then shut it down, snapped it and created the desktop clones. I have logged onto most of the clones
with a number of different user IDs and when I look at the KMS server it now shows that the count is 9 - so I would assume that my copies are being activated. However, when I look at Office on the VDI clones or on my own personal computer that has 2013
installed I see that the product still needs to be activated.
Yes we have the VL service record in DNS pointing to the right server - it's been there for ages taking care of Windows and Office 2010. I did not have this issue with either of the other products and KMS. I am at a loss as to what
to do next.
Thanx...

check the client-side event logs for the SPP events (request/response), is the client (your pc for example), hitting the expected KMShost, and what response resulted?
Also check the KMShost event logs, is the request from your pc arriving there, and what came in, and went back as a response?
If you're not familiar with how to "decode" the events, check here:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee939272.aspx
In case you have a "rogue" KMShost:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/odsupport/archive/2011/11/14/how-to-discover-kms-hosts-via-a-dns-query-and-remove-them-if-need-be.aspx
EDIT: PS, not that it matters for this question, but there is a dedicated forum for OFF2013:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=officesetupdeploy :)
Don
(Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

Mupen64plus on intel w/ dri2 and kms

well i can't play any games into mupen and i'm really out of clues, the only thing i'm getting from running in console is the following output
http://paste-it.net/public/je2cbc9/
so if anyone could help me i would then be happily playing
btw i use a 945gms w/ dri2 uxa and kms enabled, w/ no xorg.conf

I think I know what the problem is ...
So you have Mac OS 10.5.1 ... that's Darwin 9.
But your dev tools came with Darwin 8 ... 10.4. I mean, what's going on is that the linker is trying to link the System.dylib to your code using the Darwin 8 System.dylib. It opens the dylib, but hates what it finds in the Mach-O _TEXT_ section.
So, I bet you had a 10.4 machine, installed the 10.4 dev tools at some point, upgraded the machine to 10.5, but you haven't yet installed the 10.5 dev tools.
My bet is that if you install the 10.5 dev tools, you should be okay. Woolamaloo uses the same C code ... and it does compile in 10.5 using the 10.5 dev tools. Honest.

Today I stupidly tried to install CUDA accelerator forgetting I have Intel/AMD combo graphics card and not NVidia. Now when I try to launch AE or PremierePro I get this Last log message was: 140735120521568 GPUManager 2 Sniffer Result Code: 3 Help

Today I stupidly tried to install CUDA accelerator forgetting I have Intel/AMD combo graphics card and not NVidia. Now when I try to launch AE or PremierePro I get this Last log message was: <140735120521568> <GPUManager> <2> Sniffer Result Code: 3. I have trashed the CUDA program and reinstalled Premiere and AE but no joy. Same message followed by another error box with options to Retry, Send to Apple or ignore. I have tried all 3 options but nothing works! Every time I launch either program same message appears.

Hi? today i too have this problem.
I found a solution here: https://discussions.apple.com/message/25137524#25137524
Now all good.
Good luck!

Windows 8 64bit not compatible w/ AMD Athlon 64 processor and/or ASUS A8N-SLI motherboard.

Why should I have to go through a plethora of troubleshooting techniques, then have to settle for using the Windows 8/ 32bit install CD, when I have a 64bit system? I think it's probably something in the Windows
8 /64bit code that causes it to fail install w/ AMD Athlon 64bit processor, and/or my ASUS A8N-SLI motherboard. After a lot of hassle I tried the Windows 8 /32bit CD and that seems to work fine. My real question is, why should I have to settle
for 32bit on a 64bit system?

I had the same experience trying to install Window 8 Pro 64bit (Build 9200) on an old XP SP3 32bit system, but I somehow got it working; the full story.
I had two XP Sp3 32 bit systems I wanted to upgrade to Window 8 Pro 64 bit (with the $40 upgrade deal available now). System#1 is: I7 920/Asus P6T deluxe/EVGA 560Ti/3GB/1 TB SATA 300 drive/1.44 Floppy/ 12X Bluray burner (pulled the old TV tuner card for
upgrade-incompatible). I ran the Windows 8 upgrade advisor - very few issues (TV Tuner card as mentioned and other software) - bought the upgrade. Downloaded the upgrade from my Win7Pro 64bit system to obtain the 64bit ISO (2.69GB) - burned to DVD. Installed
from DVD; no problems, finished in under 20 minutes - working great (really fast boot!).
System#2 is: Opteron 180/Asus A8N-E/EVGA 275GTX/2GB/1 TB SATA 300 drive/ 1.44 Floppy/ 16X DVD RW burner; the Windows 8 upgrade advisor - more incompatible software than system#1, but no incompatible hardware. I had read a number of blogs concerning the issues
others were having with the upgrade failing, so before I purchased, I thought I would run the 64bit install DVD I had (known to work on the other system) to see if it worked. I should note this system was not-in-use and thus I was not worried if the install
failed (I'd just be annoyed!). Ran the install from the DVD; initial splash screen - no spinning dots - waited 15 minutes (by which time no activity on DVD or hard drive) - failure. Rebooted - entered bios (1010) - tried many combinations of settings up to
disabling nearly everything (NVRAID, Legacy USB, Floppy, Audio97- all disabled / moved SATA into every slot (1-4) / tried SATA 150 and SATA 300 (SATA2, slots 3-4) - no change - failure X4 attempts. Now original XP3 installation is corrupted (GRRRR!) - I should
have imaged the drive BEFORE - oh well. Read more about others experience with this seemingly NForce board-related issue. Plan B - I will try install with an IDE (PATA) hard drive (80GB) - failure. Read more - some mention Window 8 installer not "liking" XP
partitions / disks (???); Plan C - Re-partition / format / check 80 GB IDE drive with WDTools - attempted Win8Pro install - failure. Dejected; last attempt before considering Win8Pro 32bit - Plan D - Re-partition / format / check 1 TB SATA 300 drive with SeaTools
(Barracuda 32GB buffer-7200rpm) - run Win8PRO 64bit install from DVD (build 9200) - success! Install took nearly an hour, with 3 reboots to the finish. Specifics (install configuration): 1 TB SATA drive in Slot 4 (SATA2), upgraded memory to 4GB Corsair PC3200
(4 slots filled), Two DVD drives on Primary IDE channel (master and slave), secondary IDE channel - no devices, bios (1010) - NVRAID, Audio97,1394 port,LAN -disabled; USB 2.0, USB Legacy, Floppy - enabled, IDE-Auto), TrendNet USB wireless adapter on USB slot
2 (motherboard), EVGA 275GTX in PCIe slot 1, no other cards. System seems to be performing well (fast boot times, no hangs), but as noted, no sound (I actually forgot to re-enable the Audio97 device in bios; it was 2am). I will see if I can get the Audio97
enabled today; my backup is to add a Turtle Beach Montego DDL PCI card (with the Windows7 64bit driver and run in compatiblity mode). Hope this saga might help some others out - good luck.

AMD E-450 APU and KMS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for