Amount wrong pick in MIRO

Hi Experts,
We are doing MIRO against a Purchase order. The FI document is genrated
001 89  GMOH 601235     GSM FWP CWIP                             2,352,190.00
002 96  GMOH 600086     WRX - GR/IR CLRNG AC                          2,328,140.00-
003 50  GMOH 500348     NCCD-CUSTOME DUTY                            24,050.00-
the Above document in INR.
But in MIRO part the  system pick the GR/IR amount is 42329.82 in USD. 
Debit - 42329.82                        Credit- 51000                       balance- 8670.18
please advice.
Regards
Aditya

Hi Experts,
In GRN No.5000110596 GR/IR Account in system is credited with $ 51000 but while processing the bill using T-Code MIRO, GR/IR Account is getting debited with $ 42329.82. There is difference in both figures.
Waiting for your reply

Similar Messages

  • How to enter condition wise tax amount manually in MIR7 & MIRO?

    We have a PO with a tax code entered in it.
    but while parking invoice in MIR7, we want to enter condition wise tax amount manully which is different than calculated tax amount through tax code and subsequently we want the same manual tax amount to be displayed in MIRO also
    I tried to enter amount for each condition in 'Detail' screen of 'Tax' tab in MIR7,
    but at the time of simulating, amount calculated as per tax code is only shown and not the amount entered by me
    'Calculate Tax' checkbox is not selectd in this case.
    Can anybody tell me how to enter condition wise tax amount manully in MIR7 & MIRO and post an accounting entry with this manually entered tax amount?

    Hi,
    i checked their is no unplanned delivery cost and in FV13 tax is 12.5%. In FTXP No Tax Percent rates.
    Regards
    Mahesh

  • Amount is splitting in MIRO Doc

    Hi
    I did MIRO for one document. Its of Rs.5000
    When i say MIRO document, amount was splitted as follows:
    1     000001     86          14102002     GR/IR-CLRNG SERIVCES          5,000.00
    2     000002     31          14101001     PAYABLES - DOMESTIC          4,455.00-
    3     000003     31          14101001     PAYABLES - DOMESTIC      247.00-
    4     000004     31          14101001     PAYABLES - DOMESTIC          248.00-
    5     000005     50          14403001     TDS U/S 194 C (SUB-C         45.00-
    6     000006     50          14403001     TDS U/S 194 C (SUB-C         3.00-
    7     000007     50          14403001     TDS U/S 194 C (SUB-C         2.00-
    Let me know the reason on what basis this amount is split ?

    >
    Deepak Agrawal wrote:
    > Hi
    >
    > I did MIRO for one document. Its of Rs.5000
    >
    > When i say MIRO document, amount was splitted as follows:
    >
    > 1     000001     86          14102002     GR/IR-CLRNG SERIVCES          5,000.00
    > 2     000002     31          14101001     PAYABLES - DOMESTIC          4,455.00-
    > 3     000003     31          14101001     PAYABLES - DOMESTIC      247.00-
    > 4     000004     31          14101001     PAYABLES - DOMESTIC          248.00-
    > 5     000005     50          14403001     TDS U/S 194 C (SUB-C         45.00-
    > 6     000006     50          14403001     TDS U/S 194 C (SUB-C         3.00-
    > 7     000007     50          14403001     TDS U/S 194 C (SUB-C         2.00-
    >
    > Let me know the reason on what basis this amount is split ?
    Invoiced vendor is liable for TDS deduction for contracting which is maintained in vendor master.
    Check it in withholding tax tab of MIRO in which
    TDS tax code is flowing if it is then TDS amounts will be caculated for every bill amount
    mentioned in invoice(MIRO).
    Hope it solves query.

  • Wrong PAyment Term Picked During MIRO

    Hello,
    I have an issue,
    1) I create PO .
    2) Then do MIGO and assign DELIVERY NOTE Feild .
    3) Then Further I create a MIRO giving DELIVERY NOTE feild as 'PO REFRERNCE' .
    NOw During MIRO its picking Wrong PAYMENT TERM.
    I checked Vendor master for PAYMENT TERM its maintained properly.
    I even checked OBB8 for proper assignment of Payment Terms.
    Eg For Vendor -123 Payment Term assigned is '3000'
    in PO its picking 3000
    but During MIRO it gives Incorrect Value '9000'
    Kindly suggest.
    Thanks & Regards,

    In MRM_PAYMENT_TERM
    Payment term feild (ZTERM) is not Export parameter,how can we Use this..
    It picks wrong payment term when Delivery note is selected During MIRO for 'PO Reference'
    If he uses PO number it gives correct payment term..
    Regards,

  • Miro Rark tax amount wrong calculate

    Hi
    1.I am Miro Directly posting But tax amount correct calculated.
    2.Miro parked document posted tax amount wroung calculater.
    please help on this issues i need urnent .full posined assigned
    Regards
    YSr

    Hi,
    Please post IV through MIR6 transaction by selecting option as given below :
    Regards,
    Tejas

  • TAXES NOT PICKED IN MIRO

    Hi all,
    THERE IS PO WTIH FOLLOWING SCENARIO
              Amount(inr)    
    PO    100  + 16.48 ( TAXES-EXCISE ) = 116.48
    GR    100  + 12.00 ( TAXES-EXCISE ) =  112
    while doing MIRO system should pick the taxes from MIGO.but it is picking from PO.
    when we do MIRO with refrence to PO if taxes are overwritten in MIGO the values are picked from MIGO or J1IEX.

    Hi manish
    Maintain your tax code for MMIV in transaction OBZT.
    Also check
    Assign the tax code to the company code in the below path...
    SPRO>Logistics General>Tax on Goods Movement>India->Basic Setting>Determination of Excise Duty>Condition Based Excise Determination>Assign tax code to company code.
    After this run MIRO.
    Vishal...
    Reward if usefull

  • Wrong Vendor in MIRO

    Hi Experts,
    We have faced a problem where we have posted miro in wrong vendor code whereas actual vendor in PO was different. How it happened, how it can be controlled. Is there any system message available to control this.
    Full points for helping answers.
    Regards
    GR

    Hi,
      If you have done the invoice w.r.to PO, it would have picked the correct vendor. So, delete the invoice in tcode MR8M and do invoice w.r.to PO again.
    Regards,
    Prasath

  • Service Tax condition not picking during MIRO

    Hi,
    Referring earlier posted thread,
    http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2135441&tstart=0
    I want to know insert a Tax Code - VAT for 10% and a Condition Type - Service Tax for 10.3%...
    During MIRO, Service Tax Amount is not Picking... Why???
    There is any solution for it.....

    Hi,
    If we create Service condition type, then why need to create Tax code in FTXP and maintain in FV11...
    Why both things need to create...??
    No need to maintain
    check for your service tax condition type
    Cond. class   A Discount or
    Calculat.type A percentage
    Cond.category B Delivery co
    and you have accrual tick for your condition in t-code M/06
    also check in your pricing procedure you have assign account key and accrual key for your condition type in t-code
    M/08
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Base value & excise amount during MRP MIGO & MIRO

    Excise base amount & excise values are calulated & put during MRP based MIGO & similar process is again done during MIRO.Can't this duplicacy be avoided.
    Hitesh Chaturvedi

    Hi
    You have to calculate excise base value during MIGO as well as MIRO because both these activities are done by different departments.
    Some times the value calculated during MIGO is wrong and is corrected by excise dept during part2 posting in J1IEX as well.
    So u cant avoid it doing twice

  • J1INMIS : Correct amount not picked while challn printing

    Dear Gurus,
    I am facing problem while running tcode J1INMIS for Challan Update Status.
    When I am running the transaction system is showing INR 178 amount against WHT tax code CC . which I can see in the accounting document also. but while updating challan, system is showing another amount INR 3,270 which is a service tax amount.
    Can anybody suggest why system is behaving like that.
    Thanks in advance
    Rupesh Kumar Singh

    Dear GB,
    Providing the accounting document and the WHT figure for your reference
    Accounting Entry passed by the system where you will see the TDS amount is 874/-
    HNGL 1 31 3200000589 hariom Logistics Pvt Ltd 37,676.00-
    HNGL 2 70 21200000     000081000203 0000      38,550.00
    HNGL 3 50 14351000     TDS a/c contractors       874.00-
    HNGL 4 50 14360000     S.Tax on Inward Fght     964.00-
    HNGL 5 40 25402400     S T  Receivable-GTA      964.00
    HNGL 6 50 14360100     E.Cess on Inward Fgh      20.00-
    HNGL 7 40 25402500     EC on ST  Rec - GTA        20.00
    HNGL 8 50 14360200     HS EC on Inward Fgh       10.00-
    HNGL 9 40 25402600     HS EC on ST Rec-GTA     10.00
    J1INMIS
    Doc. No.       Sec      Posting Dt.   Sec Cd.        W.Tax CD  W.Tax amt        Payment due Dt.   Base Amount
    76004300    194C    31.03.2009 ;  RISR             CC             874.00-             31.05.2009 ;          38,550.00-
    After pressing Challan update button
    Doc No.         Ref. No.                            Doc Type       Doc. Date     PK                  BA               INR Gross
    76004300 5926              R2 07.02.2009 50 RSR 964.00-
    Here you can see it is appearing 964/-  i.e service tax.
    I am unable to understand why system is showing right value but at the time of posting it is picking wrong value for some cases.
    Hope above description will help you to understand the problem.

  • Excise Amount Doesnt Apperar in MIRO.

    I am simulating Excise amount in MIRO but it doesnt show Cenvat Clearing amount Why Eventhough
    1 J1id is maintained Properly.
    2 In migo Excise Is showing.
    3 Checkbox is ticked with preper tax code.
    4 I/P OP Maintained In j1id.
    Kindly Suggest.
    I have checked all likns in SDN + service marketplace But dint get any link.
    Edited by: Pritesh kumar on May 29, 2011 4:30 PM

    Pritesh kumar wrote:
    In j_1iexchdr-Status is P.
    > & here Part 1 is only posted.
    >
    > Material Type is Raw Matrerial.
    >
    > EX GRP     Reg Type = C      2011
    >
    > Edited by: Pritesh kumar on May 29, 2011 7:04 PM
    User might have selected wrong material type in excise invoice ?,which effected wrong register ?
    If possible cancel material document,post excise invoice using J1IEX,cancel excise invoice with reversal reason.
    Then capture excise invoice(ensure correct material type is selected),refer it in GR,post excise invoice.
    Now do invoice(MIRO),ensure correct tax code(NON CG) is selected.
    Hope it solves problem.

  • Excise Amount not capturing in MIRO

    Hi
    Excise amount is not being captured in MIRO. Case is that a GR has been reversed with 102 and then new GR was made but when user is trying to do Invoice Verification then he is not getting the MODVAT values there.
    Please suggest what shall we do.
    Thanks in advance
    Pankaj

    Hi,
    Assign the excise and CENVAT accounts to GL Accounts.
    Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Account Determination > Specify G/L Accounts
    per Excise Transaction
    When you come to execute the various transactions, the system determines which G/L accounts to post to by looking at the:
    Excise group
    Company code
    Chart of accounts
    Furthermore, if you want separate account determination settings within an excise group, you can also use sub transaction types.
    Requirements
    You have already:
    Defined the G/L accounts
    Defined the excise groups
    Maintained the transaction accounts
    Activities
    For each excise group, assign the excise and CENVAT accounts to G/L accounts. For most businesses, one set of accounts will suffice for all transactions.
    Check and ensure the above IMG activities.
    Regards,
    G Bhaskaran

  • Commitment item not picking while MIRO posting for Service entry sheet

    Hi to all,
    We have activated Fund Management in middle of the year where there were purchase order completed to till MIGO. When we do MIRO now system unable to pick commitment item from FMDERIVE.
    We have created Commitment item as 50/3 combination ( No budget check ) and assigned to GR/IR clearing account.
    We also activated trace in FMDERIVE and checked MIRO  posting and found that derivation is working properly but while posting it is triggering error.
    Some one advise me as it affected daily activities.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Y.Kiran Babu

    Hi,
    For the purchase order completed and the related MIGO created before FM was implemented, you need to run FMCN and FMCT.
    I will explain to you in detail all the information related to the matter.
    First of all, it seems to be in your PO that does not have FM account assignment (funds center and commitment item) in account assignment TAB. In addition, the error occurs usually also because in your SES the FM account assignment is missing.
    For GR and IR documents FM always takes the major part of the FM account assignment from the PO.
    You can fill these account assignments by using the programs RFFMCHAN/RFFMCHAT.
    FMCN/FMCT must be run for the first document in the chain, which is the PO in case you don't have a PR assigned to this PO or an earmarked fund document. If you have PR's assigned to the PO's please run FMCN/FMCT for the PR first.
    When executing the FMCT transaction, ALL documents selected in one group must be tested and processed successfully TOGETHER. If any one document fails, the ENTIRE group is shown as in error.
    Therefore, first step is to ensure that the reference PO has a valid FM account assignment and is updated in FM. This should be done by FMCN/FMCT and subsequent posting with FMN4N (see reconstruction note 189761).
    The SES itself might not be changed by FMCT. Therefore you should fulfill the FM account assignments in SES manually or with a custom program.
    Please check also your table FM01X. As an alternative solution, you can enable one of these flags in table FM01X, depending on your business needs:
    FLG_PO_PROTECT if you want to always inherit the fm account assignment from the reference PO and therefore skip FMDERIVE
    FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE if you always want to force a call to fmderive in all cases
    FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in services, if you wish to overwrite the account assignment from the SES with the derived values from FMDERIVE.
    You can find more information about it in text part of notes 1146677 and 923672.
    FMDERIVE is skipped for GR/IR lines and the Commitment item is inherited from the PO regardless of whether or not the GR/IR line is FM relevant. This is SAP standard behavior.
    If you want to force the Commitment item to be derived from the GL account for the GR/IR line, you can use the FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE flag as described in note 923672.  This will allow FMDERIVE to be called for these lines.  Please be sure to fully test this to ensure that FM account assignments that you do not want to be overwritten are not incorrectly derived.
    Bear in mind that for PO´s that does not have account assignment you should run FMCN/FMCT + FMN4N. For this you would need to check the flags and which one is more related to your needs. With the appropriate flag marked in FM01X (active with X) you should be able to run the transactions without any issue.
    Based on note 189761, after doing all the previous suggestions and the issue does not appear anymore, I suggest you to run the following programs:
    1) FMN0 for this PO/GR to see if the actual values are correct in FM table FMIFIIT (FM actual line items).
    2) Run report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF). The reconstruction programs always update the totals records in Funds Management. Therefore, you do not normally need to reconstruct the totals records.  However, if you suspect there are data inconsistencies in the totals records, you can analyze and correct these using the report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF).
    If you correct the totals records, you must do this before you reconstruct the assigned values (see below).
    3) Run reconstruction for AVC
    You can also reconstruct the assigned values using the following tools:
        o  Report BPINDX03 (transaction FMBV) for former budgeting
        o  Report RFFMAVC_REINIT (transaction FMAVCREINIT) for the Budget
           Control System (BCS)
    Make sure that no other system activities (postings, budgeting) are carried out during a reconstruction (commitment/actual or assigned values).
    I believe that this resolve your inquiry.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • Packaging charge amount not appearing in miro

    Dear Friends,
    I am working on SAP 4.7, One material PO is made with a customized condition type Y004 (Packaging charge (%)) - 2% And freight 2%, and after GR it was found that separate line item is appearing for freight 2% as DCGR BUT same is not appearing for the case of packaging charge due to which at the time of MIRO packaging charge amount is showing as NIL in the line item whereas freight value appearing correctly. I have also checked whether the packaging charge is getting added in the total value or not and found it is nowhere added.
    Please let me know how to correct this problem

    Details maintained against condition Y004 (packaging charge)
    Cond. class   A Discount or surcharge     
    Plus/minus    A Positive
    Calculat.type A Percentage
    Cond.category B Delivery costs
    Manual entries C Manual entry has priority
    Header condition Tick yes
    Item condition   Tick yes
    Delete           Tick yes
    Amount/Percent   Tick Yes
    delete fr. DB    Do Not delete(set the deletion)
    Scale basis      C quantity scale
    Currency conv   Tick Yes
    Accruals        Tick yes
    I have checked in GR FI document also and found that all the other amount except packaging charges appearig correctly.
    Kindly help.

  • Excise taxes are not picking in MIRO

    Hi,
    Hello,
    We are creating the Imorted PO with Tick of Gr based IV in PO.
    And created the Inbound delivery for line item of the PO.
    After this we were go for MIGO with ref to PO.
    And created the MIGO.
    We will pay the Customs duty later.. some special accounts head will pay him monthly.
    my question is... In MIRO(layout is planned delivery cost) with ref to PO..... Qty and Amount field is blank.
    For one line item of PO,,, we need to enter 7 conditions value in MIRo.... suppose if the PO is having the more than 10 line item. we need to enter 70 conditions..... it may make error....
    we want that system should take the values automatically in MIRO
    regards
    sapman man

    hi,
    in import case u r verifing the invoice of customes before u make the GRN dtas why it is blank.
    again
    as currency rate keep on changing so it is not advisible to copy the PO value because that will not match to customs invoice.
    u need to key in the values manually only.
    u can develope one BDC for this if u require and entries are more.
    regards,
    sujit

Maybe you are looking for