Another 3G Data speed problem on 4.1

Hi All,
Background info first:
Using Win 7 Ultimate, iPhone 3gs 16gb, iTunes 10.0.0.68
Located in Milton, Ontario, Canada (near Toronto), Rogers Cell network
While my iPhone was on os 4.0, everything worked perfectly, I was getting 5 bars of service almost anywhere I was, and the 3g data was almost always fast (about 99% of the time it worked without an issue). On rare occasions my signal strength would dip to 4 bars, but that was the worst of it.
I then upgraded to ios 4.0.2, and things have been downhill from there. My 3g speeds are generally terrible now, I usually get 1 or 2 bars, occasionally I will get 3 bars, and only once have I seen 4 bars. Needless to say, I can't really get online with much reliability anymore.
I then noticed an update and upgraded to 4.1, things are even worse now. My geocaching app refuses to connect to the gps, it just hangs, and I am frequently missing phone calls (phone doesn't even ring, I just get a text telling me I missed a call). Battery life is all over the map now as well, some nights I will go to bed with battery at 100%, and when I get up it is at 88%, other times it has completely drained.
I contacted Apple, they told me about the problem where the signal strength wasn't being reported properly, and now I am just seeing what my true signal strength is. I don't buy that at all, because if that is the case, then if my phone was showing 5 bars, and I was actually only getting 2 bars, I was still able to get really fast speeds, now that it is "correctly" showing 2 bars, I am getting terrible reception. Apple support suggested I contact an apple store and book an appointment.
Went to apple store, met with the genius bar guy, he was really helpful, he thought it might be my sim card, so he gave me a new sim card, and then he decided he might as well give me a new phone in case it was the device, new phone came with os 4.0.2, so the only thing that really fixed was the geocaching app, but to get all of my contacts back, I had to restore from a backup, and I am back at 4.1, and no data speed.
I contacted my cell carrier, and they can't figure it out either (one of the reps even told me to jailbreak my phone so I could downgrade to an earlier os).
My mother in law has an ipad, on the same carrier, and she lives way out in the middle of the countryside. She gets 5 bars at her house, I get no service.
Just wondering what people think is the issue, is it phone + os, or is it network?
My thought is that it is the new os, my wife has the same phone with os 4.0, but on a different carrier, and she always gets 5 bars of strength.
Thanks
Mike

Hi mlethbridge
to clarify, I am not interested in jailbreaking the phone at all, I was just shocked that a customer service rep actually suggested I do that.
Yes you have to wonder sometimes
When I first contacted apple customer support, they told me to try restoring from a backup, did that but no change, then I restored to a new state, but I was still getting the 3g speed problems.
When I received the new phone from apple, I did check the data speed, and it was still slow.
So was it just slow or so slow that it was timing out before it would load anything?
The geocaching app problem has been solved, I don't know why, but when I checked in Location Services, geocaching was turned off, that was a real simple fix (boy I feel like an idiot on that one), but that obviously didn't help the 3g speed.
Yes, I wish sometimes all things were that easy to fix.
As for the contacts, I always just kept them on my phone, count that as a lesson learned, they have all been synced over to my computer now.
Good to hear, I would hate to see a post saying 'all contacts lost how do I get them back?'
I personally treat my phone a portable storage device and never have anything on it that I cannot afford to loose.
The point I was making with the iPad comparison is that my mother in law and I should be getting almost identical speeds (I am aware that the antenna might be a bit different in the iPad, but it shouldn't make that much of a difference), so I am not sure if it is just the way my cell network interacts with the new firmware, or if it is just the new firmware itself (if that makes sense?)
I know what you mean, I'm not sure of the specs of the ipad v 3GS, but yes I would expect them to be reasonably similar.
I did a bit more testing today, and went for quite a drive out to my brothers, the closest cell tower to him is about 5kms away (from my house it is about 1 km), and I was actually getting 4 and 5 bars out there, and the data speed was pretty good (not as good as I was used to, but it was a speed I could live with), but back at my house, I am getting only 1 bar again.
On the surface of things, it sounds like its working as it should, all be it a bit slow maybe.
I am really waffling as to which is at fault, is it the firmware or my cell network.
I was recently discussing a roughly similar issue with another user where his connection on 3G was timing out Unfortunately we could not determine if it was firmware or carrier in the end, his problem just evaporated and his data just suddenly came good, which was great for him, but a bit frustrating for everyone as the cause was never found.
In that case everything was attempted. You can read about here http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2570292 if you are interested.
Try a few things;
Make sure that you have the latest carrier setting file. It is possible that with the new 4.1 firmware, this file also requires updating. I know my carrier updated their's (Telstra Australia) after the upgrade.
This should be an automatic thing, but it doesn't hurt to check. Connect your phone to iTunes and check for updates. If there is a carrier update available you will prompted to download it. Alternately, in the iphone go to Settings > General > About and if there is an update available, you will be prompted to downloading.
I think that you want to determine is just what speed are you getting.
My first step would to download a speed checker app, I use Speedtest.net app, but any free tester will do and use it to test your download and upload speeds. Compare this with different locations within your house and also where you are showing a much stronger signal. You will probably find that it varies a bit depending on your location.
See if you can compare it with another iphone on the same firmware, same network, same location, or compare it with the ipad, but I think it would be better with another iphone.
What happens if you turn off 3G and access only by Edge, speeds will drop because Edge is slower, but by how much? And WIFI, what is data like on it?
What happens if you restore to 'new' and just sync the speed tester app. Does that resolve anything? This will determine if something else in the background is causing the issue.
On that though, what other apps do you have running at the same time that could cause a slowdown? Mail? Facebook? Streaming Music? If multiple apps are running that require internet connection and then you open Safari to browse all the apps share the connection speed between them, so it could appear that the internet connection is slow.
Hope this helps a little

Similar Messages

  • My IPhone 3G reception fixed, a new problem - AT&T *real* data speeds

    I've read quite a few topics on this forum regarding the poor IPhone 3G reception, and unfortunately 99% of them are emotions, making it very laborious to distill useful info out of them.
    Therefore I'd like to post my personal experience so far with IPhone 3g, listing more facts, than emotions. *I hope this will help some of you, and also hope that others will follow a more structured approach to reporting IPhone 3g problems*.
    *IPhone 3G Model MB046LL, 2.0.1 firmware*
    I got my IPhone 3g black 16gb version in NJ on August 2nd, model MB046LL. I work in IT, and I was overall very impressed with all of its features. However, the device had 2 major problems - 3g reception was highly unstable, and the actual 3g data speeds were far lower than advertised, 200kb on average for download and 30kb on average for upload.
    I called AT&T, they said I was in the zone with "the best 3g coverage". I went to an AT&T store, and had my SIM card swapped from #3022 to a newer one, #4022. Swapping the SIM card drastically improved both 3g reception and the data speeds.
    Unfortunately, I noticed that my IPhone 3g was picking up not as many bars of 3g as other Iphone 3g sitting next to me. The actual dbm numbers for 3g were also smaller. I would continue having dropped calls. I also noticed that my battery would fully recharge very fast (within 1.3 hours), and would fully discharge much faster than it was advertised. The GPS was acting weird, and the voice quality would sometimes be horrible even with 5 bars of 3g. There were more anomalies with that phone, e.g. download speed of 20-30kb with 5 bars of 3g, among other things. I would diligently take screenshots of every anomaly I saw, and store them on the phone. Restoring the phone to its factory state did not help.
    After some time, I concluded there was still something wrong my IPhone, scheduled a Genius Bar appointment, and had it replaced with a brand new IPhone 3g. Having numerous screenshots of different problems minimized the explanations to a minimum.
    *IPhone 3G Model MB048LL, 2.0.1 firmware*
    I had a chance to compare the new model with the previous one I had - the build felt a bit different. The screen on this new model has a slightly better contrast, too (compared default factory settings).
    *The new model, however, has GREAT 3g reception*. Where with the previous model I had 2-3 bars of 3g, I now have 5 bars. The dbm numbers are also somewhat improved. I had a couple of small issues with apps, etc., but I figured them out - found which apps were crashing the system, and deleted them, cleaned up the old backups and the crash diagnostic crash reports from the previous model, etc. Finally all other problems I was having with the previous model are now gone, too, except the quirkiness of the GPS, but I suspect it's the new firmware, and not much I can do about it. I have yet to see a dropped call on this new model.
    However this new model identified a new problem, something that I'd suspected for some time: it appears that the problems people are having could indeed be the combination of IPhone hardware/software and AT&T network.
    I noticed the data speeds vary significantly throughout the day, even when you sit at the same desk. I noticed the speed drops significantly approximately during lunch time to ~90-300kb for download, would be ok during the day (~200-350kb for download), and would be AWESOME after 10pm - ~0.9 - 1.4Mbs.
    One can make a conclusion here that AT&T simply does not have enough network capacity to handle the peak data load, when many people connect on the network. It could be that IPhone's software does not manage very well under such conditions, but I'd would place more blame on AT&T in this case, considering how exceptionally well IPhone performs during other times.
    I'd like to point out that although both Apple and AT&T reps were genuinely trying to be helpful, I could clearly see that not one person I talked to on both sides did not have a clear solution how to resolve the problems I was having. Basically, I had to figure out what the problem could be, and use the resources available to try to solve it - be that replacing the phone, restoring from backups, monitoring the crash logs for problematic apps, etc.
    Message was edited by: rndip077
    Message was edited by: rndip077
    Message was edited by: rndip077

    I would constructively suggest that you edit your post pretty quickly if you want to avoid a highly deserved, verbal battering from every unemotional, highly rational and intelligent poster on this forum who might take offence to your demeaning attitude. I think to assume that because people who have posted on here have posted at all because they are emotional basket-cases, or in some way out of control of their emotions merely because they have aired their disappointment/disgust/anger with their sub-functioning iPhones is pretty insulting and undeserved. Whatever YOU have written here, or have experienced elsewhere, still only has the value of 1 (ONE). It is a poll of 1. It is an opinion of 1. No more valid than that, no more authority than that.

  • Problem with access another domain data

    Hi
    I want to access another domain data like XML and html page, I tried crossdomain.xml.
    but not working plz Help me if u can.

    What's the Java console say?

  • Data Roaming Problems with Lumia 610 and 710 phone...

    Data Roaming problem with Lumia Wndows 7.5 phones.  We have a Lumia 710 and also 610 phones on Virgin pay monthly sim cards.  We cannot get data raoming to work on either phone.  We have tried in a number of locations in France and Switzerland. Virgin confirm roaming and data roaming are set up on our account.  
    - I have purchased Data Passes.  
    - Settings>Mobile Network active network shows current operator
    - Data Connection is on,
    - Data roaming option shows "roam",
     - highest connection speed is 3G,
     - network selection is automatic.
     - Flight mode is off.  
     - Account settings are ok because everything works on Wifi.
     - Connection has been full bars showing 3G.  
     - I have tried hard resets of phone, manual network selection, deleted browsing history,
     - phone software reports that it is up to date,
     - I have run Network Setup which confirms phone has been updated network settings for relevant operator.
     - Telephone calls to Virgin from Switzerland could not resolve the problem.  
     - Discussions with Virgin since returning home have not been able to solve the problem.  It seems to be an issue with Lumia phones. 
    Can anyone help please? Nokia - why doesn't this work on your phones?

    I'm like what an OS this phone has. All I can say is that if you own MS stock dump it fast as the OS on this phone is so bad its not even funny.
    I think what they are trying to do here is a last ditch attempt to capture the online services market but it isn't going to work, because they have made this OS to weird.
    I'm a pretty seasoned user and I generally am able to get gadgets to work but dudes this puppy is something else. I have 14 days to exchange it so Im going to give it my best shot for another couple of days and see where it goes.
    The phone itself is pretty decent otherwise I would have returned on the 2nd day. Its pretty fast and the screen is nice and bright and if not some major concerns I wouldn't be a complaining.
    1st} There is no way to import your bookmarks into the phone without using a online service.
    2nd} I haven't been able to successfully export my old contact list from my LG P500 Android.
    The 710 seems to only use contacts that are stored on online services even though I have imported my contacts using the Contact transfer function on the phone.
    3rd)The phone won't shut off while charging even if you shut the phone down , plug it in and it turns on no matter what you do.
    The Zune software is all glitter and no meat too unfortunately.
    I really wanted an alternative and the phone is such good value and a local new Provider has a 27 $ a month unlimited everything, but luckily they have a 14 day phone exchange policy.
    I'm going to keep for a few more days and see if I can get it to work the way i want it to.
    Moderator's notes: Profanity removed, such language is not tolerated on the forums, please read the forum guidelines. 

  • Adjusting data speed

    In the help for Elements 9, it states "With some video codecs, you can specify the data speed," and I would like to know what codecs these are. At the moment I am trying to convert 1080i video to 720p, and the best I can come up with are files which look decent but have a ludicrously high data speed and are in the range of 3GB for one minute of footage.
    Does anyone know what I should be using? Thanks in advance.

    If that's the case, you should be outputting your videos using Share/Computer/MPEG using the preset for 1440x1080. This creates an HDV file at excellent editing quality -- about 12 gigs per hour of footage. (Essentially the same as DV-AVIs are for regular definition video.)
    You can then load these videos (.m2t's) into a project set up for HDV and they will work beautifully.
    Other codecs and compression sets may produce files of varying sizes, but this will create the perfect file for usage in another hi-def project. In fact, other codecs or file formats may actually give you MORE problems later if you try to use them as source footage in another project. (I explain this all in greater details in my book, if you're interested.)
    This is likewise the ideal format to output if you plan to use your video as source footage for a BluRay disc.
    This is why we always recommend starting at the end to get to the beginning. If you figure out what you ultimately want to output, it's much easier to figure out what you need to do at the beginning.
    And all of this, of course, is dependent on your choosing the best project settings for your source footage when you first start your project too.

  • Intermittent data-speed issues with iPhone 4S

    I am using an iPhone 4S (64), iOS-5.1, AT&T carrier.
    Occasionally, when using Safari, there will be no response when I try to bring up a website, even when I'm showing full bars and 4G coverage. The "whirligig" wheel just keeps on spinning and spinning until the website-load times out. This problem is intermittent, but occurs semi-regularly. There seems to be no correlation with the strength of the signal I'm receiving, or my location, and I know that I have not had my data speed "throttled" as a result of being a heavy data user. I called the Apple Helpdesk one time and received the advice that I should, when this happens, go to >Settings, >General, >Reset, >Reset Network Settings. Although this usually works, it's inconvenient, and I'm seeking a more permanent solution.

    Last month I checked the data usage on my iPhone 4S three days after the start of a new billing cycle. To my shock I discovered that I had been charged with about 193 MB of usage. That was very odd because 193 MB is well above what my total data usage is each month. Immediately contacted AT&T Customer Service--twice. Each time they could not provide an explanation as to why the data usage was charged to my phone. All they could tell me was that all of the 193 MB were charged on the very day the new billing cycle started. They did try to sell me a larger data plan.
    I thought maybe this was just an odd thing that couldn’t be explained. Kept a close eye on my data usage for the reminder of the billing cycle and didn’t have another large data charge. I still stayed well under the 300 MB plan limit even with the unexpected 193 MB of usage on day one.
    Then my wife checks her iPhone 4S data usage on day one of this month's billing cycle at about 9 AM. She finds that she has been charged with 30 MB of data usage when she hasn't even used her phone. Again, 9 AM; day one of new billing cycle; 30 MB of usage; no active applications running. How can this be? She contacted AT&T Customer Service and once again they were no help. She made two phone calls and also spoke with one CS Manager, but no one could explain why she has been charged for the 30 MB. Anyone else having this problem? Please help us resolve this if you know what to do? Extremely frustrating to be charged for data we know we are not using. Getting no help from AT&T Customer No-Service.   

  • 575 LRE and data transfer problems

    575 LRE and data transfer problems
    Hello,
    I have a connection from my provider using the Cisco 575 LRE, configured for 10 Mbit/s. I don't know the make and model of the switch but I assume it is likely a Cisco device also.
    I'm experiencing problems with the LRE connection whenever big files are being transfered simultaneously in both down- and upstream directions to/from a PC. The data transfer may slow down to a stall and all WAN connectivity may become momentarily blocked. Transfer speeds and reliability always seem good as long as big files don't get transferred in both directions at the same time.
    What could cause this problem? My service provider says that they see no problems in their end and they are unable to help me. I don't know how extensively they have looked into any possibility of problems though.
    I've tried different 100Mbit network cards, replacing ethernet and phone cabling and changing duplex settings and MTU, but nothing has completely solved the problem so far. Forcing network cards to full-duplex does prevent the worst slowdown and hanging described above, but limits upload speed to around half of the maximum available.
    Not sure if this is meaningful here, but my service provider claims they have the switch my CPE is connected to configured for full-duplex, but when I have a PC network card set to autonegotiation, it will always result in a 100baseTX half-duplex link with the 575 - this is the case where I get maximum speed in either one direction but also the mentioned problems with bi-directional transfer.
    I don't know what more I can do to the PCs here to solve this problem and I don't have access to configuring the CPE device, because I don't own the switch it is connected to. I can only think of trying to ask my ISP to read this thread if someone has a possible solution that requires actions on their behalf.
    Any help would be much appreciated.

    The problem, as you describe it, is most likely cabling ...it could be the cable between your PC(s) and the 575 (most likely), or between the 575 and the switch.
    What you are seeing are the effects of crosstalk (signal from one pair interfereing with the other pair), that's why you see it in full-duplex mode and not (so much) in half-duplex (with half-duplex, only one side talks at a time).
    The only part you would be likely be able to change would be the connections on your side of the 575 ... so, try another cable; preferably a store-bought cable and in good shape (twisted, crushed, kinked, stretched, and poorly constructed cables are a Very Bad Thing).
    LRE was designed to handle voice-grade cabling, but if you're at near the extreme length, you may see some degradation.
    Good Luck
    Scott

  • My ethernet data speed slowly slows down until it doesn't work. How do I fix this.

    So as the title says, I plug my MacPro into hard wired ethernet and slowly but surely my data speeds drop to the point that I have to unplug the ethernet and go back to using wifi. Then if I restart the computer and plug it back in it'll work fine for a little and start to do the same thing. Is there anything I can do to fix this problem.
    Thanks,
    Rick

    Please read this whole message before doing anything.
    This procedure is a diagnostic test. It won’t solve your problem. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
    The purpose of this exercise is to determine whether the problem is localized to your user account, or is system-wide. Enable guest logins and log in as Guest. For instructions, launch the System Preferences application, select “Help” from the menu bar, and enter “Set up a guest account” (without the quotes) in the search box.
    While logged in as Guest, you won’t have access to any of your personal files or settings. Any application you run will behave as if you were running it for the first time. Don’t be alarmed by this; it’s normal. If you need any passwords or other personal data in order to complete the test, memorize, print, or write them down before you begin.
    As Guest, launch the application(s) and test. Same problem(s)?
    After testing, log out of the guest account and, in your own account, disable it if you wish. Any files you created in the guest account will be deleted automatically when you log out of it.

  • Can we restrict a master data characterstic using another master data chara

    Hi All,
    Can we restrict a master data characterstic using another master data characterstic, if they were both compounded together. There are two fields viz.., A,B  in r/3 master data table in which A and B combinely serve as a key. In BW side i have created a master data object for A and compuded object B ot it. So that i am getting all the data from r/3 table. But in query designer when i am trying to restrict object A values by object B, in a structure i am not getting any data. If i do same out of structure i am getting data in report. Please help in overcoming this problem.
    Regards,
    Rajkandula

    Hi,
    Yes it should display data, but it is not displaying. If i am doing the same restriction out side of a structure i am getting data. But whilr trying to do so, i am not getting that. The reason why i am bothering about structure is 'Objext B have 10 different values and i want 10 coloumns in report in whicg Obj A must display respective data when i restrict it by B' , whicg i can do this only if i use structure else i can't restrict B that many times .
    I hope u got my problem and plz give help me in this.
    Regards,
    Rajkandula

  • Data Transfer Problem Getting Status 51

    Hi Experts,
    I have two logical systems namely cln 000 and t90clnt090 assigned to clients 000 and 800 respectively,
    and i am transferring data from 800 to 000.
    My message type is matmas and i am tranferring data using tcode bd10,but while i am transferring the data my outbound idoc shows the status of 03 in the sending system but in the receiving system i am getting a status of 51 and when i acces the application log it says something like this
    The material T-BW07-28 does not exist or is not activated
    Message no. M3305
    Diagnosis
    You wanted to display or process data on the material T-BW07-28. However, the material does not yet exist; that is, it has not yet been created, or its creation has been scheduled, but the material has not yet been activated.
    Procedure
    Check and correct your entry.
    Now what can i do to solve this problem.
    Regards
    Abhinab.

    Hi Abhinab,
    Please be informed that we cannot create materials through idocs.  See you are able to transfer data through ALE from one system to another, even though that material is not present in receiving system, only thing is that data cannot be processed successfully,there are some conditions which are required to be met for the data to be processed successfully.
    Like in your case when you are trying to send data for a material which is only present in sending system, still idoc is generated, it contains data and you can see that data in receiving system in we02 through inbound idoc, but in inbound system the idoc which carries data cannot be processed sucessfully due to inconsistencies in data.
    It is not only material number that you are trying to send when you send data by using message type MATMAS, but it also carries other properties of material like material type, material group etc depending on which basic type you are using (for eg. MATMAS05). You can see the documentation for basic type through transaction WE60. So if you want the data related to that material number to be processed successfully, at least that material should be present in inbound system and material should be active.
    For the other error which you are getting while creating material directly through MM01
    The field MARA-RMATP is not ready for input and was therefore not initialized.
    The field MARA-BMATN is not ready for input and was therefore not initialized
    I dont have much idea about this but as far as i think you should try using BDC or using BAPI (BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA).
    Again for the data to be processed successfully , you should fix all data related problems then try transferring data from one system to another.
    Hope i am able to clear to some extent.
    Regards
    Vinod

  • K9N2 Sli Platinum + SSD OCZ Vertex 3 = Slow Speed Problem [PARTIALLY SOLVED]

    Hey folks,
    I have a problem with my new SSD. I only get sequential reads of 140MB/s and writes of 114MB/s.
    I think it is a driver related issue. I once got faster SATA2-like speeds but cannot reproduce the system settings again... Everything back to SATA1-like speeds after reboot.
    First my pc specs:
    MSI K9N2 Sli Platinum, BIOS v3.9
    - 6 SATAII ports by nForce 750a SLI
    - 2 ESATA (External-SATA) ports (back panel) by JMB363
    - Supports storage and data transfers at up to 3 Gb/s
    AMD Phenom II 965 Black
    Patriot PV224G8500ELKB Viper II Series DDR2 4GB (2 x 2GB, CL5 PC-8500/1066MHz)
    SSD SATAIII OCZ Vertex 3, 120GB, FW v2.11
    LG Internal BlueRay BH10LS30
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
    I only get very slow speeds with the SSD. I tried so many things that I am getting very frustrated now, I am even thinking about getting a new board and ram just to get the SSD up to speed...  
    1)
    I installed Win7 first with all the default settings in Windows Setup from DVD. Default "IDE ATA/ATAPI controllers" driver was "Standard AHCI1.0 Serial ATA Controller".
    SSD was connected to SATA1-port,  On-Chip Sata Controller AHCI enabled in BIOS,  Extra RAID/IDE Controller disabled.
    All fine, but whichever benchmark I used (AS SSD, HD Tune Pro, Atto Disk Benchmark, CrystalDiskMark; other tools used: DriveControllerInfo, AIDA64/Everest, CrystalDiskInfo ) I got e.g. 140MB/s Read and 114MB/s Write sequentially (CrystalDiskmark, similar with random data AND only zeros ).
    Trim working (it seems) with AHCI driver. I also changed to nvstor64 driver (nforce driver setup 15.56), with is marginally faster but not what you would expect from a SATAIII drive on SATAII controller.
    2)
    I installed Win7 using "diskpart" (Shift-F10) during disk setup, setting a cluster size of 64k instead of default. No real change.
    3)
    After reinstall of Win7 x64 (again...), I changed from SATA1 port to SATA6 port, also enabled Extra Raid/IDE controller set to AHCI as well.
    Nothing changed. With all settings to default in Windows (ahci default driver), I then manually updated the ahci to nvstore64 driver in Device Management, rebooted.
    Then a minute later after reboot I got the following Sequential speeds with CrystalDiskMark:
    273MB/s read and 137MB/s write (random data)  +  274MB/s read and 220MB/s write (with zeros) !!!
    While I ran this benchmark Windows came up with a message: "You must restart your computer to apply these changes - Restart Now/Restart Later".
    After the previos reboot, when I changed manually from AHCI to NVSTORE, I had changed nothing in the current session, apart from running CrystalDiskMark.
    I did reboot and I was back to the slow SSD speeds again = 140/114 MB/s...
    4)
    I have tried every possible combination of mainboard SATA ports, drivers changing with nvidia setup/manually, deleting and disabling controllers (incl BSOD and startup repair :D ), chaning bios settings around, but I just cannot get back the faster speeds  
    There is never any change in speed, whether I use ahci or nvstore64, whichever benchmark I use, whether random or zeros...
    5)
    Could the SSD be broken, something internally preventing it from faster speeds (with this one random exception)?
    Could it be that my K9N2 SataPorts only allows for / reduced to SATA1 speeds?
    Am I missing something with the driver setup?
    Do I need additional drivers for the extra JMicron Controller when using SataPorts 5/6 ?
    I have no other mainboard to test this with...
    Please guys, I am going to jump out of the window if I can't fix it... :(
    Thanks, Mike

    Hey guys - problem 'solved':  
    I tested the OCZ SSD Vertex 3 120GB with following sata3 controller card http://www.lycom.com.tw/PE-115H.htm.
    The card itself works immediately (needs at least PCIe x4 slot, will work slower otherwise but still faster than the OCZ SSD @sata1 with nvidia chipset).
    There is some raid setup, doesn't apply to me, the boot even with the card is really only a few seconds longer and not annoying at all. Windows (7 x64) needed a driver, supplied on CD (which is cheap and making noise like h**l). The card works w/o the driver but doesn't harm to install it...
    Also, just to clarify, this sata controller card did not need any specific setup at all. Just put it in, plug in sata cable (I use akasa sata3-rated), maybe change boot device in BIOS (I didn't even have to), done - booting Windows as usual.
    Benchmark CDM with sata controller card Lycom PE-115H:
    http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/3845/cdmpe115hahci0x00.png
    http://img850.imageshack.us/img850/7549/cdmpe115hahcirand.png
    Speed is much better than before with nvidia chipset 750a SLI controller: sata1 (sata2 whenever it randomly worked):
    http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/505/cdmahci0x0.png
    http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/6258/cdmahci0x0sata6contnv64.png
    Final thoughts:
    Well, I am happy with the SSD speed now (PCIe limited to 5Gbps). However, I had to spent quite some time to get it working on my sata2-cabable mainboard. Finally, I had to buy a extra controller card to get it working reliably at speeds faster than sata1. There is hardly any useful information on why this problem occurs with (older) nvidia chipsets and OCZ (sata3) SSDs. I still think that OCZ must know about this problem, but regards this issue as low priority, while at the same time not planning on giving up on sales to people with nvidia chipsets. Maybe OCZ should just make a big sticker on the box the drives come in with something like "Does/Might not work with nvidia chipsets, please use third-party sata controller card or different SSD manufacturer".   But then none of these potential customers would buy OCZ SSDs...  
    I will keep the sata3 controller, anyway handy to have, but return the OCZ Vertex 3 120GB and replace it with a SSD from a different manufacturer (Corsair Force GT, Patriot and OWC are not that great to get around here). The benchmarks for most people will not achieve the maximum advertised OCZ speeds anyway, so why not go with a brand that allows for some plug'n'play with some customer support.
    Hope this post helps others like me with their nvidia chipset  + sata1 speed problem
    Cheers, Mike

  • Java Audio Metronome | Timing and Speed Problems

    Hi all,
    I’m starting to work on a music/metronome application in Java and I’m running into some problems with the timing and speed.
    For testing purposes I’m trying to play two sine wave tones at the same time at regular intervals, but instead they play in sync for a few beats and then slightly out of sync for a few beats and then back in sync again for a few beats.
    From researching good metronome programming, I found that Thread.sleep() is horrible for timing, so I completely avoided that and went with checking System.nanoTime() to determine when the sounds should play.
    I’m using AudioSystem’s SourceDataLine for my audio player and I’m using a thread for each tone that constantly polls System.nanoTime() in order to determine when the sound should play. I create a new SourceDataLine and delete the previous one each time a sound plays, because the volume fluctuates if I leave the line open and keep playing sounds on the same line. I create the player before polling nanoTime() so that the player is already created and all it has to do is play the sound when it is time.
    In theory this seemed like a good method for getting each sound to play on time, but it’s not working correctly.
    At the moment this is just a simple test in Java, but my goal is to create my app on mobile devices (Android, iOS, Windows Phone, etc)...however my current method isn’t even keeping perfect time on a PC, so I’m worried that certain mobile devices with limited resources will have even more timing problems. I will also be adding more sounds to it to create more complex rhythms, so it needs to be able to handle multiple sounds going simultaneously without sounds lagging.
    Another problem I’m having is that the max tempo is controlled by the length of the tone since the tones don’t overlap each other. I tried adding additional threads so that every tone that played would get its own thread...but that really screwed up the timing, so I took it out. I would like to have a way to overlap the previous sound to allow for much higher tempos.
    I posted this question on StackOverflow where I got one reply and my response back explains why I went this direction instead of preloading a larger buffer (which is what they recommended). In short, I did try the buffer method first, but I want to also update a “beat counter” visual display and there was no way to know when the hardware was actually playing the sounds from the buffer. I mentioned that on StackOverflow and I also asked a couple more questions regarding the buffer method, but I haven’t received any more responses.
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24110247/java-audio-metronome-timing-and-speed-problems
    Any help getting these timing and speed issues straightened out would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.
    Here is my code...
    SoundTest.java
    import java.awt.*; 
    import java.awt.event.*; 
    import javax.swing.*; 
    import javax.swing.event.*; 
    import java.io.*; 
    import javax.sound.sampled.*; 
    public class SoundTest implements ActionListener { 
        static SoundTest soundTest; 
        // ENABLE/DISABLE SOUNDS 
        boolean playSound1  = true; 
        boolean playSound2  = true; 
        JFrame mainFrame; 
        JPanel mainContent; 
        JPanel center; 
        JButton buttonPlay; 
        int sampleRate = 44100; 
        long startTime;  
        SourceDataLine line = null;  
        int tickLength; 
        boolean playing = false; 
        SoundElement sound01; 
        SoundElement sound02; 
        public static void main (String[] args) {        
            soundTest = new SoundTest(); 
            SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() { public void run() { 
                soundTest.gui_CreateAndShow(); 
        public void gui_CreateAndShow() { 
            gui_FrameAndContentPanel(); 
            gui_AddContent(); 
        public void gui_FrameAndContentPanel() { 
            mainContent = new JPanel(); 
            mainContent.setLayout(new BorderLayout()); 
            mainContent.setPreferredSize(new Dimension(500,500)); 
            mainContent.setOpaque(true); 
            mainFrame = new JFrame("Sound Test");                
            mainFrame.setContentPane(mainContent);               
            mainFrame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE); 
            mainFrame.pack(); 
            mainFrame.setVisible(true); 
        public void gui_AddContent() { 
            JPanel center = new JPanel(); 
            center.setOpaque(true); 
            buttonPlay = new JButton("PLAY / STOP"); 
            buttonPlay.setActionCommand("play"); 
            buttonPlay.addActionListener(this); 
            buttonPlay.setPreferredSize(new Dimension(200, 50)); 
            center.add(buttonPlay); 
            mainContent.add(center, BorderLayout.CENTER); 
        public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) { 
            if (!playing) { 
                playing = true; 
                if (playSound1) 
                    sound01 = new SoundElement(this, "Sound1", 800, 1); 
                if (playSound2) 
                    sound02 = new SoundElement(this, "Sound2", 1200, 1); 
                startTime = System.nanoTime(); 
                if (playSound1) 
                    new Thread(sound01).start(); 
                if (playSound2) 
                    new Thread(sound02).start(); 
            else { 
                playing = false; 
    SoundElement.java
    import java.io.*; 
    import javax.sound.sampled.*; 
    public class SoundElement implements Runnable { 
        SoundTest soundTest; 
        // TEMPO CHANGE 
        // 750000000=80bpm | 300000000=200bpm | 200000000=300bpm 
        long nsDelay = 750000000; 
        long before; 
        long after; 
        long diff; 
        String name=""; 
        int clickLength = 4100;  
        byte[] audioFile; 
        double clickFrequency; 
        double subdivision; 
        SourceDataLine line = null; 
        long audioFilePlay; 
        public SoundElement(SoundTest soundTestIn, String nameIn, double clickFrequencyIn, double subdivisionIn){ 
            soundTest = soundTestIn; 
            name = nameIn; 
            clickFrequency = clickFrequencyIn; 
            subdivision = subdivisionIn; 
            generateAudioFile(); 
        public void generateAudioFile(){ 
            audioFile = new byte[clickLength * 2]; 
            double temp; 
            short maxSample; 
            int p=0; 
            for (int i = 0; i < audioFile.length;){ 
                temp = Math.sin(2 * Math.PI * p++ / (soundTest.sampleRate/clickFrequency)); 
                maxSample = (short) (temp * Short.MAX_VALUE); 
                audioFile[i++] = (byte) (maxSample & 0x00ff);            
                audioFile[i++] = (byte) ((maxSample & 0xff00) >>> 8); 
        public void run() { 
            createPlayer(); 
            audioFilePlay = soundTest.startTime + nsDelay; 
            while (soundTest.playing){ 
                if (System.nanoTime() >= audioFilePlay){ 
                    play(); 
                    destroyPlayer(); 
                    createPlayer();              
                    audioFilePlay += nsDelay; 
            try { destroyPlayer(); } catch (Exception e) { } 
        public void createPlayer(){ 
            AudioFormat af = new AudioFormat(soundTest.sampleRate, 16, 1, true, false); 
            try { 
                line = AudioSystem.getSourceDataLine(af); 
                line.open(af); 
                line.start(); 
            catch (Exception ex) { ex.printStackTrace(); } 
        public void play(){ 
            line.write(audioFile, 0, audioFile.length); 
        public void destroyPlayer(){ 
            line.drain(); 
            line.close(); 

    Thanks but you have never posted reply s0lutions before ?? And F 4 is definitely not 10 times faster as stated before I upgraded !!

  • DATE FIELD PROBLEMS - URGENT

    I´m having trouble with FormsCentral.
    My form is running about 8 months with no problems.
    Yesterday people started to complain that the system doesn´t accept any date.
    That means the date field restricts date entries, from date dd/mm/aaaa (brazilian format) to another dd/mm/aaaa, but every date that users input in, is considered by the system as invalid, even it´s a correct and valid date right between the interval specified!
    I need Help Urgent!!!
    I depend on these forms to finish the payrol service from here.
    Thanks
    I´ll be waiting.
    Maurício Galletti
    Message was edited by: SNOWMAUSS
    It look like the system accepts just dates starting from the date of today.
    I´m testing.
    Please help.
    Thanks
    Message was edited by: SNOWMAUSS
    It looks like the system have some problem just with the date 20/10/2013?!
    I´ve fixed the problem change the interval from 20/10/2013 to another date  and used  21/10/2013 to another date and it works!
    But I think something is wrong with the 20/10/2013 date?!
    To reproduce the erros just create a new form with date feature with this exaclty configurations and the bug appears:
    I´ll keep waiting
    Message was edited by: SNOWMAUSS

    Hi
    I´ve concluded that the problem persist if the date interval starts at the
    specific date "20/10/2013". Don´t know why?!
    Look at the screen capture above, you aks for
    Thanks a lot
    image: Imagem inline 1
    Maurício P. Galletti
    Contador
    [email protected]
    ( 55 11 3331-5567
    www.cadt.com.br
    2013/10/29 Genevieve Laroche <[email protected]>
       Re: DATE FIELD PROBLEMS - URGENT  created by Genevieve Laroche<http://forums.adobe.com/people/Genevieve+Laroche>in
    FormsCentral - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/5797083#5797083

  • Are there known data usage problems with iPhone 4S?

    I just got my first iPhone. I barely know how to use the thing and pretty much only use it for checking my work email. I blew through 7 GB of data in 20 days. From everyone I've talked to there is no way I have done this based on my limited usage. So something is running in the background that I can't control. I've turned off the cellular setting and told it to only use wifi, and when I'm at home it appears to be using my wifi. I read some other comments here saying it could be a problem with the iOS, but it didn't seem like a definite answer. Any other ideas?

    Last month I checked the data usage on my iPhone 4S three days after the start of a new billing cycle. To my shock I discovered that I had been charged with about 193 MB of usage. That was very odd because 193 MB is well above what my total data usage is each month. Immediately contacted AT&amp;T Customer Service--twice. Each time they could not provide an explanation as to why the data usage was charged to my phone. All they could tell me was that all of the 193 MB were charged on the very day the new billing cycle started. They did try to sell me a larger data plan.
    I thought maybe this was just an odd thing that couldn’t be explained. Kept a close eye on my data usage for the reminder of the billing cycle and didn’t have another large data charge. I still stayed well under the 300 MB plan limit even with the unexpected 193 MB of usage on day one.
    Then my wife checks her iPhone 4S data usage on day one of this month's billing cycle at about 9 AM. She finds that she has been charged with 30 MB of data usage when she hasn't even used her phone. Again, 9 AM; day one of new billing cycle; 30 MB of usage; no active applications running. How can this be? She contacted AT&amp;T Customer Service and once again they were no help. She made two phone calls and also spoke with one CS Manager, but no one could explain why she has been charged for the 30 MB. Anyone else having this problem? Please help us resolve this if you know what to do? Extremely frustrating to be charged for data we know we are not using. Getting no help from AT&amp;T Customer No-Service.   

  • Broadband Usage and speed problems.

    Hi.
    I have question about broadband usage.
    Its 11 days and bt website says I used more then 20GB!
    Its nearly 1.8 GB per day! I used Internet for browsing website and receive one email pre day, I download twice large amount (about 1-1,5GB) and nothing more!
    I just wonder what going on? I try monitor my usage day by day from 5 days ago and its worst and worst!!!
    I nothing download but my usage going very fast.
    Its looks like I will be download about 3 movies per day that means I will have now more then 30 movies! Its must be something wrong!
    I used before VM and my average Internet usage was about 15-20GB per Month with solid 10MB speed.
    Now my speed is **bleep** from 8mb to 1mb and sometimes less then 512kb!!! And usage is higher !!!
    How can I see details about my usage?
    And q2
    About speed - in my area BT Infinity will be available from 31.12.2010
    Its mean still BT have same works, it might be cause my slow broadband?
    And from 25.11 till now is same problem with broadband, in three days I must reset BT Hub because there is no Internet. On BT Hub anything looks fine, Is IP address etc... But is no Internet telephone and no Internet as well.
    I check by used ping bbc.co.uk

    Andy_N wrote:
    Hi.
    I hope you don't mind me asking a few questions, this may help to determine why your usage is as high as you're seeing.
    Do you have more than one computer connected ? Do you use iPlayer, or watch lots of youtube stuff ? Do you have any games machines such as XBox connected to the Internet ?
    Are you uploading lots of things ? uploads count as well as downloads.
    Are you up to date with all security and anti-virus packages, and have you run any scans recently ? (sometimes viruses and trojans can cause a usage problem).
    Your inherent speed problem could be due to various reasons, for example worsening line conditions due to weather and general wear and tear. Strangely viruses can cause a noticeable slow down, but mainly due to the computer being infected rather than the line being slow.
    Can you posssibly post the hub stats ?
    If you're using a PC, download something like Networx usage monitor and see if that can help. Of course it needs to be on each PC, but can't see the usage of games machines or Internet TV (or iPhone use etc).
    I used only 2 machines. Desktop PC and laptop. Laptop very light, just 1-2 hours per day only websurfing (3-5 websites with no movie or high quality images, 90% is just plain text)
    I not download lots of stuff, Like I just say, in VM my average monthly usage was 15-20 GB and I download few movie and lots of music.
    In December I just download one movie other traffic is just webserfing email.
    Youtube - yes I watch, but its not new staff for me, like just say my usage is not deferent then was in VM!
    Now usage monitor on BT web site say I used more then 20GB! in 11 days!!! if one movie will be 0.7GB its means I download about 30 movies!
    Its massive! I never download 30 movies in 2-3 months )
    This start about 5 days ago, when my strip goes to orange. My average Internet usage is 1.8GB !!! Even I for 2 days used Internet very little.
    I nothing upload.
    It is not possible, to anny worm or viruses used so big bandusuage if any software used Internet connection in background (like systems) its just kilobits not gigabits!
    If I will be use very hardly Internet I will be no rise alarm. But I now what I used. I have Internet for more then 7 years and now how far I go.
    And now is very strange - I less used inherent I have more GB used!
    In my calculation if my average usage per day will be 1.8GB I will used 55GB!!! I never used more 20 - max 30GB! It must be something wrong on BT site.
    I get BT Broadband option 2 be cause, I now I used about 15-20GB per months and BT Broadband option 1 is not for me, but 20GB in 11 days!
    We not talk abut 100MB! or 500MB per day we talk about nearly 2GB per day! Its massive!
    Is any chance to get detail Internet usage?
    Q2
    I loose Internet connection 3 times per week, so I need push reset button on hub.
    I left once Hub with no reset but in 5 hours it will still no Internet.
    Its looking very strange, because anything looks OK except I loos Internet phone (no blue telephone light)
    In hub stats is IP, is Downstream etc... but when I ping bbc.co.uk it say: host unavailable or similar.
    After reset working well. My be my Hub is faulty?
    Many Thanks for reply!
    Hub Stats
    Line state
    Connected
    Connection time
    1 day, 3:31:03
    Downstream
    10,124 Kbps
    Upstream
    1,022 Kbps
    ADSL settings
    VPI/VCI
    0/38
    Type
    PPPoA
    Modulation
    ITU-T G.992.5
    Latency type
    Interleaved
    Noise margin (Down/Up)
    8.8 dB / 4.9 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up)
    31.0 dB / 15.5 dB
    Output power (Down/Up)
    20.9 dBm / 12.4 dBm
    Loss of Framing (Local)
    0
    Loss of Signal (Local)
    0
    Loss of Power (Local)
    0
    FEC Errors (Down/Up)
    139453 / 426
    CRC Errors (Down/Up)
    24 / 2147480000
    HEC Errors (Down/Up)
    nil / 61462
    Error Seconds (Local)
    16

Maybe you are looking for

  • Is anyone having trouble using parenthesis to show negative numbers in excel after upgrading to Yosemite?

    Since upgrading to Yosemite, I can no longer reflect negative numbers with parenthesis using excel.  All of my existing spreadsheets also no longer show parenthesis, creating formatting problems.  Is anyone else experiencing this and is there a solut

  • How do i change the default Page Setup settings?

    I have a recurring "bug" - whenever i open a PDF - and usually when i create new files (in any program), the default setting is to have it print horizontally at 65%. to be more concise, if i open a blank document in "Text Edit" as an example and go t

  • Itunes 11.has deleted all playlists -help??

    Hi iTunes has deleted all of my playlists! the music is all still there, just no playlists. can I get them back?

  • Using owa_util.showpage

    Hi, I just learning how the package owa_util works in my db 10g and I don't Know why the code that I describe below give me a few errors: CREATE TABLE feds_data ( tid       NUMBER(9), serial_no VARCHAR2(30), mfg_abbr  VARCHAR2(8), type_code VARCHAR2(

  • Great iPhone 3G Experience - Andrew at Pacific Place in Seattle

    I know that Apple and AT&T have been taking a lot of hits about the 3G launch, but we went through it today and I gotta say - it was flawless. My husband and I arrived at Pacific Place at 5:45 this morning. We were about sixth in line when we got the