Apply QOS to vrf traffic?(Ethernet SubInts)
Hi,
I'm trying to apply "GOLD" QOS to vrf traffic that is terminated on eth subints, but class-map is not allowing me to match on subinterfaces:
class-map match-any GOLD
match mpls experimental topmost 5
match ip precedence 5
match input-interface fastEthernet 0/0 (Subints not allowed)
I also cannot match on access-group, as the traffic is within a vrf.
Should I be creating a seperate policy-map marking the traffic as GOLD, and then apply this as a "service-policy input" to each eth subint the vrf is associated with?
Hi,
when you apply the service-policy to an interface you do NOT need to specify the interface in the class-map! Example:
class-map match-any VoIP
match ip precedence 5
match ip dscp ef
policy-map Marking
class VoIP
set mpls experimental imposition 5
interface FastEthernet0/0.100
ip address ...
encapsulation dot1q 100
service-policy input Marking
This will set MPLS exp bits on all traffic coming into F0/0.100 and being marked with either Prec 5 or DSCP EF.
Sidenote: using an ACL in class VoIP will also only match traffic on the interface, where the policy is applied. So overlapping customer addresses are not an issue.
Hope this helps! Please rate all posts.
Regards, Martin
Similar Messages
-
Qos- I want to apply limit on FTP traffic
I want to apply Qos on ftp traffic on cisco 6500. Ftp traffic should use only 512 kbps bandwidth. Please any one suggest how should i establish this and any study document will be welcome.
Thanks in advanceDisclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
How would depend very much on the QoS features of the device. Even 6500 QoS features depend on line cards.
Most, but not all, Cisco switches support 4 egress queue which you can provide different bandwidth allocations. Such allocations usually provide a minimum, but more bandwidth might be used if its otherwise not being used.
For example, you might define four queues that one is a priority queue for real-time traffic; one is a foreground queue with a large bandwidth allocation (not that such traffic should be bandwidth intensive, but to insure high priority for dequeuing; one is a background queue with minimum bandwidth allocation (often where you might want to direct FTP); and the last is a middle allocation for everything else, i.e. your default.
Also on switches, traffic is often placed into a particular egress queue based on L2 CoS or L3 ToS. So, what this means, you'll want to mark your FTP traffic differently than your other traffic, perhaps with CoS 1 or DSCP CS1 or AF1x.
Cisco has some great guides on how to configure QoS for their different platforms although their 11 class model is often overly complex. -
Hi guys,
we are creating a new MPLS cloud with the following VRFs: VRF- Voice, VRF- Data and VRF - Citrix.
My question is: is VRF traffic indepedent from other VRFs (talking about QoS) or I have to request to my MPLS provider to apply QoS?
I would like to have 3 Levels of QoS: Voice, Citrix and Data (that matches with the VRFs).
So it is QoS needed on the MPLS Provider side to increase my traffic performance for voice and Citrix?
Thank you very much for your help.
JordiHi Jordi
You will need to have QOS configured for all the VRFs separately because of two main reasons:
1. Creating a VRF doesn't guarantee that you will get priority.
2. After the traffic enters the Service Provider backbone its all MPLS traffic and many customers share the same backbone, so to have an effective treatment of your traffic you will need to define proper QOS.
Regads
Vivek -
How to apply Qos in the precedence of cache server
m in an isp and iwant to apply the QOS to enhance my network internet performance
actually i have two requests , i will start with showing brief topology about my network and start asking the questions .
here is the topology below :
from the topology above , my access is only on R1 which is BGP internet gateway router and R2 is my ISP router.
1- i want to apply Qos on R1 so that a subnet of 32 ips to have gurantee bandwidth of 30M .
assume the subnet is 10.20.30.0/27 that need to be bw gurantee .
2- i want the download traffic by idman or ftp on my Router R1 dont exceed 50 % of my total bw .
i mean that i have 450M bandwith from my isp , & sometimes we have a slow in browsing , so i want to enhance the browsing quality because its more important that downloading files from internet.
here is my two requests above , i dont know how it will work with the precedence of the cache server .
anyway , i will paste my config of router and i will replace my puplic ips with xxx for privacy .
7200Gateway#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 10149 bytes
upgrade fpd auto
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
service password-encryption
hostname 7200Gateway
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
logging message-counter syslog
logging buffered 50000
enable secret xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
no aaa new-model
ip source-route
ip wccp 80 redirect-list CACHE80
ip wccp 90 redirect-list CACHE90
ip cef
no ip domain lookup
ip accounting-threshold 4294967295
login block-for 180 attempts 3 within 60
login quiet-mode access-class telnet
login on-failure log
login on-success log
no ipv6 cef
multilink bundle-name authenticated
username xxxxxx password xxxxx
archive
log config
hidekeys
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description LAN
bandwidth 230000
ip address 10.160.150.2 255.255.255.0
ip wccp 80 redirect in
ip policy route-map CACHE-REDIRECT
load-interval 30
duplex auto
speed auto
media-type rj45
negotiation auto
interface FastEthernet0/2
no ip address
shutdown
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
description Cache
bandwidth 150000
ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.248
ip wccp redirect exclude in
load-interval 30
duplex auto
speed 1000
media-type rj45
negotiation auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/3
description Internet
bandwidth 230000
ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252
ip wccp 90 redirect in
load-interval 30
duplex full
speed 1000
media-type sfp
negotiation auto
router bgp zzzzzzz
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
network xxxx mask xxxxx
network xxxx mask xxxx
network xxxx mask xxxxx
network xxxx mask xxxx
network xxxx mask xxxxx
network xxxx mask xxxx
redistribute connected
redistribute static
neighbor zzzzzzzz remote-as zzzzzzz
neighbor zzzzzzz password zzzzzzz
neighbor zzzzzz route-map Pipo out
no auto-summary
ip forward-protocol nd
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xxxxxxxxxxx
ip route xxxxxxxx 255.255.0.0 xxxxxxxxxx
ip route xxxxxxxx 255.255.0.0 xxxxxxxxxx
ip route xxxxxxxx 255.255.0.0 xxxxxxxxxx
ip route xxxxxxxx 255.255.0.0 xxxxxxxxxx
ip route xxxxxxxx 255.255.0.0 xxxxxxxxxx
ip route xxxxxxxx 255.255.0.0 xxxxxxxxxx
ip route xxxxxxxx 255.255.0.0 xxxxxxxxxx
no ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip flow-top-talkers
top 200
sort-by bytes
cache-timeout 5000
ip access-list extended bb
permit ip xxxx.xxxx.xx.0 0.0.1.255 any
ip access-list extended CACHE80
permit tcp xxxxxxx any eq www
ip access-list extended CACHE90
permit tcp any xxxxx.0 0.0.0.255
ip access-list extended pipo
permit ip xxxxx xxxxxxx any
permit ip xxxxx xxxxxxx any
ip access-list extended private
permit tcp 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 any eq www
permit ip 10.20.30.0 0.0.0.255 any
ip access-list extended telnet
permit ip xxxxxx xxxxxxx.255.255 any log
permit ip xxxx xxxxx 0.0.0.255 any log
ip prefix-list bb seq 5 permit xxxxx
ip prefix-list bbseq 10 permit xxxxxx
logging history size 500
no cdp run
route-map pipo permit 10
match ip address prefix-list pipo1
route-map pipo permit 20
match ip address prefix-list newsubnet
set metric 500
set origin incomplete
set as-path prepend xxxxxxxxx
route-map permit 10
match ip address prefix-list bibo
route-map CACHE-REDIRECT permit 10
match ip address private
set ip next-hop 1vvvvvv
route-map CACHE-REDIRECT permit 20
match ip address bibo e1
set ip next-hop vvvvvv
route-map CACHE-REDIRECT permit 30
match ip address pipo
set ip next-hop vvvvvvvvvv
route-map CACHE-REDIRECT permit 100
snmp-server community xxxxxx RO
control-plane
dial-peer cor custom
line con 0
password xxxxxxxx
logging synchronous
login
stopbits 1
line aux 0
stopbits 1
line vty 0 4
exec-timeout 60 0
password xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
logging synchronous
login local
endHi Vinay,
Please check the program. I have used the replace statement but it is not working.
IF NOT v_sap_bom_rec IS INITIAL.
Spliting the records at '~' delimiter
SPLIT v_sap_bom_rec AT c_del INTO wa_bom_file-model_name
wa_bom_file-product_code
wa_bom_file-description
wa_bom_file-product_type
wa_bom_file-mfg_part_num
wa_bom_file-mfg_part_desc.
REPLACE cl_abap_char_utilities=>horizontal_tab IN wa_bom_file-mfg_part_desc WITH space .
wa_bom_file-status = c_status.
APPEND wa_bom_file TO i_bom_file.
But it is not working.
Please help me..
Thanks
Neelima -
Apply QoS profile using RADIUS attributes
Hi all,
Anyone delved into the use of RADIUS attributes to apply QoS values (DSCP/802.1p) to wireless users via a WLC?
With the emergence of ISE and the concept of a shared SSID for several user types I may want to apply QoS profiles by user rather than SSID.
Do you need to apply the maximum value to the SSID for the attribute-derived value to work?
Can non-WMM client traffic be marked using this approach?
Plenty to think about here...
Any discussion welcome!
Cheers
RobYo can apply QoS RADIUS override.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6307/products_tech_note09186a0080870334.shtml
Yes it would be best to apply the wlan max qos value to the level that you intend to use with the radius override. for example if you want to apply platinum qos for voice clients on the ssid, i would map the wlan to platinum qos.
i am not sure on the next question. I think u can assign a DSCP/802.1p to a non WMM clients but I dont think the non wmm clients will benefit from it as they will not tag their traffic and hence the AP and subsequently the wired network will treat it as best effort (untagged).
Thanks, -
QOS for inbound traffic on 3560
Just to clarify what I'm asking.... I would like to make the congestion happen on our end and not on the ISP's equipment that I have no control over traffic shaping etc... I can't limit the bandwidth on the aggregate port that the metro e connects to (3750) because it would limit it for all locations and not just one. I think my only option is to limit the bandwidth on the switch at the location in question but I guess it would have to be on the ingress side, but then will it still drop packets according to dscp priority during congestion?
I have a little problem I hope you guys can help me with. We have a location that has a metro e hand off from our ISP. The same metro e also serves other locations and the aggregate point is at our main office which goes to a Cisco 3750 stack. The location in question has a single Cisco 3560 switch. We need to apply QOS for both inbound and outbound traffic to this location. I can tag the traffic to and from there but how do I make it so that the 3560 (or 3750) gets saturated and not the ISP connection for incoming traffic (so we decide what packets get dropped)? srr-queue bandwidth limit can't be used on the metro e port on the 3750 because this would limit all locations and not just the one.Should I put another small switch and put it in from of the 3560? This way I could use srr-queue and apply QOS to the egress queue.I hope this...
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community -
We have this:
src/dst---ORtr1---100Mbps---SPRtr---512kbps---Ortr2---T1---Ortr2---src/dst
Where should we apply qos? We don't have access to SPRtr(service provider) and here is sample config on our router 1 (Ortr1):
interface FastEthernet0/0
service-policy output OUR-POLICY
Class-map voice-signaling
match access-group 102
class-map voice-traffic
match access-group 101
policy-map OUR-POLICY
class voice-traffic
priority 64
class voice-signaling
bandwidth 16
class class-default
fair-queue
access-list 101 permit udp any any range 16384 32767
access-list 102 permit tcp any eq 1720 any
access-list 102 permit tcp any any eq 1720Hi,
Qos should be applied to ORtr1 FE, ORtr2 512k, ORtr3 (?) T1.
On ORtr2 and ORtr3 - connected through T1 - you can use f.e. your posted policy.
The tricky one is ORtr1 and your policy will not work. The underlying reason is: you are configuring queueing and it will only be involved IF the physical interface is overloaded. This means that there should be more than 100 Mbps traffic before your config is involved. Obviously the problem occurs already if there is more than 512k.
The solution to the problem is called "nested policy". It would look like this taking your initial policy:
interface FastEthernet0/0
service-policy output Shape512k
Class-map voice-signaling
match access-group 102
class-map voice-traffic
match access-group 101
policy-map OUR-POLICY
class voice-traffic
priority 64
class voice-signaling
bandwidth 16
class class-default
fair-queue
policy-map Shape512k
class class-default
shape 500
service-policy output OUR-POLICY
access-list 101 permit udp any any range 16384 32767
access-list 102 permit tcp any eq 1720 any
access-list 102 permit tcp any any eq 1720
The policy Shape512k will only allow 500 kbps to pass through the F0/0 interface. Once this SHAPER is overloaded you apply the policy OUR-POLICY to prioritize voip.
The idea is never overload your SPRtr interface. Thus you should not shape to 512k exactly to account for OSI layer2 overhead.
Hope this helps! Please rate all posts.
Regards, Martin -
What is the best way to apply QoS to CAD
The CAD agent that are working remotely are seeing performance issues. Hence, would it really be better to apply QOS to the CAD workers for better performance or would it just be better to give the remote workers a VMachine and have all the CAD application run locally?
Enterprise
all the teleworkers have business class cable connection with a Cisco 800 router. I know big companies are seeing the same issue latancy that is probably caused by convergence time) maybe from a WAN hiccup. in reference to the VMare -Citrix, was just idea to throw out as a better solution for a more stable enviornment, but the service control messages maybe see a lag over the WAN ...its trading one evil for another...I know CIsco mobile workers are using the CVO solution...(similar to our setup)...thoughts? -
Applying QoS to a port channel
Hi,
I've just applied QoS across our network and everything works fine with one exception. We have a 6509 with PFC running Version NmpSW: 6.1(2). The blade in question is a WS-X6348-RJ-45. Two ports on this blade are running as a port channel and a simple acl has been assigned to the individual ports to trust CoS values, see config below.
set qos acl ip trustcos trust-cos ip any any
set port qos 6/11-12 vlan-based
set qos acl map trustcos 6/48
set port channel 6/48 mode on
For some reason the DSCP values are being stripped from packets and left with a dscp/cos value of 0.
My question is Do I need to apply this acl to the port channel group? If I do, how do I do this. I've seen options for placing port channels into an admin group but I haven't done this yet and can't see any commands that would then allow me to apply an acl to such an admin group.
Any suggestions would be appriciated.
regardsYou can implememnt VACLs as described below
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080160a7e.html#wp1054941 -
Router Dead , when i applied QOS on virtual-temp interface for vpn !!
hi all ,
i have a simple brief topology below :
PSTN======(R1-7206)>F1=======F2>(R2-7604 catalyst)>>>F1=========Internet
i have two router
R2========>MLS 7604
R1======>cisco 7204
on R2 , Im doing matching to QOS by dscp , im matching acls ips from internet with dscp values :
here is CONFIG for matching :
Gateway7600#sh policy-map LLQX
Policy Map LLQX
Class YOUTUBE
set ip dscp af43
Class FACEBOOKVIDEOS
set ip dscp af33
Class HTTP
set dscp af23
Class DNSQOS
set dscp af13
Class class-default
set ip dscp af11
================
Gateway7600#sh class-map
Class Map match-all FACEBOOKVIDEOS (id 7)
Match access-group name facebookvideos
Class Map match-all DNSQOS (id 8)
Match access-group name dnsqos
Class Map match-all HTTP (id 6)
Match access-group name browsing
Class Map match-any class-default (id 0)
Match any
Class Map match-all YOUTUBE (id 5)
Match access-group name youtube
Gateway7600#
=========================================================
on this router i applied this policy map on interfaxce F1 in direction
and here matching is well :
Gateway7600#sh policy-map interface gigabitEthernet 1/5 in
GigabitEthernet1/5
Service-policy input: LLQX
class-map: rate-limit (match-all)
Match: access-group name rate-limit
police :
4088000 bps 384000 limit 384000 extended limit
Earl in slot 1 :
139044930 bytes
30 second offered rate 143032 bps
aggregate-forwarded 134420937 bytes action: transmit
exceeded 4623993 bytes action: drop
aggregate-forward 22544 bps exceed 0 bps
class-map: YOUTUBE (match-all)
Match: access-group name youtube
set dscp 38:
Earl in slot 1 :
132693939697 bytes
30 second offered rate 212144928 bps
aggregate-forwarded 132693939697 bytes
class-map: FACEBOOKVIDEOS (match-all)
Match: access-group name facebookvideos
set dscp 30:
Earl in slot 1 :
10726758352 bytes
30 second offered rate 20682720 bps
aggregate-forwarded 10726758352 bytes
class-map: HTTP (match-all)
Match: access-group name browsing
set dscp 22:
Earl in slot 1 :
56874058537 bytes
30 second offered rate 92669832 bps
aggregate-forwarded 56874058537 bytes
class-map: DNSQOS (match-all)
Match: access-group name dnsqos
set dscp 14:
Earl in slot 1 :
160308954 bytes
30 second offered rate 303552 bps
aggregate-forwarded 160308954 bytes
class-map: class-default (match-any)
Match: any
set dscp 10:
Earl in slot 1 :
67394864030 bytes
30 second offered rate 126884864 bps
aggregate-forwarded 67394864030 bytes
=================================================================================
now the problem is below
on router 7200 , it is LNS router connected with LAC roiuter for ADSL customers.
now here is config of policy map on 7200 router:
R11#sh policy-map
Policy Map MATCH_MARKS
Class MATCH_YOUTUBE
bandwidth 220000 (kbps)
Class MATCH_FACEBOOKVIDEOS
bandwidth 20000 (kbps)
Class MATCH_HTTP
bandwidth 100000 (kbps)
=========================================================
R1#sh class-map
Class Map match-all MATCH_FACEBOOKVIDEOS (id 2)
Match ip dscp af33 (30)
Class Map match-all MATCH_HTTP (id 3)
Match ip dscp af23 (22)
Class Map match-any class-default (id 0)
Match any
Class Map match-all MATCH_YOUTUBE (id 1)
Match ip dscp af43 (38)
==========================================================
here is virtual-template interface before i apply the QOS
R1#sh running-config interface virtual-template 1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 352 bytes
interface Virtual-Template1
bandwidth 1000000
ip unnumbered Loopback0
ip tcp adjust-mss 1412
ip policy route-map private
no logging event link-status
qos pre-classify
peer default ip address pool bitsead1 bitsead2
ppp mtu adaptive
ppp authentication pap vpdn
ppp authorization vpdn
ppp accounting vpdn
max-reserved-bandwidth 90
end
=========================================
when i apply the command
(service-poliy output MATCH_MAKRS ) under virtual-template interface i have console logs :
Insufficient bandwidth 149760 kbps for the bandwidth guarantee (220000)
Insufficient bandwidth 149760 kbps for the bandwidth guarantee (220000)
Insufficient bandwidth 149760 kbps for the bandwidth guarantee (220000)
also i have
*Jul 9 22:28:38.242: Interface Virtual-Access2551 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:38.250: Interface Virtual-Access627 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:38.258: Interface Virtual-Access786 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:38.266: Interface Virtual-Access623 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:38.274: Interface Virtual-Access2559 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:38.282: Interface Virtual-Access2281 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:38.290: Interface Virtual-Access142 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:40.262: %SYS-2-INTSCHED: 'suspend' at level 3 -Process= "VTEMPLATE Background Mgr", ipl= 3, pid= 278, -Traceback= 0x756FF0z 0x3439C58z 0x2778D70z 0x2CACCD0z 0x2CC63E0z 0x2CC7FF8z 0x2CADC74z 0x2CBE058z 0x2CA0340z 0x2CA04F8z 0x2E0BB18z 0x2D23378z 0x2D1825Cz 0x2D18738z 0x2E66FE0z 0x2D971ACz
*Jul 9 22:28:40.262: %SYS-2-INTSCHED: 'suspend' at level 3 -Process= "VTEMPLATE Background Mgr", ipl= 3, pid= 278, -Traceback= 0x756FF0z 0x3439C58z 0x2778D70z 0x2CACD28z 0x2CC63E0z 0x2CC7FF8z 0x2CADC74z 0x2CBE058z 0x2CA0340z 0x2CA04F8z 0x2E0BB18z 0x2D23378z 0x2D1825Cz 0x2D18738z 0x2E66FE0z 0x2D971ACz
after i apply it ,
the cpu is 100 % and the router got down !!!
now
what is the problem ????
here is ios for 7200 router
R1#sh version
Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200P-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T7, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2012 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Tue 28-Feb-12 12:53 by prod_rel_team
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.4(12.2r)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Bras1 uptime is 13 weeks, 1 day, 9 hours, 24 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload at 16:24:51 GMT+3 Tue Jun 17 2003
System image file is "disk2:c7200p-adventerprisek9-mz.124-24.T7.bin"
Last reload reason: Reload Command
This product contains cryptographic features and is subject to United
States and local country laws governing import, export, transfer and
use. Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does not imply
third-party authority to import, export, distribute or use encryption.
Importers, exporters, distributors and users are responsible for
compliance with U.S. and local country laws. By using this product you
agree to comply with applicable laws and regulations. If you are unable
to comply with U.S. and local laws, return this product immediately.
A summary of U.S. laws governing Cisco cryptographic products may be found at:
http://www.cisco.com/wwl/export/crypto/tool/stqrg.html
If you require further assistance please contact us by sending email to
[email protected].
Cisco 7206VXR (NPE-G2) processor (revision A) with 917504K/65536K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID 36858624
MPC7448 CPU at 1666Mhz, Implementation 0, Rev 2.2
6 slot VXR midplane, Version 2.11
Last reset from power-on
PCI bus mb1 (Slots 1, 3 and 5) has a capacity of 600 bandwidth points.
Current configuration on bus mb1 has a total of 0 bandwidth points.
This configuration is within the PCI bus capacity and is supported.
PCI bus mb2 (Slots 2, 4 and 6) has a capacity of 600 bandwidth points.
Current configuration on bus mb2 has a total of 0 bandwidth points.
This configuration is within the PCI bus capacity and is supported.
Please refer to the following document "Cisco 7200 Series Port Adaptor
Hardware Configuration Guidelines" on Cisco.com <http://www.cisco.com>
for c7200 bandwidth points oversubscription and usage guidelines.
1 FastEthernet interface
3 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
2045K bytes of NVRAM.
250880K bytes of ATA PCMCIA card at slot 2 (Sector size 512 bytes).
65536K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 512K).
Configuration register is 0x2102
==============================================================================
wish to Help ASAP
regardshi ,
i did
the same issue ,
i did a TEST policymap that has 30 percent gurantee
but the same result!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the router god down agian !
here is logs :
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:33.605: Interface Virtual-Access1896 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:33.797: Interface Virtual-Access1317 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:33.809: Interface Virtual-Access993 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:33.817: Interface Virtual-Access1699 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:33.981: Interface Virtual-Access254 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:33.993: Interface Virtual-Access687 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.001: Interface Virtual-Access35 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.009: Interface Virtual-Access160 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.017: Interface Virtual-Access1337 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.029: Interface Virtual-Access1670 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.037: Interface Virtual-Access1948 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.049: Interface Virtual-Access1669 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.109: Interface Virtual-Access1334 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.117: Interface Virtual-Access151 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.125: Interface Virtual-Access761 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.137: Interface Virtual-Access810 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.197: Interface Virtual-Access1522 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.237: Interface Virtual-Access1692 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.257: Interface Virtual-Access368 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.305: Interface Virtual-Access1758 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.317: Interface Virtual-Access2061 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.325: Interface Virtual-Access1203 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.337: Interface Virtual-Access188 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.345: Interface Virtual-Access1975 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.357: Interface Virtual-Access1172 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.509: Interface Virtual-Access1647 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.517: Interface Virtual-Access458 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.609: Interface Virtual-Access608 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.621: Interface Virtual-Access2128 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.633: Interface Virtual-Access1167 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.641: Interface Virtual-Access487 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.653: Interface Virtual-Access1793 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.665: Interface Virtual-Access2280 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.769: Interface Virtual-Access839 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.781: Interface Virtual-Access2311 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.793: Interface Virtual-Access1788 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.857: Interface Virtual-Access8 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.869: Interface Virtual-Access2243 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.881: Interface Virtual-Access580 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:35.057: Interface Virtual-Access6 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:35.065: Interface Virtual-Access1331 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:35.077: Interface Virtual-Access1235 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:35.177: Interface Virtual-Access1748 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:35.189: Interface Virtual-Access2262 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:35.205: Interface Virtual-Access2136 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
i want to ask a question , could this be from IOS ???? -
Putting QOS for voice traffic in switches.
Hi All,
does anybody know how to prioritize the voice traffic over data in the 2960 SW, in a scenario in which ethernet cable coming to ipphone & from IPphone to PC.Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Yes, I do.
laugh - I was temped to stop with the above, as it directly answers your question, but I assume you want to know how.
In principle, you recognize the VoIP traffic as being different from data traffic and provide it "special" egress treatment. Normally you would enable QoS, and for egress, enable PQ, direct VoIP bearer traffic to that queue. You might also direct VoIP signalling traffic to a queue that insures it's not unduly delayed or dropped. You might also set rate caps on ingress VoIP traffic.
Recognition of VoIP traffic can be done in different ways. Your phones might support L2 CoS or L3 ToS marking, your switch might "analyze" ingress traffic, your switch might trust a Cisco VoIP phone, your switch and VoIP phones might use a dedicated VLAN. Basically, there's lots of variables dealing with ingress.
Unfortunately, you've provided insufficient information for specific recommendations.
PS:
BTW, your 2960 might also support auto-QoS, which may, or may not, be all you need to enable. -
Apply QoS policies to MPLS interfaces
Hello all,
We are deploying an MPLS transport network for our research project, and we are getting undefined errors about the QoS application over tunnel interfaces. The tunnel interfaces are those we configure between end points.
For example, if we apply a rate-limit to a tunnel interface, this is not applied, although the router anc CLI let configure the policy.
Does anybody know how to manage this kind of policies or shaping to MPLS?
Thanks for your help.Hello,
No, in fact, what we want to configure is output policies. For example, at the ingress LER of the MPLS cloud, we receive some traffic that we set it as an specific class of service, for example, "interactive traffic". Once the traffic is classified, we route it to the correct output tunnel interface, i.e., to the next LSR. It's at that interface where we want to set the policy, so.
When we set the policy, with the "service-policy output tunnel0", for example, the CLI doesn't return any message of error. In fact, it lets to configure it, and if we use the command "show policy-map interface tunnel0", CLI returns the configuration of the policy at that interface.
Thanks for your help. -
Reroute some vrf traffic between 2 sites over redundant link
hey guys,
We have a single client (in vrf) with 2 sites in different states and running over our mpls core.. Our primary link in our core is experiencing degredation of service and want to route this client over our redundant link while keeping all other clients going over our primary link - is this possible?
The client in question has its own vrf (L3VPN) at both sites and is running over mpls between both sites. We want to re-route this particular client to take our backup path, while keeping everyone else between both sites going over the primary. We are not using TE, instead LDP to build MPLS.
I don't believe this is possible to only re-route one client, however I thought I would ask the question.
We cannot failover to secondary link for everyone between both sites because the link doesn't have the capacity.
Thanks in advance.Hi,
Using MPLS TE would certainly be an option. You would need to setup an MPLS TE LSP over the backup. You would also need to configure a separate lookback interface on each PE and use this loopback interface address as the next hop for the specific VRF
ip vrf X
bgp next-hop loopback 999
ip route 255.255.255.255 Tu1
This way you would make sure that only the traffic for this specific VRF would travel over the TE tunnel.
Regards -
Need help in Applying QOS to an ISP on ASR 1002
Hi
i want to ask
if someone gave me CIR with 900Mbps internet upload & download
the question is being asked is.
when the congestion occurs ( when my bw is full)
where does the congestion occur ??
on my router ?
or ISP router ?
or the internet ?
or other place ???
that issue is deiving me mad , because im doing qos on my side to guarantee bw and shape but it dont give me a result ?!
i mean , the qos is maching ok and soo nice
but ..... the performance.
agian
the performance as there is no guarantee and no bw guaranteed.
i asked an expert and told me you have to ask your provider to do that thier side ?!!! im really shocked to hear that ... he told me that congestion occurs outside my router.
so , im here to ask agian and agian.
what choices i have to fix my issue ??
wish to help
regardsDisclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
At "big speeds", there's a difference between shaping and policing. However, generally within an ISP, policing is used to restrict bandwidth usage, of a customer, to some agreed upon CIR (when CIR is less than physical capacity). With policing you don't need to manage any generated congestion (as over rate packets are just discarded). Policing is also "lightweight" in its resource demands and is often directly supported by the hardware.
I do agree ISPs, that provide SLAs, avoid over subscription because otherwise SLAs might not be meet. However, if SLAs are not provided, over subscription isn't uncommon. If too much of the latter is done, customers may indeed change ISPs, but do they have a choice? Or, how do the different ISP fees compare? (ISPs do analyze customer impact, i.e. customer retention, with cost of providing the service. They try to determine what's most profitable, not what the customer would like most. [Do you have gig to your home yet? If not, why not? Is it because it cannot be technically done, or is cost and/or what other ISPs offer in the area a factor? (If you're lucky, maybe you have Google fiber, but even that might be a "loss leader".)])
BTW, at "big speeds", another reason shaping is avoided, and also why over subscription is avoided, is because of the needed queuing. For example, say you wanted to queue up to 100 ms of traffic. Well on a 100 Gbps link, that's 10 Gb of data. -
I have two 3750ME switches connecting two ends of a LES100. On each switch, i have 3845 routers with the NM-CEM-4SER modules, plus direct to switch internet traffic. My complete setup is as shown in the attached PDF.
My problem is that with the default QoS settings, i have lots of drops in the Txqueue of the switches.
The CEM's send traffic as EF, which is trusted throughout the switch setup. Other traffic that comes into the switch is marked down to best effort. Thus, most of the traffic the switches handle is EF,(about 70%, 20MB for now). How do i tune the QoS parameters on the switch to handle this amount and more of EF traffic?Regaring the QOS, I think we should implement this on the 3750 . It is worth advising you to first upgrade the IOS on this device. The following URL will help you:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750/software/release/12.2_25_sec/configuration/guide/swqos.html
As you are unable to specify the "bandwidth/priority" on 3750 cli, you will need to use the Queuing and Scheduling (SRR) section from the config guide. So basically you enable the expidite queue for the CEM traffic egreesing the 3750. However I believe you cannot classify the traffic via acl to assign it to queues, so you will need to mark it.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Loading two UOM in Multiprovider possible?
Hi Friends, I need to develop a multiprovider with a cube and dso. Cube-- has Base UOM DSO- has alternate UOM. I am able to drag only Base UOM from the cube. I am not able to drag the alternate UOm from DSO into multiprovider. Please help me. Thanks,
-
Can I buy an item and pay for it later?
I am planning to buy a gift card later in the week and I have no credit card or money in my account. Could I still buy the item now and the difference be subtracted when I redeem the gift card later?
-
Hi everyone! I was wondering if anyone knows how to collapse multiple folders in the Files panel. Whenever I do a template update, it expands every folder containing a page that uses the template. So when you have 50-100 folders or so with several pa
-
Upgraded Call Assistant not working
The other day when I went to check the call assistant it required an upgrade so I let it run. Now when ever I get a call it does not show it as incoming nor does it show anything in the log. Does anyone know why it is not working?
-
I want to download org.w3c.dom package
I want org.w3c.dom package plz send me the name of the jar file containing the org.w3c.dom package