Archiving control not maintained for CIR document .T-code MD82
Hi All,
I have archived sales order till 31/12/09 in the production system, but the Customer Independent Requirement that is
CIR documents (MD82) are also there in vbak table ,now i have closed all the open document by putting rejection reason.
When i am trying to archive the document it is giving the error "Archiving control not maintained for the document" .please
suggest where to maintain these archiving control and what is to be maintained.
Thanks and Regards
Abhilash Nayak
Hi,
Check your entries in tcode VORA.
Regards,
Eduardo
Similar Messages
-
COPY CONTROL NOT PRESENT FOR SALES DOCUMENT TYPE DS
I am new beginner to the module SD, i am stuck on the issue regarding copy control
I have created an Schedule Line Agreement and want to copy it to the sale document OR standard order, once entering the number for the schedule line document , i am getting a message the copy control rule does exist for DS to OR.
I have been to the setting for copy control with T-code VTAA but there are many fields that required to be filled up,
Which fields do i fill in ?
I have filled in the fields for item category for OR (TAN) and for DS (LPN).
If i use the copy control with these settings i am getting an error message "The copying routine number for table VBAP is missing in table TVCPA"
Any Help would really would be helpful
Regards,
SahilSahil,
I suggest you close this question, since this is an MM forum. You are unlikely to get many answers here.
I also suggest that you first perform a search, before re-posting this question elsewhere.
First, search within the forums (search box on the upper right of this screen). I just tried a search on 'copy control' and got over 20,000 hits. Surely one of these posts will be able to help you.
Next, check online help. This help is generic, and not generally specific to a particular industry:
http://help.sap.com ERP SD Help starts at
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60/helpdata/en/8c/df293581dc1f79e10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
Next, look for generic solutions in Best Practices. This main Library is
http://help.sap.com/bp_bl604/BL_IN/html/Content_Library_BL_EN_IN.htm
Next look for industry specific solutions in Best Practices:
http://help.sap.com/content/bestpractices/industry/index.htm
If you are experiencing a problem, or you believe that SAP is not working per the online help, you can then search OSS notes.
http://service.sap.com/notes
Next search in one of the standard online search engines (such as Google).
Only after you have performed all of these searches, and studied all of the online help that is supplied for free by SAP, then consider posting a question to these forums. A good SD forum is
SAP ERP Sales and Distribution (SAP SD)
Best Regards,
DB49 -
Solutiom for EXCISE INVOICE NOT CREATEED FOR THIS DOCUMENT
hi,
wlhile i want print preview in transaction VF03/VF02 for a particular biiling document number , i get the error message "EXCISE INVOICE NOT CREATEED FOR THIS DOCUMENT" .what is the solution?HI Tej
All the Import cycle has created three documents.
1. MIRO doc for custom duties and CVD .-- MIRO posted in USD . I can see the doc in both currency - INr and USD via accounting doc - display currency. I do not have any issue.
2. MIGO doc - for custom duty and Freight - MIGO posted in INR , I can see accounting doc in USD and INR both via accounting document- Display currency and even in the MIGO -- purchase order history tab.
3. Excise Invoice - for CVD - EX Invoice posted in diifferent way --
In this document please note amounts for CVD is as per USD rate , but currency showing is INR , which is a mismatch.
in Excise customization for company code setting - exchange rate type M is maintained. OB08 is also maintained for USD/INR
Condition type JCV1 is also marked with currency conversion and accruals.
Is there any patch or note I need to apply to getting this converted , or any process issue.
Regds
Mukta -
Combination of GR/IR Control not allowed for External Services-SRM PO error
Hi All,
SRM 5.0 ECS R/3 4.6C
We have a service PO, for which an error Combination of GR/IR Control not allowed for External Services is being displayed.
The PO is in error in process at this moment. And is not in R/3
On SRM PO we have Confirm Performance of Service/Goods Receipt checked and Invoice Expected checked.
Confirmation-Related Invoice Verification is not checked. Any thoughts on this!!
Thanks
KrishnaHi
<u>Please go through the following SAP OSS Notes -></u>
Note 725824 - MB5S: Error with purchase orders for external service
Note 781014 - Clearing values in purchase order currency are too high
Note 991800 - MB5S: Error in delivery costs (2)
Note 960789 - Wrong Values in MM Document for Service Based Invoice
Note 778562 - MM-IV: invoices are entered before the goods receipt
Note 578531 - Incorrect FM update for service purchase orders
Note 635864 - ME2S: Invoice value is calculated incorrectly
Note 570409 - Unplanned account assignment in invoice for service PO
Note 545684 - MIR4 for SRV: Incorrect data displayed if deletion indicator
Note 544567 - Transaction MIRO: incorr. default values at (parked) invoice
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul -
Close shop order Fiscal year variant B2 is not maintained for calendar year
Hello,
I know there are already some threads in the forum about this error, but I could not find an answer that works for me.
Here is the scenario:
We do want to close a production order in CO02. (CO02-functions-restrict processing-close).
I get an error message u201CUnprocessed future change recs for order xxprevent del. flag/completionu201D
Message no. CO688
Transaction COFC shows me 6 errors (all the same) for this production order, I guess this might be the reason for the previous error:
u201CFiscal year variant B2 is not maintained for calendar year 2006u201D
When I now go into OB29, it shows entries for B2 for the year 2006, it has 12 periods, so it looks fine for me.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Anne- check out this note
https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=487683
Note 487683 - CO688 for 'complete technically' or set deletion flag
Symptom
An order should be technically completed or the deletion flag should be activated for the order.
The action cannot be carried out since the system issues error message CO688 "Unprocessed future change recs for order & prevent deletion flag/completion".
Even after you have started report CORUPROC for processing the unprocessed future change records, the action cannot be carried out.
Other terms
Archiving, complete technically,
LÖVM, TABG, CO688, CO 688
Reason and Prerequisites
The action cannot be carried out since there are incorrect goods movements or incorrect actual costs for the order.However, this option is not mentioned in the long text of message CO688.
Solution
With the aid of Transactions COGI and COFC, you must check whether there are incorrect goods movements or incorrect actual costs for the order and you must post-process them.
You can change the long text of the message as follows by using Transaction SE91 in order to add missing information:
Diagnosis
For the order, you must still process future change records or error records from the confirmation for confirmation processes.These are the possible confirmation processes:
automatic goods receipt
backflush
actual cost determination
data transfer to HR
System activities
For orders with confirmation processes to be post-processed, setting of the deletion flag or of status 'completed' has not been planned.
Procedure
You must process the unprocessed future change records with the help of
predefined confirmation processes</> or
with the aid of program CORUPROC, when you dispatch it in Customizing in a background job (dispatch background jobs: confirmation processes).
You must check whether there are incorrect goods movements or incorrect actual cost determination for the order and you might have to post-process them:
post-processing of incorrect goods movements</>
post-processing of incorrect actual cost determinations</> -
No control data maintained for checking group ZI and checking rule A
Dear all,
When i do the availability check in the sales order i got the message as No control data maintained for checking group ZI and checking rule A and finally availability check was not carried out, I check all the configuration under the sd-availabilitycheck and i maintained in material master also..........
Please give me the solution
Best Regards ,
KumarHi,
Did u maintain the scope of availability check like incluke reqts,planned reqts, purchase requisitions, production order, sales reqts,delivery reqts etc.
apart from that you have to put check(Tick) mark in Requirment class and scheduleline categorie
Then u have to maintain in material master individual requirmentss or daily requirments
checking rule like A,B or if its consignment AW if it is returnable packaging AV etc(ImgS&D-Basicfunctions-Availabiltycheck&Tor---availability check aginst ATP)
Then Total summarized daily reqts or summarized individual requts
Plz check above all setting then u will get clear idea.
Regards,
Murthy -
Message no. 8I766 Number Ranges are not maintained For Extended Withholding
Dear All,
I am facing the following problem when i am trying to generate the withholding tax certificate
1.) Message no. 8I766 Number Ranges are not maintained For Extended Withholding Tax
Number Ranges are not maintained for Business Place and Section. Check entries in tables J_1iewt_cert (for Business Place) or J_1iewt_cert_n (for Section Code) and j_1iewt_certno in EWT.
I have checked all the above tables and found that the entries are maintained
2) When i am trying for print priview and then print its generating spool request and the certificate is getting saved -
> here the following problems are faced
A) . TDS Number is not coming
B).Details Of the tax deductor ( Name , Adress , TDS Circle , TAN & PAN is not coming Where to update these details
C) In Amount Paid / Credited Column - Some fixed amount is comming irrespective of the actual amount credited
Please help me in soving the above issues
Thanks & Regards
Arun.RHi
You need to maintain Section Code wise number range . Go to Sm30 Select Table J_1IEWT_CERT_N and maintain it.
Thanks
GG -
Fiscal year variant is not maintained for calendar year 2009
Hi,
After upgrade to BI 7.0 we are getting error: "Fiscal year variant & is not maintained for calendar year 2009" while opening a query through Bex Analyzer.
Basically it is happening like when we open a particular query, the Variable selection screen comes up, then on clicking the exection button (after selection) it shows SYSTEM_FAILURE exception & clicking the details button, shows the message ""Fiscal year variant is not maintained for calendar year 2009"
Please provide some information/resolution to this.
Thanks,
Shantanu.HI,
Please ensure that you have defined your fiscal year variant in OB29
correctly. It is necessary that:
1. the previous year has been maintained,
2. an entry for Dec 31 exists in each fiscal year,
3. the following fiscal year has been maintained.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Nitin -
Limit PO Err Combination of GR/IR control not allowed for external services
Hi,
I am having a problem while replicating free text Limit PO's to R/3 in SRM 4.0 SP 13. The issue is while creating Free Text Limit SC with the "Confirmation and Invoice" option checked in, the PO's get created in SRM but fails while replicating to R/3 and in RZ20 errors as "Combination of GR/IR control not allowed for external services" although in vendor master i don't have check for the field "GR-Based Invoice Verification".
On the contrary while creating SC with the "Invoice Only" the PO is successfully replicated to R/3 with item category as B for limit orders.
Now i have noticed if i make changes in the vendor master data i.e. check the flag "GR-Based Invoice Verification" then the PO in my first scenario gets replicated successfully and also with respect to the second scenario but it gets replicated in both the scenarios as item category "D".
As far as SRM standard it should have ideally behave like the below:
Limit SC with GR AND Invoice -> item category D
Limit SC with invoice only -> item category B.
Now my question is why do my PO's fail in R/3 in the first scenario and also if i check the flag in vendor master for GR-Based Invoice verification then in the second scenario the item category is "D" instead of "B".
Thanks in Advance.
Best Regards
AnirbanHi Georg,
We don't have any active implementation for the BADI BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI.
Best Regards,
Anirban -
Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012
I am getting this error while scheduling infopackage for 2lis_02_HDR.
Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012
PLease let me know how to solve thhe issue.
Thanks,
harika.Hi,
Where are you geting error, before execution or duing execution of DTP in the log.
Check if you have transferred fiscal year variants from source system to BW. Then trigger DTP.
Regards,
Pravin Karkhanis.
Edited by: Pravin Karkhanis on Oct 18, 2011 4:15 AM
Edited by: Pravin Karkhanis on Oct 18, 2011 4:15 AM -
Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012 when loadin
Dear Experts,
We are working on BI7.0 extracting data from ECC 6.0.
I am trying to load data from 0HR_PY_PP_1 which is a Self DataSource in our BW System (extracts data from 0EMPLOYEE and 0PERSON) to load into ZPA_C50 which is a copy of BCT InfoCube 0PAPA_C02 (Headcount).
The data has come through into the PSA very well.
However, DTP is throwing an error while loading 32242 records of data from PSA into ZPA_C50 InfoCube. The error details as below:
Error while updating to target ZPA_C50 (type INFOCUBE)
Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012 FGV 2
Messages for 1 data records saved; request is red acc. to configuration
Processing Terminated
We are actually doing a Re-implementation of BW 3.0b in BI 7.0 Ehp1. We have imported Maintenance of Fiscal Year Variant from the BW 3.0b Production System. So this shouldn't be a problem I guess since I have also checked the setting in SPRO in BI 7.0 Development (New) System and they are looking good.
Also, when I do a Filter on 0CALDAY in DTP from 01.01.1900 to 31.12.2010, the loads are working fine. I want the load to run without any Filters on 0CALDAY.
Has anyone been in similar situation. How did you resolve this issue? Your time is very much appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
ChanduDear Experts
Thanks for your time.
We have resolved this issue ourselves. We have maintained 'Shortened Fiscal Years' for 'Z1' and it is working fine now. Steps are as below:
In BI Dev System -> SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG -> SAP Customizing Implementation Guide -> SAP NetWeaver -> Business Intelligence -> General BI Settings -> Maintain fiscal year variant -> Select 'Z1' Fiscal Year Variant and then DoubleClick on 'Shortened Fiscal Years' to set the Fisc Year Variant -> Save.
The dataload should work fine now.
Cheers,
Chandu -
Hi Team,
We have a requirement to "Populate Error Message(Supervisor not Maintained) while submitting Travel Request if Supervisor(A002) relationship is not maintained for employee in ESS.
We are using standard WDA application - FITV_REQUEST and standard travel request workfow - WS20000050.
Please suggest how to do this.
Thanks,
RaviHi Rajesh,
Thanks for the reply...
We created enhancement for FM HRTRV_IF_GET_CUSTOMIZING and written code in that.
So by this if Logged in Employee is not assgned with Line Manager , it will throw error while accessing "Create Travel Request application".
Thanks,
Ravi. -
Fiscal year variant V3 is not maintained for calendar year 2010
Hello Gurus,
I tried to load the data from data source to Targer i got bellow Error Message and i checked the data in R/3 side 2010 data is available ,
Diagnosis
An error occurred in BI while processing the data. The error is documented in an error message.
System Response
A caller 01, 02 or equal to or greater than 20 contains an error message.
Further analysis:
The error message(s) was (were) sent by:
Second step in the update
Second step in the update
Second step in the update
Second step in the update
Procedure
Check the error message (pushbutton below the text).
Select the message in the message dialog box, and look at the long text for further information.
Follow the instructions in the message.
1) Fiscal year variant V3 is not maintained for calendar year 2010
2)Error when assigning SID: Action VAL_SID_CONVERT table 0FISCPER
3)Error when assigning SID: Action VAL_SID_CONVERT table 0FISCYEAR
4)Activation of M records from Data Store object 0FIAP_O03 terminated
5)Process 000052 returned with errors
6)Process 000119 returned with errors
Please suggest.
Thanks
Prakashprakash,
i hope 2010 fiscal variants are not mainiatined in ur bi system
please do this operation..
Go to RSA1-> source systems->select R/3 system -> right click->Transfer global settings->Fiscal year varaints->rebuild tables
then try to repeat the load...the load will be fine if the calender is maintained in R/3 if not raise this issue to the functional people... -
Fiscal year "A3" Variant is not maintained for Financila year 2010
Hello All,
while creating asset master using AS01 T Code i am getting an error "Fiscal year "A3" Variant is not maintained for Financila year 2010 for Compnay Code 0600".
but i have configured Fical year variant and assigned to co code, i am able to post the transactions for all the periods i.e financial year 2010.
here my question is whether we need to maintain the Fiscal year variant separately for Asset accounting in ECC 6.0.
Please Suggest
Thanks
ShankarHi Murali and Christian,
Thanks for your reply..
now i have configured year dependent fiscal year to my co code, if i configure calender year i am able to create the Asset master
please help
Thanks
Shankar -
Object type not maintained for message type
Hi,
I am working on chnage pointers for Vendor classification data. when I execute the program RBDMIDOC (BD21) I get the error Object type LIFNR not maintained for Message type.
If anyone has worked on change pointers, please guide me in solving this error.
Thanks
HariHi
Which msg type u r using there.
Regads,
Prasad.
Maybe you are looking for
-
I cannot send email from my yahoo account
How do I correct the problem. I can receive mail but cannot send, also cannot send text messages from my iMac iPhone and iPad are working fine on same account.
-
Including or excluding a characteristic in duplicate invoice check
When entering vendor invoice in FB60, system checks entry of company code, vendor, document date and reference number for duplicate invoice. If duplicate invoice is detected, message F5117 will be issued. We would like to change the duplicate invoic
-
[CS3 JS] Making sub-/subsub topic (setting parent topic)
Hi all, I'm trying to have my script add an index, that consists of nested topics: Parent Child Sub-child From what I can read in the Object Model there's a 'withProperties' parameter, but I just can't seem to get it working ... var myDocument = app.
-
Hi there, I would like to know whether Ipod video(5th generation) can support the RealAudio / RealVideo VBR type of movie file because I got a lot of these files, and hope they can be played in my "future" ipod. Thanks!
-
Hi experts, Can I put ENV and DB files on shared file system such like IBM's GPFS(General Parallel File System)? I want to make two nodes to update same database by sharing it using shared disk technology. Following URL is about GPFS. http://www.redb