Combination of GR/IR Control not allowed for External Services-SRM PO error

Hi All,
SRM 5.0 ECS R/3 4.6C
We have a service PO, for which an error Combination of GR/IR Control not allowed for External Services is being displayed.
The PO is in error in process at this moment. And is not in R/3
On SRM PO we have Confirm Performance of Service/Goods Receipt checked and Invoice Expected checked.
Confirmation-Related Invoice Verification is not checked. Any thoughts on this!!
Thanks
Krishna

Hi
Please go through the following SAP OSS Notes ->
Note 725824 - MB5S: Error with purchase orders for external service
Note 781014 - Clearing values in purchase order currency are too high
Note 991800 - MB5S: Error in delivery costs (2)
Note 960789 - Wrong Values in MM Document for Service Based Invoice
Note 778562 - MM-IV: invoices are entered before the goods receipt
Note 578531 - Incorrect FM update for service purchase orders
Note 635864 - ME2S: Invoice value is calculated incorrectly
Note 570409 - Unplanned account assignment in invoice for service PO
Note 545684 - MIR4 for SRV: Incorrect data displayed if deletion indicator
Note 544567 - Transaction MIRO: incorr. default values at (parked) invoice
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Similar Messages

Limit PO Err Combination of GR/IR control not allowed for external services

Hi,
I am having a problem while replicating free text Limit PO's to R/3 in SRM 4.0 SP 13. The issue is while creating Free Text Limit SC with the "Confirmation and Invoice" option checked in, the PO's get created in SRM but fails while replicating to R/3 and in RZ20 errors as "Combination of GR/IR control not allowed for external services" although in vendor master i don't have check for the field "GR-Based Invoice Verification".
On the contrary while creating SC with the "Invoice Only" the PO is successfully replicated to R/3 with item category as B for limit orders.
Now i have noticed if i make changes in the vendor master data i.e. check the flag "GR-Based Invoice Verification" then the PO in my first scenario gets replicated successfully and also with respect to the second scenario but it gets replicated in both the scenarios as item category "D".
As far as SRM standard it should have ideally behave like the below:
Limit SC with GR AND Invoice -> item category D
Limit SC with invoice only -> item category B.
Now my question is why do my PO's fail in R/3 in the first scenario and also if i check the flag in vendor master for GR-Based Invoice verification then in the second scenario the item category is "D" instead of "B".
Thanks in Advance.
Best Regards
Anirban

Hi Georg,
We don't have any active implementation for the BADI BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI.
Best Regards,
Anirban

Combination of GR/IR control not allowed for external services

Hi,
I need to uncheck the field GR-Based IV (EKPO-WEBRE) in the SERVICE PO but I receive the message :
"Combination of GR/IR control not allowed for external services"
I want to allow the user to receive Invoices (MIRO) before the Service Entry (ML81N).
Thanks.
Carlos Durazo

HI,
This is a "hard coded" option and cannot be removed.
If you want to be able to post invoices for services before the GR (acceptance) then you could consider using "normal" POs for these (without item category "D") abd use material masters (DIEN material type) or describe the service in text.
External services POs are only really suited to complex services or services that need a two step GR process (Service entry and acceptance).
Far too many organisations use the service entry sheet option when "normal POs" would be far better.
Steve B

Limit PO :Combination of GR/IR is not allowed for external services

Hi,
we are working in SRM40 sp09 & back end ECC.50
In the Limit PO:
we are able to create Limit PO from a shopping cart.The follow on documents in ECC, it is creating a PO with Item category "B" and the "invoices" are only possible.
The Issue:
The Client wants the Confirmation/GR functionality to be enabled and the Invoices.
but for Limit PO, with follow on documents--"Confirmation" is checked, we have a error messagecombination of GR/IR is not allowed for external services".
Is there any addition configuration or steps involved.
Thanks and Regards,
RK.

Hi
Please go through the links below, which address the same issue ->
Limit PO(Item category D instead of B)
SRM: Item category B/D for limit PO
Re: Problem with Unknown account assignment with limit order...reply soon...
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

BAPI CASESERVICE CREATEMULT - Alternative price not allowed for the service

Hi,
I am using .Net Connector to connect to BAPI. I am developing a .Net order processing application and intend to send the order information to SAP using BAPI_CASESERVICE_CREATEMULT.
However, I keep getting the error message "An alternative price is not allowed for the service..". The service id is already setup at SAP and I am not sending any price information. I am only sending quantity. The DIFF_PRICE is set to 0.
Any advice? I appreciate your help.

Hi,
I am using .Net Connector to connect to BAPI. I am developing a .Net order processing application and intend to send the order information to SAP using BAPI_CASESERVICE_CREATEMULT.
However, I keep getting the error message "An alternative price is not allowed for the service..". The service id is already setup at SAP and I am not sending any price information. I am only sending quantity. The DIFF_PRICE is set to 0.
Any advice? I appreciate your help.

Posting in foreign currency not allowed for external tax system

Hello all,
I created a purchase order for inter-company stock transfer. Then created a corresponding outbound delivery and goods issue using VL10h and completed goods issue. Then I completed good receipt using MIGO. When I was trying to create a sales order I got this message "Posting in foreign currency not allowed for external tax system". What could be the reasons for this message. The message number said FS885.
One final note. I am able to create Billing document with manual batch number input in Delivery document item. But when I am using Batch split I am not able to generate invoice. Can anyone tell me what could be the problem here.

Hi Samir,
The Goods Received NI (Allocation Cost Account) need to be balaned in Local and System Currency as this is a Multi Currency account and these are the currencies that Business One will offer reports in.
The Foreign Currency for this account is irrelevant as you can never get a balance in FC for a multi currency account, neither will you find any reports for this.
If the client insists you can create a manual Journal entry in FC only to correct this. Business One does not offer any functionality to correct the Foreign Currency in this scenario. (like Exchange Rate difference for Local Currency and Conversion Differences for System Currency)
To do the manual JE open the form settings and the tab 'table', here untick the box 'From FC Field'. This will enable you to create a FC JE only.
Hope it clarifies the issue.
Jesper

*IT 0017 Error Combination of vehicle type & class not allowed*

Hi
I jus have moved my config from developement to quality. Here when i m trying to save IT 0017 Travel Privilege m gettin this error as Combination of vehicle type & class not allowed for reimbursment. Cause of that m nto able to save this infotype.
I checked my config in both client its same but onlt in quality m not able to save this IT. I checked whole cycle in Development its workin properly there.
Thanks in advance.
Neha

Hi
in my case it ws tranport request prob. Request was not getting transported properly. so i opened th client n created table entries for vehicle. U also once again check those vehicle type tables again. M sure that table entries are missing so its givin that error.
Regards
Neha

Que-''actual activity allocation is not allowed for order .''

hi ,
During confirmation of operation at co11n (also at co11), got one error massage i.e "actual activity allocation is not allowed for order "
Due to this error confirmation is not possible .
pls help me to solve this problem.
AMOL WAGH
Edited by: amol wagh on Dec 6, 2008 8:09 PM
Edited by: amol wagh on Dec 6, 2008 8:10 PM

Dear,
For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
Please give the feed back.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Actual activity allocation is not allowed for order .

hi ,
During confirmation of operation at co11n (also at co11), got one error massage i.e "actual activity allocation is not allowed for order "
Due to this error confirmation is not possible .
pls help me to solve this problem.
AMOL WAGH

Dear,
What is message number? Did you assign the usersttus in BS02?
For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
When we do price calculation in KSPI, system checks the planned costs for cost center (in KP06) and also checks the machine hours planned (in KP26) and gives the cost for the particular activity type.
Please check the above in the system
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

"ASSIGN not allowed for substrings" error in CONVERSION_EXIT_MATN1_INPUT

Hi,
I have a custom function module Z_CONVERT_VALUE_TO_INTERNAL that converts an external value to an internal value - it has a data-element parameter.
When I use this function module for the data element MATNR, it calls the standard function module CONVERSION_EXIT_MATN1_INPUT, which then causes a short dump at this line of code:
ASSIGN INPUT(LNG_E) TO <E_PTR>. "->Eingabe
The short dump says "ASSIGN not allowed for substrings", and the runtime error is ASSIGN_SUBSTRING_NOT_ALLOWED.
Any explanation? Does this line of code work in some circumstances?
Thanks,
John

I've found the explanation.
For both the function modules above, the input parameter for the external value has no type specified.
It appears therefore that the type is inherited from the calling program.
As my calling program was passing the external value in a variable of type STRING, the value was also being passed to CONVERSION_EXIT_MATN1_INPUT as type STRING.
Hence the error "ASSIGN not allowed for substrings".
When I changed the type of the variable to character (TYPE C), that solved it.

"Prodcut allocation check not allowed for ATPcat.'BR' and application".

SAP Experts,
Whenever, I delete a delivery, I am seeing a pop-up message with the information message as "Prodcut allocation check not allowed for ATPcat.'BR' and application". Is this a standard functionality. We dont have ATP Check/Allocation check during delivery delete. How come we get this message ?
This is something curious. Can someone help me on this please ??
Thanks,
Babu Kilari

Delete the ATP category BR from check control for A (Sales document). It seems when you are deleting a delivery the transfer of requirements settings pop this
Let me know if you are successful
Regards,
Loknath

System shud not allow for batch change after bacth determiantion.

Dear ALL,
I have one Isuue at my client , there requiremtn is -
"Performing the process it was detected that the raw material and packaging material batches could be changed after the process order created, which allows to picking a batch instead FEFO. "
Is there any way that system not allow for any change related to batch and its qunitity.
Awaiting for fevorable respoce.
Regards,
Prerna Verma

Hi Prerena,
Activating Check Batch Tab in COR4 will performs an additional check in order itself.This check works after completing Batch Determination.For example during Batch Determination system has selected (as per your sort rule) Batch X for issue.But later User tries to change this Batch No. to Batch Y(by overwriting the batch no. in Batch field).But if you have activated this Check Batch function then system will perform the check immediately whether this new Batch complies the Batch Determination rule or not.And if found wrong then gives you an error or warning msg(depends oin your msg control).
my second point is regarding Transaction code COB1 to deactivate the Allow change function.See if you activate the this tab then you finds that qty fields editable during Batch determination.So you can change the qty. manually during batch detemination.
So in your case 2 level checks required.
1) During Batch Determination (COB1) - Deactivate Allow change
2) After Batch Determination(COR4) - Activate Check Batch
Regards,
Dhaval
Edited by: Dhaval on Sep 27, 2010 8:43 PM

Payment method(s) are not allowed for this program / Program RFFOAVIS_FPAYM

Dear Friends,
In Se38 abap editor, I entered the program RFFOM100, i entered the details program run date,identification future,paying company code,payment methods T, House bank, Account Id and executed the program. I am getting the error 'Payment method(s) are not allowed for this program'.
Payment method S is not used in F110, It was not mentioned in vendor master or vendor invoice.It is not mentioned in fbzp in bank determination. When i tried to delete payment method 'S' the system shows a message Payment Method S is being used in the company code.
In the program RFFOAVIS_FPAYM, i entered the details program run date,identification future,paying company code,payment methods T, House bank, Account Id and executed the program. I am getting the error 'Program RFFOAVIS_FPAYM: No records selected'. But there open items or invoices.
Please suggest how to resolve the errors.
Regards
Sridhar

Hello,
Why are you directly executing these programs?
You will not expect these program to execute directly by going to SE38.
I would have configured the relevant payment methods in the country with DME structure or classical RFFO* programs, which in turn pick up the inherent programs at the time of running F110.
For example, if you need to generate BACS file for country GB, either you copy the GB_BACS to ZGB_BACS or use GB_BACS directly in FBZP settings.
Make sure that you have maintained OBPM1 / OBPM2 / OBPM3 and OBPM4 settings properly.
The system automatically gives the access to system RFFOAVIS_FPAYM. Prepare a variant against this program in F110. Relevant file gets generated to folder path mentioned in OBPM4 will get generated. The file get generated can be seen in AL11.
Hope this is informative and solves your issue.
Regards,
Ravi

The value 4010 39 99 is not allowed for the field MARC-STEUC/BAPI_MARC-CTR

Hi all,
BAPI' BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA' throws error the below error while creating material.
'The value 4010 39 99 is not allowed for the field MARC-STEUC/BAPI_MARC-CTRL_CODE'
Any idea abt this error.
Regards,
Thiyagu

Hi,
As this BAPI is triggered from external sytem that by client in production environment , I would not be able to dig it further.
Thats why I asked if anybody confronted the same error previously.
Thanks for suggestion.

ABAP Dictionary type FLTP is not allowed for screen element

Hi Experts
I tried to open VBFA in se16 and i got the message in the status bar like this , what does it mean. please explain.
"ABAP Dictionary type FLTP is not allowed for screen element"

Hi,
This is from help
ABAP Dictionary type FLTP is not allowed for screen element
Message no. 37048
Diagnosis
The format of the ABAP Dictionary field is only for use within the ABAP
program and cannot be used in the Screen Painter.
Procedure
The field cannot be used in screens. If you want to output the
information in the field or assign a value to the field from the screen,
you must use an intermediate field with an appropriate format.
Reward points
Regards

Combination of GR/IR Control not allowed for External Services-SRM PO error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for