Assignments in transformations

Hi,
I'm working on a BW 7.4 SP07 system. Whenever I remove a characteristic from an InfoProvider, assignments of other characteristics (especially routines) are deleted. Normallay, I expect only to see the transformation inactive without changing any other assignments.
I couldn't find any OSS notes related to this case.
Does anyone have any idea or experienced the same before?
Thanks!

Where your facing this issue?
at dev system?
Try to do delete info object form your target by using remodeling option and see it.
Below option is the last option.
if your target not yet been moved to production then you can try to create new cube with required info object.do the transformations and activation.

Similar Messages

  • Learned controller assignments often get stuck in Logic.... (?)

    Hey guys, when use hardware controllers for controlling parameters of softsynths in Logic, I find that the software knobs often get stuck while moving them. I can not see a pattern to this behaviour, but it happens if I learn assignments within Logic, or using my Novation remote SL and other controllers with templates.
    Is this a known issue. Anyone else getting it?
    thanks,
    Rob

    Yeah the whole controller assignment thing has me
    baffled. It seems to be geared towards specific,
    permanently installed "control surfaces".
    Not really - you can completely create your own multi-layer control surfaces, it's just that doing a complete control surface, with bank shifts for controlling track groups and so on is a fair amount of work, and takes some getting to know the controller assignments window, and the terminology like "modes" and "zones" etc
    However, the level of control it gives you is great, and if you want examples, you can for instance load a Logic Control controller surface into Logic and examine the way all it's assignments are configured.
    If you want to be more sure you can set up a
    transformer object to map midi cc's to your synths.
    I find it's way better (for me at least) to develop my own control surface support. I use a Korg MicroKontrol and found the default controller support to be rather clunky and not ideal for me, so I've developed and been refining my own control surface support which suits my needs perfectly. It's takes time and is an ongoing process, but is highly useful.
    I just wish some of the flaky behaviour was fixed, but my fingers are crossed for future versions...
    In any case, if you want to map a fader to a softsynth parameter, just hit apple-L, click on the onscreen control, and twiddle you fader. Assignment learnt. Do this for the parameters you want, turn off learn mode, and twiddle away with perfect automation.
    Don't also forget the automation quick access as well - assign your mod wheel to this, and you can select any parameter of a plug and quickly use the mod wheel to control it or write automation etc.

  • Transformation inactive after system copy in SCM system

    Hi Team,
    I am posting this in BW keeping in mind that i am receiving issues in RSA1 transaction in my SCM system after the recent system copy. We did the system copy of SCM system and DTP conversion was also done using program RSBKDTP_BDLS. No errors occurred while the program ran. Now we have handed the system back to users for checking and they have reported an error saying there were some transformations missing in the system while checking the DTP . I went to RSA1 transaction in my SCM system and searched for the DTP and status seems to be in inactive status. I then clicked on change button and an error message mentioning the below appears.
    Transformation XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX inactive; action cannot be executed
    Message no. RSBK260
    Diagnosis
    A transformation (XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) used by the DTP is inactive.
    System Response
    The action (request processing or DTP maintenance) was terminated.
    Procedure
    Activate the transformation. It connects the source XXXXXXXX   XXXCLNT100 to the target XXXXXXXX.
    I checked for the transformation entry in the table RSTRAN and did not find the same. Also i ran the program RSDG_TRFN_ACTIVATE to activate the transformation but nothing happens.
    Have anyone came across this type of issue. I need some advise on the same and guide me in case if i am missing something, since i have not worked on this type of issue before.
    Thanks for your help in advance.
    Rajesh

    Hi,
    Due to the system copy we always get this issues.
    Just ask your basis team to check source system assignments. they can do it.its their activity.
    at BW Server, RSA1 -->menu tools--> manage source system, check the source system. same need to have at below we20.
    at Tx - WE20, Partner type Ls---> under this you may see your target(SCM) and source system anmes. select source name and rigth side panel partner status need be active A.
    At quality syste, activations thru program may not be happen. better to re-transport the dtp from dev system.
    Thanks

  • Internal error while transforming bpmn to bpel

    Hi,
    i designed a simple bpmn model and i’ve got an error while transforming the model into a bpel process.
    Steps i’ve done:
    1.     SOA > Transform business process into bpel process
    2.     the following semantic check was ok and there were no errors listed
    3.     I selected the check box “create log file”
    4.     Then an error occurs: “Unable to perform transformation. Internal error: There are semantic errors in this model. The errors have been displayed on the model”
    5.     After clicking OK, the log file appears: -- WARNINGS --: W#17 : Warning: in the current model, some functions are not connected to services.”
    6.     in the bpmn model there are two objects marked with a red line: an automated activity and a XOR gateway (data-based).
    I don’t know what’s wrong with these objects. I checked the properties of the automated activity, but “Abstract BPEL activity” is selected and so I don’t understand what the problem is.
    Are there dependencies, I don’t see? The assignments of both objects are correct. Are there other requirements i have to consider?
    Previous to the automated activity there’s another XOR gateway (data-based) with three branches (one of them is the obviously incorrect activity) and all three branches meet in the red marked XOR gateway.
    Any idea?
    Regards
    Julika

    Hi Julika,
    The error message might not be related to the activities itself. I assume your model is not well structured. Consider that the following points aren't disregarded:
    * Never "jump" out of a particular branch into a different part of the model or into another branch
    * All functions/events have only one incoming/outgoing connection
    * Process parallel flows should be specified by splitting and joining AND/XOR rules, or they should contain either one splitting AND/XOR rule only for which there is no other connection between their paths, or one joining AND/XOR rule only that is met by all connections.
    Let me know if it did not help to fix your problem.
    Best regards,
    Danilo

  • Problem in activating Transformation

    Hi All,
    I have a calmonth field coming from the source system with with sinlge digit value. I am using the info object 0calmonth2 in BI. So I have created a small formula in the transformation to prefix the value from source system with a zero. A zero padding needs to be done for the months 1 -9, before loading to BI.
    During activating the transformation, it throws a dump.
    The formula I used was
    IF( STR_LEN( CALMONTH2 ) = 1, CONCATENATE( 0, CALMONTH2 ), CALMONTH2 ) where calmonth2 is the value coming from the source system.
    The dump I got while activating the transformation :
    Runtime Errors         OBJECTS_OBJREF_NOT_ASSIGNED
    Except.                CX_SY_REF_IS_INITIAL
    Could anyone help me with resolving the isue.
    Possible solutions expected :
    1)SAP Note to fix the dump
    2)ABAP Routine to handle the above formula(I dont know ABAP)
    Regards,
    Arun

    The ABAP routine should be something like this:
    if <month> ne 10 or <month> ne 11 or <month> ne 12
    concatenate '0' <month> into result.
    else.
    result = <month>
    endif.
    However, I'm not sure this will fix your problem.
    Can you check if you have no incorrect assignments?
    If no, I think OSS will help.
    Which Support package are you on?

  • Type conflict error - in Transformations

    Hi all,
    I have done Transformation euregine of Transfer/Update rules for 0FI_AA_006 DS/IS I have activated and loaded till PSA.When  Iexecuting my DTP it is showing an dump stating that " Dump: ABAP/4 processor: ASSIGN_TYPE_CONFLICT " .
    I have seen all assignments of my transformations ,all are correct( default given by SAP ),why I am getting that error did any one faced that error. ihave faced that problem previously also for other data source in FI.Shall  Ihave to install any notes for that ?
    Regards
      KK

    We also encountered this error please follow the below mentioned step.Hopefully U'll b able to make it up
    If the error occurs in a note you implemented or in Support Package 06 or higher, you must follow the manual troubleshooting steps<AS Char>described below.
               Import Support Package 06 for SAP NetWeaver 2004s BI (BI Patch 07 or SAPKW70006) into your BI system. The Support Package is available when Note 0872278 "SAPBINews BI 7.0 Support Package 06", which describes t his Support Package in more detail, is released for customers.
    In urgent cases, you can use the correction instructions.
    You must then proceed as follows:
    Manual steps for troubleshooting:
    The transformation(s) involved must be newly activated or you must reset the generation status:
    Carry out the following steps to reset the status:
    Call Transaction 'RSSGPCLA'
    Place the cursor on the 'RSTRAN_MASTER_TMPL' program class.
    Choose the 'Set status' pushbutton (CTRL+F3)

  • Duplicating the existing sourcesystem assignments to a new source-system

    Hi all
    We have another new sourcesystem (logical system) in our BI system.
    This is a copy of the productive erp-sytsem, upgraded to EHP4.
    Now we want to test the connectivities and data load procedures.
    Is there a possibility to "copy" all the existing datasources/transformations of an existing system
    to this new system without using transports?
    We already tried using report 'RBDLSMAP' but it seems to overwrite the existing assignments.
    Any idea??
    Thanks
    Thomas

    Hello Thomas,
    You have to use a transport , to transport the source system dependent objects normally the following procedure is used:
    RSA1
    Transport Connection
    Button 'Collection mode'  set to 'start manual collection'
    Press 'Source system assignment' button (it's the one left of the
    'Request BEx' button)
    Select the source systems you want to save the transfer rules for
    Continue
    Button 'Grouping' set to 'Save for system copy'
    At the left border click on 'Object Types'
    Extend tree  'Source system' LSYS
    Double click on 'Select objects'
    Select the source systems you want to collect objects for
    the source system is now displayed in the right box
    Press collecting button ('gather dependent objects')
    this may take a while
    Right click on the root of the tree and select
    Transport all below
    Expand the whole tree and check if there isn't an object which is locked
    by an other open transport request !!
    (the column 'Transport request' has to be empty (BEFORE deleting the corresponding source system
    connection!)
    Kind Regards,
    Des

  • Data Manager: Transformations( Matching Mode)

    Hi All,
    In Matching mode of data manager, I set some transformation. In preview field of transformation tab, data is changing as per in substitution.
    But after merging it is not reflecting into the data( what I set in substitution, is not reflecting into the data).
    What I have to do for this? Any other settings?
    Please help....
    Regards,
    Nikhil

    Hi Nikhil ,
    You could use assignments in this case and build it accordingly :
    in the DM ->assignments tab -> add an  assignment -> give a it a name -> and in the assignment field tab click the ... that appears , this opens the assignemtn builder now use the functions provide and create this assignment
    IF(IS_NOT_NULL(field name where INDIA is to be placed ),INDIA)
    close the expression builder & in the table field row maintain the field name where you want the INDIA value to be placed.
    In the record mode choose a record where this is to be replaced right click ,run the assignment -you get a success or failure message ,now if this is what you require then select all the records where you want this update & proceed.
    Please let us know if your issue is solved , reward points too if so !
    Regards,
    Anita

  • Environment Transformer - Randomize Pitch ::: Bug or Feature (Article)

    Hello,
    There are quite many discussions lately about the Logic Environment Transformer "Randomize Note Pitch" operation. By default it does not work as expected passing thru the original Note events data. That's why many Logic users think that it is a bug. Unfortunately this FAQ has never been answered correctly in all Logic forums, PRO training books/workshops, articles etc. As a result, many Logic users contacted the Audiogrocery (which is specialized into Logic Environment & MIDI FX developments). Here is a step by step explanation:
    Bug or Feature?
    It is a Logic self-protection feature! The Environment Transformer object is a complex scripting tool which consists of heavy codes created by the genius Emagic developers more than 15 years ago. There are hundreds of combo settings you can use but a few ones are Protected! The Note Pitch Randomization is one of them - why?
    (Fig.1)
    The example  (Fig.1) shows a triggering note D2 which passes thru the Transformer Pitch Randomizer (Pitch Condition) without any result. The programing reason which blocks that is [B]Note Hanging[/B]!
    Bear in mind that this Transformer setting randomizes ([B]in force Mode - see below[/B]) the Note ONs and the OFFs in a different way causing hanging notes. The factory Script: Note receiving (Condition) & Pitch Random (Scale Operation Assignments) is designed to block such Combo setting because it requires perfect Note ON randomizing registrations followed by proper Note OFFs - see the last Macro tool shown in this article below.
    Force Mode - Note to P-Press (Example)
    Let's force that limitation (Fig.2). In this test you can set the Operation "Status" to Control Change, Fader, P-press etc . In my scenario I have set the Operation Condition to "P-press" status, keeping the original Pitch Random Range "C3- G3".
    [B]Note[/B]: The Transformer is forced and works as expected now! However the Monitor object shows P-Press (ON event F3) and (OFF event E3) which do not match each other and will cause Note hanging for sure - see below!
    (Fig.2)
    Force Mode - Note to P-Press & P-press to Note
    Let's patch/cable one more Transformer object which will transform back the forced "P-press" randomization into Note events (Fig.3).
    (Fig.3)
    This image shows clearly that the source triggered Note (D2) is randomized into D#3 Note ON (according to the 1st Transformer "Rand" setting) while the Note OFF is randomized to E3 which does not match the Note ON! This Environment "Forcing" scheme will cause "Note Hanging"!
    Solution
    The main purpose of this article is to show that this "issue" is a Logic self-protection feature! However there is a forcing method alternative which can put that into work. As I mentioned before you can patch/cable a few Transformers to register the Note ONs event numbers during the randomization and use that register scheme to send proper Note OFFs numbers to the Instrument. Such complex Environment setup takes no more than 5-6 Transformers which can be packed into a Macro (Fig4).
    (Fig.4)
    As you see the Note Pitch Randomizer example Macro shown in Fig.4 sends proper Note OFFs Numbers to the Instrument device.
    A.G

    Hi Mark,
    According to your description, my understanding is that the Article Date column displayed with the value based on GMT0 in the Refinement web part.
    Microsoft SharePoint stores date and time values in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, but also named GMT or Zulu) format, and almost all date and time values that are returned by members of the object model are in UTC format. So the value
    of the Article Date column stores the date and time in UTC format in the database, and the search indexes the UTC value of the Article Date column after crawling the database so that it displays the UTC value in Refinement web part.
    The list column values displayed in the lists that are obtained through the indexer for the SPListItem class are already formatted in the local time for the site so if you’re working on current context list item and fetch a datetime field
    like so SPContext.Current.ListItem["Your-DateTime-Field"] you’ll retrieve a DateTime object according the specified time zone in the regional settings.
    More references:
    http://francoisverbeeck.wordpress.com/2012/05/24/sharepoint-tip-of-the-day-be-careful-when-wor/
    Thanks,
    Victoria
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Victoria Xia
    TechNet Community Support

  • Logic keeps losing controller assignments???

    I have an Axiom 49 with it's transport buttons assigned to various logic functions. I have assigned these in the key command section by "learn new assignment" Every so often these commands stop working altogether as if Logic "forgets" them. When I look at the learned command line it still shows the assignment but it isn't until I "relearn" the exact same assignment that it works again. This is extremely frustrating. Does anyone know why this happens and if there is a workaround? Thanks.

    don'tforgetyourtowel wrote:
    This may work for your controller assignment issues. I haven't tried that specifically but it definitely works for solving problems with midi ports changing depending on what you have hooked up when you boot Logic.
    The CA (Controller Assignments) are "Pre", regarding the Logic Physical Input in Click & Ports layer, so this will not solve the "Input Floating Ports" problem I guess... I think a little tip using IAC bus can work cause once IAC is activated it is a MAC constant virtual port.
    *The IAC Tip*
    1. Cut the "Sum" cable from the Physical Input and cable the IAC (Bus1) port to the Monitor object (1) - see the pic below. You can name the Monitor (IAC Bus1 IN) etc.
    2. Cable all physical ports to the "Sum Physical Ports" Monitor object (2).
    3. Create an Instrument object (3), assign its port to IAC, set its midi channel to "All" and cable from "Sum Physical Ports" Monitor object (2).
    4. Create a new Fader in the Environment and cable it to the IAC Instrument as shown (4).
    5. Move the fader of your external controller you plan to learn to see what is its CC# and channel# in the "Sum Physical Ports" Monitor. (You can skip this step if you are familiar with the physical fader/knob hardware CC assignment previously).
    6. Select the virtual fader (4) labeled as "Temp Learn" in the environment and set its output CC definition number and midi channel to match your external controller you plan to learn in the inspector.
    7. Save your new midi setup as a Logic template song.
    8. Press (Command+K) to open the Logic CA expert dialog. Do the standard "learn" procedure to learn any channel strip or plugin parameter but instead of moving the external controller fader/knob you must move the virtual environment fader labeled as "Temp Learn" (4). This way Logic CA will be learned from the IAC bus (you will see that in the CA expert dialog). After this "Dummy" learn process you can tweak the physical controller - done!
    The method must solve the "Input Floating Ports" problem cause all CA assignments will be learned from the IAC port which is constant (non-floating until you may decide to switch it OFF in the Mac AMS).
    The other good side is if you decide to move your Logic Preference file ( i.e CA) to another machine - all assignments must work this way ( I did not try yet but in theory it must work ).
    Another advantage is that you can patch lots of interesting "Transformer Gears" between the "Sum Physical Ports" Monitor (2) and the Instrument IAC port (3). In other words you can use the Logic Environment as an advanced "MIDI JUNCTION" engine serving its midi processing to other apps, CA etc...
    !http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/5460/iacca.gif!
    !http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/4967/aglogo45.gif!

  • Transformation GUI

    Hi,
    We are checking the upgrade system of BI 7.0 and it seems ruther inconvinient to work with the transformation.
    All this mapping with lines between source and target cause a few problems when you have a lot of objects:
    1. Eventually it looks like a spagetti and very hard to track the connections (especially when the source and target are not in the same "page")
    2. In BW 3.5, when we had a similar transfer rules, we used Ctrl+Y, copy and paste, so it was much faster. what can we use in transformation mapping ?
    3. Not always the system proposal is right. It's hard to check which objects should be replaced.
    Does anyone know if there's a way to change the GUI and have it a little more like the old one ?
    Or maybe there's something that could ease owr work ?
    I really hope there's something that could help us, because otherwise it's a nightmare and we might not upgrade after all...
    Kind Regards,
    Daphna Shani

    Daphna,
      When working with transformations, you are correct.
      The system proposal doesn't work right & is tedious.
       This is what I suggest (Connecting Cube<->Data source)
       1. Replicate the data source in 3.x version.
       2. Create the transfer rules & map it to Info source.
       3. Create update rules & amp cube to Info src.
        (Same as you did previously)
        4. Now create Transformation from cube directly to data 
            source.
       At this point SAP will propose most of the rules & they will be correct. (N.B:Automatic time conversion & Unit/currency assignments will not happen. You have to do it manually.)
       5. Now migrate the data source to 7.0.
       6. Delete the update rules (cube<->info src).
        Works for me.
    Thanks Vishno.

  • Not all fields are getting updated in transformation

    Dear all,
    Please help me in the following issue:
    I have the following scenario:
    DSO1 and CUBE1. From DSO1 to CUBE1 I have transformation. Fields are mapped one to one.
    Some of the fields are getting updated in transformation (22 fields) and some of them are not updated in transformation. (2 - storage location and steel grade).
    The fields exist in DSO 1 but don't go into cube.
    I did the following:
    1. deleted transformation and dtp, recreate = > not working
    2. copied the cube, and create new transformation and DTP...not working.
    Any help would be appreciated
    Thank you
    Ramona

    Hi Ramona,
    Storage location (standard infoobject 0STOR_LOC) has plant as compunding object, check whether this is the issue ? (may be check with Steel grade infoobject also).
    Else, do some RSRV checks on the DSO and Infoobject, if it doesn't bring up any issue, raise a message with SAP.
    Check your BW Support Pack level , is it the latest ? Give more details about the scenario ?
    Cheers,
    CK

  • Transformation Issue: HR - PA

    Hi,
    I'm working on SAP HR-PA stuff.
    In standard data flow,  0HR_PA_0 & 0HR_PA_1 datasources feeding data to 0PA_C01 Cube.
    Our detailed reporting requirements demands me to insert a DSO in between. I created a DSO with same fields as cube, and copied all the routines in the update rules and loaded data and everything is working fine.
    Now, I wanted to use BI 7.0 functionality, So, i selected update rules -> Additional functions -> Create Transformation. .
    This will convert all 3.5 routines into BI 7.0 routines, I guess.
    But, after the data loads, surprisingly these transformation populating wrong data into DSO.
    Is this the right way to create transformation from update rules?
    Thanks,
    V

    Hi Vas,
    I just read your thread on sdn for 0PA_C01 cube.
    I need a small help from you.
    I am also working on the same cube, same like you I am migraitng the data flow from 3.5 to 7.0. I have few routines in the update rules which i need to convert it to oops abap in bi7. You have this cube in 7.0 already. So, can you please send me the routine code you have. Actually i am not a abaper and my client also dont have any bw-abap person. I need to do some manual changes in the code. My data flow is exactly same as your data flow. I am unable to solve this problem from long time.
    And also I need to put dso inbetween the flow as per our clients requirements. So where did yu out the start routines and infoobject routines in update rules of 3.5 to 7.0, i mean at what stage?, before dso or after dso? Also I have the INCLUDE in my routines that I am worried about.
    If you provide me the code, i will really appreciate it. And in future we can share the knowledge as well.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Harshal Panchal

  • Transformation - Fields Missing!!

    Hello Experts,
    I am facing a strange issue in the transformation beteen DSO to Cube.
    My DSO Contains 148 fields while in the transformation I can see only 131 fields.
    IN thedevelopment Box the transformation appears fine but in the Acceptace box the mentioned problem
    occurs.I tried regenerating the export datasource, activated & transported the DSO but all in vain.
    PLease help.
    Thanks,
    Suyog

    Hi,
    Go to RSA1--> Data sources Choose source system as BI and find for data source with 8<DSO name>. Once you get the data source ,select change from context menu --> go to Fields tab and check under column Transfer (5th Column) for all fields . If any field is unchecked then check and activate data source to see all fields in Cube transformations.
    hope it helps...
    regards,
    Raju

  • Regarding Field Missing in Dso Transformation

    Hi
    Folks
    I am facing the issue like
    In Datasouce to DSO transformation i can see the 55 objects in DSO table, and in DSO to Cube Transformation i can see 54 fields in DSO table, one field is missing , the object  0TXTSH(short discription) is mapped to field 0TXZ01in DS to DSO transformation.
    so How can i get the field in DSO to Cube transformation.??
    any settings have to be change???
    waiting for yours Valuable answers
    Regards
    Anand

    Hi,
    Please identify the object and check it whether it is an attribute or a characteristic, if it is attribute only disable that option then check it.
    Regards,
    Srinivas

Maybe you are looking for