Async-Sync-Async Bridge Without BPM

HI Folks,
I have a requirement as
u201CAn Asynchronous SOAP request is triggered to PI and then should get records from a (JDBC)database and write the result to a fileu201D
It is of Aync-Sync-Async Bridge and i have to do without BPM
I know by using some module parameters at sender communication channel we can do this.
But my query
1)Is that for SOAP sender communication channel can we provide the same module parameters
Number - ModuleName - Type - ModuleKey
1- AF_Modules/RequestResponseBean - Local Enterprise Bean - 1
2- CallSapAdapter-Local Enterprise Bean - 2
3-AF_Modules/ResponseOnewayBean-3
Parameters
ModuleKey - ParameterName - ParameterValue
1 - passThrough - true
3-receiverChannel - Receiver File Adapter Name
3-receiverService - Receiver Business Service/ System
2) Does the SOAP support the without BPM scenarios
3)Scenario is like Soap --> JDBC -->File (Async - Sync - Async) and how abt for Soap --> RFC -->File (Async - Sync - Async)
Thanks in Advance
Lemon

For your requirement , you can handle this scenario without BPM in two ways.
1) Async sync bridge without BPM. You are going to use request response bean and one way response bean module to achieve this. very simple. See this [link|http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/File-RFC-File(Without%20BPM)]
In the sender SOAP channel you have to configure first request response bean, second callsapadapter and third onewayresponse bean. Refer this link. Simply follow file sender configuration for your soap sender or RFC sender.
Note: one receiver agreement , one receiver determination, one interface determination. only two receiver channels one jdbc and one file.
2) You can create SOAP to File asynchronous. Using quality of service EO and creating service interface asynchronous mode. In the mapping area do JDBC lookup. If your version is 7.1 then this lookup is available. This is pretty simple no need to do async to sync pattern.
Hope that helps.

Similar Messages

Async-Sync Bridge without BPM for SOAP WS and JDBC

I heard you can now have async-sync communication outside of BPM by utilizing adapter modules?
My scenarios are:
proxy (async) -> SOAP WS (sync)
proxy (async) -> JDBC (sync)
I will like to capture the synchronous responses in XI and perform some basic error handling.
I read h[File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.|File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.] and the release notes for 2004s SP19 and there is no reference to JDBC or SOAP.
tia

Hi Megha,
Plz do refer the below links u will get an idea:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a05b2347-01e7-2910-ceac-c45577e574e0
Sync/Async communication in Adapter without BPM (SP19)
Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM (SP19)
Async/Sync Communication using JMS adapter without BPM (SP 19)
Async/Sync Communication using JMS adapter without BPM (SP 19)
also try this
Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM (SP19)
File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.
Collecting IDocs without using BPM
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5059f110-0d01-0010-7c8b-fdc983be70c0
Have a look
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5059f110-0d01-0010-7c8b-fdc983be70c0
HTTP to RFC - A Starter Kit
Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM (SP19)
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
Do refer this thread:
JDBC Async-Sync bridge does not work
Reward if found useful
Regards,
Vinod.

Async Sync Bridge without BPM (Proxy-Soap-Idoc)

Hi,
I have read some blogs how to do the Async Sync Bridge without BPM for JMS adapters. I have a requirement that I am getting a Async Proxy message to PI and then PI makes Sync Soap call then the result need to send through the Idoc adapter.
Proxy - Soap- Idoc
Here Proxy is a sender so no adapter required in the Config and also Soap is java based adapter and Idoc adapter is a ABAP based so I am not sure this is possible but I just wanted to check with you.
Please let know if this is possible or not?
PI 7.1 with EHP1
Thanks,
Laxman
Edited by: Laxman Molugu on Oct 14, 2010 2:15 PM

The mapping programm can be defined as a user defined function. As sample of mine is "getGoogle()", which is doing some kind of address validation. The input parameter URL[0] contains source address. For that you need to import:
org.apache.commons.logging.*;
org.w3c.dom.*;
javax.xml.parsers.*;
org.xml.sax.SAXException;
org.apache.commons.httpclient.*;
org.apache.commons.httpclient.methods.*;
org.apache.commons.codec.*;
org.apache.log4j.*;
Example code for UDF "getGoogle()" is:
String sUrl = "http://maps.google.de/maps/api/geocode/xml?address=" + URL[0] + "&sensor=false";
HttpClient client = new HttpClient();
GetMethod method = new GetMethod(sUrl);
byte[] responseBody = null;
    try {
//      int statusCode = client.executeMethod(method);
//      byte[] responseBody = method.getResponseBody();
//     result.addValue(new String(responseBody));
String sResponse = "initial";
int statusCode = client.executeMethod(method);
responseBody = method.getResponseBody();
ByteArrayInputStream bis = new ByteArrayInputStream(responseBody);
DocumentBuilderFactory factory = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance();
DocumentBuilder db = factory.newDocumentBuilder();
Document doc = db.parse(bis);
doc.getDocumentElement().normalize();
NodeList nodeLst = doc.getElementsByTagName("formatted_address");
Node formAdr = nodeLst.item(0);
NodeList nlFormAdr = formAdr.getChildNodes();
sResponse = ((Node) nlFormAdr.item(0)).getNodeValue();
      // Deal with the response.
    result.addValue(sResponse);
    } catch (Exception e) {
      result.addValue(e.toString() + "######## exhrenda - googleResponse:############### URL=" + sUrl+"###########"+new String(responseBody));
    } finally {
      // Release the connection.
      method.releaseConnection();

Doubt on Aync-Sync Bridge without BPM

I created a scenario using Aync-Sync Bridge without BPM:
File(Asyn) => Rfc:BAPI_PO_CREATE1(Syn)
1 which mode of message interface should be used in IR for File(Asyn)?
Asyn or Syn?
2 if syn MSG interface should be used in the above question,how can i return BAPI_PO_CREATE1.response which includes PO number to the sender?
BTW:I had maintained the modules and their parameters(AF_Modules/RequestResponseBean and AF_Modules/ResponseOnewayBean)
in RFC CC.
Regards
Ming

Hi,
1) You have to use synchronous interface.
2) There will two message mappings(one request and one response) and one interface mapping between synchronous interface.
3) All the corresponding modules should ve added in File sender communication channel not in RFC CC.
Regards,
Sudheer
Message was edited by:
Sudheer

Sync / Async Bridge without BPM

Hi All,
I was trying to implement the Sync / Async Bridge without the BPM. I am trying a HTTP to JMS Sync / Async Bridge. I have followed the following link and done exactly the same as shown in the document
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/EN/45/20d2b4c20a0732e10000000a155369/content.htm
I have used a Java application which will poll the request queue and then place the message in the response queue with the same correlation ID frm the request queue.
After following the above link the response message was not appearing, the message were going to deilvering status and after some time i found that they were cancelled without errors
I searched in the forums for many solutions but what i found was this thread which stated that since the XI message ID is 32 bytes and Correlation ID is only 24 bytes its difficult for Modules to identify the response since the correlation is truncated.
JMS: Synch/Async bridge - how to configure
I tried changing the configuration in the reciver JMS channel to XI Conversion ID instead of Message ID and this also doesnt give me fruitfull results. The message was not being placed in the request queue, it gave an error saying that the conversion id was null. Though in the thread it seems to have worked for him.
After this i planned to dynamically generate a Correlation ID (a dummy one) of 24bytes and i sent it to the request queue this time the message was retrived from the response queue only to find that the correlation ID this time has been converted to some other format
Corrletion ID sent to the request queue: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWX
Corrlation ID coming in the response queue : 4142434445464748494a4b4c4d4e4f505152535455565758
Can anyone put some light on what i exactly need to do or tell me why the conversion ID worked for Daneil in the thread and it gave me an error saying that the Conversion id is null
Rgds
Aditya

Hi Prateek,
This is what was tried in my first case. I did exactly what was given in that link.But since the Message id being 32 bytes and length of correlation id is 24 bytes id is getting truncated.
So its not working fine.
@ke i am having a look at the note will update you on this
Thanks for your response
Rgds
Aditya

Correlation issue in JMS adapter - SYNC/ASYNC scenario without BPM

Hi,
I am working on a SYNC/ASYNC scenario with JMS adapter without using BPM. My scenario is SOAP<>PI>JMS. I configured the interface as below:
1. SOAP Sender channel
2. JMS Receiver Channel writing to Queue A.
     Module used:      a. RequestOneWayBean
               b. WaitResponseBean
     Correlation Settings:
               a. Set JMS Correlation ID to "XI Message ID"
               b. Store JMS CorrelationID of request (Checked)
               c. Set JMS Property to "JMS Correlation Id"
               d. Value = "XI MEssage ID"
3. JMS Sender channel reading from queue B ( I am exporting the message from queue A and importing into queue B)
     Module used:      a. NotifyResponseBean
     Correlation Settings:
               a. Set XI MEssage Id to "GUID"
               b. Set XI Conversation ID to "Stored JMS COrrelationID of Request"
I can see the cid in the message from queue A. But I observed thhat the header format of the message in Queue A is "MQSTR".
ISSUE:
1. While writing the message to queue A, below adapter log details(part b) concerned me:
     a. Message '8747a7c2-2b06-11df-8055-005056a70ed6' successfully processed by channel
     b. Could not create acknowledgements for message '8747a7c2-2b06-11df-8055-005056a70ed6'
I am not sure why I am receiving the message that " could not create acknowledgements"
2. While reading the message from the sender channel,I consistently get the error message as below:
     a. XI message ID corresponding to JMS message with ID 'ID:414d51205341504449442e514d202020c67b954b20005602'
          will be created as a new GUID with value '21bca916-424f-41f6-3347-c71090392b58'
     b. Error while processing message '21bca916-424f-41f6-3347-c71090392b58'; detailed error description:
          com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.api.channel.filter.MessageFilterException: found no correlation ID: RecoverableException:
          found no correlation ID at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.SendToModuleProcessorFilter.filter(SendToModuleProcessorFilter.java:105) ...
Below are the blogs which I have already gone through:
1. JMS Synchronous Scenario without BPM - Correlation Settings and Transactional JMS Session
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/b028f6f6-7da5-2a10-19bd-cf322cf5ae7b
2. Note: 1086303
3. Sync / Async Bridge without BPM
In the note, they mentioned something about header being "MQRFH2". BUt in our case, the header is "MSSTR". Not sure whether it makes any difference.
Please help.
Edited by: GP on Mar 9, 2010 4:24 AM

Hi,
detailed error description:
com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.api.channel.filter.MessageFilterException: found no correlation ID: RecoverableException:
found no correlation ID at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.SendToModuleProcessorFilter.filter(SendToModuleProcessorFilter.java:105) ...
This error would generally arose when there are multiple messages, got stuck in the outbound queue. Try to stop both the sender and receiver JMS comunication channels and clear both the inbound and outbound queues.
Once all the messages in the queue are cleraed, try posting the message again.
Regards,
Swetha.

Async/ Sync without BPM where Async channels are different.

Hi Guys,
I've created a couple of async/ sync bridges without BPM for File to Web Service to File and for JMS to Web Service to JMS.
Is it possible to use two different types of asynchronous communication channels when creating an async/ sync bridge? I've tried to create a File to Web Service to JMS queue, but it fails with the following error appearing on the File communication channel.
Error: com.sap.aii.af.service.cpa.impl.exception.CPAObjectKeyException: Value of key must not be null: ObjectId
All the best,
John

Hi John,
Actually the fact that you get this error in the sender file CC makes me think is it purely related to the communication channel configuration. Try to make sure if your scenario works without the additional RequestResponseBean in the receiver (so as a simple Async scenario). When you have that one working, try to add the RequestResponseBean.
Hope this helps,
Greg

Sync/Async brdige error in BPM

Hi,
I am working on RFC-TO-Webservice scenario(Synchronous) and I am using the BPM in this scenario.
In BPM just I have used 2 steps.
Receive - Opened Sync/Async bridge
Send - Synchrouns step
Send - Cloase the Receive step
Send - Asynchrous send step (to send the response to the file...).
When I sent my RFC message from R/3 I am getting following error.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="INTERNAL">PL_TIMEOUT</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Timeout condition of pipeline reached</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
I am using PI 7.0 SP13 is why I am not able to receive the Sync message in BPM...I have created the abstract interface based on RFC...getting the first message itself Timeout error.
I am trying to use Sync/Asnc bridge in BPM. First message itself PL_TIMEOUT error..bpm is not able to receive my rfc request...
I need help on this...do I need to do any settings in WEBAS level..I did Timeout setting in SXMB_ADM.
Regards,
Venu.

hi,
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
check this blog..and same thing I did in my scenario
my scenario is RFC-TO-Webservice.
Sync/Async bridge can't we use like this ...Receiver step(open sync/async)-> Send(Synchronous)-Send(Close sync bridge)....that way can't we use ...
I am not able to receive the RFC request itself inside my BPM first step...getting the Timeout error.
But when I use the RECEIVE STEP with Asynchronous mode..I am able to receive the message inside my bpm.Incase of Synchronous I am not able to receive the message..
I am working PI 7.0 and SP13..did any body worked this version...
Thanks,
venu.

Async to sync to async across different SWCV using BPM

I have inherited some scenarios and incomplete config... the more i dig the more i find....
i think I have a SAP proxy -> web (sync) -> mail adapter scenario.
i have created the SWCV for the web, the Proxy is using SAP Standard ERECRUIT objects (aysnc) and i guess i need to use a BPM to link the async -> sync -> async.
however, i cannot use the object from the ERECRUIT object in my BPM... :o( i have tried... it is not allowing me...
the service interface is not abstract... i cannot create an abstract version of the SI in my namespace and use it... as it can only access the DT and External Definitions within the SWCV...
would it be best to map the SAP structure to a custom copy of the SAP Structure within my namespace then proceed with the BPM?
what would be best practice for this??? has anyone else come across a similar scenario? is BPM the answer???
i have been looking at this blog and it looks the way to go...
/people/sriram.vasudevan3/blog/2005/01/11/demonstrating-use-of-synchronous-asynchronous-bridge-to-integrate-synchronous-and-asynchronous-systems-using-ccbpm-in-sap-xi
i am using rules to determine where the message should be routed too in the receiver, but i get the feeling this will have be implemented for all messages once i get the first working... the process will probably be the same, jsut the final Web destination will be different....

for the BPM, you can only access service interface in the same SWCV as of the BPM.

Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM

Hi,
as of SP19 XI's JMS adapter offers this new feature for Sync/Async communication through JMS Adapter modules instead of using a BPE.
Now I would be interested to know if anybody has already successfully used this feature especially using WebSphere MQ as a JMS Provider (preferredly in the mode JMS Compliant: WebSphere MQ (non-JMS)).
I experienced some issues with the XI Message ID being used as the JMS Correlation ID which is then mapped to the MQ Correlation ID being truncated after 24 characters. So I don't exactly know whether this is due to wrong setup or some general issues with this messaging system.
Please let me know if you have any experiences at all with this new feature (please do not just post links to the following blogs, which I have thoroughly studied as well as the How-to Guide concerning this topic)
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2007/01/18/syncasync-communication-in-jms-adapter-without-bpm-sp19
/people/sudheer.babu2/blog/2007/01/18/asyncsync-communication-using-jms-adapter-without-bpm-sp-19
thanks & regards,
Peter

Hi Peter,
we working on the same Problem. Using IBM Websphere MQ as JMS Provider for the new feature: sync/async bridge without BPE.
we switched on a high level trace for the adapter framework and saw a problem in the receiving Object of the JMS correlation id. The notify bean receives the JMS correlationid in hex format. so the beans have two different correlations, which could not find together.
did you have any solution to get this new feature works with IBM Websphere ?
thanks
joachim

Is there Async-Sync bridge in BPM

Hi ,
I am trying this scenario in ccBPM(PI7.10
JMS(Async)>MDM(Sync)>SAP(Sync)
The reason I cant use it without BPM is that message in JMS is needed in SAP step.I am not sure of messages can be persisted without a ccBPM.
When I give receive step as Async,in next send (Sync call) ,I cant see any Syn Abstract interfaces even though i have declared one.Only Asyn abstract interfaces appear to chose container element as abstract type.
In what way can I specify Aysn-Sync bridge in ccBPM ?
Regards,
Premjit

the async / sync scenarios can be configured via two options;
ref these
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
Without BPM
File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.

Need help with scenario BPM Http-RFC Sync/async bridge

hi all!
i've got the following scenario: HTTP-BPM(XI)-RFC synchronous both of them. for that, i'm using S/A bridge in the BPM, but i'm getting the error 'Timeout condition of pipeline reached'. i think the problem is that the process gets lost in the sync/async communication, because in the trace level shows CL_XMS_PLSRV_CALL_BPE-ENTER_PLSRV" and after that every message are 'wait time starting'.
don't know the reason of the error. Maybe I missed something to configure?
the BPM is like this:
Receiver(Open Sync/Async bridge) -> Transformation (mapping from http request to RFC request) -> SyncSend (RFC request and response) -> Transformation (mapping from rfc response to http response) -> Send (Close S/A Bridge)
the IR is configured like this:
Message Types u2013 External Definitions u2013 Imported Objects
mt_cxml_request -> contains xsd of xcml request template.
mt_cxml_response -> contains xsd of xcml response template.
zintegracion_pedidos -> imported RFC from R/3
zintegracion_pedidos.response -> imported RFC from R/3
Message Interfaces
mi_cxml_request_async_abs
mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
mi_cxml_request_sync_out
mi_xcml_response_async
mi_rfc_request_asyn_abs
mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
mi_rfc_request_sync_in
mi_rfc_response_async_abs
Message Mappings
mm_cxml_request_to_rfc_request -> mapping from http request (cxml) to rfc request.
mm_rfc_response_to_cxml_response -> mapping from rfc response to http response (cxml).
Interface Mappings
im_cxml_request_async_abs_to_rfc_request_async_abs
im_rfc_response_async_abs_to_cxml_response_async_abs
and the ID is configured like this:
Business system DES -> created business system for RFC adapter with interface mi_rfc_request_sync_in as receiver. Comunication channel u2018RFC Receiveru2019
Businnes service VW -> created businnes service for HTTP adapter with interface mi_cxml_request_sync_out as sender. Comunication channel u2018HTTP Senderu2019
Receiver Determination
two receiver determinations. One for BPM and the other one for RFC(R/3):
|VW| mi_cxml_request_sync_out:
|BPM_PO| mi_rfc_request_sync_abs:
Interface Determination
two interface determinations:
|VW| mi_cxml_request_sync_out | | BPM_PO:
|BPM_PO| mi_rfc_request_sync_abs | * | * :
Sender Agreement
VW
mi_cxml_request_sync_out
Receiver Agreement
|BPM_PO| |DES| mi_rfc_request_sync_in

hi all,
i've removed the transformations from the BPM, and i've created:
in IR:
- interface mapping: im_xcml_request_to_rfc_request_sync_abs
                                source interface: mi_cxml_request-sync_abs
                                target interface: mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
in ID:
- receiver determination: |VW| mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
                                  sender service: VW
                                  interface: mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
                                  receiver: DES
                                  interface mapping:im_xcml_request_to_rfc_request_sync_abs
- interface determination: |VW| mi_cxml_erquest_sync_abs ||
                                     sender service: VW
                                     interface: mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
                                     inbound interface: mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
                                     interface mapping: im_xcml_request_to_rfc_request_sync_abs
- receiver agreement: |VW| |DES| mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
                               sender service: VW
                               receiver service: DES
                               receiver interface: mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
not sure these are the steps i had to do for mapping xml to rfc. but the result is the same error as before, the timeout.
i couldn't test with RTW because i'm getting an error 401 unauthorized.
i'd do it without BPM but the issue is that i wanted to add another step that would be to send the response from rfc to mail too once i got this BPM running. i mean, the response from RFC would be sent to http response and mail both.
the only way i can imagine to do it is with BPM but i'm really fed up with it.
thank u very much folks

Sync/Async Bridge without Asynchronous Send / Receive Steps

Hello together,
we have a synchronous HTTP <--> RFC Scenario using a sync/async Bridge in BPM with the following characteristics:
1. HTTP Payload is received (opens Sync/Async bridge)
2. lookup is done in an LDAP System (we use an UDF here)
3. Customzied JCo is called which takes the XML String as input parameter (done by Java Mapping)
4. Return Value of JCo then is delivered back to HTTP Client (closes Sync/Async Bridge)
--> No RFC Adapter is used here as the provided JCo does all the parsing
When testing the sync/async bridge is started but we receive an timeout after 30 sec.
Could it be that the sync/async required exactly a pair of async send and receive steps (which we do not have in our scenario and which we do not need)?
This would be a problem, as we have to use BPM in this synchronous scenario. Do you have any idea?
Thank you very much for your help.

Thank you for your reply, but I think you misunderstood me. Please let me try to clarify once more:
1. Synchronous HTTP Sender Interface (Request/Response) opens Sync/Async Bridge
2. LDAP Lookup is done by UDF using the Request Message in Transformation Step
3. Switch is done based on result of Lookup
4. Branch 1 in switch calls customized JCo with Java Mapping in Transformation Step (Request Message as input, Response message as output)
5. Response message (delivered from JCo Call) should close the Async/Sync Bridge and be send back to HTTP Sender
--> We have no async send / receive steps in this scenario.
The customized Jco has been provided by an external partner as there is lots of parsing logic implemented. So we want to connect to the backend SAP system using this JCo and not via a send step.
My key qestion is therefore: Is it absolutely necessary to use exactly a pair of async send / receive steps in a sync/async bridge?
In this case we have to look for another design concept without BPM which would make the solution very difficult I think....

BPM Sync/Async Bridge

Hi,
I am trying to build a Async/Sync Bridge in BPM. However the difference is that I need the response to be sent to a different third party to the one which sent it.
The complete scenario is as follows: A third party sends an XML file - this is picked up with the file adapter. PI then does the appropriate mapping and calls a BAPI on ECC. The response is then sent back to PI and sent to a different third parties WebService.
I have followed the document "Demonstrating How to Use Async/Sync Bridge in BPM" by Leela Ratna Morampudi.
Sending the response back to the original sender is straight forward engough. However Im not sure how to send it back to a different third party? Is this possible? Any help would be appreciated
Also, Is it possible to build this scenario using a JMS Async/Sync bridge and avoid using a BPM?
Rg,
Krishneel

Hi Swarup,
Thanks for your posts.
I have built everything, however I'm facing some problems with the RFC receiver. In the communication channel monitor I see this error:
Message processing failed. Cause: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: com.sap.aii.adapter.rfc.afcommunication.RfcAFWException: error while processing message to remote system:com.sap.aii.adapter.rfc.core.client.RfcClientException: could not get functionname from XML requst: com.sap.aii.adapter.rfc.RfcAdapterException: failed to read funtionname from XML document: missing namespace declaration(2)
Do you know what could be wrong?
I have already tried reimporting the BAPI and refreshing the caches without any luck.
Thanks,
Krishneel

Async/Sync without BPM

Hi Experts, Just wondering if this scenario is possible? Client Proxy (Async) -> Web Service (Sync) -> Server Proxy (Async) I've read some blogs about the bridge using module processor (RequestResponseBean/ResponseOnewayBean). But usually, I only see the sender being synchronous given that Async cannot be mapped to a Sync interface.The reason behind this scenario is to take advantage of the queueing mechanism of Async and to make the scenario loosely coupled. Do we have other ways to do this without BPM and coding? Thanks in advance.

Hi Mark
I think it's possible. You have to use request response bean in the receiver adapter.
The response bean will trigger a new interface and you have to configure one more ICO to map
that response to final async server proxy.
Generic PI Async-Sync Bridge Configuration for Any Adapters
You have to use virtual receiver for second scenario.

Async-Sync-Async Bridge Without BPM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for