AUC distribution and settlement

Hello gurus
can anybody give me the answer
When we are during AUC what is happening in distribution and settlement
when settle the assets what is the with line item and without line item
Regards
Sri

Hi
Distribution means, the AUC amount is distributed as a Percentage or Equivalent amount or Quantity of the AUC amount. For Ex: If AUC is 1000000, then the AUC amount of 10lakhs can be either settled by percentage or by quantity (for example, Rs.10 lakhs for 5 numbers of assets, 5 is the quantity here) or equivalent amount which might be full 10 lakhs or 350000 for one asset and 500000 on another asset and the balance on some other asset to be distributed.
in case of settlement, the AUC Asset is credited and Main Asset is debited when we settle the AUC asset through AIBU or
CO88.
Now coming to Line Item and with out LIne Item. in case of AUC Line item settlement is possible. The number of line itmes posted to the same AUC Asset, can be settled to various main assets. For ex : The above 10 lakhs is actually entered thorugh 20 line items of Rs. 50000 each. Now, these 20 line items can be settled to ONE main Asset or 6 line items can be settled to one main asset and the balance 14 line items can be settled to another Main asset. This is Line Item settlement.
In case of No Line item settlement, usually AUC assets values are to be settled to Main Assets. In case of Main Assets, further settlement is not required. For ex : AUC Asset value is 10 lakhs, Now this 10 lakhs should be settled to Main Asset Buiding. So Line item settlement is possible only for AUC assets. Main Asset Building need not be settled to another asset. So when we create the Building Asset Class, we select NO line item settlement possible.
hope you got the answer.
if so, you know what to do to satisfy me.
Thanks
Rishikesh

Similar Messages

AUC distribution and settlement based on quantity

we have a requirement. my client want to procure 100 air conditioners under AUC, and want to capitalize it at the time of putting it to use. So, we need to capitalize the asset based on quantity. Is there any method to distribute/settle based on quantity. As i can only find option of percentage and amount in distribution rule.
regards

hi,
did you try it with
Equivalence number for order settlement
The costs collected in the sender object are distributed to the settlement receivers, in proportion to the equivalence numbers.
Kind Regards
Tarik

Distribution and settlement of capital assets

Hi!
How do we distribute, settle capital assets under construction?
How to define maximum amount for low value asset in depreciation areas?
Thank you
DD

Hi!
For AUC you need to carry out below:
-Enter distribution rules
-Transfer assets under construction
-Reverse settlement of assets under construction
How to define maximum amount for low value asset in depreciation areas?
Via Customizing.TCODE ::OAYK
Below Path :
Asset Accounting ->Valuation -> Amount Specifications (Company Code/Depreciation Area) -> Specify Max. Amount for Low-Value Assets + Asset Classes.
Cheers,
Sudhanshu
My points...
Message was edited by:
Sudhanshu Shekhar Tiwary

AUC and settlement rule mismatch.

Hi,
We have created many AUCs while uploading initial data at the time of go-live by posting JVs on WBSE and then performing the settlement. Now due to some currency issues we have reversed all settlements, and then Asset accounting person has resetted the asset register.
now when I am trying to create AUC from CJ20N, system creates AUC and provides the number. but this newly generated AUC number is not matching with the AUC in settlement rule. I can't delete the old settlement rule as the settlement performed on that. as well as I am not able to add new AUC in settlement rule.
Please let me know if there is any program / tcode which can remove this inconsistency. or is there any other procedure to make it streamline.
Please help.
Regards,
Nilesh.

Hi,
There is no error message in this case.
The scenario is like:
I have one WBSE and AUC is created for this WBS. for example AUC number is 1. the WBSE is released and some cost has incurred on it. during periodic settlement the cost is settled on the AUC.
Now the Client FICO team observed that the asset accounting is wrong due to currency conversion problem, so FICO team decided to reset the asset register and upload the entire master with new corrections. this will reset the AUCs as well.
so i reversed the settlement done on AUC and got the cost back on WBSE.
FICO team has resetted the asset register and all AUCs got deleted.
Now the issue is: WBSE is having AUC #1 in settlement rule which can not be deleted as settlement is carried out on this rule.
But when I create new AUC for WBS it is being created as some different number, (lets say #7) so even if now I run settlement the settlement will be done on AUC #1 insted of #7 even though #1 belongs to some other WBSE now in new scenario.
I hope I have clearly mentioned the issue.
Regards,
Nilesh

Internal order posted and settled to auc in incorrect ccode and fiscal year

Hi,
We created an internal order in ian ncorrect company code and settled the cost to AUC in previous fiscal year.
I would like to know what options do you recommend to move the AUC cost from incorrect company code to internal order in a correct company in the current fiscal year. Our AUC account is set up as control account and cannot be manually posted to.
I understand Internal order settlement to AUC for previous fiscal period cannot be reversed in the current year?.
Kindly advise
Umang

Hi
Select the Internal order > Reverse the settlement in the same year...(KO88)
Try to transfer the balance from this IO to new IO in the other co code from (F-02)..
You need to have Inter Co clearing accounts in the IMG....
now settle the new IO to new asset (AUC) in the other company
Br, Ajay M

How sales and distribution and customer service are related

Respected,
I am sales and distribution consultant but at present I am working on customer service and sales and distribution simultaneously and I use to face the problems in customer service part of CRM so do they co relate with each other .

Hi Avanish,
Please note Customer Service is a combination of Sales & Distribution and Plant Maintenance. the difference in between them, it is that:-
1. Plant Maintenance is being done withing a company / plant, so billing is not get generated.
2. Customer Service is used to external customer, so billing gets done and customers settles the bill.
Thanks & Regards,
Rahul Verulkar

Variance Calculation and Settlement

Hello Gurus,
While performing period end closing, the variance calculated (KKS6) amount is not the same as the amount in settlement (KK87). Both are picking up the same variance categories for the material but with different values. can you please let me know the reason for this.
Note: This error occurs only for one company code, other company codes calculate and settle the same amount. WIP and scrap is not being used by the company codes.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Friend,
did you check whehter all your allocation and distribution cycles related to that company code are executed.
in my opinion you need to check if that is executed and again compare the both reports
Best Regards,

AuC created and posting entries throu KO88 but i dont see any depreciation

An AuC has been created and also capitalized using t-code KO88 but i dont see any depreciation for a long time.
Can someone please understand me the complete concept of AuC and how the depreciation is calculated.
- Sudhir Krishna Kumar SIngh

Hi Dear,
Internal order settlement :- In standard SAP ,generally we are settle P&L expenses to CWIP ( Asset under constructions) though internal order system,which same P&L expenses transferred to as balance sheet value under fixed asset group. All AUC assets are having depreciation key 0000 or any other key with 0 %.
Once WIP has been capitalized , business user settle the AUC asset and transfer same values to direct asset.
Process :-
1. Create new asset under required asset class
2. AUC Settlement ... AIAB Transaction code ,where you have to select how much amount need to be transfer to direct assets.
after that ,you have to click on settlement button.
Rgds
Suma

Form Layer 2 to Layer 3 on Distribution and Access

Hi,
Our LAN topology have Core "L3" , Ditribution "L2" and Access "L2". We want to get rid of spanning tree by moving from layer 2 to layer 3 on Access and Distribution layers.
My questions is:
1) Any advice/document on this?
2) in the access switches did I have to configure each interface on 3750 as routed port by issueing "ip routing" and giving an IP address of each port ????. if this is the case than I will need huge amount of IP addresses.
Thanks

Hi
Much of this has already been covered off.
Just to add, I have implemented both routed access-layer and L2 access-layer and each has advantages and disadvantages.
Major advantages for L3
1) STP contained with wiring closet. Yes you can use RPVST+ but you still are extending L2 links between the distribution and access-layer with all that implies eg broadcast traffic. In addtion to utilise both uplinks at the same time requires a lot of extra configuration ie. setting root bridges for odd and even vlans and matching that to active HSRP gateways etc.
2) Automatic equal cost load-balancing (see previous point )
3) Easier troubleshooting. As previous poster said this is a matter of opinion and i have more experience with switching to be honest but i think troubleshooting L3 routing problems is generally easier than L2 STP problems.
Disadvantages
1) Vlan's cannot be extended across floors. May or may not be a problem for you.
2) If your distribution layer utilises 6500's with service modules eg the Firewall Service Module then layer 2 links give you more flexibility in deployment.
3) Cost can be an issue although your 3750's would support EIGRP stub functionality with only the base image.
As another poster pointed out, STP has come a long way from it's 50 seconds failover and with the correct setup it is nowhere near as important that you try and remove it.
I am just as much in favour of L2 access as L3 and most of major sites utilise L2 from the access-layer but with the speed/performance and cost of L3 switching you can get nowadays using L3 is a viable alternative.
HTH
Jon

Grant access to help desk users to add members to distribution and security groups

Hello,
I am trying to create a set of help desk users that has full access to add or remove members from distribution and security groups as well as update users. We want it to bypass owner approval and essentially allow this group to add or remove members
in the FIM Portal and flow it down to ADS.
This obviously works fine if one is a member of the Administrators set, but we want a second tier of power users with limitied rights compared to FIM Admins. We have added the help desk team to the Security Group Users and Group Users set as
well as MPR "Security group management: Users can read selected attributes of group resources".
The help desk users can update users in the Portal with no issue. The can search groups with no issue but when they try to add members to a group they get the error "Access Denied".
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks!

I'm having very similar problem - I have users with delegated right to modify group membership only. User can add someone to group and it works fine, but when the same user is trying to remove and user from a group (even if this is the same user
which was added a minute ago) he gets Access Denied:
The
request included members which the requestor is not authorized
to add and/or remove from this group."
It is caused by default MPR:
Group management workflow: Validate requestor on remove member
Question is how this activity validates this request - any insight?

Intercompany Netting and Settlement process

Hi Guys,
I am new to the intercompany transactions. Please anyone of you can explain or guide me to some documentation on what intercompany netting and settlement process means and how to do it...that would be great.
Thanks and Regards,
MS

Hello,
If you can let us know the business scenario and context in which you are asking, it would be better for us to explain in more detail.
However, you can go through the following just for your clarification.
You can post the cross company code postings even between two controlling areas. The system does not prevent to post documents between two company codes in two controlling area. Need not necessarily they should be under one operating concern. Provided you have to make sure that you have followed the following points:
In OBY6 - To company codes must be assigned to same Company, meaning that you mus thave created a Company and that company must have been assigned to these two company codes.
OBYA - You should maintain the clearing accounts in both the company codes. Meaning that you are posting one leg in one company code and the other leg in the other company. Therefore, it is required to have the missing legs in each company code.
Company Code1 - Posting Key 40 - Clearing Account
Company Code1 - Posting Key 50 - Clearing Account
Company Code2 - Positng Key 40 - Clearing Account
Company Code2 - Posting Key 50 - Clearing Account
OB08 - In case if the two company codes have different local (company code) currencies, you may maintain the exchange rates.
You can now go to F-02 and post a cross company code transaction giving the first leg in first company code and the second leg in second company code. Missing leg in the first company code will be posted to the GL Account mentioned in OBYA and the missing leg in the second company code will be posted to the GL Account mentioned in OBYA. That means you will have four line items overall.
The system will post three document.
Document 1 in First Company Code
Document 2 in Second Company Code
and
Document3 - Cross Company Code Document.
The cross company code document consists of the first company code document number plus company code plus last two digits of the fiscal year.
Hope this must have clarified your doubts.
Please let me know in case if you need further details.
Thanks,
Ravi

Material distribution and division wise

hi experts,
I need to take report what are all the items belongs to a particular distribution and division.
regards
arun

Dear SP ,
You can get sales orders report Material wise through VA05 transaction.
In the VA05 selection screen you enter Sold-to-party ,Material and selection date then click on Further sel,criteria tab (Push button) in the top of the screen ,system will take you to the selection fields there you enter the distribution channels(or Division or any other fields) from and to then execute the report.
System will give the details of the report with that selection fields.
I hope it will help you
Regards
Murali.
Edited by: Murali Mohan.T on Mar 30, 2008 10:17 AM
Edited by: Murali Mohan.T on Mar 30, 2008 10:26 AM

Costs and settled costs layout in standard reports

Hello guys !
what needs to be done in order to have a report, for example, S_ALR_87013543 , splitted by costs and settled costs (debit/credit) ? I can't find a layout or smth.
Thanks guys.
Laimonas

Hi
Include this ZPP2 in a separate report group (GR51)... After that,
1. Create the transaction code,say, ZF01_TCODE from Se93
2. Choose "Transaction with parameters".. Press enter
3. Enter START_REPORT in the Transaction field and press Enter
4. Select the Skip initial screen and Inherit GUI attributes check boxes
5. On the same screen, scroll down to the Default Values table and select parameters D_SREPOVARI-REPORTTYPE and
D_SREPOVARI-REPORT.
6. Enter RW for the report type and your report group ZCC8 as the report value
7. Now you can save your transaction and transport it to other systems
Regards
Ajay M

List of orders for which varience calculated and settled

Dear Friends,
How to list out the production orders for which variance calculated and settled by each period wise,Please give me a solution.

Hi,
U can find some status of order in COOIS T code or in Order it self.
Go to COOIS
Select the option in status field.
SETT - Order Settled,
SETC - Settlement Rule Created
SETM - Settlement rule created manually.
TECO - Techo (Once order is Completed).
without techo order is not settled.
Regards,
Pavan PP

Consignment and settlement

Hi Friends,
My user is running MRKO t.code and settling the documents and he is getting message like "Consignment settlement : No message was found for partner 266666/Company code".
I have maintained KONS condition for the vendor and in the combination (com.code + vendor) table i have maintained printer also. But this is happening for one user for other user it is working. I checked up both the roles no difference.
Please advise
Thanks in advance
Balu

Hi Anil,
How you are getting ZERO and Negative Vale for consignment?
Consignment settlement will happens after withdrawal of goods or after Sales based on your Consignment Purchase Info record.
Bye,
Muralidhara

AUC distribution and settlement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for