Audigy 2, X-Fi, or VIA Vinyl for Win7

% Finally upgraded to Win7 from XP but now I'm torn on what to do about audio. ?I was using the audigy 2 but the drivers for win7 seemed shaky so I've been using my onboard VIA Vinyl audio. ?Seems to work ok but I'm bummed after I discovered I only get crappy 2.0 software sound in LOTRO. ?I was thinking about upgrading to x-fi but x-fi + lotro = BSOD apparently. ?Anyone have any adviceAnyone having good luck with audigy 2 in win7?

iain_uk wrote:
OK so the x-fi extreme audio isnt a true x-fi card, I get that (the cheeky beggers!).
Kudos for the heads up
Apart from that, no, there isn't anything particularly bad, and for its price it is perhaps the best thing you can get (think of it as an Audigy 2 SE with upgraded drivers), since there isn't really anything better in the mid-tier.
If all you want is something to replace the onboard that will work reliably under Vista, then it's perfect for the job, although the relati'vely small price difference with a bulk Xtreme Gamer may tempt you to make the big step to the "true" X-Fis. However, don't fall for it unless you are ready to cope with a lot of potential problems and reduced Vista functionality.
If you can find the bulk edition of the Xtreme Audio, then I'd say go for it.

Similar Messages

Realtek vs. Via Vinyl, which is better sound quality

I downloaded the Via Vinyl Codec in an attempt to fix the Internet noise sound talked about in this https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=75995.0 post and all is well since. Tiresmoke, or anyone else using Via Vinyl, what do you think of the sound quality. I think there seems to be a little less bass response, nothing major, but a little different. Also, the EQ is set up a little different. What is your take on it? Can you think of a reason why MSI went with Realtek on Sound if Via has their own solution built into the southbridge? It is widely held as better quality? Also, what about the actual realtek audio chip on the motherboard? What is it doing if you are using Vinyl besides collecting dust? Any idea on which uses more CPU time? I know this is a lot of questions, but I'm curious.

Thanks for the reply Tiresmoke. I guess no one else is giving the Via Vinyl a shot. Given that the Realtek is a separate add-in solution on the motherboard, one would think it would be better to warrant its existence. However, in this crazy silicon world, who knows.

Audigy 2 NS to PS2 via toslink optical ca

I want surround sound for DVDs, so I'm trying to hook my Klipsch Promedia Ultra's up to my PS2 via my Audigy 2 NS as the decoder... I've hooked it all up - but the mute button's LED is always lit up, and hitting the button won't "unmute" the sound card. Any ideas?

Badboy is correct, the Audigy 2 NX is a USB solution for the PC, it does not work standalone, and it will not decode from external sources. If you need a similar card that can be used in standalone, the Extigy will do this, but is an older product so you might have to buy it secondhand.
Alternati'vely you could consider a speakerset like the Inspire TD7700, which is a speakerset that has a decoder that you can connect directly to your PS2. The decoder is available seperately aswell (DDTS-00), and you can use it in combination with our analog speakersets.
Cat

XModem via TCP for Java

I am sure that many of you experienced developers have read requests in the past concerning implmentation of Ward Christenen's XModem protocol over a TCP socket. If not, well... you are about to...
This is a major hack... but it is starting to come together... thanks to Fred Potter for his source code to start this project...
Objective:
Basically, I want to create a console application which accepts an incoming connection and starts the receive mode for a XModem file transfer. I am using CGTerm (for Commodore retrocomputing) but can test with HyperTerminal as well...
The user who connects to the server selects SEND and the FILE to send for a XModem file transfer... and the transfer begins...
The incoming blocks of 128 bytes are written to a file
After the transfer is over the server disconnects the client terminal.
Here is what I have so far:
import java.net.*;
import java.lang.*;
import java.io.*;
// X-Modem Server implementation via TCP/IP socket
public class XServer {
public static FileWriter fw;
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
// define the file
try {
fw = new FileWriter("filename.txt");
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println(e);
System.exit(0);
int port = Integer.parseInt(args[0]);
ServerSocket server = new ServerSocket(port);
System.out.println("X-Server v1.0 - waiting for connection");
Socket client = server.accept();
// Handle a connection and exit.
try {
InputStream inputStream = client.getInputStream();
OutputStream outputStream = client.getOutputStream();
new PrintStream(outputStream).println("Go to send file mode!"); // sent to client
System.out.println("Ready to receive file via X-Modem...");
* BEGIN TRANSFER HERE!
// set the debug flag
XModem.debug = true;
* Here we are instantiating a new InputStream that represents the remote
* file that we are receiving. In this single line we are attempting to
* start the flow.
* Behind The Scenes: We're sending a NAK across the serial line repeatedly
* until we finaly start seeing the data flow. If we don't see the data
* flow, then we throw an exception.
System.out.println("Sending NAK to start receive mode...");
InputStream incomingFile;
try {
incomingFile = new XModemRXStream(inputStream, outputStream);
} catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println("ERROR! Unable to start file transfer!");
e.printStackTrace();
return;
System.out.println("Starting file transfer...");
* Here we are reading from the incoming file, byte by byte, and printing out.
* Behind The Scenes: Internally, the read() method is handling the task of
* asking for the next data block from the remote computer, processing it (i.e.
* parsing, running checksums), and then putting it in an internal buffer. Not
* all calls to read() will request a new data block as each block contains at
* least 128 bytes of data. Sometimes you will only hit the buffer.
try {
for (;;) {
int c = incomingFile.read();
if (c==-1)
break; // End of File
// print character / byte
System.out.print(c+",");
// write to file
try {
//System.out.print(".");
fw.write(c);
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println(e);
System.exit(0);
} catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println("error while reading the incoming file.");
e.printStackTrace();
return;
// done
System.out.println("File sent.");
new PrintStream(outputStream).println("");
new PrintStream(outputStream).println("transfer successful!");
} finally {
//client.close();
// save the file
try {
fw.close();
System.out.println("file saved.");
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println(e);
System.exit(0);
* XModem keeps track of settings that the Receive and Transmit Stream classes will
* reference.
* <p>Copyright: Copyright (c) 2004</p>
* @author Fred Potter
* @version 0.1
class XModem {
public static boolean debug = false;
* XModemRXStream is an easy to use class for receiving files via the XModem protocol.
* @author Fred Potter
* @version 0.1
class XModemRXStream
extends InputStream {
// CONSTANTS
private static final int SOH = 0x01;
private static final int EOT = 0x04;
private static final int ACK = 0x06;
private static final int NAK = 0x15;
private static final int CAN = 0x18;
private static final int CR = 0x0d;
private static final int LF = 0x0a;
private static final int EOF = 0x1a;
// block size - DON'T CHANGE - I toyed with the idea of adding 1K support but the code is NOT there yet.
private static final int bs = 128;
// PRIVATE STUFF
private int ebn; // expected incoming block #
private byte[] data; // our data buffer
private int dataPos; // our position with the data buffer
private InputStream in;
private OutputStream out;
* Creates a new InputStream allowing you to read the incoming file. All of the XModem
* protocol functions are handled transparently.
* As soon as this class is instantiated, it will attempt to iniatate the transfer
* with the remote computer - if unsuccessful, an IOException will be thrown. If it
* is successful, reading may commense.
* NOTE: It is important not to wait too long in between calls to read() - the remote
* computer will resend a data block if too much time has passed or even just give up
* on the transfer altogether.
* @param in InputStream from Serial Line
* @param out OutputStream from Serial Line
public XModemRXStream(InputStream in, OutputStream out) throws
IOException {
this.in = in;
this.out = out;
// Initiate the receive sequence - basically, we send a NAK until the data
// starts flowing.
init:for (int t = 0; t < 10; t++) {
if (XModem.debug) {
System.out.println("Waiting for response [ try #" + t + " ]");
long mark = System.currentTimeMillis();
out.write(NAK);
// Frequently check to see if the data is flowing, give up after a couple seconds.
for (; ; ) {
if (in.available() > 0) {
break init;
try {
Thread.sleep(10);
catch (Exception e) {}
if (System.currentTimeMillis() - mark > 2000) {
break;
// We have either successfully negotiated the transfer, OR, it was
// a failure and timed out. Check in.available() to see if we have incoming
// bytes and that will be our sign.
if (in.available() == 0) {
throw new IOException();
// Initialize some stuff
ebn = 1; // the first block we see should be #1
data = new byte[bs];
dataPos = bs;
* Reads the next block of data from the remote computer. Most of the real XModem protocol
* is encapsulated within this method.
* @throws IOException
private synchronized void getNextBlock() throws IOException {
if (XModem.debug) {
//System.out.println("Getting block #" + ebn);
// Read block into buffer. There is a 1 sec timeout for each character,
// otherwise we NAK and start over.
byte[] buffer;
recv:for (; ; ) {
buffer = new byte[bs + 4];
for (int t = 0; t < 10; t++) {
System.out.println("\nReceiving block [ #" + ebn + " ]");
// Read in block
buffer = new byte[buffer.length];
for (int i = 0; i < buffer.length; i++) {
int b = readTimed(1);
// if EOT - don't worry about the rest of the block.
if ( (i == 0) && (b == EOT)) {
buffer[0] = (byte) (b & 0xff);
break;
// if CAN - the other side has cancelled the transfer
if (b == CAN) {
throw new IOException("cancelled");
if (b < 0) {
if (XModem.debug) {
System.out.println("Time out... NAK'ing");
out.write(NAK);
continue recv;
else {
buffer[i] = (byte) (b & 0xFF);
break;
int type = buffer[0] & 0xff; // either SOH or EOT
if (type == EOT) {
if (XModem.debug) {
System.out.println("EOT!");
out.write(ACK);
break;
int bn = buffer[1] & 0xff; // block number
int bnc = buffer[2] & 0xff; // one's complement to block #
if (
(bn != ebn) && (bn != (ebn - 1)) ||
(bn + bnc != 255)) {
if (XModem.debug) {
System.out.println("NAK'ing type = " + type + " bn = " + bn +
" ebn = " +
ebn + " bnc = " + bnc);
out.write(NAK);
continue recv;
byte chksum = buffer[ (buffer.length - 1)];
byte echksum = 0;
for (int i = 3; i < (buffer.length - 1); i++) {
echksum = (byte) ( ( (echksum & 0xff) + (buffer[i] & 0xff)) & 0xff);
if (chksum != echksum) {
out.write(NAK);
continue recv;
out.write(ACK);
if (ebn == 255) {
ebn = 0;
else {
ebn++;
break;
// We got our block, now save it in our data buffer.
data = new byte[bs];
for (int i = 3; i < (buffer.length - 1); i++) {
data[(i - 3)] = buffer;
dataPos = 0;
public synchronized int read() throws IOException {
// If at the end of our buffer, refill it.
if (dataPos == bs) {
try {
getNextBlock();
catch (IOException e) {
throw new IOException();
// If we're still at end of buffer, say so.
if ( dataPos == bs) {
return -1;
int d = data[dataPos];
if (d == EOF)
return -1;
dataPos++;
return d;
* A wrapper around the native read() call that provides the ability
* to timeout if no data is available within the specified timeout value.
* @param timeout timeout value in seconds
* @throws IOException
* @return int an integer representing the byte value read.
private int readTimed(int timeout) throws IOException {
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (; ; ) {
if (in.available() > 0) {
return (in.read());
try {
Thread.sleep(10);
catch (InterruptedException ex) {
//if (System.currentTimeMillis() - start > timeout * 1000) {
if (System.currentTimeMillis() - start > timeout * 5000) {
return -1;
Here was the output...
Original file:
(Commodore CBM SEQ file exported to PC using DirMaster)
��
� �
� ��
� ��
� ��
��
� ��
� � ��
��
� � ��OWERED BY �OLOR 64 �� V8
�UNNING �ETWORK64 V1.26A
�
�UPPORTING 38400 �AUD �ATES
��/��/��
�
�ESTING �CHO-�ET V1 BETA
�
�EATURING �ESSAGES, �ILES,
�ET�AIL, AND �NLINE �AMES!
�YS�P: � � � � � � � � �
�
�RESS ANY KEY TO LOGIN\C�
The result when the file was uploaded and received by my XServer:
? ? ??OWERED BY ?OLOR 64 ??? V8
?UNNING ?ETWORK64 V1.26A
?UPPORTING 38400 ?AUD ?ATES
?ESTING ?CHO-?ET V1 BETA
?EATURING ?ESSAGES, ?ILES,
?ET?AIL, AND ?NLINE ?AMES!
?YS?P: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
?RESS ANY KEY TO LOGIN\C?
The result is different!
Can someone help me along here... I have been trying to figure out how to do this for approx. a year or so... it has been a very slow process.
I could use a guru to help me out so I can write the upload and download routines for my Commodore BBS PETSCII Emulation Server.
Visit http://www.retrogradebbs.com for details.
Thanks.
Please help out a dedicated developer who is in over his head...
-Dave

Ok. Fair enough. What about general information about Xmodem. This is a hard project because of how obscure the legacy technology is that I am having to implement using Java and MySQL.
I have two major issues which I have to figure out how to troubleshoot and debug, if possible.
1. The 23+ blocks exception when a file is being received
2. The exception which is thrown immediately if I try to receive a binary file instead of an ASCII file.
I read that telnet is a 7-bit technology and that is why Xmodem, which is an 8-bit technology is not that popular as a viable protocol via telnet, whereas Kermit is, since it was developed for 7-bit systems, i.e. mainframes and minicomputers.
Is this correct?
If that is the case, why does www.serio.com have a viable X-Y-ZModem library available (for several hundred $$$ of course) which can be used with both RS-232 serial ports and TCP socket ports? Obviously, it can be done. They are the ONLY company with this library for sale for Java to do this. I cannot justify that $$$ amount for a mere hobby (writing the BBS emulation server for supporting Commodore PETSCII (CG) callers via CGTerm or a native C-64 terminal program using Jim Brain's TCPSER middleware, which emulates a Hayes modem via telnet for telBBSing/retrocomputing.
I really want to learn how to implement a file transfer protocol, since back in the 80s, I used Xmodem, Punter, Y/Z Modem, etc., a lot to upload and download files via modem at baud rates of 2400, 14.4, 19.2, and 38.4, respectively.
It's fun to learn how the old skool gurus of telecommunications technology did it. It is one thing to run a BBS which supports these technologies and features, and it is an entirely other thing to learn how to design and develop them yourself for implementation into a project such as I taken on.
It CAN be done. It WILL be done. However, I have just started my exhaustive research on how it needs to be done. I have read up as much as I could on XModem by Ward C., the father of the protocol.
But, I have no information to help me figure out why the communications are acting as they do so far.
Can someone please download the xserver.zip file on my website at:
www.retrogradebbs.com/projects/xserver.zip
Compile it. Run it. Connect using HyperTerminal, Netrunner, or another telnet terminal emulation program which supports Xmodem file transfers using WinSock.
See what happens. With finals due in the next two days, this project will have to be put on hold until after I submit my two final projects.
If anyone knows what needs to be done to support both ASCII and BINARY file transfers via Xmodem via a socket instead of a modem with RTS/CTS hardware flow control, please respond.
I know for a fact that this can be done.
- Dave

How can I connect my '07 MBP to an HDTV via HDMI for audio/video?

How can I connect my '07 MBP to an HDTV via HDMI for audio/video?

About Mini DisplayPort to HDMI adapters
Stefan

I transferred a pages file from ipad to mac (also pages) via email for editing. However received message that cannot save edited document to the mac because "trial period has expired for iwork"! I have purchased pages for both machines separately. Ideas?

I transferred a pages file from ipad to mac (also pages) via email for editing. It opened normally. However, after editing, received message that cannot save edited document to the mac because "trial period has expired for iwork"! I have purchased pages for both machines separately and presumed they would work without a hitch. Am I missing something?

It used to be that to update the trial to the licensed version with the box, you just inserted the DVD & ran the installer to convert the trial to licensed. This changed with Snow Leopard. You now need to delete the trial & then reinstall from the boxed DVD or the Mac App Store. The files to delete are the iWork ’09 folder from the main HD > Applications; the iWork ’09 folder in HD > Library > Application Support & the individual iWork application plist files found in HD > Users > (your account) > Library > Preferences for each user.
Yvan Koenig has written an AppleScript that removes the files. You can find it on his iDisk in For_iWork > iWork '09 > uninstall iWork '09.zip.

MfE uninstall - Sent via Mail for Exchange still e...

Hi,
On my new N97 I accidentally installed MfE trough the Wizard. Later I removed MfE succesfully, but now in the Contact list, under E-Mail there still is an entry "Sent via Mail for Exchange".
How can I remove that entry?
Best regards,
Wouter

Check in Messaging and see if Mail for Exchange is still listed as a folder.
If so, go to Options, Settings, E-Mail and you migth be able to remove it from there.

How to suspend the installation after downloading packages via ota for lollipop 5.0.1. on my Note 4. always asks me to install it on notification bar. thank you :)

How to suspend the installation after downloading packages via ota for lollipop 5.0.1. on my Note 4. always asks me to install it on notification bar. thank you

If you factory reset, it wont make the update go away, but you should back up and reset before you install the update.

CVS extension no longer available via "Check for Updates" ?

Hi,
It seems that CVS (or any other Versioning support tools) SQLDev extension are no longer available via "Check for Updates".
I've just downloaded 2.1.1.64 and tried to setup whatever extensions we used to use and they simply do not appear in the list.
Can this extension be downloaded as a bundle and installed from local file? Where from?
Oracle SQL Developer 2.1.1.64
Version 2.1.1.64
Build MAIN-64.45
IDE Version: 11.1.1.2.36.55.30
Product Version: 11.1.1.64.45
Java(TM) Platform 1.6.0_11
Oracle IDE 2.1.1.64.45
Versioning Support 2.1.1.64.45
Cheers
Arek
Edited by: Arek on Oct 12, 2010 7:11 PM

Thank you, Sue. Much appreciated.
FYI. I've just downloaded SQLDev 3EA release and I'm still facing the same problem.
Default Update Centers available are:
1) Oracle SQL Developer ( http://www.htmldb.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=raptor:updates )
2) Oracle Extensions ( http://www.oracle.com/ocom/groups/public/@otn/documents/webcontent/162031.xml )
3) Third Party SQL Developer Extensions ( http://www.oracle.com/ocom/groups/public/@otn/documents/webcontent/162031.xml )
When I mark the first two all I get at the next screen is two entries:
Oracle Product Extensions for SQL Developer (Hide) (- which is simply a header I suppose)
Oracle Rdb Extension 7.3 (Details)
The CVS extension jars can be copied from previous SQLDev installations (download used to work a couple of releases back), but it should be still available for download via "Check for Updates" or bundled with the product itself.
Regards
Arek
Edited by: Arek on Oct 15, 2010 2:05 PM

Cannot view workflow log via Services for Object Workflow Overview

We recently had an upgrade of R3/ECC and discovered a new issue. For some reason we can no longer view workflow log via Services for Object > Workflow Overview for Material Master (transaction MM03). We get the message "There are no workflows that have already worked with this object". However, we have confirmed via SWEL and other t-codes that the workflow and log do exist. This seems to be the only object we have this issue for after the upgrade.
Anyone know what issue is and how to fix?   Or at least path to config in SPRO for "generic object services" where we can see if anything changed via upgrade for this object?
Thanks,
Matt
Edited by: Matthew Huth on Apr 22, 2008 9:23 PM

Found the solution. See OSS note 553246. This has been tested and works for us.   -Matt
Note 553246
Summary
Symptom
In the material master, the system no longer displays the attachments for the material or workflow items in the Generic Object Services.
Other terms
MM01, MM02, MM03
Reason and Prerequisites
As of Release 4.6B, business object BUS1001006 is valid for the material master. Until you have implemented Note 452424, the Generic Object Services is still published for the old BUS1001 business object. After implementing the note, all attachments, relationships, notes and workflow items that are assigned to business object BUS1001 are no longer displayed.
Instead, all new attachments are assigned to business object BUS1001006. As a result, attachments cannot exist for both systems.
For workflow items, the assignment to the business object occurs in the respective tasks. It may be very time consuming to convert the business object, depending on whether an individual subtype (assigned to BUS1001) is created.
In other words, after you implement the note, the workflow items for business object BUS1001 can no longer be displayed in the material master.
Solution
With the following correction you can call the Generic Object Services for both business objects. When it is called, the system displays a dialog box in which you can choose the required business object, that is, BUS1001 ('Material') or BUS1001006 ('Standard material').
This correction is delivered as a modification supported by SAP only. This is because the additional option means that attachments can be maintained as required in either of the business objects and users may therefore require extra training.
However, the corrections enable you to display attachments and workflow items for both business objects without the need for a major conversion; this means that you do not get the impression that these have been lost.
Alternatively, as of Release 4.70 (or Basis 6.20) you can, without making a modification, implement method ADD_OBJECTS of BAdI GOS_MULT_PUBLISH for filter attribute WF_OVERVIEW ('Workflow overview'), SRELATIONS ('Relationships') and VIEW_ATTA ('Attachment list'). The implementation should be similar to the following:
METHOD if_ex_gos_mult_publish~add_objects .
DATA:
    ls_lporb TYPE sibflporb.
READ TABLE ct_lporb INTO ls_lporb INDEX 1.
if ls_lporb-typeid = 'BUS1001006'.
    ls_lporb-typeid = 'BUS1001'.
    append ls_lporb to ct_lporb.
endif.
endmethod.

Can't download JUNIT extension via "check for updates"

Hi,
since a few weeks (with jdev 11.1.1.1.0 and jdev 11.1.1.2.0) I can't download e.g. JUNIT extensions via "check for updates".
I have to enter a password but authentication is not possible.
Even when I reset the passord (via "find password") it does not work any more.
Im 100% sure that this worked some time ago without problems.
I can access http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/101/update/center.xml#oracle.jdeveloper.junit and download the extension manually.
regards
Peter

Peter,
no problems on my side with my account. I did it yesterday without any problem.
Timo

No transfer order created via VL10A for certain shipping point

No transfer order created automatically via VL10A for a certain shipping point.
For Shipping Point E004 the TO is automatically created in VL10A, but for Shipping Point E070 it's not automatically created.
Could you kindly let me know why TO is not automatically created by Tcd VL10A?

Automatic TO creation depends the warehouse number or movement type. Can you check the warehouse number for both shipping points?
Regards,

EWA via solman for SQL Server

Hi,
I'm trying to configure EWA via solman for an ECC 6.0 system on MS SQL 2005.
I've completed all the necessary steps i.e. all the RFC's are working fine, RTCCTOLL is ok, the report is getting generated in SDCCN on the satellite system...however it doesnt seem to get transfered to solman.
RSCOLL00 gives a weird "database system not supported " message although it shows finished successfully.
Is there some other program for SQL Server or maybe something that I'm missing...
Pls. help.
Thanks a lot,
Saba.

Hi Saba,
you can't schedule EWA for Solution manager sessions in SDCCN of the satellite. The only kind you can schedule in the satellite is the kind you send directly to SAP, that's why SDCC_OSS appears as the RFC connetion. You have to fetch EWA for Solution Manager sessions from the solution manager using a refresh sessions task. Does anything happen when you perform a refresh sessions task in SDCCN on the satellite (when you pick the RFC to Solution Manager as the destination)?
You should also check that the service definitions are current in both satellite and solution manager systems. Note 727998 explains how to delete and replace them. (Often the only way of being totally sure that the service defintions are correct.)
best regards,
-David.
Edited by: David Murphy on Nov 20, 2008 4:26 PM

HT201250 I have had my mac stolen, I have an external HD I connect via USB for these time machine backups, I now have a new replacement mac and wish to restore from my external HD, migration assistant doesn't seem to recognise or see my drive ? please hel

I have had my mac stolen, I have an external HD I connect via USB for these time machine backups, I now have a new replacement mac and wish to restore from my external HD, migration assistant doesn't seem to recognise or see my drive ? please help

See Pondini's Excellent information here...
Setting-up a new Mac from an old one, its backups, or a PC
See the Second Chance to Use Setup Assistant here...
http://Pondini.org/OSX/SetupLion.html

Neo V ICS Update via Bridge for Mac on Snow Leopard

I am trying to update my "neo v" via "bridge for mac" on my mac mini (10.6.8 - snow leaopard)
I am connecting in MSC mode as Phone is not detected by Bridge in MTP mode
In MSC mode I do get the notification for ICS update however, after the Prepare stage it asks me to switch to MTP mode.
I do so and nothing happens.
I disconnect and try to reconnect in MTP mode and nothing happens
Please help/advise

Please check this thread for a possible fix for this:
http://talk.sonymobile.com/message/185965#185965
What are your thoughts about this forum? Let us know by doing this short survey.
- Official Sony Xperia Support Staff
If you're new to our forums make sure that you have read our Discussion guidelines.
If you want to get in touch with the local support team for your country please visit our contact page.

Audigy 2, X-Fi, or VIA Vinyl for Win7

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for