No transfer order created via VL10A for certain shipping point

No transfer order created automatically via VL10A for a certain shipping point.
For Shipping Point E004 the TO is automatically created in VL10A, but for Shipping Point E070 it's not automatically created.
Could you kindly let me know why TO is not automatically created by Tcd VL10A?

Automatic TO creation depends the warehouse number or movement type. Can you check the warehouse number for both shipping points?
Regards,

Similar Messages

  • How to trun off batch determination for certain shipping points ?

    During Delivery Notes creation we would like to turn off the batch determination on basis of certail shipping points. can some please guide what is the best way to do it. We do not want it turned off for all the shipping points but for a special ones.
    The idea is when we create Delivey for certain shipping point we do not need to fill in the batch code and yets save, pick confim, goods issue during delivery creation process....
    we have sepcial shipping points for consignment process and for them we need to skip the batch determination......
    Thanks in advance
    Rajey

    I don;t think you  can control based on shipping point because batch creation is controlled at movement type level

  • Lock the production order creating without material for order type zp01

    Hi all,
    Good morning.My client wants to lock the production order creating without material for order type zp01.He does not want to create production order without material.Its very urgent.Please guide me the settings if any.
    Thanks and Regards
    Sukumar

    Hi Sukumar,
    You can do by applying user exit.
    Use PPCO0007 - Exit when saving production order.
    Function module - EXIT_SAPLCOZV_001.
    Include Program - ZXCO1U06
    Write your Code:
    *&  Include           ZXCO1U06
    Regards,
    Sankaran

  • There are several orders created via FS Charges screen.

    Hi All,
    I am able to see 5 orders created (Source reference) for the Service Request, but when i view it from Field Service i am able to see only one order that is tagged to all the charges.
    Please help me to trace back the root cause of this issue.
    I verified the following.
    I checked all the order source(Service Billing) hence it is not created manually or copied.
    the order that is tagged with the FS Charges is now closed, rest of the orders are in booked status.
    Regards,
    Muthulakshmi T.

    Hi,
    Thank you very much.
    Regrads
    Mahesh M J

  • Invoice Splitting - for some shipping points and not others

    Dear Gurus, I have a requirement where for some shipping points I need to be able to split an invoice on sales order (i.e. a separate invoice for each customer order) and for other shipping points I require a single invoice for multiple customer sales orders.  Using the copy control rules for LF to F2, I have set the Refence Number to B but this does not achieve what I want.  Would it be possible to achieve this via a copy requirements routine and by setting the values in VBRK-ZUKI?  Do I just copy the standard 003 routine and apply my changes here?  If yes, where do I insert the code - the top or bottom?  Regards

    In VOFM, first of all "Copying requirements" are used when we want to stop creating a target document from a source document or to prevent certain items from copying to target document under certain conditions. Copying requirements can't be used to do invoice split.
    Data transfer routines are the ones that allow invoice split (in addition to allowing copying fields from source to target). Although "copying requirements" is a loosely used terminology, it is important we make distinction between copying requirements and data transfer routines as both are different and perform different functions.
    SAP uses field VBRK-ZUKRI (a 40 character field) to store the combination of field values that are used as basis of invoice split. Invoice split happens if any of the fields stored in VBRK-ZUKRI differ across orders/deliveries (or their items) from which invoices are created.
    We assign VBRK-ZUKRI during item copy control in data transfer routines. The fields are simply concatenated and assigned to VBRK-ZUKRI.
    in VOFM, "Data transfer" routine 003 for Billing documents for example splits the invoice for each reference document, as shown by code below
    Include FV60C003
    *       For each reference document an invoice is created
    FORM DATEN_KOPIEREN_003.
      DATA: BEGIN OF ZUK,
              MODUL(3) VALUE '003',
              VTWEG LIKE VBAK-VTWEG,
              SPART LIKE VBAK-SPART,
              VGBEL LIKE VBRP-VGBEL,
            END OF ZUK.
      ZUK-VTWEG = VBAK-VTWEG.
      ZUK-SPART = VBAK-SPART.
      IF KURGV-PERFK = SPACE.
        ZUK-VGBEL = VBRP-VGBEL.
      ENDIF.
      VBRK-ZUKRI = ZUK.
    ENDFORM.
    In the above coding we are concatenating VBAK-VTWEG (Distr channel), VBAK-SPART (Division), VBRP-VGBEL (Reference Order from billing item) as the criteria for invoice split. So if any of these field differ then it will cause a split. So basically we are creating one invoice for all items that reference a single order
    So what you need to do for your requirement, is to copy the logic of data transfer routine 003 in VOFM to your own custom 9XX routine and make the assignment to ZUK / VBRK-ZUKRI only when shipping point (LIKP-VSTEL) is not equal to certain values that you don't want split to happen. It is better to maintain those shipping points in a custom table and make the check on the table rather than hard coding, so that in future it is easy to add more shipping points or remove existing ones if needed.
    Also remember to assign the new data transfer routine number 9XX to all relevant item categories in VTFL for your target billing type and reference delivery type

  • How could I config a Delivery Notes for a shipping point ?

    Hi Experts!
    I need to config a new delivery notes especially to tie a shipping point and a revenue channel...do you know how to proceed??
    Actually, my client already have a delivery note for a shipping point and a revenue channel, but now I need to create another type of delivery note with other number range for a different shipping point and revenue channel...
    I do not know the path in spro neither if I need to use a Tcode transaction....
    Please let

    the path is for creating new delivery types which can be processed thru txn vl01n, vl10b etc. when you want different delivery types to handle differnt sales document types.to deal with say free samples exports sales from depots etc differently.
    you must be meaning the output from vl03 , is it?

  • Transfer orders creating 921 storage errors.

    Hi All
    When we enter two or more parts at a time to transfer in MB1B its
    create transfer order for material in back ground, Also its create 921
    errors that need to be fixed in LT10 or the Workcenter trying to
    receive the parts as a transfer ends up with work orders that fail and
    914 errors that need to be fixed.
    kindly guid us how to eliminate the error.
    Regards,
    Mayank

    Hi,
    I found the problem. In certain conditions ( if the center is a distribution center - it is determined from table T001W ) the suppliyng storage location is cleared by standard.
    Kind regards,
    Paulo Sousa

  • Immediate Transfer Order Creation not occuring for Sales Document Type

    Hello gurus,
    I have a situation where a transfer order is not being created immediately for a specific sales document type.
    Here is an example document flow of a desired scenario where the system is working:
    Sales document type:  ZOR
    >  Delivery type:  LF
    >  WMS transfer order
    The Item Category in this scenario is TAN.
    Here is an example of the document flow in the current scenario where the system is not working:
    Sales document type:  ZPRD
    > Delivery type:  LF
    The Item Category is also TAN in this scenario.  The only identifiable difference in these scenarios is the sales document type.  For the ZOR SaTY, a Transfer Order prints immediately once the delivery is created.  For the ZPRD SaTY, a Transfer Order needs to be manually created after delivery creation.
    Is there a configuration setting that is controlling this?  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Thank you very much for the link.  When I insert the WMTA output type in the delivery output header, the Transfer Order is automatically created.
    The problem I'm running into now is the configuration setting that controls this.  I thought I figured it out when going to this IMG path:
    SAP Customizing Implementation Guide  -->  Logistics Execution -->  Shipping -->  Basic Shipping Functions  -->  Output Control -->  Define Print Parameters Shipping
    When selecting the Delivery Note, the shipping point I was using was not configured in this location.  I added the shipping point into this transaction, saved, and created a new order & delivery.  However, the WMTA output type still was not automatically inserted into the delivery when saving.  Is there another location I should be looking to fix this so that when I enter an order with a particular Shipping Point, the WMTA output type automatically appears in the delivery?

  • Print a "Pull Sheet" or "Pick List" when Transfer Order Created

    How do I automatically print a "Pull Sheet" or "Pick List" upon creating a transfer order?
    Is this the same thing as going into LT31?

    Production Schedulling Profile - WM request are set to TR & TO automatically created on Release
    Goto IMG
    gotot Production >>> shop floor control>> Master data >> define Production scheduling profile.
    We can see screen
    we can define
    in transport
    WM request
    options available
      No creation of transfer requirements on order release
    X  Only creation of transfer requirements on release
    1  Transfer requirement and transfer order on release
    Please tell me if u face any problem
    Sunil Singh

  • Multiple Picking location for a Shipping point

    Hi,
    Is it possible to assign mutiple picking location against a shipping point in one plant.
    Currently we can assign only one storage location as picking location against a shipping point in the below bath
    SPRO->LE->Shipping->Picking->Determine picking location->Assign picking location
    I have mutiple storage location for a single shipping point. I want  system to check any one of the storage location while creating delivery for that particular shipping point.
    Eg:
    Plant P1 have storage locations S1,S2,S3,S4 & shipping Point SH1,SH2.
    System has to determine picking location as S1 or S2 for shippint point SH1.
    Is it possible to control this by any userexit or anyother way?
    This has to be applicable for STO/PO also.
    Thanks

    Hello,
    there is user-exit:
    "Determinations in the Delivery
    You can use the following enhancements to control determination of the organizational units that control the picking or putaway process of deliveries:
    Enhancement Function influenced
    V02V0002 Storage location determination
    V02V0003 Gate and staging zone determination (Header)
    V02V0004 Staging zone determination (item)"
    SPRO: Logistics Execution>Shipping>System Modifications-->Previous User Exits in Shipping
    Line: -
    You can also use Business Add-In for Delivery Processing:
    Business Add-In for Delivery Processing
    Use
    Application component: LE-SHP-DL
    You can use the Business Add-In LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC to influence processing of delivery data, during creation and changing of deliveries at specific points described in the interface. The BAdI methods enable you to read, write, determine, delete, and save your own delivery-related data, and to change the standard delivery data.
    SPRO: Logistics Execution>Shipping>System Modifications-->Business Add-Ins in Shipping
    -->Business Add-In for Delivery Processing
    Andrzej

  • Process Order creates Multiple Inspection for Same Batch

    Hi Guys,
    Expert opinion is needed to have this issue fixed.
    Issue:When a new Process Order is created it automatically creates in storage location A.  There are times when a process order needs to be created into another storage location B.  When the Process Order is created and then is changed from A to B  it will  create two inspection lots for one batch, one for each storage location.  From the plant perspective they only need one Inspection lot as they will not create two set of samples for testing since it is the same batch it just went into a different storage location then it was originally created for.  Is there a way to change SAP  so that it only creates one Inspection lot per batch.
    Control InspLot field in QM view for Insp Type 04 is X
    We had different scenarios with same Batch
    SCENARIO #1:  Sloc is changed to B prior to Release, in CRTD status of order Sloc was A
    So there are 2 Insp. Lot created one for A & another for B after GR in Sloc B
    SCENARIO #2:  Sloc is changed to B after  Release
    IL is created after Release of order with Sloc A, after changing Sloc B in process order and performing GR, new IL is created for Sloc B
    Business scenario is certain times of the year where one creates a PO with one Sloc and then it needs to be GR into a different Sloc.
    They are generating a lot of IL’s that are not used and it seems like every year they need to get UD’s made on IL’s for finance to close out the year which is cumbersome.
    Please suggest way out, objective is one process should have one IL per Batch irrespective of Sloc
    Regards
    Nitin Desai

    There are several things that come to mind.
    First and foremost, get the planning right so that the process orders are created properly the first time around.  This is a business issue.  Yes.. I don't know your business.. no, you really aren't all that different then the thousands of other businesses using SAP.  The root cause of this is you don't know what is going where when you order it or in the case of process orders, where you intend to make it or store it.  That's a basic planning problem.
    2 - you must have early lot creation turned on, "Y".  You can't be using "X".  X would only create an 04 lot when you do the GR so if you change the storage location prior to the Process order being released I'm not sure how you are generating two lots.  Are you sure all the lots in question are 04 lots? Are you maybe seeing an 03 lot?  Or possibly an 08 lot?  Something doesn't sound right here.
    3 - If you receive into two storage locations from one process order, you will get two inspection lots.  No way around this.  There is stock associated with these.  You could use customization to suppress the second receipt but that stock would go right to UR with no inspection.
    4. Don't change the storage locations  in the process orders at all.  You can use the stock posting screen in the UD and change the storage location when you make the UD.
    5.  Another option is to again, don't change the storage location in the PO but use QAC2 transaction to transfer the inspection lot into the proper storage location.
    You need to explain your scenarios better cause I really don't see how you are getting the two lots when you make all your changes in the process order prior to releasing the process order.  That doesn't make any sense at all.
    Craig

  • Transfer order choosing bin automatically for you

    We are facing an issue and hoping somebody can help me with this
    I moved an order for order to order using 413E mvt. in MIGO. 
    Once this step is complete and saved, the normal procedure takes you to LT06 of WM which enables you to put away into bin.  This step is not working properly...................and choosing the bin for you in the background..................being incorrect.
    I just nned to know as soon as my document posted in MiGO system should automatically takes me to LT06 and when i enter my material doc, year and w/h number i should be able to select bin to move the goods to. Any help be appreciated.

    Hello,
    Check the following things in the below spro path
    Step 1: check the interfaces
    Logistics execution> Warehouse Management>Interfaces>Define Movement types>LE-WM Interface to Inventory Management
    In the above path for the movement type 413 inventory movement look at the warehouse inventory movement associated and also see if you have the TR creation "X" on the 9th column. if it is marked, that means you will have a transfer requirement generated after you do 413 through MIGO or any other alternate transaction.
    ***Note***
    with out TR LT06 transaction wont work, because when you do LT06 it will take you to transaction which will create a TO with ref to TR and the TR is created with ref to a Material Document.
    Step 2:
    Logistics execution> Warehouse Management>Activities>Transfers>Define Movement types
    Once you go into that screen select movement type 413 special stock indicator E and see  if you have the TO creation as "2" option on the right side, it should 2- preparation for screen- this will take you to LT06.
    Hope this will help resolve the issue

  • Trnsfr Rqmnt created via PP for discontinuation mateiral and follow up mat

    Hi,
    Production order was created and it has PN A which has been set for discontinuation (1) with follow up material B. The effective out date is in the future.
    When generating WM Picklist, TR was created for both parts and issued. On confirmation only the part marked with discontinuation was consumed.
    How can i not generated TR for the follow up part?
    Thanks
    Jithin

    In the production order components details, there is a column for Discontinuation of the components.
    If you do not want the TR to be generated for follow up material, then in the material master(MRP 4) view of the parent component remove the followup material first and then uncheck the Discontinuation column in the order.
    If you want to discontinue the parent component from now with a followup material put "5" into the column it.It also has a option of simple discontinuation as "1" where in TR for the followup material will not be generated.

  • How to create count() measure for certain set of records in BMM Layer

    Hello all.
    I have a logical table like this one (Table AAA)
    Table AAA
    <p>
    --------------------------+<p>
    |       *Key*            |    *Name* |   <p>
    --------------------------+<p>
    |    1-2EMHS9     | AAA      |<p>
    --------------------------+<p>
    | 1-2EMWMO      | BBB      |<p>
    --------------------------+<p>
    |         NULL       |     CCC   |<p>
    --------------------------+<p>
    I need to calculate count() of records where <b>Key is not NULL</b>. In this example, this field must return coun() = 2.
    I suppose, CASE operator may help me with that, but I do not know for sure how to do this.
    Thank you for help,
    Alex.

    Thank you.
    But I must concretise my issue.
    I need to calculate number of records (e.g. order_id) that sutisfy appropriate condition (one of columns (e.g. loy_member_id) is set to null).
    I created logical column, that returns order_id if condition (loy_member_id is null) is met.
    Look at my logical column:
    Q Orders (LPM) - must return number of orders where loyalty_member_id is null.
    It has an expression:
    CASE  WHEN  NOT "Foxtrot (my) replica"."Sales Orders".LOY_MEMBER_ID IS NULL  THEN "Foxtrot (my) replica"."Sales Orders".ORDER_ID ELSE  NULL  END
    So, this returns order_id I need.
    But the question is how to count number of <b>order_id</b>'s returned by this column on BMM Layer.
    When I define my column with next expression:
    *<u>COUNT</u>(CASE WHEN NOT "Foxtrot (my) replica"."Sales Orders".LOY_MEMBER_ID IS NULL THEN "Foxtrot (my) replica"."Sales Orders".ORDER_ID ELSE NULL END)*
    I receive error:
    +[38083] The Attribute 'Q Orders LPM' defines a measure using an obsolete method.+
    Thank you,
    Alex.
    Edited by: Alex B on 3/3/2009 19:59

  • Restrict the system to create the delivery for certain quantity

    Dear All,
            Can we able to restrict the system for the creation of delivery for some quantity.
    For example
        We have created the sales order for  100 quantity.
    Now we want that at the time of delivery creation system must restrict to some quantity (say only 5 qty not more than that)
    looking for your reply.
    Regards
    Pawan

    Hi,
    Can please checkout through the following areas-
    1. In sales order at item level maintain underdelivery tolerance as 95% of 100 qty.
    2. Check in material master of sales view i think some functionality but its work all the materials not for particular sales order.
    3. Write the code in exit V50STAT at the delivery creation for quantities.
    Rewards if it helps
    Regards
    Goutham

Maybe you are looking for

  • Video out from the headphone jack died... 30gb 5g

    Hi all. So, I have a 30gb 5g ipod. I have played video out of the headphone jack to a tv for years now. I have the apple version of the video out cable. So, recently, the video stopped playing. The audio plays. YES, it is set to tv out = on, NTSC. Th

  • Performance issue with high CPU and IO

    Hi guys, I am encountering huge user response time on a production system and I don’t know how to solve it. Doing some extra tests and using the instrumentation that we have in the code we concluded that the DB is the bottleneck. We generated some AW

  • HttpRequestHandler.run Exception: java.lang.IllegalStateException

    Hi, I am writing a JSF Page template that contains username and password, and using that template in the LoginPage.jspx. Whenever the login page opens, I am getting the below mentioned exception. WARNING: The application: current-workspace-app threw

  • How System Command can replace a file in Application Server

    Hi Guys,               A new system Command is created. When that system command is executed, the client wants to take a file from one directory in application server and put that file into another directory on the application server itself. How this

  • Won't install! ERROR: 2738

    Help! I have tried upgrading my itunes several times now and everytime I get the following message: "The installer has encountered an unexpected error installing this package. This may indicate a problem with this package. The error is 2738." I have