Authorisation Check during CO-Retraction

Hi,
I am retracting CO-Data (CCA and OPA) from BW-BPS to CO. All went well until hierarchy-authorisations for InfoObject 0COSTCENTER have been activated on the planning-cube.
In the planning level/package the selection for InfoObject 0COSTCENTER is 1-ZZZZZZZZZZ.
This value will be delivered for authorisation check during CO-retraction.
When checking hierarchy-authorisations, the explicite value ':' for 0COSTCENTER is expected. So I changed the selection in the planning area to 1-9999999999, ':' and A-ZZZZZZZZZZ.
But the value ':' will be deletet during the preparation for the value check (RSSB_AUTHORITY_VAR_CHECK). So the hierarchy-check does not work properly.
Please give me any advise, how to make authorisation check possible.
Greetings Andreas

Hello Andreas,
as always the BPS selection needs to be a subset of your authorizations. You seem to select all cost centers so a hierarchy authorization is not enough.
- Do an authorization trace in RSSM and check the log
- Adapt the BPS selections or use a BPS authorization variable
Regards,
Marc
SAP NetWeaver RIG

Similar Messages

Check during Excise Invoice J1IIN

Check during Excise Invoice J1IIN
While using J1IIN transaction for excise i want to check the posting date entered by the user with the
actual GI date during PGI ... so i try to find badi or user exit called when we click form billing and enter billing doc and posting date in J1IIN transaction , but i could not find any enhancement , please suggest me any badi/userexit or what shud i do apply this check.
The check is that excise posting date shud note be greater than actual PGI date .
Ankesh

Hi Ankesh,
You can use this function module - J_1I7_USEREXIT_EXCISE_BEF_SAVE

The user name or password is incorrect in the CRM system checks during installation

Hi everyone
I'm installing CRM 2013 on 2 servers (server 2012) - CRM Full server + SQL Server 2012.
I created 2 service accounts for this - CRMSVC + CRMSANDBOX (one for sandbox and another one for all the rest).
I'm getting the following error in the system checks during setup:
I've verified a billion times that the service accounts and passwords are valid - I even tried using different service accounts - same problem. As for now I also added the service accounts to the local admins groups just to be sure that it's not some permissions
issue (I also added them to the 'log on as service' & performance logs groups).
If i try to use NETWORK SERVICES instead of a service account - the installation goes through flawlessly - no issues at all.
I'm also gonna say that i tried another installation on a fresh server - SAME ISSUE.
So for now my ideas are either it's a GPO somehow blocking the service accounts - or some kind of other security issue.
I also found out that the security event log shows these two errors when these show up in the system checks:
Inside i found 'NULL SID' entry - it does not recognize the service accounts account and 0xC0000064 in the Sub
Status Codes
It's not a typo issue so don't bother - if i write a wrong password in purpose - it actually says that the password i typed for domain\service account is incorrect - here it seems that the service account is not being recognized.
Any ideas anyone?
Thanks
Please vote if you find my post helpful - Thanks

Not sure you understood my point.
The installation process necessarily runs under the account of the installing user. The installation will query AD to identify information about the service accounts, and will add them to the relevant CRM AD groups. It is possible that the installing user
account does not have sufficient privileges on the AD objects for the service accounts to be able to identify them, and to add them to groups. This scenario is consistent with the errors that you get, and also with being able to install CRM to run under NetworkServices
(which doesn't have its own AD object)
Microsoft CRM MVP - http://mscrmuk.blogspot.com/ http://www.excitation.co.uk
Hi David
I understand this, but as far as i know running it under NETWORK SERVICES will add the machine names to the OU security groups - hence the user installing still needs to have delegated permissions on that OU. Anyway as mentioned above - ignoring the checks
and running the installation solved this and also added the accounts to the security groups - so this whole mess looks like some bug to me - not sure i will ever find out what it was :)
Please vote if you find my post helpful - Thanks

Sales BOM - Delivery Quantity check during post goods issue

I am working on a problem in my company. We are running ECC6.0 ehp 4. We are using standard ERLA functionality with sales bom (5) for product kits. Delivery manager has requested that we investigate a system check during delivery post goods issue. THe problem is that when shipper processes delivery, if they have to backorder they update pick and delivery quanity on the TAE item. They should also update TAQ delivery quantity, so that backorder amount is correct. If they make data entry error, backorder quantity is incorrect. The delivery manager has tried a number of attempts to re-train and correct mistakes. He is now asking that SAP issue a hard error if TAQ and TAE delivery item quantities are not the same.
I have searched on SAP Notes, Forms, and Google and do not see solution. I know that at delviery item category there is a minimum qty check for the item category. I've not found a user exit or configuration point that checks quanities. Does anyone know of out of the box solution? Or where would I put in custom user exit?
Test Case
Create Standard Order
Enter Material with Sales BOM
ITEM A     Qty 10
BOM explodes with Item categories
ITEM A     TAQ parent
ITEM B     TAE child
Create Delivery
Delivery has item categories TAQ and TAE
TAE is pickable, TAQ no pick
Process TAE
     Pick quantity of 5 items
     Change delivery quantity to 5 items
     Forget to change TAQ delivery quantity
     Pack 5 items
Post Goods Issue the delivery.
Is there are requirement/routine than can be run at time of PGI that checks TAQ delivery quantity is the same as TAE delivery quantity. If quanities are not the same, show hard error and message do not allow PGI to complete.
Thank you
Tony Romain

I tried setting that field in the sale order this morning. By defaulting it to "C"; I was able to get warning message for TAE line. I was able to post goods with TAE and TAQ, being different quantities. I need the check to determine if TAE and TAQ delivery quantity are different. Using this fields seems to be line specific. Thanks for the suggestion. I now know what that field does to the delivery.
I rewarded points.
Thanks,
Tony

Hard Check During Delivery Creation

Hello Experts,
Need your advice. I am stuck up in a enhancement issue during delivery creation. i am working for passenger vehicle company.
Back ground Info.
the company procures chassis from vendor & builds bus body over it. there are various types of chassis & each is uniquely identified in SAP by Material No. & also mentioned in BOM created for bus. when chassis is received , equipment is created using T-code IE01. After this one more equipment is created for bus which is called BBD Serial No. The equipment for BBD serial no holds chassis serial no. My issue is at the time of creation of delivery using T-code VL01N the user puts the BBD Serial No manually in a dialog box provided, This BBD Serial No is not capturing in the importing structure IT_XLIPS of BADI "LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC" Method "Delivery_Final_Check".
I have to put a check during delivery creation for consumption of Chassis , if the Chassis is consumed during production phase a Mat Doc will be generated with movement Type 261. As such we don't knew the Mat Doc for Chassis Serial no Consumed during prod phase. so to derive chassis no in the BADI against which we have to check for it's consumption. The user provide BBD Serial no in a standard dialog box in VL01N.
Can we use Field Exit for this or any other BADI Should work.
Best Regards
Priyesh Shah

Hi Priyesh,
Below steps may help you to get the value of the standard dialog box provided in the screen.
1. Find the field name of the standard dialog box provided in the the screen for BBD Serial no.
2. Implement below code in the BAdI "LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC" method.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <fs> TYPE BBDFIELDTYPE.
ASSIGN ('(SAPMV50A)BBDFIELDNAME') TO <fs>.
Now the field symbol <fs> will hold the value passed in the dialog box.
Please try and let me know if it is working or not.
Thanks
Gangadhar

HCM P&F: No check during send step

Hi,
I am working with HCM P&F on EhP3 and facing the following problem with checks during the send step of my form, standard process HR_PA_XX_TRANSFER_2:
1) Lets assume that I want to change PERNR 007. I open the form and press "Check and Send". At the same time somebody else is working on PERNR 007 via transaction PA30. I get an error message that "Personnel number 007 could not be locked. Person is already being processed by Dr. No". I am not getting forward in the process and the step remains "Check and Send". This is correct and the way I expect it to work.
2) Now let assume again that I want to change PERNR 007. I open the form and press "Check and Send". Nobody is working on PERNR 007 and the process is moved to step "Send". Now somebody opens PERNR 007 via transaction PA30. I press "Send" and I get a message that the "process was successfully completed". However, looking into the backend no changes have been made and in the application I see .... "Personnel number 007 could not be locked. Person is already being processed by Dr. No". The problem is that the process has been completed and I can therefore not reprocess it!
Does anybody understand the logic behind this? Any solution to the problem? Is it because there is a missing lock after pressing "Check and Send" or is it a missing check during the "Send" step?
Thanks.

Ensure that the program exit CL_HRASR00_POBJ_WF_EXIT is maintained correctly at each interactive workflow task.
If the issue persist please describe the configuration with screenshots.
Regards.

How to put Authorisation Check?

Hi,
I have built a Module Program. In this there is a Save Button where information in the screen is saved to a Z table.
I need to put an Authorisation check to this save button. That is only users who have Save capability could save.
Simply there should be an authorisation check before the Save where it will check if the User has the Save option.
Please guide me on how to do this.
Thanks,
Kishan

Hi Kishan,
1. AUTHORITY-CHECK
   The above statement is required for authority checking.
    Just see help on it for syntax purpose.
2. Moreover,
   u will also have to know which authorisation object
   is necessary for your purpose.
   (or else new authorisation object may need tobe created)
Hope the above helps.
Regards,
Amit M.

Authorisation check in report

Hi ,
we have developed a z report which is fetching grade from infotype 8 .All the users here dont have authorisation for infotype 8.Is it possible somehow that the users who don have authorisation for infotype 8 can rum that report.Right now when they are trying to run the report its showing 'No Authorisation for infotype 8'.Or is there some other place from which grade can be retrieved .
Regards
Saurabh

Create an authorisation object (SU21)
Put an authorisation check for this object in your report (AUTHORITY-CHECK)
Create a role that contains this object (PFCG)
Assign this role to all the users who require access to the report (SU01).
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Feb 27, 2008 2:07 PM

Existence check during archiving : AM_ASSET

According to the job network graphic of archiving object 'AM_ASSET', PS_PROJECT is prerequisite.
Could anybody tell me what is checked during writing program/deletion program of AM_ASSET?
For example, existence check of related PROJECT is done during deletion program .. and so on.
Thank you
Yuko

Thanks Srinivasa,
I tried change the profit centere to optional still i get the same error. (Note : In the performance screen (error msg scree) There is a customizing link when i click it, It takes me to the following IMG menu:
Financial accounting new .-> GL New-> Business Transactions ---> Document splitting -
> Define document splitting charaterstics for general ledger accounting.
But i am not sure what configuration i should do over there. (Note: it already has field profit center and segment .there is a tick mark for zero balance and mandatory field against profit center. Nothing is checked for segment.) Hope this input will be of some help.
Please let me know if you need any additional information
Regards
Naveen

Availability check during Shipping

Hi,
I want input regarding availability check during shipping.
It's a make to order scenario & I want to know whether availability check is really required during shipping for checking the sales order stock or it can be managed without availability check.
The reason, why I want to avoid availability check is because the quantity of production order is very small say 10 ton of concrete p day. I require a proper logics to convince my client.
Please share your valuable inputs.
Regards
Suman

Dear Suman
Whatever be the production order quantity, it makes sense to carry out an availability check in the delivery for the following reasons.
If you do not carry out an availability check for particular materials in the sales order, you should definitely check whether the order quantity is available and can be delivered when you create the delivery. Even if you have checked the availability situation in the order, it makes sense to check it once again in the delivery.
The availability check is calculated using planned inward and outward movements of goods. Therefore the delivery situation might have changed in the meantime due to unforeseen circumstances, such as lost output. The availability check in the delivery takes any such changes into account.
Thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Skipping Authorisation checks in LDB

Hi All,
I am working on HR module and I have got to work on a report which is using LDB (Logical DataBase).LDB will do authorisation checks by default.
1) My requirement is to skip the authorisation checks and allow all the data to be retrieved.
Can this be done by calling any standard FM ? If yes , please name it.
regards,
PP

//LDB will do authorisation checks by default.
in my opinion you are looking for a data retrieval process from report development point of view.
Ok say you are pulling data from infotype -08 which is sensitive information. now you need a entry for the object of this and then you are allowed to select on this table.
keep an authority-check on this table pa0008 and if you have the access then you will proceed or else dont pull the records.
Authority-object / Authority -check from program perspective will do .
ex:
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'Z_TCODE'
ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '03' " read access
ID 'ZTCODE' FIELD p_tcode. " actual value
IF sy-subrc EQ 0. " check authorization
* fetch record
SELECT SINGLE *
FROM tstc
INTO wa_tstc
WHERE tcode EQ p_tcode.
Br,
Vijay.

User authorisation check in ABAP-HR program

Hi,
Can anyone please help me on the following query ?
I need to check user authorisation in an ABAP report at Object level, filter only relevant records based on the user's authorisation and display appropriate messages.
The above mentioned report is purely developed by us and is not a copy of any standard report. Hence, kindly help me with your suggestions and opinions.
Thanks and Regards,
Manas Menon

Create an authorisation object (SU21)
Put an authorisation check for this object in your report (AUTHORITY-CHECK)
Create a role that contains this object (PFCG)
Assign this role to all the users who require access to the report (SU01).
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Feb 27, 2008 2:07 PM

Availability check during goods issue

Dear All
We have a scenerio where SAP change the GI quantity during GI posting . Even though quantity is confirmed in SO and delivery .
we are not having WM , picking and packing happen in external WH .
Please let me know any setting in customizing which force system to do availability check during GI again , as availability check is already done during SO and delivery creation .
Many Thanks
Kaustubh

Hi,
When you do PGI, you can't issue stock that you don't have (in that SL/Plant). ATP can be done in some cases without SL, and that could lead to such problems.
Alternatively (not recommended!) you can allow negative stocks, so PGI goes through with any quantity, and you reconcile stocks later.
Regards,
Mario

Price check during subsequent debit & credit

Hi experts,
My client wants a scenario which is enumerated below.
The client requirement is to have a tolerance level check during miro as well as subsequent debit & credit.
For the miro i have taken tolerance key PP: price variance with error message 083 & it is working fine for percenatge toleranace check i.e if the PO is made for 10 rs/unit & i have set upper & lower limit of tolerance of 10% system will not allow to do miro at price of more than 11 rs/unit or less than 9 rs/unit.
The problem i am facing is to activate the same check at the time of subsequent debit & credit i.e if somebody does a miro of 10 rs/unit & then does a subsequent debit to pay another 2 rs to the vendor the system is not giving an error message but actually the vendor is getting 12 rs/unit which is against norm. How do we check this thing so that system does not allow the same.
waiting for reply.

Hi all,
There is a new development. The error message is getting triggered for subsequent debit. That means if i have set a tolerance level of 10%,& initially received the invoice at a 10 rs/unit which is the PO price then system will not allow to do a subsequent debit for another 2 rs/unit ( by effectively making the price 12 rs/unit) as it falls outside the tolerance limit by throwing an error message.
But same error message is not getting effected for subsequent credit i.e after receiving the invoice for 10 rs/unit if i do a subsequent credit for 2 rs/unit then it is falling outside set tolearnce limit of +-10% ( by effectively making the price 8 rs/unit) but the system is not triggering any message.
Any idea whether it is a SAP default, that the message determination will trigger only for subsequent debit & not for subsequent credit.
waitng for reply.

Availability check during reservation - MM

Hi Gurus,
We need to do availability check during the creation of reservation. The check to be made is like this,
The reservation quantity should be lesser or equal to sum of unrestricted stock plus all other open reservations.
If the above condition fails, issue an error message and not allow to create reservation.
I did create new checking rule, checking group and checked the required (may be missing something here) objects to be checked in config, but I still able to create reservation. No error message is displayed.
Gurus, could you send me a step by step for availability check? Also, need to issue a custom error message.
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Sundar.

Hi
Go to transaction OMB1, there you will four options;
1. Movement Type
2. Checking Rule
3. Define Checking Rule
4. Transaction Code
Go to Movement Type & put Dynamic Availabilty Check either "B" or "F" against the movement type you want.
& accordingly go to checking rule & then go to Define Checking Rule of yours.
& then go to Transaction Code & the created Checking Rule to the Transaction Code MB21 & MB22.
Hope this solves your problem.
Reward points if useful.
Regards
Irfan

Authorisation Check during CO-Retraction

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for