Authorisation check for single status

hi all
i have a requirement which is like i have to maintain authorisation for single user status.right now we are able to do that for multiple statuses only,
if i say i want to aply check for a single status like open only,how can i achieve that if possible.
help will be appreciated
best regards
ashish

Ashish,
How are u doing that check for multiple status?
where ru doing it?
can u give some more details?
Robin

Similar Messages

  • Authorisation check for Object F_BL_BANK using transaction F110

    Hi
    Can you help me with transaction F110. The object F_BL_BANK has been linked on SU24 to transaction F110.  It has also been set for Check/maintain.
    There is no authorisation check for this object using F110.
    How can we resolve the issue.

    Hi
    We are on 4.6
    I linked the object but the program is not doing an authority check The F_BL_BANK object has the following linked to it
    .  .     .  Check          F_BKPF_BUP Accounting Document: Authorization for Posting Periods   
    .  .  .     Check/maintain F_BL_BANK  Authorization for House Banks and Payment Methods        
    .  .     .  Check          F_KNA1_APP Customer: Application Authorization                      
    .  .     .  Check          F_KNA1_BED Customer: Account Authorization                          
    .  .     .  Check          F_KNA1_BUK Customer: Authorization for Company Codes                
    .  .     .  Check          F_KNA1_GEN Customer: Central Data                                   
    .  .     .  Check          F_KNA1_GRP Customer: Account Group Authorization                    
    .  .     .  Check          F_LFA1_APP Vendor: Application Authorization                        
    .  .     .  Check          F_LFA1_BEK Vendor: Account Authorization                            
    .  .     .  Check          F_LFA1_BUK Vendor: Authorization for Company Codes                  
    .  .     .  Check          F_LFA1_GEN Vendor: Central Data                                     
    .  .     .  Check          F_LFA1_GRP Vendor: Account Group Authorization                      
    .  .     .  Check          F_PAYR_BUK Check Management: Action Authorization for Company Codes 
    .  .  .     Check/maintain F_REGU_BUK Automatic Payment: Activity Authorization for Company Code
    .  .  .     Check/maintain F_REGU_KOA Automatic Payment: Activity Authorization for Account Type
    .  .     .  Check          PLOG       Personnel Planning                                       
    .  .     .  Check          P_ABAP     HR: Reporting                                            
    Ther are more objects but these are the key ones The object also has a custom object in that was build by SAP called ZLSCH      Payment method  We want the system to do a check on the payment method

  • Check for MPL status

    Hi. Is there an easy way to check if MPL is currently up or down? Is there a table in the database that can tell this status?
    We have a file upload process that are automatically picked up by MPL and loaded in staging tables.
    Thank you.

    I am looking for this information as well, and spl.sh -m isup doesn't work. At least not on Red Hat Linux. This is the output I see here:
    *$ spl.sh -m isup*
    *111026.11:24:12 <info> Startup/Shutdown logs will go to /spl/CCB231DEV/logs/system/spl.sh.log*
    *$*
    And the log basically parrots that same info. Any idea on a way to check in this case? I want to be notified if the service drops for any reason, and either attempt to restart it automatically or manually.

  • Enhancement CNEX0002 - EXIT_SAPLCNAU_002  PS Authorisation check for WBS

    I would like to use the enhancement to allow only certain users access to change certain fields in CJ02 / CJ20N.  Other users must still be able to change other data on a WBS element.
    We created our own authorisation object which is checked in the exit.  When we activate the customer enhancement project, the WBS are greyed out and nothing can be changed (even if you have the authorisation).
    Does anyone have any knowledge of whether this function module can be used to limit authorisation to change certain fields only?
    Thanks in advance
    Silke

    Thanks Gupta,
    I managed to get it working for project definitions and wbs elements - for the whole transaction and for certain fields only as well - the only field we still battle with is the 'short description' of the wbs where we want to avoid unauthorised changes by just any user. SAP is also battling with this one and thus far we had no correct answer from them.

  • Authorisation check for Functional Location Category

    Hi All,
    Does anyone know of an authorisation object which can be checked to restrict which Functional Location Categories a user can create/change (IL01, IL02)?
    Thanks,
    Richard

    hi
    i think it will serve the pupose while changing the object ,if you want to prevent for creating you can simply delete IL01 t code to the user using I_TCODE object .
    regards
    thyagarajan
    you can also check INST_AUTHORITY_CHECK PM/CS Enhanced Authorization Checks this badi for your need
    Edited by: thyagarajan krishnamurthy on May 14, 2009 7:01 PM

  • Authorisation check in report

    Hi ,
    we have developed a z report which is fetching grade from infotype 8 .All the users here dont have authorisation for infotype 8.Is it possible somehow that the users who don have authorisation for infotype 8 can rum that report.Right now when they are trying to run the report its showing 'No Authorisation for infotype 8'.Or is there some other place from which grade can be retrieved .
    Regards
    Saurabh

    Create an authorisation object (SU21)
    Put an authorisation check for this object in your report (AUTHORITY-CHECK)
    Create a role that contains this object (PFCG)
    Assign this role to all the users who require access to the report (SU01).
    <REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
    Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Feb 27, 2008 2:07 PM

  • User authorisation check in ABAP-HR program

    Hi,
    Can anyone please help me on the following query ?
    I need to check user authorisation in an ABAP report at Object level, filter only relevant records based on the user's authorisation and display appropriate messages.
    The above mentioned report is purely developed by us and is not a copy of any standard report. Hence, kindly help me with your suggestions and opinions.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Manas Menon

    Create an authorisation object (SU21)
    Put an authorisation check for this object in your report (AUTHORITY-CHECK)
    Create a role that contains this object (PFCG)
    Assign this role to all the users who require access to the report (SU01).
    <REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
    Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Feb 27, 2008 2:07 PM

  • GRC AC 10- Multiple detour for single stage path

    Hi Experts,
    I wanted to know about a possibility or view. Do you know anyway where we can have multiple detour activated(like first detour 1 then detour 2 check) for single stage.
    Actually once we click on routing rule, we get only select single detour selection option.
    Please suggest idea.
    (I would like to update that we do not want system to have multiple level of approver but only single role owner stage).
    Final solution is creating custom detour having ability to handle multiple scenario but we are looking for no custom initiator)
    Regards,
    Nishant

    Hi Nis,
    unfortunately in standard solution only one detour path can be added to single stage.
    When we had such a challenge, like you described, we simply used custom initiator and this is truly the best option to go.
    In our case we wanted to have different path (detour) for roles with special attribute an in the same time different path in case sod issue occurs. In other words we wanted to have 2 detours condition on one stage like you want to have. The option that suites our needs in the best way was to have custom initiator rule.
    Filip

  • OSA - Authorisation Checks

    Hi all:
    In my client's appraisal form, only the employee can fill in the form. They will also have to specify their manager's name as the appraiser.
    I tried to use "Default Manager" BADI for my appraisal form. However, this is not a complete functionality because the appraisee can simply change the appraiser's name, after system defaults. There is no control on the appraiser chosen. I can even choose my subordinate as my appraiser, which is not correct.
    I know that in "Processing" tab, we can de-select "No Authorisation Check for Appraiser". This feature will check if the user (in my case, the appraisee) has authorisation for the appraiser etc. A few questions I would like to find out:
    1) Will this functionality meet my requirement?
    2) To use this functionality, do I need structural authorisation or just non-structural authorisation?
    3) Should i use BADI "Authority Check" instead, to cater to my requirement?
    Many thanks for your advice in advance.
    Thank you,
    Ash

    What is an authorisation checks?
    To ensure that a user has the appropriate authorizations when he or she performs an action, users are subject to authorization checks.
    The following actions are subject to authorization checks that are performed before the start of a program or table maintenance and which the SAP applications cannot avoid:
    ·        Starting SAP transactions (authorization object S_TCODE)
    ·        Starting reports (authorization object S_PROGRAM)
    ·        Calling RFC function modules (authorization object S_RFC)
    ·        Table maintenance with generic tools (S_TABU_DIS)
    How do we provide a basic authorisation check read for a employee? Could anyone help me with the path?
    Go to transaction PFCG and provide the role based authorization.

  • TF244069: An error occurred while checking the provisioning status of the reporting database schema for a PWA instance.

    The command TfsAdmin ProjectServer /RegisterPWA causes next error:
    TF244069: An error occurred while checking the provisioning status of the reporting database schema for a PWA instance.
    Project Server returned the following error: "Server was unable to process request. ---> The request failed with HTTP status 401: Unauthorized.".
     (type ProvisionException)
    Exception Stack Trace:    at Microsoft.TeamFoundation.Sync.Provisioning.ProvisionPwaDBSchema.HandleSoapException(SoapException soapException, String errorResourceString)
       at Microsoft.TeamFoundation.Sync.Provisioning.ProvisionPwaDBSchema.IsDBSchemaProvisioned()
       at Microsoft.TeamFoundation.Sync.Provisioning.ProvisionManager.Provision()
    I installed SharePoint 2013 and Project Server 2013 as farm and TFS 2012 and my account has permissions everywhere. I read article
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg412653.aspx and gave full permissions for TFS account to SQL and Project, Project app pool account to SQL, but still have an error.
    How can I find out what exactly permissions are not enough???

    The problem was in claims authentication. Changed to Windows and all worked out.

  • Reg:Single Check for Multiple Vendors

    Hi Experts,
    I want to Issue a Single check for all vendor open items...
    For this is I created one Group Key and assigned in the vendor master record, but while doing the payment separate check issuing for each vendor,
    any idea

    Hi,
    Can you check the below thread of urs.
    [Reg:Single Check for Multiple Vendors]
    In addition to the above, please make sure that in OBVU, the check box separate payment for each ref is deselected for your questioned comapny code.
    You would have continued your earlier thread instead, rather than a new thread.
    Thanks,
    Srinu

  • How to check the DTP status (i.e in active mode or not) for the Prior days.

    Hi SAP gurus,
    How to check the DTP status whether it was in active mode or inactive mode for the prior days ?

    Hi Aditya,
    Kindly have a look into below links,
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/00dbbfa9-dba2-2d10-bc80-9d6489e4b1c7?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
    DTP request Overall status
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Mani

  • Extended Program check for multipl programes in single run

    Hello All,
    I wan to do the syntax check for multiple programs at single execution run.
    SAP has provided SLIN transaction for single program, Is there any SAP standard transaction similar as SLIN for multiple program check at single execution run?
    Thanks,
    Feroz.

    >
    s feroz wrote:
    > I need it in R/34.6b version.
    I don't think you have much option there

  • Checking for status of a long-running BPEL process

    Hi experts,
    I have one BPEL process for originating customers' loan which usually involves various steps which takes around 15-20 mins to complete per instance. I would like to implement a user interface that can check the process's progress and display how it is going to the user.
    I have thought of using an asynchronous process that updates a global variable listing status of each step inside the process and use a poller to invoke another operation (like "checkStatus" operation) of this process to retrieve this variable and display the value to the users. It may be achieved by using "OnEvent" activity waiting for "checkStatus" operation. It will run in parallel with the main process, have access to the global variable and reply this variable immediately to the caller.
    It sounds like an idea in theory but invoking a web service operation for polling status is very heavy-weight and may impact performance during high-load.
    I am just wondering if there is other solution to this problem as I believe the status checking is a very common expected requirement in long-running BPEL process. What might be the best practice to implement this?
    Look forward to your responses.
    Thanks and regards,
    Edited by: Nghia Pham on Nov 5, 2012 4:48 PM

    Hi.
    I apologize for the slow reply. I am just back from overseas and did not have chance to go to the forum!
    Thank you a lot for your responses!
    The BAM looks like a suggested out-of-the-box solution. But it ties too much to Oracle API and will be hard to customise the way you want to interpret the status to end-users. If you want to display the process status with BAM in a web application interface, ADF is the only solution (please correct me if I am wrong). I would prefer a stand-alone, free of proprietary API solution so that we can build a screen that is technology-independent. As ADF UI is not our only supported view technology. For example, a PHP web client should be able to interpret the BPEL process status.
    Will really appreciate your suggested solution.
    Thanks and regards,

  • Performance check for status control table

    Hi,
    When ever we activate any ODS or delete the request ,a message 'Performance Check for Status control Table ' appears.
    What does it mean?Please explain what is status control table and how it performs?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Dinakar.

    Hi,
    This message is not a issue in itself. It is just a SAP message which means that the system is checking/updating the system tables to carry out the operation whether it can be done or not.
    If your loads are failing at this step or after this message there can be many reasons, check some of  the possible reasons below
    Performing check and potential update for status control table
    Update from PSA error in Process Chain
    problem in deleting request
    Reporting not available ,even if Data is sucessfully loaded into DT
    Hope this helps,
    Kush kashyap

Maybe you are looking for