Authorization does'nt work

Yesterday I downloaded some ebooks and got some ACSM-files. The old Version of Digital Editions 2.0 could'nt open them, so I downloaded the new version 4.0. But then I got the message "Error! Check activation". I deletet the authorization, but when I've start again I could'nt complete the authorization. I get a connection error. It says that there is no connection to the activation-server and that I have to check my internet connection. But there is nothing wrong.
I have already tried to disable the firewall or add the programm to the firewall programm. I checked my Adobe ID and password and I've run the programm as administrator. I have also uninstalled the programm and tried the old version 2.0 again. Nothing is working. PLEAS HELP!!!

Oh, nice try. It feels like I restarted my computer nearly a hundred times. Something else?

Similar Messages

Hierarchy Analysis Authorization does not work after transport

Hi Gurus,
I am facing a issue in hierarchy analysis authorization in quality system but the same authorization works perfectly fine in development.
All hierarchy authorizations works in Quality except for this one. I found one old sap note describing this as program error but this note is not applicable in BW 7.3.
I have checked the table RSECVAL, RSECHIER and authorization is active so everything looks good. Please advise if anyone faced this issue after transporting hierarchy auths to other systems
Regards,
Salman

Salman,
What I understood from your description is that you have same role+AA in Dev and QA, which provides access in Dev for all the nodes for said hierarchy but in QA, same role+AA provides access to the same hierarchy for all the nodes but one. Try to create a ZTEST analysis authorization in QA itself with access for the problematic hierarchy node and see if it works ? This will rule out the case if there is a difference in hierarchy in DEV & QA.
Regards,
Shivraj Singh

Authorization does not work

I need to configure my web application such that users from different groups/roles
have access to certain or all application uris. The way I am trying to achieve
this is by defining separate <security-constraint> for each type of role. Please
see the snippet from my web.xml below. I am using weblogic 7.0 service pack 2
and the web application is struts based. Also, I am using Form Based Authentication.

<security-constraint>
     <web-resource-collection>
          <web-resource-name>Operator Access</web-resource-name>
          <url-pattern>startOfDayStatus.do</url-pattern>
          <url-pattern>viewExceptionReport.do</url-pattern>
          <url-pattern>exceptionReport.do</url-pattern>
          <url-pattern>mqCheck.do</url-pattern>
          <url-pattern>dbCheck.do</url-pattern>
          <url-pattern>endOfDayReport.do</url-pattern>
          <http-method>GET</http-method>
          <http-method>POST</http-method>
     </web-resource-collection>
     <auth-constraint>
          <role-name>OPSGRPLOCAL</role-name>
     </auth-constraint>
     <user-data-constraint>
     <transport-guarantee>NONE</transport-guarantee>
     </user-data-constraint>
</security-constraint>
<security-constraint>
     <web-resource-collection>
          <web-resource-name>Admin and MKTOPS Access</web-resource-name>
          <url-pattern>*.do</url-pattern>
          <http-method>GET</http-method>
          <http-method>POST</http-method>
     </web-resource-collection>
     <auth-constraint>
          <role-name>THSMONGRP</role-name>
          <role-name>MKTOPSGRPLOCAL</role-name>
     </auth-constraint>
     <user-data-constraint>
     <transport-guarantee>NONE</transport-guarantee>
     </user-data-constraint>
</security-constraint>
As you would see, in the first security-constraint tag, I have allowed access
to only certain action uris for users belonging to OPSGRPLOCAL role. That works
fine. However, the second security-constraint does not behave as it is defined.
For any user belonging to the THSMONGRP and MKTOPSGRP does not even get authorized
and the user gets throws to the error page. Can anyone tell me if they have seen
such behviour when having configured multiple security-constraints?
Interesting thing I found is that if I deploy the application without defining
the first security-constraint tag but only have the second security-constraint
as shown above, all users belonging to those roles are authenticated as well as
authorized (the users do not get thrown to the error page). Has anyone experienced
such behaviour before?
One thing to note that, I have based the constraints on the same action uris and
not separated them into separate directories. Could this be the issue?
Anyway, I would appreciate if you could share your thoughts and experiences if
you have seen and/or resolved such problems before. Thank you for taking your
time.

Hi,
Probably an overlapping issue. As you suggest I would put them into different
subdirectories.
Kai
"Abhijit Joshi" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
I need to configure my web application such that users from different
groups/roles
have access to certain or all application uris. The way I am trying to
achieve
this is by defining separate <security-constraint> for each type of role.
Please
see the snippet from my web.xml below. I am using weblogic 7.0 service
pack 2
and the web application is struts based. Also, I am using Form Based
Authentication.

<security-constraint>
     <web-resource-collection>
          <web-resource-name>Operator Access</web-resource-name>
          <url-pattern>startOfDayStatus.do</url-pattern>
          <url-pattern>viewExceptionReport.do</url-pattern>
          <url-pattern>exceptionReport.do</url-pattern>
          <url-pattern>mqCheck.do</url-pattern>
          <url-pattern>dbCheck.do</url-pattern>
          <url-pattern>endOfDayReport.do</url-pattern>
          <http-method>GET</http-method>
          <http-method>POST</http-method>
     </web-resource-collection>
     <auth-constraint>
          <role-name>OPSGRPLOCAL</role-name>
     </auth-constraint>
     <user-data-constraint>
     <transport-guarantee>NONE</transport-guarantee>
     </user-data-constraint>
</security-constraint>
<security-constraint>
     <web-resource-collection>
          <web-resource-name>Admin and MKTOPS Access</web-resource-name>
          <url-pattern>*.do</url-pattern>
          <http-method>GET</http-method>
          <http-method>POST</http-method>
     </web-resource-collection>
     <auth-constraint>
          <role-name>THSMONGRP</role-name>
          <role-name>MKTOPSGRPLOCAL</role-name>
     </auth-constraint>
     <user-data-constraint>
     <transport-guarantee>NONE</transport-guarantee>
     </user-data-constraint>
</security-constraint>
As you would see, in the first security-constraint tag, I have allowed
access
to only certain action uris for users belonging to OPSGRPLOCAL role.
That works
fine. However, the second security-constraint does not behave as it is
defined.
For any user belonging to the THSMONGRP and MKTOPSGRP does not even get
authorized
and the user gets throws to the error page. Can anyone tell me if they
have seen
such behviour when having configured multiple security-constraints?
Interesting thing I found is that if I deploy the application without
defining
the first security-constraint tag but only have the second security-constraint
as shown above, all users belonging to those roles are authenticated
as well as
authorized (the users do not get thrown to the error page). Has anyone
experienced
such behaviour before?
One thing to note that, I have based the constraints on the same action
uris and
not separated them into separate directories. Could this be the issue?
Anyway, I would appreciate if you could share your thoughts and experiences
if
you have seen and/or resolved such problems before. Thank you for taking
your
time.

Custom login module Authentication works but Authorization Does not work

Hi:
I am using custom login module and switched on the ADF authentication using adf-config.xml file. My custom authentication works i.e. it returns true but when it finally tries to display the page 401 Unauthorized message is shown. I am using JDev 10.1.3.2.
Is there any other settings I need to perform. Could you please let me know.
Thanks

I have the same issue, please refer to this thread.
Re: ADF Security Authorization

Installing on Mac with OS 10.4. Internet authorization does not work. Telephone authorization does not work.

How do I install?

I have not tried it yet, but this web page appears to be the answer.
Error: Unable to Activate | Macromedia products

TS1389 I can't transfer purchase item,every time i tune asks me to authorize the PC and when i authorize, i tune says , this is one pc out of your 5 pc. I followed everty step mentioned in this article but still it does not work.

I can't transfer purchase item,every time i tune asks me to authorize the PC and when i authorize, i tune says , this is one pc out of your 5 pc. I followed everty step mentioned in this article but still it does not work

I am having the same problem for one song. I've tried deauthorizing and then authorizing the computer but it doesn't work. I can play the song on my iPhone and iPad but not my computer. Any help here would be greatly appreciated.

Flash player does not work under one user account.

Flash player does not work under one of my user accounts.
My system: I work with a mac mini with Mac OS X 10.6.8.
What I have done:
I installed the flash player maybe one year ago under my "first" user account. At that time this user account had had administrator authorization. In the meantime I had to change this "first" user account in an account without administrator authorization and created an administrator user with which I installed different programms. Lately, the message came up that it would be necessary to update the flash player. I did it; under the "first" user account, but of course with the administrator's password for installing. The installation had been "successful" - so I was told. But it did not run. I tried it again and again. Each time with "deinstallation" first. No way; it did not work.
After asking Adobe for the reason of the problem, they suggested to install the programm directly under the administrator user. I did that (of course after deinstalling under the "first" user account) with the result, that flash player runs under my administrator and my "second" user account, but not under the first user account. There I am always told to update my flash player.
With this result, I talked to Adobe. So they told me to contact the producer of the operating software, since this would be a mistake of the operating software.
And here I am - full of hope to get help from you.
Thanks for reading. And thanks in advance for helping me.
Nanny FS

Any update to provide at all here guys? Again, in my situation, it's very much rights-related as a standard user doesn't even report that the flash player exists when testing it on the Adobe Flash Version Detection website (despite it showing up in Control Panel and under Add/Remove Programs). I've already tried giving the C:\Windows\System32\Macromed and files/subfolders appropriate permissions for the standard user and still nothing. If I either give the user in question full local admin rights or logon as the domain admin, then the Adobe Flash Version Detection website says Flash is installed and Flash works fine.
Thoughts???

ITunes 9 Home Sharing does not work on Windows 7 x64

iTunes 9 Home Sharing does not work on Windows 7 x64.
Getting the following error message:
Home sharing could not be activated because this computer is not authorized for the account "iTunes account." Please authorize this computer and try again.
This is a bug since my computer is authorized in iTunes and there is only 2 computer authorized for my iTunes account, so I have 3 more left till I should get this message.
I've just upgraded my iPhone to OS 3.1 using it this morning.
Please advise.
Environment: Windows 7 x64, HP TouchSmart tx2-1020us Notebook
Ivan Farkas
<edited by host>

I am using Windows 7 x64.
I am running iTunes 9.0.2.25
I am running Mcafee.
I can see and play music from the iTunes installation on my Windows 7 machine, but I CANNOT access the library to copy songs from this computer to other computers on my network.
YES, I have enabled "Home Sharing" using my iTunes account. NO, I have not authorized more than 5 computers on this account.
I believe this to be a Windows 7 related issue, as Home Sharing worked as advertised when I was using Vista (before I upgraded to Windows 7).
I CAN set up Home Sharing on two other (host) computers in my home network and it works. These computers are XP and a MacBook Pro. I CANNOT access my Windows 7 machine x64 to COPY music from one autorized library to another. Please help!!!
P.S. - I have attempted to get this to work by turning OFF my McAfee firewall. Windows firewall is disabled.
Message was edited by: turcott

HT4623 my iphone doesn't work here in Albania after i made an update,it says that u have to change ur Sim Card cuz does not work with ur Carrier...what do i do?

Hpls help me ,my iphone does not work after i updated and restore it..it says that u have to change ur Sim Card..cuz the carrier that u use its not known
But it has worked perfectly before the update!

Your iPhone was almost certainly jailbroken to unlock it from the original carrier. Restoring the iPhone has now removed that jailbreak and the iPhone has relocked back to the original carrier. Only that carrier can authorize an official, permanent unlock, so you will need to contact that original carrier and ask if you would qualify for unlocking.
Regards.

Oracle dbms.set_role does not work in APEX application

Hi, in our j2ee applications, we use secure application role. Basically, the data source use the app user schema to connect to the database. the app user only has create session privileges. the database logon trigger will copy a set of attribute to the local secure context. (ip address, session user, client id, application name). The applications explicitly invoke the stored procedure sec_mgr.set_role before any DMLs are executed.
the sec_mgr.set_role will check the local context attribute , authorize the ip, application name, and set an appreciated role to this session based on session user.
we want to apply the same framework to the APEX application. First, we change the paring schema to the app schema which only has create session privilege. then we put the plsql code in which sec_mgr.set_role is called in the application builder --> shared components ---> edit security attribute ---> Virtual Private Database (VPD).
however, we got the error ORA-06565: cannot execute SET ROLE from within stored procedure
the sec_mgr.set_role is defined as invoker's right(AUTHID CURRENT_USER)
do i missing something in APEX to get it work?
Thanks

Please explain it does not work in APEX? Is the application updating tables that have a trigger? APEX does NOT override trigger actions. Is it possible the values your trigger is looking for are NOT available in your APEX application? Can you post the trigger code here for review?
Thank you,
Tony Miller
Webster, TX
What if you really were stalking a paranoid schizophrenic... Would they know?
If this question is answered, please mark the thread as closed and assign points where earned..

MAC Authentication does not work

My MAC Authentication does not work.
I have a ACS 3.0 server set. the MAC address is set in the user name field and in the password field.
I can ping the ACS, I can ping my AP, I can ping my client.
I don't want WEP and I don't want LEAP just MAC. So I set my authentication to "Open with MAC" My client has WEP set to NO WEP and authentication to OPEN
I have the latest drivers for both AP and my 350 Client.
I see that the client is associating and disassociating back and forth non stop. My AP log is full with the following message:
Station 0009.7c9f.xxxx Authentication failed
this is my config:
version 12.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
service password-encryption
hostname GOM_1200IOS
aaa new-model
aaa group server radius rad_eap
aaa group server radius rad_mac
server 10.1.2.197 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1812
aaa group server radius rad_acct
aaa group server radius rad_admin
aaa group server tacacs+ tac_admin
aaa group server radius rad_pmip
aaa group server radius dummy
aaa group server radius wlccp_rad_infra
aaa group server radius wlccp_rad_eap
aaa group server radius wlccp_rad_leap
aaa group server radius wlccp_rad_mac
aaa group server radius wlccp_rad_any
aaa group server radius wlccp_rad_acct
aaa authentication login eap_methods group rad_eap
aaa authentication login mac_methods local
aaa authentication login wlccp_infra group wlccp_rad_infra
aaa authentication login wlccp_eap_client group wlccp_rad_eap
aaa authentication login wlccp_leap_client group wlccp_rad_leap
aaa authentication login wlccp_mac_client group wlccp_rad_mac
aaa authentication login wlccp_any_client group wlccp_rad_any
aaa authorization exec default local
aaa authorization ipmobile default group rad_pmip
aaa accounting network acct_methods start-stop group rad_acct
aaa accounting network wlccp_acct_client start-stop group wlccp_rad_acct
aaa session-id common
enable secret xxxxxx
username Cisco password xxxx
ip subnet-zero
iapp standby timeout 5
bridge irb
interface Dot11Radio0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
encryption key 1 size 40bit 7 9DF1C10BF11A transmit-key
ssid GOM_1230
authentication open mac-address mac_methods
speed basic-1.0 basic-2.0 basic-5.5 basic-11.0
rts threshold 2312
channel 2462
station-role root
no cdp enable
dot1x reauth-period server
dot1x client-timeout 600
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control
bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source
no bridge-group 1 source-learning
no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
duplex auto
speed auto
no cdp enable
bridge-group 1
no bridge-group 1 source-learning
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
interface BVI1
ip address 172.16.43.45 255.255.240.0
no ip route-cache
ip default-gateway 172.16.47.254
ip http server
ip http help-path http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/prodconfig/help/eag/ivory/1100
ip radius source-interface BVI1
access-list 700 permit 000a.b74c.e8c9 0000.0000.0000
access-list 700 permit 0009.7c9f.d6e0 0000.0000.0000
access-list 700 permit 0006.25b1.2f79 0000.0000.0000
access-list 700 permit 000a.b78b.2d19 0000.0000.0000
access-list 700 permit 000b.5f6e.77c8 0000.0000.0000
access-list 700 deny 0000.0000.0000 ffff.ffff.ffff
access-list 701 deny 000b.5f6e.77c8 0000.0000.0000
access-list 701 permit 0000.0000.0000 ffff.ffff.ffff
no cdp run
snmp-server community GOM_AP1230 RO
snmp-server enable traps tty
radius-server local
group AP1230
user brazil nthash 7 1249523544595F517972017912677A3055325A25770B08770D5C5B4E4478087605 group AP1230
radius-server host 10.1.2.197 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1812 key 7 00233C2B
radius-server retransmit 3
radius-server attribute 32 include-in-access-req format %h
radius-server authorization permit missing Service-Type
radius-server vsa send accounting
bridge 1 route ip
line con 0
line vty 5 15
end
What is wrong?
Thanks very much for your help.

I figured out what was wrong so thank you for stopping by.
I will publish the config for other people to see.
Regards,

Create a page as a copy does not work properly

Hi,
When I create a new page as a copy of an existing page with page authorization set to some authorization scheme, the newly created page does not work. When I edit the page definition, "Authorization Scheme" is set to some random number instead of the scheme that was set in the original page and running the page throws an error. Any buttons or items set with an authorization also throws an error. Is this a bug?
Thanks,
Machaan

Hi Patrick,
I am using APEX version 4.0.1.00.03 on Oracle 11g.
I tried to reproduce it on apex.oracle.com and was not able to reproduce it. The new page worked fine.
In my application, the newly created page works fine and is not generating an error, but the authorization scheme is set to a number instead of a defined authorization scheme.
Thanks,
Machaan
Edited by: Machaan on Nov 12, 2010 2:07 PM

How can play Itune song when authoriaztion does not work?

after sharing Itune file, how can I play song when computer authorization process does not work?

Hi dewhi,
You can use the Adobe Cleaner Tool to uninstall CS6.
You can download the cleaner from : http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/cs5-cleaner-tool-installation-problems.html

ADE 2.0 funktioniert nicht mehr / ADE 2.0 does not work

Hallo zusammen!
Ich habe Anfang des Jahres ADE 2.0 installiert und e-Books damit gelesen, aber jetzt funktioniert das Programm nicht mehr.
Nach dem Start wird nur noch ein weißes Rechteck im Fenster angezeigt und sonst nichts mehr.
Habe schon alles neu installiert und als Administrator ausführen hilft auch nicht.
Hoffe jemand kann mir helfen!
Some month ago I installed ADE 2.0 and already read some ebooks with it, but now it does not work anymore.
After starting it there's only a white field in the window but nothing else.
Already reinstalled it and tried starting as admin but didn't help.
Hope somebody can help me!

There are lots of bugs in ADE2.0. Try replacing ADE2.0 with the older but more reliable v1.7.2.
(You can have them both installed at once if you like.)
Version 1.7.2, it is a little difficult to find, available on Adobe site for Windows and for Mac.
http://helpx.adobe.com/digital-editions/kb/cant-install-digital-editions.html
The forum software is sometimes corrupting the link above. There shouldn't be a blank in 'editio ns.html'. The following redirects to the same page: http://tinyurl.com/diged172
Make sure to authorize your 1.7.2 with the same userid you used before for V2.0

Only posted values for Navigation does not work

Hi,
I have a problem where all master data is shown in the input help for a variable, even when the setting for the info object is to show only posted values.
In a WEB template I have tree reports using tree different data providers. The setting in the web template is to show the same variable only once and that works. The setting of the info objects is to show only posted values. That does not work!
When using the input help for a variable, all master data shows, not only the poster values in the data providers.
When unchecking the setting Display Same Variable Only Once (MELT_VARBLES) the variables appears tree times each and the input help works as expected. It shows only posted values.
Any experience of this?
Best Regards
Kent

Hi Kent,
If you build several queries on different infoproviders, then put them into one web template or workbook. Variables from different queries with the same technical name will get merged in variable screen (Set parameter MERGE_VARIABLES=True in web template property. Set "Display Duplicated Variables Only Once" in workbook settings for variables).
This means, that it is not possible to decide which infoprovider the variable is based on. The provider is unknown to the system when doing F4 help so that D mode is not possible since D mode [Only Values in InfoProvider] is also infoprovider dependent. So only M mode ['Values in Master Data Table'] is possible.
In such merge variable situation, the authorizated values in F4 help is also retrieved without specific infoprovider.
Regards,
Nishant

Authorization does'nt work

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for