Automatic Creation of Settlement rule with the settlement type - AUC

We have a situation where I have created an Internal order for AUC. But unable to create the setlement rule automatically with the settlement type -AUC. Please guide us.

Hi,
This is possible through investment management module.
Define an investment profile using OITA and assign the asset class of AuC in investment profile. Assign investment profile to internal order master data.
AuC will be created on settlement automatically on settlement of inernal order when processing option "Automatic" is selected in KO88.
Regards
Chetan.

Similar Messages

Default settlement rule with settlement type as FUL for service orders

Hi Folks,
Could you please advise me on the below issue?
Requirement: setting up of default settlement rule with default settlement receiver as u201CCOST CENTREu201D and settlement type as u201CFULu201D for the maintenance orders (Order category u2013 30).
I was trying to configure the same in transaction KSR3_ORI to assign the strategy to the service order type by clicking u201CNew Entriesu201D system not showing the drop list for the status column which is a mandatory field.
We have applied the below notes:
Note 313454 - Info: Default value for settlement type
Note 851975 - Settlement use automatic generation creates
Could you please guide us to get the default settlement rule for service orders along with settlement type as u201CFULu201D

I was also with this problem in 2013 january and only found some information about this, here.
Our solution was change the Maximum number of distribution rules in Maintain Settlement Profiles to 1, because we wanted the FUL rule and it is always in the first line.
Now, for curiosity, I was search for another solution and found the SAP note 2028108 that explain that is not possible to change the strategy for PM/CS orders.
This note was released at 09.06.2014

Accruals Condition Record posted late in COPA along with the Settlement

Hi Gurus,
Accruals condition record for 1 item in an Invoice is posted along with the Settlement Credit Note in COPA. While condition records of the other items from the same invoice were posted on the Billing Date itself.
For eg:
Invoice 111       Date 01.03.2011
Items     Condition   value
1              Z1            100
2              Z1             200
3              Z1             300
COPA Doc No.        Value Field        Date
     001                         200             01.03.2011
     002                         300             01.03.2011
     003                         100             30.05.2011
30.05.2011 is the date of Rebate Credit Note for the Invoice # 111
I also got that if Posting of Accrual is not done for an Item, Retroactive rebate settlement automatically posts a new document for accrual.
So the question is why the posting of accrual was not done on the Invoice date in the first place?
Edited by: Parth Kulkarni on Jul 1, 2011 4:31 PM

Hi Suraj,
i too have the same problem, the condition types for Values and quantity in COPA are assigned. The system updates the quantity for the first billing document but not for the subsequent billing documents.
Cost of goods sold and revenue gets updated.
Regards,
Prateek

Maintain settlement rule of the sender

Dear All,
Hi, I am Settling the all orders in co88 t.code, i run test run mode for all orders.At the time of running i am getting the below error:
Maintain the settlement rule of the sender
Message no. KD205
Diagnosis
Either the settlement rule for the sender does not exist, or it is incomplete.
The settlement rule must contain settlement parameters and at least one valid distribution rule. A distribution rule is valid for a settlement run if
The settlement period is in the validity interval for the rule, and - if a settlement type was specified during settlement -
The settlement type corresponds to the rule for the specified settlement type.
Settlement type FUL -> The system selects all rules with the FUL and PER settlement types.
Settlement type PER -> The system selects all rules with the PER settlement type.
The settlement share is set for the rule (percentage, equivalence number).
Procedure
The settlement rule belongs to the sender master data, where you can maintain it.
Internal order
Proceed
CO Production order
Proceed
Project
Proceed
Cost object
Proceed
Network
Proceed
QM Order
Proceed
PM Order
Proceed
Production order
Proceed
Process order
Proceed
Sales order
Any body please help, where i can check the settings, I checked my settlement profile and allocation structure also.it's working properly, but i am getting the error at the time of order settlement in co88.
Thanks & Regards
Reddy

Hi
Each Order Type is assigned to the Settlement profile and in settlement profile the Settlemet receiver is maintained.
Genereal Critaria
Sales Order Settled               to Production order.
Production Order Settled       to Material
Internal order settled              to Cost center or GL
Please refer following T code.
OKO7     Creat settlement profile
Check for Periof End Activity in Costing.
Product Cost by Sales Order
Product Cost by Order
Internal Orders
Period-End Closing > Settlement > Create Settlement Profile

Maintain the settlement rule of the sender error

Dear Friends,
Using T.code Ko88, The following data has been entered.
Order :100010R.
Settlement period - 11
processing type - automatic
Selected the Test run.
When executed, the following error is displayed " Maintain the settlement rule of the sender" Message No: Message no. KD205
Settlement rule was selected and the settlement rule was displayed.
In the distribution rules, in the category FXA and GL are defined and in Settlement, it is Full and from and to date is 10,2010.
Please suggest how to solve the error?
Regards
Sridhar

Hi
Maintain only the FROM DATE... Remove the TO DATE as 10.2010 (Extend the TO DATE)
OR
Create a new settlement rule which is valid in the Period of Execution of settlement
Br, Ajay M

Problem in maintaining the settlement rule in the maintenance order

Dear Friends,
I have a problem ,When I am trying to maintain the settlement rule in the maintenance order ,I am getting information like below
Decentralized system -> note settlement rule is not distributed
Message no. /ISDFPS/PM124
Diagnosis
You navigated to the settlement rule.
System Response
The system informs you that a settlement rule can be created but that it will not be distributed to the target system. Settlement is carried out in the target system, where the order is usually settled to the WBS element of the operation.
Can anyone throw some light on how this is happeing and remedy?
Appreciating your early response

Hello
Please check
TC --> KSR2_ORC
Please maintain the Strategy Sequences for Automatic Generation of Settlement Rule.
You define a strategy sequence for automatic generation of settlement rules for internal orders.
Regards,
Rakesh
Edited by: RAKESH ASHOK MANE on Sep 3, 2010 12:37 PM

Error: Maintain settlement rule of the sender for a higher level WBS

Hi,
I dont want to maintain the settlement rule for a higher level WBS. How can i configure this in such a way that i dont get the following error:" Maintain settlement rule of the sender" while doing CJ88. Maintaing a separate Settlement profile for a higher level WBS is an option but we are looking if something else could be done The problem is that there are no actuals booked against, say, level 2 WBS but when i execute CJ88, i get the aforesaid error. How can i ensure that only the lowest level WBS ask for the settlement rule and not the levels above it. I have already removed the Investment profile from the higher level WBS but still getting the same error.
Regards,
DPil

Hi,
It is a type Capex WBS and Biling element is not checked. In fact i get a warning while doing the settlement: WBS is neither a billing element nor an account assignment element.
Diagnosis
WBS element is not indicated as either an account assignment element or as a billing element in the master record.
System Response
The WBS element cannot be assigned to an account.
Procedure
Correct your entries or add the missing indicator to the master record for the WBS element.
But this is just a warning. On pressing enter i get the error :Maintain settlement rule of the sender "

Cannot Maintain settlement rule for the activity

Dear All,
I tried to maintain settlement rule in activity under WBS. But it shows message :
You cannot maintain the settlement rule for the activity
Message no. CN006
Diagnosis
The network has header account assignment. You can only maintain settlement rules for the network header.
System Response
Processing stopped.
Procedure
Maintain the settlement rule for the network header.
Please help.
Cheers,
Nies

Hi,
I already tried the config OPUV (network type Parameters) but it shows the activity account assignment already ticket.
If i go to network header and go to settlement rule the warning message shows :
Network has activity account assignment
Message no. CN057
Diagnosis
Costs can only be written to activities for the network whose key you have entered.
System Response
Processing stopped.
Procedure
1. Check whether you have entered the correct key for the network. Change it if necessary.
2. Maintain the key for the network to which you want the costs to be written.
In addition, if i tick the activity under the network header : it shows
You cannot maintain the settlement rule for the activity
Message no. CN006
Diagnosis
The network has header account assignment. You can only maintain settlement rules for the network header.
System Response
Processing stopped.
Procedure
Maintain the settlement rule for the network header.
Cheers,
Nies
Edited by: Nies on Nov 6, 2009 3:26 AM

Settlement variant with monthly settlement periods

Hello Experts
I have created a settlemnet variant with a monthly settlement period for the current year as follows:
UM         UD       AD         Settlement Period
1             31       -1               1
2              28     -1                2
3             31      -1                3
up to December of 2011.
Since this is a new implementation i have indicated the settlement variant as year dependent.
Upon generating the cost collector in settlement unit , the settlement periods are coming out as follows:
01.02.2012--29.02.2012
01.03..2012---31.03.2012
it is actually taking intervals of the following year instead of the current year.
When i try to create another settlement variant with AD 0 , it prompts an error messge " Enter a valid value ".
How can i set up such a settlement variant with a monthly settlement period for the current yeasr.
Regards
David

Hi David,
Please check if settlement variant with the following attributes would meet your requirement.
year-dependant : no
settlement year: empty
UM UD AD Settlement period
1 31              1
2 28              2
12 31             12
Please do not fill field AD at all.
Hope this information is helpful for you.
Regards, Franz

HT201493 Will be "Find my Friends" automatically downloaded to my Iphone with the new IOS 6 release?

Will be "Find my Friends" automatically downloaded to my Iphone with the new IOS 6 release?

No. It's an app from the AppStore. Like all other apps from the AppStore you choose which ones to download.

[svn] 1267: fixed . patch creation to create patch with the selected files only, remove, fix newlines in the patch file.

Revision: 1267
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-04-16 17:02:53 -0700 (Wed, 16 Apr 2008)
Log Message:
fixed .patch creation to create patch with the selected files only, remove, fix newlines in the patch file.
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/tools/diffpack/diffpack
flex/sdk/trunk/tools/diffpack/readme.txt

All,
I thought it may be related to spaces in the path in which the script was called from. I tried having the ODBC command script in another directory but the same thing happens. It will give me the "CONFIGSYSDSN: Unable to create a data source for the 'Oracle in OraClient10g_home1' driver: Could not load the setup or translator library with error code -2147467259". As soon as the script is done running I can manually double click the script and it adds the DSN fine.
Thanks,
Clif Bridegum

LSMW using IDoc Method *Error :No partner exists with the name '', type ''*

Hi All,
I am a newbie. I am trying LSMW using IDoc Method.
I got an error when i executed Start IDoc Generation step: No partner exists with the name '', type ''
Could anyone tell what wrong I might have done,
Thank you,
Shiv Ram

Hi,
You have to setup your IDoc configuration in LSMW:
1) Enter the menu \Settings\IDoc Inbound Processing
2) Create a FILE port by clicking "Maintain Ports"
3) Create a logical system (LS) partner number by clicking "Maintain Partner Numbers"
4) Be sure your partner profile that you create is "Active" by clicking "Classification"
5) In the end click "Activate IDoc Inbound Processing" bottom.
Run your LSMW again. This time it shoud run wothout any problem.
Hope it helps.
Chang

Could not find a Handler associated with the following type

i keep randomly getting this error in some of my managed devices.
Could not find a Handler associated with the following type: printer policy.
Does anyone have any clue about this?
Thanks in advance.
Here are the log messages:
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:46.218] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [Begining to register policy handlers.] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:46.437] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [Registering handlers for Policy Handler Registration Module] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:46.437] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [Configuration file C:\Program Files\Novell\ZENworks\conf\PolicyHandlersRegistrat ion.xml] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.062] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [Deserialized 5 handlers] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.062] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [Got 5 valid handlers to register.] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.078] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [Loading handler assembly: C:\Program Files\Novell\ZENworks\bin\handlers\launcherconfig. dll] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.171] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [Registering launcher configuration policy with ActionManager.] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.171] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [register handler for launcher configuration policy returning True] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.171] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [Loading handler assembly: C:\Program Files\Novell\ZENworks\bin\handlers\WindowsGroupPol icyPlural.dll] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.296] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [Registering grouppolicy with ActionManager.] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.296] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [register handler for grouppolicy returning True] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.296] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [Loading handler assembly: C:\Program Files\Novell\ZENworks\bin\handlers\Printerenf.dll] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.390] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [printer policy] [] [Creating wrapper] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.500] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [printer policy] [] [Exception while creating Providers
Exception Details: The type initializer for 'Novell.Zenworks.PolicyHandlers.PrinterPolicy.Zenw orksPrinterProviderPINVOKE' threw an exception.
at Novell.Zenworks.PolicyHandlers.PrinterPolicy.Zenwo rksPrinterProviderPINVOKE.new_PrinterProvider()
at Novell.Zenworks.PolicyHandlers.PrinterPolicy.Print erProviderWrapper.GetProvider(ILoggerWrapper logger)] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.515] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [printer policy] [] [Exception in Handler constructor
Exception Details: The type initializer for 'Novell.Zenworks.PolicyHandlers.PrinterPolicy.Zenw orksPrinterProviderPINVOKE' threw an exception.
at Novell.Zenworks.PolicyHandlers.PrinterPolicy.Print erProviderWrapper.GetProvider(ILoggerWrapper logger)
at Novell.Zenworks.PolicyHandlers.PrinterPolicy.Print erPolicyHandler..ctor()] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.515] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [Exception occurred while registering handler printer policy. Exception details: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation.] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.515] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [Inner Exception details: The type initializer for 'Novell.Zenworks.PolicyHandlers.PrinterPolicy.Zenw orksPrinterProviderPINVOKE' threw an exception.] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.515] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [register handler for printer policy returning False] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.515] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [Loading handler assembly: C:\Program Files\Novell\ZENworks\bin\handlers\browserbookmark senf.dll] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.531] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [browserbookmarkspolicy] [] [Entered the constructor] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.531] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [Registering browserbookmarkspolicy with ActionManager.] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.531] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [register handler for browserbookmarkspolicy returning True] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.531] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [Loading handler assembly: C:\Program Files\Novell\ZENworks\bin\handlers\dluenf.dll] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.671] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [Registering dlu policy with ActionManager.] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.671] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [register handler for dlu policy returning True] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.984] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [MessageLogger] [] [Unable to write to event log (Application) using source (Novell.Zenworks.Logger) Exception: System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception: The event log file is full
at System.Diagnostics.EventLog.InternalWriteEvent(UIn t32 eventID, UInt16 category, EventLogEntryType type, String() strings, Byte() rawData, String currentMachineName)
at System.Diagnostics.EventLog.WriteEntry(String message, EventLogEntryType type, Int32 eventID, Int16 category, Byte() rawData)
at System.Diagnostics.EventLog.WriteEntry(String source, String message, EventLogEntryType type, Int32 eventID, Int16 category, Byte() rawData)
at System.Diagnostics.EventLog.WriteEntry(String source, String message, EventLogEntryType type, Int32 eventID)
at log4net.Appender.EventLogAppender.Append(LoggingEv ent loggingEvent)] [] []
[ERROR] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.671] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [EXTENSIONUTILS.RegistrationModule.FailedRegistrati onMessage] [The following modules could not be registered: printer policy. The configurations of these types would not be applied on this device.] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.984] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Policy Handler Registration Module] [] [Completed registration of policy handlers.] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.984] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [ModuleLoader] [] [Start() for module com.novell.zenworks.module.policyhandlerregistrati onmodule returned successfully] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:47.984] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [ModuleLoader] [] [Before calling Initialize() for module com.novell.zenworks.module.remotemanagement at path C:\Program Files\Novell\ZENworks\bin\modules\Novell.Zenworks. RMModule.dll] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:48.046] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [ModuleLoader] [] [Initialize() for module com.novell.zenworks.module.remotemanagement returned successfully] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:48.046] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [ModuleLoader] [] [Before calling Start() for module com.novell.zenworks.module.remotemanagement at path C:\Program Files\Novell\ZENworks\bin\modules\Novell.Zenworks. RMModule.dll] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:48.046] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Remote Management Module] [] [(RMMODULE_DEBUG)Initialized(RMMODULE_DEBUG)] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:48.078] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Remote Management Module] [] [(RMMODULE_DEBUG) Adding Property Pages (RMMODULE_DEBUG)] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:48.078] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [PolicyManager] [] [Entered PolicyManager.RegisterComponent] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:48.078] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [PolicyManager] [] [Registered the component remotemgmt] [] []
[DEBUG] [01/10/2012 11:27:48.109] [1736] [ZenworksWindowsService] [5] [] [Remote Management Module] [] [(RMMODULE_DEBUG)Trying to START service in Start Method (RMMODULE_DEBUG)] [] []

matos02,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other self support options and support programs available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://forums.novell.com/

Schedule line category CN is inconsistent with the MRP type

Guys,
I am running into an issue here..
I have change the MRP type of articles from ND (no planning) to PD (MRP)
Now when I try to change sales oders on this articles (VA02), I get error message saying that the Schedule line category CN is inconsistent with the MRP type
Does that make sense to any of you and what is/are the remedies
KR - Loï

Dear
When you have created SO at that time the MRP type was ND so based on that System has picked the Schedule line category CN which is No mat.planning. Create new SO this problem will not come. Based on Strategy & PD schedule line category will come as mat. planning.
Regards
ABhijit Gautam

GR/IR expenses not affected with the settlement rule run process in the GL

Please neglect by previous post with the same title
There is a problem I face while running the settlement rule process related to internal orders on the GR/IR expenses.
According to the internal order settlement rule every expense associated to an Internal order no. whether its an account payable or manual journal accounts it should be settled (distributed) on the cost centers specified in each internal order after the monthly settlement run process is done through T.Code "KO8G", and this actually happens on the entries that are booked manually through T.Code "FB50", but the GR/IR entries is the biggest problem, it didn't reflect the settlement rule distributions in the GL it just gives me the original transaction once its was automatically created through T.Code "MIGO" they are only allocated to a one profit center with no cost center and without being distributed to a multiple cost centers according to the distribution strategy.
After a long search I found that the cost center distribution occurred only on a secondary none GL account named A&P Settlement (720010), all GR/IR expenses was settled correctly only on this account not through the ordinary GL accounts (e.g. Gifts, printed materials) and of course the correct distribution didn't appear in the GL,
So is there a transaction or any way to allocate the GR/IR expenses to there correct cost centers with the correct cost element in the GL?
Is there anything to do with the GR/IR calculation that depends on quantity base not value base?
The Process as follows:
(1) Creating Internal order with a settlement rule (E.g. Cost center 1 (50%) Cost center 2 (50%)
2) Creating a purchase order associated to an internal order
3) The Goods received and creating the GR transaction T.Code "MIGO"
Acc/DR Expenses accounts
Acc/CR GI/IR Account 400301
Profit enter ###### (eg. 111177)
Cost Center <blank>
Internal order no. ####### (e.g. 9810512)

4) Closing the GR/IR accounts when receiving the invoice T.Code "MIRO"
When we receive vendor invoice:
Acc/Dr GI/IR Account 400301
Acc/Cr Vendor Account
Profit enter ###### (eg. 111177)
Cost Center <blank>
Internal order no. ####### (e.g. 9810512)
5) Performing the Internal order settlement rule run process
(N.B. By entering the report of the cost center (Actual/Plan/ Variance) T.Code S_ALR_87013611
I found that GR/IR expenses was not charged on the concerned cost centers as shown in the GL )
Your Reply is highly appreciated

Thanks for your kind reply,
But is there a way solve this problem?
And what is the use of leaving a field in the account assignment tab for an internal order while creating a PO and it will not take advantage of the settlement rule????????
And as you know the internal order settlement is a way to create a multiple account assignment
Can we solve the problem by making an automatic fake transaction that reverse the value of the GR/IR and creating another transaction can apply on it the settlement rule??
You know that settlement rule process is one of the best features in the SAP system it save time and effort to make distributions manually

Automatic Creation of Settlement rule with the settlement type - AUC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for