Default settlement rule with settlement type as FUL for service orders

Hi Folks,
Could you please advise me on the below issue?
Requirement: setting up of default settlement rule with default settlement receiver as u201CCOST CENTREu201D and settlement type as u201CFULu201D for the maintenance orders (Order category u2013 30).
I was trying to configure the same in transaction KSR3_ORI to assign the strategy to the service order type by clicking u201CNew Entriesu201D system not showing the drop list for the status column which is a mandatory field.
We have applied the below notes:
Note 313454 - Info: Default value for settlement type
Note 851975 - Settlement use automatic generation creates
Could you please guide us to get the default settlement rule for service orders along with settlement type as u201CFULu201D

I was also with this problem in 2013 january and only found some information about this, here.
Our solution was change the Maximum number of distribution rules in Maintain Settlement Profiles to 1, because we wanted the FUL rule and it is always in the first line.
Now, for curiosity, I was search for another solution and found the SAP note 2028108 that explain that is not possible to change the strategy for PM/CS orders.
This note was released at 09.06.2014

Similar Messages

Settlement Rule for service order created based on sales order

Hello,
I am creating a sales order and entering WBS as an cost object.
After creation of sales order the Service order is created.
For service order type in the settlement profile WBS is maintained.
But the system is not copying the WBS in Service order which is maintained in sales order.
Can any body have an idea on this?
Regards
Abhijit

Hi,
As far as my understanding when service order is created through sales order then settlement rule is SDI and its item number
Not what you maintained in account assignment tab of sales order
When you settle service order then cost will settle on sales document and its item and then latter you settle sales order then settlement receiver is WBS element which you maintained in account assignment tab
Kapil

WBS Settlement rule control for service orders

Hello,
We have an requirement to implement validation point for service order settlement rule. Currently there is no validation check of settlment rule for service order. So that the settlement is happend to incorrect receivers in service orders.
For example :
Service order created for company code - 400 and the settlement rule receiver should be WBS which is belongs to same company code but some case , user are maintained wrong WBS in settlement rule which belongs to some other company code.
Can you please hlep us on this requirement and suggest any enhencement point avalible on the same.
Thanks
Risha

Hi,
Please go to okg2,
Calculate wip or result analysis
remove the tick for Order In Engineer to Order Production
Now run result analysis and check whether settlement will not happen for cross company code.
please check this and revert back.
Thanking you
Vengaiah Chowdary

Order type dependent parameters for process order

Hello friends,
In Order type dependent parameters for process order (T.C COR4), there is subscreen for Process data documentation.Inside it we have three options :a) Batch Record Required
b) Order Record Required
c) No Process Data Documentation Reqd.
Through F1 help whatever information i have got regarding them, is not cleared.
According to it, if i select Order Record Reqd, than first of all i will have to delete (archieve) the order record than only i can delete (archieve) the process order.The same is with Batch Record Required.
So according to it if i want to delete the process order than first i will have to delete order record.So guys may i know which order record firstly i have to delete?Than only the system status for process order will not have the status ORRQ (Order Record Reqd).
And one more thing friends,if i select the third option No Process Data Documentation Reqd than which process data documentation system will not create?Or what will happen if i select this third option?
Thankingy you guys in advance.

HI
For process data documentaion pls check the following link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/89/a43ea8461e11d182b50000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Thanks

Data Source to get activity type(ActTyp) for service orders.

Hello friends..
Could you please provide, with the data source, that can be used to derive activity types (ActTyp),for service orders.
(Not maintenance activity type (PMACTTYP, in BI))
I have checked ZLIS_18_ORDER, where i could find (Maintenance activity type, ILART) but not Activity type.
Or if we need to create a Genric DS for same, could you ppl please provide me with the table name, to get the Activity type.
Thank you.
Raghu

Thank you Rajesh,
Could you please lemme know, how can i pick this value, as there is no AUFNR (Order Num) in this table, so that i can pick up using order number.
Thanks '
Raghu

Automatic Creation of Settlement rule with the settlement type - AUC

We have a situation where I have created an Internal order for AUC. But unable to create the setlement rule automatically with the settlement type -AUC. Please guide us.

Hi,
This is possible through investment management module.
Define an investment profile using OITA and assign the asset class of AuC in investment profile. Assign investment profile to internal order master data.
AuC will be created on settlement automatically on settlement of inernal order when processing option "Automatic" is selected in KO88.
Regards
Chetan.

SD mass input of settlement rules with LSMW

Hi Experts
I am looking for a type 'fast entry' screen in adding settlement rules missing in old documents. Profitability has not been maintained for some 4 years and there after some 50 000 errors where they are missing. I want to do an LSMW but it seems to complicated on VA02 as it is always another item number etc.
Do you know of an entry screen with Sales order number, item number, received type, receiver and full settlement please? I will use this in an LSMW.
You help will be appreciated.
Kind regards
Dawn

If you can do it manually, then you should be able to do it through batch-input.
Suggestion is quite obvious, but maybe it will help you.

Auto Settlement rule creation problem at the time of PM order release

In SPRO, for order type GEN, already customization available as "Madatory for Release" for order type. But still automatically settlement rule is not being created in IW31/IW32 at the time of release.
If I go to Settlement rule in GO TO option-Settlement Rule in IW32, then system is asking me two options as as With default and Without default. With default settlement, settlemement rules are coming.
But my query is, even if it is mandatory for release, why system is releasing without creating distribution rule in IW31?
Pl. let me know if any config missing.
Vijay

Hi,
Please read note 195607 and see if it helps
regards
Waman

How to do settlement for service order - error message

Hi,
FYI, right now i'm involving with sap enhancement implementation (4.6c to Ecc6.0).In 4.6c I'm using Z program (SA38) to maintain settlement rule & create session name and then, KO8G for performing settlement.In log issue session, everthing is ok (status - process) and no error in log (but it still goes to dummy cost centre).
in Ecc, i still using same program and T-code, but error message in log exist.(status - Incorrect)
Notification is completed --> can only be displayed
Rule cannot be deleted
Order 1000000933: no costs or revenue exist
Invalid account assignment category (--> long text)
Transaction error
can anyone give me guidance and how to handle this issue? does any configuration maybe wrong or not, please help me. I'm very appreciated your helps.i'm also looking method which using standard t-code (without customize program) to perform service order settlement.user manual very useful and important for me.
Thanks.

Hi
anyone can helps me?
Thanks

Backflush Components With Movement Type 101 When Confirm Production Order

Hi PP Gurus,
I found that we have a backflushing material (procurement type: F) in 'Good Movement' with movement type 101 instead of 261.
The movement type of this material (procurement type: F) in reservation is 261. How did system determine the movement type 101 there?
Is there any user exit used there?
Appreciate any help. Thanks.
Regards,
Sun Qiang

>
Qiang Sun wrote:
> Hi Arun,
>
> The control key has not been changed.
>
> In another production order, the error ocurred on another component which is the first line in 'Goods Movement'.
>
> Cheers,
> Sun Qiang
Hi,
Pl check in component overview which operation has been assigned to pericular material in Operation tab.
It should be 10.
Arun

Incorrect message type in IDOC for Purchase order change

Hi Gurus.
Please advise on below.
We have several purchase orders that are configured to trigger IDOC upon change. But accidentally, someone has deactiveted the automatic proposal of EDI message type for these Purchase orders which resulted to not transmitting purchase order change documents automatically.
As a workaround, we have proposed to create EDI message manually during Purchase order change. But upon checking in tcode WE09, message type is ORDERS which is PO create instead if ORDCHG for purchase order change.
Please kindly advice on why it is behaving like this for purchase orders with EDI message previously deactivated.
Thanks in advance.
Acel.
To simulate.
Create PO. go to messages, select EDI message then deactivate permanently. Save PO. Release PO if needed. Change PO. go to messages, EDI is not automatically proposed. create EDI message mamanually. Save PO. Release PO id needed. check tcode WE09, for PO create, no IDOC since it was deactivated permanently. For PO change, IDOC was triggered but with incorrect message type ORDERS instead of ORDCHG.

Hi Acel,
You will need to check the settings in transaction WE20 - You will be using a Partner Profile to determine the outbound message, either for each vendor or a generic one.
on the outbound parameters, you will need to ensure that ORDCHG is set up as a message type. If not, add it, ensuring that you use the message ORDCHG, the basic type (or extension) that you are using, usually ORDERS05 and make sure that in message control, you have process code ME02 set up. This should enable the correct message type to be determined.
Regards,
Rob

Print smartforms for service order with printer, not a spool in CRM WebUI

Dear Experts!
We have a long list of different print forms for a service order. We would love to have a list of these forms appearing when clicking on "Print" button to choose from.
We have made appropriate settings in SPRO (CRM -> Basic Functions -> Actions -> Actions in Transaction -> Change Actions and Conditions -> Define Action Profiles and Actions & Define Conditions). Option "Print Immediately" is set, and the Output Device is set to local printer. So now we have the following results:
- When clicking "Print Preview", a window appears where one of the possible forms may be selected to be shown as PDF.
- When clicking "Print", one of the forms is being moved to spool. So, you may only enter the spool in GUI and send the document to printer.
There is only one help topic about printing, that says:
Prerequisites
Actions are displayed on the Print pushbutton if the following criteria are met:
-The print action is set as relevant for the toolbar
- A print smart form is defined as the processing type
- The action is set to Execute immediately
- The action is inactive, that is, it is set to be executed manually
Please, give us a hint on how to make customizing to send document right to the printer.

Hi Alex,
This Business Add-In (PRINTER_DETERM_PPF) is used in the Actions (CRM-BF-ACI) component. It enables you to determine a printer more flexibly than the standard Customizing activity allows you to. For example, if you want to print an e-mail confirmation from a local printer in your office, and not from the usual printer for your entire department, you can use this add-in to do so.
Get back to me for a more info.
Hope this helps.
Cheers, Satish

Problem with MIGO goods issue to a Service Order

Hello All
I have checked through out the forum as well as google and can not find the answer to my issue. Please read the below details and advise....
In MIGO; when trying to perform a goods issue to a service order (created in IW31) I get an error message the document does not contain any selectable items. I can not get passed this. When I use the transaction MB11, it works just fine. I went to the allowed transactions in OMJJ to ensure MIGO was listed as an allowed transaction... and MIGO is listed so I know that is not my issue. It is not related to the service order not being released as it is and plus if it was not released it would not work in MB11. I need this to work for the transaction MIGO....Please someone guide me in the proper direction of what is missing.

Hi Kimberly,
When you post the goods issue as an unplanned goods movement against the order, the reservation is not even read, so it is never updated.
The data that you enter manually in this unplanned goods issue does not even need to match with the data in the reservation: the material, the plant... evrything can be different. The order is just a CO Account Assignment in this case and the reservation is not processed in any moment. This way, it is not possible to close the reservation when posting this kind of unplanned goods issue, as the reservation is not even considered (and, therefore, never updated).
It is only when you post the planned goods issue referencing the order directly when you really post your goods issue with reference to the reservation behind the order. Only in this case is when the data in the posting is checked against the reservation (the material, the plant, etc cannot be changed because they are taken directly from the reservation). Also, it is only in this case when the quantity in the posting is checked against the quantity in the reservation. If we issue the total reserved quantity, the reservation is closed automatically.
In the first case for the unplanned goods issue there is never an automatic update of the reservation because the posting does not even consider the reservation. It is only when you post the goods movement with reference to the order (in MB1A using "To Order..." and in MIGO "Goods Issue + Order") when the reservation is taken into account in the goods movement and, therefore, updated.
You can also refer to the SAP Library:
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/a5/6337db43a211d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
It says:
"This withdrawal is unplanned because there is no reservation to be referenced."
An unplanned goods issue with the movement 261 and the order (working as CO account assignment object) is more or less the same as a 201 for a cost center. The cost center and the order are just CO Objects in this scenario.
I hope this helps you further!
Best regards,
Esther.

Problem with document type on WF for parking document

Hello
Iu2019m actually working on the SAP workflow dealing with the FIPP object and the event u201Ccreatedu201D (FI park document transaction (FV60)).
The problem is that the WF is launched for all document types wich is not the need of the customer. Iu2019m looking for a solution to launch the WF for some specific document types.
Iu2019ve already tried to use the workflow variant, approval groups, paths and procedure with no success. (SPRO -> financial accouting-> accounts receivable and accounts payable -> business transaction -> incoming credit invoice memo -> make and check setting for document parking)
Thank you for help.
SL

Here is the solution I have eventually found :
1- Application of the OSS note 559276 which enables the customizing of the workflow variant (the transaction OBWD becomes here effective)
2- Assignment of the documents types, workflow variants and release approval groups with the transaction OBWD.
Therefore, the document types that are not defined in the transaction OBWD will not require validation (no workflow will be launched).
SL

Problem with Condition Type in BAPI_QUOTATION_CREATEFROMDATA2 for Txn VA21

Hi All,
I am using BAPI_QUOTATION_CREATEFROMDATA2 for Sales Quotation by txn VA21.
In this txn,There are 22 condition types available in my system.
The problem is,it is updating every condition type twice.
Pls give me the solution.
Regards,
Shiv Kant

Hi,
I am giving billing document code, we are using BAPI to upload billing documents into SAP.
you can check pricing conditions code. we are using only two pricing condition types. our technical consultant hardcoded condition types.
wa_billingdata-salesorg = wa_bill5-sorg.
    wa_billingdata-distr_chan = wa_BILL5-dist.
    wa_billingdata-division = wa_BILL5-div.
    wa_billingdata-doc_type = 'ZSO5'.
    wa_billingdata-ordbilltyp = 'FX'.
    wa_billingdata-bill_date = wa_BILL5-BDATE.
    wa_billingdata-sold_to = wa_BILL5-CUSTNO.
*    wa_billingdata-price_date = WA_BILL1-BDATE.
   wa_billingdata-country = wa_BILL5-CNTRY.
    wa_billingdata-bill_to = wa_BILL5-custno.
    wa_billingdata-currency = WA_BILL5-CURR.
    wa_billingdata-wbs_elem = wa_bill5-wbsele.
    wa_billingdata-xblnr = wa_bill5-billno.
    wa_billingdata-zuonr = wa_bill5-invoiceno.
flag1 = 1.
endif.
translate wa_bill5-matdesc to upper case.
    SELECT MATNR FROM MARA INTO IT_MARA up to 1 rows WHERE MATNR = WA_BILL5-MATDESC.
            endselect.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
      wa_billingdata-plant = wa_BILL5-PLANT.
      wa_billingdata-NO_MATMAST = ' '.
      wa_billingdata-material = WA_BILL5-MATDESC.
      wa_billingdata-REQ_QTY = '1'.
      wa_billingdata-ACCTASGNMT = '05'.
   else.
       wa_billingdata-ACCTASGNMT = '05'.
       wa_billingdata-NO_MATMAST = 'X'.
       wa_billingdata-SHORT_TEXT = 'ADAGE MATERIAL'.
       wa_billingdata-TAXCL_1MAT = '0'.
       wa_billingdata-SALES_UNIT = 'EA'.
       wa_billingdata-material = WA_BILL5-MATDESC.
       wa_billingdata-REQ_QTY = '1'.
   endif.
flag = flag + 1.
    wa_billingdata-ref_item = flag.
    append wa_billingdata to billingdata.
    wa_conditiondata-data_index = flag.
     wa_CONDITIONDATA-cond_value = WA_BILL5-ADVERTISCOST.
    wa_conditiondata-cond_type = 'EK01'.
    append wa_conditiondata to conditiondata.
clear wa_conditiondata.
    wa_conditiondata-data_index = flag.
     wa_conditiondata-cond_value = WA_BILL5-COMM.
    wa_conditiondata-cond_type = 'ZCOM'.
    append wa_conditiondata to conditiondata.
clear wa_conditiondata.
IF TESTRUN IS INITIAL.
move-corresponding wa_bill5 to wa_bill2.
wa_bill2-status = 'P'.
append wa_bill2 to it_bill2.
modify zzbilling from table it_bill2.
commit WORK.
ENDIF.
REFRESH IT_BILL2.
endloop.
flag1 = 0.
flag = 0.
IF TESTRUN IS INITIAL.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BILLINGDOC_CREATEMULTIPLE'
*   EXPORTING
*     CREATORDATAIN         = creaord
*     TESTRUN               = 'X'
*     POSTING               = 'X'
    TABLES
     BILLINGDATAIN         = billingdata
     CONDITIONDATAIN       = conditiondata
*     CCARDDATAIN           =
*     TEXTDATAIN            =
*     ERRORS                =
      RETURN                = bapiret
      SUCCESS               = succ.
Regards,
Chandra

Default settlement rule with settlement type as FUL for service orders

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for