Settlement variant with monthly settlement periods

Hello Experts
I have created a settlemnet variant with a monthly settlement period for the current year as follows:
UM         UD       AD         Settlement Period
1             31       -1               1
2              28     -1                2
3             31      -1                3
up to December of 2011.
Since this is a new implementation i have indicated the settlement variant as year dependent.
Upon generating the cost collector in settlement unit , the settlement periods are coming out as follows:
01.02.2012--29.02.2012
01.03..2012---31.03.2012
it is actually taking intervals of the following year instead of the current year.
When i try to create another settlement variant with AD 0 , it prompts an error messge " Enter a valid value ".
How can i set up such a settlement variant with a monthly settlement period for the current yeasr.
Regards
David

Hi David,
Please check if settlement variant with the following attributes would meet your requirement.
year-dependant : no
settlement year: empty
UM UD AD Settlement period
1 31              1
2 28              2
12 31             12
Please do not fill field AD at all.
Hope this information is helpful for you.
Regards, Franz

Similar Messages

Automatic Creation of Settlement rule with the settlement type - AUC

We have a situation where I have created an Internal order for AUC. But unable to create the setlement rule automatically with the settlement type -AUC. Please guide us.

Hi,
This is possible through investment management module.
Define an investment profile using OITA and assign the asset class of AuC in investment profile. Assign investment profile to internal order master data.
AuC will be created on settlement automatically on settlement of inernal order when processing option "Automatic" is selected in KO88.
Regards
Chetan.

Gap errors in Settlement Variants?

Hi there
I am trying to create a settlement unit with a settlement variant which is defined as monthly starting from the 1st of December until 30 November the next year.
When I use this variant, my settlement unit returns the error RESCSU041.
"Gap exists between settlement periods 01.12.2012-31.12.2012 and 01.11.2013-30.11.2013"
My settlement variant is defined as
Month Day Adjustmemt Period
12 31 ___ 1
1 31 -1 2
2 28 -1 3
3 31 -1 4
4 30 -1 5
5 31 -1 6
6 30 -1 7
7 31 -1 8
8 31 -1 9
9 30 -1 10
10 31 -1 11
11 30 -1 12
I have defined all the other 11 variants too in exact fashion and no errors are returned. Is there anything obviously wrong with this one?
Regards
Edited by: Joe Oppenheim on Jan 11, 2012 1:45 PM

Hi Joe,
I have just one question for better understanding. Why did you not define a monthly settlement variante that follows the year,just like this:
1 31     1
2 28     2
3 31     3
4 30     4
5 31     5
6 30     6
7 31     7
8 31     8
9 30     9
10 31     10
11 30     11
12 31     12
Regards, Franz

Default settlement rule with settlement type as FUL for service orders

Hi Folks,
Could you please advise me on the below issue?
Requirement: setting up of default settlement rule with default settlement receiver as u201CCOST CENTREu201D and settlement type as u201CFULu201D for the maintenance orders (Order category u2013 30).
I was trying to configure the same in transaction KSR3_ORI to assign the strategy to the service order type by clicking u201CNew Entriesu201D system not showing the drop list for the status column which is a mandatory field.
We have applied the below notes:
Note 313454 - Info: Default value for settlement type
Note 851975 - Settlement use automatic generation creates
Could you please guide us to get the default settlement rule for service orders along with settlement type as u201CFULu201D

I was also with this problem in 2013 january and only found some information about this, here.
Our solution was change the Maximum number of distribution rules in Maintain Settlement Profiles to 1, because we wanted the FUL rule and it is always in the first line.
Now, for curiosity, I was search for another solution and found the SAP note 2028108 that explain that is not possible to change the strategy for PM/CS orders.
This note was released at 09.06.2014

PMIS report with week as period

Hi
We want to create a new PMIS info structure to run with transaction MCIS.
We already have some self-defined info.structure. But all of them are with month as period.
Now we want to create one with week as period.
We have managed to do that.
But we have not managed to get the actual cost postings into the correct week.
Either it comes in the week of 1. day in the month, in week the order is created or released.
We do not manage to configure so the cost is seen in MCIS in the week of the posting date.
Anyone have any experience with setting up weekly based self-defined info structures?
Best regards
Tom

Tom,
This is not possible, since PMIS reads the cost entries from PMCO table, where the cost is stored by monthly basis.
You will have to write some custom reports using ABAP or BI or BO to accomplish your needs, reading directly from the controlling table COEP and then manipulating the values as required.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Narasimhan

Is it possible to run MRKO settlement for previous month date.

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement from client, where they need to do the MRKO settlement in previous month period.
I know the posting date and document date by default taken as current date.
For Example : I have done the GI on 25/05/2010 and forgot to do the settlement on the same month
now suppose on 02/06/2010 i want to do the settlement for 25/05/2010.
In this case system will take the current date as posting date, is it possible here to change the posting date to
pervious month period 25/05/2010????
what is the standar rule according to SAP and if it is possible to post in the back date will it impact anything further.
Please help me in solvning this issue.
Rabindra S

Use Exit "EXIT_RMVKON00_001".
It read the date from posting date and settle on given posting date
And follow the follwing code....
DATA: wa_rkwa TYPE rkwa,
 wa_bseg TYPE bseg,
 wa_bkpf TYPE bkpf,
 fieldname(80),
 myidx TYPE i,
 ex_poper LIKE t009b-poper,
 ex_gjahr LIKE t009b-bdatj.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <fs_date> TYPE rkwa-bldat.
MOVE '(RMVKON00)SO_BUDAT-HIGH' TO fieldname. "<fs_bkpf>-budat.
ASSIGN (fieldname) TO <fs_date>.
LOOP AT t_rkwa INTO wa_rkwa.
CALL FUNCTION 'DATE_TO_PERIOD_CONVERT'
 EXPORTING
 i_date = <fs_date>
 i_periv = 'V3'
 IMPORTING
 e_buper = ex_poper
 e_gjahr = ex_gjahr
 EXCEPTIONS
 input_false = 1
 t009_notfound = 2
 t009b_notfound = 3
 OTHERS = 4
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
 MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
 WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
ENDIF.
READ TABLE t_bkpf INTO wa_bkpf
 WITH KEY bukrs = '1000'
 belnr = wa_rkwa-belnr
 gjahr = wa_rkwa-mjahr.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
 myidx = sy-tabix.
 wa_bkpf-monat = ex_poper.
 wa_bkpf-gjahr = ex_gjahr.
 wa_bkpf-budat = <fs_date>.
 wa_bkpf-bldat = <fs_date>.
 MODIFY t_bkpf FROM wa_bkpf INDEX myidx. " TRANSPORTING bldat budat.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Regards
Rasmi Ranjan Mishra

GR/IR expenses not affected with the settlement rule run process in the GL

Please neglect by previous post with the same title
There is a problem I face while running the settlement rule process related to internal orders on the GR/IR expenses.
According to the internal order settlement rule every expense associated to an Internal order no. whether its an account payable or manual journal accounts it should be settled (distributed) on the cost centers specified in each internal order after the monthly settlement run process is done through T.Code "KO8G", and this actually happens on the entries that are booked manually through T.Code "FB50", but the GR/IR entries is the biggest problem, it didn't reflect the settlement rule distributions in the GL it just gives me the original transaction once its was automatically created through T.Code "MIGO" they are only allocated to a one profit center with no cost center and without being distributed to a multiple cost centers according to the distribution strategy.
After a long search I found that the cost center distribution occurred only on a secondary none GL account named A&P Settlement (720010), all GR/IR expenses was settled correctly only on this account not through the ordinary GL accounts (e.g. Gifts, printed materials) and of course the correct distribution didn't appear in the GL,
So is there a transaction or any way to allocate the GR/IR expenses to there correct cost centers with the correct cost element in the GL?
Is there anything to do with the GR/IR calculation that depends on quantity base not value base?
The Process as follows:
(1) Creating Internal order with a settlement rule (E.g. Cost center 1 (50%) Cost center 2 (50%)
2) Creating a purchase order associated to an internal order
3) The Goods received and creating the GR transaction T.Code "MIGO"
Acc/DR Expenses accounts
Acc/CR GI/IR Account 400301
Profit enter ###### (eg. 111177)
Cost Center <blank>
Internal order no. ####### (e.g. 9810512)

4) Closing the GR/IR accounts when receiving the invoice T.Code "MIRO"
When we receive vendor invoice:
Acc/Dr GI/IR Account 400301
Acc/Cr Vendor Account
Profit enter ###### (eg. 111177)
Cost Center <blank>
Internal order no. ####### (e.g. 9810512)
5) Performing the Internal order settlement rule run process
(N.B. By entering the report of the cost center (Actual/Plan/ Variance) T.Code S_ALR_87013611
I found that GR/IR expenses was not charged on the concerned cost centers as shown in the GL )
Your Reply is highly appreciated

Thanks for your kind reply,
But is there a way solve this problem?
And what is the use of leaving a field in the account assignment tab for an internal order while creating a PO and it will not take advantage of the settlement rule????????
And as you know the internal order settlement is a way to create a multiple account assignment
Can we solve the problem by making an automatic fake transaction that reverse the value of the GR/IR and creating another transaction can apply on it the settlement rule??
You know that settlement rule process is one of the best features in the SAP system it save time and effort to make distributions manually

GR/IR monthly settlements, automatic assignments in Sales order & Co code

Hi,
1) what are the transactions involved in the GR-IR month or period end settlements?
2) If I select account assignment in line item in PO, the goods directly received by cost center, what will be the entry to be passed?
3)Goods receipt happend but no further transacion done means no receipt of IR as will issue to any where, in such case what will be the entry to be posted ot nullify the stock?
4) Where we assin the Profit center in sales ordet for automatic posting?
5) Where we assign the Business Area in company code for automatic posting?
Regards,
NSB

Hi
T.codes: MR11, F.19
Regards
Odaiah Pelley

Settlement of the month end process order KKS1 & C088

Hello all ,
we are trying to settle the variance & upadte WIP for the month end but facing some problems.
When try to Run KKS1 getting the errors for some ordera as
Only remaining var. in version 0 - no target costs for 000001003928.
Should we just ignore these errors & proceed with the settlement which is using Txn CO88.
Also if I run the CO88,I hope it just updates the WIP account so whether there is any high risk of running this transaction.
Any documentaion on CO88 will be helpful & also if you can explain what is reasons for the errors on KKS1 then it will be quite helpful .
Thanks,
AG

Hello All ,
One more question . I have done the variance calculation for my process order via KKS2 but when I run CO88 it does not settle this order . Not sure what is the criteria for order not considered for the settlement.
Order already has the delivered & Techoed status.
Thanks,
AG

FM Integration with IO Settlement

Hi Gurus,
We implemented FM BCS, In our monthly Internal Order settement my Consumed Budget in the IO are
Returning back as released budget and it allow to spend these budget further,
How can i restrict the this issue and we dont want any FM documents while settlement.
Please Suggest
BK

Hi,
If this settlement does not generate FI document, then the effect in FM will occur only if you switched the integration with CO in PSM-FM. You can deactivate this integration if you want to supress this effect.
If FI document is generated with the settlement, you can use FMDERIVE strategy to deviate the FM address to a dummy one in case of a settlement. You can buil this rule based on business transaction, for example.
Regards,
Eli

Accruals Condition Record posted late in COPA along with the Settlement

Hi Gurus,
Accruals condition record for 1 item in an Invoice is posted along with the Settlement Credit Note in COPA. While condition records of the other items from the same invoice were posted on the Billing Date itself.
For eg:
Invoice 111       Date 01.03.2011
Items     Condition   value
1              Z1            100
2              Z1             200
3              Z1             300
COPA Doc No.        Value Field        Date
     001                         200             01.03.2011
     002                         300             01.03.2011
     003                         100             30.05.2011
30.05.2011 is the date of Rebate Credit Note for the Invoice # 111
I also got that if Posting of Accrual is not done for an Item, Retroactive rebate settlement automatically posts a new document for accrual.
So the question is why the posting of accrual was not done on the Invoice date in the first place?
Edited by: Parth Kulkarni on Jul 1, 2011 4:31 PM

Hi Suraj,
i too have the same problem, the condition types for Values and quantity in COPA are assigned. The system updates the quantity for the first billing document but not for the subsequent billing documents.
Cost of goods sold and revenue gets updated.
Regards,
Prateek

CJ88 Cannot proceed with FUL settlement to Final asset

We have a PO with WBS as account assignment. Users posted a down payment to this PO in 12/2010 and when they ran the settlement Type 1 (Automatic) it posted a DP posting to the AUC transaction type 180.
In Standard SAP transaction, this will get reversed if the users post the invoice and executes CJ88 again.
Now, our problem is that, the invoice was not posted until now, and the DP is still open in the AUC. THey want to do settlement to the final asset but is getting an error CJ88 type 3 (FULL)
*ORIGINAL Error:* You cannot post comp. retirement for asset 102000121 0 with this trans.type
Message no. AA341
Diagnosis
A down payment was posted to asset 102000121 0. In depreciation area 01, if not elsewhere, all down payments were not cleared.
Procedure
Before posting a complete retirement on this asset, you have to first clear the down payment in all depreciation areas.
FY 2010 is now closed in asset. I tried posting an ofsetting entry for the DP on FY2011. I used ttype 181. I tried to re-setlle type 3 (FULL) but now, the error message refers to Area 32
*AFTER POSTING TTYPE 181:*You cannot post comp.retirement for asset 102000121 0 with this trans.type
Message no. AA341
Diagnosis
A down payment was posted to asset 102000121 0. In depreciation area 32, if not elsewhere, all down payments were not cleared.
Procedure
Before posting a complete retirement on this asset, you have to first clear the down payment in all depreciation areas.
Our Dep area 32 is configured to take values from 01 but reflect it in USD and it is set to AREA NOT POST.
Does anyone have any thoughts why the system is checking area 32 if its deriving values from 01?
Additionally, how can i clear the DP in 2010, with a posting in 2011 and be able to execute the settlement to final asset.
Thanks

Hi,
Please review the note 35309.
As the long text of the error suggests, the cause for this error is most likely down to downpayments which are not yet settled.
In general the settled down-payments and their clearings should be balanced to ZERO in the settlements.
In investment measures with summary settlement you will always get the error AA341, if the down-payment balance is not zero.
Regards Bernhard

Settlement process with wip, ra and co-pa

Hello Every one,
My current project is in construction industy. We are implementing copa here. Now i want to understand the settlement process with WIP AND RA with copa. Kindly provide me some good documets which can explain me business flow and document postings in RA, WIP and Settlement with CO-PA module.
Any help will be of great importance. Thanks in advance.
Regards
Abhishek

Hi Waman,
Question about this - How do I get the results analysis to post COPA? I have created a cost element for the results ananlysis posting (which is not recommended by SAP). Then I set OKB9 to COPA, but it is posting COPA with blank segment (only compnay code!). I can see the sales order & sales order item # in the FI line item. But this info is not sent to COPA!
Thanks,
Jean

How to view change documentation for settlement variants in CJ8G

One of my settlement jobs did not run and I am trying to see what was populated in it...I have already changed the variant and I am currently settling new projects using that variant. Is there any way to look at what was populated in the variant during the settlement job that didn't run?

Hi
You have 2 possible solutions to meet this requirement.
Option 1: Implement point # 3 of SAP OSS Note 943559
Option 2: This is a workaround solution to skip standard SAP check for activation of change documents of Classification system and allow entries to be written into CDHDR and CDPOS table through MM01 / MM02 / CL20N tcode
Solution: Implement an implicit enhancement inside include program 'LCLVFF10', at end of subroutine 'FILL_REDUN' i.e. line number '337'.
Here modify the entry of table 'REDUN' where OBTAB = 'MARA' and set the flag 'AEBLGZUORD' equal 'X'. This will activate the change document creation for Change Object 'CLASSIFY' in CDHDR and CDPOS tables.
Sample Code
LOOP AT redun WHERE obtab EQ 'MARA'.
redun-aeblgzuord = 'X'.
ENDLOOP.

Know anything about an E-Book credit: specifically, "The credit results from the Settlements reached with publishers Hachette, HarperCollins, Simon

Know anything about an E-book class action credit? specifically... "The credit results from the Settlements reached with publishers Hachette, HarperCollins, Simon & Schuster, Macmillan, and Penguin in antitrust lawsuits filed by State Attorneys General and Class Plaintiffs about the price of electronic books ("E-books"). Apple Inc. is not a party in these settlements."

The information supplied by 8802 is correct.
For those who have not received the e-mail from E-Book AG Settlement Administrator, here is something to check.
The e-mail I have associated with my iBookd (iTunes) account has a "Moderate" spam blocker on it.
My son called and asked if I had received my credit, as he had. He advised he found it in his "Known spam" file.
I checked my account and it was not in the spam folder, why it should have been is beyond me. For the heck of it I checked the "Known spam" file. There it was, received on 26th. Thank goodness I didn't have the account set to automatically delete known spam, or it would have been gone. If I hadn't have checked it would have been purged automatically in 15 days.
There is no logical reason for this e-mail to have been considered as "Known spam", but there it was.
Possibly Apple wanted to comply with notifying those affected in the case, but was hoping many wouldn't find the authorization for rebate in time. Something to consider.

Settlement variant with monthly settlement periods

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for