Automatic Posting of Purch Condition (Not Require Invoice Verification)

For each line on the purchase order we have a number of different conditions types.  PB00 (Gross Price), ZLFR(Land Freight), ZSTX(State Gallonage Tax) are just a few that we have.  Currently all the conditions required invoice verification once the p.o. has been received.  What we would like to do is automtically post the ZSTX condition without having to do the invoice verification.  The other condtion would required invoice verification as normal.  Is this possible and if so how should I go about doing the configuration?

From the wording of your question I presume that you do not use a Goods Receipt. Correct me if I am wrong.
A solution for you question would be to use Goods Receipt in your process and configure your ZSTX condition to post an amount against an account that you determine via the standard account determination (similar to SAP's freight conditions).
The amount from PB00 would then be handled via a GR/IR account.
Here's an entry point for Some Selected Conditions
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/75/ee131355c811d189900000e8322d00/frameset.htm
Best,
Ralf

Similar Messages

  • Delivery note in invoice verification

    My friend iam new to MM
    What is the use of delivery note in goods reciept
    i can  do the goods reciept with out delivery note too
    where the real difference comes please explain me
    in invoice verification with out the delivery note i can directly use
    in which scenario i can use delivery note
    please explain me

    Hi,
    In MM Purchasing Scenario the vendor supplies a material along with a delivery note.
    This no: you can refer while you do a GR in MIGO & you will also enter the Qtys in the Qty as in Del note in the MIGO item details part.
    Now you can refer the delivery note no: which you captured using MIGO while you do a invoice verification using the transaction MIRO.
    Now the delivery note no: is normally very useful incase of a PO having multiple GR's.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards,

  • Workflow Steps send automatic emails, but this is not required..??

    Hello,
       we have a strange problem we got recently with our workflows steps we are using.
       The Workflow Steps and Workitems works all just fine, the Issue is that some times the trigerred Workflow Steps automaticly send an an external email to the User outlook with the Wokitem Text & Description, i dont remember that i have activated any thing to send email in the Workflow steps we are using...Please help and advice why this emails is sent out and how we can deactivate it.
    We are using the standard SAP Performance Management Workflows, Example WF-Step: TS12300110.
    Thanks and Kind Regards,
    Nazih

    Again, i would like to clarify some thing here:
    1. The Workflow Tasks we are using in out Process are working just fine.
    TS12300110
    TS12300111
    TS12300115
    TS12300112
    TS12300096
    2. In this SAP Workflow Tasks, there is no step which send an email to the WF-User.
    3. To send an Email to user we can use the Reports RSWUWFML mor RSWUWFML2 as you mentioned, i know this well and yes they are planned in the System with a Variant, but which does not include our Workflow Tasks in it. and also the Report RSWUWFML is planned to run once a day in the evening, but we are getting the Emails directly after triggerring the WF-Tasks...strange?
    4. I have checked the Tcode SWE2 and found one entry to the WF we are using:
    BOR-Objekttyp     APPR_DOC     INFO_APPRAISER_CHANGE_APPROVE     WS12300115
    If i deactivate here i will shut down the Workflow ..right?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Nazih

  • Auto a/c det for Invoice verification

    Hi
    What is the procedure for Automatic account determination for invoice verification? not for inventory managment
    What are the value strings for invoice verification
    Thanks
    Raju

    Hi,
    Account Determination: -
    Use: - When you post an invoice, the system updates various accounts in Financial Accounting. It determines automatically which amounts have to be posted to which accounts.
    Account assignment is based partly on your entries when you enter an invoice, partly on information stored in the system and partly on the system settings.
    Prerequisites: - The system administration must define and configure the accounts in the chart of accounts when implementing the ERP system in your company.
    Features: -
    ·        Your entries provide the following information:
    ¡        Which vendor account must be posted to?
    ¡        Which amounts must be posted?
    ·        The material master record provides the following information:
    ¡        Which valuation class does the material belong to?
    ¡        Which type of price control is required for the material?
    ¡        Which account must be posted to for the material?
    ¡        Is the stock available smaller than the quantity invoiced?
    ·        Posted documents provide the following information:
    ¡        What is the purchase order price?
    ¡        Has a goods receipt been posted for the purchase order?
    ·        The system settings provide the following information:
    ¡        Is the invoice posted as a net or a gross amount?
    ¡        Which G/L accounts must be posted to?
    Important Accounts for Invoice Verification: -
    The following accounts are particularly important for Invoice Verification:
    Vendor Account: - There is a separate account in the sub-ledger for each vendor that all amounts concerning this vendor are posted to. Making a posting to the vendor account is not the same as making a payment; payment is only made when the Financial Accounting department posts the vendor's payment to a bank account.
    Stock Account: - In the ERP system, there is no separate account for each material. Instead, different materials with similar features are grouped together in a common account (for example, raw materials: acids). The account relevant for a material is defined in the material master record when a material is created.
    The system only posts to the stock account when a price difference occurs for an invoice.
    GR/IR Clearing Accounts: - The GR/IR clearing account is an u201Cintermediateu201D account between the stock account and the vendor account. At goods receipt, the net invoice amount expected is posted to the stock account. The offsetting entry is posted to the GR/IR clearing account. This posting is then cleared by an offsetting entry on the vendor account at invoice receipt.
    Tax Accounts: - The system makes postings to special tax accounts when invoices include tax.
    Price Differences Accounts: - Price differences have to be posted to a price differences account if price differences have occurred in an invoice and when invoices are posted net and no posting can be made to the stock account.
    Cash Discount Clearing Account: - When you post an invoice net, the cash discount amount is taken into account in the invoice, it reduces the value of the items; the offsetting posting is made to the cash discount clearing account, which is then cleared when payment is made.
    Freight Clearing Account: - The stock account is debited with the planned delivery costs at goods receipt and the system makes the offsetting posting to a freight clearing account. This posting is then cleared by an offsetting entry to the vendor account at invoice receipt.
    Also refer link;
    Account Determination for LIV

  • Invoice Verification MIRO

    Dear All,
    This is about invoice verification block after MIRO posting-
    In PO we have set it as 2 way match, once the PO is equal to Invoice verification then the system should not put any payment block. But if it doesnt match the value of PO to IV then the system should put invoice verifcation block (R) in the accounting document.
    Here, whatever we post that is whether the PO value is matching or not the invoice verification block (R) is appearing in the accounting document. Does any one gone through similar issue....
    I want to know how this can happen?
    Checked validations but nothing that sort appears.....is there a way to find out how this happens....
    Thanks to all in advance.

    Hello
    I do not know of any BAPI. But you can set an automatic block up through your payment terms.
    Check the following customizing path for this:
    Financial Accounting
    ->Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable
       ->Business Transactions
         ->Incoming Invoices/Credit Memos
           ->Maintain Terms of Payment
    Select the details for the payment term and check for the indicator there to set the default block key.
    Hope this helps
    Ray

  • Why there is chanage "Free for payment" to "Invoice verification" aftr MIRO

    Hi Friends,
    Please suggest me why there is a change from "FREE FOR PAYMENT" to " INVOICE VERIFICATION" after posting of MIRO.
    My client is asking this doubt. However i have checked by posting MIRO but failed to find out.
    Please provide a detailed clarification for this doubt.
    Your quice reply in this issue would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Naveen Kumar.

    Hi Friends,
    Please find the below question from my client.
    "While booking Invoice with PO by using T.Code MIRO, i set status payment block is "Free for Payment" after positng, it automatically changes from "Free for Payment" to "Invoice Verification" so payment team can not run payment for the item.
    Please help me to resolve it."
    For your information i checked Vendor Master in XK03. status of payment is like Free for payment.
    Please suggsest me correct answer to clarify my client's doubt
    Looking forward for your kind help
    Thanks & Regards,
    Naveen Kumar.

  • Blocking the invoice verification

    Hi Friends!
    My client wants to block the invoice verification (MIRO) if the material is under quality stock. Till the usage decision is not done invoice verification should not be allowed against that PO.
    Pl. Help
    Regards
    Naveen

    Hi,
    If you want GR to be blocked unless QA clears the material i.e. MIRO should be done only when Inspection lot qty is posted to Unrestricted use stock, then i am afraid it can be done only with an user exit
    only prerequisite being creation of inspection lot for GR
    way to block MIRO before UD posting is done is thru an enhancement
    LMR1M001
    Here you need to post following code to block MIRO in include:ZXM08U16
    this code will cause an error message before UD and will allow MIRO for only qty posted to Unrestricted stock
    *& Include ZXM08U16
    Declaration of variables
    DATA: w_prueflos TYPE qamb-prueflos,
    w_lmenge TYPE qals-lmenge01.
    Declaration of Internal Tables
    DATA: itab LIKE qals OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
    LOOP AT e_tdrseg WHERE selkz EQ 'X'.
    Checking whether the document require Inspection
    CLEAR: w_prueflos.
    SELECT SINGLE prueflos
    INTO w_prueflos
    FROM qamb
    WHERE mblnr = e_tdrseg-lfbnr
    AND zeile = e_tdrseg-lfpos.
    IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
    CLEAR: itab[], itab.
    SELECT SINGLE * INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF itab
    FROM qals
    WHERE prueflos = w_prueflos
    AND stat35 = 'X'.
    IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
    READ TABLE itab INDEX 1.
    CLEAR: w_lmenge.
    Sum of quantity (Excludes Block stock)
    w_lmenge = itab-lmenge01.
    IF e_tdrseg-menge GT w_lmenge.
    MESSAGE ID 'ZMM' TYPE 'E' NUMBER '004' WITH w_lmenge e_tdrseg-lfbnr.
    ENDIF.
    ELSE.
    MESSAGE ID 'ZMM' TYPE 'E' NUMBER '005' WITH e_tdrseg-lfbnr.
    ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
    Hope this helps
    Regards
    Dheeraj...

  • Invoice verification and logistic invoice verification

    Hello,
    What is the different between invoice verification and logistic invoice verification?
    My Japanese client need to work with t.code: VXJ2 - customs declaration for import billing documents - Japan
    When i run this report, it finds no data.
    I read the help for this transaction and it says that only invoice verification (and not logistic invoice verification) is supported for this transaction.
    Best regards,
    Avishai Kaplan

    Hi Avishay, 
    Logistics Invoice Verification 
    Logistics Invoice Verification is a part of Materials Management (MM). It is situated at the end of the logistics supply chain that includes Purchasing, Inventory Management, and Invoice Verification. It is in Logistics Invoice Verification that incoming invoices [Seite 11] are verified in terms of their content, prices, and arithmetic. When the invoice is posted, the invoice data is saved in the system. The system updates the data saved in the invoice documents in Materials Management and Financial Accounting.
    Logistics Invoice Verification is closely integrated with the components Financial Accounting (FI) and Controlling (CO). It passes on the relevant information about payments or invoice analyses to these components.
    Features:
    In Materials Management, Logistics Invoice Verification has the following features:
    u2022 It completes the material procurement process, which started with the purchase requisition and resulted in a goods receipt.
    u2022 It allows invoices that do not originate in materials procurement (such as services, expenses, course costs) to be processed.
    u2022 It allows credit memos to be processed, either as invoice reversals or return deliveries.
    Invoice Verification 
    The main aim of invoice verification is to ensure that vendors are paid the correct amount at the right time ( not too late but also not too early ). The process should have a high incidence of fi rst-time matching, to ensure that as little time as possible is spent trying to manually match invoices that appear to be incorrect.it is important to include as few steps as possible in the process, considering that the process of handling payments
    does not in itself add value to the company or to the vendor.
    Main steps: 
    The capture of the vendoru2019s invoice details
      The matching of those details to the details that we
    believe to be correct
      The investigation of any mismatches
      The release for payment of matched invoices
      The accounting entries involved ( including taxes and
    delivery costs )
      The details recorded for audit purposes 
    Hope this information helps you out in understanding the differences  between the two
    I ncase of any further clarification do put a message
    In case if this information is of any help to you please do reward accordingly
    Thanks  & Rewards
    Pavan

  • Linking Subcont challan and Invoice verification

    Hi,
    Can we restrict unless Subcontract challan reconcile and Complete posted, system should not allow invoice verification?
    Regards,
    Sattuj

    Dear friends,
    Any other views on this?
    Regards,
    Sattuj

  • De-linking (Valuation class & GL A/c) automatic posting in Invoice booking

    Experts,
    I have a issue regarding link between FI & MM
    From what I understand,
    there is a link between Service & Valuation class
    & also a link between valuation class & GL.
    This link enables automatic FI line item posting while invoice booking.
    My question:
    1. Can we break the linkage between valuation class & GL i.e. we want to stop the automatic posting
    2. What is the effect of above
    3. Would you advise to do this .. ? Why?
    Regards,
    KPS007

    Hi,
    SAP standard process are the best business practises and it should changed only when we have genuine business problem and not for people issue.
    There are several scenarios will occur during MIGO and MIRO. For each scenario system should determine a correct Inventory account, GR/IR clearing account, Price difference account and etc. First you need to prepare an excel sheet with all your possible business scenario, valuation area/valuation grouping code and their respective GL accounts. Once you have listed out all the scenarios and correct GL accounts, you can configure the system as per your requirement. Initial home work is needed to avoid any difference in account posting. Hence try to fix the source of your problem rather than changing the best practise. Account determination is vast and it cannot be explained here but please refer the below link.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/12/1a39516e36d1118b3f0060b03ca329/content.htm
    Regards,
    Senthil

  • Automatic posting of excise invoice in case of deemed export

    Hi All,
    We have a scenario of Deemed export.
    Our client want automatic posting of excise invoice at the time of billing for all scenario.
    Its working fine for domestic and export sales. But in case of deemed export system is not picking the correct excise invoice type.
    I have maintained settings in Defaulf setting for excise group and series group. For deemed export i have used separate shipping point also.
    Request you to guide in this case.
    Its urgent.
    thanks in advance.
    Full points will be awarded to all answers.
    Kind regards,

    Dear Ravi
    As you would be aware as for as generation of excise invoice is concerned, it is based on series group.  So have you maintained a seperate series group for deemed export.  If so, once again check in Default Excise Group and Series Group that you have assigned the new series group to your sales area.
    Since also you said that it is working fine for domestic and exports, it is always better to compare the settings with the one for Deemed exports.  I feel somewhere the settings is missing for deemed exports.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Third party sale scenario: COGS not allowed as automatically posted.

    Dear Gurus,
    I have come across this error during execution of third party sale scenario.
    When the user enters a PO with reference to PR which is in reference to SO, one error pops up which says COGS cannot be automatically posted only.
    When I deselect the "Post automatically" tick, the PO can be saved.
    Process we are following during third party sale process:-
    1. Sales order.
    2. PR with reference to Sales order.
    3. Purchase order with reference to PR.
    4. Statistical GR with reference to PO.: COGS Dr. To GR/IR Clearing account Cr.
    5. Sales Invoice: Customer Dr. To Sales Cr.
    6. MIRO: GR/IR Clearing account Dr. To Vendor Cr.
    I have my own doubts on the statistical GR part. Can you pls. validate the same.
    Also in case of third party sale, what will be the CO object as COGS is not created a cost element. (SAP standard)
    Regards,
    Harnish Shah

    Hi
    Please check the steps for 3rd business process.
    Sales Order:VA01
    List of Sales Order:VA05
    Purchase Order with reference to Purchase Requisition: ME21N
    Inbound Delivery:VL31N Material Receipt:MIGO
    Result Recording Work list:QE51N
    QM Usage Decision:QA32
    Activities due for Shipping `Sales Orders, fast display` VL10A (VL01N)
    Post of Goods Issue (PGI):VL02N
    Post of Goods Deliver:VLPOD
    Post the Billing doc VF01 or Maintain the Billing due list-VF04
    Release Billing Document for Accounting VFX3
    Delivery Document list ZVL05
    Edit Work list for Invoice List VF24
    Output of Billing Document VF31
    Customer Payment F-28
    As per my knowledge once psot the PGI,System will upddate COGS  values.
    Regards
    asuvamsi

  • Automatic Posting of Notas Fiscal Type

    Can you pls lemme know the configuration for automatic posting of Notas Fiscal which is used for Brazil to generate an invoice??

    Hi
    This doc has something about nota fiscal.
    Hope it helps
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/CAINTBR/CAINTBR.pdf
    Regards
    A

  • R100 - Condition ignored (requirement 055 not fulfilled)

    Hello
    I have configured free goods as per the requirement of my client. But in the sales order Pricing Analysis R100 condition type is not triggering and getting the below error.
    R100 - Condition ignored (requirement 055 not fulfilled)
    The requirement 055 is assigned to this condition in the pricing procedure. This requirement was not met and so the condition was excluded from further processing.
    Can you please advise.....

    +In response to what _Sureshndk_ wrote:+
    Hi friends
    >
    > I found the solution for my error posted above. There was no problem in any of the settings. Its just a confusion.
    AMAZING! I was checking in the main item level Pricing analysis overview, thats why it was showing as R100 - Condition ignored (requirement 055 not fulfilled).
    >
    > But in the header lever and sub item (free good item) level R100 is triggering with out any error.
    >
    > Thank you guys....
    > Suresh
    Just request don't be in hurry to get you query solved quickly.
    Do a proper investigation before posting your query on Forum.
    As everyone will agree that, if the problem is not elaborate properly, we do make some assumption to provide solution.
    Finally, i would request you, "Try to respect others Time & Effort."
    Regards
    JP

  • Import invoice with status as Approval not Required

    Hi All,
    Can any one give the way to import an invoice with payables open interface import status as Approval not required.
    Thank you in advance.
    Raj.

    midimidi,
    > So to be clear...if the AS is on the main timeline,
    import statements
    > are not needed, and if the AS is external and imported,
    import
    > statements are needed.
    That's a general rule of thumb, but not 100% applicable.
    > Are there any other exceptions to that, or does that go
    for all AS3
    > classes?
    There are exceptions, and the easiest way to find them is to
    leave out
    your import statements and plug away ... sooner or later,
    you'll get a
    compiler error, and then you'll know. :)
    >> It did strike me *** odd though, an imported .as
    file uses the same
    >> publish settings as code on the timeline. So why
    treat them differently?
    FLA files have publish settings, but AS files don't. They're
    just text
    files. I hear what you're saying ... they end up getting
    compiled along
    with / into the some FLA anyway -- and that FLA does have
    classpaths
    listed -- but those same AS files might be compiled in Flex
    Builder 2 or
    some 3rd party compiler. It would probably make good sense to
    require the
    import statement for inline FLA code, but not everyone is a
    hardcore
    programmer, and Adobe knows it. Nothing is *hurt* by using
    import in FLAs,
    but for folks who just want to do light programming, the
    convenience of not
    having to use it is nice.
    David Stiller
    Adobe Community Expert
    Dev blog,
    http://www.quip.net/blog/
    "Luck is the residue of good design."

Maybe you are looking for