BADI - ac_document for Non Business Area updation in MIRO - Manual entry

Hi,
We have customised the above badi to Zac_document1 and implemented successfully in our system. It is working correctly and giving proper / expected result except while doing the manual G/L entry in MIRO (In some of the scenarios).
In our Production system, one of the end user has generated a MIRO document in reference to a PO. In actual Invoice there were miscellaneous charges added by the party (Vendor), but not mentioned those in PO. End User has adjusted those charges by debiting the required tax G/L  - u201CAP-CG Deduct-VATu201D account (In G/L Tab - in MIRO) and crediting the same amount to Material (In material tab of MIRO) that was used in PO.
While debiting the amount to G/L u2013 u201CAP-CG Deduct-VATu201D account, End User has not put the Business Area (In G/L Tab u2013 MIRO) which in turn result into entry in "Non Business Area" for the "G/L - AP-CG Deduct-VAT" irrespective of BADI was active in the system to update the business Area.
Could anybody suggest me the possibilities of non-picking up the Business Area in the line item of manual entry (In G/L tab of MIRO) entered in MIRO.
FI document is getting generated properly with updation of Business Area in all other scenarios (i.e. MIRO & SD Billing generation).
Points will be assigned to proper answer.
Regards,
Shridhar Sawant

Closing the issue from my side since there was inconsistancy in coding at our end.
Regards,
Shridhar

Similar Messages

  • Inter unit posting for blank business area

    Hi
    For  Inter unit posting we have executed the run in TC-F.5D & F.5E for the month april -- july which was successful.But while executing the same for the month of aug it is reading the document to be posted for IU run.But while executing f.5E it not generating the posting.Please adivice the possible reason for the same problem.Please consider it as a priority.
    Thanks
    shivaji

    Hi,
    I have an answer for your 1st question only.
    After putting the data in F.01 click on the "Arrow" which is there beside the option Business Area which will take you tor "Multiple selection for Business Area" window.
    In that window do not enter anything but select the 3rd option, "Maintain selection options". you will get one more window with the options 1. Single Value 2. Greater than or equal to and so on......
    Select, 1st option, Single Value and execute (F8). Also select - "Classical List" option under List Output in F.01, you will be able to see "Non Business Area" related GL's in Balance Sheet.
    Regards,
    Shridhar Sawant
    FICO

  • TTB1 Post Flows Business Area Update

    Dear All,
    while Posting post flows in T.Code TBB1 i am getting an error Balancing field "Business Area" in line item 001 not filled.  I had assigned the business area in step Allocate Additional Account Assignments to Account Assignmen
    Use. what else configuration is required for deriving business area in this regard.
    Warm Regards,
    Vasanth.

    Hi,
    The additional assignment of AAR is only the place where BA is integrated.
    Please check the AAR generated for the transaction is the same for which you defined Business Area as the key for updating BA is through AAR.
    Regards
    Prasad AV

  • GR/IR Automatic Clearing for Different Business areas items

    Hello All,
         we have different business areas, and some times we create a PO for all business areas and invoice it in a specific business area
    in F.13 automatic clearing:
    for GR/IR account
    Documents with different business area cannot be cleared.
    any idea to solve this issue is appreciated,

    Thanks for your reply,
    I've tried such a solution with more parameters ( EBELN, XREF3 and EBELP)
    but in F.13 :
    - the document cannot be cleared when >>> selecting GR/IR account special process.
    if we treat GR account as a normal GL account, I mean without selecting GR/IR account special process.
    the document can be clear
    i want to be able to clear the document with selecting GR/IR field ( is it possible )
    and if it is not allowed, do we will face a problem by clearing GR account without selecting GR/IR parameter ??
    Many Thanks

  • Depreciation run for each business area

    Hi all,
    In case all business areas are belong to 1 company code.
    So how to run depreciation for each business area separately?
    I mean business area A can run depreciation for itself, and not affect other business areas in the same company code.
    Any suggestion would be highly appreciate!
    Thanks in advance any help!
    HuyenTT

    no, this is not possible, as the depreciation run needs to be executed for the whole company code.
    Blaz

  • Query to find all workbooks/worksheets for each business area

    Hi Experts,
    I need to find all workbooks/worksheets in each business area. Collect 'Query Statistics is checked for all the users'
    Also are there any documents or information available of the description of the discoverer metadata database tables which will help in writing queries
    thanks and regards,
    John

    There is no workbook/worksheet linkage to a business area. So you cannot search for a business area and find all the workbooks "attached" to that business area. The attachment of workbooks is at the folder level. It is actually possible, if you are sharing folders among business areas, to create a workbook with data from 2 or more business areas. I have tested that and it is indeed possible. In Discoverer Administrator you can check on folder dependencies to see what workbooks use the folder. Though in my version of Discoverer, there is a problem with Discoverer Plus, such that the workbook save in Plus is not creating this dependency information like it should. At least I have not found any way to take a business area and determine what workbooks would fall under it. Maybe someone else has found a way.
    John Dickey

  • Single Cheque for Multiple Business Area

    Hi Experts
    How can I print one cheque for multiple business area with the option of printing different cheques still remaining?
    Thanks
    Nadia

    Hi Nadia.....If Iam not mistaken you DONOT want to make Separate Payments for each Business Area.
    In such a case donot select the checkbox Separate Payments for Business Area -FBZP--Paying Company code customisation.
    If this indicator is set, line items from different business areas are paid separately.
    Hope Iam clear about this.
    Please assign points if helpful
    Regards
    Aravind

  • Business Area missing in MIRO

    Hi all,
    I am facing problem with business area in MIRO. when I check MIRO for a PO and click on follow-on documents then it shows business area for few items but for some items its missing, please help me to solve the problem
    rgds,
    Shweta

    Hi Shweta,
    I cannot get the details of FS00 as mentioned by you as I am not linked to your server now.
    The GR/IR Clearing account is a centralized clearing and reconciliation account which works like a bridge
    which is getting debited on procurement and reversed during MIRO and is not linked to any Business Area.
    It is a Balance Sheet account which reveals the nature of goods received by your Plant whatever may be
    the storage location.  If the inventory account is there, it will show for which business area you have
    purchased.  During MIRO the GR/IR account becomes nil and it is an automatic internal posting through OBYC
    assignment. The other accounts will be vendor account which may carry BA classifications.  Hope you are clear.
    Best Regards,
    Sadashivan

  • Badi AC_DOCUMENT for updating prctr

    Hi ,
    I am trying to update the profit center ( prctr ) through the BADI AC_DOCUMENT.
    I have written the below code but its not posting and is giving me an error that document saved but not posted . Below is the code
    In the variable I am passing the profit center which I am getting from Z table
    DATA: ex_item type ACCIT,
          wa_ex_item type ACCIT_SUB.
    LOOP AT im_document-item INTO ex_item.
    wa_ex_item-mandt = ex_item-mandt.
    wa_ex_item-awtyp = ex_item-awtyp.
    wa_ex_item-awref = ex_item-awref.
    wa_ex_item-aworg = ex_item-aworg.
    wa_ex_item-posnr = ex_item-posnr.
    wa_ex_item-prctr = l_prctr.
    APPEND wa_ex_item to ex_document-item.
    endloop.

    Hi,
    Check that for which condition the message is triggering.
    Try to check the condition.
    Regards
    Sandipan

  • Best practices for EUL/Business Areas

    What is the best way to handle multiple business areas? Even if they have no relations with each other?
    Should I have one EUL with many business areas in it? Or many EULs with one business areas in each?
    Does any one know where I can find the advantages and disadvantages of each?
    Thanks,
    Rob

    Hey there (repost of a similar thread in this forum).
    Many clients I've been at have the exact same discussion. And the one I push for is to have 1 EUL, let the BIS views have their own business areas and like you said, don't customize them.
    For all corporate business areas, folders, etc. just create them in the same EUL but the business areas have a corporate prefix (ie: coca cola would have a CC_ prefix). That way ALL folders can access the BIS views if wanted (ie: join across business areas), special setups (ie: LOVs) could be in a particular business area where ALL folders could access) and updating BIS views with new versions would be a problem.
    I really don't like multiple EUL as it's one of those simple things that can be a gotcha' for many end users that drives the helpdesk nuts trying to understand why a particular user can see his info.
    Just my take (and of course, what I think is the 'best practice' 8-) ).
    Russ

  • Business area updation

    we have made a zprogram for updating business area field in bsis & bseg table for particular g/l but it is not getting updated in balance sheet if we see the balance sheet business area wise & the g/l are p/l items

    Hi,
    not knowing what reports you are pulling out, but I had the same problem some time ago.The G/L reports I was pulling out come from table FAGLFLEXT, which is the new general ledger totals table. Updating the classical tables (like BSEG) will not do the trick. However, I would be very careful about updating FAGLFLEXT, not sure why, just have never tried it before.
    Kind regards,
    Rudolf

  • Validation require for different business area in MRO

    Dear friends
    System is allowing posting of different business area in Miro (Line item & Header item).For disallowing I have checked Validation, I think it is not usable.Please suggest me another solution.
    regds
    sachin

    Hello,
    You can use MRM_HEADER_CHECK bAdI for this validation.
    or
    You can use Enhancement (CMOD transaction) LMR1M001 -EXIT_SAPLMRMP_010 for this validation
    Regards,
    Burak

  • Excise duty is not picking up for a business area

    Hi,
    please help me  ,The problem is
    while creating invoice it is found that exice duty is not picked up by the system for that invoice for a particular business area , so please suggest what setting has to be checked to rectify the error.Is
    Thanks
    Ahsan

    Excise Duty will flow based on your plant and CIN settings and not based on your business area.  So first check in your sale order / billing document whether plant is flowing.
    If you are in TAXINJ, ensure that you have maintained both the customer code and material code in J1ID.  If you are in TAXINN, ensure that the relevant tax code with that ED condition type is maintained in FV11
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Using current dimmensions for new business areas with coarser granularity

    Hi,
    I have a time dimension which has month, quarter, semester and year attributes.
    I am creating a new business area in which each fact refers to a quarter (we have no monthly data). In this case I am considering two options:
    1) Using an attribute in the fact table that points to the quarter field in the dimension table (or creating a quarter code in the dimension table, and pointing to that code -there is already month-year code as primary key-).
    2) Creating a new dimension table with just quarter, semester and year.
    What should be best? Is there another option?
    Thanks for yout help.
    Fernando.

    Hi Sam,
    I am not sure wheher memory is really a serious constraint anymore. Consider this:
    a) the price of memory today is pretty much at the price point of hard disks in the year 2000 (at least according to a study I saw). In 2000 we happily ran business systems without being worried about the cost of hard disks ... and that is where we are today with RAM. Sure, disks also became much cheaper, as did flash memory, but the speed benefits of RAM are so superior that it is worth investing in it.
    b) there are already 1 TB RAM blades available, and I think there is now a 2 TB RAM blade on the market (I heard about Samsung having one, and others may have one too)
    c) we indeed routinely achieve compression factors of 10-20 x. It all depends much on how full the table field is, and how homogeneous the content. A field "Currency" compresses great, a field with a "UUID (Universally Unique Identifier)" does not.
    d) customers typically only want to access this and last year's business data (and keep the rest just for reference)
    So I think that it is quite possible to have the active business data even of the largest SAP customers completely in memory, at a reasonable price point. Sure, more expensive than disk ... but who cares about disk anymore (apart for backup)?
    Kind regards, Oliver

  • Business area not appearing against VAT entry in Accounting doc for Invoice

    Dear All,
    We have configured Business areas,
    When we post an invoice with multiple line items and open the Accounting document for this invoice we find that Business area is visible against Freight Amount and the ,Sales  A/c but that no business area is appearing against the Vat payable amount in the accounting doc.
    Why so?
    what should we do so that system determines the business area against the VAT Account also.
    Regards,
    Avinash Gyale

    This could be due to two reasons
    1)  If one invoice contains multiple business areas, only blank space will appear in accounting document.  To avoid this, invoice split should happen based on business area.  Invoice split can be done through VOFM data transfer - billing document.
    2)  If a particular G/L Account is assigned in multiple Business Areas, this problem will come and you need to apply Substitution Exit RGGBS000
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

Maybe you are looking for

  • I have bought a new laptop how do I transfer my itunes library to it?

    I have recently bought a new lap top and I tunes is asking me to authorise it before it will allow me to play my previously purchased tunes. The instructions are to open I tunes, go to the store, open the menu and click on "authorise this computer" .

  • Handling C# events in ABAP

    Hi,     I am having a very bad time trying to make a C# custom control and an ABAP class talk to each other...     The control have many properties and methods, all of them perfectly accessible using a proxy class derived from cl_gui_control in ABAP.

  • Credit Limit related Issue

    The problem i am facing is that any amount received from the customer as security deposit or down payment  is treated in SAP as specialGL transaction and it is not captured by the system for the purpose of Credit Limit Check . Since there is no credi

  • How to enable webmail in Mac OS server 10.9

    Is there any way to enable or configure webmail in Mac OS server 10.9 but without installing Roundcube?

  • BPC 7.0 SP09 RUNALLOCATION

    Hi Experts! I´m having some trouble when running an allocation and it results is wrong: Suppose that some records which belongs to "EST_RDO" parent have to aggregate and its result have to put in one account: 3901010000. Their result depends on how e