GR/IR Automatic Clearing for Different Business areas items

Hello All,
we have different business areas, and some times we create a PO for all business areas and invoice it in a specific business area
in F.13 automatic clearing:
for GR/IR account
Documents with different business area cannot be cleared.
any idea to solve this issue is appreciated,

Thanks for your reply,
I've tried such a solution with more parameters ( EBELN, XREF3 and EBELP)
but in F.13 :
- the document cannot be cleared when >>> selecting GR/IR account special process.
if we treat GR account as a normal GL account, I mean without selecting GR/IR account special process.
the document can be clear
i want to be able to clear the document with selecting GR/IR field ( is it possible )
and if it is not allowed, do we will face a problem by clearing GR account without selecting GR/IR parameter ??
Many Thanks

Similar Messages

Validation require for different business area in MRO

Dear friends
System is allowing posting of different business area in Miro (Line item & Header item).For disallowing I have checked Validation, I think it is not usable.Please suggest me another solution.
regds
sachin

Hello,
You can use MRM_HEADER_CHECK bAdI for this validation.
or
You can use Enhancement (CMOD transaction) LMR1M001 -EXIT_SAPLMRMP_010 for this validation
Regards,
Burak

Number range based on different business area for same document type

Hi All,
The scenario is my client wants to give the different number range for a particular document type based on different business area.
Is there any user exit by which I can restrict the same.
Regards,
Meenakshi

Hello,
Document number ranges are created per company code and fiscal year. You cannot create / restrict the document number ranges per business area.
Business areas a independent of all organizational values, they cut across all company codes.
Regards,
Ravi

Single Cheque for Multiple Business Area

Hi Experts
How can I print one cheque for multiple business area with the option of printing different cheques still remaining?
Thanks
Nadia

Hi Nadia.....If Iam not mistaken you DONOT want to make Separate Payments for each Business Area.
In such a case donot select the checkbox Separate Payments for Business Area -FBZP--Paying Company code customisation.
If this indicator is set, line items from different business areas are paid separately.
Hope Iam clear about this.
Please assign points if helpful
Regards
Aravind

Problem abt automatic clearing for vendor

Dear all,
when we do automatic clearing for vendor with F.13, the system promoted that " Company code blocked by payment program (table T042X)"
whatelse need to do? Anyone know that?
Thanks in advance.
kathy

Hi All,
I am facing exactly the same problem.
I checked the table T042X, but the payment run which is mentioned there, is not visible in the drop-down menu for F110. May be it has been marked for deletion...
Let me know if there is some way to delete such Payment runs which are marked for deletion...May be that will slove the error in F.13.

Automatic clearing for Billing Reversal not working because of SPL 90

Hi all experts,
We recently implemented the Grants management module and SPL 90 is now active.
We are now having a problem with automatic clearing for billing reversals.
When I go to VF11 and try to reverse a document, the FI postings and FM postings seem to be happening. But the automatic reversal does not go all the way through because when it tries to post to special purpose ledger 90, it does not find the original document there and hence, stops.
Can someone tell me how to fix this?
Thanks a lot, in advance.
AJ

Can someone PLEASE look into this question?
I really appreciate your feedback.
Thanks.
A

Automatic payments with no Business Area aggregation

Hello,
I am trying to run an automatic payment program for one vendor and the system splits the open items by Business area. But I donu2019t want that. I would like to aggregate line items in one, if my payment is just one.
I've check my customization and in transaction FBZP, on selection "All Company codes" I donu2019t have the field "Separate Payments for each Business Area" selected.
Do I need any other customization?
Does anyone know some?
Thank you very much for your attention.
Regards.
Rita

Dear Rita,
In order to check Business Area Payment go to FI12 and verify if you have some Business Place assigned for your Home Bank definitions. You can also check in F110 parameters tab if there is some B.P. assigned for.
regards

Document Splitting with Different Business Area

HI
I have a situation, where i need to create a new document type and it needs to be configured in such a way that vendor invoices and credit notes can be booked with the correct doc splitting and using different Business Areas.
I like to know if this is possible, and if yes how.
Earlier the client used to post the transactions, with different business areas, as we get only a warning message to reset the business area of the vendor.
Now that we have activated New G/L accounting, with document splitting we get the warning message,
but then the profit center will not balance, so we have an error.
The client requires that they need to post to a different business area, and the document splitting should happen.
Any suggestions on this will be great.

Hi Srikanth,
In my config setting under Document Splitting i have the Zero Balance ticked for it.
My Scenario is as an Ex. I am debiting a G/L account for 1000, and giving Business Area X, with a cost Center which is assigned to Business Area X.
And Crediting a Vendor for 1000 with Business Area Y.
Will this scenario work with Document Splitting enabled, i am doubtful on this, but my client needs this.
Can you tell me if this is a possible scnerio.
If yes then how?

Proper use of one table in different business areas

Hi
We will be using certain DB tables in several business areas and we are more than one person to define them.
If a table is loaded from the database for each of the business areas it will be numbered 'table 1, 2...' which does't seem very desirable. Also I'd rather define hiearchies only once and for all.
If a table is loaded only once and used for all the business areas all the joins which are necessary in the different business areas are shown. This will be confusing. If one of us considers a certain join unnecessary he might accidentially delete the wrong one belonging to a different business area.
Exporting the business areas including the joins regularly is probably not a great help if afterwards new joins for other business areas were added.(?)
Am I misunderstanding the concept of Discoverer?
How do you handle such a situation?
Advice appreciated
Franziska

Hi Michael, et al,
I'm just planning my EUL and your comments in the last post seem relevant.
My general plan is as follows:
(1) Create a BaseMaster BA which is used to bring and tables/views from the database into disco. The folders in here will be created with "New Folder from database" and be fairly straightforward, with only very simple calculations and no aggregations in calculations. The joins will echo the joins in the underlying database. This is not shared with Users.
(2) Create a CustomMaster BA which contains Custom Folders which consist of various SQL views of the database. The SQL in these may use have some more complex calculations and these calculations may include aggregation. This will not be shared with users.
(3) Create a CentralMaster BA which contains Complex Folders which are assembled from items from the BaseMaster BA and the CustomMaster BA. These folders may include more complex calculations and the calculations may include aggregated items.
(4) Create a number of User BA's. Using Manage Folders, share the relevant Folders from the Central Master.
I've got a few questions relating to this.
(a) Custom Folders based on Folders
It would seem nice to me if it were possible to create Custom Folders which were based on other Folders, rather than Database Views. Then, even if you need a view and a complex transformation of that view in your business area, you still only have one place where the EUL brings that view into disco. My understanding is that this is not possible. Am I right? I suppose there could be an argument that complex transformations should be pushed back to the DBA but it seems reasonable to me that sometimes this sort of thing could be within the remit of the disco admin?
(b) SQL Efficiency
Am I right in thinking that generally a complex folder is usually not much less efficient than using a base folder because the SQL interpreter ends up optimising the SQL?
And a last question which has turned out rather complex - by all means ignore it if you like - it's me getting to grips with the process.
(c) Nested Complex Folders
I presume that if a transformation is needed which would in a normal database environment would need a mainquery and a subquery, then this could be done in a
number of ways (adhering to the above methodology) by:
(i) Get the DBA to write a view which does both mainquery and subquery and then bring into the BaseMaster and then straight into the CentralMaster folder.
(ii) Get the DBA to write the subquery, bring this into the BaseMaster and then implement the mainquery in the CentralMaster.
(iii) Create a Folder in CustomMaster which implements both mainquery and subquery and then bring this into the CentralMaster folder.
(iv) Create a Folder in the CustomMaster which implements just the subquery and then implement the main query in the Central Master.
If you've got this far - thankyou for baring with me.
Perhaps there's something written about this sort of thing or maybe it's just a matter of practice!
Any thoughts on all this would be much appreciated.
Kind regards
Suhada

Automatic Posting between Between Business Area...

Hi Experts,
I have an issue like automatic posting from one business area to other business area.
Here I have 2 BA's, I want to make settings like BA1 make a pymt on behalf of BA2. So the entry should be BA1 debit and BA2 credit(this is an example). And if BA1 purchase items from one vendor and paying through BA2, at the time of clearing both BA1 & BA2 has to be posted automatically.
Kindly help me the configuration steps.
Thanks in Advance,
mohdsams.

Hello Dawn,
Please find some more example,
Dr Exp A/C BA1   5000
Dr Exp A/C BA2    5000
Cr BankA/C BA1 10000
Dr Vendor A/C BA1 10000
Cr Bank A/C     BA2 10000
please help me to fix this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
mohdasams
Edited by: mohdsams on Oct 22, 2010 5:52 AM
Edited by: mohdsams on Oct 22, 2010 5:59 AM

Multiple integration flows for different business operations

Hi - I have following business requirement & need ur advice.
There are different business operations (read as INSERT/DELETE/QUERY) to performed on same business object (read as CUSTOMER). In order to develop these integration use case I can have following three approaches.
*1. Single Requestor ABCS & Single Provider ABCS -* Develop single integration flow & implement logic for the business operations in them. That means, Develop single Requestor ABCS for all business operations, which will call the EBS and again EBS would call same Provider ABCS. Both Requestor & Provider ABCS would implement business logic for all business operations required.
*2. Single Requestor ABCS & Multiple Provider ABCS -* In this case the flows for all business operations starts with single point service. That means, Develop single Requestor ABCS for all business operations, which will call the EBS and again EBS would call different Provider ABCS based on the business operations. The Requestor ABCS would implement business logic for all business operations required. There would be different ABCS service for different business operations.
*3. Multiple Requestor ABCS & Multiple Provider ABCS -* In this case the completely independent flows are to be developed for all business operations. Independent Requestor ABCS and independent Provider ABCS. Off course if there some common business logic for all or some business operations, those can be implemented as common service & can used across all independent flows for different business operations.
Please do suggest what approach would be best one to pick up. Or it is case to case basis. In case yes, please suggest the criteria on which the decision can be taken.
Thanks In Advance
Priyadarshi

Hi Pryadarshi,
AIA recommends having an ABCS for each Verb and Noun combination for a specific Business Process, i.e. CreateCustomerABCS and UpdateCustomerABCS. Therefore, #3 would be the preferred approach. This is to allow for maximum flexibility. However, you may have a process that demands to model the integration as #2.
The decision would depend on how the participating application services are modeled and the granularity of individual service call. For example, a ProcessCustomer invocation at the source end may call CreateCustomer provider service.
Regards
Rohit

Reservation of Stock for different business processes

Hi
We have a scenario like two types of sales processes are there
1. Direct Sales
2. E-sales
From Plant-A both sales will happen, but while creating sales order for direct sales 70% of the plant capacity and E-sales 30% of the plant capacity.
plant capacity we are mapping with planned orders
how can we acheve this.
reagrds
rajendra

I doubt that Reservation of Stock is possible for different business processes. Based on Sales Orders, the stock will be consumed.
Regards,
Rajesh Banka

Same folders in different business areas

Hi,
Is it possible to access folders across business areas?
I was not able to do the above so I created (New folder from database) the same folder into 2 different business areas. But I cannot have the same names. Why? I see some folders created previously with the same names in both the business areas. Is there some other way?
Thanks in advance.

Hello everyone
Business area names, folder names, and join names are unique across the system. It is possible to have the same folder in multiple business areas and this is not uncommon. It is also possible to reference the same object using multiple folders, making sure the identifier and folder names are unique.
If you have a folder that you want to duplicate, rather than share between business areas, you can highlight the folder in one area, copy it using CTRL-C, and the using CTRL-V paste it into the other area. Doing this gives you a copy of the folder pointing at the same underlying object. This is useful if you want to reference the same object several times, say for aliasing purposes or for ease of querying. I do this all the time when working with fiscal time folders and it works like a dream.
Hope this helps
Regards
Michael

Automatic Posting in different depreciation area (4.7 and 6.0)

Dear all,
I want to understand how it is possible the procedure of automatic posting in different depreciation areas.
Exemple: I post a specific movement via ABAON, and automatically the system creates another document (with sequencial number, because uses THE SAME DOCUMENT TYPE), to another depreciation area (using ASKB). And that procedure happens in 4.7 version.
Now, in different version, like ECC 6.0, the system react the same as in 4.7, but uses another method when creates the document, as I say in the next path:
Financial Accounting >Asset Accounting>Integration with the General Ledger>Post APC Values Periodically to the General Ledger>Specify Document Type for Periodic Posting of Asset Values
This is the customization part to associate the new document (another depreciation area, as I've explained before).
This step is possible to choose only one document type. But in version 4.7 (at least it is what is happening in my client) the document type is choosen according to the first document, the one, I post in ABAON (or another transaction with similar characterics).
Please anyone can help me?
Thanks in advance,
CCT

Addendum:
The options in ECC 6.0 are:
0 Area Does Not Post
1 Area Posts in Realtime
2 Area Posts APC and Depreciation on Periodic Basis
3 Area Posts Depreciation Only
4 Area Posts APC Directly and Depreciation     -> V2 update
5 Area Posts APC Only
6 Area Posts Only APC Directly                         -> V2 update
If in the area is set the posting indicator 4 or 6 (V2) than it means it's a virtual posting (like 'post direct'). The postings in those area area technically processed via "V2-update". With this update a log table is written where all successul updates of this area are stored.
When you start RAPBER2000 this log table is compared against all postings (since the last run) and if there is any posting missing RAPERB2000 collects this missing posting.
This means, if in background for some reason, that we cannot tell in retrospect, there was an update error, or an error occurs due to missing customizing (please check you ASKBN posting in transaction ARAL which should tell what happened during your posting) ASKBN will pick up the outstanding posting and created/posts the FI document.
In your case the difference might be that This documents is posted either directly per V2 posting (=realtime) or later with RAPERB2000 and this causes different document types.
regards Bernhard
Edited by: Bernhard Kirchner on Oct 15, 2010 5:34 PM

Different Business Area in Customer line item while Billing

Dear Friends,
We are on Ecc 6.0 and We have a requirement of Different Business Area in Customer line while billing. Since we had defined Business area location wise and requirement is Sundry Debtors should always book to Location as maintained in delivery plant field of sales area data in customer master.
Requirement:- Our material is assigned to Plant 115.In customer master, sales area data -> shipping tab -> Delivery Plant (KNVV- VWERKS), we are maintaining "112", Now while billing and while generating Accounting document account entry is
Customer 1000.00 (Business area=115)
sales 1000.00 (Business area=115)
But our requirement while accounting document after billing is
Customer 1000.00 (Business area=112), system should check and derive the same from TABLE KNVV - VWERKS(DEL PLANT)
sales 1000.00 (Business area=115).
Please revert.
Regards,
Sandeep

Dear Friends,
One can do the same via using a userexit.
Regards,
Sandeep

GR/IR Automatic Clearing for Different Business areas items

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for