BAdI implementation FIAA_BW_DELTA_UPDATE inactive in source system DEV

Hi all.
I'm trying to execute an infopackage to get 0ASSET (texts delta initialization). But it shows me the next error message: "BAdI implementation FIAA_BW_DELTA_UPDATE inactive in source system DEV".
But when I look at this BADI implementation in the source system (Transaction code se19) there are no errors on it.
"BAdI implementation FIAA_BW_DELTA_UPDATE does not contain any errors".
Do somebody knows what's happenning?

Hi,
If you are in version 3.1, then this BADI has an issue.
Kindly refer to the following note:
[SAP Note 590034 Deactivating implementation FIAA_BW_DELTA_UPDATE|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/oss_notes/sdn_oss_bw_bct/~form/handler%7b5f4150503d3030323030363832353030303030303031393732265f4556454e543d444953504c4159265f4e4e554d3d353930303334%7d]
Cheers...

Similar Messages

  • Can we have two R/3 Source Systems(Dev & Test) in BW Development....?

    Hi All,
    Till now we have only BW Development box..
    Our Landscape for R/3 side is R/3 Development, Testing and Production.....
    Already we have connected R/3 Development with BW Development... It is working fine as now... We have finished our task at Development...
    My doubt is <i><b>Can we Configure R/3 Testing to BW Development</b></i>....eventhough R/3 Development is already configured with BW Dev....
    <b>Can we have two R/3 Source Systems(Dev & Test) in BW Development....?</b>
    Please help me out in this issue....
    Your help will be appriciated...
    Regards,
    Kiran Telkar

    Hi Kiran,
    You can create second source system which will point to SAP R/3 Quality .
    If you have transported all datasource activation requests to QA environment then all datasources are available in R3QA as well.
    After creating source system , replicate datasources.
    Only thing you need to do is to replicate efforts of assigning source system (R3QA)-> creating transfer rule -> Create info package and load data.
    Hope that helps.
    Regards
    Mr Kapadia
    Assigning points is the way to say thanks in SDN.

  • Remote cube: bad performance of query in source system

    I have created a remote cube that looks to a simple R/3 view VBAK/VBAP.
    In a query on this cube I select document date. on the VBAK there is a special index on document date.
    It appears that my date variable is not included in the SQL statement that is executed on the sourcesystem. This means that on VBAK/VBAP always a full table scan occurs.
    The query on the source system (as generated by executing my BW query) looks like this. (the document-date = AUDAT):
    SELECT
      "MANDT" , "VBELN" , "POSNR" , "VBTYP" ,
      "AUART" , "AUDAT" , "VKORG" , "VTWEG" ,
      "SPART" , "VKGRP" , "VKBUR" , "NETWR" ,
      "WAERK" , "NTGEW" , "GEWEI" , "KWMENG" ,
      "VRKME" , "SHKZG"
    FROM
      "ZBW_2LIS11ITM"
    WHERE
      "MANDT" = :A0#
    My question is: Is it normal that for a remote cube always full table scans are executed. This appears to me a waste of system resources. Or is it a bug?

    Hi,
    if you are using ABAP routines for populating fields of your RemoteCube, you should provide 'inverse routines' as well. According to SAP documentation, this allows for applying filters in the source system rather than doing full table scans.
    An example can be found here: [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/en/45/f5af4a4db53482e10000000a1553f6/content.htm]
    Best regards
    Christian

  • SPDD and SPAU Request from Multiple Source System (Dev and Quality) ??

    Hi all,
    We have one query related with SPDD and SPAU automatic adjustment during Upgrade.
    We done SPDD in our Development systems and same is taken by SAPup during Quality Sytem PREPARE step from umauto.lst file.
    But we adjusted some object in Quality System as the SPDD request from Develpopment does not able to adjust all the request. We created one request for the Same in Quality System and the that also got added to umauto.lst file.
    Now during our during Mock run Upgrade, PREPARE ask to take only one system for SPDD request with following options
    1. missing systems
    2. Development (DEV)
    3. Quality         (QAS)
    4. None
    But we need both transport of  SPDD from DEV and QAN to be imported to Mock run Systems till Production.
    any suggestion to fix this ?

    Hi,
    Give the DEV requests for SPDD, and proceed. During DDIC_700 you will come across the DD objects which need to be corrected as you have done in QAS. here you need to open the system and correct them manually. Then only you should proceed. Be very carefull during this activity, as you may loose data if not done correctly.
    Regards,
    Suhas

  • The transport track TR000003 (source system DEV-100) is locked

    Experts:
    I get above error when trying to create a transport request.
    Could you help how to unlock it?
    Thnaks!

    Hi,
    Just go in TCode SE01 and check whether your transport request is released or not.
    If not than, first release the request.
    Or Other case may be that it is a local change request and such request can never be transported.
    Thanks
    Deepak

  • CLIENT of the source system in the Transfer Rules

    Hi,
    Can I get the CLIENT of the source system dynamically in the Transfer Rules (and assign it to an InfoObject)?
    I have a generic extractor from a R/3 source system. The table in the source system & the extract structure the DataSource both contain MANDT, but its not coming in the RSO2 screen (which, if I'm not wrong, is how it should be).
    I need the CLIENT info. in my BW data targets. I do not want to hardcode this value in Trans Rules as the client in Dev & Prod is different for my R/3 sys.
    If I can't get it directly from the DataSource, is there any way I can get it from any system field using routine?
    If I'm not wrong - SYST-MANDT in the Formulas will give me only my BW CLIENT.
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Regards,
    Melwyn

    hi,
    i think if your bw dev and prod client is different you can try in transfer rules
    if sy-mandt = xxx. ( bw dev client number)
       result = 'yyy'. (source system dev)
    else.
       result = 'zzz'. (source system prod)
    endif.
    or enhance the extract structure/ append structure with zz field for mandt and field in user exit zxrsau01 with sy-mandt
    or if use infoobject 0LOGSYS, populate in transfer rules with result = g_s_minfo-logsys.
    hope this helps.

  • Source system connection issues

    Hello BI Experts,
    We had issues with the source system connection - from our BI system (NW 04s) to our R/3 system (ECC 6.0) .
    From RSA1, when we right click on the R3 source sytem and do a "Check", it was erroring out: "Error in source system <Logsysname1>". This Logsysname1 was different one from the actual R/3 system's Logsys name (Logsysname2) .
    To Fix this, we restored the connection by selecting the (R/3) Source system and right click and "Restore".
    After providing the passwords for the RFC users, the system again asked "The Connection <XY> is used in the <Logsysname1> Source system as a connection." And we selected the "Delete" option here. Then in the Logon screen to R/3, we provided the administrator user Id and password.
    Once the source system connection is complete, we checked the connection as mentioned above and the "Source Sytem connection is OK" now.
    (1) But now, in the transaction RSA1, the R/3 system is displayed under "BI" instead of "SAP".
    (2) When we asked our BI consultant to check the dataloads, he encountered an error: "No transfer structure is available for InfoSource <X> in the Source system. Errors in Source system".
    How can we bring the R/3 system under "SAP" now?
    If we delete the R/3 system (which is listed under BI) and recreate under "SAP", will the transfer rules will also get deleted?? How to avoid this issue?
    Please advise.
    John
    SAP Basis.

    Hi,
    Please make sure that you have followed the below steps while creating the Source System
    1.     In the initial screen of the source system, choose Tools ® Administration ® User Maintenance ® Users and create a background user with a password and the authorization profile S_BI-WX_RFC.
    2.     Define the RFC destination parameters for the SAP source system in BW. To do this, choose Tools ® Administration ® Administration ® Network ® RFC Destinations in BW.
    Enter the information taken from the source system on the server name.
    u2022     Application server: pswdf090
    u2022     System ID: IDF
    u2022     System number: 90
    The destination name has to correspond to the logical name of the source system that you entered for the process step Define Logical System in the implementation guide for the source system. For user and password, enter the background user that you created in step 1.
    3.     Define the RFC destination parameters for the SAP BW in the source system. To do this, select Tools ® Administration ® Administration ® Network ® RFC Destinations in the source system. Enter the server name information taken from the BW system.
    The destination name has to correspond to the logical name of the BW system that you entered in the process step Define Logical System in the BW Customizing Implementation Guide. ALE communicates using the name of the SAP Business Information Warehouse that you defined. The defined name represents how the SAP Business Information Warehouse is identified. For the user and password, enter the background user that you defined in the BW Customizing Implementation Guide under Business Information Warehouse ® Links to Other Systems ® Link Between SAP Systems and BW.
    4.     Test both RFC destinations with the functions Test ® Connection and Test ® Authorization.
    If an error occurs during the authorization check, the background user is not permitted in this client and with this password. If an error occurs in the connection test, it means there is a network problem.
    5.     In the BW Administrator Workbench choose SOURCESYSTEMTREE ® Root ® Context Menu (right mouse button) ®Create and select the radio button for the manually creating an SAP source system.
    6.     Enter a description for the source system and the logical name of the source system that you entered for the process step Maintain Logical System in the source system implementation guide.
    If you still have any issues, let us know.
    Regards,
    Yogesh.

  • How to craete Source system in BW from R/3 box

    Hi,
    I requested to basis to create source system in bw with R/3 Box.they were created RFC connection and told me to create source system in the BW .
    Iam not sure how to create. please can any body help me in creating source system in BW with R/3 system.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    1.     You have made the following settings in the SAP Customizing Implementation Guide (transaction SPRO) under SAP NetWeaver ® SAP Business Information Warehouse  ® Links to Other Systems:
    ¡        General Connection Settings
    ¡        Links Between SAP Systems and BW
    ¡        Verify Workflow Customizing
           2.      You have made the following settings in the SAP Customizing Implementation Guide of the source system under the node SAP NetWeaver  ® SAP Web Application Server  ® IDoc Interface / Application Link Enabling (ALE) ® Basic Settings:
    u2022         Logical Systems
    -         Define Logical System
    -         Assign Logical System to Client
    u2022         Make basic settings for workflow (Perform Automatic Workflow Customizing)
    The name you used for the source system (logical system) has to be used again when creating the source system in the SAP BW Administrator Workbench.
           3.      You have taken the server name from the source system under Tools ® Administration ® Monitor ® System Monitoring ® Server.It is displayed as follows:
    Server_
    pswdf090_IDF_90
           4.      As a rule, system changes are not ever permitted in productive systems. However, connecting a system (as a source system) to an SAP BW, or connecting an SAP BW to a new source system, will require changes to the system change options. Therefore you have made sure that the following changes are allowed in the relevant clients for the system, when connecting to the source system:
    u2022         Cross-client Customizing and repository changes
    In the SAP Customizing Implementation Guide under SAP NetWeaver  ® SAP Business Information Warehouse  ® Links to Other Systems  ® General Connection Settings ® Assign Logical System to Client, select the relevant clients under Goto ® Details. In the Cross-Client Object Changes field, choose the Changes to Repository and Cross-Client Customizing Allowed option.
    In the source system, make the following settings in the SAP Customizing Implementation Guide under SAP NetWeaver  ® SAP  Web Application Server  ® IDoc Interface / Application Link Enabling (ALE) ® Basic Settings ® Cross-Application Components ® Distribution (ALE) ® Basic Settings ® Logical Systems ® Assign Logical System to Client.
    u2022         Changes to the local developments and Business Information Warehouse software components
    You use transaction SE03 (Transport Organizer Tools) to set the change options. Choose Transport Organizer Tools ® Administration ® Set System Change Option, then Execute. Make the following settings in the next screen.
    u2022         Changes to the customer name range.
    Again, you use transaction SE03 to set the change option for the customer name range.
    u2022         Changes to BW namespaces /BIC/ and /BI0/
    Again, you use transaction SE03 to set the change option for the BW namespaces.
    Thanks,
    Vinod
    Edited by: Vinod on Nov 26, 2009 10:54 AM

  • Is it normal for a BADI Implementation to be deactivated after an Upgrade?.

    We've upgraded CRM 7, bringing it right up to the latest version. However, I noticed some functionality that stopped working and after investigation noted that a BADI Implementation was Inactive, although was Active and working before the upgrade.
    Would you expect this to happen. I can see why it might if the BADI code had changed, but otherwise I always considered implementations as Z code, which they are, so should not be touched by anything that SAP do.
    Jason

    Jason,
    Only thing I can think of is that the generation of the object failed and thus it was put in an inactive state after an upgrade.  Normally I would agree that the BADI's should be active even after an upgrade(I have never had to reactivate them as far as I can remember).
    Take care,
    Stephen

  • How to recover a datasource from source system

    Dear Experts,
    i am trying to find a datasource(0PS_PRJTYPE_ATTR) in the source system. For some reason, I could only find the text one, not the attribute one. I checked in RSA5, RSA6 and RSA2. I couldn't find it.
    What are the possible ways to recover the datasource, not sure if someone has deleted it.
    Its really urgent, Please guide me.
    Regards
    Shanthi

    Hi,
    The same should be available in the source system (DEV), Surprising how / why the same is available in BW system.
    I checked the SAP ERP source system to which I have an access and the same is not available in the source system not in the BW system
    My sugession is to go for a generic datasource after identifying the table with the help of functional consultant.
    Regards
    Venkata Devaraj

  • Can we have SAP R/3 QAT system as source system  for BI dev

    HI ,
    We are doing SAP BI implementation and in our company we have already SAP R/3
    The problem is BI team is doing some development in BI DEV and they want to see some data.
    But unfortunately we don't have much data in DEV enviornment.
    So my question is can we have SAP R/3 QAT system as source system  for BI dev.
    Will there be any issues going forward.
    As per my understanding technically source system is just an RFC connection for BI, so we can point it to QAT as well.
    Do you guys foresee any issues in that?
    Thanks,
    Sumit

    Hello Sumit,
    What Arun said was what my concern was, he explained exactly the scenario that I faced, and that your BI team will face if you arrange your landscape as you said. 
    In my company for a while I had the BI Dev box connected to our ECC SND box.
    It was done that way because of the lack of data in ECC Dev.
    It worked, but it was definately not the best solution.  Today we have BID and ECC Dev connected, BIQ and ECC Q, and BIP and ECC Prd.  We do have data in teh attached ECC systems due to recent refreshes too, a large data set is very nice as it helps the BI team significantly.
    That is the best way to arrange the landscape (and throw a BI SND to ECC SND for the true best practice!)
    Thanks,
    Nick

  • Transfer rules are not exist for ECC Quality source system in BI Dev

    Hi,
    I Connected BI Dev system To ECC Dev and installed the sales, purchasing,... data flow, but here i am not getting the quality data to show the reports, to get Quality data  I established the connection between BI Dev and ECC QA, while installing the transfer rules for the ECC QA data sources there no transfer rules are exist(only some of them exist) in the business content, but all the update rules,... are exist, when i right on the data source say create transfer rules it is proposing App praposal.
    When i select source system as ECC dev while installing the transfer rules i can see all the transfer rules, but when i select source system as ECC QA i can see only some transfer rules.
    only problem with transfer rules(some of them exist), for remaining all objects are properly existing in business content for ECC QA source system.
    Regards,
    chandra

    Hi Fayzrakhmanov
    Thanks for the quick reply. We are not moving the stuff to QA. We are only connecting QA ECC system to BI Dev. We already have datasources moved to ECC QA and created source system for ECC QA in BI Dev.
    The problem is I am not able to get Business Content transful rule for new source system. We I can find some but not all unlike development.
    Help on this would be appreciated.
    Thanks

  • Identify the Source System in CRM BADI

    Hi,
    I need to write the code in ORDER_SAVE BADI in CRM based on the source system. For example, When i create the quotation in PCUI i need to validate few fields. Suppose i have created quotaton in R/3 and it gets transfer to CRM and i need validate few more fields.
    How do i findout in BADI whether the source system is PCUI or R/3? I have checked the SYST table but no difference in both the case. Anyother way to findout this.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Bala.c

    Hello Bala,
    In the ORDERADM_H structure of the CRM_ORDER_READ or in the CRMD_ORDERADM_H table you find a field called LOGICAL_SYSTEM. In that field the RFC destination of the source system (source system = where the order/transaction was created) will be stored.
    For PCUI this field will have the RFC destination of the CRM server itself.
    For R/3 it will have the RFC destination of the R/3 system.
    Hope this helps,
    Reward points if useful!
    Regards,
    Joost

  • Change source system in Dev

    Hi
    I have a dev system that is mapped to 2 source systems, R/3 clients (clients 245 and 246) and datasources are mapped to either of these systems.  One of these R/3 clients (245) has now been deleted and I want to convert all of the datasources that pointed to it to the new client (246).   I want to convert only the datasources pointing to the old client (245), but not change those that are already pointing to the new client (246).  Would BDLS help in this situation.
    Thanks in advance
    Simon

    you can do these:
    1 )  change in SM59, the source r/3 qlty to point to your dev server. That should do the trick without making a lot of changes. once you change the source system via this option, you have to perform a check/restore (so that the partner profile in dev system can be updated), replication and activation of the transfer structures.
    2) You can also ask your BASIS guy to run program for BDLS that changes the system pointer.

  • Source System inactive in Quality

    Hi Experts,
    I need to load the data from flat file to ods but my source system is inactive in Quality server when i double click on source system it is not showing any active button in quality server, but the same source system is active in development server.
    Please can any one solve my problem.
    Many Thanks in advance
    David

    Hi Srinivas,
    Thanks for your answer, and one of my source system is still inactive for this i follow the below steps,
    1) Run the program in se 38 RS_TRANSTRU_ACTIVATE_ALL
    2) RSA1- source system_ right click on source system - activate..
    but still my source system is inactive so how can i solve my problem... please give me solution.
    Daivd

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error code -50

    I've recently created a music video on imovie '09. The problem is, I can't share or export the movie. Every time I try to, it says "Unable to prepare project for publishing.The project could not be prepared for publishing because an error occurred. (

  • Mac interruption due to phototocartoon plug in

    My mac connection gets interrupted and I get an error message that it's due to phototocartoon plug in.  Has anyone had this problem or know how to resolve.  When I try to send info to Apple I get another error message stating the info cannot send and

  • Regarding Search Help Exit

    I am having a problem in Search help exit. Currently we have a search help “Z_srchlp”. In the Selection method of this search help we have a Help view “z_view”. In this view we have a join on Tables KNA1 and KNVV. But now the requirement is to fetch

  • TS3988 I had a document e mailed to me via e mail, document contained 2 pages,  I can only retrieve 1 page.How do I retrieve the 2nd page?

    I had a document e mailed to me that contained 2 pages, but can only retrieve 1 page, how do scroll so I can get the 2nd page?

  • CS4 feature query

    Does the sixth version of InDesign finally remember print settings properly? That is, it remembers range but resets quantity to 1. It's getting awfully frustrating (even for Adobe) that they keep changing it, and it keeps getting worse.