BAM Error on BizTalk 2009

Hello All,
while deploying BAM, i am getting the below error.
What might be the issue?
Microsoft.BizTalk.Bam.Management.BamManagerException: The BAM deployment failed. ---> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Invalid index name 'NCI_ActivityID' (should start with NCUI_ for Unique+Non-Clustered indexes).
parashuram
just one more info, before this i had removed view, activity and then tracking profile respetive order.
i understand the the order of the removal is not correct however there should be some way to come out of this issue.

Well you say you removed them, which to me implies that you ran the appropriate "bm" commands. IMHO after having removed the view and activity (which is the correct sequence BTW) removal of TP should have warned you about the missing activity during
load.
Anyways, I suggest you use the bm list-activities and bm list-views to confirm that they have been removed. If you have the deployment file, I'd recommend using the bm remove-all -DefinitonFile:..... and carefully examine the output to ensure that the Activity
has indeed been removed.
Secondly ensure that your DefinitonFile has been generated using the appropriate and supported combination of Excel and the BAM Plug-in.
Regards.

Similar Messages

Visual Studio 2008 with BizTalk 2009 Missing Assembly Reference - Developing under Windows7

I'm having a similar issue to this....> http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/2df94010-5755-4982-a02d-81f8feb51fda/visual-studio-2008-with-biztalk-2009-missing-assembly-reference?forum=biztalkgeneral
Prior to going to Win7, I was developing on a Win-XP machine. I used to delete the generated code and have VS generate it again, but no luck. I get errors in the Build, similar to what shows in the Message Assignment shape in the orc. It's complaining about
a missing part of a Multi-part message. Oh, and the Multi-part message is a schema created in VS2005/BizTalk2006 R2, which was created on a separate Win-XP machine.
Just wondering if anyone has come up with a fix to this? The previously documented entry did not seem to have a solution.
Thanks.

Jeff,
Do you see your_orchestration.odx.cs ?
If you do Can you try as following:
1. Take backup of whole solution
2. Delete all .cs files associated with biztalk artifacts, like odx.cs, xsd.cs, btm.cs
3. Open orchestration and in any one of the expression shape copy all statements.
4. Click OK to close the Expression window.
5. Build the solution. (you should get errors)
6. Goto expression and paste code.
7. Build
This has worked for me in past. May be it will work for you too.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful.

Biztalk 2009 WCF adapter

I'm trying to process a file using wcf custom adapter 64 bit on Biztalk 2009. The sql server that is receiving this file is SQL server 2005 enterprise edition SP 3 and 32 bit machine.
I'm dropping the file in the receive location and it gets picked up but then the file disappears and no row count in sql inbound table.
I checked the application log on Biztalk and SQL server and there are no errors.
Any idea?

Yes it will make sure your new server is picking up the file.
Once done, follow the steps bellow:
1. Go to your receive location and point URI to new location
2. Go to your receive port --> Go to tracking tab and enable all 4 tracking options
3. Restart the host instances
4. Place the file in the new receive location (file should disappear)
5. Now go to BizTalk Group Hub --> Tracked Message Events
6. There should be two rows against your receive port (one for Receive and one for Send)
By double clicking the rows you can see what was received on the port and what was sent by this port.
At this stage, you will find your message in Active Messages or Suspended Messages.
You can also monitor the Event Viewer for errors or warnings meanwhile.
BizTalk Specialist

BizTalk 2009 SQL WCF Adapter Losing Messages? AKA TypedPolling Not Working

Can anybody help me with this amazingly frustrating issue? Firstly, the basiscs. I'm using BizTalk 2009 Standard Edition hosted on Windows Server 2008
Standard (64 bit). The BizTalk databases are stored on a seperate server, running SQL Server 2008 on Windows Server 2008 Enterprise (64 bit).
I have configured a WCF SQL adapter to poll (using TypedPolling) a SQL 2008 database which in turn activates a relatively simple orchestration. The problem
is that the orchestration does not get executed at the specified polling intervals. I have several other similar polling adapters in my application that work
as expected. Generally it will run correctly once or twice after enabling/disabling the receive location or restarting the host instance. But after that it
is completely erratic. If I have it set to run every hour (3600 secs), it might complete succssfully once or twice a day at seemingly random times. On other
days it might run seven or eight times during a day.
I've spent heaps of time reading blogs and changing various settings on my receive location and have really run out of ideas. I've profiled SQL Server and it
seems that the WCF SQL adapter does hit the database at each polling period as specified, using both the polledDataAvailableStatement and the
pollingStatement. Data is always returned by these queries (a small amount - around 30 records), but they just don't seem to get to the message box. No
errors are ever reported in the Event Log.
I use a stored procedure for determining if data is available and for returning data. They are both effectively the same statement, one returns a count
whilst the other returns the data. The queries are using cross server joins as you can see below. Although I do no updates, it seems that I have to run the
receive location with AmbientTransactions turned on. Turning them off just results in a SQL Timeout exception. I don't understand why this is and would be
grateful if someone could explain.
Data Available (contained in a stored proc):
SELECT COUNT(*)
    FROM    [LMNZLSQL002\AX].[LMNZ_AX_LIVE].[dbo].[CRM_CUSTTRANS_ITG] WITH (NOLOCK)
    WHERE    (TRANSTYPE = 8 OR TRANSTYPE = 13)
    AND SETTLEAMOUNTCUR > 0
    AND CUSTFEEINVOICETRANSACTION30005 IS NOT NULL
    AND CUSTFEEINVOICETRANSACTION30005 <> ''
    AND CUSTFEEINVOICETRANSACTION30005 IN
        SELECT F.FeeId
        FROM [dbo].[Fees] F WITH (NOLOCK)
        WHERE F.FeeStatus = 3        --Unpaid
        AND F.Payer IS NOT NULL
Select Data (contained in a stored proc):
SELECT ACCOUNTNUM, CUSTFEEINVOICETRANSACTION30005, AMOUNTCUR, SETTLEAMOUNTCUR
    FROM    [LMNZLSQL002\AX].[LMNZ_AX_LIVE].[dbo].[CRM_CUSTTRANS_ITG] WITH (NOLOCK)
    WHERE    (TRANSTYPE = 8 OR TRANSTYPE = 13)
    AND SETTLEAMOUNTCUR > 0
    AND CUSTFEEINVOICETRANSACTION30005 IS NOT NULL
    AND CUSTFEEINVOICETRANSACTION30005 <> ''
    AND CUSTFEEINVOICETRANSACTION30005 IN
        SELECT F.FeeId
        FROM [dbo].[Fees] F WITH (NOLOCK)
        WHERE F.FeeStatus = 3        --Unpaid
        AND F.Payer IS NOT NULL
    ORDER BY ACCOUNTNUM,CUSTFEEINVOICETRANSACTION30005
At one time I suspected that the issue may be related to database locking. So, as you can see, I've added NOLOCK locking hints to rule this out. I'm also
using a Service Behaviour (SqlAdapterInboundTransactionBehaviour) declaring a transaction level of ReadUncommitted. Obviousy I'd like to move away from the
possibility of dirty reads. Also, I've checked the SQL activity monitors when I expect the process to run and can see no locks holding it up. Also, I can
freely execute the stored procedures from SQL Management Studio at these times.
I'm not too experienced at monitoring BizTalk, but I wondered if some kind of throttling was occuring. So I've moved the receive location (and the
orchestration that doesn't always get initiated) to its own host instance and have done some monitoring via the performance counters in perfmon. I haven't
spotted any thottling going on, but maybe I wasn't looking at the correct counters (mainly used the Message Agent items).
Here's a summary of the receive location properties:
Transport: WCF-Custom
Receive Handler: AXPaymentsToFeesEngine (this host instance only hosts this receive location and the orchestration it should be activating).
Receive pipeline: XmlReceive
General tab:
EndpointAddress: mssql://lmnzlsql003/CRM/FeesEngine?InboundId=PaidInAXUnpaidInFeesEngine
Endpoint Identity - all default values
Binding Tab:
Binding Type: sqlBinding
allowIdentityInsert: False
batchSize: 20
chunkSize: 4194304
enableBizTalkCompatibilityMode: True
enablePerformanceCounters: False
encrypt: False
inboundOperationType: TypedPolling
maxConnectionPoolSize: 100
notificationStatement: Not specified
notifyListenersOnStart: True
polledDataAvailableStatement: EXEC [dbo].[bts_PollForAXFeePaymentsNotPresentInFeesEngine_IsDataAvailable]
polledIntervalInSeconds: 3600
pollingStatement: EXEC [dbo].[bts_GetFeesMarkedUnpaidThatHaveBeenPaidInAX]
pollWhileDataFound: False
UseAmbientTransaction: True
useDatabaseNameInXsdNamespace: False
workstationId: Not specified
xmlStoredProcedureRootNodeName: Not specified
xmlStoredProcedureRootNodeNamespace: Not specified
All timeouts: 5 mins.
Behaviour Tab
ServiceBehaviour - sqlAdapterInboundTransactionBehaviour, ReadUncommitted, timeout mins
Other Tab:
Credentials: None
Preserve message order: False
Mesages Tab:
Inbound BizTalk message body: Body
Error handling: All disabled
Thanks in advance,
Mark

Thanks everyone for your input on this. None of the suggestions actually seemed to solve our specific issue, and we ended up raising a support call with Microsoft. They got us to use some tracing tools that are not publically available and it turns out that
there was a problem with the underlying WCF commnications channel, which was not visible via the usual windows event logs. They suggested a solution that, although very counter-intuitive, seems to have resolved our problem; set the ReceiveTimeout property
of the receive adapter to 
24.20:31:23.6470000 and restart the service host.
Here's the underlying exception:

[0]1E2C.21C4::07/07/2010-4:52:25.804 [CSharp]:[Wcf] BtsErrorHandler.HandleError called with Exception: System.ServiceModel.CommunicationObjectAbortedException:
The communication object, System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel, cannot be used for communication because it has been Aborted.
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.CommunicationObject.ThrowIfDisposedOrImmutable()
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.CommunicationObject.Open(TimeSpan timeout)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.CommunicationObject.Open()
   at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ChannelHandler.InitializeServiceChannel(ServiceChannel channel)
   at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ChannelHandler.GetSessionChannel(Message message, EndpointDispatcher& endpoint, Boolean& addressMatched)
   at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ChannelHandler.EnsureChannelAndEndpoint(RequestContext request)
   at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ChannelHandler.TryRetrievingInstanceContext(RequestContext request).

Getting BAM Error: BAM-06008: The XML payload is invalid; extra contents we

Hi All,
Version: 11.1.1.4
We are getting the BAM Error: "BAM-06008: The XML payload is invalid; extra contents were found" after I added a another field to a BAM Object. I can see the new field in BAM and I can also see it when I pull up and map to a BAM adapter in my SOA composite. However, when I have the process send a payload with the newly added field it fails with the above error. However, if I add a new data object in BAM with the field it works fine. What would be causing BAM to think that the newly added field should be in payload?
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
--S

If the layout of the data object changes then you need to restart BAM server for changes to take effect. Also make sure, your mapper file isn't adding extra elements than expected.
Thanks
Jahangir Pasha

Biztalk 2009 with WCF adapter running on 64 bit

Hi experts,
I'm running a wcf adapter 64 bit send handler/host on biztalk 2009. Will it work? or does it require the adapter to be configured on 32 bit?

The WCF bindings are supported in 64-bit Host Instances.

Posting only posisble error in periods 2009/08 and 2009/07 in company code

Hi Experts,
When my user do GI for this month he got error as mentioned below,
Posting only possible error in periods 2009/08 and 2009/07 in company code
Already i have done it but still am not confident.
Also this particular corrections i need to do it in Production system
Please guide which month i need to enter 1st in MMPV,request you to explain step by step.
Cheers,
Kumar.S

Hi,
Check in T.code: MMRV and see which period is open for ur Co.Code and back posting is allowed or not.
In MMPV open period 09 with your company code.
Note-1: Check Fiscal Period Variant in OBY6..........is it K4.
Note-2: From FI side check or Now use t.code: OB52 and open the 09, 2009 period in Account Types A, K, D,M, S and specially Account Type u201C+u201D which stands for valid for all accounts type and save. Better consult FICO consultant for OB52 step.
Regards,
Biju K

BAM Error - during the creation of BAM Activity and View in EXCEL

I'm getting an error "The Cube could not be created successfully. Please edit the view and validate the inputs" during the creation of BAM Activity and VIEW in MS Excel for BAM
Error Details:
Error Description:
The following system error occurred: Invalid class string .
Error Source:
Microsoft OLE DB Provider for Analysis Services 2008.
Please help me in resolving the issue. Thanks in Advance!!

Hi Ramesh,
Below link has the information related to all the prerequisites for using BAM Add-In for Excel.
Kindly ensure that you have all the files in place before creating BAM Activity and View.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa560476.aspx
Rachit
Please mark it as Answer if this answers your question

Commerce Server 2009 and BizTalk 2009

Hi,
Just a simple question. Will CS2009 work with BizTalk 2009? Are the adapter compatible? Where can I find the documentation for this?
Regards
MagnusMagnus

We are currently working an implementation of this, and haven't found any issues, however there is no documentation that i have found yet.
I would read this, and follow here...
http://blogs.msdn.com/commerce/archive/2009/06/15/biztalk-2006-r2.aspx

Migrating From BizTalk 2009 To Biztalk server 2013

Hi All,
My current solution is on BizTalk 2009 and my client is thinking of migrating to BizTalk 2013 . Please suggest me is it a good idea to migrate to BizTalk 2013.
Please provide me a difference between 2009 to 2013
Difference between 2009 to 2013 and main features.
Thanks and Regards
Dhanavel S

Hi Dhanavel,
Why don’t you think about migrating to BizTalk 2013 R2 which is available now. Anyway
First and foremost thing, BizTalk Server 2009’s mainstream support from Microsoft has ended on 08-July-2014. After mainstream support, customer will get extended support until
09-July-2019. So you're are in extended support phase now. Find out the following blogpost where you will know more about what you can get and what you’re going to miss from Microsoft support for BizTalk Server 2009. And also about what you have to do next.
Why you have to migrate to the latest version.
BizTalk Server 2009 mainstream support ends.What to do next?
Apart from losing the benefits of mainstream support against the extended support and apart from getting the benefits of latest offering/features of the newer version of the
product, BizTalk server 2009 is closely dependent on its underlying platforms like Windows Server 2008 (or Window server 2003/Windows XP-SP3/Windows Visa SP1), SQL Server 2008 (or SQL Server 2005 SP2) and Visual Studio 2008. So its high time to migrate.
BizTalk Server 2009 mainstream support ends. What to do next?
Some of the benefits of migrating from BizTalk 2009 to BizTalk 2013.
Platform upgrades:
BizTalk 2013 uses following, so when you upgrade from BizTalk 2009 to 2013, you will get the benefits by upgrading your platforms.
Windows Server 2012 (BizTalk 2009 uses Windows Server 2009)
Visual Studio 2012(BizTalk 2009 uses Visual Studio2008)
.NET Framework 4.5 (BizTalk 2009 uses .NET 3.5)
SQL Server 2012(BizTalk 2009 uses SQL 2008)
Virtualization support for Hyper-V (this feature is available from BizTalk 2010 onwards)
Some of the other benefits include
Better support to could
Azure Service Bus. And support for
BizTalk Server running on Azure IaaS
BizTalk Server 2013 Support for RESTful Services
More support towards WCF-based adpaters.
Secure FTP with new FTPS Adapter and an improved FTP Adapter
Out-of-box support to SFTP Adapter
Enhancements to the IBM Hosts Systems adapters
Update to BizTalk mapper
Updated Trading Partner Management (TPM) Capabilities.
Updates to industry schemas like HIPPA, HL7, SWIFT and SWIFTNet
Seamless ability to leverage BizTalk capabilities from SharePoint 2010 Business Connectivity Service to Line-of-Business systems
BizTalk Server setting dashboard for setting to
configuring the key performance, throttling, and tracking settings of your entire BizTalk group while offering fine grained control all the way down to the Host
Instance level.
ESB toolkit part of BizTalk installation.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

BizTalk monitoring BizTalk 2004 Vs BizTalk 2009

Does anyone know if this article also applies to BizTalk 2006 and BizTalk 2009 since it was written in 2005?
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms942197%28v=bts.10%29.aspx
Thanks

Hi,
Here are the more recent links on the monitoring details:
BizTalk Server 2006 R2: Monitoring the BizTalk Server Environment
BizTalk Server 2009: Monitoring the BizTalk Server Environment
Though the document you are referring to still holds good except the minor changes like removal of HAT in BizTalk 2009, its worth mentioning about the major advancements done in automating the needs of BizTalk monitoring with the introduction of many automated
tools like SCOM (MOM was available in BT 2004), BizTalk 360, now BHM and etc.
Refer the link for available monitoring tools:
BizTalk Monitoring Tools
Rachit
Please mark as answer or vote as helpful if my reply does

Disable EDI validations in BizTalk 2009

Hi,
I have a requirement to disable EDI validations in BizTalk 2009. The requirement is to capture and store the XML messages that will be used to render the CMS1500 or UB04 claim forms later on. I was thinking to have a very basic pipeline with EDI Disassembler,
turn off the validation properties and a send port that subscribes to the XML message generated by the receive pipeline. Since the TP agreement takes precedence over the EDI Disassembler pipeline component properties, my 837 file is failing in the receive
pipeline for syntax. Unfortunately I can't disable EDI Validation at the Party level since the party setup is used by the production process that sends claims to the mainframe system. Even with EDI validation turned off, I read that there are still some validations
that is performed. Is there a way to completely turn off EDI validation? In other words turn off SNIP Level 1 and 2 validations? Failed message routing is not an option since it routes entire Transaction set with the failed message. Any better options available
to achieve my requirement? Really appreciate some guidance on this.
Thanks.

Thank you for the reply, boatseller. If a message fails syntax in production, 999 is generated and send out to the TP. But there are some small shops/individual providers who directly submit claims to the Payer. These small shops may not to know to how to
interpret a -ve 999. So we need to report back to them on a paper claim. That's why the need to capture and store the XML message.
Were you leaning towards subscribing to the failed messages in production? There could be multiple claims with in a given ST. Won't the failed message include the entire transaction set, even if there is only one bad claim? Worse case scenario, I was thinking
about having a custom schema with all enumerations and length requirements relaxed. I think that requires a separate path, correct?

How To convert BizTalk 2009 Web Services(Receive Locations) to 2013 WebServices ??

Hi ,
We are actually going to migrate from BizTalk 2009 to BizTalk 2013 . As a part of this i want to convert all current BizTalk Artifacts to get compatibly with BizTalk 2013. I was able to convert schemas , maps , Orchestration etc to .net 4.5 directly
via Visual Studio 2012 Conversion Wizard. But for BizTalk Rcv Location WebServices (.asmx and .svc) , i was not able to do the same. Could anyone give some insight on how to migrate the Rcv Location during the migration from BizTalk 2009 to BizTalk 2013.
Abhijith

well i guess you need not to re expose the schema, i am not pretty sure though. Because your code relies on .net 2.0 and you are moving it to higher version 4.5, it should work.
So only changes in apppool settings and if required, changes on web.config file for runtime version property will do.
well i am not pretty sure though, just try and trouble shoot it.
Please mark the post as answer if this answers your question. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Biztalk 2009 application to Biztalk 2013 application

Hi all,
I have a Biztalk 2009 application that I moved to Biztalk 2013. It only consist of send port (wcf custom adapter), receive port, receive location (file adapter) and a party agreement.
The issue that I have is processing the file to sql server using WCF custom adapter. Does the store procedure has to be different in Biztalk 2013 in order to process files? or can it be the same as configured in Biztalk 2009?
Christiane

Hi,
Test also your Maps because in a BizTalk 2013 map a method must return something when it is invoked and can not return null.
“Extension functions cannot return null values.” Exception when running a map in BizTalk 2013
http://www.ithero.nl/post/2013/06/19/Extension-functions-cannot-return-null-values-Exception-when-running-a-map-in-BizTalk-2013.aspx
Kind regards,
Tomasso Groenendijk
Blog
| Twitter
MCTS BizTalk Server 2006, 2010
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly

Developing for BizTalk 2009 and BizTalk 2013 on the same box

I currently have Visual Studio 2008 installed and setup on my local machine for doing BizTalk 2009 development. We are migrating to BTS 2013 soon.
I also have Visual Studio 2013 installed (but no BizTalk 2013 components installed). Will I be able to develop for both versions of BizTalk on the same box?
Has anyone successfully done this?
My machine is Windows 7 Professional, 64 bit. And I have also installed BTS 2009, Developer edition as well.

Hi Chris,
I don't think BTS 2009 and BTS 2013 (or for that matter any two versions of BizTalk) can be installed on the same OS. MS SQL Server and Visual Studio cannot
distinguish which instance is started. Use Microsoft Virtual Server instead.
Rachit
Please mark as answer or vote as helpful if my reply does

BAM Error on BizTalk 2009

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for