BAPI to post a Goods issue with relation to Sales Order?

Hi Everyone,
After creating a delivery order, I need a BAPI to automatically post a goods issue for this DO.
I tried using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE but it returns the message 'Goods Movement not possible with mvmt type 601'.
Any advice?
Best Regards,
Junwen

Hi John,
My data are as follows:
GOODSMVT HEADER:
PSTNG_DATE: 30.09.2004
DOC_DATE: 30.09.2004
REF_DOC_NO: had tried 1014000359 or empty
GOODSMVT_CODE: 03
GOODSMVT_ITEM:
MATERIAL: HP0121002
PLAN: 1010
STGE: 10FG
BATCH: BATCH1
MOV: 601
CUSTOMER: 180017
ENTRY_QNT: 1
ENT_UOM: PC
ENT_UOM_ISO: PC
DELIV_NUMB: 1014000359
DELIV_ITEM: 000001
From your feedback, it is possible to use the BAPI to create a goods issue for movement type 601?
Best Regards,
Junwen

Similar Messages

Goods Issue with reference to Purchase Order

Hi MM Gurus,
Is there any settings to do Goods Issue with reference to Purchase order?
I want to capture the material price in purchase order during goods issue instead of standard price or moving average price.
Thanks in advance
Dinesh

Hello Dinesh,
Batch valuation is similar to split valuation. Here is the link on how batch valuation works.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/25/283db54f7811d18a150000e816ae6e/content.htm
Please check in sandbox environment before using.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Goods Receipt with respect to sales order

hi,
goods receipt with respect to sales order ,that sales order is prepared with reference to quotation
erroer is
Account assignment cannot be carried out because of different origin no.
Message no. V1134
Diagnosis
The sales document to which you want to refer is based on sales document 20000005 and item 000010. Therefore, the settlement and possibly inventory management are carried out using the number of the preceding document.
System Response
This entry is not allowed.
Procedure
Enter the document and the item number of the preceding sales document

Hi,
Refer the sales quotation number for GR instead of the sales order number.
Regards,
Ravi Kumar C.

Error when posting an goods issue of movement type 501: order not contain

I tried to post an goods issue of movment type 501 to a stock transport order. But I get the error as below.
Document 4500000130 does not contain any selectable items
Message no. M7 064
Diagnosis
The document or item entered cannot be adopted.
Possible reasons for this are:
The document items have already been processed
(Suggest zero lines indicator set?).
the document items have been deleted or are blocked.
the document items have been created for a different plant.
(for reservations only) movements are not yet allowed for the reservation items.
(for reservations only) the document items are retrograde components of the order. These are posted using the order confirmations.
The document is an R/2 document.
Procedure
Make sure your entries are correct.
If the system has already processed the total quantity, you can set the Suggest zero lines indicator. The system will suggest the quantity zero for the items that have already been processed.
If you have entered a particular item, cancel the item. If you do not enter an item, the system searches all of the open items in the document.
If the document is a purchase order, production order or a reservation, you can enter search criteria in the dialog box.
You access the dialog box by choosing the menu option Enter with reference on the initial screen.
If the document is an R/2 document, you have to cancel it manually by entering the reversal movement type.
How can I proceed to post?
Thanks,
Eda

Hi
Go to T.code MB1A, enter the required movement type, Plant and storage location and then click,
The push button of Reservation on the tool bar for refereing the reservation or
The push button of order on the tool bar for refereing the Production order.
Cheers
Kris

Goods issue to customer without sales order or Outbound delivery

Dear all gurus,
I have a case like that: Supposing we don't have neither Sales Order nor Outbound Delivery (because not implement SD, for eg).
Then, we stil want goods issue to customer. So can u advise me how to do: which Tcode, which movement type,...
Thanks,

Hi,
Create a cost center for customer and issue the goods with respect to this cost center in MB1A transaction using movement type 201.
Then all the issues will be tracked based on this cost center.
Regards,
Bharat

Issue with creation of sales order in CRM system

Hi Experts,
Here are the details of the process we followed
1.     We found a Function Module u201CBAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTIu201D which is used to create a sales order in CRM.
2.     We have set a Break point in the FM u201CCRM_ORDER_MAINTAINu201D and tried to create a sales order using the transaction u201CCRMD_ORDERu201D. For this the parameters we have given are
a.     sold-to-party
b.     ship-to-party
c.     quantity
d.     product
And after this we have saved the order and the order is saved and in the debug mode we have the parameters in u201CCRM_ORDER_MAINTAINu201D and we found all these     parameters in the FM.
3.     After this we have given all the parameters mentioned above in the FM u201CBAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTIu201D and still the order is not created, gave an error message saying that CRM_ORDER: Incorrect values in the interface object.
4.     We checked the CRM_ORDER badiu2019s interface and it is having only header guid to be given. We gave this header guid also in the FM u201CBAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTIu201D and then it gave a different error saying that : Document cannot be saved.
5.     Finally we are not able to know the parameters to be passed to the FM to create an order.
Any inputs will be highly appreciated.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Lakshman.

Hi Easwar,
Now i am able to create a sales order by passing the parameters to "BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI" and the parameters i am passing are Process_type in the ORDERADM_H, parner_fct (partner function), partner_no , Quantity and prod_ordered (product name) but after creation of sales order using my report program and if i see the sales order uisng transaction crmd_order (using transaction ID) or crmd_orderadm_h(using headerguid) or crm_order_index, only the PROCESS_TYPE is updated but the remaining parameters which i passed like QUANTITY,PRODUCT NAME,PARTNER NUMBER are not present in the sales order. I am providing the code which i have written for creation of the sales order. Can you please look into it and tell me where i might have went wrong??
*& Report ZCREATEORDER_TEST
REPORT ZCREATEORDER_TEST.
DATA : LV_HEADER_GUID TYPE GUID_32,
WA_HEADER            TYPE         BAPIBUS20001_HEADER_INS,
ITAB_HEADER          TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIBUS20001_HEADER_INS,
ITAB_CREATED_PROCESS TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIBUS20001_HEADER_INS,
ITAB_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIBUS20001_GUID_DIS,
ITAB_PARTNER        TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIBUS20001_PARTNER_INS,
lt_product_i TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIBUS20001_ITEM,
wa_product_i type BAPIBUS20001_ITEM,
lt_schedlin_i type standard table of BAPIBUS20001_SCHEDLIN,
wa_schedlin_i type BAPIBUS20001_SCHEDLIN,
ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS TYPE TABLE OF bapibus20001_input_fields,
ls_inputfields TYPE bapibus20001_input_fields,
WA_PARTNER          TYPE BAPIBUS20001_PARTNER_INS,
ITAB_RETURN          TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIRET2,
WA_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE LIKE LINE OF ITAB_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE,
           "To store the Objects to be saved.
WA_CREATED_PROCESS LIKE LINE OF ITAB_CREATED_PROCESS,
ITAB_SAVED_OBJECTS   TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIBUS20001_OBJECT_ID,
WA_SAVED_OBJECTS    LIKE LINE OF ITAB_SAVED_OBJECTS,
GC_X type c.
gc_x = 'x'.
CALL FUNCTION 'GUID_CREATE'
IMPORTING
    ev_guid_32 = lv_header_guid.
CLEAR : WA_HEADER.
Passing the respective values from the Header table to internal table.
WA_HEADER-GUID          = LV_HEADER_GUID.
WA_HEADER-PROCESS_TYPE = 'ZTA'.
APPEND WA_HEADER TO ITAB_HEADER.
*Appending the values to the ITAB_HEADER.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'ORDERADM_H'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'PROCESS_TYPE'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
*ls_inputfields-ref_handle = '0000000000'.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'ORDERADM_H'.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'MODE'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'ORDERADM_H'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'GUID'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
CHANGES MADE
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'SCHEDLIN'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'LOGICAL_KEY'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'SCHEDLIN'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'MODE'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'SCHEDLIN_I'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'GUID'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
   ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'SCHEDLIN_I'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'QUANTITY'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
   ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'SCHEDLIN_I'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'MODE'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
CHANGES MADE
WA_PARTNER-REF_GUID = LV_HEADER_GUID.
WA_PARTNER-REF_KIND = 'A'.
giving the partner function and partner no 000000038 for slod to party
WA_PARTNER-PARTNER_FCT = '00000038'.
WA_PARTNER-PARTNER_NO = '10017'.
APPEND WA_PARTNER TO ITAB_PARTNER.
*"ADDING VALUES for the product
wa_product_i-header        = lv_header_guid.
wa_product_i-handle        = '0000000001'.
wa_product_i-ordered_prod = '12000014'.
wa_product_i-mode          = 'A'.
APPEND wa_product_i TO lt_product_i.
*"ADDING VALUES for quantity
wa_schedlin_i-quantity   = 30.
wa_schedlin_i-handle = 1.
APPEND wa_schedlin_i TO lt_schedlin_i.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'PARTNER'.
*ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'REF_GUID'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'PARTNER'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'PARTNER_FCT'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'PARTNER'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'PARTNER_NO'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI'
TABLES
    HEADER          = ITAB_HEADER
    ITEM            = lt_product_i
    RETURN          = ITAB_RETURN
    PARTNER         = ITAB_PARTNER
    INPUT_FIELDS    = ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS
    CREATED_PROCESS = itab_created_process
    SCHEDULELINE    = lt_schedlin_i.
READ TABLE ITAB_CREATED_PROCESS INTO WA_CREATED_PROCESS WITH KEY GUID = LV_HEADER_GUID BINARY SEARCH.
WA_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE-GUID = WA_CREATED_PROCESS-GUID.
Appending the Guid of the contract to be saved to the internal table
APPEND WA_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE TO ITAB_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_SAVE'
EXPORTING
    update_task_local = space
    save_frame_log    = GC_X
TABLES
    objects_to_save   = itab_objects_to_save
    saved_objects     = itab_saved_objects
    return            = itab_return.
Calling the Standard BAPI to Commit the transcation.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'.
I have debugged the above code, all the values are passing are passing to the FM "'BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI'" and these passed to the CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN and then to CRM_ORDER_READ which are called inside the "'BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI'". Finally the sales order is created but not able to see all the values that i am passing except PROCESS_TYPE.
Thanks a lot in Advance,
Lakshman.

Good Issue date in the Sales order should 1 day difference from the MBDAT

For the particular customer, i want to have difference of 1 day in between the material availability date & good issue date in the schedule line. As per standard i can't made any changes in route and shipping point. Suppose material availability date in sales order is 22.09.2010 than my good issue date should be 23.09.2010 in the sales order. Any body having any idea how can we handle this case and what are things we need consider impact of this change.
Regards,
Srinivas.

Hi,
I think you can easily enable this in Route scheduling /Delivery scheduling. You have to maintain the load time and pick/pack time as the total of 8hours. If this is done, then after material availability date, one more day will be added and the final day will be considered as GI date.
If you dont want to do this, you only have to enable this by Z by using a user exit where you can add one day to the MBDAT and update that in GI date.

Issue with the Internal sales Order

Hi
We are trying to populate the customer information in the internal sales orders.
We are updating the Customer_ID, Customer_Number, Customer_name information on the iface header table...and we are submitting the Order Import concurrent program...even though customer information is not populated....
Could any one sggest on this....
Regards,
Krishna

Why are you updating the interface record?
You create and approve an internal requisition (IR)
You run the "Create Internal Orders" concurrent program.
This program reads the IR details and populates the Order Interface table.
Then you run the "Import Orders" concurrent request.
That program processes the interface record and creates the Internal Sales Order (ISO). All the information Oracle needs to create the ISO (such as customer name, number etc.) is already in the interface table or is derived by the Import Orders program. You should NOT update the information.
Hope this helps,
Sandeep Gandhi

Bapi for partial good issue with ref to reservation

I have check the bapi for goods issue with ref to reservation. But how to take care scenario where good issue qty is less than reservation qty. How to map this in bapi.
Please provide input its urgent
Thanks
JENA

Hi Jena,
Implement a check in your program calling BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE.
If you call BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE in your own program you have to fill the interface of it (GOODSMVT_HEADER, GOODSMVT_ITEM ...).
So in the first step you have to select/colect all the required data for the interface. If you want to post a goods-issue with
reference to a reservation you can implement a quantity-check in you own program similar to the checks in transaction MB1A or transaction MIGO which lead to message M7064. All the required informations are stored in the table "RESB - Items of reservation".
This is the quantity-check implemented in transaction MIGO (... see note 409754):
Take only reservation items with open quantity > 0 or
   or flag 'propose all items' is set (->default settings)
     l_open_quantity = ls_resitem-bdmng - ls_resitem-enmng.   >(1)
     CHECK l_open_quantity > 0 OR
            s_defaults-propose_all_items = abap_true.
l_open_quantity = open quantity -> is calulated here
ls_resitem-bdmng = Requirement Quantity ->
                    table RESB / field BDMNG
ls_resitem-enmng = Quantity withdrawn ->
                    table RESB / field ENMNG
Furthermore you could check, whether the quantity you want to post now is larger than the (remaining) open quantity. If this
not the case you could add this item to the interface-data. Otherwise you can ignore it and send a corresponding message or add the item to an error-log.
After the check has been carried out and the interface has been filled with the valid items you can call BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE.
In the customizing-transaction OMCQ you can maintain the category of messages. If you set the message M7 362 to the category "E - error message" the BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE will return with   this (error-)message as soon as the requirement quantity is exceeded by the goods-issue("Reserved quantity exceeded by ...").
But: other processes/applications are using these settings too.
This means: these processes/applications might have a different behaviour after your changes (error-message instead of a warning- message ... for example).
I hope this helps,
Elaine.

Post Goods Issue with BAPI with reference to BOM

Hi All,
I want to post Goods Issue with BAPI / FM with reference to BOM.
The requirement is like to replicate what we can do with MB1A with reference to BOM with BAPI / FM.
Please give ur suggestions.
Thanks in advance.
Chintan.

https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/advancedsearch?cat=sdn_forums_rm&query=kanban&adv=false&sortby=cm_rnd_rankvalue&sortmode=true&searchmode=similar&similardocsuri=/forumsrm/1_category/42_category/50_forum/34196_thread/322837_message

Post a good issue against an outbound delivery with movement type 601 K

Hello,
according to my business scenario I need to manage the stock of different vendors into the client's location (plant) at storage location level and I need to post the good issue against an outbound delivery to decrease the stock level.
Since the owner of the goods isn't my client the item is managed only at quantity level (not value) so I'm not interesed in the accounting document.
To do it I'm using the functionality related to the vendor consignment stock but I'm not able to post the good issue against an outbound delivery using the movemement type 601 and the special stock indicator equal to K.
In particular I've tried in two different ways:
- setup the consignment stock indicator (= K) into the sales item category, but when I post the goods issue the system is not able to find out the right vendor
- to create a stock determination rule instead of the setting previous described, but the system display an error message (Fld selectn for mvmt type 601 / acct L534200770 differs for Cost center (010) ) even if the accouting is not relevant in my scenario
Can you suggest me how the system has to be setup in order to cover my requirements?
Thanks in advance,
Alessandro

Hi,
Please clarrify which material type you are using in this scenario? I suggest you to use material type UNBW (no value updation will be there) and create a material master. Use special stock indicator K. Proceed with 601K to do GI. Hope it works. Thanking you.

How to amend a do an post a goods issue by using BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM

Dear All,
As advised in this forum ,I want to used BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC to amend my DO and post a goods issue. However, I keep getting error message "error in document 80000970 item 000010 (quantity consistency check)"
code:
DATA:
W_HEADER_DATA LIKE BAPIOBDLVHDRCON,
W_HEADER_CONTROL LIKE BAPIOBDLVHDRCTRLCON,
DELIVERY_NUM LIKE BAPIOBDLVHDRCON-DELIV_NUMB,
W_ITEM_DATA LIKE BAPIOBDLVITEMCON,
I_ITEM_DATA LIKE BAPIOBDLVITEMCON OCCURS 0,
I_RETURN LIKE BAPIRET2 OCCURS 0.
DATA :
W_RETURN LIKE BAPIRET2,
L_RETURN LIKE SY-SUBRC.
PERFORM OUTBOUND_DELIVERY
CHANGING
    L_RETURN.
FORM OUTBOUND_DELIVERY
CHANGING
        L_OUT_RETURN   LIKE SY-SUBRC.
DATA:
V_LOGSTR(128)    TYPE C.                       "LOG ÄÚÈÝ
DELIVERY_NUM = '80000970'.    "DO NUMBER
"HEAD DATA PART
W_HEADER_DATA-DELIV_NUMB = '80000970'.
W_HEADER_DATA-GROSS_WT = 240.
W_HEADER_DATA-NET_WEIGHT = 240 .
W_HEADER_DATA-UNIT_OF_WT = 'G'.
"HEAD DATA CONTROL PART
W_HEADER_CONTROL-DELIV_NUMB = '80000970'.
W_HEADER_CONTROL-GROSS_WT_FLG = 'X'.
W_HEADER_CONTROL-NET_WT_FLG = 'X'.
W_HEADER_CONTROL-VOLUME_FLG = 'X'.
W_HEADER_CONTROL-POST_GI_FLG = 'X'.
"ITEM DATA PART
CLEAR W_ITEM_DATA.
W_ITEM_DATA-DELIV_NUMB = '80000970'.
W_ITEM_DATA-DELIV_ITEM = '000010'.
W_ITEM_DATA-MATERIAL = '0015223'.
W_ITEM_DATA-BATCH = '20040202'.
W_ITEM_DATA-DLV_QTY = 1.
W_ITEM_DATA-SALES_UNIT = 'CAR'.
APPEND W_ITEM_DATA TO I_ITEM_DATA.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC'
EXPORTING
    HEADER_DATA                = W_HEADER_DATA
    HEADER_CONTROL             = W_HEADER_CONTROL
    DELIVERY                   = DELIVERY_NUM
TABLES
HEADER_DEADLINES           =
    ITEM_DATA                  = I_ITEM_DATA
    RETURN                     = I_RETURN
LOOP AT I_RETURN INTO W_RETURN.
    IF W_RETURN-TYPE = 'E'.
      L_OUT_RETURN = 4.
      MESSAGE   ID     W_RETURN-ID
                TYPE   W_RETURN-TYPE
                NUMBER W_RETURN-NUMBER
                WITH   W_RETURN-MESSAGE_V1
                       W_RETURN-MESSAGE_V2
                       W_RETURN-MESSAGE_V3
                       W_RETURN-MESSAGE_V4
                INTO   V_LOGSTR.
      WRITE :/ V_LOGSTR.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
ENDFORM.
Does anybody have a hint to the cause of the error message?
There's no problem to do a goods issue manually in VL02n for the delivery.
Best Regards,
ERIC XU

Hi Lin,
   he has changed the commit value to 'X' in DEBUG mode.
If you just want to test it in se37, you have to keep a break point in the WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE_2 fm, and give the value of COMMIT = 'X' in debugging.
If you want to do the same in a program, you have to cal the fm: bapi_transaction_commit after the call to the BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC bapi.
Regards,
ravi

Posting multiple goods issues against the same delivery

Hello gurus,
We are a fashion apparel company using ECC 6.0 and would like to know if it is possible to post mutliple goods issues against the same delivery?
I will explain the business requirement.
- We create a stock transport order to deliver 400 units of merchandise to on or our retail stores (STO is created and processed to a delivery).
- This information is passed down to our warehouse management system (which is not SAP)
- Our warehouse management system has the ability to split a delivery into multiple shipment when needed. For example, our warehouse may only be able to complete 250 units for our morning shipment and will therefore pick, pack and post this. This will feed back into SAP and process a 641 movement so that the units now show as "in transit". This is needed so that our stores can process the ASN and move the units into their inventory when they receive the merchandise later that day.
- During the afternoon, our warehouse will process the remaining 150 units and will ship this to our store later in the evening or next day.
Currently, we are not able to process another goods issue against a delivery as we close out the delivery during the first goods issue. We would prefer not to have to generate a new delivery for our DC and let them continue to process against the same delivery, but we are unsure how to configure this.
Any help or guideance would be extremely appreciated
Thanks in advance

Hi RJ,
First of all sorry to write such a lengthy reply,In one line if i want to summerize then it is not possible with standard SAP however we can achieve this by writing some piece of code in both the system
AS - IS
               Business process
          From business process point of view you are right that once the pick & pack is in process it is not advisable to create a new delivery document for balance quantity and share the same with WMS as then they have to create a new document in WMS and start picking based on that rather then the old delivery document number. if i am in your position then i can give a thought like this
e.g.
Delivery                                                  - 100 Unit
Shipment confirmation from WMS            -   60 Unit
Change in delievry quanity / Pick qty        -   60 Unit
Invoice from SAP                                    -   60 Unit
Second confirmation from WMS                          -   40 Unit
Change in the existing delivery quantity                -   Now here we have two option either
1) Change the delivery quantity / Pick qty to (60+40) =100 or
2) Remove the 60 and update 40 as delivery and pick quantity
Pros & Cons
if you will select option 1 then furhter invoice will happen for 100 unit which is incorrect as physically you are shipping only 40 unit
if you are selecting option 2 then the document flow is incorrect as you don't have history(in SAP) for the 60 unit which was shipped earlier
Solution ::
so in my opinion the best option is to create a seperate delivery document (store the old delviery number in one of the field of the new delivery and pass the same to custom segment of the IDoc) transmit the IDoc to WMS write the validation logic in WMS
Find the record with old deliver number in the WMS system, check the status whether it is active or inactive
if it is acitive Validate the Material + qty with the WMS record(Material + balance quantity) if both are same then pass the new deliery number to custom field of the WMS table
At the time of confirming back to the SAP, Write a piece of code in SAP that if the incoming idoc custom field(new delivery number) field is populated then ignore the orignal document number and post the document using the new delivery document number
Hope this help

Goods Issue with reference to Material document

Hello,
I would like to create Goods Issue with reference to material document (Transfer Posting document) , but the following message appears :
"Selected material document does not correspond with action to be executed".
Is it possible to create Goods Issue with reference to Transfer Posting (mov.type 311 - from stor.loc. to stor.loc.) ?
Thanks

Thanks,
probably I'll have to find another way to solve this business requirement of copying the transfer document data in GI.
We have an auto created transfer postings via interface from another system and the main idea was to use already entered fields in transfer posting document such as material , quantity , text , goods recepient , etc. and not to enter them twice when GI should be created. In our case (it's a case for certain materials) it's always 1:1 relationship, so the idea was to facilitate the job of creating the GI, because GI should contain the same data as in transfer posting document.

Goods Issue with Purchase Account Management

Hi,
in one of our foreign subsidiaries we have to run the MM-Purchase Account Management. These subsidiaries will be delivered by Cross-Company Replenishment deliveries with intercompany-invoicing. Every Goods receipt for such an replenishment delivery will be posted in the receiving subsidiary, besides the normal bookings on the u2018Goods/Invoice Received clearing accountu2019 and u2018Stock accountsu2019, on additional purchasing accounts. Now itu2019s possible that the goods have to be returned to the delivering plant due to any problems. To send back the goods we use again a SD-delivery (triggered also by an MM-IC-Purchase order) and with this SD-delivery we want also to post the goods issue in the subsidiary. But as the goods receipt has been posted on these special additional purchasing accounts, the goods issue has also to be posted on these special additional purchasing accounts (The target is to correct these purchasing accounts to the ammount of the returned goods). But it seems that this is not possible because of the MM-Account determination which doesnu2019t allow to post on these special purchasing accounts with an SD-transaction. Iu2019m no MM-expert but is there any possibility to post on this purchase accounts also when posting a goods issue in SD? If not in standard, are there any User-Exits in the account determination?
Regards
Stephan
Edited by: Stephan Nadler on Aug 12, 2008 1:20 PM

Hello Dinesh,
Batch valuation is similar to split valuation. Here is the link on how batch valuation works.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/25/283db54f7811d18a150000e816ae6e/content.htm
Please check in sandbox environment before using.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

BAPI to post a Goods issue with relation to Sales Order?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for