Base value vs current insurable value

Dear Forum,
1 May I know what is the difference between base value and current insurable value? I read the help but still not clear.
2 The insurance premium is based on base value or current insurable value?
Thanks
Rgds

hi
please check this out.
Re: insurance base value and curr ins value
regards
eashwar

Similar Messages

In correct Excise Base Value in Import PO

Dear Experts ,
I have an query on the Excise Base value in Import PO .
The problem is I have made a Import Po , paid the customs duty through MIRO & now when I am doing J1IEX_C wrt to commercial invoice , its showing the Excise base value which is less then the value it should be , the tax amt like Excise BED, AED, Se cess & E cess is getting calculated correctly.
Can somebody tell me where the problem is.
Regards,
DGN 21
Edited by: dgn21 on Dec 3, 2010 6:24 AM

>
dgn21 wrote:
> Dear Jeyakanthan,
>
> As explained earlier after paying to the customs through MIRO, I am doing J1IEX_C, in this transaction, the excise duty is being calculated correctly but the Assessable shown is incorrect.
> I have following condition in schema:
> Gross Price (A):
> Insurance %(B)
> Basic Landing Charges (C):
> Assessable value: (A)(B)(C)
> Basic customs Duty (D)
> CVD (E)
> Ecess on CVD (F):
> S E Cess on CVD (G):
> And then other conditions
>
> Presently the system is calculating the Assessable value as (A) + (D) {i.e. Gross price +Basic Customs duty}, but it should be (A) + (B) +(C).
> Kindly tell me where I need to do the changes so I can get the correct Assessable value as desired.
>
>
> Thanks in advance
Check import pricing procedure calculations in M/08 ?

Base value in migo

Dear all,
I'm creatng a import po
Gross Price-1,314,117.00
IMP INSURANCE IN VAL-1,280.00
Landed Price-13,153.97
IN Basic customs-66,427.55
IN CVD-223,196.57
Ecess on In CVD-6,695.90
Customs ECess on TD-8,889.61
IN additional duty-65,350.43
Neg.Landed Price-13,153.97
but my querry is that what value should come at the time of MIGO 3rd header excise item column
base value amount- how much amount .pls explain in detail points should be rewarded.
amin

Hi Bharat,
Thank you very much for your quick response.
It is not intra company STO. This is normal procurement from the outside vendor.
Can you explain me why it is coming Zero
Hope it is clear for you
If you have any query, please do not hesitate to ask me
Thanks in advance
KK

Excise base Value

Hi all,
Currently system calculating "Base Value" of Excise Invoice based on exchange rate maintained in OB08 in case of Import PO. Our requirement is "Base Value" should be calculated on the basis of exchange rate in PO.
Thanks in advanc

Hi ,
If I change the base value of excise in MIGO(according to PO,where exchange rate is fixed) then excise BED ,AED and ECS will changed which we do not want to change.
please see base line package J83 procurement of imported materials page 15 under excise item tab ,base value is taken default by system (where ?)
kunwar

Asset Base Value = 26 "Rem. book value w/o revaluation"

Hello Experts
i have got a requirement from my client. He don't want to have the depreciation on " revaluation amount" for certain asset /s
The current configuration settings are as follows:
(a) Activated new depreciation "EA-FIN" is actived through T.Code SFW5
(b) Depreciation is being used based on "useful life"
(c) New Deprecaition key is configured as "ZREV" with a period control (T.Code AFAMP) of (01/01/11/01). here, i have kept blank against "Revalution" and Multi level key as " Z01"
(d) The Mutl-Level configuration through T.Code - AFAMS -> the Base value is chosen from drop down as "26 - Rem. book value w/o revaluation"
(e) new depreciation key is maintained in asset master data
However, i am getting the value of depreciation is being calculated on revaluation amount.
Kindly help me, is there any additional configuration is required to done?
Regads
Anil Kumar

Hi,
please see the explanation part of note 1475896 (not the coding corrections).
regards Bernhard

Freight & Misc amount add to the excise base value.

Hi all,
I am facing problem in pricing that when i add the some value in purchase order as freight & Insurance then it will add to my Excise base value.
How can i resolve this so that freight value not included in excise base value (Net value for excise )
Regards,
Dinesh

>
Dinesh Singhal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am facing problem in pricing that when i add the some value in purchase order as freight & Insurance then it will add to my Excise base value.
>
> How can i resolve this so that freight value not included in excise base value (Net value for excise )
>
> Regards,
> Dinesh
You have to look up in CALCULATION SCHEMA, besides EXCISE BASE VALUE in FROM TO field what numbers are mentioned there, suppose freight and insurance is step 1, and besides excise from to field it is mentioned 1 to 3, you need to take step 1 out of there so in this case EXCISE BASE VALUE FROM TO field should read 2 and 3, this way freight and insurance will be excluded from calculation.
All the calculation is calculated from FROM TO field of the sub total, or net total, if you dont want certain condition to be added to the total, just remove its step from the FROM TO field.

Condition Base Value Routine

Hello all,
I am currently facing an issue where we have created a Custom Condition Base value routine for a Tax Condition type.
In our scenario, we have Sales Tax condition type ZZTX which has the following parameters:
Cond. class       D Taxes
Calculat.type     A Percentage
Cond.category D Tax
Rounding rule       Commercial
Also since its a tax condition type, it is set to D - cannot be modified manually.
Also in the pricing procedure, the condition type is pointing row 301 to pickup the condition value basis. This is for the normal scenarios. However when a particular condition is satisfied (which is coded in routine 902 for ZZTX) the code in 902 is supposed to change the condition base value for ZZTX.
800     0     ZZTX     Tax for Sales     301                       10          902     MWS
This functionality is not working at this point. When I debug, I can see the code appending the calculated value to the condition base value for ZZTX.
However on the screen, I still see the condition base value being picked up from row 301.
I need some input from you guys so as to find it the condition type zztx should have some parameters set to allow the change or is there a problem in the 902 routine ?
Kindly advise
Thanks
Vin

Hi Vin,
Please check with your ABAP expert if he has done below to fetch calculated value to hold it correctly,
   l_val_190    TYPE kwert,   l_val_210    TYPE kbetr,
I guess it is to do with Data type only in your 902 routine
Hope this will solve your probelm,
Regards,
Siva

Scale base value in rebate processing for CM /DM must not be updated

I created a rebate condition type with calculation type A (percentage) and scale basis C (qty). The billing types for credit and debet memo are set relevant for rebate (TVFK-BORVF). The value of a credit / debet memo is added to the condition base value in the rebate agreement and the quantity to the scale base value (standard). For us it is not an option to create credit and debet memos without quantity. What I need is that the value is added to the condition base value but the quantity is not added to the scale base value. How can I achiev this?
Example
standard order   Qty 1100, value 11.000
CM                      Qty 200, value 500
Rebate agreement with scale
0 to 1000    4%
from 1000 5%
The final settlement must calculate 5% over 10.500. Currently it calculating 4% over 10.500.
Thanks in advance

hi,
check out the following link:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/de/5e74c39d3211d596fc0000e835339d/frameset.htm
Regards,
siddharth.

Base Value 03 = Replacement Value

Hi,
I would like to know what does this base value 03 = Replacement Value. We always use 01 & 24 for Acquisition & Net Book value respectively. This can be found in the Multilevel method. Appreciate your answers.
rgds,
jay

Hi Jay,
The current valuation of an asset, which is different from the acquisition and production costs.
The replacement value of an asset can result, for example, from the following influences:
- Price changes because of inflation
- Price changes because of technical advancement
Regards Bernhard

Scale base value total $ based on confirmed quantities

Hi,
I have a requirement from my user and i think of a solution but wondering if there is a more standard SAP solution without programming a formula. Here is the case :
We want to give special discounts on non current material. Material that are from last season and that we want to sell all the remaining items.
So when the total $ of the line will exceed for example 100 000 $ then, the customer will have a 20 % discount but of course we want to consider only confirmed quantities as it is sold-out items. If for example, we have 100 items remaining, we don't want the customer to order 500 items in order to reach the 100 000 $ as for sure, we will never ship the 400 remaining items as we will never have more available items.
So i'm proposing the create a new discount condition type for which we will use value scale (B as a scale basis). But the scale base value should be total net price for confirmed quantites only. The solution i can do is program a scale base value formula that will multiply the confirmed quantity by the net price to obtain the total net price for confirmed quantities for the line. And also, i will have to take care of currency calculation if the document currency is not the same as the condition record currency.
Is there another way to do it more standard SAP ?
And also if i want to use group condition in order to calculate the total net price on multiple items eligible for the discount ? Will it work ? will it sum all the total net price for confirmed quantities ? (scale base value).
Thanks.
Myriam
Edited by: Myriam Catrycke on Aug 7, 2008 3:29 PM

Hi,
We don't want to pay retroactively but at the order time. Our customers order on line and we want them to see immediately the discount they will have.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Myriam

Unplanned depriciation reducing the base value.

Dear Experts,
We have a asset on which we have posted a Unplanned depriciation, which has in turn reduced the Depriciation base value for future depriciation caluculation. Where as we want to depriciate the asset at APC value not at the Reduced base value (which is APC - Uplanned depriciation). Please suggest the possilbe solutin for this. Apart from this I have searched forum and learned that Unplanned depriciation can not be reversed. Please suggest any possilbe workaround through which we can reverse the uplanned depriciation.
Regards
JK

HI
1. When did you post this unplanned depreciation?? In the past yr or this year??
If you posted it in the past years, then it is bound to impact in the current year... if you wanna avoid that, then Asset write up is the correct suggestion as given above
I think the Std Tr Type in ABZU would suffice.. No need to create a new tr type
2. If you posted the unplanned dep this year - Then you can control it in AFAMP as to when it should impact.. The Period controls have a new column for Unplanned dep, provided you have activated the new dep engine in EhP4
br, Ajay M

In import process,how excise base value is calculated in MIGO

Hi expert's,
In import process,how excise base value is calculated in MIGO,with what referance values get add to base value.
waiting for your valuable response,
Regards
V.raj

hi,
we Tried with your following reply ! but still not finding exact value in base value .
(MATERIAL PRICE* QTY IN MIGO * EXCHANGE RATE)
thanks & regards
V.Raj

How to display Base values (AFS Grid) in the Report

Hi Friends,
We ar using AFS, in that we have Grid value like 0003A34
(8 chars: first 4 chars colour (0003), A represents Cup, 34 represents size of the Material), in that we can able to store the Base values like for International or US,
and for size 34 equivalent to 70 like wise.
In our reports we are using ALV grids, and showing the existing grid value like 0003A34, but we need to show Base value list like INTL or US etc, based on the region / area, the report should show the equivalent grid value like 0003A70 etc.
Please help me how to do this.
Thanks
Shankar

Dear Shankar;
I think you will be able to achieve what you try to do using grid conversion in AFS. Base Grid values can be converted to other values based on the customer, vendor or material depending on your requirement. This need to be configured in IMG and then the ID must be assigned in the Vendor or the Material Master as per the requirement.
This is somewhat complex config. Please contact me if you need any more clarifications ([email protected])
Azwath Mohammad
http://www.sapafs.net

CIN: Alteration of base value for CST in TAXINN

Hi,
In our business process there is a requirement that CST should not be calculated only on Basic Price + Excise Duties (BEDEcessSEcess) rather base value for CST should be Basic Price + Excise Duties (BEDEcessSEcess) + 2 Additional Surcharges as mentioned below:
Basic Price     100.00
BED (10%)     10.00
Ecess (2%)     0.20
SEcess (1%) 0.10
Additional Surcharge1     4.00
Additional Surcharge2     6.00
Base for CST 120.30 (100100.20.14+6)
CST (2%)     2.41 (2% of 120.30)
Total Value     122.71
The tax procedure being used is TAXINN
Is there any standard routine or subtotal available so that by using this in PO Calculation Schema and TAXINN the base value of CST can be modified as desired?
Please provide some useful ideas.
Thanks in advance
Edited by: Sapdear on Aug 29, 2011 8:22 AM

Hi,
The additional surcharges are condition types in the calculation schema of PO whereas CST is being calculated in Tax Procedure TAXINN so how "From" and "To" functionality can work. The surcharges are getting calculated in PO Pricing and CST in tax procedure TAXINN (both at different places)
We want to use a tax code (BED10%Ecess2%SEcess1%+CST2%) to calculate Excise Duties and CST by additional surcharges taking into account.
Can any one provide some idea to resolve this issue?
Thanks in advance

Excise base value is not changing in MIGO excise tab for Import PO scenari

Dear Gururs,
We are using MIGO to capture & Post Excise Invoice for our Import PO (PO type ZIMP). the problem is, when we change the qty in MIGO Qty tab, corresponding base value is not getting update in Excise tab. we are not creating the planned cost mIRO directly we do the GRN.
Please suggest a solution.
Thanks
Shital

Hello Shital ,
You are using the India Scenario right?
The issue can be because you have not assigned a zero tax code to the line item. For India please make the tax code field in PO as mandatory so that the user does not save the PO without atleast a zero tax code.
Maintain the tax code & proceed. You will see the tab in MIGO.
Regards
Plauto

Base value vs current insurable value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for