Batch is being Generate two Record for Same Vendor in Payable

Gusy, (Oracle Payable)
We have entered six validate invoice with same site,vendor,Payment mod and currency as well but when we see batch in payment window ,it is being show two record insted of one transaction ,howerver system should show one record.
Please help me to rectify this problem or any solution.
Thanks in advance.

Please confirm if you are on version 12.0.4 and the vendor is an employee type supplier. We had faced similar issue in the provided condition.
Vinit

Similar Messages

Subcontracting Info record for Same Vendor which is used in Purchasing vendor

Hi Gurus,
When we want to create info record for both standard and sub contract with one single vendor., system is not creating a separate info record.
It is considering the same Info record for all the options. This triggers error - Info record price does not match.
Reg,
Suresh

Yes.. That's correct. System will just update the same info record number.. But you should not face any problem for price fetching...
System will work properly for standard PO and subcontracting PO..
System will compare the item category of info record and PO line item, as per this comparison, system will pick the price from info record..
You can see in the above screen shot the value 3 indicates that it is for subcontracting PO.
Standard PO :
I am just changing the item category from blank to L.
Subcontracting PO:
**Edited by: Dëv Päträ

Can we generate two invoice for same product in two different currency

dear all gurus,
actually we are in export sales
so we are generating export invoice.
my client is asking for another invoice in INR too this is called comercila invoice
with this i ve to generate the ARE form
so how to do this three things
1.export invoice in foreign currency
2.commercial invoice in INR
3.ARE form with referance to this export sales
with regards
subrat

Hi Subrat,
I really dont know how this scenario can be handled.
2invoices for the same order is not allowed legally also. So if the user is asking for it, may be first they need to discuss this with their legal department.
If they say ok, then you may think of only an output, where you can change the values with a standard exchange etc. But having 2invoices in the system of different currencies for a single sales order will lead to lot of problems in reporting.
Can somebody throw some light on this, on how to enable this without any problems.

Can i give multiple versions in purchase inforecord for same vendor and mat

can i give multiple versions in purchase info record for same vendor and mat code..is is possible??? plz help me
thanks and regards
Ramesh Reddy(VALLUR)

HI,
No .where you are getting version in purchasing info record ? why you want version ? suppose we put version then where you used that version ?
to get clear picture regarding purchasing info record
check following link
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/75/ee102f55c811d189900000e8322d00/content.htm]
Regards
Kailas Ugale

PT_QTA00 is generating repetative records for the same quota type

PT_QTA00 is generating repetative records for the same quota type and one more thing i have already maintained 10 days of quota in 2006 and when i run for the same employee its creating one more record with 10 days again how can we restrict it in configuration

As said earlier, you want to setup Time Constraints for It2006 which is in table: V_T582A
You should set the Time Constraint to 2.
HR master data uses the following three time constraints:
Time Constraint 1
For the entire time that the employee works at the enterprise, exactly one valid infotype record must exist. The validity periods of the individual records must not overlap. If a new record is created, the system automatically uses the start date of the new record as the delimitation date of the old record. Gaps are only allowed between the employeeu2019s entry date and the start date of the first record.
Time constraint 1 must be used for all of the infotypes containing information that must be available at all times. This is particularly true of personal and organizational assignment data.
If a record is delimited because of time constraint 1, the system displays an appropriate message.
Time Constraint 2
No more than one valid record can exist at any one time. Records with constraint 2 must not overlap. Their existence is not obligatory. If a new record is created, the system automatically delimits the previous record, if one exists.
If a record is delimited because of time constraint 2, the system displays an appropriate message.
Time Constraint 3
Any number of valid records can exist at any one time. The individual records do not conflict with each other.

Two Purchase Info Records for Same Material & Plant Combination

Hi,
2 Purchase Info Records are there for Same Material & Plant for 2 Different Vendors & Net Price is maintained in both Info Records
1. Material M1 - Plant 1000 - Vendor A - Net Price Rs.4
2. Material M1 - Plant 2000 - Vendor B - Net Price Rs.3
Vendor A is Regular Vendor
(Tick as Regular Vendor is his Purchase Info Record)
It is observed that Rs.3 is picked up for Costing Purposes
Requirement is that - Net Price within Pur. Info Record of Regular Vendor i.e Rs. 4 must be picked up always for Costing Puposes.
Is this possible???
What Logic system uses while picking up the Price in case where there are 2 Pur. Info Records for same Material & Plant???
Thanks & Regards...
Ameya...

Hi,
1. Material M1 - Plant 1000 - Vendor A - Net Price Rs.4
(Validity - 28.04.2008 To 31.12.2008)
2. Material M1 - Plant 1000 - Vendor B - Net Price Rs.3
(Validity - 01.01.08 To 31.12.2008)
Thanks & Regards...
Ameya...

Two URLs for same WS

Hi everyone! I've created a function and I've published it like web service... Now, i see the WS in SE80 (Service Definition --> WSDL tab) and i get URL and WSDL (by example: http://hostname:8000/sap/bc/srt/wsdl/sdef_ZFUNCTIO_001/wsdl11/ws_policy/document?sap-client=100 ).
Then, i go to SOAMANAGER, and i get another URL (with a little distinct WSDL: http://hostname:8000/sap/bc/srt/wsdl/bndg_E0DE487057B0E7F1A58C005056900046/wsdl11/allinone/ws_policy/document?sap-client=100 ). If i put these in Explorer, both open correctly...
Why there're two URLs for same WS? Wich is correct?
Thanks!!

Hi,
say for example
your one URL is
x.hostname:portno/irj/1stURL
and the second URL is
x.hostname:portno/irj/2ndURL
and maintain two umLogonPagedefault.jsp with names,
umLogonPage1stURL.jsp and umLogonPage2ndURL.jsp and do the necessary coding you want inside the JSPs.
Now, umLogonPage.JSP is the JSP file responsible for determinig your portal URL to open when user wants to enter into portal. So Open that JSP(umLogonPage.JSP) and do like this:::
<%
String strReqURL = request.getRequestURL().toString()==null?"" : request.getRequestURL().toString() ;
%>
<%
if ( strReqURL != null && strReqURL.endsWith("/1stURL"))
%>
<%@ include file="umLogonPage1stURL.jsp"%>
<%
else if ( strReqURL != null && strReqURL.endsWith("/2nuURL"))
%>
<%@ include file="umLogonPage2ndURL.jsp"%>
<%
%>
Regards,
Srinivas.

F110 Payment Proposal multiple payment lines for same vendor

Hello,
Question for the FI community regarding single payments for multiple invoices for the same vendor. Is there any other place that would dictate the grouping (or non grouping) of multiple payment proposal lines for same vendor payment?
I understand that there are two places:
FBZP - Change view 'Maintenance of Company Code Data for a Payment Method", the flag for 'Single payment for marked item'
Vendor Master - Automatic payment transactions, flag for 'Individual pmnt'
Is there anywhere else where this may be dictated? At my location, we have two company codes that make ACH payments, settings for FBZP (Single payment for marked item flag) and selected vendor for payment in the vendor master is identical. I get different results when viewing the payment proposal for each company code. Company Code A parses out individual line items for payment in the proposal, and Company Code B does not. When I change the flag via FBZP for Company Code A, this resolves the issue. When I make the same change for Company Code B, there is no change.
In all of my testing, I have left the 'Individual pmnt' flag for both vendor masters unchecked.
I'm hoping that somebody in the community here would be able to point me in the right direction to understand why I am getting differences. Is there somewhere else that I can check?
Thanks everyone.

Ravi,
Thanks for your reply, however in my post I already mentioned I have tested out both options via FBZP as well as the vendor master. You are correct, in only one case regarding my situation.
In my example for Company Code B, I have the following scenarios:
1. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
2. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is multiple payment items for each invoice
3. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
4. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is a multiple payment items for each invoice
Are you saying that the option in FBZP simply enables the grouping/non grouping based on what the vendor master record payment option is? Typically, that option for vendors is not checked in either of our company codes, therefore if the only difference is the setting in FBZP, then why would I be getting only a single payment for multiple invoices in the case of scenario 1 listed above?
That's why I am wondering if perhaps there is something elsewhere than FBZP and vendor master settings that could be affecting this.
Comments please?

1099 payments are not combined for same vendor payments

Hi All
I have a question on 1099 reporting.
My issue is that we are running the report in transaction code s_p00_07000134 separately by company code because all these company codes have separate tax ids except few of them which have same tax ids. My client wants to run them (ccodes with same tax ids) together and if there is a same vendor on these company codes . They are being shown on the report separately and the 1099 forms are printing separately.
Cant the system combine the payments for same vendors under different company codes with same tax ids run together/
Please help me..

Hello,
Did you get the answer for this problem? Could you please explain how did you resolve it?
Thanks

Different Pricing Schema in PO and PIR for same vendor and material

Dear Experts,
I am facing an issue related to MM.
I have a vendor and a material under a plant, purchase Org, purchase group.
When we are creating a Purchase Info Record (PIR), it is picking one pricing schema, while when creating PO for same vendor and material, it is picking another different pricing schema.
As per my knowledge, pricing schema in PO is picked as per pricing schema group of Vendor and I believe same applies for PIR as well. I have only one vendor pricing schema group.
Because of this issue, I have to manually key-in condition values in PO for all condition types even though I have maintained a purchase info record.
Please suggest, what can be reason.
Regards,
Praveen

Hi,
Thanks for clearing my doubts.
However, I stuck-up in another issue.
Problem is that condition type- PB00 is linked with almost all pricing schemas.
Hence, I can't change pricing procedure in condition type- PB00.
Also, I can't include all J* related condition types in RM0002 as well.
Hence, if PB00 remains as RM0002 and I maintain my pricing procedure- ZJIMPO to all J* condition types, still I am not able to create PIR for all J* conditions. Error "Condition type J1CV is not in procedure A M RM0002".
How to handle this issue? Please suggest.
Thanks
Praveen

Configuration for consolidated check for same vendor from different company

Hi All,
My company is trying to print a single check for same vendor with same vendor number in multiple company code.
The Automatic payment parameters has all company codes where the vendor is having open items.
But when payment run is carried out and the check is printed, there are more than 1 check printed for the same vendor corresponding to the cleared invoices.
One company is paying for all other companies and still multiple checks are printed.
Can someone help with some lead to resolve this issue.
Points will be assigned for helpful tips and answers.
Thanks alot in advance

Hi,
i understood ur problem so dont worry.... solution is there in sap
while confiqure automatic payment program in FBZP give paying company code payment transaction give company code what check through you want to pay that ....ofter that payment will go through this company code check only
may be this information is useful to you

Amount splitting for same vendor recon account in MIRO

Hi Gurus.........
I am very new into SAP MM.
I am facing a problem in MIRO. while simulating I am getting 2 line items for same vendor account splitting the total amount to be credited against the vendor.
the miro-simulation is just like following....
A     G/L     Act/Mat/Ast/Vndr                               Procurement Doc     Amount     Cur
S     200010     GR/IR Clearing A/C                                                    1,000,000.00     INR
S     100007     input VAT credit-Non-capital goods                               40,000.00     INR
K     200001     WIN TECHNOLOGIES / 741235 KALYANI          520,000.0-     INR
K     200001     WIN TECHNOLOGIES / 741235 KALYANI          520,000.0-     INR
Please tell me where did I make mistakes.........how can I rectify it..
Thanks in advance...

Hi
This can also be because of document splitting. Can you check whether document splitting is active in your system ?
If yes, these are some examples based on which document splitting can happen
Examples of document splitting characteristics:
·       Profit center
·       Segment
·       Business area
·       Customer field
Thanks !
E.Avudaiappan

Multiple reconcillation accounts for same vendor

All SAP Gurus,
Is it possible to have Multiple reconcillation accounts for same vendor code (where purchasing org and company code is same)?
Regards,

hi,
You can't have more than one because the reconcilation account...Because this is the soul account by which you pay to vendor and send the details to further process to FI dept...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Vendor Hierarchy - Creating Master Record for a Vendor Hierarchy node

Hi gurus,
I have configured the Vendor hierarchy as per procedure.
What is the T code/path to create the master record for a vendor hierarchy node? Also please let me know the procedure to map the existing vendors to the hierarchy.
Thanks and regards
Durai

Hi Gurus,
Your help would be greatly appreciated. Please throw your inputs.
Thanks and regards
Durai

Report generating two rows for the very first record

Hi ,
I have designed a simple RTF template using Table Wizard in MS Words.When I am trying to view the report in excel , the report shows two entries for first record.The problem is with first record only and other entries displyed are fine.When I tried deleting the first record , the next record is showing two rows.
Am I missing something here ?
Please advice.
Thanks!!

Hi ,
I got this sorted out.The pbm was with my XML as My Rowset and Row had the same name.I changeed the rowset name and it worksfine now.
Thanks Vetsrini!!

Batch is being Generate two Record for Same Vendor in Payable

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for