Benefits of F110

Dear All,
Can anybody list out the benefits of F110 over the manual payment (F-53 & F-58) process.
do elaborate.
Regards

Some of the advantages of automatic payment run are:
1) vendors which have open line items and only those which are due for a given date are automatically picked up and made available for payment while in manual payments the vendor to whom the payment is made needs to be selected. Even a vendor without any due item may be paid in manual payment process.
2) clearing of paid items from vendor due is automatically performed by the system, in manual payment process, this would have be done manually.
3) More than one vendor, company code,  can be paid with automatic payment program, while in manual payment only one vendor can be paid.
4) Bank Selection is automatic based on payment method and bank ranking order. This has to be manually done in manual payment process.
5) items blocked for payment cannot be paid unless the proposal is edited, but in manual payment process, payment block may be circumvented.

Similar Messages

  • Vendor's same open item selected for payment twice through APP run F110

    Hi,
    In F110 run, specified vendor  number and payment method(Bank Transfer), executed payment run.
    After, say 5 minutes interval again executed F110 for all vendors and except for the above mentioned payment method.
    In the first case, payment document generated, posted and cleared the Vendor open items. Here, the Payment method is B.
    In the second time also, the same open items are selected in the payment run and the payment method D(Cheque payment).
    Payment document generated and is not posted but cheque is generated for the same amount.
    How could it happened?

    Hi,
    In F110 run, specified vendor  number and payment method(Bank Transfer), executed payment run.
    After, say 5 minutes interval again executed F110 for all vendors and except for the above mentioned payment method.
    In the first case, payment document generated, posted and cleared the Vendor open items. Here, the Payment method is B.
    In the second time also, the same open items are selected in the payment run and the payment method D(Cheque payment).
    Payment document generated and is not posted but cheque is generated for the same amount.
    How could it happened?

  • F110 Automatic payment cancel

    Hi All,
    User created vendor payments in F110, but not created the proposal and also payments went wrong and there all vendor open items cleared.
    Actually as per the monthly schedule only selected items he need to clear.
    So How to cancel the F110 payment and again how to do the same date (i.e. on 28.02.2014) payment?
    Regards,
    Raghu

    Hi Raghu,
    As Ajay mentioned, you Need to reset and reverse the Documents.
    You can use F.80 for mass reversal of documents. However, for resetting, FBRA is the only Transaction.
    BR
    Amitash

  • F110 - Issue with creation of wire file

    Hi Sap gurus,
    May be someone could guide me through this issue.  Iam using the payment program (F110) to pay the vendors. I have Bank 1  and Bank 2 which are used  for wire Payments. The ranking order is 1  for Bank 1 and Bank 2 has ranking order 2.  Business wants to use Bank 2 to pay for International vemdors.The variant in the RFFOM100 uses the house Bank of Bank 2 and its Account ID. When i run the payment program it pays the vendor from Bank 1 and also does not create the wire file as it should. How ever when i chnage the ranking of this Bank 2 to a 1 , it creates the right posting to right account and creates the wire file. What should I do if i had to pay with Bank2 and have the wire file generated? Do I have chnage the rankings all the time, or  is it something iam missing.
    Thanks
    sapsri

    Hi,
    Ranking order is created for the combination of payment method and house bank.
    In your case, create 2 payment methods for wire transfer and assing the different  payment methods to the banks, with ranking order 1 for both.
    Example: PAyment method "W" Ranking order "1" house bank 1000
                   Payment method "T"  Ranking order "1" house bank 1100
    This should resolve your issue

  • Transação F110

    Boa tarde.
    Estamos com o seguinte problema. Na elaboração de uma proposta na F110 de 5 documentos de uma mesmo fornecedor todos com somente 1 parcela, apresentou o seguinte erro :
    LOG DE EXECUÇÃO
    Erro interno: saldo-doc não é zero / empresa BR11 fornec 313396 cliente
    Saldos:                 0,00  BRL   /                    0,00  BRL
    Saldos:                 0,08  EUR   /                    0,00
    Log adicional de documento contábeis----
    Moedas na 1. linha: BRL  /  BRL                 Moedas na 2. linha: EUR  /  ___
    Doc. empresa BR11 moeda BRL forma pagamento T
    Ítem   Conta                             Montante                      Imposto
    001   29 0000313396              14.350,00                     0,00
                                                      6.057,25                     0,00
    002   29 0000313396              11.800,00                     0,00
                                                      4.980,79                     0,00
    003   29 0000313396              11.800,00                     0,00
                                                      4.980,79                     0,00
    004   29 0000313396              11.800,00                     0,00
                                                      4.980,79                     0,00
    005   29 0000313396              11.800,00                     0,00
                                                      4.980,79                     0,00
    006   50 0000111301              61.550,00                     0,00
                                                    25.980,33                     0,00
    Indicação relativa ao fornec 313396  /  empresa pagadora BR11  ........
    ......por motivo do erro mencionado não é possível executar os pagamentos
    LOG DA PROPOSTA
    Log adicional de documento contábeis----
    Moedas na 1. linha: BRL  /  BRL                 Moedas na 2. linha: EUR  /  ___
    Doc. F110000001 empresa BR11 moeda BRL forma pagamento T
    Ítem   Conta                             Montante                      Imposto
    001   29 0000313396              14.350,00                     0,00
                                                      6.057,17                     0,00
    002   29 0000313396              11.800,00                     0,00
                                                      4.980,79                     0,00
    003   29 0000313396              11.800,00                     0,00
                                                      4.980,79                     0,00
    004   29 0000313396              11.800,00                     0,00
                                                      4.980,79                     0,00
    005   29 0000313396              11.800,00                     0,00
                                                      4.980,79                     0,00
    006   50 0000111301              61.550,00                     0,00
                                                    25.980,33                     0,00
    Fim do log.
    O erro mencionado pode ser visto no ítem 001 de amobs os logs onde o montante em moeda forte apresenta a diferença de R$ 0,08 ( R$ 6.057,25 contra R$ 6.057,17 ).
    As taxas de câmbio ( tabela TCURR ) foram atualizadas às 5 hrs da madrugada do dia do processamento, na tablea BKPF os valores das taxas para cada um dos dos é rigorosamente igual ao das taxas de câmbio, portanto, EUR  2.36770.
    Curioso é que os títulos cujos ítens ( 002 até 005 ) se aplicado a regra de conversão foi aplicado o valor de EUR 2.36769.
    Gostaria de saber se alguém já passou por essa situação e pode me ajudar e antecipadamente agradecer pela colaboração.
    Atenciosamente.

    Consegui a solução do problema com a aplicação na nota SAP:  1578928
    Porém para versões anteriores a 605 estas outras notas também tratam deste assunto:
    1557883
    1488637
    1433884
    1422932
    1408793
    1401523
    1401389
    1376505
    1321546
    1317395
    1304847
    1298483
    Marcelo Rodrigues.

  • Step by Step document on Guided Procedures for Benefits.......Help Needed..

    Hello Gurus,
    We are in process of implementing Benefits and for which we are using Guided Procedures, want to have understanding of the process can you please provide the step by step documentation and an example process that will be of great help.
    Appreciate your help.
    Thanks in advance for your time.
    Kind Regards,
    Pramod

    Hi Pramod,
    Please have a look at the below links. You will probably get some help.
    First of all, see the following thread, see the answer by shen peng in the end, explained CAF in very simple terms:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/thread?threadID=470956&tstart=0
    Now have a look at the following links for understanding about CAF, :
    <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4277f37b-0601-0010-0597-89e792177e2b">Creating Composite Applications with SAP CAF</a>
    <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/84df3e36-0301-0010-be9d-b99aad8c81e6">Composite Application Framework in SAP NetWeaver</a>
    <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1122">CAF training material online</a>
    <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1231">Additional CAF Training material online</a>
    See the following links for understanding CAF GP in detail:
    <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/0b1c2eda-0c01-0010-b597-b107502cdc71">CAF Guided Procedures Overview</a>
    <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/39/198141f906040de10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm">CAF Guided Procedures</a>
    <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/c7/984942da51690de10000000a155106/frameset.htm">Concepts of the Guided Procedures Framework</a>
    Lastly, see the following links for CAF GP Wiki Home Page and CAF Tutorial Center:
    <a href="https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/BPX/Guided+Procedures">CAF Guided Procedures Wiki Home Page</a>
    <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/nw-composition?rid=/webcontent/uuid/d8dbd703-0801-0010-c9bf-c04bc52f562f">Composite Application Framework Tutorial Center</a>
    You can also have a look at the following thread, you can drill down into many more links:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/thread?threadID=405517&tstart=0
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/thread?threadID=314804&tstart=50
    Bye
    Ankur

  • Benefits of SAP Business Warehouse Reporting compared with the Query-tools?

    Hello experts,
    I've been creating reports with SAP Query tools, but been faced with few problems. First of all, there are restricted possibilities in terms of joining tables, and thus I cannot include all the data required for the report.
    One solution for this would have been to create separate queries and join the data together in Excel. The problem with this is that there exists no common field that would make sense as for a selection criterion. If the selection criterion is different in different queries, there is the danger of combining false data together, which would eventually result with distorted data. 
    So I was wondering, could anyone briefly tell me if SAP Business Warehouse reporting would solve these problems? And what other benefits would it provide compared with the SAP Query? I'd urgently need to know if it would be a beneficial investment for the company, since I haven't found solutions for the problems occurred in the creation of reports.
    Thank you in advance for you help!
    Maria

    The answers are yes - and thousands of companies have gone down this route
    Puttingin BW is a strategic aim of the comapny and not to be thought about and discussed in a BI forum such as this
    The costs of implementation and hardware will no doubt make your eyes water.
    To be quite honest SAP BI is a "no brainer" as most of the new e-SOA and new R3 modules reply on BW for their reporting needs

  • Idoc not generating in F110

    Hi,
    I have a requirement to generate Idoc in F110.
    For this i created one payment method with incoming payments and payment method classification and assigned program RFFOEDI1
    I run F110 successfully but IDOC is not getting generated.
    previously we created the same payment method for country spain and now i am creating this for Italy with same program and other details. Still IDOC is not getting generated.
    Am i miss anything else FBZP configuratoin? Please let me know
    Regards,
    Sankar

    Hi,
    I clicked on create payment medium but still error is not resolved.
    Hi sunil,
    Thanks for your valuable inputs.
    As i told earlier i have house bank Bank of America(BOA) available for spain earlier with EDI partner number as 121.
    For house bank Bank of America (BOA) for italy i added the new payment method R in EDI compatiable payment methods. System automatically generated House bank BOA as a EDI partner number.
    Before payment method "R" added in EDI compatiable payment methods (in FI12 for italy house bank)for partner number 121 i have outbound parameters message type as DIRDEB and PAYEXT after i add payment method "R" for partner profile 121 outbound parameter message showing as PAYEXT and newly added inbound parameter EURTXT. For the EDI partner number BOA outbound parameters message type addes as DIRDEB and PAYEXT.
    I am in a confusion that by adding payment method "R" in FI12 EDI compatible payment method system is going to create new EDI partner number BOA but due to that the earlier partner number 121 is getting effected. Due to this reason i am not able to go ahead further.
    Regards,
    Sankar

  • Item text is not getting updated in Payment document generated through F110

    Hi all,
    After generating the payment document via Transaction Code u2013 F110, system is not updating the Text field in the payment document with the text that we have entered in the Invoice (MIRO or FI Invoice).
    While processing the document via transaction code u2013 F110, in the layout shown for the Invoices to be considered for payment (screen of u201CEdit Proposalu201D), text is not getting updated. When we pressed F1 at the Text field (Which is blank) we came to know that it is a u201CItem Textu201D with u201CTable u2013 REGUEu201D /  u201CField u2013 SGTXTu201D.
    In BSEG (SGTXT field) as well as BSIK (SGTXT field) we are getting the Invoice document with the text maintained in it via MIRO or FI invoice.
    But while processing the invoices through Tcode - F110, in the layout of Edit Proposal (Table - REGUE / Field - SGTXT) we are not getting the u201CText fieldu201D but getting the other data such as Doc. No.( Table - REGUE / Field - BELNR), Fiscal Year (Table - REGUE / Field - GJAHR) etc for processing the proposal which is getting shown in BSEG as well as BSIK.
    In case of manual payment (F-53) we can input the text manually hence that will get updated in payment document but this thing is not possible with F110.
    Can anybody guide me on getting the ItemText (Not Doc. Header text) in FI payment document after F110 execution?
    Regards,
    Shridhar

    Hi Suresh,
    Thanks for the prompt reply. We will be obliged if you guide us in that respect since F110 is a Std. SAP code.
    Have you refer OSS before arriving at the conclusion of developing ABAP program since the Item Text is a std. field of Std. Tcode - F110. Same should had been get updated while making the payment in reference to the Invoice which haves item text in it ?
    Regards
    Shridhar
    FICO

  • UK Payroll (Year End HMRC Return - Taxable Benefits)

    Hi Payroll Experts,
    Please look in to below issue any ideas and solutions plz revert back to me ASAP.
    On the employees expenses and benefits form P11D, section F, which is cars and fuel is not calculating right.  It seems to be tided up with the amount paid by employee for private use of the car.  Some the figure does not appear and others it's taking off the lump sum payments from the lease car payments, which it should not.  Lump sum payment seems to calculating right under section E.
    Ex:
    The numbers are as follows
    1111    (xxxx)    Lease deduction of £490.83 not appearing in box  (amount paid by employee for private use)
    Therefore the cash equivalent of each car amount is wrong  it should read  £174.
    2222    (yyyy)   Lease deduction of £721.04 not appearing in box  (amount paid by employee for private use)
    It is showing  £438.04   It seams that the lease deduction has been reduced down by the lump sum payment.  (721.04-283.00  = 438.04)
    Therefore the cash equivalent of each car amount is wrong  it should read  £1288
    Thanks & Regards
    Githa
    Edited by: PGVani on Jun 13, 2009 11:34 AM
    Edited by: PGVani on Jun 13, 2009 11:58 AM

    HI Gita,
    Let us start from the beginning.
    1) Is Company Car Infotype maintained for the two employees? Company Car INfotype is 0442. It used to be 222 earlier. If you are using anything newer than 4.5 B, this is likely to be 0442 in your case?
    2) If yes, is the following field maintained - "Regular Payments". This field is found in the "Price and Benefit" tab of IT 0442.
    3) If the field is maintained, is this payment being processed in Payroll? If you are not the person who built this system, you must ask the person who did or refer to any documentation such as BUsiness Blueprint or Configuration Document to identify this wagtype. You can also simulate a payroll and look into the log to identify which wagetype is being used. A simple  way is to glance through the RT and find a wagetype with the exact amount entered in this field. You will need to confirm by running various tests by changing the value etc.
    4) If you find the wagetype, can you please check in table v_512w_d to see whether Cumulation Class 34 is flagged for this wagetype.
    All the above will help find out what is wrong, but to rectify it may be slightly difficult at this stage as you have very little time before the due date for submission of P11D. Depending on what you find, it may be necessary to run a payroll to fully rectify. Do you have time to run another payroll before July 19th?

  • UK flex Holidays/PTO paid benefits

    Has anyone done worked with sap Benefits on configuring where EE can sell and buy certain number of the days? requirement is An employee with 25 days holiday will be eligible now for 33 days holiday (25 + 8). they can buy up to a total of 40 days off or sell down to 32, but they have to take 32 days as holiday, and canu2019t take more than 40, total. They can either buy 8 or have 40 days off. OR they can sell 8 days but not lower than 32 days off. Payroll is in ADP and time management is in sap. We have quota types and absence type configuired for this benefit plan....any information onactual configuration will be valuable as I have already started the configuration....Thanks already

  • How to restrict vendor open items to be picked to 45 during F110 process

    Hi experts,
    My client want to restrict vendor open items to be picked to 45 max during F110 payment run for each vendor.
    For example: If vendor " xyz" is having 60 open items at the time of payment run, it should allow max  to pick only 45 open items and generate one clearing document during payment run F110.
    Kindly give me any suggestions weather it is possible or not.
    Thanks & regards,
    Raghul

    hi ,
    Thanks for your quick reply.
    Actually we are using only payment method C- check.
    We have developed ZFORM and ZPROGRAM by copying standard form F110_PRENUM_CHCK  and std prog RFFOUS_C.
    In My ZFORM only single page is there with invoice details in main window ( upper side ) and check in the below page.
    when i had taken print on  pre printed stationary sample i came to know in main window at maximum 45 items details can be dispalyed in first page with  total amt check in below  for each vendor.
    Its works fine if each vendor has open items  below 45 during payment run.
    If any of the vendor is having more than 45 open items then 2 pages are printing.
    For ex: if vendor having 60 open items.
    For Ex : In first page 45 invoices details with  say total invoice amt 30,000 is printing check with same amt.
              in second page remaining 15 invoices with say total invoice amt of this 15 inovices is 5000 amt is printing check with 35,000 Instead of 5,000.
    We are not using void check concept here as my client dont want to waste checks.
    thansk & regards,
    Raghul.

  • Open items of Vendor are not getting processed in F110

    Hi Experts,
    "KR" documents posted in the month of April and I can see Vendor open Items in FBL1N for a particular vendor.
    When processing payment through F110, no open items can be taken for the vendor neither they are displayed when I tried in ZFB05 (Post with clearing) in process open items. In ZFB05 system says: " No line items"
    Where is the problem? Please help.
    - Nilesh

    Hi,
    Here might be lot of  reaons.
    1. May be they are not reached to due date.
    2. May be same vendor blocked to some other proposal
    3.May be those items have payment block
    4. May be Sepal GL Accounts not assign to All company coed Configuration
    5. Invoice posted into different Payment method and payment terms
    6. Please check the FBZP Configuration
    Regards,
    Surendra.

  • F110 doesn't clear vendor open items. Interad it creates one more entry.

    Hi!
    This is the problem I have. I run F110, proposal is great, payment is great, check is printer. Check in FCHR is created.
    I go back to FBL1N - open item is still there! More that that - another open item with document type - ZP is there, but it showed up as additional open item - not clearing item. When I click on it  - accounting document shows me : Clearing date 12/03/2008 - and same document number.
    Why doesn't it clear it and it still says OVERDUE???
    And of course, I can not post check cashed because of that in FCHR.
    Please let me know.
    Thanks!!!!!

    Hi,
    In FBZP transaction code while configuring The Automatic Outgoing payment, In Payment methods in country Tab under posting control What are document type you have defined for
    Document type for Payment and Clearing document type ? generally it should be same , normally KZ
    The payment for which F110 was executed , Is it a down payment to vendors?
    Pleease Check it.
    With Regards,
    Sudipto

  • F110  - payment on vendor open items as of a prior week

    Hello,
    I am trying to run F110 to pay vendor 1000's open items as of jan 2nd. Can anyone please tell me what how can I restrict the F110 to pick open items as of Jan 2nd? Do i enter it in the "docs entered upto" field? I have tried that and that doesnt seem to work.
    Also how does the Free selection tab work?
    My client ran FBL1N for vendor 1000 - open item as of Jan 8th - then sorts by payment date of Jan 2nd and these are the items that we are trying to pay using F110 - not sure how to bring it in F110 as it brings a lot more stuff than that needed.
    Thanks.

    Hi Anusha,
    For that you can do through this way
    In F110 there is one option that is  next payment date 
    If you will give there 9th Jan date system will pick all open item from run date to 8thJan
    So you can pick all open items through this way.
    Free Selection tab is working for inculsive and exculsive for field selcetion
    If it is Inclusive system sorted that for selection
    If it is Exclusive system deselected for selection
    If you have any doubt feel free to ask
    May be this information is useful to you
    Regards
    Surya

Maybe you are looking for