Best effort

Hi all
I have difficulty with translating of term "best effort" what does it mean?
i know that it is QoS for synchronius interface...but why "best effort". How many efforts and which of them best?

Hi !
Mikhail
XI.QualityOfService=<QualityOfService>
Specifies how the Integration Engine should process a message. The following values are permitted:
■ XI.qualityOfService=BE(Best Effort, means synchronous processing)
■ XI.qualityOfService=EO(Exactly Once, means asynchronous processing with guaranteed execution exactly once)
■ XI.qualityOfService=EOIO(Exactly Once in Order, means asynchronous processing using queues,
Best Effort --> Used for Synchronous Calls.
EO and EOIO --> Asynchronous Calls.
EOIO --> Asynchronous with Sequential Processing Guranteed.
Check this help:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/41/b714fe5ffc11d5b3ea0050da403d6a/frameset.htm
Thanks!
pls reward if useful

Similar Messages

Despite my best efforts, I am unable to remove iTunes 11.1.4 from my PC, this being made necessary because the original installation had a flaw and did not load properly. Effor to use the control panel, deleting dll. files, etc. all failed. iTune out??

Despite my best efforts, I am unable to remove iTunes 11.1.4 from my PC, this being made necessary because the original installation had a flaw and did not load properly. Effor to use the control panel, deleting dll. files, etc. all failed. And, of course, on startup, a window opens with the error and tells me find QTMovie.dll and delete it because this may be the source of the hangup. Also, in trying to delete iTunes, I get the additional message that I must get approval from the System Administrator to take this action. I am the System Administrator.
Any ideas would be welcomed.
Thank you.
James
<E-mail Edited by Host>

Thank you for asking this question. I'm having the same issues.
Liz

Http sender adapter: QoS is interpreted as Best Effort by PI 7.11

Hi
I have a scenario, where I receive an xml OrderResponse via an http sender adapter and I then map it to an iDoc which is sent to the backend system.
BUT: for some reason, PI thinks, that the Quality of Service is BE, and I get the error "Only asynchronous processing supported for IDoc adapter outbound processg".
I have checked both the http sender adapter, the sender agreement, the interface mapping, the service interface and the operation mapping and nowhere can I see, that best effort is selected.
The OrderResponse is sent from an external partner and is routed through a load balancer and an SAP web dispatcher before arriving to PI.
Any suggestions would be highly appreciated.
MIkael Lund

The external partner is sending the OrderResponse to this URL (external URL):
https://xxxxxx.xxxxxxxx.dk/sap/xi/adapter_plain?service=LM&namespace=http://xxxxxxxx.dk/XCBL/OrderResponse&interface=xCBLOrderResponse35Out
this URL is being translated to an internal URL:
https://yyyyyyy.yyyyyyy.dk/sap/xi/adapter_plain?service=LM&namespace=http://xxxxxxxx.dk/XCBL/OrderResponse&interface=xCBLOrderResponse35Out
So how should the external and/or internal URL be altered?
Thanks for a very quick answer by the way
MIkael

How to set a query of VO in Best-Effort Mode

Hi, I'm using auto refresh property of VO, to refresh the LOV . But i get " java.sql.SQLException: ORA-29983: Unsupported query for Continuous Query Notification" error..
So i want to set the query in best-effort-mode . May i know how to set it.
here is my query that set to auto refresh.
"SELECT DISTINCT YYYY FROM XXXXX"
Query optimizer makes the above one as below.
SELECT * FROM (SELECT DISTINCT YYYY FROM XXXXX) QRSLT WHERE ( ( (YYYY LIKE :vc_temp_1 ) ) )

If you disconnect the PMU, you will have the option to go to tristate or your previous digital state, but not ground. Forcing 0V is probably the closest you can get to a GND like behavior. The default line state is tristate for this device, which will leave the line floating if there is no active driver.
Kyle A.
National Instruments
High Speed Digital I/O Product Support Engineer - R&D

Issue with "Best Effort" QoS

Hi All,
I have an issue with the Quality of Service "Best Effort" for a Sender SOAP Adapter. The interface is a synchronous SOAP - to - Proxy scenario.
Q1 - How does Best Effort Work? If 10 users are sending the synchronous SOAP request, say to a BAPI to display orders, Will all the users get the response, ofcourse for different input Parameters? or the requests will be served first come first serve basis. For eg: user1 will get the response first and then user 2s request is processed?
Q2 - I am having issues with this scenario like sometimes the end users are getting a blank response message. The message in PI has no errors and the sync SOAP call is successfully completed. So What could possibly be the reasons for the blank responses when the BAPI's, Webservices, PI system and SOAP call everything is successful?
Request urgent assistance. Thanks a lot.
Rashmi.

Q1 - How does Best Effort Work? If 10 users are sending the synchronous SOAP request, say to a BAPI to display orders, Will all the users get the response, ofcourse for different input Parameters? or the requests will be served first come first serve basis. For eg: user1 will get the response first and then user 2s request is processed?
Best Effort is meant for synchronous communication. Unlike EOIO, Best effort will not guarantee that mesg will be processed in sequential order(one after another) the way it received. First of all, users can input concurrently (all at the same time) or one after another in very short span time difference. SAP services those users request based on the availability of work process during that runtime. BE only gurantees your message delivery and again based on the nature of the data and processing time and synchronous mode, messages will get processed based on the availability of work process during that time.
Q2 - I am having issues with this scenario like sometimes the end users are getting a blank response message. The message in PI has no errors and the sync SOAP call is successfully completed. So What could possibly be the reasons for the blank responses when the BAPI's, Webservices, PI system and SOAP call everything is successful
Due to many reasons. Are you expecting blank response instead of valid response? or you are getting blank response based on the user's request message. Since you see success mesg log everywhere, the blank response might be based on the request message. Check your mapping and see any logic that cause blank response for some messages?

Are WebJobs relying on best-effort storage analytics?

I'm trying to understand how WebJobs works to determine whether it's something we can use. I've only played around with it for an hour so I'm by no means an expert.
I've created a small simple web job which just processes blobs in a specific container, like this:
public static void ProcessBlob([BlobTrigger("container/{name}")] TextReader input, string name)
string s = input.ReadToEnd();
It runs fine in a console app I use for testing. I use Fiddler to monitor the http traffic it produces.
In Fiddler I see that it accesses the $logs container in the storage account. If I understand everything correctly, the data in this container is generated by Storage Analytics described here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/azure/hh343262.aspx
When reading that page about storage analytics, I see the following statement:
"Requests are logged on a best-effort basis."
It sounds to me like there's no guarantee that all requests will be logged and it's not really clear what may
cause it to fail. And if I understand WebJobs properly, it relies on all requests being logged. So
the picture I get is that WebJobs are "best-effort" as well and sometimes it might not be executed for blobs.
Is my understanding correct, or am I missing something?
Nitramafve

Thanks Girish!
Also thanks Frank, but what you write does not seem to be entirely correct. I understand that WebJobs are a piece of code that can be run on demand. But before starting to use it, I wanted to understand exactly how WebJobs actually works. I've been
working with Azure Storage for 4 years and know that there is no documented robust way to get notifications when a change is made to blob storage. Based on that, it seemed to me that implementing WebJobs on top of Azure Storage would be hard, unless there
were some undocumented Azure services it was relying on.
So I digged into the Azure WebJobs source code and monitored its request towards Azure Storage, and saw that it was relying on Azure Storage Analytics logs to determine what blobs have been created/updated (so that it can trigger the code execution). Internally
within the Azure WebJobs SDK assemblies, there's code which is designed to parse Azure Storage Analytics (the class StorageAnalyticsLogParser)
This is what does not add up. Azure WebJobs appars to be relying on Azure Storage Analytics, but Azure Storage Analytics is documented as best-effort, which would mean that Azure WebJobs would not always work properly.
But I'm sure I'm missing something here. Maybe Storage Analytics is actually "robust" and not best-effort.
Nitramafve

File Adapter Best Effort...how come?

Hi !
While reading the File Adapter online documentation, it says that it supports Best Effort as QoS...?? I though that QoS = BE is for synchronous interfaces...in what case the File Adapter could work in sync mode?
Tnx,
Matias

Matias,
A classical use case of when you can use a QOS of BE in the file adapter is,
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=3084724&messageID=3075228
If you look into my response in this thread, the RequestResponseBean is used to change the QOS of file adapter from EO to BE . If you select the QOS as BE in the File Adapter you need not use this module.
Have not given this a shot though!
Regards
Bhavesh

QoS issue: Specify Best Effort, but message header contains Exactly Once

I'm using a SOAP sender Adapter to process messages. I specify Quality of Service as "Best Effort" in the adapter, but whenever a message comes in, it has this in the header:
<SAP:QualityOfService>ExactlyOnce</SAP:QualityOfService>
I cannot change this and it is stopping the process working (it works in test but behaves like this in production).
If I send in a test message the from the Configuration and Monitoring home page, I can set "Best Effort" there and it appears correctly in the header. The process works then.
How can it be that even though the adapter is specified as "Best Effort", the message has "ExactlyOnce" in the header?

Hi,
I did both of those; it is coming through the correct channel, and the flush of the cache didn't help.
Anyway, thanks for proposing.
BR,
Tony.

SIGBUS 10 bus error" & "Inconsistent thread : best efforts attempt (may fail)

We are using Weblogic 5.1 (no service pack installd) on SUN Solaris.
Suddenly weblogic server was down & in log file
we found the "SIGBUS 10 bus error" & "Inconsistent thread : best efforts
attempt (may fail)" errors (see below for full errors in log file).
We have executeThreadCount=100 in properties file.
Is it known problem/bug with solaris?
thanks,
-ravi
Tue Jun 06 15:30:55 PDT 2000:<E> <ServletContext-General> Cannot find
resource 'javascript/stub.rmf' in document root
'/qa/weblogic/p4root/website/htdocs-portal'
SIGBUS 10 bus error
si_signo [10]: BUS
si_errno [0]:
si_code [1]: BUS_ADRALN [addr: 0xd81eb71d]
stackpointer=C99D0D80
Inconsistent thread : best efforts attempt (may fail)
"Thread-36" (TID:0x4e92320, sys_thread_t:0x4e92258, state:CW, thread_t:
t@202, threadID:0xc8ae1dd8, stack_bottom:0xc8ae2000, stack_size:0x20000)
prio=5
[1] java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:424)
[2] javax.mail.EventQueue.dequeue(EventQueue.java:73)
[3] javax.mail.EventQueue.run(EventQueue.java:93)
[4] java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:478)
Inconsistent thread : best efforts attempt (may fail)
"SeedGenerator Thread" (TID:0x4994508, sys_thread_t:0x4994440, state:CW,
thread_t: t@118, threadID:0xc8ab1dd8, stack_bottom:0xc8ab2000,
stack_size:0x20000) prio=1
[1] java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:424)
[2] sun.security.provider.SeedGenerator.run(SeedGenerator.java:107)
[3] java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
Inconsistent thread : best efforts attempt (may fail)
"SSLListenThread" (TID:0x4381688, sys_thread_t:0x43815c0, state:R, thread_t:
t@114, threadID:0xc8b41dd8, stack_bottom:0xc8b42000, stack_size:0x20000)
prio=5
[1] java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method)
[2] java.net.PlainSocketImpl.accept(PlainSocketImpl.java:406)
[3] java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(ServerSocket.java:238)
[4] java.net.ServerSocket.accept(ServerSocket.java:223)
[5]
weblogic.security.SSL.SSLServerSocket.acceptNoHandshake(SSLServerSocket.java
:121)
[6] weblogic.security.SSL.SSLServerSocket.accept(SSLServerSocket.java:112)
[7] weblogic.t3.srvr.ListenThread.run(ListenThread.java:226)

Hi Steve,
We are also not getting that error on NT. We are not getting SIGBUS error
at particular point/place. Randomly (approx after 30 min)
the server will give this SIGBUS error & shutdowns.
I tried with -native option with JAVA VM also. Still we are getting the same
error.
We are using ORACLE8.1.5 with Weblogic's OCI driver.
I feel this problem may be related to "jdk1.2.2_05a" on Solaris!!
Weblogic guys: Will weblogic supports jdk1.2.2_05a on Solaris?
thanks
-ravi
Steve Rogers <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Ravi, I am developing on WL 4.5.1 and solaris 2.6 with SIGBUS 10 erroralso
(I also have jdk 1.2.2_05a) I do NOT think it has anything to do withthis,
java always runs with -native on, infact you cannot turn it off. I am
using HTMLkona, and getting this (from the thread dump) in
weblogic.html.OptionElement.
Do you know where yours is coming from?
I have been hacking at this for 3 days, and have submitted to
[email protected] as well. I still cannot figure out why this happens. The
really strange thing is, it WORKS on Windows NT.
Please respond, maybe we can help each other solve this problem.
Thanks
Steve Rogers
[email protected]
"Ravi Kumar.T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
We are using Weblogic 5.1 (no service pack installd) on SUN Solaris.
Suddenly weblogic server was down & in log file
we found the "SIGBUS 10 bus error" & "Inconsistent thread : best efforts
attempt (may fail)" errors (see below for full errors in log file).
We have executeThreadCount=100 in properties file.
Is it known problem/bug with solaris?
thanks,
-ravi
Tue Jun 06 15:30:55 PDT 2000:<E> <ServletContext-General> Cannot find
resource 'javascript/stub.rmf' in document root
'/qa/weblogic/p4root/website/htdocs-portal'
SIGBUS 10 bus error
si_signo [10]: BUS
si_errno [0]:
si_code [1]: BUS_ADRALN [addr: 0xd81eb71d]
stackpointer=C99D0D80
Inconsistent thread : best efforts attempt (may fail)
"Thread-36" (TID:0x4e92320, sys_thread_t:0x4e92258, state:CW, thread_t:
t@202, threadID:0xc8ae1dd8, stack_bottom:0xc8ae2000, stack_size:0x20000)
prio=5
[1] java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:424)
[2] javax.mail.EventQueue.dequeue(EventQueue.java:73)
[3] javax.mail.EventQueue.run(EventQueue.java:93)
[4] java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:478)
Inconsistent thread : best efforts attempt (may fail)
"SeedGenerator Thread" (TID:0x4994508, sys_thread_t:0x4994440, state:CW,
thread_t: t@118, threadID:0xc8ab1dd8, stack_bottom:0xc8ab2000,
stack_size:0x20000) prio=1
[1] java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:424)
[2] sun.security.provider.SeedGenerator.run(SeedGenerator.java:107)
[3] java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
Inconsistent thread : best efforts attempt (may fail)
"SSLListenThread" (TID:0x4381688, sys_thread_t:0x43815c0, state:R,thread_t:
t@114, threadID:0xc8b41dd8, stack_bottom:0xc8b42000, stack_size:0x20000)
prio=5
[1] java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method)
[2] java.net.PlainSocketImpl.accept(PlainSocketImpl.java:406)
[3] java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(ServerSocket.java:238)
[4] java.net.ServerSocket.accept(ServerSocket.java:223)
[5]
weblogic.security.SSL.SSLServerSocket.acceptNoHandshake(SSLServerSocket.java
:121)
[6]weblogic.security.SSL.SSLServerSocket.accept(SSLServerSocket.java:112)
[7] weblogic.t3.srvr.ListenThread.run(ListenThread.java:226)

Best Effort Resequening in SOA Mediator

Hello,
I am trying to implementing best effort resequencing in mediator, our set up is
source table: notification_queue, it has these fields
id(possible value: UUID)
priority(possible value: 1 or 2)
uun(possible value: s12, s22, s34 etc. id for an identity)
xml(possible value: it holds our business data as xml)
date_modified(the date/time this row is inserted)
A DBAdapter is created to constantly poll above table, we set as 10 rows per poll, and these 10 rows are passed into mediator then bpel process to process.
We implemented best effort resequencing in mediator, we aim to let the mediator sort the data i.e. 10 rows in correct order, the configuration is
Group by: uun
ID by: priority
For example, if the data in the table are
row 1: uun S12 with priority 1
row 2: uun S32 with priority 2
row 3: uun S12 with priority 2
row 4: uun S32 with priority 1
After DBAdapter picks this up and mediator resequences it according to Group by: uun, ID by: priority, it should have
S12 - 1
S12 - 2
S32 - 1
S32 - 2
or
S32 - 1
S32 - 2
S12 - 1
S12 - 2
so it should group by uun, and order by priority as above(we don't care if S12 comes first or S32 comes first, as long as they are grouped together and the order within the group is correct)
What I've seen the actual results are just random without any resequencing ...
The problem is more than likely is either (1). mediator resequencing doesn't work as advertised or (2). our mediator configuration is incorrect, but again, there isn't much to be configured apart from setting Group and ID.
Does anyone successfully implemented Best Effort Resequencing in Mediator? Any help is much appreciated.
Thank you in advance,
Best Regards,
Michael

Hello S.Ananth,
Thanks for your suggestion!
I tried to set Max Rows to 1 in Best Effort resequencer, and inserted the following rows in order
insert into NOTIFICATION_QUEUE(ROW_ID, UUN, NOTIFICATION_PRIORITY, XML)
values('1', 'S12', '2', 'S12-2');
commit;
insert into NOTIFICATION_QUEUE(ROW_ID, UUN, NOTIFICATION_PRIORITY, XML)
values('2', 'S12', '3', 'S12-3');
commit;
insert into NOTIFICATION_QUEUE(ROW_ID, UUN, NOTIFICATION_PRIORITY, XML)
values('3', 'S12', '1', 'S12-1');
commit;
insert into NOTIFICATION_QUEUE(ROW_ID, UUN, NOTIFICATION_PRIORITY, XML)
values('4', 'S23', '1', 'S23-1');
commit;
insert into NOTIFICATION_QUEUE(ROW_ID, UUN, NOTIFICATION_PRIORITY, XML)
values('5', 'S23', '3', 'S23-3');
commit;
insert into NOTIFICATION_QUEUE(ROW_ID, UUN, NOTIFICATION_PRIORITY, XML)
values('6', 'S23', '2', 'S23-2');
commit;
I set Group by UUN, ID by notification_prioirty, Max row as 1, I run a few tests, results are random, for example
S12-1
S23-1
S23-3
S23-2
S12-2
S12-3
S23 is not sorted as expected, (1-3-2)...
Regarding of Standard Resequencer option, unfortunately we can not used it, our real real case have prioirty 1 to 10, and and it is not incrementing by 1, for example, 1,3,4,7,8.
Best Regards,
Michael

Mac G5 ***** - Classic OS9 System Support won't load despite best efforts

Very Frustrated PC user - trying to switch to Mac. I have G5 iMac with OS 10.4.3. I am simply trying to install my wife's new Casio digital camera software which needs Classic to work.
What the F? Every PC known to man is backwards compatible; why not the "easiest computer in the world," aka Mac?
So, I have the installer disc for OS9 System Support and everytime I try to install it, it stops in the middle and reads "The application Installer quit unexpectedly."
Any suggestions?
iMac G5 Mac OS X (10.4.3)

I'd like to add to the woes. Last summer I purchased
a G5 tower (on eBay) that had 10.3 on it. I needed to
transfer my data, older applications, and System
folder from my B/W G3 (400 MHz) over to the G5 in a
Classic folder. One of the forums here said to use an
Ethernet cable to make the transfer. The good news:
my data from the old computer transferred.
That was the good news. The bad news: even though I
transferred it, I actually created two different
Classic folders. Now, it will only open one of them.
And, in addition, each time Classic attempts to
mount, I get an error message:
"The system software on the startup disk only
functions on the original media, not if copied to
another drive."
You get that error message if you copy the System Folder from the system CD onto a hard drive. The System Folder on a CD contains a special version of the System file which will not work on a hard drive. You should delete that System Folder forthwith.
So, I guess I have several questions:
1) May I delete the two folders that have Classic in
them?
Just kill the one copied from the CD.
2) If so, how may I do so safely?
put the System file somewhere else, put the System Folder into the Trash, reboot, empty the Trash, put the System file into the Trash, empty the Trash.
3) Since I still need Classic for some applications
(that I'm too poor/cheap to spend the money to
upgrade), and since the disks I received with the
computer didn't have Classic on them at all,
If you got the original system discs, you got a disc which has Classic. There will be an alias specifically set to install Classic.
what is
the best way to get Classic installed on this
machine?
May I also introduce an unrelated problem? This G5
tower, as purchased, was partitioned. It has a system
partition and a regular partition. Is there a way for
me to have no partitions without wiping the drive
clean first?
No. When you repartition it you kill the current partitions.
Many thanks!!!
Joe C.
Springfield, IL
(Mac user since 1984)
PowerMac G5 Mac OS X (10.3.9)
PowerMac G5
Mac OS X (10.3.9)

Best Effort (BE) Quality Service in JDBC & Mail Sender Adapter

Hi Experts,
I have confusion for Mail & JDBC Sender adapters.
Why BE QoS is provided in the sender JDBC & Mail Adapters. Can anybody explain me with how will be Synchronous JDBC or Mail scenario.
Thanks in advance.
Abdur

Use of BE in JDBC can be seen here
http://www.klickklack.wg.am/RFC_Request_Response_without_BPM.doc
For mail sender, usually there are no such logical requirement.
Regards,
Prateek

Async interfaces, PI7.1 is running sync (Best Effort) scenario (SOAP Adapt)

Hi guys,
I'm facing a strange issue. I have set-up an asynchronous SOAP->FIle scenario on PI 7.1 using asynchronous service interfaces (not 3.0, but standard stateless) and the system is running a sync scenario. Is this a standard behaviour on 7.1?
I have 1 outbound async interface with 2 methods (i'm not sure if this is possible with the SOAP adpter, I'm trying it) and 1 inbound async with 2 methods.
Any explanation for this?
Thank you, Olian

Hello Shabarish, hello Prema,
thanks a lot for your quick help. I think this problem will be solved. Both of you are right. I used the WSDL wizard of ID to generate the WSDL file and used the system proposed URL. But I forgot to set the QoS.
I will try it tomorrow. Both of you helped me to solve the problem. But I can give the points to only one person. So I have to give them to Shabarish.
Thanks a lot to both of you.
Xiang

Despite best efforts, cannot modify link colors in iWeb

I am having issues with changing the colors of my hyperlinks in iWeb. Specifically, I having this problem while working with the "Welcome" page in the "Modern" style template.
After searching through this forum, I followed advice to check out http://www.rowan-cottage.co.uk/Site/CSS%20in%20iWeb.html for tips on modifying the CSS and changing the hyperlink colors. While I was able to edit the .css file and change the unfollowed link colors to blue as planned, the followed link colors unexpectly changed to a strange purple color. Hovering was the same purple, but clicking the link and not releasing the mouse resulted in the link turning red (the default color) even after I had edited the .css file so that hover and followed links were to also be the same blue.
I reloaded the page several times, I reset Safari, I looked at the page with Opera, Firefox, and IE, and it looked the same way in all browsers.
Does anyone know what is going on here? Is there some sort of communication going on behind the scene that I am not seeing (such as, if unfollowed link = blue, then followed link = purple)? Do I need to edit the XML file? How?
Advice appreciated! Thanks!
iMac (PowerPC) Mac OS X (10.4.4)

Okay, that was yesterday.
Today the problem is not repeating.
I have no idea what happened, but I as long as the problem is presently gone, I'm happy.

Is this really the best I'm going to get?

2 years with BT and had awful connection and speed issues, many numerous long calls to India doing first line tests, mostly being told that I would receive a call back and never do. Recently informed of an upgrade at the exchange but speeds dipped since and have not been any better since.
Been reading these forums for a while, I am plugged into master socket, the one with BT Openreach logo on, ring wire removed, connected for over 3 days, no other phones in sockets. I was always told as I am 1.6k from the exchange speeds were not to be great but next door shows as 4-6k, I'm lucky to have dial up speeds most of the time.
It appears that other people within feet of me are having decent speeds, mostly via Talk Talk I hasten to add but was told that it would make no difference as BT are the main supplier.
The quiet line check appears in order, no noises or crackles seems a little quiet but reported that online a week ago but not heard anything since.
I would be grateful and see from your experience is this really the best I'm going to get?
ADSL Line StatusConnection information
Line state:
Connected
Connection time:
3 days, 23:30:49
Downstream:
1,920 Kbps
Upstream:
448 Kbps
ADSL settings
VPI/VCI:
0/38
Type:
PPPoA
Modulation:
G.992.1 Annex A
Latency type:
Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up):
13.5 dB / 15.0 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up):
55.5 dB / 31.5 dB
Output power (Down/Up):
16.8 dBm / 12.6 dBm
FEC Events (Down/Up):
468069285 / 1845
CRC Events (Down/Up):
1578613 / 1771
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Link (Remote):
0
HEC Errors (Down/Up):
738099 / 1160
Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
More Details
Hide Details
To reset back to the default BT Total Broadband username and password, click the 'Reset username' button.
Reset username
Applying...
WAN StatusConnection information
Line state:
Disconnected
Connection time:
Not available
Software version V100R001C01B031SP09_L_B | Time & date 13:51 08/04/2012
Here's part of the BT speed test, still waiting................
1. Best Effort Test: -provides background information.
Download Speed
11 Kbps
0 Kbps
2 Mbps Max Achievable Speed
Download speedachieved during the test was - 11 Kbps For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 800 Kbps-2 Mbps. IP Profile for your line is - 1.69 Mbps
2. Upstream Test: -provides background information.
Upload Speed
370 Kbps
0 Kbps
448 Kbps Max Achievable Speed
Upload speed achieved during the test was - 370Kbps Additional Information: Upstream Rate IP profile on your line is - 448 Kbps
This test was not conclusive and further testing is required.This might be useful for your Broadband Service Provider to investigate the fault.
If you wish to carry out further tests,please click on 'Continue' button.If not, please close the window using 'Exit' button and contact your ISP for further assistance with these results.
The speed is extremely slow today, however this is nothing new as dips in and out constantly. I have left the BT Homehub 3 connected to the master socket, hopefully anyone able to assist??
Thanks
Mark

Hi you are 4km from your exchange that is your line length as you have been connected 3days + and your noise margin is high i will suggest you contact the forum mods and request a noise margin reset to the default 6db this is a link to them
http://bt.custhelp.com/app/contact_email/c/4951
they normally reply by email or phone directly to you within 3 working days
They are a UK based BT specialist team who have a good record at getting problems solved
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

Best effort

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for