Best kilometer rate is LESS than average

I have just bought the Nike sports plus kit and have noticed that the best kilometer rate in my history is actually SLOWER than the average rate listed in my workout. Does anyone know why/how to fix?

can't I just change the "Easy Setup" settings so it would work without degrading the input and subsequently the output? Sorry, I don't quite grasp "fixed-resolution" yet so may be asking something that doesn't have an answer.
FCE only works with certain presets available in the Easy Setup menu. If your footage isn't one of these resolutions then FCE will conform it to the sequence you have selected, downgrading the footage in the process. Final Cut Pro gives you the option to make a sequence set to the dimensions you want it to be, without worrying about whether your image matches a preset.

Similar Messages

Designing a board using Artix-7 FPGA where power rail (1.0V = VCCINT, VCCBRAM, MGTAVCC) ramp rate is less than 200usec (min spec)

I have a board design that uses Artix-7 FPGA (without using the GPT interface) where VCCINT, VCCBRAM, and MGTAVCC rails are tied together to one VRM source of 1.0V. The power sequence is correct (VCCINT>VCCBRAM>VCCAUX>VCCO), but the ramp rate of the 1.0V rails is less than the spec.
Currently the 1.0V ramp rate of this design is a high power VRM design that demostrates a ramp rate (100usec) < than the min spec (200usec).
Since I am new using this device; what is the risk involved on violating this spec if any? I need to know ASAP as this might drive a board spin.
Thanks for your support,
-cb

Hi,
The specifications for the device ramp rate are developed based on limitations of our test equipment, not limitations of our parts. The 0.2 ms ramp rate specification is specified because the tester we have does not allow for faster ramp rates.
However, this is still a violation of our specifications so we cannot guarantee there will not be any reliability issues with the device (since we have not tested this condition).
The silicon itself does not have any problems with faster ramp rates.
Issues exist when ramp rates are non-monotonic or have excessive ringing, but this will be a limitation with any vendor's silicon and will need to be accounted for in any system.

FCE output quality is less than average :-(

I really hope someone can help, I'm under a crunch to complete some software tutorials and all my trials result is average to POOR quality.
*Here's the scoop* (I am testing this with only a 24sec. video):
*Using ScreenFlow >>* I am capturing my screen to create the tutorials. I am outputting them as: Web-High (best quality) H.264 multi-pass video encoding at 850 kbits/sec., AAC stereo at 96 kbits/sec., scale 100% or 1440x900 +(realizing the higher quality out the better so I can convert/compress down to flv 720X format/size and still end up with some quality)+. I've also kept the size the same throughout the process below, to no avail +(again rather go "down" to 720X so I don't lose quality, this is the desired final size for our software demo videos)+.
In Quicktime it looks absolutely awesome, clear, and the sound is perfect. I could stop here and convert these to flash for our site but I need to add intro/outros to "dress them up" and describe each tutorial. NOW...
*In Final Cut Express >>* I import the xxx.mov file in along with audio, etc. When finished with intro/outro/transitions I: 1) set mark in/mark out, then, sequence > render all(all checked). 2) File > Export > Using QuickTime Conversion > and used Default, Broadband-High and Broadband-Medium,
and I've tried every setting in "QuickTime Movie" format as well as "Flash Video FLV" and NOTHING looks worth a darn.
If anyone has any suggestions, or is local in Scottsdale, AZ and wants to work for an hour Fri or Sat (yes paid, LOL), i could really use the help.
Thanks so much up front for any help-direction! Cheers.

can't I just change the "Easy Setup" settings so it would work without degrading the input and subsequently the output? Sorry, I don't quite grasp "fixed-resolution" yet so may be asking something that doesn't have an answer.
FCE only works with certain presets available in the Easy Setup menu. If your footage isn't one of these resolutions then FCE will conform it to the sequence you have selected, downgrading the footage in the process. Final Cut Pro gives you the option to make a sequence set to the dimensions you want it to be, without worrying about whether your image matches a preset.

Changing web server refresh to less than one second

I just set up another PC on our network to display our engine test VI. Is there any way to increase the refresh rate to less than one second. I tried entering .5 sec on the config screen, but it changed back to one second. I'm using LabVIEW 8.5.1.
Thanks,
Todd Munsell
Wood Group Pratt & Whitney Industrial Turbine Services
Todd Munsell
Turbine Engine Test Technician/IT Tech
Wood Group Pratt & Whitney Industrial Turbine Services, LLC
Plattsburgh, NY

Thanks again. I'll try that.
BTW, I just spoke with out rep from Daytronic Corp. who was testing the comm cards with his System 10 and PC. They worked fine for him. The only difference is that he is using LabVIEW 7.0 and we are using 8.5.1. They don't have any subVIs written for the newer LV versions. That may be the cause the the issue we're having with using the comm cards to access the DAQ. They do not have the time or money to update their subVIs for the newer LV versions, but I'd have to think that there is a way to change them myself to make them work. Ideally, I want to use a modified version of the app I'm using on another PC without having to bother with the network to pass the data. I already have a cable made to connect the other PC to the System 10.
I almost forgot something.... I found a version 8 System 10 subVI package using the NI search, but it didn't work either.
Do you know what might have changed in the newer LV versions that could cause this issue? I've attached a zip file of their subVIs. Like I mentioned earlier, LV works fine using the main (built-in) comm port on the System 10 DAQ. It's just the additional cards that do not work correctly. They seem to establish the comm link OK, but the binary data that the System 10 sends is not interpreted and displayed correctly. It's usually all gibberish on the screen.
Of the Daytronic subVIs, the subVI that I use to test with is the "example.vi", which is used for binary data.
The "simple terminal" subVI works fine, but I can't use it to test the data link since it's configured differently.
When I use the main System 10 comm port, the simple terminal doens't work and the example.vi does. Why wouldn't it work with the other ports/cards?
Could you please check these out when you have the time and see if you can find something that isn't configured correctly? I may be overlooking something obvious, since I'm still learning LV.
Thanks
Message Edited by tmunsell on 07-28-2008 09:18 PM
Todd Munsell
Turbine Engine Test Technician/IT Tech
Wood Group Pratt & Whitney Industrial Turbine Services, LLC
Plattsburgh, NY
Attachments:
labvdr7.zip ‏891 KB

Can anyone confirm if you can in fact shoot/edit (perhaps using a less than best video setting) on a Canon XA20 or Sony HXR-NX30U with iMovie 10 (Mavericks)? I do not want to convert files. Thx.

Can anyone confirm if you can in fact shoot/edit (perhaps using a less than best video setting) on a Canon XA20 or Sony HXR-NX30U with iMovie 10 (Mavericks)? I do not want to convert files. Thx.

Hi road.north,
Welcome to the Support Communities!
The article below will help you determine which cameras are supported for iMovie '10
Apple - iLife Help - iMovie Supported Cameras
http://help.apple.com/imovie/10/cameras/en/index.html?lang=en_US
Cheers,
- Judy

Audio sample rate 192 k but seem less than that (about 20% less) when i run software defined radio .

I bought Pavilion dm4-1000au with Win7 Starter as original OS. My target is to get full Sample rate of Audio 192 K when I ran Sofware Defined Radio like Softrock SDR. Actualy I only get less than 100% of sample rate. So, frequency coverage of SDR become less than I prefered 192 KHz.
What I have done is up dating Audio driver from HP Support/ Driver Download center only.
How to solve this problem ?.

Thank you for your input.
YES - I've seen the "right click Time Code display and switch to audio units timeline solution - yet audio units do NOT appear as an option for me...hence all of this drama.
ADOBE - do I have a munged install? Any other advice? We keep a clean system (Mac Pro 10.6.11 or whatever is last iteration of SL). I guess I could try installing into a new User and see if it behaves any differently.
Sigh...we bailed on FCP7 after trying FCPX and also passed on going to Avid MC. Hope PP is reliable for our work flow...again thx for all help.
PCG

Best home hub 5 alternative for less than £50.

is there any router that will work on infinity for less than £50. one that has Qos? sick off lagging even when someones on youtube, its ridiculous.

Apparently, Qualcomm have a chipset with Streamboost, especially for gamers http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/lanwan/lanwan-features/32297-does-qualcomms-streamboost-really-work
If you found this post helpful, please click on the star on the left
If not, I'll try again

Small office with less than 10 APs

What is best way to handle or setup wireless connection for a small branch office with less than 10 APs? Management doesn't want to spend any money to install a local WLC. Those APs will communicate back to two WLC 5508 in Data Center.
Should I use local switch or flexconnect? Any one has experience about pro and con between those two methods. Ping time between branch office and Data Center is less 60 ms.
Thanks,

What is the link bandwidth between those two site. If you have enough bandwidth then you can go for local mode deployment, but all CAPWAP traffic has to come Data Centre WLC (ie central switching)
If you would like to terminate branch traffic at branch switch, then FlexConnect local switching is the way to go.
HTH
Rasika
**** Pls rate all useful responses ****

Editing video or audio in increments LESS than 1 frame?

Case #0183085485
Updated
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 7:59:24 PM PDT
Opened
Thursday, March 15, 2012 4:54:02 PM PDT
Status
Open - Pending Adobe Response
Product
Production Premium 5.5
Support contract
Adobe Support Program
Subject
Premiere Pro CS5.5: Edit Audio
NOTES & RESPONSES
Notes from Customer
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 7:59:24 PM PDT
Once upon a time there was a princess who was very sad. She had discovered that her favorite pet guinea pig had been kidnapped by a
n evil Chihuaha named "El Diablo". You see, it turns out El Diablo could not get a straight answer from Adobe Technical Support reg
arding what seemed like an incredibly simple question. So after endless attempts to get this question answered, he went quite insan
e and started kidnapping Guinea Pigs with the diabolical plan of starting his own software support company run by Guinea Pigs as the
y could not possibly offer worse support than he had been receiving. Alas, if someone had only just replied to his futile queries i
n a precise and meaningful fashion. But they did not. And so the Guinea Pigs - they must suffer. To be continued?
Notes to Customer
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 1:06:19 PM PDT
Hi Christopher ,
Thank you for contacting Adobe Technical Support. We are responding in
reference to your case regarding Adobe Premiere Pro .
We would be happy to assist and assure you with the best possible
assistance regarding the case.
We also tried calling you at 01:05 pm PST but you were not available
.So please feel free to get back to us or if you would like us to give
you a call as per your availability ,please let us know of an
appropriate time to call.
Would like to know how you were able to edit the audio and the video
less than a frame in the earlier versions of adobe premiere pro.
You can also visit www.adobe.com/go/supportportal for any assistance
regarding Adobe products. You may also visit www.forums.adobe.com as
it?s a useful resource for self-help.
We are always here to assist you. Please contact us at 800 833 6687 IVR
Options 2-3 if you have any questions or need an update on your case.
Thanks & Regards,
Anish
Adobe Technical Support
Notes from Customer
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 11:21:19 AM PDT
REALLY? I spent an hour on the phone with your top support people and you still can't give me a definitive answer on this unless I
post in other forums? WHAT is so hard about answering this simple question? Thank you!
Please confirm that it is currently IMPOSSIBLE to edit audio or video in Premiere Pro 5.5 to measurements LESS THAN 1 frame.
Notes to Customer
Monday, March 19, 2012 3:36:49 PM PDT
Hi Christopher ,
Thank you for contacting Adobe Technical Support. We are responding in
reference to your case regarding Premiere Pro .
We would be happy to assist and assure you with the best possible
assistance regarding the case.
We also tried calling you at 03:35 pm PST but you were not available .So
please feel free to get back to us or if you would like us to give you a
call as per your availability ,please let us know of an appropriate time
to call.
You can also visit www.adobe.com/go/supportportal for any assistance
regarding Adobe products. You may also visit www.forums.adobe.com as
it?s a useful resource for self-help.
We are always here to assist you. Please contact us at 800 833 6687 IVR
Options 2-3 if you have any questions or need an update on your case.
Thanks & Regards,
Anish
Adobe Technical Support
Notes from Customer
Sunday, March 18, 2012 8:12:20 AM PDT
Please confirm that it is currently IMPOSSIBLE to edit audio or video in Premiere Pro 5.5 to measurements LESS THAN 1 frame.
It appears in versions prior to CS5.0 one could select AUDIO UNITS by right clicking timecode display to edit audio (and presumably
video for that matter) to SAMPLE RATE accuracy.
Despite a long and involved support phone call including taking control of our computer by remote, it appears this is NOT currently
possible.
If this is indeed so - we will have to adjust our work flow to edit audio OUTSIDE of Premiere.
Thank you...please confirm and advise.

Thank you for your input.
YES - I've seen the "right click Time Code display and switch to audio units timeline solution - yet audio units do NOT appear as an option for me...hence all of this drama.
ADOBE - do I have a munged install? Any other advice? We keep a clean system (Mac Pro 10.6.11 or whatever is last iteration of SL). I guess I could try installing into a new User and see if it behaves any differently.
Sigh...we bailed on FCP7 after trying FCPX and also passed on going to Avid MC. Hope PP is reliable for our work flow...again thx for all help.
PCG

Two MacBook Air logic board failures in less than 8 months

Hi All,
I purchased a new MacBook Air in early 2011. 14 months later the logic board needed replacement. 8 months after that the logic board needs replacing again. I don't take the Air into extreme temperature/humidity environments. The computer has never been dropped or had anything spilled on it. This is the 4th latop I've owned since 1995, but all of my previous laptops have been PCs. Is this normal for Apple? Any suggestions on how to avoid yet anoter $280 repair (because of course the latest logic board failure is out of warranty from the initial logic board replacement 8 months ago...)?

Let me get this straight - you consider the need to have the logic board replaced twice in less then eight months on a computer that is less than two years old to be a good deal?!? Both logic board failures were diagnosed at an Apple Genius bar in person. It shouldn't matter if it was the hard drive, battery pack, or whatever. To have a major harware component and its replacement fail twice in a very short period of time is inexcuseable! I can understand the first failure - someone has to lose the quality control lottery. However, to have the exact same component need replacing twice strongly suggest shoddy manufacturing/rebuilding.
Are logic board failures so common on Mac Airs that the discussion is about the best repair price and not the frequent failure rate?

Best compression rate - help - i'm still green

Help. Can any give me an estimate for what would be a good encoding rate for a footage with a lot of movement but yet only 6 minutes.
Thanks

Is it only the portions that have been transcoded from DVD that are strobing? You have to figure that since your source DVD has been compressed to fit onto the original DVD, and the fact that DV video is already compressed 5-1, and then you are compressing it again to fit on your own DVD, there are going to be issues.
If it was me, I'd find out if I could get hold of the original tapes and recapture. Or, failing that, get hold of the original edited files. Any way you can cut out some of these compressions will only help your cause.
How did you 'pull the video' from your client's DVD? What software did you use? Every time I've done this, the result has been less than stellar. But I didn't have any strobing. This is perhaps because the DVDs I've taken footage from were generated from those DVD camcorders and bypassed some of that compression.
I do an awful lot of videos authored to DVD, which include elements from everywhere under the sun. I get digital stills, consumer MiniDV tapes, camcorder-generated DVDs, scanned photos and professionally-done MiniDV footage. And it's usually of people playing sports. Plus I add transitions like classic dissolves and such. After many tests on my system, I've come to a few conclusions:
Number one—CBR 6.7 (in DVDSP) gives me the best overall result for achieving decent motion AND decent dissolves. 2-pass schemes end up giving my dissolves a ratty look and end up making the whole video look cheesey. If you're not happy with that in your own tests, try upping the bitrate some, but I'm convinced that CBR is best for my needs 99% of the time.
Number two—I only use Maxell-R or RiData-R DVDs.
Number three—When it really counts, I burn my DVDs from a disk image in Toast as Data and on the UDF setting. And I burn it at 4x speed.
Others may debate me on a few of these, but these are the conclusions I've come to on my system, with my software. I generate hundreds of DVDs at a time and are played on every system imaginable. I rarely get one back as 'unplayable.' In fact, It's only happened once in the past year. And in that one case, it had been burned at 12x speed. Once I replaced it with the same file burned at 4x, it played fine.
Also, you read a lot of folks talking about only doing your encoding to MPEG2 through Compressor. I don't notice enough quality difference to justify the outrageous amount of time Compressor takes to encode an MPEG2 file. And, in some of my tests, DVDSP did a BETTER job.
I create the audio file in Compressor (AAC), and then replace the AIFF audio file DVDSP creates with it before dragging the audio and video into DVDSP's Graphical Menu.
I hope some of this helps you. I've learned these lessons through an awful lot of "stomach pain." I've read a lot of advice in this forum and tested it on my own system on my own projects. Your results, as they say, may vary.

Should I settle for less than what I am paying for...

A couple of months ago I upgraded to BT Infinity 1 Unlimited. The package was for speed of between 25 mb to 35mb.
As I was only getting on average 15 to 16 mb on one occasion 12.8mb. I rang and BT who sent an engineer out. On checking the HD box the engineer made improvements at the box. and now sometimes I get between19mb to 21mb. The engineer said that as the box is 436 metres away from my house I would never be able to get even the lowest speed of 25 mbps.
I have just run the BTW TEST which reads as follows
Download speed 20.90
MAX 22.9
For your connection the acceptable range of speeds is 16.3mhps--22.9mhps.
Upload speed during test 3.75mbps
Upstream rate IP profile for your line is 10mbps.
Do you think I should settle for less than what I am paying for.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Thanks for your reply,
I have been with bt for over 40 years and have great service from them. I know a lot of other users have bigger problems.
It was just that the advert on line said 25 to 35 mhps and I was hopeing that I would not have to keep watching the little circle going round and round before opening a page.
I buy and sell racecards on ebay and most times bid on things in the last few seconds and slow turning of the pages does not help. ,

Less than 0.5 mbs for a month usually 7 mbs

for about a month now ive been getting less than 0.5 mbs i normally archive an average of between 6 and 7 i phoned bt they have sent an engineer out he has changed the face plate checked the wiring changed the hub and so on and so on, it didnt make the blindest bit off difference everytime i ring bt they just "reset" my profile which does nothing i have been through every single bt test at least 8 time im going up the wall it took me an hour to download a 3mb file other night PLEASE SOMEBODY HELP
test results as i post
IP Profile for your line is - 7150 Kbps
Download speedachieved during the test was - 367 Kbps
For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 600-7150 Kbps.
Additional Information:
Your DSL Connection Rate :8128 Kbps(DOWN-STREAM), 448 Kbps(UP-STREAM)
i have the exact same problem as damien99 a few posts down he lives a few streets away from me
this is his post
For the pase two week my speeds have generally been below the acceptbale level for broadband. Yet before that everything was fine and i haven't changed anything internally that would have altered this. I have rung BT and i have had three visits from engineers. The second engineer changed the faceplate to the new kind that doesn't need a filter plugged in. I have changed ethernet cables, reformatted my PC tried all 3 versions of the home hub and tested with a different PC and nothing has made a difference. I have had my profile reset, line tests done and according to BT there is no fault anywhere for them to be able to do any further work. SO why am i achieving such dreadful speeds?? I am not that far from the exchange either.

Whem you contaced the mods usingthe contact form you should have gotten an email back with a reference, if not then you need to try again.
Damian had his card shifted to another location in the exhange hence why he has no issues now
If my post was helpful then please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the the reply answers your question fully then please select ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

Less than a month and its already broken

Dear BT and Forum users,
I am not very happy with my BB service right now and have come on here in the hope that I might get more that platitudes and fob offs.
So... a few weeks ago my husband finally gave into the sales calls and agreed to have Infinity installed. Our reason - not so much faster internet but in the hope we might get a consistant service.The service we had before that was tempermental at best and we were sick of having to reset the router every other day. (in hindsight we should have just gone with an alternative ISP).
It was installed a couple of weeks ago and worked well until last Wednesday, since then the service has been a comedy of errors. To start with my husband confirmed from the outset that they problem was not coming from inside the house but the customer service operator insisted on booking an engineer.
We agreed to the Friday morning appointment. I booked the morning off work (using annual leave) and the engineer didn't show up. My husband called at 12.30 (they won't take calls from me as I'm not on the bill) and he was assured the appointment was booked in. Shortly after 1 I took a call at the home to say the "system" had lost the booking and the engineer wouldn't be coming.
I said I was in all day, he could come now but that was clearly off script and the call centre operative wouldn't enterntain the idea (annoyingly there were 2 BT vans in my neighbourhood that afternoon). Instead they wanted me to rebook another 4 hour appointment. I couldn't stop in Saturday and wasn't going to lose more leave. I said I would discuss the options with my husband.
What followed that afternoon was a series of coversations with them, some with me at home and some with my husband at work offering the same options and us giving the same response. I don't know if the operatives weren't talking to each other or didn't understand but it was really irritating. In the end they said they would call my husband at 4pm. They called some time after 5 and said the would try the exchange first and call us Monday morning if they needed to access the property.
Saturday 8.30 the engineer called to say they were on their way, we had the time so we waited. He arrived and was in the house all of 15 minutes before confirming the problem was in the exchange (all that time wasted for that!). We got a call Sunday to say they needed a new part at the exchange then today my husband got an undecipherable voicemail and a text saying the service will be fixed in the next 72 hours. He has spoken to them this evening and we're still non-the-wiser as now there's a fault further up the line.
Whilst all this is going on we have tried to find out if they expect us to pay for the Infinity and BT Vision whilst the services are not working. All they will say is they won't look at refunding losses until the issue is fixed. I realise they can't give us a total but it was a pretty straight forward question - am I paying for this non-service. One operator has said I can have £10 to cover the missed appointment (I value my time and annual leave a little higher).
In all honestly the loss of internet and BT vision is frustrating but what has really dissapointed me is the lack of customer service. No one in the call centres seem to have a clue what's going on (we've had so many versions of what's wrong) and are too tied to a script. There's no sense of inconvenience - I'm supposed to be ready and waiting for 4 hours at a time but they will fix it sometime in the next 3 day.
Right now I'm not even sure its worth waiting to get this fixed.
I'd love for someone to come on here and fix this for me but I'd settle for a little peer support/shared experience.
Thanks
L

OK, so I was being a little optimisitic. We're back online (yay!) but now the bill is just more of the same. Apparently we have to wait 48 hours before they will tell us how they are adjusting the bill I understand that they cannot confirm the problem si fixed yet because of some internal policy but they won't even tell us how much they would calculate as of now - a pretty straight forward question.
So with that, we threw in the towel... said if they can't asnwer a simple question we were off. Of course when I told then operator this he said he's put me straight through to his boss and then left me on hold for over 20 minutes before I gave up!
Called back to leaver dept. to be told we have to pay £200 to cancel (funny they could give us that figure pretty easily). I don't know what was said when he signed up but I am going to be investigating this further. We've had the service less than a month and its been broken a week.

SSRS 2008 R2 is extremely slow. The query runs in less than a second in the dataset designer but if you try to view the report it takes over 10 minutes. I have read this is a bug in SSRS 2008 R2. We installed the most recent patches and service packs.

SSRS 2008 R2 is extremely slow. The query runs in less than a second in the dataset designer but if you try to view the report it takes over 10 minutes. I have read this is a bug in SSRS 2008 R2. We installed the most recent patches and
service packs. Nothing we've done so far has fixed it and I see that I'm not the only person with this problem. However I don't see any answers either.

Hi Kim Sharp,
According to your description that when you view the report it is extremely slow in SSRS 2008 R2 but it is very fast when execute the query in dataset designer, right?
I have tested on my local environment and can‘t reproduce the issue. Obviously, it is the performance issue, rendering performance can be affected by a combination of factors that include hardware, number of concurrent users accessing reports, the amount
of data in a report, design of the report, and output format. If you have parameters in your report which contains many values in the list, the bad performance as you mentioned is an known issue on 2008 R2 and already have the hotfix:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2276203
Any issue after applying the update, I recommend you that submit a feedback at https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/
If you don’t have, you can do some action to improve the performance when designing the report. Because how you create and update reports affects how fast the report renders.
Actually, the Report Server ExecutionLog2 view contains reports performance data. You could make use of below query to see where the report processing time is being spent:
After you determine whether the delay time is in data retrieval, report processing, or report rendering:
use ReportServer
SELECT TOP 10 ReportPath,parameters,
TimeDataRetrieval + TimeProcessing + TimeRendering as [total time],
TimeDataRetrieval, TimeProcessing, TimeRendering,
ByteCount, [RowCount],Source, AdditionalInfo
FROM ExecutionLog2
ORDER BY Timestart DESC
Use below methods to help troubleshoot issues according to the above query result :
Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance
Besides this, you could also follow these articles for more information about this issue:
Report Server Catalog Best Practices
Performance, Snapshots, Caching (Reporting Services)
Similar thread for your reference:
SSRS slow
Any problem, please feel free to ask
Regards
Vicky Liu

Best kilometer rate is LESS than average

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for