Best Practice for mail connectors

I am setting up connectors for exchange and groupwise and am testing auto-provisioning. I am running into an issue with groupwise where the GroupWise connector attempts to provision before the E-Directory account is established. Is there a best practice for how to avoid this from happening? should I add a hidden OIM field that populates when E-dir is provisioned correctly and put a rule in place to catch it and then provision groupwise or is there an easier way?
rkimbal45

You can put a task on the create user of the email that validates the directory exists. And you can set the retry counter, so that if your email connectors runs first, it will not continue. Then when retry happens, it will see it exists, and then your next tasks can trigger. Just create it as an unconditional task and set it as a preceding to your Create User task. This will keep the create user task in a pending state until your check completes.
-Kevin

Similar Messages

Best practice for keeping a mail session open in web application?

Hello,
We have a webmail like application where users login with their IMAP credentials, then are taken to an authenticated area of the site where they can manage different things about their email account.
Right now the application is opening and closing a mail store connection (via a new javax.mail.Session) for each page load based on the current logged in user credentials. To me this seems like it would be a bad practice to keep opening and closing a connection each page load.
Are there any best practices for this situation? It would be nice to be able to open the connection to the mail server on login, then keep that connection open until the person logs out, session expires, etc.
I can probably put the javax.mail.Session into the HTTP session, but that seems like it would break any clustering functionality of tomcat. This would be fine if the machine the user is on didn't fail, but id assume if they failed over to another the mail session would be gone. Maybe keeping the mail session in the http session, checking for a connection, then first attempting to reconnect with the logged in credentials before giving up would be a possiblity?
Any pointers would be appreciated

If you keep the connection open across pages, you're going to need to deal with
timeouts - from the http session and from the mail server.
If you don't keep the connection open, you're going to need to "resynchronize"
your view of the store/folder with each operation, in case the folder is modified
by another session.
The former is easier in the common cases, especially if you don't care how gracefully
you handle failures. The latter is more difficult in the common cases, but handles
failure better, and in particular handles clustering better. You'll need to measure it to
see if it meets your performance and scalability requirements. You may need to mix
the two approaches to get acceptable performance.

Best practices for speeding up Mail with large numbers of mail?

I have over 100,000 mails going back about 7 years in multiple accounts in dozens of folders using up nearly 3GB of disk space.
Things are starting to drag - particularly when it comes to opening folders.
I suspect the main problem is having large numbers of mails in those folders that are the slowest - like maybe a few thousand at a time or more.
What are some best practices for dealing with very large amounts of mails?
Are smart mailboxes faster to deal with? I would think they would be slower because the original emails would tend to not get filed as often, leading to even larger mailboxes. And the search time takes a lot, doesn't it?
Are there utilities for auto-filing messages in large mailboxes to, say, divide them up by month to make the mailboxes smaller? Would that speed things up?
Or what about moving older messages out of mail to a database where they are still searchable but not weighing down on Mail itself?
Suggestions are welcome!
Thanks!
doug

Smart mailboxes obviously cannot be any faster than real mailboxes, and storing large amounts of mail in a single mailbox is calling for trouble. Rather than organizing mail in mailboxes by month, however, what I like to do is organize it by year, with subfolders by topic for each year. You may also want to take a look at the following article:
http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/08/21/can-mailapp-cope-with-heavy-loads/
That said, it could be that you need to re-create the index, which you can do as follows:
1. Quit Mail if it’s running.
2. In the Finder, go to ~/Library/Mail/. Make a backup copy of this folder, just in case something goes wrong, e.g. by dragging it to the Desktop while holding the Option (Alt) key down. This is where all your mail is stored.
3. Locate Envelope Index and move it to the Trash. If you see an Envelope Index-journal file there, delete it as well.
4. Move any “IMAP-”, “Mac-”, or “Exchange-” account folders to the Trash. Note that you can do this with IMAP-type accounts because they store mail on the server and Mail can easily re-create them. DON’T trash any “POP-” account folders, as that would cause all mail stored there to be lost.
5. Open Mail. It will tell you that your mail needs to be “imported”. Click Continue and Mail will proceed to re-create Envelope Index -- Mail says it’s “importing”, but it just re-creates the index if the mailboxes are already in Mail 2.x format.
6. As a side effect of having removed the IMAP account folders, those accounts may be in an “offline” state now. Do Mailbox > Go Online to bring them back online.
Note: For those not familiarized with the ~/ notation, it refers to the user’s home folder, i.e. ~/Library is the Library folder within the user’s home folder.

Workflow not completed, is this best practice for PR?

Hi SAP Workflow experts,
I am new in workflow and now responsible to support existing PR release workflow.
The workflow is quite simple and straightforward but the issue here is the workflow seems like will never be completed.
If the user released the PR, the next activity is Requisition released that using task TS20000162.
This will send work item to user (pr creator) sap inbox which when they double click it will complete the workflow.
The thing here is, in our organization, user does not access SAP inbox hence there are thousands of work item that has not been completed. (our procurement system started since 2009).
Our PR creator will receive notification of the PR approval to theirs outlook mail handled by a program that is scheduled every 5 minutes.
Since the documentation is not clear enough, i can't digest why the implementer used this approach.
May I know whether this is the best practice for PR workflow or not?
Now my idea is to modify the send email program to complete the workitem after the email being sent to user outlook mail.
Not sure whether it is common or not though in workflow world.
Any help is deeply appreciated.
Thank you.

Hello,
"This will send work item to user (pr creator) sap inbox which when they double click it will complete the workflow."
It sounds liek they are sending a workitem where an email would be enough. By completing the workitem they are simply acknowledging that they have received notification of the completion of the PR.
"Our PR creator will receive notification of the PR approval to theirs outlook mail handled by a program that is scheduled every 5 minutes."
I hope (and assume) that they only receive the email once.
I would change the workflow to send an email (SendMail step) to the initiator instead of the workitem. That is normally what happens. Either that or there is no email at all - some businesses only send an email if something goes wrong. Of course, the business has to agree to this change.
Having that final workitem adds nothing to the process. Replace it with an email.
regards
Rick Bakker
hanabi technology

Best practice for reinstalling anti virus on reinstalling windows

Best practice for reinstalling anti virus after formatting drive and reinstalling windows No anti virus disc.
Hasty

Hello,
I'd ask in the Windows forum on Microsoft Community.
Karl
When you see answers and helpful posts, please click Vote As Helpful, Propose As Answer, and/or Mark As Answer.
My Blog:http://unlockpowershell.wordpress.com
My Book:Windows PowerShell 2.0 Bible
My E-mail: -join ('6F6C646B61726C40686F746D61696C2E636F6D'-split'(?<=\G.{2})'|%{if($_){[char][int]"0x$_"}})

Best practice for RDGW placement in RDS 2012 R2 deployment

Hi,
I have been setting up a RDS 2012 R2 farm deployment and the time has come for setting up the RDGW servers. I have a farm with 4 SH servers, 2 WA servers, 2 CB servers and 1 LS.
Farm works great for LAN and VPN users.
Now i want to add two domain joined RDGW servers.
The question is; I've read a lot on technet and different sites about how to set the thing up, but no one mentions any best practices for where to place them.
Should i:
- set up WAP in my DMZ with ADFS in LAN, then place the RDGW in the LAN and reverse proxy in
- place RDGW in the DMZ, opening all those required ports into the LAN
- place the RDGW in the LAN, then port forward port 443 into it from internet
Any help is greatly appreciated.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights

Hi,
The deployment is totally depends on your & company requirements as many things to taken care such as Hardware, Network, Security and other related stuff. Personally to setup RD Gateway server I would not prefer you to select 1st option. But as per my research,
for best result you can use option 2 (To place RDG server in DMZ and then allowed the required ports). Because by doing so outside network can’t directly connect to your internal server and it’s difficult to break the network by any attackers. A perimeter
network (DMZ) is a small network that is set up separately from an organization's private network and the Internet. In a network, the hosts most vulnerable to attack are those that provide services to users outside of the LAN, such as e-mail, web, RD Gateway,
RD Web Access and DNS servers. Because of the increased potential of these hosts being compromised, they are placed into their own sub-network called a perimeter network in order to protect the rest of the network if an intruder were to succeed. You can refer
beneath article for more information.
RD Gateway deployment in a perimeter network & Firewall rules
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rds/archive/2009/07/31/rd-gateway-deployment-in-a-perimeter-network-firewall-rules.aspx
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

HTML and CSS Best Practices for Eloqua?

Hello Topliners Community,
My name is Ben and I am a Web Designer. I am currently looking for any guidance on HTML and CSS best practices when working with Eloqua. I am interested in the best practices for e-mail and landing pages.
Thank you,
Ben

Personally I like to upload my custom created html/css into Eloqua instead of using the WYSIWYG.
But if you must then right clicking on text boxes and click edit source is the way to go.
There was a good discussion on editing your forms with CSS:
Energize Your Eloqua10 Forms with CSS
created by Ryan Wheler on Nov 2, 2012 8:44 AM, last modified by Greg Stotler on Sep 19, 2013 2:00 PM
Version 2
CSS can be used to heavily customize the layout of forms in Eloqua10. In this article we will provide sample cover some common formatting use cases on Eloqua10 Landing Pages. Further details about uses of CSS in Eloqua10 form templates can be found here: EE12 - Do It - Eloqua - Energize E10 Forms
Eloqua10 Forms HTML Structure
Below is an outline of the structure of the HTML generated by Eloqua when a form is added to a landing page. By targeting the HTML classes highlighted below, we can control the layout of any form on your landing page.
For the rest of page: http://topliners.eloqua.com/docs/DOC-3015

IronPort ESA best practice for DNS servers?

Hello!
Is there a best practice for what servers should be used for the Cisco IronPort DNS servers?
Currently when I check our configuration, we have set it to "Use these DNS servers" and the first two are our domain controllers and last two are Google DNS.
Is there a best practice way of doing this? I'm thinking of selecting the "Use the Internet's Root DNS Servers" option as I can't really see an advantage of using internal DC's.
Thoughts?

Best practice is to use Internet Root DNS Servers and define specific dns servers for any domain that you need to give different answers for. Since internal mail delivery is controlled by smtproutes using internal dns servers is normally not required.
If you must use internal dns servers I recommend servers dedicated to your Ironports and not just using servers that handle enterprise lookups as well. Ironports can place a very high load on dns servers because every outside connection results in multiple dns lookups. (forward, reverse, sbrs)
If you don't have enough dns horsepower you are susceptible to a DOS attack either through accident or design. If the Ironports overload your internal dns servers it can impact your entire enterprise.

Validation Best Practice for an javafx project

Hello,
I am investigating how to validate a JavaFX project and specifically where to display the validation results with appropriate icons and text. Do you have any thoughts on best practice for this? Are there any features in JavaFX to do this? Are there any third-party library that does this?
Thanks

See:
Re: Forms and validations - here's some of my ideas, what are yours? "Thread: Forms and validations - here's some of my ideas, what are yours?"
And messages in this mailing list thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2012-February/000717.html "Validate Me"

Best practice for promoting roles

I would like to know what is the best practices for promoting Administrative and/or normal Roles between environments. If I make a change to the capabilities of a role, I'd rather not create a whole new build if I didn't have to. Would exporting from debug, and importing via 'lh import' suffice, or is there an easier/better method?
Thanks

Hello,
I'd ask in the Windows forum on Microsoft Community.
Karl
When you see answers and helpful posts, please click Vote As Helpful, Propose As Answer, and/or Mark As Answer.
My Blog:http://unlockpowershell.wordpress.com
My Book:Windows PowerShell 2.0 Bible
My E-mail: -join ('6F6C646B61726C40686F746D61696C2E636F6D'-split'(?<=\G.{2})'|%{if($_){[char][int]"0x$_"}})

Best practices for initial data loads to MDM

Hi,
We need to load more than 300000 vendors from SAP into MDM production repository. Import server might take days to load that much if no error occurs.
Are there any best practices for initial loads to MDM available? What considerations must be made while doing the initial loads.
Harsha

Hello Harsh
With SP05 patch1 there is a file aggregation functionality in the import port. Is is supposed to optimize the import performance.
BTW, give me your mail address and I will send you an idoc packaging paper for MDM.
Regards,
Goekhan

DNS best practices for hub and spoke AD Architecture?

I have an Active Directory Forest with a forest root such as joe.co and the root domain of the same name, and root DNS servers (Domain Controllers) dns1.joe.co and dns2.joe.co
I have child domains with names in the form region1.joe.com, region2.joe.co and so on, with dns servers dns1.region1.joe.co and so on.
Each region has distribute offices that may have a DC in them, servers named in the form dns1branch1.region1.joe.co
Over all my DNS tests out okay, but I want to get the general guidelines for setting up new DCs correct.
Configuration:
Root DC/DNS server dns1.joe.co adapter settings points DNS to itself, then two other root domain DNS/DCs dns2.joe.co and dns3.joe.co.
The other root domain DNS/DCs adapter settings point to root server dns1.joe.co and then to itself dns2.joe.co, and then 127.0.0.1
The regional domains have a root dns server dns1.region1.joe.co with adapter that that points to root server dns1.joe.co then to itself.
The additional region domain DNS/DCs adapter settings point to dns1.region1.joe.co then to itself then to dn1.joe.co
What would you do to correct this topology (and settings) or improve it?
Thanks in advance
just david

Hi,
According to your description, my understanding is that you need suggestion about your DNS topology.
In theory, there is no obvious problem. Except for the namespace and server plaining for DNS, zone is also needed to consideration. If you place DNS server on each domain and subdomain, confirm that if the traffic browsed by DNS will affect the network performance.
Besides, fault tolerance and security are also necessary.
We usually recommend that:
DC with DNS should point to another DNS server as primary and itself as secondary or tertiary. It should not point to self as primary due to various DNS islanding and performance issues that can occur. And when referencing a DNS server on itself, a DNS client
should always use a loopback address and not a real IP address. detailed information you may reference:
What is Microsoft's best practice for where and how many DNS servers exist? What about for configuring DNS client settings on DC’s and members?
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2010/07/17/friday-mail-sack-saturday-edition.aspx#dnsbest
How To Split and Migrate Child Domain DNS Records To a Dedicated DNS Zone
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askpfeplat/archive/2013/12/02/how-to-split-and-migrate-child-domain-dns-records-to-a-dedicated-dns-zone.aspx
Best Regards,
Eve Wang
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Best Practices for Content Management

Hi All,
Could anybody suggest me what are the best practices for Content Management.
Regards,
Tom

Hi Rajan,
Even I want the same. I shall be very thankfull to you if you can send me also.
My mail ID is [email protected]
Best Regards,
Chamkaur
Message was edited by:
Chamkaur Brar

Is there a list of best practices for Azure Cloud Services?

Hi all;
I was talking with a Sql Server expert today and learned that Azure Sql Server can take up to a minute to respond to a query that normally takes a fraction of a second. This is one of those things where it's really valuable to learn it when architecting as
opposed to when we go live.
Cloud Services are not Sql Server (obviously) but that led to the question - Is there a list of best practices for Azure Cloud Services? If so, what are they?
We will be placing the cloud services in multiple datacenters and using traffic manager to point people to the right one. The cloud service will set between an IMAP client & server, pretending to be the mail client to the server, and the server to the client.
Mostly it will pass all requests & responses across from one to the other.
thanks - dave
What we did for the last 6 months -
Made the world's coolest reporting & docgen system even more amazing

hi dave,
>>Cloud Services are not Sql Server (obviously) but that led to the question - Is there a list of best practices for Azure Cloud Services? If so, what are they?
For this issue, I have collected some blogs and document about best practices for azure cloud service, you can view them, but I am not sure they are your need.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/xx130451.aspx
http://gauravmantri.com/2013/01/11/some-best-practices-for-building-windows-azure-cloud-applications/
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/CloudPowerHowToScaleAzureWebsitesGloballyWithTrafficManager.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/jj717232.aspxhttp://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/best-practices-performance/
>>The cloud service will set between an IMAP client & server, pretending to be the mail client to the server, and the server to the client. Mostly it will pass all requests & responses across from one to the other.
For your scenarioes, If you'd like to communicate with each instances, I recommend you refer to this document (
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/hh180158.aspx ). And generally, if we want connect the client to server on Azure, the service bus is a good choice (http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/cloud-services-dotnet-multi-tier-app-using-service-bus-queues/
If I misunderstood, please let me know.
Regards,
Will
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Tips and best practices for translating C into LabVIEW? SERIOUS newbie...

I need to translate a C function into LabVIEW. This will be my *first* LabVIEW project. I've been reading some tutorials, and I'm still struggling to get my brain out of "C/C++ mode" and learn the LabVIEW paradigms.
Structurally, the function that I need to translate gets called from a while-loop and performs a bunch of mathematical calculations.
The basic layout is something like this (this obviously isn't the actual code, it just illustrates the general flow control and techniques that it uses).
struct Params
// About 20 int and float parameters
int CalculateMetrics(Params *pParams,
float input1, float input2 [etc])
int errorCode = 0;
float metric1;
float metric2;
float metric3;
// Do some math like:
metric1 = input1 * (pParams->someParam - 5);
metric2 = metric1 + (input2 / pParams->someOtherParam);
// Tons more simple math
// A couple for-loops
if (metric1 < metric2)
// manipulate metric1 somehow
else
// set some kind of error code
errorCode = ...;
if (!errorCode)
metric3 = metric1 + pow(metric2, 3);
// More math...
// etc...
// update some external global metrics variables
return errorCode;
I'm still too green to understand whether or not a function like this can translate cleanly from C to LabVIEW, or whether the LabVIEW version will have significant structural differences.
Are there any general tips or "best practices" for this kind of task?
Here are some more specific questions:
Most of the LabVIEW examples that I've seen (at least at the beginner level) seem to heavily rely on using the front panel controls to provide inputs to functions. How do I build a VI where the input arguments(input1, input2, etc) come as numbers, and aren't tied to dials or buttons on the front panel?
The structure of the C function seems to rely heavily on the use of stack variables like metric1 and metric2 in order to perform calculations. It seems like creating temporary "stack" variables in LabVIEW is possible, but frowned upon. Is it possible to keep this general structure in the LabVIEW VI without making the code a mess?
Thanks guys!

There's already a couple of good answers, but to add to #1:
You're clearly looking for a typical C-function. Any VI that doesn't require front panel opening (user interaction) can be such a function.
If the front panel is never opened the controls are merely used to send data to the VI, much like (identical to) the declaration of a C-function. The indicators can/will be return values.
Which controls and indicators are used to sending data in and out of a VI is almost too easy; Click the icon of the front panel (top right) and show connector, click which control/indicator goes where. Done. That's your functions declaration.
Basically one function is one VI, although you might want to split it even further, dont create 3k*3k pixel diagrams.
Depending on the amount of calculations done in your If-Thens they might be sub vi's of their own.
/Y
LabVIEW 8.2 - 2014
"Only dead fish swim downstream" - "My life for Kudos!" - "Dumb people repeat old mistakes - smart ones create new ones."
G# - Free award winning reference based OOP for LV

Best Practice for mail connectors

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for