Best way to to partition a 500GB Seagate Freeagent

What is the best way to to partition a 500GB Seagate Freeagent external HD. I need to have it set up into three different drives for use with timemachine. Not sure if all the section should be journaling enabled. I do need 1 partition for a windows machine.

This is what I did.
PARTITIONING EXTERNAL DRIVE FOR MAC AND PC USE
You need to have a partition for OS X and one for your PC. Partitioning will erase your drive.
1. Open *Disk Utility* in the utilities folder in finder. Pick your external drive and choose Partition under volume scheme choose number of partitions needed. Pick the size of the partitions by either dragging the center bar with the dot on it or type in the size.
Note: if you don’t need 2 Mac partitions leave out step 3.
2. Pick the partition you want to be your mac partition then choose Options and pick guid partition table. For format choose mac os extended journaled. Pick a name for this partition.
3. Pick the partition you want to be your 2nd mac partition and under Options choose *Apple Partition Map*. For format choose mac os extended journaled. Pick a name for this partition.
4. Now pick the other partition and under Options choose master boot record. Under format choose MS-DOS file system. Choose a name for this partition.
5. If you need more partitions you can either repeat number 2 or number 3.
6. Now in the right hand corner choose Partition. It will take a while so be patient.

Similar Messages

Best way to change partition key on existing table

Hi,
Using Oracle 11.20.3 on AIX.
We have a table about 800 million rows and 120gb in size.
Want to try copies oif this table to evalaute different partitiong strategies.
What is the quickest way to do this?
Would have liked say datapump table 1 tro disk and datapumo import the data to new table but do the tables need to be of the same format.
Thanks

>
Using Oracle 11.20.3 on AIX.
We have a table about 800 million rows and 120gb in size.
Want to try copies oif this table to evalaute different partitiong strategies.
What is the quickest way to do this?
Would have liked say datapump table 1 tro disk and datapumo import the data to new table but do the tables need to be of the same format.
>
First your subject asks a different question that the text you posted: Best way to change partition key on existing table. The answer to that question is YOU CAN'T. All data has to be moved to change the partition key since each partition/subpartition is in its own segment. You either create a new table or use DBMS_REDEFINITION to redefine the table online.
Why do you want to export all data to a file first? That just adds to the time and cost of doing the op.
What problem are you trying to use partitioning to solve? Performance? Data maintenance? For performance the appropriate partitioning key and whether to use subpartitions depends on the types of queries and the query predicates you typically use as well as the columns that may be suitable for partition keys.
For maintenance a common method is to partition on a date by year/month/day so you can more easily load new daily/weekly/monthly data into its own partition or drop old data that no longer needs to be kept online.
You should use a small subset of the data when testing your partitionings strategies.
Can you do the partitioning offline in an outage window? If not then using the DBMS_REDEFINITION is your only option.
Without knowing what you are trying to accomplish only general advice can be given. You even mentioned that you might want to use a different set of columns than the curren table has.
A standard heap table uses ONE segment for its data (ignoring possible LOB segments). A partitioned/subpartitioned table uses ONE segment for each partition/subpartition. This means that ALL data must be moved to partition the table (unless you are only creating one partition).
This means that every partitioning scheme that uses a different partition key requires ALL data to be moved again for that test.
Provide some information about what problem you are trying to solve.
>
Is this quicker than datapump?
>
Yes - exporting the data simplying moves it all an additional time. Ok to export if you need a backup before you start.
>
Found artcle which talks about using merge option on datapump import to convert partitioned table to non-partitioned table.
>
How would that apply to you? That isn't what you said you wanted to do.

Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 500GB Disconnects Unexpectedly during Time Machine backups

I have a 20" 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo (Early 2008) iMac with 4GB Ram. A few days ago I finally took the time to upgrade from Snow Leopard to Mavericks. I have 3 Seagate external drives connected to the iMac (2 connected directly and one through a powered hub - all via USB). I use one of the external drives, a 500GB Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex named TARDIS for my Time Machine backups. This has been running fine for quite a while. After the upgrade to Mavericks I started seeing it disconnect unexpectedly. There were no power fluctuations, the cord was not bumped, and this had never happened prior to the upgrade.
I searched these boards and found several people having issues with drives disconnecting after upgrading and followed suggestions regarding resetting the pram which I did to no effect, a suggestion to delete the com.apple.TimeMachine.plist preferences file which I did, also to no effect. Finally, knowing that I didn't have anything irreplaceable on the existing Time Machine backups, I re-formatted the drive - this also had no effect. Through this process I discovereed that the disconnects were always happening while Time Machine was trying to run a backup. It would get to about 20 megabytes backed up and then just sit there until it gave me the drive was improperly disconnected message.
I was getting really frustrated at this point. I read something somewhere about issues with the main drive causing errors with Time Machine (not sure the details at this point) and so I did a Verify Disk on my internal system drive. It did find some issues so I followed the instructions to repair them which worked fine. I also ran the verify on the Time Machine drive which did not discover any issues.
I reformatted the drive again, giving it a different name (Backup). I set up Time Machine again to backup to the newly named drive. It was backing up properly. I thought I had finally gotten it into a working state. I thought maybe there was a trace of the old drive name somewhere that was causing the issue. The backup finished successfully. All was good. Until the next time Time Machine started to run when it again stalled before disconnecting.
I reformatted the drive one more time, giving it yet another new name (Delorean) and have not set up Time Machine. If I don't run Time Machine, the drive does not suffer issues with disconnecting. I have tried copying a large file to the drive to see if some I/O would trigger a disconnect and I had no problems. I plan to run a few more tests like this but so far it has been connected for more than 24 hours and has not disconnected itself. This to me suggests it is something to do with Time Machine running under Mavericks. I don't have another Mac that I can try running Time Machine on to verify that this is an issue caused by Mavericks but that seems to be the case.
Any ideas?

its a dying SATA bridge card, extremely common issue.
read all about it here:
Your dead external hard drive is likely fine! Great hope for your 'faulty' external HD
I really wish people would learn about the A #1 issue that affects external HD, its a 50 cent part that makes it seem their ext. HD has failed / failing.
Thousands of people every day experience what at first seems that their external USB or Thunderbolt HD, either 2.5" portable or 3.5" desktop model is dying, is dead, or all hope is lost for it. Good news is that you have roughly a greater than 50-60% chance that your external hard drive is perfectly fine!
The great news at the end of the tunnel of an apparently failed or failing external hard drive.
When checked on another computer, and with no need for spending money on data extraction expertise or software, the very likely case is that your external USB or thunderbolt HD is in fact fine, and merely the card interface, or SATA bridge card has failed or is failing. Keeping a HD dock around handy, or cheaper still a $20 hard drive enclosure or a SATA to USB connector can be a real life saver in getting your drive back to use, when the drive itself is fine, and merely its interface card has gone bad.
The SATA bridge card inside a USB external HD has a very high failure rate in general
Typical SATA bridge cards as seen inside a 3.5" external HD with power input (#1), and 2.5" SATA cards (#3, #4, #5)
What are the realistic odds your HD is perfectly fine?
There are no hard facts whatsoever, especially since so many people discard their assumed “dead/faulty” hard drives, but a good educated conclusion from years of examining and seeing this issue is that for hard drives made since 2010, and not dropped or generally abused, is that a minimum of 50% conservatively are perfectly fine! I personally estimate however that it likely approaches 60%+.
Considering how many external hard drives ‘fail’ (rather the SATA bridge more than half the time) each day, that is a very high number of perfectly fine HD that are tossed!
This is especially common with 3.5” desktop HD that are connected 24/7 with power and see a lot of data transfer. People wrongly conclude that “X” mfg. just made a defective drive, when in fact their 3.5” drives inside the plastic enclosure is 100% fine. I have personally seen well over 200 of these dead SATA cards and additionally seen 3 fail within a one hour span of doing a large data copies.
One of the very reason pros use bare HD as inserted into HD docks is not just the saving of space and the need for endless USB cables, but the elimination of the need for this high failure-rate part.
While the shapes and sizes vary somewhat on SATA bridge cards, they all serve the same purpose and have likewise failure rates
What exactly is the SATA bridge card in your external HD?
In the middle to late of 2009, most all external hard drives both in 2.5” and 3.5” reached the shelves in SATA III. These small SATA cards or "bridges" are used to translate between the hard drives’ interfaces and the enclosures' external ports (USB, Thunderbolt, Firewire). Additionally these small bridges not only transfer power but also of course the data. Unfortunately these SATA bridge cards have a very high failure rate as they are burdened with moving power (in 2.5" HD) and of course data.
Literally, these little unreliable and fragile cards are the power conduits and of course the nervous system for all external HD data transfer.
SATA card as found inside a typical USB external hard drive
The assumption that the hard drive is bad when its not!
Countless 1000s of good external hard drives are thrown away each year because the owner thought the HD was bad when it fact it was the SATA bridge card which had failed. This card is removed in a matter of mere second once an external USB HD is cracked open from its plastic casing to reveal the bare HD and the attached SATA card which attaches between the HD and the USB cable.
To complicate this problem, even many computer professionals do not know that there is a very easy solution to the “failing or dead HD” issue since the hard drive itself is very likely just fine. Its astonishing that so many highly educated computer repair persons are unaware of this high-failure part, but this is mostly due to the fact that they do not juggle 100s of hard drives and know that of the iceberg that is a “external hard drive failure”, the mostly unseen majority are not a HD failure at all, but a bridge card failure.
To add to this great misunderstanding is the fact that people assume that "likewise symptoms seen on an external HD are the same as seen on an internal HD, therefore also the external HD must be bad". This is a compositional fallacy of logic. Since internal HD do not have a SATA bridge interface, to conclude similar symptoms "indicate the same failure" is misplaced and incorrect.
This is all not to say that HD do not fail, they do indeed, and I have seen many 100s of dead and failing hard drives. Hard drives even under ideal conditions have a life expectancy of around 4-8 years due to ferromagnetic depolarization from entropy and the main reason being mechanical failure. But of the mountain of symptoms that are seen as “hard drive failures” in comments, posts, and hearsay, half or more of these are not a HD failure at all.
What makes up an external USB HD or Thunderbolt HD?
While modern external HD boxes vary in shape and size somewhat, they're the same inside on almost 100% of them.
Four parts essentially:
1. Your 2.5” or 3.5” hard drive.
2. The plastic or metal box it rests in.
3. The USB cable and also (in the case of the 3.5” external) the power cable and block.
4. The SATA bridge card.
Clear USB HD in its case, with green SATA card at top,...not shown is the USB cable
The USB cables are almost entirely unheard of today to fail, and the box enclosure cannot fail, leaving the good HD you have taken care of and the 50 cent part which juggles both power and data to and from the HD itself, that being the SATA card.
What drives will work for this go-around fix?
Almost any drive 2010 and later, all 3.5” HD mid-2010 and on, and almost all USB 2.5” external hard drives, including firewire, and thunderbolt enclosure encased conventional platter hard drives.
The rare exception is a slimline 7mm thick "slim" external HD in both Toshiba and WD in certain models where the SATA bridge has been incorporated into the HD to save money and production costs.
Much older drives 2009 and earlier will not work for this faulty part work around.

Best way to cofigure/format/partition a new 500GB external HD.

I have a new 500GB Seagate Firewire/USB HD. I want to do this right the first time so I'm asking for advice. I'm sure there are different philosophies on "what's best" and I'ld like to hear some suggestions and different options and why or why not, to do or not to do...advantages and disadvantages on:
Partitions, formats, configurations, RAID, striped RAID, mirrored RAID, concatenated RAID, etc..

The fastest your drive will be able transmit or recieve will be about 40 MBytes a second (or about 320 Mbits/sec) assuming you are running it USB 2.0
Your seagate has a top speed of around 68-72 MB/ sec at the beginning of the drive and slows to half that for the last third.
If this was an internal drive I would recomend partitioning it with a 1:2 ratio (166:333) and put your OS, applications and all your current files on the first partition and using the second for storage. That way all the often accessed files are at the front/outer/faster part of the drive. This ensures that even after multiple updates, defrags, and reinstallations of the OS those files remain on the "zippy" part of the drive.
BUT
Because this is an external drive the USB speed limitation negates MOST of the speed advantage gained by partitioning. If you want to make a seldom used OS-boot partition put it at the end of the drive (slowest part).
Having the option to boot several different OSX versions is in the realm of Apple fetishism, and OS9 is for Luddites. You have OS 10.4.8 now and we can only hope that each new OS has been better than the last. The only time an older OS can be an advantage is sometimes 3rd party hardware becomes "unsupported" by OS updates.
For better data security go journaled.
If you really want to get the most out of your drives take the new seagate out of the external enclosure and install it as your internal drive. Hard drives are the slowest piece of hardware in your computer. (and the slowest to get faster - CPU speed has at least quadrupled in the last 4 years, hard drives have about doubled their speed) The seagate is a smoking fast drive and you would get an immediate and noticable overall performance improvment over your stock 80Gig drive due to faster access/reads/writes and faster virtual memory. Applications will load faster and boot time will be practically cut in half.
Given the choice of two drives you should always use the newer of the two as the opperating drive and the older as the backup. (just like with car tires newer=less chance of needing a backup)
I realize taking apart your snowcone may be daunting but switching your internal drive will really make a big performance difference, and put your newer, more reliable drive where it can do the most good.
Just some thoughts.

Best Way to Load Data in Hash Partition

Hi,
I have partitioning by Hash on a Large Table of 5 TB. We have to load Data say more than 500GB daily on that table from ETL.
What is the best way to Load data into that Big Table which has hash Partition .
Regards
Sahil Soni

Do you have any specific requirements to match records to lookup tables or it just a straight load - that is an insert?
Do you have any specific performance requirements?
The easiest and fastest way to load data into Oracle is via external file and parallel query/parallel insert. Remember that parallel DML is not enabled by default and you have to do so via alter session command. You can leverage multiple CPU cores and direct path operation to perform the load.
Assuming your database is on a linux/unix server - you could NFS load the file if it is on a remote system, but then you will be most likely limited by network transfer speed.

Whats the best way to Change, Increase partition on Win side.

I want to up grade to Windows 8 on my bootcamp partition which is 34GB now, I have 500GB free space on my Mac side. IF I understand what others have written,
I will go into Disck utility and erase the bootcamp and then reinstall bootcamp and increase the partition of boot camp to 200GB. I already back up my mac data and the windows data separately, so I have that if I need it. So Is this the best way to repartition? Or do I also need to erase and start over on my mac side also? I have a iMac 2010, 16GB RAM, 1 TB HD, and been running boot camp since I bought it. I also use Parallels (recently upgraded to 10) to go back and forth between them.
Thanks for any help.

I just successfully installed Windows 8.1 Update 1 on BootCamp on Mac OS X Yosemite. Here is a step by step I just wrote, hope it helps y'all:
How to successfully install Windows 8, or above, on Mac OS X Mavericks or above:
Requirements:
1- Windows OS ISO Image file
2- An 8GBs USB Flash Drive
3- A good Internet connection as you will need to download the Windows compatible drivers for your Mac
Steps:
1- Open up Disk Utility and create an additional partition for Windows formatted as ExFat. 100GBs, or above, is recommended as update to the operating system, as well as Apps requiere space on your HD or SSD [This step can be done during Mac OS X's installation process]
2- Open up BootCamp Assistant
3- Make sure only the 'Create a Windows 7 or later version install disk' is checked and your USB Flash Drive plugged in and click 'Continue'
4- Click 'Choose' and select your Windows ISO Image file
5- Select the USB Flash Drive you will be using during the installation process and click continue to confirm
6- Once done, restart your Mac and hold down the 'alt/option' key on your keyboard to bring up the Boot Menu
7- Select the USB Flash Drive named Windows, not the UEFI Boot
8- Install Windows as you normally would
* Remember to press and hold the 'alt/option' key, and select the Windows Partition, whenever the installation process requires your Mac to restart
* http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/jj945423.aspx
* http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-8/install-windows-on-mac

My Macbook pro was stolen 09/12, the police just returned it to me. I want to remove all the data and start over. Format the drive's etc. I have windows 7 on 1 partion and mountain lion OSX on the apple partition. How is the best way to do this?

My Macbook pro was stolen 09/12, the police just returned it to me. I want to remove all the data and start over. Format the drive's etc. I have windows 7 on 1 partion and mountain lion OSX on the apple partition. How is the best way to do this?

Have a look here...
what-to-do-when-your-hard-drive-is-full.html

Best way to set up partitions on 250GB external drive

Hi all,
I've decided to go with an Iomega eGo 250-GB FireWire portable drive to back up my iBook's hard disk (30 GB) plus to store my photos and maybe hold a bootable copy of OS9.
This is my first time using an external drive, so I don't really know how to go about setting things up.
What would be the best way to set up the partitions on the external drive?
1) I know I should create a 30GB partition for the iBook backup, but what about for the remaining volume? Is it best to leave it as a single large 200GB partition, or split it into two 100GB chunks? Other than the clone of my iBook, I'll mainly be storing photos (at the moment no more than around 10-12GB).
2) I don't yet have a huge iTunes collection, but if I later want to store iTunes music that doesn't fit on my internal drive, is it fine to put it in the same partition as the photos, or would it be preferable to create a separate partition?
3) If I want to install OS9 on the drive, how much space should I allot to it? Would this enable me to run legacy apps on my iBook?
4) Does it matter how I name the partitions (i.e. should the name for my iBook back-up be the same as the original volume or should it be different?)
5) As I still don't know exactly what I need, If today I decide to create only 30GB partition to backup the iBook, can I later partition the remaining space without having to start all over again?
6) Also, the drive came out of the box with Mac OS Extended format. Is this the best format or is there another that would be better?
Thanks for any advice
Message was edited by: Lutetia

1) I know I should create a 30GB partition for the iBook backup, but what about for the remaining volume? Is it best to leave it as a single large 200GB partition, or split it into two 100GB chunks? Other than the clone of my iBook, I'll mainly be storing photos (at the moment no more than around 10-12GB).
2) I don't yet have a huge iTunes collection, but if I later want to store iTunes music that doesn't fit on my internal drive, is it fine to put it in the same partition as the photos, or would it be preferable to create a separate partition?
The answer to both question is that it's completely up to you. Partitioning or not partitioning won't affect operation significantly.
3) If I want to install OS9 on the drive, how much space should I allot to it? Would this enable me to run legacy apps on my iBook?
The iBook G4 can not boot from OS 9 so you would only be able to run OS 9 in the "classic" environment.
4) Does it matter how I name the partitions (i.e. should the name for my iBook back-up be the same as the original volume or should it be different?)
No
5) As I still don't know exactly what I need, If today I decide to create only 30GB partition to backup the iBook, can I later partition the remaining space without having to start all over again?
There are a few tools which promise the ability to change the partitioning without destroying the data on the drive. But you should never do this without making a backup of the data on the drive. Data loss can easily happen and in a big way.
6) Also, the drive came out of the box with Mac OS Extended format. Is this the best format or is there another that would be better?
That is the best format.

Best way to migrate existing XP SP3 partition to a virtual machine to run via Windows 8.1 as physical partition and not a vhd?

Hi I have a current XP SP3 setup have been using in a dual boot with Windows 8.1(on separate partitions on different hard drives - I think these are SATA drives) but now am thinking of migrating my XP partition preferably as a live virtual machine
to be run as a guest via Windows 8.1 as host so I don't have to do the rebooting. Also prefer this to making a VHD of my XP so can use the existing partition allocated for it rather than taking up extra space as VHD on my windows 8 (and don't want yet
to replace my xp dual boot in case it does not work so well as vhd, as I have a lot of old educational programs my kids still use on it that I don't really want to put onto my W8.1). Will also save time if I don't have to convert it to VHD first. I
also do not want to reinstall a new XP Sp3 virtual machine from scratch for same reason - will take too long to resetup -just use existing as is.
I have used VMWare player and Virtual Box in past with an old 98SE system as a virtual VHD/VPC file but VMWare workstation is paid which may be the one I need to use a physical partition but I prefer to try freeware options first.
Will Hyper-V in Windows 8.1 (I have retail PRO version of both my XP and Windows 8.1) be able to do the same as VMWare workstation? OR is there another option to run the physical XP?
The other thing with my XP setup is that the user profiles that people login with are located on a different partition E (80GB) to my XP which is on J (100GB) and most of the programs for it run from partition D (over 120GB) and the XP boot loader resides
on a partition C (2GB) (which is not the Windows8.1 partition which becomes C only when it boots, but this C drive for XP may also be having the Windows 8 boot loader and files for that -using EasyBCD to handle boot menu of W7 type boot loader).
So I need a system that can mount these other physical partitions also alongside with my XP partition when it boots up.
So what are my options for running this XP SP3 setup via Windows 8 as a guest operating system?
Also will doing this be likely to require reactivation of my existing windows XP (retail) which means I cannot then use it again if I go back to the XP dual boot at times or in case the VM setup does not work?
Also do I need to change my XP first so that it boots off its own drive rather than the C partition - and how do I set this up then using EasyBCD or windows boot repair?

HI I found I had to make physical disk offline to use in Hyper-V which I cannot do and do not want to do with all partitions - cannot choose just ones want.
So now am trying to make VM of my physical XP -and other partitions neeeded but D partition is over 127Gb so cannot use Disk2VHD.
Here is what am trying now - any other suggestions for alternate software to vmware convertor/disk2VHD maybe to do partitions over 127GB? I have posted also at VMware forums but no answer as yet.
Advice on doing a physical XPSP3 conversion to a VM for Virtual box and hyper-v ultimately
Hi I need advice as to best way to convert an existing XP Sp3 install on a physical hard drive along with other related partitions to a Virtual box VM image with aim to convert that VM image to a Hyper-V VM for use with Windows 8.1 host.
I have several C (boot ini partition), D programs, E Data, etc partitions and a current dual boot with an extra XP install I use as a backup system.
My main XP is on J drive and other XP on I drive with C drive boot ini that switches btw 2 with J set as default.
I have a D partition that is over 127 Gb so cannot use Disk2VHD which would have been easier, and it seems there is not a way to make a direct Hyper-V VM from converter but only Vmware VM?
I do not have or want to purchase as yet VMware Workstation as have W8.1 Pro that can use Hyper-V to run my XP SP3.
I seem to also have an issue with COM+ corrupted on my machine XP J drive ( It tried to reinstall the COM+ but my es.dll file won't register and I did get a failed conversion with converter when tried earlier at 94% saying VSS snapshots have
reached their limit). I think this is related to my COM+ issue which I am not sure now how to fix apart from repair install of my Xp (as I have tried repairing COM with various articles searched on google to no avail) which I may do first before
retry conversion. However my ALT XP on I drive seems to be fine with being able to browse the COM+ applications ok. SO maybe I can use that instead but it is the J drive XP I want the most (not sure if will work at reboot if I do not
hot clone it?)
I have read also the manual for converter 5.5.1 ver standalone and am not sure of a few things so if someone can guide me it would be very much appreciated.
First of all which version VM should I make image of if I later want to convert it to a Hyper-V VM image (I only have free Virtual Box latest ver, VMware Player and Hyper-V on Windows 8.1 PRo) ie: VMware workstation 10 or Vmware Player 6 or lower
ver or other? OR is there another software I should install for the conversion or later conversion to Hyper-V? I prefer to use Hyper-V over Virtual Box and Vmware Player if possible, but should these others work just as well for my Xp Sp3 existing
system as a VM in Windows 8.1? Please advise which you think is best of these?
Should I leave all configuration options off while converting and even XP licence, workgroup etc or is it most likely that I will have to reactivate my XP (retail ver) once I reboot in the VM although I am putting to run on Windows 8.1 host on exact same
hardware as my current XP in dual boot (replacing my physical copies which I don't intend to use after conversion)? Can I enter licence etc later as well?
I currently have 8 GB ram total -should I leave Xp one at max it suggests of around 3Gb ram?
I have Quad core processor -but should I make Xp Vm one dual core for when it runs on W8.1 host to allow the host some processors so can run at same time or leaving my Xp at quad core will be ok?
Network - I want to use host one as I read it is safer for obsolete XP so do I set that at start or is it better to change this later too -allowing xp to have own internet access (maybe as may need to reactivate also - don't want to call Microsoft
if can avoid it)?
If I just want to convert resulting VM to Hyper-V VM -which software to use after for this that is freeware (Virtual Box or VMware Player or Hyper-V -not sure which can do it) and do I not then install Vmware tools?
SYSPprep should I do anyway regardless of what target VM will be when configuring later, even if on same hardware machine? OR can I just boot Vm and see if boots ok first?
Anything else I should set specifically for this future use of the VM image in hyper-v?
AU

60Gb HD with Win 8.1 to new 500Gb HD - Best way

My main current operating system is Win 7 on a 500Gb Sata HD with all my files/Pictures etc. and has 200Gb spare.
I have also a 60Gb HD which has Win 8.1 fully installed and up-dated. I interchange the HD's to up-date and use to try and customise myself with Win 8.1.
I now want to move/copy the Win 8.1 system from the 60Gb drive to a new 500Gb HD.
I also have a Remote 500Gb Sata HD via USB, which I keep a back up of my Win7 system and files etc. This also has approx. 200Gb spare.
How/Best way to transfer from old to new with Win 8.1.
thanks

Hi,
From my view (done many times) cloning is the quickest way yo move everything from olg HDD to new HDD. There are many free products around such as:
http://www.techsupportalert.com/best-free-drive-cloning-software.htm
Regards.
BH
**Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

What is the best way to partitioning Macbook Air 13" 2012 solid state drive

What is the best way to partitioning Macbook Air 13" 2012 solid state drive.

Tech,
You don't provide enough information onto which anyone could reasonably formulate an answer.
As mentioned, you don't indicate the circumstances that would warrant consideration of multiple partitions. Moreover, you also don't indoicate the size of the SSD in question.
Like Fred said, ordinarily you leave it alone as one. Some people like to keep data and the OS/apps separate, but it is for specific reasons.

Best way to split large partition in multiple small partitions

Looking for some ideas here. We ended up having a large/huge partition, the last one (because of maxvalue), while other partitions have similar number of records. What's the best way to split this large partitions with has about 3 years worth of data into separate partitions based on Month/Year. I tried with SPLIT partition, I not able to figure out a way to specify a value where I can like to split.
Any thoughts, ideas appreciated.
Thanks

I'd be inclined to split off that partition as a stand-alone table. Create new partitions and then reload the data. But that "inclined" would depend on the available maintenance window and the amount of data and the Oracle version number none of which you mention.

Best way to set up my new 500GB firewire external HD?

I want to set it up as an external bootable HD, what is the best way to do this?
Thanks
Dan

So I would go for four partitions. Two partitions for boot-able backups of your HD the same size as HD.
Then split the rest in two, one for Photos/Movies other for tunes. Maybe tunes the smaller of the two.
You also might want a fifth for "Time Machine" ? Being that this is new and I don't have it, I am not sure I would trust it, til its been around for awhile.
Backup often and alternate! Backup before and after major updates. You never know when you might want to go back to a pre-update.
Message was edited by: Dakota

Best way to backup your partition?

What is the best way to back up a partition? /dev/sda1 is windows and sda2 is Archlinux. Say if I wanted to reformat sda2 with an new filesystem, but continue to use the exact same installation of Archlinux that I've tailored everywhere possible (I would have to change fstab of course), what would be the best way to backup all files with compression while keeping ownerships and rights? (note: speed is favoured over high compression here though, but any compression would be nice)
All advices are welcome

Fackamato,
I regularly backup using 'rsync'. It has the advantage of only copying changed/new files, eventually deleting deleted
ones.
You can use a mounted NAS, or an internal partition as target. If the NAS also has 'rsync', you can also use it in client/server mode.
F.e., on a local internal partition:
rsync -av --delete --delete-excluded --exclude="/sys/**" --exclude="/proc/** " --exclude="/backup/" / /backup
/backup being a mounted backup partition
'rsync' is most useful if you regularly backup, but has some interest also in one shot copies: if for some reason
the copy fails, f. e. out of space, when you solve the problem and restart, it will only copy what it needs to.
For your particular case, if you have a spare internal partition with enough space (or make one fiddling with gparted),
you could:
mount /dev/sda3 /backup (sda3 being your new partition)
rsync -av --delete --delete-excluded --exclude="/sys/**" --exclude="/proc/** " --exclude="/backup/" / /backup
Change /etc/fstab on sda3.
Add the necessary lines to menu.lst (I suppose you are using Grub) to boot from sda3.
So you can test that everything works before destroying sda2.
Mektub

Should the admin/user folder and all of its sub folders be moved to the hdd or just parts of it? (eg. picture, movies, documents) What is the best way to go about doing this. Also should a 2t hdd be partitioned.

iMac with 256ssd and 2t hdd. Should the admin/user folder and all of its sub folders be moved to the hdd or just parts of it? (eg. picture, movies, documents) What is the best way to go about doing this. Also should a 2t hdd be partitioned.

Yes, you can move your user directories to the HD and keep your OSX and Applications on the SSD drive.
Whether you partition your HD or not depends on how much data you have and how you propose to use your HD.
Are you planning to use your iMac as a Time Machine backup volume? If so, partition it off.
Do you have huge data files, eg video, music, photos?
How much of your 2tb drive will be "free" once it is loaded with all your data?
A little more information is required before the optimal configuration can be recommended for your use.

Best way to to partition a 500GB Seagate Freeagent

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for