Billling Type RE credits posted to COPA

Hi,
The condition type that has been assigned to the billing type RE is associated with a balance sheet GAL account. We are not expecting to post this to CPA. The condition type not assigned to the CPA value field. Can some one explain the reason for posting this to CPA report.
Thanks,

Can you please provide more clarity to your questions regarding the followings?
1. Why the Condition for Returns is assigned to Balance Sheet Account? It should be a P&L account since this is revenue return.
2. Balance sheet accounts are NOT created with cost element,which is a prerequisite to flow in to COPA.
if you could provide more clarity, i could be able to advice you more precisely.

Similar Messages

Movement type post to COPA or not?

Dear all,
Can any one tell me how to control if a movement type posted to COPA or not?
For example, movement type 201 (GI for cost center) only posted to cost center, movement type 901 (GI scrapping COPA) posting to COPA.
Actually I want to set one movement type for writeoff that posting to Cost Center and COPA.
Is it possible? And how?
Thanks a lot.
Kevin

Hi AP,
Yes, the COPA is active. Actually we already have posting to COPA.
My question is, material document for some movement types can post to COPA, and for other movement types can post to Cost Center.
I would like to know how to config the posting to COPA or Cost Center, and is it possible to post to COPA and Cost Center.
Thanks.

Stock transport order with movement type 643 - post to COPA

Hello SAP gurus,
We use movement type 643 to post good issues for stock transport order (intercompany process). The delivery type is NLCC. We recently implemented account-based COPA. At the time of post goods issue, cost of goods sold should be posted to COPA, but it didn't. Could someone help me figuring out how to push PGI to COPA for stock transport order? Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Cassandra Wong

The reason that PA segment is not populated in the good issue for STO is because the cost element of the COGS account was set to "01" instead of "12". I changed the cost element category and the PA segment is populated correctly.

Do not want to Post to COPA

Can someone please explain the value flow between FI/SD and COPA?
We want to stop certain type of Misc. Debit Memos from posting to COPA. A manual pricing condition is mapped to a COPA value field. The GL account used for posting this kind of Debit memos (the GL account assigned to Account Key in VKOA) is already removed from the cost element group which was assigned to PA transfer structure frm FI.
Does anyone have some idea what other settings we need to be change so the Debit Memo does not do a posting to COPA. Is the posting happening due to the mapping of Manual Pricing condition to the COPA value field? Do we need to remove it to stop the posting to COPA?
We are on ECC 6.0. Does the posting go to COPA at the time of Sales Order creation or Billing document creation?

Hi,
You need to delete mapping of Manual Pricing condition to the COPA value field as that is also one of the main component through which value flows from SD to COPA.
But I am agree that if you don't consider your some of the debit memos to flow to COPA, then you will not be in a position to get clear picture in COPA as per your FI P&L. Actually your FI and COPA P&L (Generally you develop in COPA as per your required structure of P&L) will not be tallied.
Pls consider the same before removing the same assignement from PA transfer structure and assignment from COPA value field to SD condition type.
Thanks & Regards,
Taral Patel

URGENT! Idoc Message Type FIDCC2 Not Posting CO Documents

Hi Everyone,
Our company is just about to begin using message type FIDCC2 to post entries through FB60/FB65 and FB50. When you manually enter an entry through any of these transactions, an FI, CCA and PCA document are all created simultaneously. However, when posting an identical entry through message type FIDCC2, only an FI document is created. Why are the other documents not being created and is there something that I am missing from configuration or some sort of trigger that is supposed to create the other entries? Please assist as this is extremely urgent.
Thanks to all that can assist,
Pete

Hi Peter,
Is your company uses any of the profitability segment fields as well? If so how are you updating this information on to the FIDCC2 idoc and how are you generating any COPA document simultaneously. I am in the same situation and my FIDCC2 idoc updates the FI, CO, PCA components but not the COPA. I am not sure where to populae the Profitability segments on the FIDCC2 type. Please share if you have same issues in your company.
Regards
Elphick

Idoc Message Type FIDCC2 Not Posting CO Documents

Hi Everyone,
Our company is just about to begin using message type FIDCC2 to post entries through FB60/FB65 and FB50. When you manually enter an entry through any of these transactions, an FI, CCA and PCA document are all created simultaneously. However, when posting an identical entry through message type FIDCC2, only an FI document is created. Why are the other documents not being created and is there something that I am missing from configuration or some sort of trigger that is supposed to create the other entries? Please assist as this is extremely urgent.
Thanks to all that can assist,
Pete

Hi Peter,
Is your company uses any of the profitability segment fields as well? If so how are you updating this information on to the FIDCC2 idoc and how are you generating any COPA document simultaneously. I am in the same situation and my FIDCC2 idoc updates the FI, CO, PCA components but not the COPA. I am not sure where to populae the Profitability segments on the FIDCC2 type. Please share if you have same issues in your company.
Regards
Elphick

COPA- How to seggregate when 2 condion type are mapped to one copa field

Hi,
I have a scenario, wherein 2 Billing condition records PDIF & PR00 mapped to one copa field.
Going forward, I can map each of them to different copa fields, then is their a way to correct past data?
These 2 condition records have diffrent billing types.
If I go to CE1XXXX table, I have an option to pull data according billing types.
CE4XXX Segment table being a higher level table, I can't extract data per billing type.
Realignment and Reorganizing copa data doens't seem to address the fix.
Looking for some good suggestions.
Thanks,
Parimala.

Hi,
From what I think, it is probably not possible and best not to correct the past data in this case. Technically, will you have any idea as to how to break this data, and based on what weightage, percentage or conditions? And how many years back are you going to correct the data?
I can suggest that you correct the data by reversing the old data out (by posting in opposite figures), put in the new mapping, and repost the data again. However, in this case, you'll lost the history of the posting and it will take a lot of time to identify the data and re-post.
It's best to use the mapping from a logic break onwards, such as going forward in a new fiscal year... it's probably going to cost a lot of effort in re-educating the users, and correcting the reports, but it might be more effective from IT point of view.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Gimmo

Gr and ir post to copa

hi,
1) for item base on standard price, price difference during GR or IR will post to copa. does it mean if GR price difference is 10 and IR the price difference -2, then the total difference in copa is 8?
2) for item base on map, how does the difference flow to copa? the changes in stock account how to flow to copa?
3) for item base on standard price, after miro posting, why no profitability analysis in accounting doc.
4) for item base on map, after miro posting, i do not see profitability analysis in accounting document. why?
thanks

Hi,
for clarification of my understanding.
1) only price difference flow to copa which is due to deviation in standard price, correct?
2) changes in stock account for map product due to price variance, not flow to copa, correct?
3) if no variance in either price difference for standard price or changes in stock account for map, then no document posted to copa, correct?
thanks

New Write up transaction type which can post to Affiliated company

Hi Gurus,
Can you please help me with this request.
I have been asked to create the New Write up transaction type which can post to Affiliated companies copy of transaction type 700.
But i dont see any such option (Posting type) in transaction AO78.
Where as i can see the option in Transaction AO73( Acquisition) and AO68 (Retirement).
Can you please guide me how can i create this transaction type if i can and the reason if i cant.
Appreciate your time and early reply
Regards

OA81 is a general transaction. and AO78 specific for that kind of transaction types.
I think these field are hidden in AO78 for the reason that you can't use Affiliated company.
I never have seen a screen with Write up that you can fill in an Affiliated company.
For me this have only sense for postings between company code's.
You can tray to change the values by using the debugger, but it can give nice other effectslike that it is no longer possible to run the depreciation run when you have used this transaction type. Or it is working now but never again after an upgrade. There is a reason that you can't use these fields.

Define Withholding Tax Type for Payment Posting

Hey Guys, I'm configuring Withholding Tax for a company. I know the purpose for defining the withholding tax type for invoice posting, but do understand where is the Withholding tax type for payment posting used? Is it used for advance(down) payment or something else?
Thanks,

Hi ,
In some countries there is requirement that you need to deducted Withholding tax either at time of Invoice or payment which ever is ealier . so if you get Invoice first then you deduct the Withholding tax on Invoice and define the tax type and assign to company . but if you make paymnet first which we called advance or down payment then we configure Withholding tax on payment .
If a vendor is liable for withholding tax on invoice it may be liable for payment as well if you think you may pay some advances .
Please let me know if you need more information

Withholding Tax Type for Payment Posting - Customer Accumulation -

We are using the Withholding Tax Type for Payment Posting for customer with the accumulation per month and checking the minimum/maximum withholding tax base amount to calculate the tax.
When we run the F110 transaction (Automatic Payment) the system creates a BIll of Exchange as Noted items and keep the accounting document created from the SD opened. After the customer pay the bill, the bank send a file informing the payment, then we clearing the accounting document.
But the system updated the WITH_ITEM Table and filled the fields AUGBL(Clearing Document) and AUGDT (Clearing Date) with the number and date of the BIll of Exchange that was created during the F110 running.
I am confused about this situation because according the Withholding Tax Type for Payment Posting, the system only could updated the table WITH_ITEM with an accounting document. Noted items are not an accounting document.
I would like to konw if the system is working properly, or can have something wrong in our configuracion?
Thanks and regards
Augusto

Hi ,
In some countries there is requirement that you need to deducted Withholding tax either at time of Invoice or payment which ever is ealier . so if you get Invoice first then you deduct the Withholding tax on Invoice and define the tax type and assign to company . but if you make paymnet first which we called advance or down payment then we configure Withholding tax on payment .
If a vendor is liable for withholding tax on invoice it may be liable for payment as well if you think you may pay some advances .
Please let me know if you need more information

How to block particular condition type not being posted

Hi,
We don't want a particular condition type ( customized & accruel ) to be posted into accounting when creating a billing. That condition type is deleted and after that this is how it works now.
1. When a billing is cretaed from a new sale order ( which does not have that condition type ) it works fine.
2. When a billing is created from a sale order which refers to the old sale order which in turn has this condition type, then this conditon type is posted into accounting.
Can some one help in this issue so that I want to block this condition type being get posted in accounting. Is there any Userexit or can it be done with other options. I am an ABAPer, please give specific answer.

Hi Jagadish,
The reason why we do account determination is that we would want the system to post the respective amounts to respective G/L accounts automatically. What amounts to be posted to what G/L accounts is decided by the Account keys .
Now if for a particular condition type in the pricing procedure if you remove Account key the system will not post to the G/L accounts. But generally in this case I believe while creating the Bill system will throw an error in account determination.
For that what you can do is create completely new accont key and assign a provisional G/L account which is not to be included in your Balance Sheet accounts or P & L accounts (can be restriscted by FI Guys).
But remember to use a completely new oricing proicedure for this case.
Hope this helps.....
J Nagesh

Billing type is not updating in COPA table

HI Gurus
Billing type is not updating for few billing documents in ECC COPA table CE11000 but for few documents billing type is updating correctly in ECC COPA table CE1100
Example 1 for billing document 10351144 billing type is not updating in ECC COPA table CE11000 billing type ZDN
Example 2 for billing document 10354965 billing type is updating in ECC COPA table CE11000
Billing type is same for the both billing documents but its updating for one document and it is not updating for another document
Please help me to find out the rout cause

hi, can your replay the problem in your system?
if so , I suggest you to set a user breakpoint in ERP function BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST, (the user need to use the Middleware user not your foreground login user)
And when billing document inbound to ERP, SAP will call the function. then you can check if the CO-PA fields has been filled correctly or not.

How can you tell what type of credits you have?

My iTunes account shows that I have 4 credits on the top right of iTunes but I can't tell what type of credits I have. I have sent numerous emails to Apple iTunes support and they just keep telling me that it should say 1 song credit or 1 TV episode credit, etc. but all it says are 4 credits so I can't tell what the credits are for? Can someone help? I have the latest version of iTunes for Windows on a Windows 7 PC.

I updated QuickTime and now the top right under my name displays the number of credits and the types of credits. Prior to this update, it only showed the name.

Sales Office information not posted to COPA.

Dear Experts,
We have created a new distribution channel in our system. When we post invoices using the new distribution channel the sales office information is not getting posted to COPA.
Is their any missing configuration for this issue or any thing else.
Pls help to solve this out and how to correct the already posted information. For those, the sales office information is not avaliable in the COPA and those information are not picking up to the reports.
How to corrct this.
Many thanks in advance.
best Regards
Thanura

Hi,
yes, SALES OFFICE characteritc is activated.
Other distribution channals we are having, sales office information get posted to COPA. the issue we are facing is for the newly created one.
Best Regards,
Thanura

Billling Type RE credits posted to COPA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for