BizTalk 2006 R2 Tutorial (EAI) and KB888498

I'm a beginner at BizTalk.  I'm trying to go through the tutorial 1 (EAI application) in a lab setup.  I'm at the last step where I copied the RepRequestAccepted.xml to the C:\tutorial\Filedrop\ReceiveRequest folder.  The file didn't disappear as expected.  I got Error event 7183 "File transport does not have read/write privileges for receive location "C:\tutorial\Filedrop\ReceiveRequest".  I tried to follow the resolution suggestion in KB888498, trying various accounts/credentials (even domain administrator) by entering them in the Authentication tab of the File Transport Properties page.  However, when I did that, I got this error:  "Transport properties validation failed.  Alternate credentials to access the file folder cannot be supplied while accesing local drive or a mapped network drive".  Can you tell me under which account or group is this process supposed to run under?  How do I fix this?  What did I miss?   Thanks! 

With respect to the step "Install BizTalk for the tutorial" -> "Configure BizTalk Hosts as trusted" -> "Create a new host instance for the BizTalkServerIsolatedHost" host, does this host run under an account different from the account under which the "BizTalkServerApplication" host runs?  that is, BizTalk Admin Console -> BizTalk Group -> Platform Settings -> Host Instances -> do the BizTalkServerIsolatedHost and BizTalkServerApplication use the same Logon?  Thanks!

Similar Messages

  • BizTalk 2006 R2 and SQL 2012

    Just wondering if anybody is running BizTalk 2006 R2 on SQL 2012?  I can see it's not supported on the link below;
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/926628
    But we are currently running it on SQL 2008 R2 which works fine (unsupported).  We need to migrate our BizTalk databases to SQL 2012

    There are too many dependencies on the SQL version. You can try but 95% you just lost your time. 5% you could manage this, because MSFT claims some level of the back compatibility. I know nobody who managed this. For sure, there would be a lot of tuning
    up.
    Leonid Ganeline [BizTalk MVP] <a href="http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/20258.biztalk-integration-development-architecture.aspx">BizTalk Development Architecture</a>

  • BizTalk 2006 R2 Receive Location )File - XLS) Being Read Twice?

    Scenario: IBM ESB is writing a XLS file to a UNC path that is polled by BizTalk 2006 R2 Receive Location (File) but the file is being processed twice on a few occasions that cannot be reproduced. The polling interval is set to 60 seconds and then the file
    is removed. My developed confirmed the duplicate processing via our database that records incoming messages.
    Any idea on how to proceed?
    -Shawn
    Shawn ([email protected])

    Update! 
    I was able to duplicate this issue but I haven’t determined root cause yet. This one is a bit tricky. I kept processing files until I noticed some warnings in the EventViewer. The BizTalk service became disabled and then re-enabled
    causing the message to be processed again. Any ideas?
    4:20:59 PM – I re-enabled but this must automatically be done by BizTalk for the duplicate message to be processed
    The following BizTalk host instance has initialized successfully.
     BizTalk host name: BizTalkServerApplication
     Windows service name: BTSSvc$BizTalkServerApplication
    For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
    4:20:32 PM
    An error occurred that requires the BizTalk service to terminate. The most common causes are the following:
     1) An unexpected out of memory error.
     OR
     2) An inability to connect or a loss of connectivity to one of the BizTalk databases.
     The service will shutdown and auto-restart in 1 minute. If the problematic database remains unavailable, this cycle will repeat.
     Error message: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation.
     Error source: mscorlib
     BizTalk host name: BizTalkServerApplication
     Windows service name: BTSSvc$BizTalkServerApplication
    For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
    4:19:48 PM
    All receive locations are being temporarily disabled because either the MessageBox or Configuration database is not available. When these databases become available, the
    receive locations will be automatically enabled.
    For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
    4:19:34 PM
    The Messaging Engine failed to retrieve the configuration from the database. Details:"The database cannot be accessed because the system is recovering from an earlier database
    failure. ".
    For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
    Shawn ([email protected])

  • Biztalk 2006 issue

    Hello:
    We have change the DNS setting of our Standby SQL Server to production.
    I see connection coming from BIZTALK server into SQL Server and all required BizTalk Services are running fine.
    I am getting following error as shown below when I try to change or refresh from BizTalk Admin Console
    Any help is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Jay
    Error:-
    TITLE: BizTalk Server 2006 Administration Console
    The Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator (MSDTC) may not be configured correctly.
     Ensure that the MSDTC service is running and DTC network access is allowed on the BizTalk, SQL and SSO Master servers. For more information, see "MSDTC Configuration settings required for BizTalk Server" in the BizTalk Server Help.
    Internal Error The transaction has already been implicitly or explicitly committed or aborted (Microsoft.BizTalk.ExplorerOM)
    For help, click:
    http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=47400&ProdName=Microsoft+BizTalk+Server+2006+R2&ProdVer=3.6.1404.0&EvtSrc=Microsoft.BizTalk.ExplorerOM.Resources&EvtID=IDS_ERR_DTC_MISCONFIGURED
    BUTTONS:
    OK

    Hi Aaditya,
    Have you
    enabled MSDTC on the BizTalk Server
    Maheshkumar S Tiwari|User
    Page | http://tech-findings.blogspot.com/

  • Biztalk 2006 (not r2) - original soap fault capturing

    Hi,
    I'm working on BizTalk 2006 (NOT R2) and using the old Soap Adapter. Is there a way I can get hold of the original soap fault that was received by the adapter rather than the one that the adapter itself generates (where it adds NACK) to the response?
    Thanks,
    --Anoop

    Let me explain ...
    This is what end system web service returns as a fault ...
    <NS1:Envelope xmlns:NS1="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
    <NS1:Body>
    <NS1:Fault>
    <faultcode>NS1:Server</faultcode>
    <faultstring>User generated exception: xyz </faultstring>
    <faultactor/>
    <detail>
    <ErrorSummary>
    <ErrorCode>EC0001</ErrorCode>
    <ErrorMsg>Unknown system error.</ErrorMsg>
    <ErrorSystem>SomeSystemName</ErrorSystem>
    </ErrorSummary>
    </detail>
    </NS1:Fault>
    </NS1:Body>
    </NS1:Envelope>
    This is what SOAP Adapter converts it to by default:
    <SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
    <SOAP:Body>
    <SOAP:Fault>
    <faultcode>Microsoft BizTalk Server Negative Acknowledgment </faultcode>
    <faultstring>An error occurred while processing the message, refer to the details section for more information </faultstring>
    <faultactor>http://somewebserviceurl</faultactor>
    <detail>
    <ns0:NACK Type="NACK" xmlns:ns0="http://schema.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003/NACKMessage.xsd">
    <NAckID>{0381BF90-CFCC-403C-BB61-9B0D831F7CB9}</NAckID>
    <ErrorCode>0xc0c01f07</ErrorCode>
    <ErrorCategory>0</ErrorCategory>
    <ErrorDescription>SoapException: User generated exception: xyz</ErrorDescription>
    </ns0:NACK>
    </detail>
    </SOAP:Fault>
    </SOAP:Body>
    </SOAP:Envelope>
    Now when you create a catch exception block with a SoapException object, what you'll get basically is the Fault after it is converted by SOAP Adapter. What gets logged to the event log as error text is the text contained in ErrorDescription node of NACK.
    What I want to access is <detail> section of the original fault message.
    Thanks,
    --Anoop

  • Dynamic Loading Maps BizTalk 2006 R2 upgrade to BizTalk 2013

    We are in the process of upgrading BizTalk to 2013 R2 from BizTalk 2006 R2.
    In an orchestration we are dynamic using map type classes.
    It works fine in 2006 R2, 2010 but not 2013 R2.
    When I run the below code in VS 2008 it retrieves the class types from the assemblies.
    In VS 2013 it does not.  Why?
    //CCIJIS_WarrantClearRequest_X_MCIJIS_CLWR
    string typeName =
    "x";
    string className =
    "x";
    Type mapType =
    Type.GetType("MCIJIS_RCLW_X_CCIJIS_WarrantClearResponse,
    CCIJIS.State.Transforms, Version=1.2.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=d18be0be6c153b84");
                mapType =
    Type.GetType("CCIJIS.State.Transforms.MCIJIS_RCLW_X_CCIJIS_WarrantClearResponse");
    if (mapType ==
    null)
    foreach (Assembly
    a in
    AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies())
    if (a.FullName.Contains("CCIJIS.State.Transforms"))
                            typeName = a.FullName;
                            mapType = a.GetType(a.FullName);
    foreach (Type
    type in a.GetTypes())
                                className = type.FullName;
    James Nance

    Hi James,
    Try debugging your code by attaching Visual Studio to the BTSNTSVC.exe process and see where exactly your code is failing.
    For debugging your orchestration refer:
    BizTalk Orchestration – Orchestration debugging inside Visual Studio
    Checkpoint: Ensure you have using correct fully-qualified map name.
    Rachit
    Please mark as answer or vote as helpful if my reply does

  • Difference between EAI and SOA? when to use which one?

    Hi,
    Please share this information, What IS EAI and What is SOA? why they came and what its use, and when we have to use which of these?
    Thanks.

    EAI is the mother of all the integrations. EAI acts as a connector and can integrate at large scale however SOA is another integration technique which is used for small scale integration. SOA is an approach to have software resources in an enterprise available and discoverable on network as well defined services. Each service would achieve a predefined business objective and perform discrete units of work. The services are independent and do not depend on the context or state of the other services. They work within distributed systems architecture.
    Regards,
    Anuj

  • My macbook pro 2006 fan goes high and then makes a fast beep and shuts down it been happening since i updated

    my macbook pro 2006 fan goes high and then makes a fast beep and shuts down it been happening since i updated it should i update to lion?

    No, this problem should be solved.
    The MBP shuts down when too hot, to protect itself. First see if it is a process running astray: start Activity Monitor (in Applications/Utilities) choose <all processes> and click the %CPU column: are there processes that are using more than 50% cpu power? If yes click it and quit it, and tell us which one.

  • HT1430 my phone seems to be in some kind of tutorial mode and is talking to me.  I can't make it stop and don't know how I got there.

    My iphone seems to be in a tutorial mode and is talking to me.  I can't make it stop and I can't use it without tapping each key twice.  How do I get back to regular user mode?

    It sounds like you have VoiceOver on.
    This article tells you how to turn it off: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3577

  • EAI AND WEB SERVICES

    Hi,
    What is the difference between web services and EAI ?
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    Salient Differences between Traditional EAI Solutions and Web Services
    A few essential differences between traditional EAI solutions and Web Services are, as follows:
    Simple: There is no doubt that Web Services are much simpler to design, develop, maintain, and use as compared to a typical EAI solution which may involve distributed technology such as DCOM and CORBA. Once the framework of developing and using Web Services is ready, it will be relatively easy to automate new business processes spanning across multiple applications.
    Open Standards: Unlike proprietary EAI solutions, Web Services are based on open standards such as UDDI, SOAP, HTTP and this is probably the single most important factor that would lead to the wide adoption of Web Services. The fact that they are built on existing and ubiquitous protocols eliminates the need for companies to invest in supporting new network protocols.
    Flexible: Since EAI solutions may require point-to-point integration, changes made at one end have to be propagated to the other end, making them very rigid and time consuming in nature. Web Services based integration is quite flexible, as it is built on loose coupling between the application publishing the services and the application using those services.
    Cheap: EAI solutions, such as message brokers, are very expensive to implement. Web Services, in the future, may accomplish many of the same goals - cheaper and faster.
    Scope: EAI solutions, such as message brokers, integrate applications treating them as single entities, whereas Web Services allow companies to break down big applications into small independent logical units and build wrappers around them. For example, a company can write wrappers for different business components of an ERP application such as order management - purchase order acceptance, status of order, order confirmation, accounts receivable, and accounts payable.
    Efficient: As mentioned in the previous point, Web Services allow applications to be broken down into smaller logical components, which makes the integration of applications easier as it is done on a granular basis. This makes Web Services solutions for EAI much more efficient than traditional EAI solutions.
    Dynamic: Web Services provide a dynamic approach to integration by offering dynamic interfaces, whereas traditional EAI solutions are pretty much static in nature.
    Read this article:
    <a href="http://www.webservicesarchitect.com/content/articles/samtani01.asp">EAI and Web Services</a>
    Regards,
    Boris

  • EAI and Webservices

    Which is the intersection point between EAI and Webservices?
    Regards.

    Hi Harmeet,
    I hope its because ODI is an E-LT and OWB is ETL tools. As i said in the previous post E-LT approach needs less servers and provides good speed.
    Thanks,
    Guru

  • Which oracle client works with both Oracle 11.2.0.2 and BizTalk 2006 R2

    Hi there
    My Oracle11.2.0.2 is installed on linux server. My Biztalk2006R2 is installed on Windows Server 2003 R2 x64. I have already installed BizTalk Adapter for Oracle on the Biztalk server and now require to install Oracle Client to make Biztalk able to retrieve data from Oracle11.2.0.2 using the oracle client.
    From the following link,
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa559822%28v=BTS.20%29.aspx
    I came to know that the only oracle clients compatible with Biztalk adapter for oracle are as below:
    1) Oracle client 8i
    2) oracle client 9i
    3) oracle client 10i
    Now I need to install an oracle client on biztalk server in order to make biztalk talk to oracle and retrieve data from it.
    Question1: which of the above clients should i install on biztalk server that is compatible with both Oracle11.2.0.2 as well as Biztalk server 2006 R2?
    Question2: How to install and configure this client to make it work correctly?
    Please help.. thanks.
    Edited by: manibest on 19-Dec-2012 03:27
    Edited by: manibest on 19-Dec-2012 03:27

    The Biztalk Adapter interface with Oracle software has information, requirements per referenced document that does not make sense.
    E.g. "10i" does not exist and the requirement "Oracle ODBC driver 9.2.0.5.4" means that only 9.2 Client can be used. (Mixing parts from one Database Client product version with another version is not allowed/supported/certified.)
    Btw, does that machine happen to have Itanium hardware? (probably no, since you stated x64)
    For Oracle's OS requirements, 2003 was certified with/from 9.2.0.3 (and likely also terminal patch set version 9.2.0.8). Not sure about Server 2003 R2, 32 or 64-bit. I'm pretty sure 10.2 was certified on 2003 R2, but the note likely refers to 10.1 versions (before it was known it would be labeled 10g, g for grid replacing the i ).
    This FAQ may have some more information: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/windows/faq-100614.html
    For Oracle client - server interoperability and certification, there's a support matrix on MOS. See doc id 207303.1.
    It seems 9.2 is supported on the wire to operate with 11.2 server, but Client with at least patch set 9.2.0.4 is required.
    So, I guess best bet is to find updated requirements.
    If you manage to get hold of 9.2.0.5, after verifying that 2003 R2 is ok, then it looks like the puzzle could be put together for a complete picture.
    For ease of install, take a look at the Instant Client. (However, there's no 9.2 IC, that type of client install came later)
    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/features/instant-client/index-097480.html
    Edit;
    some corrections, specially about 9.2 version
    Edited by: orafad on Dec 19, 2012 10:58 PM

  • BizTalk 2006 Event Log Warnings - Cannot insert duplicate key row in object 'dta_MessageFieldValues' with unique index 'IX_MessageFieldValues'.

    We have been seeing the following 'warnings' in the event log of our BizTalk machine since upgrading to BTS 2006. They seem to occur randomly 6 or 8 times per day.
    Does anyone know what this means and what needs to be done to clear it up? we have only one BizTalk server which is running on only one machine.
    I am new to BizTalk, so I am unable to find how many tracking host instances running for BizTalk server. Also, can you please let me know that we can configure only one instance for one server/machine?
    Source: BAM EventBus Service
    Event: 5
    Warning Details: Execute batch error. Exception information: TDDS failed to batch execution of streams. SQLServer: bizprod, Database: BizTalkDTADb.Cannot insert duplicate key row in object 'dta_MessageFieldValues'
    with unique index 'IX_MessageFieldValues'. The statement has been terminated..

    Other than ensuring that there exists a separate and single tracking host instance, you're getting an error about duplicate keys.. which implies that you're trying to Create a BAM Activity twice with the same data.
    I suggest you have a in-depth examination of the BAM (TPE or API) associated with the orchestration. In TPE ensure that the first binding you select is the "Instance Id" or "Message Id" before going ahead to map the ports or others.
    Regards.

  • Using Federated Security in BizTalk against custom Token Provider and Custom Token

    Hi,
    I as the topic states, I'm trying to get BizTalk to use a Custom Token Provider with custom tokens.
    So I thought this would be rather painless using ws2007FederationHttpBinding but got stuck. The problem is that the service expect soap action and a special structure (se example):
    Request:
    <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:wsc="common.namespace" xmlns:ws="securitytoken.namespace">
       <soapenv:Header>
          <wsc:AutHeader>      
    Containing Custom Auth header information tags, about 20 or so
          </wsc:AutHeader>
       </soapenv:Header>
       <soapenv:Body>
          <ws:SECSSecurityTokenCreate_V1_0InputArgs>
             <ws:SecurityTokenCreateRequest>
                <ws:securityToken><!-- signed SAML assertion --></ws:securityToken>
             </ws:SecurityTokenCreateRequest>
          </ws:SECSSecurityTokenCreate_V1_0InputArgs>
       </soapenv:Body>
    </soapenv:Envelope>
    Response:
    <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
    <soap:Body>
    <SECSSecurityTokenCreate_V1_0OutputArgs xmlns:ns2="common.namespace" xmlns="tokenservice,namespace">
    <SecurityTokenCreateResponse>
    <securityToken> <!-- THE Custom TOKEN --> </securityToken>
    </SecurityTokenCreateResponse>
    <ResponseState>
    <ns2:ErrorCode>0</ns2:ErrorCode>
    <ns2:Severity>0</ns2:Severity>
    <ns2:ComponentId>201</ns2:ComponentId>
    <ns2:StrErrorCode xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:nil="true" />
    <ns2:Message>OK</ns2:Message>
    <ns2:NativeError xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:nil="true" />
    <ns2:LogSequence xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:nil="true" />
    </ResponseState>
    </SECSSecurityTokenCreate_V1_0OutputArgs>
    </soap:Body> </soap:Envelope>
    Error Message in BizTalk, when I send message via ws2007FederationHTTPBinding to the SOAP service, as expected the soap structure dosent match the expected one from the server, most obvisly is the missing SOAP action and incorrect BODY element.
    System.ServiceModel.ProtocolException: The content type text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 of the response message does not match the content type of the binding (application/soap+xml; charset=utf-8). If using a custom encoder, be sure that the IsContentTypeSupported method is implemented properly. The first 521 bytes of the response were: '<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope">
    <soap:Body>
    <soap:Fault>
    <soap:Code>
    <soap:Value>Server</soap:Value>
    </soap:Code>
    <soap:Reason>
    <!--1 or more repetitions:-->
    <soap:Text xml:lang="en">Missing operation for soapAction [null] and body element [{http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512}RequestSecurityToken] with SOAP Version [SOAP 1.2]</soap:Text>
    </soap:Reason>
    </soap:Fault>
    </soap:Body>
    </soap:Envelope>'. ---> System.Net.WebException: The remote server returned an error: (500) Internal Server Error.
    at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.GetResponse()
    at System.Servi
    My plan to solve this is to try using beahviors added to the "inner" wcf binding that will help reconstruct the message from the standard form that I has, but I'm a bit vorried that I start to solve this and later on I'll have to add custom handling
    for token extraction and handling since the token should be placed in a custom header in the soap envelope with custom namespace =).
    So my question is, could this be solved via sw2007FederationHttpBinding or is an orchestration and some custom code for signing the path forward?
    Thanks in advance for any help or guidance!
    /Mattias

    It's a little tough to use sw2007FederationHttpBinding, I faced similar situation before. :(

  • New Mac Mini and 2006/2007 Wireless Keyboard and Mighty Mouse

    Will my old wireless keyboard and mighty mouse from 2006 and 2007 work with the new Mac Mini?

    Thank You!

Maybe you are looking for

  • Po workflow( release strategy)

    hi,   we had defined release strategy for po workflow. i assigned the users to release codes in SPRO. what my doubt is .... is there any further configuration is there to go purchase order to agent inbox. i am not defining workflow template. is it re

  • Reorder columns of Interactive Report

    Hi, why moving IR columns with up/down buttons at Interactive Report Attributes page has no effect when IR displays? It always displays columns in the order defined by its sql statement. Thanks

  • GotoAndStop at the the root of the timeline

    HI I have a movie clip with onRollOver and onRollOut script attached. When clicked I would like the root of the timeline to move to a different label. At present I have tried the following first script on the MC to move the root timeline, however thi

  • Cannot switch to tty (terminal, console) with ctrl - alt - F#

    Hi, I have been stably using arch for half a year, but never managed to switch to another tty. I have three suspicions: one is that xmodmap somehow interferes, as I switched capslock and ctrl, and also alt and winkey (but that is not an issue on a fe

  • Backup on WRT54GS hwv.5.1 doesn´t work!

    Hi Everyone, I need help. First problem: I can´t try a device backup from Administration/Config Management. Second problem: protocol IPX/SPX doesn´t work. Who know´s why? Please, let me know. Thk.