Biztalk send ports behaviour

Hi,
I have a scenario like i need to push into my database the path with filename like this.
c:asffloder\gbn.xml
but when i use the statement like this in my orchestration
SndBkUpFilePort(Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.Address);
i get this as c:asffloder\%Sourcefilename%
i have constructed my filename for ex gbn.xml in my orchestration
when i use FILE.ReceivedFileName i only get the name like gbn .xml
how to get like this c:asffloder\gbn.xml?

Hi Sujith,
So you have received the received filename property value ( when you simply use that you said you get gbn .xml).
Following statement can get the value as you want:
Replace: YourInboundMsg to your BizTalk message variable name you have defined for your inbound message
YourInboundMsg(BTS.InboundTransportLocation).Substring(0, YourInboundMsg(BTS.InboundTransportLocation).Length - 5)+YourInboundMsg(File.receivedFileName);
BTS.InboundTransportLocation will give value of your inbound message's path like "c:asffloder\*.xml"
File.receivedFileName will give the received file name ass gbn.xml.
So construct a string with these properties to get the value as you desired.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Similar Messages

BizTalk Send Port Error

We are getting error on send port after some changes in the map, but there is no change in the map which is throwing error -
Event Type: Error
Event Source: BizTalk Server 2009
Event Category: (1)
Event ID: 5754
Date:  11/26/2013
Time:  1:14:22 PM
User:  N/A
Computer: XXXX
Description:
A message sent to adapter "WCF-Custom" on send port "SndABCD" with URI "mssql://ABCDSQLDB/INSTANCE/ABCDReport?" is suspended.
Error details: The system cannot find the file specified. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070002)
MessageId: {A79F62AD-3C63-4543-9FEF-2682CF83106A}
InstanceID: {941EBEF7-7008-451C-AEBE-C7407462F943}
For more information, see Help and Support Center at
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.

I have checked below links already which suggest, gac the DLL, but did not work for me -->
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/01791899-a0bf-451d-9004-fe8b696a9270/custom-functoid-the-system-cannot-find-the-file-specified?forum=biztalkediandas2
http://blogs.eliasen.dk/Technical/post/2010/01/17/TheSystemCannotFindTheFileSpecified.aspx
http://stevestechnotes.blogspot.com/2008_02_01_archive.html

Biztalk send port

Hi Everyone,
when i use the below syntax
SndBukdFilePort(Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.Address)
i get the path as \\dfsdf\dfsfsd\%SourceFilename%\
is there any way i could remove that soucefilename and just get only the path?

What are you planning on doing with it?
You can take a substring of the path, if you want to use it for example reporting. That '%' is pretty easy to find :).
If you want to control the filename, you can also set the ReceiveFileName -property when assigning the message:
msgResultMessage(BTS.ReceiveFileName) = "MyResultMessage.xml";
And even if the path is \\dfsdf\dfsfsd\%SourceFilename%\
it would result -> \\dfsdf\dfsfsd\MyResultMessage.xml

BizTalk Server 2013 and deployment MSI with dynamic send ports

Hello community, wonder if any help out there for this odd problem.
Deployment of application msi fails into BizTalk 2013 prod environment, fails when deploying the project dll that contains all the orchestrations,
and reports a failure to apply early bindings. The only early bindings in this project are dynamic send ports. I cannot recreate the problem in in my QAS environment where deployments of the same msi works fine.
I can build an msi without any bindings at all except for the dynamically created ones, and this also display the same behaviour on import.
I have test deployed a 2nd unrelated app that also uses dynamic send ports, and this displays the problem.
Adding the assembly directly to BizTalk console displays the same behaviour.
Deployment of msi apps without dynamic send ports are ok.
The dynamic ports use a pipeline including a custom pipeline component which I can confirm is available in the correct directory
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft BizTalk Server 2013\Pipeline Components
No specific further detail is available in the error except.
Import Wizard[09/05/2014 08:20:47]: Error in Importing Application
Import Wizard[09/05/2014 08:20:47]: Change requests failed for some resources.
BizTalkAssemblyResourceManager failed to complete end type change request.
Unable to deploy early bindings.
Failed to update binding information.
Error in the application.
Other information that may be relevant:
The main difference between QAS and PROD is that PROD is a two node cluster. Import behaviour is the same if attempted on either node. Assemblies are installed in both nodes currently.
The dynamic ports are set on handlers that are non-clustered hosts (all are for adapter type SMTP).
I have ensured that all the adapter handlers are identically setup in both environments.
The project files were migrated to BizTalk 2013 from BizTalk 2010, imported and then converted using VS 2012.
The msi has installed the assemblies as per usual and they do exist in the .net 4 gac
There is a reference to a shared resource in a different application, this application is installed and imported ok.
I’m a bit stuck at what to try now, I have option where I could recreate the dynamic ports from scratch in the orchestrations and redeploy to dev in the hope it’s something that VS2012 didn’t handle too gracefully
when converting the project. I could move the functionality into a helper class and forget about using dynamic sends, rather not go down that route. I'm still suspecting this is small difference in setup
of the group between QAS and PROD but I can't see anything jumping out.
Any comments are most welcome.

The dynamic ports use a pipeline including a custom pipeline component which I can confirm is available in the correct directory
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft BizTalk Server 2013\Pipeline Components
I’m a bit stuck at what to try now, I have option where I could recreate the dynamic ports from scratch in the orchestrations and redeploy to dev in the hope it’s something
that VS2012 didn’t handle too gracefully when converting the project.
Two things.
1. That's what I would do first, recreate (really just change and reset the properties) the Orchestration Ports in Visual Studio.
2. Probably not related but, Custom Pipeline Components should not be placed in the Pipeline Components folder. All Custom Pipeline Components should be in the GAC only. The Pipeline Components folder
is a compatibility vestige from BizTalk Server 2004.

BizTalk 2013 SFTP Adapter Dynamic SFTP send port exception: Open remote file for write error

I am using BizTalk 2013 SFTP adapter. I defined a Dynamic One-Way
send port on BizTalk server administration.
Below is the error I'm getting on BizTalk while trying to write files to a designated folder on a client's SFTP server.
When defining the same path and properties on a Static One-Way send port everything works properly and the files are being saved on the SFTP server.
A message sent to adapter "SFTP" on send port "ComverseSFTP_1.0.0.0_ComverseSFTP.SendFileToSFTP_SendFileToSFTPServer_f6b86b86a22079f8" with URI "SFTP://abc.xyz.com:22/upload/%SourceFileName%"
is suspended.
Error details: Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.SftpInvoker.SftpException: Open remote file for write error.
Server stack trace:
   at Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.SftpInvoker.SftpInvoker.OpenRemoteFileWrite(String fileName, Int32 fileOffset)
   at Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.SftpInvoker.SftpFileWriterStream.Write(Byte[] buffer, Int32 offset, Int32 count)
   at Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.Sftp.SftpOutputChannel.Send(Message message, TimeSpan timeOut)
   at System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.StackBuilderSink._PrivateProcessMessage(IntPtr md, Object[] args, Object server, Object[]& outArgs)
   at System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.StackBuilderSink.AsyncProcessMessage(IMessage msg, IMessageSink replySink)
Exception rethrown at [0]:
   at System.Runtime.AsyncResult.End[TAsyncResult](IAsyncResult result)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.SendAsyncResult.End(SendAsyncResult result)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.EndCall(String action, Object[] outs, IAsyncResult result)
Exception rethrown at [1]:
   at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.HandleReturnMessage(IMessage reqMsg, IMessage retMsg)
   at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateInvoke(MessageData& msgData, Int32 type)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.IOutputChannel.EndSend(IAsyncResult result)
   at Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.Wcf.Runtime.WcfClient`2.SendCallback(IAsyncResult result)
MessageId: {926F44F2-9180-4B33-96FF-9E4CBC459382}
InstanceID: {36A50A7F-63C4-48D9-903D-A33C85DDAE36}
Can you please assist with explaining why are we getting this exception?
Thank you for your help.

Below is the error I'm getting on BizTalk while trying to write files to a designated folder on a client's SFTP server.
When defining the same path and properties on a Static One-Way send port everything works properly and the files are being saved on the SFTP server.
A message sent to adapter "SFTP" on send port "ComverseSFTP_1.0.0.0_ComverseSFTP.SendFileToSFTP_SendFileToSFTPServer_f6b86b86a22079f8" with URI "SFTP://abc.xyz.com:22/upload/%SourceFileName%"
is suspended.
Error details: Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.SftpInvoker.SftpException: Open remote file for write error.
Hi Yaeli1,
From the error message above, please check the permission for file writing , it seems that this issue is related to access permission.
Best regards,
Angie
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

How to configure Send Handler for BizTalk 2013 Dynamic Send Port on deployment?

Hi,
I do know how to manually configure a send handler for a dynamic send port in BizTalk 2013 Administration console. Though, once you export your application's configuration to a binding file, the dynamic send port's configuration does not
contain any information regarding the send handler. When you try to use this binding file when deploying your application your dynamic port's send handler falls back to the default host instance.
So my question is, how could we automate this process to avoid manual step in a dynamic port configuration during deployment?
Thank you,
--Vlad

Hey vlad,
As discussed at work in the office.. I woudl take the powershelll approach for now as a workaround. Here's a trivial script for my local dev box (all in one biztalk & SQL) (must be run in an x86 powershell session):
param
[string] $bizTalkDbServer = ".",
[string] $bizTalkDbName = "BizTalkMgmtDb",
[string] $fileHostInstance = "SendingHost",
[string] $sendPortName = "sm_dynamic_sp_test"
[System.reflection.Assembly]::LoadWithPartialName("Microsoft.BizTalk.ExplorerOM") | Out-Null
$catalog = New-Object Microsoft.BizTalk.ExplorerOM.BtsCatalogExplorer
$catalog.ConnectionString = "SERVER=$bizTalkDbServer;DATABASE=$bizTalkDbName;Integrated Security=SSPI"
foreach($sp in $catalog.SendPorts)
if($sp.Name -eq $sendPortName)
  "Found send port $($sp.Name), analyzing send handler"
  foreach($sh in $sp.DynamicSendHandlers)
   if($sh.SendHandler.TransportType.Name -eq "FILE")
    if($sh.SendHandler.Host.Name -ne $fileHostInstance)
     "Changing $($sh.Name) send handler to '$fileHostInstance' from '$($sh.SendHandler.Host.Name)'"
     $sp.SetSendHandler("FILE", $fileHostInstance)
    else
     "Send handler for $($sp.Name) is already '$fileHostInstance' ignorning .. "
$catalog.SaveChanges()

ACK/NACK Handling In Biztalk 2010 Orchestration - SFTP send port

Hi,
I am using SFTP adapter and wants to get ACK/NACK in orchestration. I have implemented all the required steps mentioned in the below blog:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kevinsmi/archive/2004/07/03/172574.aspx
I am getting the ACKs, but in case of failure I do not get any NACK. Does anyone know how to get it ?
Thanks,
Iqra

SFTP adapter doesn't have any configuration property to get the acknowledgement.
To get the ack/nack you have to let the BizTalk engine with the property “BTS.AckRequired”
set to true. With Orchestration this property can be set by enabling Delivery Notification
to Transmitted.
The DeliveryFailureNotification is typically only used for one-way send port not for solicit-response port. Following article can guide you on Delivery notification
in Orchestration.
http://kentweare.blogspot.co.uk/2007/11/biztalk-delivery-notification.html
Along with the other obviously settings for delivery notifications in orchestration, also set the
Send-Port’s retry to zero (0). This setting is most overseen by many.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Send Port In BizTalk Cluster

Hello Guys,
I have a Cluster BizTalk environment with clustered send ports. Firewall is configured to allow connections from/to cluster IP. But when send ports are calling an external service, requests are getting blocked as it's not coming from Cluster IP, it's
coming from the BizTalk server IP.
Did I miss something in the configuration?
I am hoping all the off-ramps from clustered send ports will coming from Cluster IP.
Please advise.

No when using clustered IP while transmissions it is always the LOCAL IP that is sent. This is because by default in the binding the local/physical IP will ALWAYS be at a higher priority than any other assigned IP's. If you use ipconfig /all you will find
the host IP listed as "preferred". This is the IP that will be populated in the IP Headers as SOURCE. Secondly, when using send ports unless the receiver has issues (flooding) in handling multiple clients, it is NOT REQUIRED TO Cluster.
Cluster (remember) is for high-availability and more in line with services implemented - receive ports and such.
Since you're calling an external service, ask the firewall team to NAT the IP's associated with the physical hosts under ONE external IP. So to the called service, irrespective of the host sending the request the external system will see it as coming
from ONE HOST.
Regards.

Biztalk 2010 : Dynamic send Port Block : HTTP Adapter

Hi
I have a customer who makes an intensive use of the DefaultServerApp host instance.
All of his applications use this instance for dynamic send port ( HTTP send adapter)
The problem is sometimes the messages accumulate in the message queue of the HTTP Send adapter and I have to restart the host instance to fix the problem until it appears again a month later.
note: many messages are timed out , could this to be the root cause ?

Secondary messagebox
-why !!!!
You have an issue in just one of the host instances. Where is this Secondary messagebox came into play? Is your database struggle with the load and does the message process
affect “all your processing in BizTalk”?
Or is this issue in host instance/design related. As you have many dynamic ports all of them will be using the default host instance. Some of these processes may have high
volume or high size messages so your host instance may be struggling to process the message and could cause the memory/process usage related issue. Exactly for these reasons Microsoft has given an option to tweaking the host processing and throttling setting.
Adding an additional messagebox database would be overdo for your issue.
Consider tweaking the throttling settings. If the process memory was increasing
continuously and if your investigation boils down to process memory usage for this issue, consider tweaking the
Process memory usage and Physical memory usage throttling thresholds.
Consider the suggestions from this MSDN article..
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918643
Also consider about adding more RAM, physical memory.
As I mentioned in my earlier post, run the messagebox viewer tool and review its reports for health of the server.
Also ensure you have the latest version of Cumulative Update for your version of BizTalk installed. In some of the CUs, fix for memory leak has been included.
Another suggestion, review the design where you have so many dynamic ports. May be some of these processes have high volume or high size messages and since all use the dynamic
ports hence the same host instance you could have this issue. Consider to move away from dynamic port for some of the processes, if you find either high volume or high size message processing.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Error in send port executed procedure in Biztalk and SQL Server

Hi,
I have a send port which call the below stored procedure
USE
GO
SET
ANSI_NULLS
ON
GO
SET
QUOTED_IDENTIFIER
ON
GO
ALTER
@ProcessId
VARCHAR
(100),
@FilePath
we are revieving the Error as below and the send port is getting suspended
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates a mismatching number of BEGIN and COMMIT statements. Previous count = 1, current count = 2.
can anyone just help me with this?

Begin TRANSACTION
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
BEGIN
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION ;
END
Exactly, you have a BEGIN TRANSACTION and a ROLLBACK in error case, but no COMMIT at all.
Olaf Helper
[ Blog] [ Xing] [ MVP]

How to reject ACK/NACK from other Send Ports to Orchestration

Hi Everyone,
I have a below scenario, Please let me your ideas how can we avoid ACK from other send ports (If there is any failures), in my current scenario getting issues or conflicts because of this
AckRequired.
Key points in my scenarios
SendPort_A is pointing to SAP
SendPort_B is pointing to SQL
Flow
Receive MessageA and Transform to MessageB format, send MessageB to SendPort_A which directly bind to orchestration with transmitted property enabled.
SendPort_B subscribes the same message, output of map with message type as filter condition (we are not expecting any Acknowledge from sendPort_B, because it’s a generic send port for some scenario).
Problem
When I see the context properties both send ports has AckRequired
Property to true (so getting ACK/NACK from both send ports).
I want acknowledgement only form SendPort_A which is bind to orchestration with transmitted property enabled, but not from the SendPort_B which subscribes just with message type.
I have tried the below points but no luck
Created custom pipeline with custom pipeline component to set / overwrite
AckRequired Property to false (Pipeline component is working fine, but nothing is overwriting in context, getting acknowledge back to orchestration for any failure in SendPort_B)
#region IComponentUI
public IBaseMessage Execute(IPipelineContext pContext, IBaseMessage pInMsg)
pInMsg.Context.Write("AckRequired", "http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003/system-properties", false);
return pInMsg;
#endregion
Below images gives some info on the same scenario.
Appreciate your suggestions.
Thanks, SMS Vikas K

Hi Vikas,
Let me know if I understood correctly.
SendPort_B subscribes the same message, output of map with message type as filter condition (we are not expecting any Acknowledge from sendPort_B, because it’s a generic send port for some scenario).
Problem
You have a send port B which is subscribing to the same message using the message type.
You can set additional filters to ignore Acknowledgement-
Ex- Mgtype= "" AND
AckRequired!=True OR
AckRequired!=False
Thanks,
Prashant
Please mark this post accordingly if it answers your query or is helpful.

Biztalk send to WCF-service that is behind a NLB

A while ago a WCF-service that biztalk 2006 r2 sends to was put behind a NLB.
I find that since than I sometimes get timeouts although biztalk was able to reach the service.
Also in my new test-environment using Bts2013 r2 I find that I sometimes get following response back (although the request was handled ok by the service)
I've been told that this is caused by the load-balancer...any ideas on how to solve this/what could be causing this
A message sent to adapter "WCF-Custom" on send port "aa" with URI "https://test.svc" is suspended.
Error details: System.ServiceModel.CommunicationException: An error occurred while receiving the HTTP response to
https://test.svc. This could be due to the service endpoint binding not using the HTTP protocol. This could also be due to an HTTP request context being aborted by the server (possibly due to the service shutting down). See server
logs for more details. ---> System.Net.WebException: The underlying connection was closed: An unexpected error occurred on a receive. ---> System.IO.IOException: Unable to read data from the transport connection: An existing connection was forcibly closed
by the remote host. ---> System.Net.Sockets.SocketException: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host
   at System.Net.Sockets.Socket.BeginReceive(Byte[] buffer, Int32 offset, Int32 size, SocketFlags socketFlags, AsyncCallback callback, Object state)
   at System.Net.Sockets.NetworkStream.BeginRead(Byte[] buffer, Int32 offset, Int32 size, AsyncCallback callback, Object state)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   at System.Net.Security._SslStream.EndRead(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
   at System.Net.TlsStream.EndRead(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
   at System.Net.PooledStream.EndRead(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
   at System.Net.Connection.ReadCallback(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.EndGetResponse(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelFactory`1.HttpRequestChannel.HttpChannelAsyncRequest.CompleteGetResponse(IAsyncResult result)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
Server stack trace:
   at System.Runtime.AsyncResult.End[TAsyncResult](IAsyncResult result)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.SendAsyncResult.End(SendAsyncResult result)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.EndCall(String action, Object[] outs, IAsyncResult result)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.EndRequest(IAsyncResult result)
Exception rethrown at [0]:
   at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.HandleReturnMessage(IMessage reqMsg, IMessage retMsg)
   at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateInvoke(MessageData& msgData, Int32 type)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.IRequestChannel.EndRequest(IAsyncResult result)
   at Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.Wcf.Runtime.WcfClient`2.RequestCallback(IAsyncResult result)
Kind regards Isabelledc

actually this is the exception I catch in my console-app (soap-fault)
<SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:encodingStyle="<SOAP:Body><SOAP:Fault><faultcode>Microsoft">http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"><SOAP:Body><SOAP:Fault><faultcode>Microsoft
BizTalk Server Negative Acknowledgment </faultcode><faultstring>An error occurred while processing the message, refer to the details section for more information </faultstring><faultactor>https://IntegrationServices.svc</faultactor><detail><ns0:NACK
Type="NACK" xmlns:ns0="<NAckID>{899D3BE7-A92A-49D2-8785-4394B35E5D19}</NAckID><ErrorCode>0xc0c0167a</ErrorCode><ErrorCategory>0</ErrorCategory><ErrorDescription>System.ServiceModel.CommunicationException">http://schema.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003/NACKMessage.xsd"><NAckID>{899D3BE7-A92A-49D2-8785-4394B35E5D19}</NAckID><ErrorCode>0xc0c0167a</ErrorCode><ErrorCategory>0</ErrorCategory><ErrorDescription>System.ServiceModel.CommunicationException:
The underlying connection was closed: A connection that was expected to be kept alive was closed by the server. ---> System.Net.WebException: The underlying connection was closed: A connection that was expected to be kept alive was closed by the server.
---> System.IO.IOException: Unable to read data from the transport connection: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host. ---> System.Net.Sockets.SocketException: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host
   at System.Net.Sockets.Socket.BeginReceive(Byte[] buffer, Int32 offset, Int32 size, SocketFlags socketFlags, AsyncCallback callback, Object state)
   at System.Net.Sockets.NetworkStream.BeginRead(Byte[] buffer, Int32 offset, Int32 size, AsyncCallback callback, Object state)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   at System.Net.Security._SslStream.EndRead(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
   at System.Net.TlsStream.EndRead(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
   at System.Net.PooledStream.EndRead(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
   at System.Net.Connection.ReadCallback(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.EndGetResponse(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelFactory`1.HttpRequestChannel.HttpChannelAsyncRequest.CompleteGetResponse(IAsyncResult result)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
Server stack trace:
   at System.Runtime.AsyncResult.End[TAsyncResult](IAsyncResult result)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.SendAsyncResult.End(SendAsyncResult result)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.EndCall(String action, Object[] outs, IAsyncResult result)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.EndRequest(IAsyncResult result)
Exception rethrown at [0]:
   at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.HandleReturnMessage(IMessage reqMsg, IMessage retMsg)
   at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateInvoke(MessageData& msgData, Int32 type)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.IRequestChannel.EndRequest(IAsyncResult result)
   at Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.Wcf.Runtime.WcfClient`2.RequestCallback(IAsyncResult result)</ErrorDescription></ns0:NACK></detail></SOAP:Fault></SOAP:Body></SOAP:Envelope>
Kind regards Isabelledc

AS2 over HTTP Send port question.

I have an application that builds and sends flat and EDI files to FTP, FILE, SqlAdapter send ports and now they want AS2 over an HTTP port, I understand the AS2 settings (using party resolution, etc.) what I don't get is how/what exactly is receiving
the message on the other side... They don't have a web service nor a page, I created a site to test but what do I do? Send an edi file to a url????
Bico Bielich

From your question I understand, you have been asked to send message through AS2. Do they also going to receive message through AS2 from their party? Is your question is about how to receive the message through AS2 which you also want to send over AS2?
You can configure
BTSHTTPReceive.dll to receive messages over HTTP and configure the Receive location with AS2 EDI pipeline component to receive messages over AS2 into BizTalk which can be subscribed by your send port filter or Orchestration ( if you have any process
to be applied before sending the message over AS2 send).
Check the Tutorial-3 part of AS2 which illustrate an example which receives an AS2 message through BTSHTTPReceive.dll.
Tutorial 3: AS2 Tutorial
And following references shall help you configure the BTSHTTPReceive.dll:
How to Configure IIS for an HTTP Receive Location
Configuring BTSHTTPReceive.dll to work on IIS 7
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

File Name in the Send Port with PGP Encryption

Hello,
The File Name in the Send Port should be set with the mask like ABC.txt.pgp. Since I have used the PGP Encryption Component it is generating the File name like ABC.pgp.txt.pgp. But what I need is just the ABC.txt.pgp. How can be this be done. Any help is
greatly appreciated.
Thanks

What you are seeing is the expected behavior. If you are referring to this:
https://code.msdn.microsoft.com/windowsdesktop/BizTalk-Sample-PGP-ebcbc8b2
or one of it's derivatives, it will internally modify FILE.ReceivedFileName to append .pgp if that property is set.
So, if you use just %SourceFileName%, you will likely get the desired result. Otherwise, you will have to explicitly set FILE.ReceivedFileName to ABC.txt somewhere before the PGP component.
You can also modify the source code to remove this behavior.

Error when using 64-bit host in send port

Guys,
I am trying out a simple message routing scenario. I have created a send pipeline and have used the MIME/SMIME component in the encoding stage of the pipeline. My application has a receive and a send port with receive port configured to receive *.xml documents
and is using XMLReceive pipeline. My send port uses the pipeline I have explained above and contains a filter to BTS.ReceivePortName=="[receive port in the application]". The send port is also configured to use a certificate. The send handler is the 64-bit
BizTalk host. When I drop a message in the receive port, message in the send port gets suspended with error "Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID {254B4003-2AA7-4C82-BB2E-18BA7F22DCD2} failed due to the following error: 80040154
Class not registered (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80040154 (REGDB_E_CLASSNOTREG)).
" However when I use a 32-bit host message on the send port gets encrypted as I expect. Has anyone faced this issue before and found a solution? BTW I am using BTS 2010 on 64-bit machine

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa559177(BTS.10).aspx
This occurs because the MIME pipeline component is not supported in a 64-bit host instance. To resolve this, the host associated with the send and receive handler for the file adapter must be configured as a 32-bit only host. For more information on this
see How to Modify Host Properties. If you already have a 32-bit only host configured on the system and want to use it see Configuring the File Adapter for instructions on configuring the host(s) associated to the file adapter’s send and receive handler.
The following is signature, not part of post
Please mark the post answered your question as the answer, and mark other helpful posts as helpful, so they will appear differently to other users who are visiting your thread for the same problem.
Visual C++ MVP

Biztalk send ports behaviour

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for